- Joined
- Aug 22, 2022
- Messages
- 116
- Reaction score
- 250
"The Gerries" was a name for the adversaries of the Britons in WW2. But who were they?
The usual explanation is that it was derived from the "Germans", but the phonetic sound of the words is different. There were other names for the German foe e.g Fritz, the Hun, so why call them something based on their country, but pronounced incorrectly? How did the Brits go from ruling the world, so to speak, to being ignorantly cloth-eared with our neighbours?
A more likely explanation may be found in the only words in the English language that start with "Gerry" - namely, forms of the word "gerrymander".
To "gerrymander" is to "manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favour one party or class". This appears to be one of the primary functions of the current political system, which indicates that, contrary to popular opinion, the Gerries actually won the war. UK Plc. is born of rotten boroughs, and this fine tradition is being carried on to this day.
This points towards the English (British) Civil War being much more recent than the story books relate, and supports the theory that British history has been disaggregated. My current thinking is that the true Brits lost the civil war to the bureaucratic Gerries, and the Gerries immediately used the conquered people and land to wage further war against nearby Europeans. The World Wars are essentially the same war, with one being an extension of the other by the victors; so the Civil War culminated in WWI.
The usual explanation is that it was derived from the "Germans", but the phonetic sound of the words is different. There were other names for the German foe e.g Fritz, the Hun, so why call them something based on their country, but pronounced incorrectly? How did the Brits go from ruling the world, so to speak, to being ignorantly cloth-eared with our neighbours?
A more likely explanation may be found in the only words in the English language that start with "Gerry" - namely, forms of the word "gerrymander".
To "gerrymander" is to "manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favour one party or class". This appears to be one of the primary functions of the current political system, which indicates that, contrary to popular opinion, the Gerries actually won the war. UK Plc. is born of rotten boroughs, and this fine tradition is being carried on to this day.
This points towards the English (British) Civil War being much more recent than the story books relate, and supports the theory that British history has been disaggregated. My current thinking is that the true Brits lost the civil war to the bureaucratic Gerries, and the Gerries immediately used the conquered people and land to wage further war against nearby Europeans. The World Wars are essentially the same war, with one being an extension of the other by the victors; so the Civil War culminated in WWI.