I suddenly get the impression that, from an 'intelligent' perspective, the moon landing perhaps shouldn't be criticized *
too* heavily, because it might well be that it was, in one way or another, actually a good idea. Why?
To unite people, perhaps? An attempt to create unity among humanity? After all, that is what I gather from the words I hear when I listen to the first press conference again in that light. The report and the answers could be seen as a theatrical performance staged to educate us in greater cooperation with one another.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTJOxdeNdVo
And also: "That is a small step for a man, a giant leap for mankind," can be interpreted as an
ethical call for us as humanity to behave better. That would be a
giant leap for the well-being of mankind.
For we certainly shouldn't view these kinds of matters
solely from a technical perspective, but also from an ethical/moral one, that which
perhaps includes the higher ranks, who are indeed good people.
For from an ethical/moral perspective, we can state, I think,
A. negatively: We are being scammed, something is wrong, they are criminals; but
B., viewed from a positive perspective, we could state: They are (indeed) heroes, peacemakers, good people. (The astronauts and those who worked on it behind the scenes, that is.)
And that could (therefore) be the case with this Atemis II as well (in a negative cense?). So there could (therefore) be a lot of acting involved, and
perhaps not (only?) positive (but also negative cvd?. and Artm?.).
(And yes, I do see some technical peculiarities, just so you know, but that is not my point right now.. And one more little thing; while writing this, I got the Idea that everyone sees it from their own perspective. A carpenter sees carpentry mistakes, a thief sees certain 'peculiarities,' and a depressed person sees nothing but misery, and so on. After all, a hammer is always looking for nails, isn't it? (So someone's opinion might say something about that person themselves, just like it does about me . . . ))
