Alex Jones is really Bill Hicks?

There are multiple lookalike celebrities. And the case that one may be the other seems strong.
There's the Amy Winehouse/Lady Gaga, John F Kennedy/Jimmy Carter, Kurt Cobain/Rivers Cuomo, Jimi Hendrix/Morgan Freeman, Ted Bundy/George W. Bush, and others.
However, many living celebrities also look virtually identical. Such as Jamie Pressly/Margot Robbie, Ryan Gosling/Ryan Reynolds, Jennifer Lawrence/(Young) Helen Mirren, Pee Wee Herman/Larry Nasser etc.
One possible explanation is simply that these people simply come from the same small group of families. Supposedly "unrelated" people are in fact very closely related, and their resemblances to each other is because they are family.
Or it could be there may be some sort of cloning. I would have laughed at that idea until recently, but now I'm not so sure.
 
There are multiple lookalike celebrities. And the case that one may be the other seems strong.
There's the Amy Winehouse/Lady Gaga, John F Kennedy/Jimmy Carter, Kurt Cobain/Rivers Cuomo, Jimi Hendrix/Morgan Freeman, Ted Bundy/George W. Bush, and others.
However, many living celebrities also look virtually identical. Such as Jamie Pressly/Margot Robbie, Ryan Gosling/Ryan Reynolds, Jennifer Lawrence/(Young) Helen Mirren, Pee Wee Herman/Larry Nasser etc.
One possible explanation is simply that these people simply come from the same small group of families. Supposedly "unrelated" people are in fact very closely related, and their resemblances to each other is because they are family.
Or it could be there may be some sort of cloning. I would have laughed at that idea until recently, but now I'm not so sure.

If the age gap between the two are close, then it could also be one person playing two people that are still alive. Unlike in this case, where the Bill Hicks character was killed off so he could play the biggest controlled opposition agents in the "alternative" news for 2 and a half decades.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe after all these years people are still promoting this theory and that people still believe this theory...the age difference alone refutes this...there's no doubt Alex Jones is CIA controlled Op and Hicks likely was controlled Op to a lesser extent but they are not the same person...anyone can photoshop little nuances like moles and teeth...seen it done many times...if you want a good description of Alex Jones and his CIA connects, a Dutch Journalist did a great job of exposing that already...https://isgp-studies.com/alex-jones-of-infowars-is-cia-army-disinformation
 
  • Like
Reactions: Six
I can't believe after all these years people are still promoting this theory and that people still believe this theory...the age difference alone refutes this...there's no doubt Alex Jones is CIA controlled Op and Hicks likely was controlled Op to a lesser extent but they are not the same person...anyone can photoshop little nuances like moles and teeth...seen it done many times...if you want a good description of Alex Jones and his CIA connects, a Dutch Journalist did a great job of exposing that already...https://isgp-studies.com/alex-jones-of-infowars-is-cia-army-disinformation
Clarification request
TLDR: Could you explain what is meant by by the age alone refuting the theory that Jones and Hicks are the same actor (if I'm reading correctly)?

Detail
To be clear, the "age difference" between Hicks and Jones has been used up thread to help support (not refute) the idea that Hicks and Jones and Hicks are the same actor. To summarize, according to Wikipedia:
  • Jones was born 1974-02-11, so 48 years old today in March, 2022.
  • Hicks was born 1961-12-16, so 60 years old today in March, 2022.
A recent Alex Jones Show video [0] from around 2020-03-10 can be used for reference, with stills below (click for larger size, which adds years in my view):
guess-jones-age.png
Aside on early dismissal of topic
I agree that the Jones-Hicks topic might seem silly and is possibly a wasteful distraction, and I dismissed it previously, too, but, if true, this character swap would be interesting to acknowledge for its notability factor alone, IMO. Also, since the very nature (content, presentation) of the Jones element causes some to "have a dismissal reflex", doubling down on inspecting this topic might be worthwhile.

On possible editing
Regarding whether the teeth and moles could have been edited into the images and videos up thread, it's true that the lineage of the footage wasn't provided AFAICT, and this editing or footage-sourcing topic does seem worthy of possible followup.

[0]
View: https://rumble.com/vx28fx-see-the-proof-of-us-funded-biolabs-in-ukraine-you-were-told-didnt-exist.html
 
Last edited:
Clarification request
TLDR: Could you explain what is meant by by the age alone refuting the theory that Jones and Hicks are the same actor (if I'm reading correctly)?

Detail
To be clear, the "age difference" between Hicks and Jones has been used up thread to help support (not refute) the idea that Hicks and Jones and Hicks are the same actor. To summarize, according to Wikipedia:
  • Jones was born 1974-02-11, so 48 years old today in March, 2022.
  • Hicks was born 1961-12-16, so 60 years old today in March, 2022.
A recent Alex Jones Show video [0] from around 2020-03-10 can be used for reference, with stills below (click for larger size, which adds years in my view):
Aside on early dismissal of topic
I agree that the Jones-Hicks topic might seems silly and is possibly a wasteful distraction, and I dismissed it previously, too, but, if true, this character swap would be interesting to acknowledge for its notability factor alone, IMO. Also, since the very nature (content, presentation) of the Jones element causes some to "have a dismissal reflex", doubling down on inspecting this topic might be worthwhile.

On possible editing
Regarding of whether the teeth and moles could have been edited into the images and videos up thread, it's true that the lineage of the footage wasn't provided AFAICT, and this editing or footage-sourcing topic does seem worthy of possible followup.

[0]
View: https://rumble.com/vx28fx-see-the-proof-of-us-funded-biolabs-in-ukraine-you-were-told-didnt-exist.html

Personally I think 12 years is a significant age difference especially looking at Hicks when he passed away in his mid 30s opposed to a younger AJ who was early 20s. Regardless I agree people have a quick dismissal reflex and I am always open to investigating most things presented to me. No one loves finding a good conspiracy more than me but i simply don’t see this one at all. Especially if you read the link about Jones family I think you will see he himself was groomed for this position. However I would be happy to be wrong if he was Bill Hicks but yea I just can’t see this theory having any merit.
 
Personally I think 12 years is a significant age difference especially looking at Hicks when he passed away in his mid 30s opposed to a younger AJ who was early 20s. Regardless I agree people have a quick dismissal reflex and I am always open to investigating most things presented to me. No one loves finding a good conspiracy more than me but i simply don’t see this one at all. Especially if you read the link about Jones family I think you will see he himself was groomed for this position. However I would be happy to be wrong if he was Bill Hicks but yea I just can’t see this theory having any merit.
Thank you for clarifying. So, roughly stated, the "age gap refutation hypothesis" states that the Hicks we have footage of was too old to "return" as the early "returned" Jones we have footage of. I'm not sure I agree, but I think I get the concept now.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for clarifying. So, roughly stated, the "age gap refutation hypothesis" states that the Hicks we have footage of was too old to "return" as the early "returned" Jones we have footage of. I'm not sure I agree, but I think I get the concept now.

I am not saying Hicks is definitely Jones, but I will say this, I think the new Jones looks to be within a year or two of how old Hicks would be. Therefore, if it's not Hicks, himself, it's a man that is very close in age, he is certainly not as young as the DOB listed for the original Jones. That much is completely clear to me.
 
This video was good but after looking into the author's 'production' I have to say that it's not believable. Or at least that he
tries in every way not to be taken seriously.
This is his account: https://twitter.com/dallasgoldbug

This video was good but after looking into the author's 'production' I have to say that it's not believable. Or at least that he
tries in every way not to be taken seriously.
This is his account: https://twitter.com/dallasgoldbug
Old DallisGOLDbug is a "black washing" psyop. When the word GOLD is included in a name think of jewelry as the group behind it. In the beginning of his video series, he makes solid connections between separate "actors" and presents good info. Then later he presents data that is inconsistent and purposely incorrect to raise doubt. He is there to lead and then eventually sabotage this line of inquiry. Alex Jones is Bill Hicks. He has the mannerisms of Bill Hicks. There's another parallel: their both trannies. They both have short necks and sloping shoulders of a woman. Alex has turned into a pudgy overweight woman now. Alex's rants are legendary and it also fits Bill Hicks comedic rants. During the Cult Covaids Project Jones said he would resort to cannibalism to feed his family! Swallow that black pill you NPC's. We have seen they use a limited amount of crisis actors for the fake shooting events and many recycled actors have shown up over and over again. When you watch Jone's earlier work he's right on the money but he would take actions to discredit himself making "conspiracy theory" a line of questioning to be rediculed by the NPC's. Oh your just like Alex Jones the normies would say when presented by info that went against the main steam narrative. That was his job to "black wash" the conspiracy movement.
 
...anyone can photoshop little nuances like moles and teeth...seen it done many times...
Regarding whether the teeth and moles could have been edited into the images and videos up thread, it's true that the lineage of the footage wasn't provided AFAICT, and this editing or footage-sourcing topic does seem worthy of possible followup.
On same-teeth 1) possible image manipulation, 2) photo source/lineage, and 3) replication of similarity findings

Update regarding lineage of photos showing remarkably similar teeth: it is at least possible to find photos of Hicks and Jones showing their teeth, in which the teeth look notably similar in many respects, on the pages of the photographers credited with the photos.

Implications:
  • If there were to be image manipulation going on to falsely make the teeth look similar, the ruse would necessarily be more complex than an unscrupulous, traffic-hungry Youtuber or conspiracy blogger photoshopping the same teeth so that they match in both Jones and Hicks.
    • It sure looks like there are real photographers taking credit for real photos of Hicks and Jones showing similar teeth.
      • Of course, one of the photographers indicated below might be fake, or compromised themselves, but there does not appear to be evidence as such at this time.
Exhibit A: Saunders' photo of Hicks
Photographer Chris Saunders posted a Hicks photo to his Flickr account and also held the following exchange in Flickr comments:
Phil Gribbon 15y
you took pictures of Bill Hicks? You're my new favourite Sheffield photographer

Chris Saunders 15y
Aye I did & thanks - I'm honoured! ;)

2015-07-15_dated, (via regmedia.co.uk), bill_hicks_by_chris_saunders.jpg

Teethy Hicks Photo Positively Attributable to Photographer ("Saunders")

Exhibit B: Humpreys' photo of Jones
Photographer Brent Humphreys hosts on his website a Jones photo on that was used by Esquire:
Brent Humphreys is a freelance editorial and commercial photographer based in Austin, Texas.

brent humphreys, (cargocollective.com via brenthumphreys.com) alex1.jpg

Teethy Jones Photo Positively Attributable to Photographer ("Humphreys")

The comparison image
In the below comparison, the image scales are intentionally not adjusted from the original image sources in order to minimize manipulation and maintain original detail as much as feasible. Hopefully, one's mind will do the autoscaling well enough. Also, the similarities are unhighlighted (but the upthread content did a decent job IIRC).

compare-bh-aj-teeth-photos-sourced-from-chris-saunders-and-bret-humphreys-photography-pages.jpg

Sourced originals and easy comparison

Spotting the similarities and differences, explaining each, and drawing conclusions are an exercise left to the reader. To my untrained eyes, they look like the same teeth with slight cosmetic dentistry work on some edges.
Undone
It might be worthwhile to find additional teeth shots, including from other photo shoots and by other photographers. But at least here's some attribution and lineage, which I had not seen before (but could have missed).
 
Last edited:
weeks before his assassination (which was probably more related to 9/11, not Alex Jones), legendary Bill Cooper exposes Alex Jones as a liar:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JskEUfGBijg



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL7p5h0zJgI


Another vid on Alex Jones as Bill Hicks (video may be meant to be a bit satirical, but difficult to tell):


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lH_xFtDM0X0

The thing with the orange drink is hilarious when you think about it.


View: https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000006070750/inside-alex-joness-tangy-tangerine-fueled-empire.html
 
Back
Top