SH Archive Black Kings Erased Out of History
- Thread starter Archive
- Start date
Archive
Old SH Archive
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2020
- Messages
- 17,737
- Reaction score
- 3,167
"Yes, this is where the term the Dark Ages comes from."
Serious statement re the origination and meaning of the term "Dark Ages"?
Archive
Old SH Archive
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2020
- Messages
- 17,737
- Reaction score
- 3,167
Yes, look up the Moorish invasion of Europe.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2020
- Messages
- 4,691
- Reaction score
- 1,500
Interesting opinion. Personally think that “Dark Ages” pertains to the post catastrophic era. That I will write about later. Yet, an interesting take it is.
W
WorldWar1812
Guest
skylitzes manuscript
- Emperor Alexander on his deathbed hands over power to his nephew Constantine
- Constantine VII (Roman emperor), deathbed
I dunno, I dunno......
Archive
Old SH Archive
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2020
- Messages
- 17,737
- Reaction score
- 3,167
The Windsor name change had a lot to do with the fact that Gotha bombers were doing bomb raids on British soil thus the crown thought that it would be in their best interest to sound as British as possible. They didnt let go of their German roots however as is evident by the royal family taking the famous photo in which they do the Heil Hitler Nazi salute as well as the Queen marrying a known Nazi party member.
W
WorldWar1812
Guest
As per old records, both, Nile and Niger river were modified including thousands of channels. So not exactly natural rivers but modified by these ancient black nobility.
We should note barbars and berbers in its own phonetical correlation.
Berbers - Wikipedia
"Noble Men", another side of this word it's took from hebrew (bar -son-) as biblical story of Barabbas (very distorted, Jesus and Barabbas are the same character, so people who wanted barabbas free, claimed mercy for Jesus).
(Bar-Abbas, son of "the father", son of god).
So Barbars, are bar-bar -sons.....of THE SON (of God)-
Anyway as I told this is not about racial debate.
We see here spanish moorish, with very pale face and red hair in Granada (Alhambra, the red fortress, Al-Hammra).
So we can say Europe (Rome, Catholicism) against old world (Carthago, Africa), took place some centuries ago. We should include here weather changes (1200s), affecting Sahara, progressive desertization, and the falling of Africa (Carthago) and by the same forces of history, the falling of the black nobility (Moorish).
Zahara or Desert of Barbary | Sahara Overland
We should point either with respect this older order of rulers the nasrid dinasty.
Nasrid dynasty - Wikipedia
Nazari - Wikipedia
which means, of course a kind of sacred rulers (kings like popes), and by the way the true origin of the Nazarene.
Nazarene (title) - Wikipedia
It's almost a joke how nasi has been degraded (Nazis, Nassis), purposelly done, as WWII was a theatre predesigned for the defeat of Nazi Germans and the world wide centralisation of finances in Switzerland.
Nasi (Hebrew title) - Wikipedia
We have even nowadays some very bizarre toponimic sources, of Arab people (Ara-be), or moorisks. (do not fully correlate arab and muslim as it's not the same)
Besarabia (Bass-Arabia)
Bessarabia - Wikipedia
Araba
Álava - Wikipedia
Pre-muslims were in fact christians (aryans)
Arianism - Wikipedia
This black kings connection it's world wide, even in China
5 Ancient Black Civilizations That Were Not in Africa
7 Medieval African Kingdoms Everyone Should Know About
Finally to close the circle.
Sax-Sah-Sahara (Sakh-Ara). Despite very probable astronomical questions
Pyramids. In the middle of the Fire
the Sax-Sah (or royal dagger), has it's own proved link both phonetically and etimologically
in spanish (to lance, to cut)
"sajar" in English | Spanish-English Dictionary
It's clear official history has lots of manipulated records.
I got you
Sakh-Mat
Were the Washitaw the first Americans and the ancient mount builders? The Washitaw claim that they are originally from the land of Mu and were already in the Americas when the "native" Americans showed up. They say they are descendant from Olmec peoples. There's a short video (that I don't think added much to the discussion) after the article but some of the comments were insightful and gave links for further research into the topic.
