SH Archive Traction Engine or Oxen?

SH.org OP Username
jd755
SH.org OP Date
2019-06-18 09:24:57
SH.org Reaction Score
14
SH.org Reply Count
12

Jd755

Core Member
Active Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2022
Messages
2,690
Reaction score
5,090
Here's the picture that triggered the posting of
3b32794r.jpg

the Thompson steam tractor.
Kath._Illustratie_1869-1870_nr_44_p.352_Thomson_road_steamer_with_charcoal_wagons.jpg

The reason for creating this post is to not dilute the capitol building thread. Evolution of the Capitol Building, Washington DC

The argument goes that the machine pictured above could pull the column and cart hooked up to the oxen in the picture above therefore the picture is misleading either deliberately or accidentally by mis-dating.
Leaving aside the difference in dates, oxen power 1860, steam power 1870 as there is no way to prove neither.

From here Thomson Road Steamer | Old Book Illustrations
It appears the farm tractor is said to be able to pull a 30 ton load on the flat. (Imperial tons not metric tonnes hence the different spelling.)
The book the description is taken from is French dated 1876.

In 1867, Robert William Thomson patented solid India-rubber tires for the road steamers manufactured in his Leith workshop. Fitted with this equipment, a vehicle like the one shown above could be driven across a meadow without the wheels sinking too deeply into the ground. On a flat road, it could tow 30 tons at a speed of 2.5 to 6 mph (4 to 10 km/h); it could reach 16 to 18 horsepower.

Case closed it would seem. However the invention of the solid tyre comes 7 years after the oxen picture and as this seems to have been invented for a reason. And the best the traction engine could produce was 18hp.

From here Robert William Thomson: Biography on Undiscovered Scotland

By 1867 he ran a company producing "road steamers", self propelled road going steam engines. He made a series of significant improvements to their design and, most importantly, wrapped their metal wheels - which often damaged roads or simply restricted the mobility of the vehicles - with solid vulcanised rubber tyres. The popularity of road steamers for pulling goods like coal dramatically increased as a result, and by the end of the 1860s an omnibus service opened, carrying passengers between Edinburgh and Leith and using vehicles (and tyres) designed and built by Thomson.

Again mentioning 1867 as the date of significance. Seems kind of odd to me that a machine that can pull 30 tons is reduced to pulling an omnibus so soon after its invention. No mention of how many tons of coal it pulled but an omnibus full of people is not 30 tons in weight.

From here Tratores Antigos via google translate

In 1867, Thomson patented his wheels coating process with solid vulcanized rubber straps. Designed an efficient motor 6 hp steam, which was manufactured by TM Tennant & Co., located in Leith, a district of Edinburgh, Scotland. In November 1867, Thomson set up its first road steamer in his own workshop, also in Leith. The wheels were coated with solid rubber strips 5 inches thick and 12 inches wide.

6hp now gets a mention, a third of the previous article. Once again 1867 is mentioned so on the balance of probability Thomson's steamer did not exist at the probable date of the oxen picture and also the metal tyres of the machines that did gave them a distinct disadvantage to oxen as in they didn't grip that well sinking in rather than rolling over, hence the invention of the vulcanised rubber tyre.
The greatest amount of pulling effort is required to get the weight moving. Once its moving even slowly and slightly the effort required reduces dramatically, apologies if it looks like I am telling you how to suck eggs.
16 oxen gives 64 points of contact with the ground over a much greater surface area than the contact area of wheeled traction engine.
In short they could get the load/transporter moving whereas the traction engine could not.

But then there is this.
The road Thomson steamer was evaluated by Professor Archer (The Engineer, September 4, 1868). He noted that, at first glance, he thought the rubber was not suitable for the vehicle's weight. Disbelief found later that the vehicle passed over every type of material without any damage to rubber and flicker. It was a test in Leith, Scotland, where Thomson vehicles were manufactured until the time. Archer estimated the weight of the road steamer in about 4 or 5 tons and was impressed with what he saw. Continued reporting that the road steamer engaged a trailer with more than 10 tons and up a slope, with slope of 1 for 20 with no difficulty. Archer noted that the vehicle used an economic vertical boiler, similar externally with other time, but completely different on the inside, which made it much more efficient. In another test the road steamer pulled wagons loaded with coal, with a total weight of the assembly of more than 40 tons, a route between two locations without difficulty. Archer concluded that the vehicle has exceeded all expectations, adding that the wheels with rubber not even skated on the ice.

