SH Archive 1969 Soyuz-4 and 5, Earth from space, no fisheye lens, and flat horizon

SH.org OP Username
KorbenDallas
SH.org OP Date
2018-08-20 04:47:08
SH.org Reaction Score
17
SH.org Reply Count
17

KD Archive

Not actually KorbenDallas
Active Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2020
Messages
4,691
Reaction score
1,499
Was sent this video of Russian astronauts in the near Earth orbit in 1969. I would not go as far as considering it space, but they appear to be up there. They are clearly not using no fish eye lens, and the horizon looks pretty flat. Hence I have two questions.

08:29-08:40 and 17:22-18:40

1. Why these days astronauts use fisheye lens in space, when they know that they are being heavily criticized for that?

flat_earth_from_space_2.pngflat_earth_from_space_3.pngflat_earth_from_space_4.pngflat_earth_from_space_5.png

2. For my personal education. What island is that?

08:35
08-35 earth from space.png

Google image search tells me it's a woodpecker :unsure:

woodpecker.png
Note: This OP was recovered from the KeeperOfTheKnowledge archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Magnus
Date: 2018-08-20 12:13:04
Reaction Score: 0
Look at that grid lines. Where is this image of earth? Can you find on google earth the perfect grid lines?

Thats the top of a sewer grate, not earth.

Look at the perfect grid lines, 90 degree angles intersecting.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Dirigible
Date: 2018-08-20 14:55:09
Reaction Score: 1
@KorbenDallas , thanks for that video... I paused it a few times, got a ruler out placed it at the end points to see if it was truly straight or if there was any curve... completely unscientific, I know, but what else do we have.

Based on this unscientific test, there is a very very VERY slight convex curve... and it could be just due to light reflection.

@Magnus .... those gridlines are part of the camera so that measurements to scale could be made.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-08-20 15:08:25
Reaction Score: 0
What do you make of it? Any thoughts?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Dirigible
Date: 2018-08-20 15:10:15
Reaction Score: 2
Earth is either flat or a f*ck ton bigger that we ever were led to believe. At that height, the curve should be obvious, even in the narrow view we have in the video. I do believe that video might rule out concave earth.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-08-20 17:19:35
Reaction Score: 0
Any ideas what that Island is, and where it’s at?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Bumi.Rata
Date: 2018-08-20 17:47:46
Reaction Score: 1
1500 years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was the center of the universe. 500 years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was flat. And 15 minutes ago, you knew that people were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow.... Agent K (Men in Black)

Heliocentric started by Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) around 500 years ago. Before that, it was Geocentric.

You may download "" for the pdf.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Dirigible
Date: 2018-08-20 18:10:37
Reaction Score: 1
Well, according to this (only flight path info I can find, and it looks to be more modern), looks like it could be in the northern part of Japan. Can't find the flightpath for the other part of the Earth realm.



That last link "200 proofs" is broken, can you link elsewhere?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-08-20 18:19:52
Reaction Score: 1
To be that huge from low Earth otbit it has to be pretty big. This google-christened Woodpecker Island has to be fairly big. I look at maps all the time and it does not ring a bell at all. It has a very distinctive shape. I’m real interested to find out where it’s at.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Bumi.Rata
Date: 2018-08-20 18:25:57
Reaction Score: 1
Sorry... The link is actually active, just need login.
I have upload the .pdf files into my previous post. You can download it directly from there.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: humanoidlord
Date: 2018-08-23 01:10:39
Reaction Score: 0
wait i am confused, din't you say that man has never been to space before
also there is a curvature here, very small but existent
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-08-23 01:45:51
Reaction Score: 0
How far up does space start in your understanding?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-08-23 02:01:19
Reaction Score: 0
Officially yes. That’s what everyone is thinking when they hear the word Space... 60 miles above Earth.

Anyways, and how high are those guys in the video, because I do not really know. They claim they are in space, but how high are they really?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: humanoidlord
Date: 2018-08-23 17:25:49
Reaction Score: 0
they must be in orbit otherwise they would just fall down
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-08-26 19:05:50
Reaction Score: 1
I've never believed that earth was a spinning ball but for the electromagnetic field we DO have on earth, likely something is spinning to create it. Inner earth? May also account for tectonic plates and why our Pangea spun apart at the weak spots creating separate continents. Centrifugal force.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Timeshifter
Date: 2019-01-06 10:46:02
Reaction Score: 1
I would say the use of wide angle lens by all space agencies is to perpeptuate the people debating the flat/globe through argument over their fake cgi imagery. While ever we are stuck in these arguments wider questions in general do not get asked (outside of forums such as SH) if there is doubt, people in the main tend to side with the official narrative.

A slight asside..Notice how much debris? Is floating by on the video, especially at the 17.20 - 18.40 part.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top