Assumptions have to be made regarding the journals of Celia Fiennes and the book of them claimed by the author Hon Mrs Griffiths as being a verbatim copy and the author of the website doing a verbatim copy of the book because I have never held the book or the journals let alone seen them. I have my experience of of some the places Celia Fiennes visited and my experience of reading physical printed books from the 1700's and 1800's as my guide.
I trust both Celia and Mrs Griffiths.
On we go then.
Sarum is not Salisbury as modern interpretations claim or Salsebury. Its a different place altogether as Celia notes.
It does show that by 1797 the cathedral was extant and in use.
severall to several, doores to doors, pulpet to pulpit, seates to seat, Isles to aisles, (there's an interesting one as I am told I live on the British Isles!) runnes to runs, quire to choir, leades to leads, Cloysters to cloisters.
Of course no mention of how Celia came to know this but presumably it was from the Dean at the time of the visit or one of his underlings.
Acoustically the building does not seem to have been built to lend itself to preaching or sermons let alone music. Unless its built precisely for voice and music just not in the locations within where there were to be found in Celia's time.
So much for etheric heating elements aka firedogs.
Odd is it not that this name has been so butchered and slid to invent Stonehenge and the Stone Age. It like academia and antiquarians pick and mix terms on a whim. Obviously it cannot have been built in the time of mobile cranes powered by diesel or steam as is often put forwards on this forum/ Speculation I too have undertaken on here ad its predecessor forum.
The reason we see so many walls of bare stone or brick is simply that its too expensive to restore plaster in old buildings still roofed, even many churches, and in roofless buildings utterly pointless as weather and vandal alike will sooner or later remove it.
More to follow.
The domes an cupolas were built to allow the owner to show off how skilled he was at choosing a place to build his house which afforded greater view than another. The better the placement the greater the status coming from the amount of land seen which is in the ownership of the owner.
The Masonic Order sold to us today doesn't get a mention.
Also the mention of barrows and hills smacks of a landscape shaped by man.
One thing I have noticed which is quite remarkable in the context of the way they are used today, Celia doesn't mark by date. We are brought up in a society where the date is all important. This must have come into being between the late 1690's and whatever year you dear reader happened to be born.
I trust both Celia and Mrs Griffiths.
Celia Fiennes lived at roughly the same time as Daniel Defoe. She was born in 1662 at Newton Toney, Salisbury, the daughter of a colonel in Cromwell's army. She is remarkable for the journeys she made, and the account she wrote of them: she rode side-saddle through every county in England, accompanied only by two servants. Although she always lived in the south, in 1697 and 1698 she made two long journeys through northern England and Scotland. She travelled to improve her health, visiting many spa towns, but also for personal adventure. Her account of her travels seems to have been written after her travels had largely ended, in 1702. She described both the great houses she visited and the developing new industries. She died in 1741.
On we go then.
Streetes has been slid in modern parlance to streets and ye to the and of course easye to easy not to mention stepps to steps. This sliding becomes ever more obvious as we go through the diary.I went to Sarum 8 miles which is a Citty and Bishop's Seat, pretty Large town Streetes broad but through ye midst of them runs a little rivulet of water which makes ye Streetes not so clean or so easye to pass in, they have stepps to Cross it and many open places for horses and Carriages to Cross itt
Sarum is not Salisbury as modern interpretations claim or Salsebury. Its a different place altogether as Celia notes.
Fire destroyed Salisbury which was on a hill with springs that dried out i would appear so it begs the question why people chose to live up there. It also begs the question what caused the fire and was the town all within the confines of the castle walls.itt takes off Much from the beauty of ye streetes - the Cause of it was from the burning of the old town called Salsebury which was on a hill about a mile off this and it was so drye and farre from springs that it was destroyed by fire and only the ruines of the Castle is to be seen like a high wall with fortifications:
Here we read Celia clearly showing the location of what is today called Salisbury Cathedral being located in a water meadow and describes its foundations as being of faggots and timber. The assumption being that at the time of its construction the water meadow was indeed watery. It could of course have not been a water meadow at the time of construction and was in fact dry land but became a water meadow after it was built due to a change in the course of rivers and streams either by natural or man made means.Ye Dean has a very good house and Gardens, so is the Bishop's Palace at ye end of a Row of trees - the roomes are lofty and Stately: all these houses are round ye Cathedrall which is esteemed the finest in England in all respects, it only lyes low in a watry meadow so yt the foundations is in the water, made of ffaggots and timber,
It does show that by 1797 the cathedral was extant and in use.