So just what could this machine actually pull 30 ton, more than 40 tons presumably on the flat as it could only manage more than 10 tons up a 1 in 20?
Are we just reading advertising bullshit of the day?
Who can say.

The Thomson road steamer arrived in Paris in early 1870, as stated in The New York-maker Coach's Magazine, March 1870. Acoplava Versailles bus for 50 passengers. This little steam locomotive traction with rubber-coated wheels, it was a great innovation. The rubber increased friction with the ground, preventing landslides, reduced noise and jitter. Almost were not affected by environmental factors such as heat, humidity or cold.

Why a bus why not have it pulling great weights hitherto impossible? Makes no sense if the pulling power were the selling point.

Between 1870 and 1873, the demand for Thomson road steamer was great and the Leith factory could not keep up. In 1870 and 1871, Thomson has provided licenses to manufacture its road steamer by other companies in England and the United States

Douw D. Williamson was licensed in the United States. About 50 units of the vehicle were manufactured in New Jersey and California. Many were used as plow, but have not had great success in this application.



What you make of this tale is as always up to you. For me the inability of this machine to pull the weight of 14 tons plus transporter is on the balance of probability is satisfied. The invention of the tyre suggests that prior to the tyres invention the machines that existed were even less capable of pulling what the oxen could pull, on the balance of probability.
The use of the machine to pull omnibuses not road trains of heavy loads also suggests it couldn't do what was claimed it could.

From here The Williamson Road Steamer and Steam Plow - Steam Engines - Farm Collector

In 1869, Douw D. Williamson started a five-year effort to produce a successful American steam plow, a goal he described in an article titled “Plowing by Steam” in Van Nostrand’s Magazine in 1878: “Perhaps no branch of engineering has been more fascinating to mechanical engineers than that of steam plowing. The thought of inventing an implement which would supersede the common plow and revolutionize a process which is older than Christianity itself has, for many years, stirred the hearts and brains of ingenious men and incited them to patient labor and extraordinary effort.“ None have struggled more with this problem or met with greater disappointment than American engineers. The cheapness of our prairie land; the size of our farms; their natural adaptation to steam cultivation; the high cost and uncertainty of labor and many other reasons made it appear probable that this country would bring forth the steam plow and perfect it. The records of the Patent Office show how many men thought they had accomplished it. The fact that, in the year 1870, not a steam plow was practically working in the country proved the value of these patents,”

Which seems to me to suggest that there was a problem in reality that doesn't exist in drawings and engravings or theories that make up patents.

Williamson’s quest to develop a steam plow in America began in Scotland in 1869, where he investigated the Thomson road engine, a then-new steam traction engine concept. It could not only carry heavy loads over soft ground, according to A Century of Traction Engines by W.J. Hughes, but also travel on a good road over 20 MPH when built for speed. Williamson described his experience when he first saw the Thomson engine near Edinburgh, Scotland:

“In the year 1869, I saw a ‘Thomson Road Steamer’ with its broad rubber tires draw a train of heavily loaded wagons over a soft wet field in Scotland. I rode upon the engine when it drew the same load through the yielding deep sands on the shore of the Firth of Forth, and when it climbed the steep slippery streets of the old town Edinburgh. I spent many days with it striving to find a fault with its peculiar tire, but the more I examined its workings the more I was convinced that its camel-footed, elastic tread solved the great question of maintaining its footing, whilst working in soft soil and drawing plows behind it.”


Sounds great, all again seemingly taking place after the oxen picture was taken.

“Having arranged for the right to work under the American Patents, I imported an engine from Scotland in 1870, and commenced a series of experiments with it,” Williams continued. “Whilst the rubber tire did all and more than I had expected, I found the difficulty of maintaining steam a most serious drawback.

And to end a picture of an engraving which if drawn to scale shows just how small it was when compared to the people.

From here História dos Thomson Road Steamers

thomson-road-steamer.jpg
Note: This OP was recovered from the Wayback Archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2019-06-18 11:43:39
Reaction Score: 1
Great research. Love stuff like this.

As far as "how small it was when compared to the people", it could really depend on the size of the people, and the specific model.

st_5.jpg

1870 model
steam_roller_1.jpg

1857 Model
Tuxford Steam Horse
The Illustrated London News, Dec. 12, 1857

Antique-1857-Steam-Engine-Tractor-Engraving-Cattle-Farm-Civil-War-Era-Motor-Farm-_57.jpg

1869 Model
(George Minniss?)
georges-minnis-tracklaying-1869.jpg
Source: More of those in here.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2019-06-18 15:34:57
Reaction Score: 1
Nope. Thomsons machine was small.
From here Port Elizabeth of Yore: The Era of Coaches - The Casual Observer

Of these, perhaps the most innovative was the Graaff-Reiner Road Steamer Company, which with a capital of R 4000, proposed to import from England one of Thompson’s 8 h.p. road steamers. The contraption, it was claimed, was capable of drawing a load of 12 tons, which was equivalent to three ordinary wagon-loads, by easy stages of 30 miles per day.