Archive
Old SH Archive
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2020
- Messages
- 17,737
- Reaction score
- 3,167
The house of Saxen Coburg Gotha is a royal house, but how German is it? I think it claims heritage from Gorm the old in Denmark and thereby divine heritage like the Japanese emperor. The house is surely related to the Swedish Wasa kings. Also to Russian Vladimir? So I think. The ancient Swedish royal house of the ynglings is supposedly extinct. Does it live on somehow?
The black nobility is a new concept for me. Similarly, the black pope. I am not aware of black heritage in the royal families, but there has been talk of Jewish influence since Jakob, James, the brother of Jesus, came to southern France with three ladies called Marie. There is a village named after the ladies in Camargue in southern France. I have been there.
Mountbatten was magically changed from Battenberg. A way to turn things around.
The 1492 date for the discovery of America now officially makes sense to me:
As per old records, both, Nile and Niger river were modified including thousands of channels. So not exactly natural rivers but modified by these ancient black nobility.
We should note barbars and berbers in its own phonetical correlation.
Berbers - Wikipedia
"Noble Men", another side of this word it's took from hebrew (bar -son-) as biblical story of Barabbas (very distorted, Jesus and Barabbas are the same character, so people who wanted barabbas free, claimed mercy for Jesus).
(Bar-Abbas, son of "the father", son of god).
So Barbars, are bar-bar -sons.....of THE SON (of God)-
Anyway as I told this is not about racial debate.
We see here spanish moorish, with very pale face and red hair in Granada (Alhambra, the red fortress, Al-Hammra).
So we can say Europe (Rome, Catholicism) against old world (Carthago, Africa), took place some centuries ago. We should include here weather changes (1200s), affecting Sahara, progressive desertization, and the falling of Africa (Carthago) and by the same forces of history, the falling of the black nobility (Moorish).
Zahara or Desert of Barbary | Sahara Overland
We should point either with respect this older order of rulers the nasrid dinasty.
Nasrid dynasty - Wikipedia
Nazari - Wikipedia
which means, of course a kind of sacred rulers (kings like popes), and by the way the true origin of the Nazarene.
Nazarene (title) - Wikipedia
It's almost a joke how nasi has been degraded (Nazis, Nassis), purposelly done, as WWII was a theatre predesigned for the defeat of Nazi Germans and the world wide centralisation of finances in Switzerland.
Nasi (Hebrew title) - Wikipedia
We have even nowadays some very bizarre toponimic sources, of Arab people (Ara-be), or moorisks. (do not fully correlate arab and muslim as it's not the same)
Besarabia (Bass-Arabia)
Bessarabia - Wikipedia
Araba
Álava - Wikipedia
Pre-muslims were in fact christians (aryans)
Arianism - Wikipedia
This black kings connection it's world wide, even in China
5 Ancient Black Civilizations That Were Not in Africa
7 Medieval African Kingdoms Everyone Should Know About
Finally to close the circle.
Sax-Sah-Sahara (Sakh-Ara). Despite very probable astronomical questions
Pyramids. In the middle of the Fire
the Sax-Sah (or royal dagger), has it's own proved link both phonetically and etimologically
in spanish (to lance, to cut)
"sajar" in English | Spanish-English Dictionary
It's clear official history has lots of manipulated records.
I got you
Sakh-Mat
The Nasrid Dynasty - was the last Moorish Muslim dynasty in the Iberian Peninsula, ruling the Emirate of Granada from 1230 until 1492.[1] The Nasrid dynasty rose to power after the defeat of the Almohad Caliphate in 1212 at the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa. Twenty-three emirs ruled Granada from the founding of the dynasty in 1230 by Muhammad I until 2 January 1492, when Muhammad XII surrendered all lands to King Ferdinand II of Aragon and Queen Isabella I of Castille.
All they did was take over the already established shipping routes. It's pretty clear that any seafaring nation focused on the Western Coast of Africa and Spain would be well aware of these currents as soon as they have ocean capable boats. All they really needed was some big ass rafts and enough food and they'd get to the Caribbean.
As for the whole racial discussion, who gives a f**k. We're all stuck here together might as well figure it out as a team. Go look at some 14th/15th century maps and tell me there wasn't any black monarchs.