More word sliding.there are severall doores into ye Church, in the body of it stands the pulpet and seates on each side; there are two large Isle's runnes up on either side; the font stands below opposite to the quire yt enters wth 2 or 3 steps assent from a large Cross Isle that leades to the Cloysters, in which is ye Chapter house which is very large and supported only by one small stone Pillar in ye middle,
severall to several, doores to doors, pulpet to pulpit, seates to seat, Isles to aisles, (there's an interesting one as I am told I live on the British Isles!) runnes to runs, quire to choir, leades to leads, Cloysters to cloisters.
300 years standing so finished in 1397 or so. A long time indeed for a structure built in a water meadow on a foundation of faggots and timber to stay up. And the paint lasting 300 years and still looking fresh, note. Given the experience of modern paints and viewing painted walls in churches or most often fragments of painted walls in churches this 300 year claim does seem doubtful for the paint at least.The roofe of the Church is very lofty and exactly neate in all things though not so large as some other Cathedralls - the top of the Qoire is exactly painted and it lookes as fresh as if but new done though of 300 yeares standing
Of course no mention of how Celia came to know this but presumably it was from the Dean at the time of the visit or one of his underlings.
Organs seem to have been around a long time.there is a very good organ and a deske for the reader raised so high even with the organ for ye advantage of the voice to be heard, yet ye Church is so lofty yt ye Eccos drowns ye Intelligableness of the voice.
Acoustically the building does not seem to have been built to lend itself to preaching or sermons let alone music. Unless its built precisely for voice and music just not in the locations within where there were to be found in Celia's time.
Seems nutters are not a modern phenomenon!there is the Effigee in stone of a doctor that starved himself to death attempting to imitate our Saviour to fast 40 dayes - but at 31 dayes end he became sensible of his evil and would have retrieved his life by eateing againe, but then by ye Just judgment of god could not swallow any thing down his throate;
Coale to coal, naturally, but here we seen two coalfields as we would call them being dug in 1697. The Midiffe being slid to Midlands. As coal was being dug it was clearly being used. Seems an obvious thing to have to say but modern academia and history seems to be want to overlook this and instead links coal production to the industrial revolution as its called.its a pretty little town a good Market for corn and there is the Mindiffe Coale which is allmost as good as the sea Coale from newcastle that is dugg out of the hills all about;
One Chimney which is what has been slid through to today as fireplace. What we today call a chimney was in Celias day Tunnell. Interesting.there is one dineing roome yt the Chimney is just under a window and the Tunnells runnes upon each side. There is one Chamber, the chimney stands Just by the window opposite to Salsebury, and on the black Marble Chimney piece soe finely polished you may see all the Cathedrall as in a Glass; I have seen it plaine.
So much for etheric heating elements aka firedogs.
Water engineering was obviously not in its infancy. Water is delivered from the river in pipework and once in the gardens delivered to the ornament by more pipework to entertain and amaze guests. 1697 don't forget.Ye river runns through ye garden that easeily conveys by pipes water to all Parts.