Another set of stats that say it was only 8 hp and could pull 12 tons. No match for the oxen.
I know you want a photograph so here it is.
Thomsons-road-steamer-Derwent-in-operation-at-Leith-Edinburgh-Scotland.-Thomson-built-his-firs...jpg

Interesting the description is: "Thomsons road steamer Derwent in operation at Leith Edinburgh Scotland. Thomson built his first road steamer in November 1867"
I wonder where all the good quality photographs have been stashed.

Then there's this https://www.geoffmynett.com/news

Francis J. Barnard, the business man and later member of Parliament, had bought six of the new road steamers that Robert Thomson of Edinburgh had invented in 1869. These road steamers were a great improvement because they had rubber tires, making for a more comfortable ride. The tires were “soft-vulcanized rubber, twelve inches in width and five inches in thickness” with a chain of steel over it.

The new means of transport was debated in the BC Legislature and most people thought they were a sign of progress. The benefits would undeniably be huge, including the ability to carry huge weights of freight, for a very low cost in only eight days. Trials in Yale on April 19 proved its worth to the entire satisfaction of the owners. Hopes were high. They started to operate the service some days later.

On May 5, 1871, however, the company announced “that there will be a temporary interruption to the road steamer enterprise in the upper country. It was found that the links holding the steel shoes which form the flexible or outer tires, being made of malleable cast iron, will not answer on the rocky roads of the Colony.”

Alas, the truth was that in actual operation on rough BC trails, they broke down. They were soon removed from the highways and byways (actually more like trails and rugged wagon roads) and one was put into operation in a logging operation on English Bay in Vancouver. Four were sent back to Scotland.

Road+Steamer+2.JPG


And then we get gracesguide whose contemporary content pushes up the pulling capability yet again to 40 tons this time up steep gradients.
Robert William Thomson - Graces Guide
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2019-06-18 17:48:11
Reaction Score: 1
Why do you think that this specific Thompson model could be the only one available to them?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2019-06-18 19:16:05
Reaction Score: 1
Available to who?
None were available to pull that column, assuming the dating is somewhere near of course.

Here's a bit more from here thomson steamers; Hornsby Crawler; Holt - Landships WW1 Forum


Image11psp.jpeg

I doubt if the top hatted gentlemen shown in the photograph are in India! This machine travelled extensively in Britain before being sent to India. The occasion of the photograph is likely to be the RASE show at which the machine was exhibited. The trailer was used as an office for the show judges. Unfortunately, the steamer didn't perform very well at the show and there was constant trouble with the boiler. Eventually, it was sent back to the makers in disgrace. A new boiler design cured the problem.

Thanks for all the tidbits on Thomson people. The engines were exported to Canada, but they
did not work well as they scared the camels.

Pretty close

1) Crompton builds the steam cart "Bluebell" - the remains of which are still in the Science Museum collection. Think of a four wheel cart and a boiler and you're not far wrong.

2) Crompton is interested in getting rubber tyres for Bluebell - not suitable but ends up getting the Prima, a Thomson Steamer, to try out for the Government.

3) Crompton goes back to England to sort out the ordering of four machines etc. They are built by Ransomes.

4) Boilers - Crompton doesn't like the Pot Boiler and complains about it endlessly. However I don't believe he ever told Thomson he was burning wood, not coal - which may account for some of his bad experiences. He arranges direct with Lewis Olrick the Field Boilers.

Now what is interesting is that others got on fine with the Pot Boilers - the Woolwich Arsenal have the problem that theirs steams too fiercely. Curiously when the usual fireman is not around Ransomes/Crompton have trouble getting a decent performance from a Field boiler.

5 Four machines made by Ransomes go to India on this order. None with horizontal boilers used by Crompton/Government. Most with horizontal boilers are a Burrell varation anyway.

Names of machines - yes someone had a fixation with Rivers. Amongst those I know are Derwent, two machines (in succession) named Don then there are the machines ordered by Crompton:- Chenab, Ravee, Sutlej and Hindus - all anglisiced names of fairly local Indian rivers.

