Antarctica maps and photos

[Jd755]

The biggest clue they are fakes is the lack of quality compared to these photographs from the same expedition.

Rare photographs of Robert Scott's ill-fated expedition to the South Pole, 1910-1913 - Rare Historical Photos

 

[Quiahuitl]

The biggest clue they are fakes is the lack of quality compared to these photographs from the same expedition.

Rare photographs of Robert Scott's ill-fated expedition to the South Pole, 1910-1913 - Rare Historical Photos

The photos from Fulford have only 600 x 600 pixels compared to 1600 x 1600 for the link you posted.

This one, which we are assuming to be a real photo of Scott, has similar quality to the ones I posted.

This one is interesting, the Sun seems to be high in the sky. You can see shadow in the front of the top sail and the back of the jibs. I'm assuming the jibs are blowing away from us. The Sun can't be at an elevation of more than 50 degrees in Antarctica, if my interpretation of the standard spinning ball model is correct.

Interpretation of shadows in photos is highly subjective, of course.

Edit - There is light on the left side of the bow as we look at it (starboard) and shadow on the port side, to the right of the prow as we look at it. Then further to the right the side of the ship appears illuminated again. I can't understand that at all.

 

[Jd755]

Reflections from water and the ice play a much greater role in the lighting of such images than is often understood. They reflect light into what should be shadows thus confusing the eye used to unidirectional light in natural conditions.

As to the 600 versus 1600 DPI digital limitations. The original imagery from the expedition is on 10 x 8 glass plates which capture detail digital can only dream of.
None of these are available as tifs as far as I know. The tif being the highest quality digital image format.

Here you go best source I have found.
Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge » Picture Library catalogue

 

[ViniB]

So they as in whover invented the theory, emain as anonymous as ever but at the link it reveals a team academics posted a paper on a theory and you missed the theory part out from your " they say"post!

"A paper published by an international team of U.S. and Australian investigators led by John Goodge, an NSF-funded researcher with the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Minnesota-Duluth, gives significant support to the theory."

Great, another theory by a guy who's balls deep within every mainstream quackademia theory available, even the space lie and search for Life "in the stars"........ i woudn't be surprised if he turns out to be a member of the hidden hand club

 

[Referent]

Does this look AI generated to you?

Not particularly, though it doesn't mean much.

• As TruthIsOnlyDelayed astutely pointed out, I do find it a bit strange how the row of buildings on the left appears to squish in perspective as they get closer to the grand top-center building (and then, the continuation behind the grand building does not appear to necessarily follow the same perspective lines).
• Specifically, this "Bristol" image does not have so much of the "lower color depth smearing" AI effect (best way I can describe it subjectively) that stood out a bit as characteristic throughout multiple of the images in the OP, as I recall.

 

[Quiahuitl]

I am not sure I can say AI or not but something that appears off to me is how easily discernible the signage of the buildings that stick out over the sidewalk/ street below are down that road

On that same note now look towards the end of the road. You’ll see a sign for what looks to say “Willways Garage Garage”

Not particularly, though it doesn't mean much.

• As TruthIsOnlyDelayed astutely pointed out, I do find it a bit strange how the row of buildings on the left appears to squish in perspective as they get closer to the grand top-center building (and then, the continuation behind the grand building does not appear to necessarily follow the same perspective lines).
• Specifically, this "Bristol" image does not have so much of the "lower color depth smearing" AI effect (best way I can describe it subjectively) that stood out a bit as characteristic throughout multiple of the images in the OP, as I recall.

Thanks for your replies. I can't find the 'Willways Garage' you are referring to, where is that please?

The thing I find odd about this photo is there are plenty of verticals in it that are perfectly aligned. The distant building at the right of the frame about two thirds of the way up; and the building at the left of the frame also 2/3rds way up look perfectly aligned to me - which is what a professional photographer does.

However the 'Tartarian' building's verticals are pointing outwards as if it was photographed from above.

This photo came from the attic of my friend's mother's house in Bristol which we just cleared out recently, so I can be absolutely certain it's not an AI generated image. However something about it looks really weird to me. I've just spent a few hours looking in Bristol photo archives and can't find any other photos of this building.


This photo is from 1953 and shows what you would see if you were on top of the Tartarian building looking back towards the camera in the first photo. The grass area in the bottom left is above the river you can see in the first photo, that was covered over in c. 1938. The tram depot you see in the first photo would be at the top of the grassed area.

 

[uhauss]

I'm having trouble trusting a single solitary "old" map. The problem is, all or most typically display a real lack of accuracy, skills, or knowledge. If we believe the world once had techniques so advanced that we built the great structures and infrastructures such as illustrated in World's Fairs, then the idea that maps wouldn't be remarkably precise, especially for places where these fairs took place, is absurd. Either we are to believe the same peers were beyond brilliant with engineering and architecture but terrible with cartography, or we should believe that all current circulating maps have been produced specifically to deceive the bearer into believing ideas of progression: ideas that realities such as World's Fairs aptly dispel.

The same could be said with ancient coins, most look remarkable primitiv compared to the engineering and architectural skills.

 

[Just]

It's an interesting conundrum you have stumbled into.

While we could argue and infinitum about the authenticity of these photos, or the next set of hidden history photos, I am surprised no one here has noticed this....

What if there is no form to the UniVerse, but only structure? What if all that exists is consciousness, mental projections of each of our minds... If that is the case, then who is to say that even the 'real' photos and maps, are not sprung into existence by our minds too.

And if that is the case, then how are the real ones any different to the 'AI' ones?

This doesn’t really link to this post but I just wanted to make one point about the supposed coastline of the landmass of Antarctica. I was looking at the flags of the world (actually on the mug I’m currently drinking from!) and noticed that the flag of Antarctica is the only one that shows the actual ‘landmass’ of the ‘country’. It’s exactly as if this particular place only has validity if we believe it does. Am I wrong? I’d be interested to know if anyone else has seen a flag that does the same.

Antarctica Flag for sale | Buy Flag of Antarctica | The Flag Shop

 

[lisa12]

I don't know if anyone has mentioned this but now they say that there is evidence that Antarctica was once part of the USA.
I have always believed that Antarctica was actually the place where Atlantis is. Sorry if anyone has mentioned this already.
Supposedly when the dinosaurs roamed the earth there were no icecaps which leads me to believe that there were no North poles and South poles. The earth was once a place where the average temps were mild all over the globe and then something or somethings had happened to change all of that.

Someone also mentioned the Atlantic ridge, and I would like to mention that the Atlantic Ocean is actually quite a new Ocean in terms of the age of this earth and movement of the land masses. If you don't believe that continents move, just look California and Africa where you can actually visually see the evidence of the earth ripping apart.

I am hoping you are just not finding this out. This has been an accepted scientific theory for decades. Pangea and continental drift?

 

[Udjat]

I am hoping you are just not finding this out. This has been an accepted scientific theory for decades. Pangea and continental drift?

No I did not just find this out, but I thought I should mention it because most of the time what is well known "scientific theory" doesn't always fly well around here and I just wanted this to not be forgotten.

 

[Vulcani]

Very interesting photos. But where they are from? Who discovered these documents? What archive? If we do not know these facts, we can't understand.

I have not checked myself, but Jon Levi had to apologize and retract a video he made on these photos, saying they were actually products of the new AI art programs.

 

[lisa12]

No I did not just find this out, but I thought I should mention it because most of the time what is well known "scientific theory" doesn't always fly well around here and I just wanted this to not be forgotten.

Good point. Most scientific theory is scoffed around here in lieu of ridiculous ideas.

 

[mifletzet]

More antipodean fakery, or genuine?

ANTARCTICA - Unique photos from the expedition of Admiral Byrd

 

[alltheleaves]

Benjamin Fulford has published some photos from Scott's 1912 expedition to Antarctica. You can see the article here Benjamin Fulford Report: Gnostic illuminati’s promised world revolution unfolds - December 12, 2022 - Prepare For Change

You can see the photos here
https://prepareforchange.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Artic.pdf

Here are a few of the more interesting photos

View attachment 26743​

View attachment 26744​

View attachment 26745​

View attachment 26746​

View attachment 26747​

Fulford also published this map of the world which was created in 1530. This is the map room of the Palazzo Farnese in Rome. You can see it shows Antarctica green and with a land bridge to South America. I think it's safe to assume whoever created this map was a very wealthy man with a global trading empire.

View attachment 26749​

There was a debate on this forum the other day about Hancock's interpretation of the Piri Reis map. While I was searching the forum to see if this topic had already been covered, I discovered this letter from 1960 validating Hancock's interpretation. To see the original post click here
SH Archive - Antarctica: melting snow reveals ancient human settlement?

View attachment 26750​

Basic searching...The Palace was commissioned in 1513 by Alexander Farnese (1468-1549), who was subsequently elected Pope under the name of Paul III.

Currently nearing the end of a 99 year lease to France for their embassy to Italy.

 

[Truthseeker2468]

Is this a case of researchers getting too close to some type of truth so they are attempting to “flood the zone” with fake information to obfuscate potential truths?

I think your on to something here. Because people have exposed so many things through the art of photography, those who are “controlling” things want to cause people to loose faith in what they are seeing in the photos. So they muddy the waters to get people to doubt the authenticity of any photo they see that seems contrary to the narrative we been given. They did the same thing with the discovery of giant humanoid skeletons. There are a lot of authentic photographs and discoveries of giants but they insert forgeries to “flood the zone”. Like you said. I was researching this years ago and happened upon some articles about a contest to see who could produce the most real looking photograph of a giant human skeleton (strange contest indeed) I just tried looking for those articles but to no avail. There are also obvious forgeries like a photo of a man digging next to a giant skull but the overlay of the skeleton covered up the spade of the shovel. It’s almost like these obvious forgeries are put out there so people see the fakery and doubt every photo that seems to portray a giant human skeleton. Anything to confuse and keep people from digging any deeper. The same thing with these Antarctica photos and stolen history photos. Fakes are inserted to keep people from trusting the authenticity of anything contrary to the narrative.

I'm having trouble trusting a single solitary "old" map. The problem is, all or most typically display a real lack of accuracy, skills, or knowledge. If we believe the world once had techniques so advanced that we built the great structures and infrastructures such as illustrated in World's Fairs, then the idea that maps wouldn't be remarkably precise, especially for places where these fairs took place, is absurd. Either we are to believe the same peers were beyond brilliant with engineering and architecture but terrible with cartography, or we should believe that all current circulating maps have been produced specifically to deceive the bearer into believing ideas of progression: ideas that realities such as World's Fairs aptly dispel.

Exactly, well said. Anything to get us away from the idea that the world was once more advanced and the technology lost. I too have a hard time trusting any of the old maps. Though they may depict truth there are also things to make it feel like it is inaccurate. That’s exactly the way the devil works, tell the truth about some things but pepper in lies to lead people astray.

 

[josenoway]

The name Benjamin Fulford should be enough to raise some serious questions on authenticity...

Benjamin Fulford is a long time, notorious disinfo agent, known for spreading propaganda for wishful thinkers, with predictions that never come true...

 

[mifletzet]

Antarctica to be mapped by drone. Will they find anything? Would they tell us if they did?


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHJm3x483rU



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHQigsjjgS0

 

[mifletzet]

Is there anything genuine or anomalous in this footage?


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5WNUL639lI&t=405s

 

[markp2112]

It always occurs to me that it's very unlikely that you can map the whole world including the shoreline of Antarctica but completely miss Australia.

 

[Just]

Is there anything genuine or anomalous in this footage?


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5WNUL639lI&t=405s

‘It’s obvious that these cities were built 12,000 years ago’ - why? There may be truth in this footage (the structures look genuine) but the hole in the middle of ‘Antartica’ is a piece of footage to persuade us that the land mass called Antarctica exists and supports the globe earth model. If the scientists were traumatised I’d say it’s because they had realised that everything they’d believed about the earth is wrong. And if you look at the Stergios’ moon map you can see we are close to discovering the new lands that have been frozen over for - yes, possibly - 12000 years and indicate that other parts of our known world are close to being frozen over again in the endless cycle of freezing and thawing that our world has faced. I don’t believe the armadillo-like aliens or any aliens at all were seen. What was seen, in my opinion, was the truth of the lie and we will all have to face that in the not too distant future unless they manage to get rid of us first.