A Grottoe is att ye end of the garden just ye middle off ye house - its garnished with many fine ffigures of ye Goddesses, and about 2 yards off the doore is severall pipes in a line that with a sluce spoutts water up to wett the strangers - in the middle roome is a round table and a large Pipe in the midst, on which they put a Crown or Gun or a branch, and so yt spouts the water through ye Carvings and poynts all round ye roome at ye Artists pleasure to wet ye Company
More water engineering to entertain and more word sliding. Grottoe to grotto, barristers to balustrades (barristers in the legal world seen in a very different light now), lyons to lions. The people of the time were ingenious and inventive perhaps building on earlier generations efforts. Assuming the pipe to be lead I would argue it puts the mythical Romans and equally mythical Normans into the same frame basically the people before 1697 who invented and built water engineering whoever they were and whenever they lived.Ye Grottoe is leaded on ye top where are fish ponds, and just without ye grottoe is a wooden bridge over ye river. Ye barristers are set out wth Lyons set thick on Either Side wth their mouths open, and by a sluce spout out water each to other in a perfect arch ye length of ye bridge.
Stoneage eh!t lyes 15 mile from Winchester - it is three mile from Amesbury and 2 mile more to Stoneage that stands on Salsebury plaine - eminent for many battles being faught there - this Stoneage is reckon'd one of the wonders of England how such prodigeous stone should be brought there, as no such Stone is seen in ye Country nearer than 20 mile. They are placed on the side of a hill in a rude jregullar form - two stones stands up and one laid on their tops with morteses into each other and thus are severall in a round like a wall with spaces between, but some are fallen down, so spoyle the order or breach in the temple, as some think it was in the heathen tymes; others thinke it the Trophy of some victory wone by one Ambrosious, and thence the town by it has its name of. Amsebury. There is severall rows of lesser stones within the others set up in the same forme of 2 upright and one lies on the top like a gateway. How they were brought thither or whether they are a made stone is not resolved - they are very hard yet I have seen some of them scraped - the weather seemes not to penetrate them. To increase the wonder of the story is that none Can Count them twice alike - they stand confused and some single stones at a distance but I have told them often, and bring their number to 91.
Odd is it not that this name has been so butchered and slid to invent Stonehenge and the Stone Age. It like academia and antiquarians pick and mix terms on a whim. Obviously it cannot have been built in the time of mobile cranes powered by diesel or steam as is often put forwards on this forum/ Speculation I too have undertaken on here ad its predecessor forum.
Seems to me Celia is writing of internal walls being plastered. This is prime evidence of wall plastering being the norm in buildings of Celia's time and prior so to think buildings put up subsequent to her time not being so plastered is erroneous. On a practical level it is far easier to create a smooth flat wall from plaster than it is stone and brick. Flat walls allow for much more usage purposes than uneven walls and crucially they do not harbour, dust, vermin or dirt.From Stonidge I went to Evell in Somersetshire, thence to Meer a little town about 15 mile; by the town is a vast high hill called the Castle of Meer - its now all grass over and so steepe up that the ascent is by footsteps cut in the side of the hill. I was on the top where some had been digging and was come to a space that was Arched and the walls plaistred and washed white and smooth - it was but a little roome, I tooke a piece of its walls and plaister. That shews there may be Cells or vaults in the hill
The reason we see so many walls of bare stone or brick is simply that its too expensive to restore plaster in old buildings still roofed, even many churches, and in roofless buildings utterly pointless as weather and vandal alike will sooner or later remove it.
More to follow.
Journey to the Bath. Not ye Bath or just Bath as it is known today.Another Journey to the Bath, from Newtontony to Warminster 18 miles a good road town and good way;Jo
Celia makes many mentions of "pitched" in her descriptions of towns and roads. It seems that even in 1697-8 it was known that therehad to be a hard surface on such things to make them useable. I wonder why so few if any of the streets and roads in America are mentioned as being pitched. Unless of course the people of America did not know of such a practice or felt the need of it.we passed over one Common of some miles Length on a narrow Causy that a Coach can scarce pass, all pitched with slatts and stones-our Coach was once wedged in ye wheele in the stones that severall men were forced to lift us out; its made only for Packhorses which is the way of Carriage in those parts.