Ransomes Simms & Head were the busy chaps - telling Chenab and Ravee apart in the summer of 1871 is problematic as Ransomes/Crompton are using which ever one is in the best condition. But it seems they only have one roof - so just because it has a roof on that says Chenab it may not be - it could be Ravee. And of course these are identical engines apart from any tinkering or experiments.

Add to that the Chenab starts with a Pot Boiler and then has a Field Boiler fitted - these aren't always easy to tell apart anyway - but when you have a replacement boiler to exactly the same exterior dimensions then it becomes a major headache.



And here; Pickering Brook Heritage Group- Heritage Sites


Evidently Mr. Wanliss of the Rockingham Timber Company was one of the first to use this method of transport. In the "Enquirer" of the sixteenth August, 1871 is recorded the fact that Mr. Wanliss imported from Melbourne, an eight horsepower traction engine called the Thompson's Road Steamer and it arrived in this State aboard the schooner "Azelia". After its arrival, it was used by the company for general haulage concerned with the building of the line and also hauling materials to and from the mill. One of its jobs a few months later was to haul the new loco, the "Governor Weld", from Perth to Rockingham where it was assembled.

This tractor caught the attention of the then Colonial Secretary, Sir Luke Leake who showed great interest in this new form of transport.

In the "Enquirer" of October 1st, 1877, a news item states that in company with Mr. Lee Steere, Sir Luke traveled to Jarrahdale by train from Rockingham where he was welcomed by the manager Mr. Steedman. A gloom was cast over the visit by the fact that a Mr. George Vackner had been killed in the mill the day before, having been caught in a belt and severely mutilated. The report went on to say that Sir Luke met up with an old friend in a new guise, The Thompson's Road Steamer, now stripped of its wheels and used to drive the saw-sharpening machinery in the mill.



Once again in use it seems Thomsons steamers have either been fantastic or next to useless.

A slight aside but look at this monster from the latter site. Imagine what would happen if someone built something like this today.
steamwhim28.jpg
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2019-06-18 19:25:22
Reaction Score: 1
I find it hard to believe that they struggled that much with these power plants that were already very prevalent on ships of the time.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2019-06-18 19:33:09
Reaction Score: 0
I do not understand why you choose to say that none were available. Posted at least two before, here is one of those. 50 tons upward should be sufficient.

The International Exhibition of 1862:
The scale of the indoctrination process was amazing.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2019-06-18 20:11:47
Reaction Score: 0
Probably me being a bit thick here but as far as I can tell road going traction engines prior to the Thomson steamer or more precisely prior to the rubber tyre invention were prone to digging in or unmade roads and damaging metalled roads. That was the reason why he came up with the invention.
I get where you are at you cannot square the pulling power of oxen with the existence of steam powered traction engines both being concurrent in terms of time, at least I feel that's where your struggle lies.

It's this 'linear thinking' we all suffer from thanks to the wonder that is state education and 'old is primitive'. These two plague me for sure when it come to anything from the past. The time line for example is an appalling example of the manifestation of the problem.

I cannot find any reference in any of the three search engines I use to there being steam traction in use in Washington DC over the time the Capitol alterations were being done. That means exactly what it says.
I find no issue with the oxen being used to pull that column as they were superior in terms of traction to any iron wheeled traction engine of the date.

The only thing about that transporter for me is how the hell did they steer it. Today there is a fifth wheel coupling but did such a thing exist back then?

I've found two more bits of interest.
But first it seems the original boiler the 'pot boiler' of Thomsons design, seems to have been what is called 'weepy' in that it struggles to maintain steam pressure. Not unusual as new innovations always seem to have to go through the process of use to find out the flaws, if any. They all work on paper, not all work in practice.
The boiler was replaced by a different designs.
Given the tales above of the American who imported five of them to use as ploughs and ended up sending four back to Scotland it seems they had the original 'weepy' boilers.
Had the machines been any good at pulling heavy loads it would have made more sense to me to flog them off to a mining concern but that's just me.

Here's a book on gutenburg from 1891 that is interesting to see what was about in steam locomotion of the day. History and development of steam locomotion on common roads

And this from gracesguide Ransomes, Sims and Jefferies: Road Locomotive - Graces Guide

Is an extract from that book where the Thomson machines are covered in detail. I leave the reader of this thread to have a read through that extract and make their own mind up whether the Thomson steamers were up to the job or not.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2019-06-18 20:31:36
Reaction Score: 0
Are you suggesting that this Taplin model was built for the improved hard surface roads in 1862?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Japod
Date: 2019-06-18 21:04:49
Reaction Score: 0
Pulling strength is measured in torque (pound feet per square inch), hp is a rather misleading number as a motor could have 8hp and 300 ft/lbs of torque which would be enough to get that type of weight moving. Most modern diesel engines have torque numbers that are 3 times that of its horsepower.


Steam Tractor making 120Hp and 3000ftlbs of torque at 250 rpm.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2019-06-18 21:20:27
Reaction Score: 0
Not suggesting anything. According to gracesguide Taplin went bust.
Benjamin Dutton Taplin - Graces Guide

And from the same site

1862 May. At the Bath and West Society Show, they are shown as Taplin, Robey and Co with a traction engine.

1862 Exhibited at the 1862 London Exhibition with a model with duplex cylinders and producing 10 bhp.

Cannot find anything about its purpose but look at the difference between the wheels of the two machines. Robey & Co carried on but not with that machine Robey and Co - Graces Guide

The machine in that article had Thomsons tyres on it and it managed to pull 10 tons. Too tired to read all of that article so cannot tell if it was a Thomsons machine or one of their own design.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2019-06-18 22:09:25
Reaction Score: 2
The other day there was a Honda getting loaded on a tow truck, it does not mean all of them Hondas are bad.

A78B2CDD-23D9-4F5F-98A4-7F56E52BC506.jpeg
801D89F2-0B35-4DFB-9F24-BCE9FE92C0AF.jpeg
I think we have two totally different views on the Industrial Revolution tech. You appear to classify those as inventions, I see all that stuff they threw in around 1850s as a technological injection of the pre-existing knowledge. With only small portions of that knowledge being shown to us. Later they did the same through Tesla, and they still do it but in a measured manner. Some consider Tesla a genius who did all the R&D in his head and simply delivered ready to use projects. Some think otherwise.

Thinking that they used the same horse tech in 1860s which was allegedly used 400 years prior to pull those gigantic cannons is well past my consideration.

In 1858 these people pulled a telegraph cable across the Atlantic, but in 1860s they chose 2,000 y.o. oxen tech to build the most important building in the United States? Technology does not exist in a vacuum. We all form our personal opinions, this one is mine.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2019-06-19 08:33:11
Reaction Score: 0
Fair enough. All I set out to show was the oxen pulling heavy weights in 1860 was likely whereas the steam traction engine you proposed as the machine that should have been used wasn't. There were steam engines around but it seems from the contemporary evidence they were not reliable and as ever their performance didn't match the builder/manufacturers claims.
Oxen still pull heavy weights today, no lbsfeet torque there though. Surviving steam traction engines do as well. The 'new kid' is diesel power so all three technologies are around together in 2019 and on a practical level they all work. This what I meant about linear thinking being the wrong way.
Turns out I learnt a lot and remembered a lot about steam and animal power.
When building anything massive you use the most reliable and efficient tech available to hit the deadline, to me at least.

Here's some other animal, steam and gasoline power photo's with dates and sources and for what its worth my current feeling is history is waaaay more condensed in time that we get told it is, most of it is made up bollocks including the tangible bits, with fakers working 24/7 to obfuscate the literal grains of truth that get out 'into the wild' with layers of documents, maps, opinions and when the crowd is looking 'over here' I have always turned and looked the other way as I do here.

From here Historical Logging | Oxen Team
And my GOD how destructive was the logging process!
p26738570-3.jpg
Oxen teams numbering 16 to 20 animals were a common sight in Northern California lumber camps until nearly 1895. As they pulled giant Redwood logs from the forests along skid roads made of small green logs. Each Ox pair known as a span, could pull more then 4,000 pounds. Log sections over 10 feet in diameter and weighted up to 40 tons were not uncommon.

From here https://www.oldoregonphotos.com/sub...g-a-holt-bros-side-hill-harvester-c-1900.html
32 Horses Pulling a Holt Bros. Side-hill Harvester - c. 1900
in950z550.jpg

From here 1900 Wheat Field, Covina, California Vintage Photograph 8.5" x 11" Reprint
1900 steam power in action
1900.jpg
This reprint of a vintage photograph shows a Wheat Field, Covina,
California in 1900.

From here Agriculture
WIT_10_McCormick_Deering_combine_1927-28_Linda_Koolen.jpg

Quennie Edwards driving McCormick-Deering tractor and combine, 1927-1928

From here 13 Vintage Photos of Combines
1941.jpg
A farmer and mules pull a combine through fields of wheat, ca. 1941.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: sidds
Date: 2020-04-13 11:04:01
Reaction Score: 0
Hi @jd755 you tell me where you got the image on the 5th post from? Thanks
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top