SH Archive Bright Insight: thousands of years of history

SH.org OP Username
KorbenDallas
SH.org OP Date
2018-12-23 02:01:21
SH.org Reaction Score
2
SH.org Reply Count
2

KD Archive

Not actually KorbenDallas
Active Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2020
Messages
4,691
Reaction score
1,500
Was listening to the most recent Jimmy's video. The contents are pretty interesting, and you can find that video just below. The description for the video is as follows:
  • NASA recently discovered of a massive, 19-mile (31km) wide crater, found hidden underneath Greenland’s Hiawatha Glacier. This crater is the result of an asteroid impact, from a nearly 1 mile-wide mountain of iron, weighing somewhere around, get this, 11-12 BILLION tons, and was traveling at approximately 12 MILES per second - which is equivalent to more than 43,000 miles per hour - when it slammed into the earth some 12,000 years ago – And… with the mind-boggling force of essentially a 700-megaton bomb. And without a doubt, THIS is the reason why there is so much mystery and why we know so little about lost Ancient human civilization.

KD: I'm using this video as an example, for just about every 45 seconds we can hear 12,000 years ago (9,000 years ago and so on). These thousands of years of history. What is the basis for us operating with such numbers? I am not saying that our Earth does not have 50,000 years under its belt, or a mil/bil for that matter.

What material sources, or proof do we have to insist that something specific took place that long ago?
So, what gives us this opportunities to say that some asteroid hit Earth 12,000 years ago? Where do we get this information about what happened thousands of years ago?
Note: This OP was recovered from the Wayback Archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: UnusualBean
Date: 2018-12-23 11:49:26
Reaction Score: 7
I've actually been thinking about this recently, and I suspect you might be on the same wavelength, KD.

As per the video, money and tribalistic thinking are definitely a factor in the issue, but it's been shown that TPTB can and will shape a new narrative at the drop of a dime if they want to. So why have they really been shunning the idea of a series of major global cataclysms 12,000 years ago?

Could it be because it wasn't 12,000 years ago?

Could it be because it was actually hundreds of years ago?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: BStankman
Date: 2018-12-24 11:02:39
Reaction Score: 5
Fake geology and controlled opposition mostly.
Hancock, based on Hapgood. Bauval and West.
Schoch who somehow was able to keep his job at Yale.

If you dont push the sunken cities back to 10,000 BC, you dont have the source of water.

1545649029151.png


North America ice age in 1650.

Amerique Septentrionale... 1650

1545649229567.png
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top