We've lost a few members who posted some quality content who seem to have gone down the Aryan rabbit hole. These topics are highly polarizing and I sense there's members on here who aren't quite as objective as they claim.
Whatever your view of history if you can't acknowledge that the Tartarians were a blending of Scythian and Hellenic culture then you're missing the bigger picture. If you haven't realized by now that a sub-section of that culture was completely mixed races then you haven't been paying attention.
If you don't agree... Please explain to me how there were wealthy black slave owners in the Americas?
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2020
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 5
WW1812 - great job of researching. This is a very interesting conundrum. Firstly, this doesn't surprise me about ancient black nobility at all. Egypt used to be called Khem, which means 'black', for cryin' out loud! That speaks volumes in and of itself. To me anyway. Secondly, it makes me think of Sitchin again ( i know, sorry all you Sitchin haters,
One of my thoughts is that the white slave trade was actually very popular, especially in the Ottoman empire and has been covered up heavily. Is it not possible that the black nobility interbred with white slaves to produce lighter skin color so they could hide and take over Europe and such? I'm seeing this phenomenon with all peoples using other skin colors to hide and hijack countries. Its a fairly easy thing to do that most people don't seem to think of. This allows you to control a group of people and gain their trust them make them do horrible things and then in the future make it look like it was their fault as such in what's going on today with the whole white genocide agenda. The same can be said for whites doing this to others and such. The masonic chessboard is Black and White which is basically pitting the two against each other, think about who gains from this though? Obviously not either. Heres a video you might find interesting.We know all kings come from a single root. Windsor royal house changed in WWI (1917) the official name (Sax-Coburg-Gottha) to the more "inglisch" Windsor. As if they knew German-Prussian branch was about to disappear (as it happened), and being pointed as a damn'warrior and cruel dynasty (as they really were).
WWI finished Austrian Habsburgs, German Prussian dynasties and through communists (financed from Switzerland), Russian Romanovs (Romanovs weren't the real and ancient Russian true dynasty -rurik-, so communists did the job to vanish those liars).
House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
Sakha (branch)
Knife or Stone, but Noblish Men.
Sax, Sachs (Goldman-Sachs?), Sah egyptian god, it's related. Etimologies have several explanations for Shah.
Shah (King of Persia)
Sah (Orion- The Hunter or the Warrior), from saxons can be translated as knife or stone (italian root Sasso it's a big rock or mountain), maybe even be linked to Sassanids, but mostly the Knife (Sax), not only as war attribute but royalty.
Through official history, and the Holy German-Roman Empire (probably the real ROME Empire), Saxs located in south danemark (Jutes=Jews?) were the most terrible enemy they had and the hardest to conquer.
Sea control, pillage of vikings and normands saxons (this skill to steal the wealth of nations, can be linked to templars finantial control).
There are lots of aristochrats whose their wealthy comes from stealing and pillage (like Grimaldi's House - Monaco).
The Sax or Knife, it's very prominent in ancient georgian and armenian kings tombs. Russian word кинжал (kinshal) or dagger, relates king to Kin-shal (knife/dagger). There are some rumours about the ancient lineage descendants of giants and young human queens that needed assistance on giving birth with a knife (caesarian section).
Khanjali
Sax, Schach, or russian word for chess (used since very old times to show aristochracy how to face a battlefield) is the same (Шах-Shakh). In fact chess game it's Шахмати shakh-mati (Check-Mate/Shakh-Mat), Mat as primordial big mother or as a bee queen (originally the piece that determined to win the game was the queen), as if winning a chess game showed metaphorically reaching the pregnant queen and slashing (with a knife -sax) the womb to get a new king. Shakh-Mat (Check-Mate).
Shakh (Sah), again relates to arabian word Sheik.
So Aristochracy comes from dinasties and royal families that can be traced almost to a single root.
What does it mean Aristochracy?. There are several interpretations. What it comes first to the surface it's ARIS/ARES, greek demigod for war (Mars/Ares).
That probably can be explained, as landlords, and middle ages who owned castles and their lands were gained mostly through war.
It's important to note that King (Rex in latin), references to a piece of land, but not superior attributions being a king it's not exactly being in the capstone of the pyramid's power.
King=Rex (Reg), Reggio or Region etimologically relates to Rex (King). So a King has the administration of the territories, but not sacred meaning. Upper (in that hypothetical capstone of the pyramid), places the Emperor. So an Emperor or Empress it's in a higher place of power as it has not only military powers, but superior rights on legislation (money control, taxes), and mostly over all religions or sacred power (and of course the emperor represents the only legitimate "blue blood" warranty to survive through ages).
A King, and his descendants, his royal branch can be lost, but the main royal lineage of the emperor cannot as it's the head of all those royal branches.
This is why is used the royal bees as a metaphorical picture where there's one single bee queen, the rest can be lost one way or another.
There has been through different ages, a single blood (babylonian brotherhood), that could have changed in appearance, but the head of them remains always in the highest top level of power, since the pharaohs era (remember the maps showing babylon in egypt in site of mesopothamia).
So we have this royalty branch (now Windors), as the older branch, linked to Saxe-Coburg-Gottha.
House of Windsor - Wikipedia
UK flag (1801), represents a lot, combines Saint Andrew and Saint George flags, three typical masonic colours (most powerfull nations blue, white, red -UK, USA, France, Russia). White represents pureness (sacred command), Red represents legislation control (finantial), Blue represents military power (like NATO flag). Octogon templar symbolism it's clear on the Union Jack flag. As UK-London it's the core of actual royalty (the bee-hive for the
bee-queen).
What it's interesting here it's what happened in old times with black people's nobility, as it seems has been erased out of the official history.
Nobility, Nobel comes from "celestial heaven" (so people related to the stars), Небо (Nebo) in Russian (Heaven). Nibelungs sagas from Germany can be explained through this etymology.
And I point specifically on this because the "bizarre" fact that the coat of arms of German city Coburg shows a sort of black prince or black people royalty branch (by the way phonetically Coburg=CB=KB=Kaaba).
Diving into old metaphysical Egyptian (coptic, again CP=KB) concepts, the KA it's the life force or spirit (inner energy which keeps us alive, this is easy to draw or imagine within a kyrlian photography showing the blue aura all living things has), and the BA it's the soul, or what survives this physical matrix beyond the death. So here we could go through "beyond death notions", entities (angels or demons) and the ancient knowledge to communicate with
them (remember, and there should be a reason for that, all traditional religious systems, and of course abrahamic religions forbid any attempt to do this).
In the modern world, this knowledge falls into high aristocracy class. Nowadays modern astronomy has devoided totally the real concept of what is called firmament, depicting a "dead" or material universe out of any other metaphysical conception. Let me remind you that "metaphysical" it's not a futile word or an invention but a real side (hidden) on this physical world.
Astrology actually has been ridiculed, but in ancient times, those people knew perfectly well how important astrology was. The real knowledge (very complex) is the astrology not the modern astronomy full of tales for children.
So, trying not to lead so far this to "conspiracy", who knows, WHO rules this world (I mean metaphysical entities) that at first sight sounds ridiculous, but in fact it isn't. Then again we probably ignore how real power works in the top of the bee-hive or "capstone in the pyramid" of these "aristoi" or "blueish blood people".
As we have been forced (very explicit today) being totally void of the spiritual side of life (and that has very dramatic consequences on real knowledge), to dismiss or lose the link to the metaphysical side, we are very close to zombies or what nazis (nassis) called "üntermenschen" (infra-humans), totally undefended against the knowledge high aristocracy class keeps since very old times.
Nazi, Nasa, Nasi.
I'm interested in black people's royalty, and why they have been erased out of official history as if it never happened, as my own intuition tells me this fact it's related on this sort of ancient knowledge cover up.
What happened to black people's nobility?
There are lots of pictures, artistic manifestations, showing us black kings, black princess, in recent times such as renaissance (we could draw a separating line since 18th century), as if it never happened, but there was a black royalty.
Official history tell us black people was always almost not too much evolutioned in a civilization's ranking, setting them more or less in a neolithic (several millennia) stage of civilization development. That's totally false.
Shakespeare's "Venetian Moor", depicts a black person character. Nowadays the character has been archaetypically moved to the greedish jew, as shown in the movies.
But "Il Moro di Venezia" was a black person, a black merchant, a Moorish. Even in Greek Mavros remains as "black". And the country of Mauritania (as all the western Africa coasts) were governed by black people kings not the actual moor appearance (Muslims) we see nowadays.
So "Moorish" has two meanings:
-related to navigation skills (mariners)
-dark skin people (maroon, brownish, or even black people)
This brings to me the fact that the ancient Phoenicians, maybe they were not simply "dark skin" but even black people. I don't want to focus this (as much people does) in a racial debate. Ancient world had white, black or yellow kings. I'm interested to know why black people fell in a sort of unfortunate disgrace world wide.
Some historicians argues that those black people coat of arms (so many in Germany for instance), can be explained simply as a little faction of nobility gained through war as black people were used in military forces. But as we know aristocracy is a very closed circle. I can understand they were used in war and rewarded in some way by that but not widely set in high nobility positions.
Here comes the controversial subject of the "broken noses".
There are lots of sculptures, statues on ancient egypt with broken noses (so many), it seems that more than accidental falling, or any other reason, it has been promoted (and maybe that began not exclusively with white people in 18th-19th century but a bit before with ottoman Turkish Muslim people) to broke the nose of ancient egyptian royalty which in facts seems a very clear willing to hide black people's physionomy.
Great Sphinx MISSING NOSE Mystery - by Gorilla199
Then again I ask. WHY?
I'm not thinking on racial debate, I pick up higher motivations. Racial debate as some other vectors are used to manipulate people's minds (divide and conquer).
The reason to hide black nobility has to be much deeper hidden in legitimation's questions on royalty.
So erasing the black royalty out of the club.
Maybe black people's nobility knew so much?. They did wrong things? Or wrong metaphysical entities?
White Slaves - Black Slaves
I've been studying facial features of people for quite some time since I figured out that this might be going on with a certain group of people and how they happen to control almost everything in the world.
There are people with the caucasian skin color that have very weird facial features for that type.
Anyway, I found an interesting quote from a rapper I used to listen to. Nas(Nasi?) "We are the slave and the master" Wouldn't that be interesting if black people were actually enslaving black people but using white skin to do it and then now blaming it on the white skin as they transition back to black skin?
Whatever the case, the people in charge don't care about their supposed race. They are all internationalists. The only thing I ever hear of that might be racially based is something such as the Golden Horde, from Genghis Khan and maybe the Chinese as they are practicing eugenics plans now supposedly.
History seems to be empires changing their names over and over again as well as bloodlines to hide who is actually ruling them. Think about the whole Black Nobility from Venetians and the Black Pope, etc. Maybe it's more literal than they want us to believe.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2020
- Messages
- 4,691
- Reaction score
- 1,500
This type of communication will get a user banned every time on this forum. When one has an opinion, let that opinion be explained. There is no customer service on SH to handle insults. Reddit and ATS have those.
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2020
- Messages
- 75
- Reaction score
- 25
I think the big cover up of cover ups in modern history is the enslavement and demoralization of Native Americans or as we like to call them African Americans... A lot of the evidence suggest west Africans have been coming to America for hundreds if not thousands of years... there are specific ocean currents that go from west Africa to Brazil to Cuba then to Spain then back to west Africa all guided by the southern cross... The depictions of the natives along with the obvious over whelmning number of dark skinned ppl in north and South America leads me to believe that they are the conquered people who were enslaved... Archeologists who uncovered skeleton remains in north and South America which they date over 12000 old if not older are all negroid as opposed to mongaloid which are the type of native Americans we picture... Old Dirty Bastard comes from a community in the nyc that has long Indian heritage... I just find it hard to believe they transported so many Africans from Africa when there is documentation of the first people Columbus and the Spanish explorers encountered were copper colored and black and said to be great sprinters.... They probably sent Moorish and North African ppl to America as slaves too after the Spanish Inquisition which started in 1492... That was a culmination of hundreds of years of war dating back to the richest man in the world Mansa Musa
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
- Messages
- 218
- Reaction score
- 233
Is it possible, that carthago was a "roman" city. And moorish invasion of said city paved the way for the moorish invasion of spain iberia?
Similar threads
- WorldWar1812
- General