Another pointer to my mind that shows history before Celia's time was both little known and invented. The Baths at Bath are claimed to have been of Roman construction but reality is no bugger knows. All that can be said of them is in 1697 they were in use as places of cleansing and healing and the infrastructure of them was all in place. Celia herself makes no note of any historical claims for them which she does for many other places, buildings and infrastructure so possibly these baths do not predate her time by all that much. A generation or two perhaps.Ye town and all its accomodations is adapted to ye batheing and drinking of the waters and to nothing else, the streetes are well pitched and Cleane kept and there are Chaires as in London to Carry ye better sort of people in visits, or if sick or infirme and is only in the town, for its so Encompassed with high hills few care to take the aire on them.
Now then. Apricots are too tender to grow to fruit. most years. over my lifetime. They need heat and long days to ripen properly yet here is Celia in 1697 writing of apricots being grown outside which alludes to a warmer climate than it is today.by ffarington is a fine house of Sr George Pratt's Called Coalsell. All ye avenues to ye house are fine walkes of rows of trees, ye garden lyes in a great descent below ye house of many steps and terresses and walkes one below another, a green walke with all sorts of Dwarfe trees, fruit trees with standing apricot and flower trees, abundance of garden roome and filled with all sorts of things improved for pleasure and use.
Steps are a prominent feature of her descriptions of houses. The specific number seems to be a measure of wealth an or status of the principal resident of the house. Lofty halls are a measure in the same vein. That nails the giant nonsense for me if not for you.The Entrance of ye house is an ascent of severall steps into a hall so lofty the rooff is three storyes, reaches to ye floore of ye gallery
Another fancy bites the dust.Over this runs a gallery all through the house, and on each side severall garret roomes for servants ffurnished very neate and Genteele, in ye middle are staires yt Lead up to the Cupilow or large Lanthorn in the middle of the leads. Ye house being Leaded all over and the stone Chimney's in severall rows Comes up in them on each side ye Cupilow, it shewes exact and very uniform, as is ye whole Building. This gives you a great prospect of gardens, grounds and woods that appertaine to ye Seate, as well as a sight of the Country at a distance.
The domes an cupolas were built to allow the owner to show off how skilled he was at choosing a place to build his house which afforded greater view than another. The better the placement the greater the status coming from the amount of land seen which is in the ownership of the owner.
This description of black and white marble flooring appears time and again. These days and especially in these forums much is written about black and white floors being masonic symbology but in 1697 they are the fashion status symbol of the day. All the new houses she encounters seem to have had black and white marble floors installed in their halls. The older, lower, buildings seem to have them too but in nowhere near the number of the stone built houses.There was few pictures in the house only over doores and Chimney's; the hall was paved with black and whyte marble and had seates round the roome cut in arches on the walls.
The Masonic Order sold to us today doesn't get a mention.
Say and Seale is a name and or title I have never come across before. It appears at first blush to allue to speaking coming first thn writing doing the sealing. But what do I know?Broughton is an ancient Seate of ye Lord viscount Say and Seale; its an old house moted round, and a parke and Gardens, but are much left to decay and ruine when my brother Came to it.
Edgehill it does seem was the site of a battle between Parliament and Kings forces. The mention of the violence of the wind is interesting as it would appear to me both forces would have been aware of the wind and mustered accordingly to use it to their advantage and their opponents disadvantage but I don't know enough to see if the accounts of the battle mention it at all.From Broughton I went to see Edgehill where was the ffamous Battle ffought in Cromwell's tyme-its 10 mile off, the Ridge of hills runns a great length and so high that the land beneath it appeares vastly distant, its a rich ground full of inclosures and lookes finely, tho' fformidable to look down on it and turnes one's head round-the wind allwayes blows wth great violence there because of the Steepeness of ye hills. The top is a flatt full of Barrows and hills that are markes of a Camp and battles.
Also the mention of barrows and hills smacks of a landscape shaped by man.
Which suggest Dashwoods are an old family.About 2 mile from Broughton is a great old house much like Broughton; its Sr Robert Dashwoods-most of the great houses there about are old built.
One thing I have noticed which is quite remarkable in the context of the way they are used today, Celia doesn't mark by date. We are brought up in a society where the date is all important. This must have come into being between the late 1690's and whatever year you dear reader happened to be born.
Last edited: