SH Archive Was Stonehenge rebuilt, or constructed in 1954?

[KD Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-12-28 03:42:26
Reaction Score: 1

Hmm... Stonehenge site 'damaged' by engineers working on tunnel

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Ice Nine
Date: 2019-01-27 15:13:21
Reaction Score: 15

Hey I think I found the origins of Stonehenge and in light of this finding, maybe I'm right. Scottish stone circle isn’t so ancient after all, archaeologists say
Ok so maybe I'm half jesting, but when I ran across this 1807 engraving it really did make me sit up and take notice.

"Stack and Thrashing Yard"
This is an original 1807 black and white copper engraving of the exterior view and ground plan of an English threshing mill during the early 19th century, that depicts the circular ground plot (fig. 1), the granary (fig. B), the chaff receptacle (fig. C), the corn stands (fig. D), hay stacks (fig. E), the cattle sheds (fig. F), and the dunghill (fig. 4).

 

[dreamtime]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: dreamtime
Date: 2019-01-27 15:18:54
Reaction Score: 1

that's kind of funny. excellent find.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: welkyn
Date: 2019-01-27 16:34:39
Reaction Score: 1

That would be one for the books - "Stonehenge turns out to be ancient food processing plant."

 

[Timeshifter]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Timeshifter
Date: 2019-04-17 09:58:25
Reaction Score: 3

Just come across this on the BBC (British brainwashing corp)

'The ancestors of the people who built Stonehenge travelled west across the Mediterranean before reaching Britain, a study has shown.

Researchers compared DNA extracted from Neolithic human remains found across Britain with that of people alive at the same time in Europe.

The Neolithic inhabitants appear to have travelled from Anatolia (modern Turkey) to Iberia before winding their way north.

They reached Britain in about 4,000BC'

Stone henge was Probably built around 3000bc (And refurbed in the 50s )

I wonder why this story today?

Stone Henge fairytail

 

[codis]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: codis
Date: 2019-04-17 10:23:02
Reaction Score: 2

a study has shown.

Having an interest in health-related issues (a field littered with "studies"), the first question should be: Who did it, and who paid for it ?
History needs to match the current agenda, being it the bible, or "all humans are equal" doctrine.

(And refurbed in the 50s )

Funny that you mention it - I remember whitnessing the refurbishments of a few local "historical memorials" over the years. Even ruins were "rebuilt".
Like a local robber knight castle, supposedly from the 15.th century, which got rebuilt during the "Kraft durch Freude" job-creation measure in the Third Reich (1930s), and a similar program again in the 1990s.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2019-04-17 11:59:25
Reaction Score: 6

Ahem.
Take a wander through these pictures; Looked like the Stonehenge to the twentieth century | Earth Chronicles News
These are my favourites from the many on that page.

And those on this site; Do These Photos Prove Stonehenge Was Built In The 1950s?

Again my favourite.

And just remembered this one painted by some bloke called Constable in 1835; Stonehenge | John Constable | V&A Search the Collections

 

[Juzzer]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Juzzer
Date: 2019-04-18 06:55:19
Reaction Score: 5

@Timeshifter, I saw this too.. was about to post it myself. Are we finally seeing the mainstream view point catching up? I’m not sure they’ll actually amend the history books, I’m crazy for suggesting such things.. But it does gives us a lot of credibility now, some of my friends are actually asking me about this now who normally shy away

Is the release of so much information an attempt to breakdown religion? I mean how many people do you think become religious after finding out about who the real gods are? This path usually leads one down the path of enlightenment and spirituality, would this not be deemed a path in need of control?

With the notion of a one world religion and the symbolical nature of recent upsetting transgressions with Notre Dame Cathedral and the Al-Asqa Mosque in Jerusalem.. if I’m not mistaken both sit on very ancient temples to Isis, I can’t help but think they’re moving things forward

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Obertryn
Date: 2019-04-18 11:26:16
Reaction Score: 2

@Timeshifter, I saw this too.. was about to post it myself. Are we finally seeing the mainstream view point catching up? I’m not sure they’ll actually amend the history books, I’m crazy for suggesting such things.. But it does gives us a lot of credibility now, some of my friends are actually asking me about this now who normally shy away

Is the release of so much information an attempt to breakdown religion? I mean how many people do you think become religious after finding out about who the real gods are? This path usually leads one down the path of enlightenment and spirituality, would this not be deemed a path in need of control?

With the notion of a one world religion and the symbolical nature of recent upsetting transgressions with Notre Dame Cathedral and the Al-Asqa Mosque in Jerusalem.. if I’m not mistaken both sit on very ancient temples to Isis, I can’t help but think they’re moving things forward

I remember coming across a theory posted by some bloke on a 90's-looking website which suggested that all human religions are in fact beliefs that were passed down from ancient aliens. So, very ancient humans, before some advanced civilizations flew down from the sky or whatever, were happy worshiping ancestors and trees or whatever else and were then introduced to the concept of the one whole divine. His "evidence" was the sudden emergence onto the historical scene of complex religions out of virtually nothing. He also pointed out that even aside from the Abrahamic religions, most other belief systems tend to have a "supreme God" who rules over the others and is responsible for creation and control over the world. He claimed that what happened was that humans inherited the "one true God" belief system from aliens but also incorporated the aliens themselves into the religions as "gods". So, effectively the existence of a belief in a supreme creator was the byproduct of alien colonizers' beliefs in a supreme creator that they introduced to/forced upon the human population. Kind of how voodoo is a combination of native beliefs mashed with Christianity.

I really wish I could find it again, it was really, really freaking old, straight out of the early World Wide Web days, with a messed-up color scheme that made stuff hard to read but it was a fascinating text. I was a teenager then, so I thought it was just a wacky conspiracy. Was still kind of amusing thinking about Klingon-looking space travelers praying to God in some kind of alien church. And to answer your other question, I don't think TPTB care about religion much anyway. The Church/Imams as a tool of power are long beyond their usefulness date, as we can see the modern media and such freely bashing away at them, with hedonistic materialism as the new and far more efficient tool for keeping people in line.

 

[Juzzer]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Juzzer
Date: 2019-04-18 17:01:32
Reaction Score: 2

@Obertryn, That reminds me of the mini series Childhoods End that was on a few years back, if you haven’t seen this you should make it top of your list.. it’s crap but appropriate

Alien gods theory is as good as any other theory and probably my more favoured one

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: milhaus
Date: 2019-04-18 20:30:20
Reaction Score: 3

@Obertryn, That reminds me of the mini series Childhoods End that was on a few years back, if you haven’t seen this you should make it top of your list.. it’s crap but appropriate

Alien gods theory is as good as any other theory and probably my more favoured one

I would sometimes think that what if each age/cycle has different rules on how to "win" or to leave this realm.
Then things get reset and a new game and ways to win are established for the souls that lost the last game...except that for this cycle "they" somehow survived the last reset and have given us the levels, goals, final bosses, etc from all the previous cycles and nothing of what would help us win the game for this cycle.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: lostcause
Date: 2019-05-20 05:52:05
Reaction Score: 11

Here is another article saying the same thing: How They Rebuilt Stonehenge 50 Years Ago

'What we have been looking at is a 20th Century landscape, which is reminiscent of what Stonehenge MIGHT have been like thousands of years ago. It has been created by the heritage industry and is NOT the creation of prehistoric people. What we saw at the Millennium is less than 50 years old.'

And, in 1901, as the builders went to work, The Times letters column was full of bucolic missives of complaint. But the first stage of 'restoration' thundered ahead regardless and the style guru of the day, John Ruskin, released the maxim which was to outlive him.... 'Restoration is a lie,' he stormed. Nevertheless the Stonehenge makeover was to gather momentum and more work was carried out in 1919, 1920, 1958, 1959 and 1964. Christopher Chippindale, curator at the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and Anthropology, and author of Stonehenge Complete, admits: 'Nearly all the stones have been moved in some way and are standing in concrete.'

A stone was straightened and set in concrete in 1901, six further stones in 1919 and 1920, three more in 1959 and four in 1964. There was also the excavation of the Altar stone and re-erection of the Trilithon in 1958.

'The news is sensational,' said Mr Edwards, a decorate student at the University of the West of England. 'Once I realised how much work had been carried out, I was amazed to discover that practically no-one outside of the henge know of its reconstruction in the last 100 years. I have always thought that if people are bothering to make a trip to Stonehenge, from home or abroad, then the least they should expect is a true story.'

My thoughts: I'm kind of shocked at this. Stonehenge is a fraud. I visited Stonehenge in 2004 and didn't hear anything about this. Maybe why the tourists aren't allowed up close is so they won't see evidence of the concrete and chipped rocks. If something of this magnitude happened within the last 60-70 years, what else are we being lied to about?

 

[Starman]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Starman
Date: 2019-05-21 05:23:28
Reaction Score: 14

My thoughts: I'm kind of shocked at this. Stonehenge is a fraud. I visited Stonehenge in 2004 and didn't hear anything about this. Maybe why the tourists aren't allowed up close is so they won't see evidence of the concrete and chipped rocks. If something of this magnitude happened within the last 60-70 years, what else are we being lied to about?

Though it is disturbing to realize we have been fooled, we at least have the consolation that we now see how the game is played. For some reason many of us 'normal humans' are under the delusion that most people are impartial, well meaning, and honest. We can't imagine that somebody would purposely obfuscate or fabricate a story about important historical events. We are like children in our outlook. That is the beauty of humanity, its innocence and trusting nature, but it is also our perennial weakness.

Better to wake up and be disappointed than be under someone's spell. All of us in this forum have pretty much woken up from this delusion.

The world is run by psychopaths and they stop at nothing to fabricate a narrative, any narrative to sway the masses. This is actually what history is comprised of. It is somebody's story, an interpretation, a cobbled together drama meant to capture attention and steer people into a matrix of belief. Don't fall for it!

 

[Timeshifter]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Timeshifter
Date: 2019-07-12 13:29:02
Reaction Score: 2

We all know that famous Stonehenge was built a very long time ago. Archaeologists believe it was constructed from 3000 BC to 2000 BC. And this is what it looks like today. The surrounding circular earth bank and ditch, which constitute the earliest phase of the monument, have been dated to about 3100 BC. Radiocarbon dating suggests that the first blue stones were raised between 2400 and 2200 BC although they may have been at the site as early as 3000 BC. One of the most famous landmarks in the UK, Stonehenge is regarded as a British cultural icon. It has been a legally protected Scheduled Ancient Monument since 1882 when legislation to protect historic monuments was first successfully introduced in Britain.

View attachment 128

And for something that old it is perfectly understandable to undergo some maintenance here and there, and now and then. But once again some evidence suggests that things might not be exactly what they appear to be. For example some of the earliest engravings show Stonehenge looking very different.

View attachment 129View attachment 130

Somebody who knows better then the artist, stated this: Although the artist almost certainly visited Stonehenge during the course of his travels as a map-maker, this picture seems to have been influenced strongly by early pictures of the monument. The stones are topped with ‘sausage roll’ shaped lintels and the background details are wrong. The spire of Salisbury Cathedral may have been introduced by Speed to emphasise the location of Stonehenge.

Yet, that same very John Speed (the author of the second engraving) is being described by the same web source as: John Speed is best known for his county maps of Britain. They were incredibly accurate and very detailed. The maps still provide historians with a lot of information about early seventeenth Britain. The maps are also quite beautiful and Speed's skill as an artist is shown is his drawings. Some of these illustrated books by other people, some of them formed vignettes, or scenes, in the corners of the maps.

More information about John Speed can be found on Wikipedia.

The above engravings present us with the location which looks nothing like the Stonehenge of today. Terrain looks very different. Where did the hills come from? What are those buildings in the background? Of course it is very easy to ridicule the contemporary artist who has no credibility issues.

There is some compelling evidence that the Stonehenge of today was reconstructed fairly recently in 1954. Judging for ourselves is an option we have. The official version is the other option of course. It's for the observer to decide what is more real.

View attachment 131View attachment 132View attachment 133View attachment 134View attachment 135View attachment 136View attachment 137View attachment 138View attachment 139View attachment 140View attachment 141View attachment 142View attachment 143View attachment 144View attachment 145View attachment 146View attachment 147View attachment 148View attachment 149View attachment 150View attachment 151View attachment 152View attachment 153View attachment 154View attachment 156View attachment 157View attachment 158View attachment 159View attachment 160View attachment 161View attachment 162View attachment 163View attachment 164View attachment 155

And what is that thing inside one of the Stonehenge stones?

View attachment 165

There are more pictures at this foreign language site covering the topic.

The engravings from the very old books suggest that the Stonehenge did exist. They also provides us with a very different landscape. And while the official version of this provocative photos is probably some sort of renovation non-sense, I have my own opinion on the issue.

View attachment 149

I think that original Stonehenge did not quite make it to our times. And recreation paid off. This is a very popular tourist attraction.

Thus it exists once again. Don't ask me why it was backdated to 3000 BC to 2000 BC. 5000 years this way, or 5000 years that way. Who cares? We have a historical attraction. And probably some made up history in the process. What else is new?

Heres the latest twaddle from academia...

I love this quote in the artical

'Stonehenge is, of course, a monument built roughly 5,000 years ago by Neolithic people for unknown reasons—they left behind no written records'

you have to laugh, anyway,

Scholars have built a mini SH to see how human voices would sound, 5000 years ago....

'The researchers explored what a human voice would have sounded like inside the monument during its heyday. To find out, they applied a modern technique that has been used to help architects build concert halls with optimal sound characteristics. The technique involves building a small-scale model of a building prior to construction and blasting sounds at it at 12 times their normal frequency in a sound chamber to overcome the size differences.

To replicate the technique for Stonehenge, the researchers 3-D printed each of the stones and used them to make silicon molds that were then filled with a plaster-polymer mix. Each of the stones was painted and then placed in its original position within the monument. The result was a 1:12 scale model of the original monument—the tallest model stone was just 60 centimeters'

It goes on...

'They note that despite large spaces between the stones, a person's voice would have reverberated around the monument, producing an echoing effect. They also suggest it is not likely that the people who built the monument knew what impact it would have on a speaker's voice, but point out that it seems likely they would have taken advantage of the impressive acoustics'

Link Mini-model of Stonehenge reveals how voices would have carried in original ancient monument

I think it is more likely that in the 1950s when it was built as a tourist attraction, nobody gave a stuff about the sound, but by pushing out this audio narrative, the mases remain brainwashed into the 5000 years fairy tail.

Thoughts?

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Aply1985
Date: 2019-07-12 16:10:22
Reaction Score: 3

Rebuilt to hide some bigger structure
If look lidar maps Stonehenge area there are a lot of old structures much more comlicated than Stonehenge

LIDAR Map of England and Wales, UK

 

[irishbalt]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: irishbalt
Date: 2019-07-12 19:06:03
Reaction Score: 1

I remember coming across a theory posted by some bloke on a 90's-looking website which suggested that all human religions are in fact beliefs that were passed down from ancient aliens. So, very ancient humans, before some advanced civilizations flew down from the sky or whatever, were happy worshiping ancestors and trees or whatever else and were then introduced to the concept of the one whole divine. His "evidence" was the sudden emergence onto the historical scene of complex religions out of virtually nothing. He also pointed out that even aside from the Abrahamic religions, most other belief systems tend to have a "supreme God" who rules over the others and is responsible for creation and control over the world. He claimed that what happened was that humans inherited the "one true God" belief system from aliens but also incorporated the aliens themselves into the religions as "gods". So, effectively the existence of a belief in a supreme creator was the byproduct of alien colonizers' beliefs in a supreme creator that they introduced to/forced upon the human population. Kind of how voodoo is a combination of native beliefs mashed with Christianity.

I really wish I could find it again, it was really, really freaking old, straight out of the early World Wide Web days, with a messed-up color scheme that made stuff hard to read but it was a fascinating text. I was a teenager then, so I thought it was just a wacky conspiracy. Was still kind of amusing thinking about Klingon-looking space travelers praying to God in some kind of alien church. And to answer your other question, I don't think TPTB care about religion much anyway. The Church/Imams as a tool of power are long beyond their usefulness date, as we can see the modern media and such freely bashing away at them, with hedonistic materialism as the new and far more efficient tool for keeping people in line.

Religion unfortunately can be a mask for unregulated predation towards the purpose of hedonistic materialism.

Long video, perhaps scan to the last 20 mins

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: HulkSmash
Date: 2019-07-12 19:48:32
Reaction Score: 1

And what is that thing inside one of the Stonehenge stones?

When at Stonehenge two weeks ago, I asked the guide about this specific stone. He replied it is a massive metal wedge they had to jam in there to hold it up because it apparently was eroding a giant hole inside and they were afraid it would fall. So we know at least with that one stone, things have been messed around within a modern setting.

 

[Timeshifter]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Timeshifter
Date: 2019-07-29 19:07:27
Reaction Score: 3

More stone henge proof....

'Shards of pottery found at the nearby Durrington Walls have long been known to contain pig fat, but it is often assumed to be used for cooking.

However, now archaeologists are putting forth the idea that lard was an ingredient for the construction of Stonehenge in a study published in the Antiquity journal'

Lard, the neolithic mans superglue!



Lard

 

[anotherlayer]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: anotherlayer
Date: 2019-07-29 23:55:22
Reaction Score: 5

My thoughts: I'm kind of shocked at this. Stonehenge is a fraud. I visited Stonehenge in 2004 and didn't hear anything about this. Maybe why the tourists aren't allowed up close is so they won't see evidence of the concrete and chipped rocks. If something of this magnitude happened within the last 60-70 years, what else are we being lied to about?

I too was at Stonehenge around that same time and never heard a peep of this reconstruction. Here is a picture I took that shows all the secrets.

 

[KD Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2019-08-27 22:08:55
Reaction Score: 2

TPTB is building the Stonehenge!