Just been watch Janet Ossebaard's Fall of the Cabal - The Sequel Part 4 in which she covers the Protocols. She's obviously coming from a Trump/Q saviour position, so that victory will be a "real" one, but it's a well put together video.
Coronavirus: Possible Reset
- Thread starter AgentOrange5
- Start date
Just been watch Janet Ossebaard's Fall of the Cabal - The Sequel Part 4 in which she covers the Protocols. She's obviously coming from a Trump/Q saviour position, so that victory will be a "real" one, but it's a well put together video.
The exact same operating instructions for CV1984 are here applied to scary icebergs in a land called far far away.
The size of an iceberg depends on where you live...
From Bedford Today: An iceberg which has been dubbed 'the size of Bedfordshire' has broken off from Antarctica, near to a British Antarctic Survey (BAS) station. The 1,270km2, 150 metre-thick chunk of frozen water separated from the Brunt Ice Shelf this morning.
Their fifteen seconds of fame didn't last long.
From The Metro: A huge iceberg nearly as large as Greater London has broken off the Antarctic ice shelf near a British research station.
From Paris Match: Un iceberg géant de la taille de Paris se détache de l'Antarctique
From rtlnieuws.nl: IJsberg ter grootte van provincie Utrecht breekt af van Antarctica
From rte.ie: Iceberg the size of Co Monaghan calves in Antarctica
From Bild.de: In der Antarktis ist ein riesiger Eisberg vom Schelfeis abgebrochen. Das teilte die Organisation British Antarctic Survey (BAS) am Freitag mit. Der Eisberg mit einer Fläche von 1270 Quadratkilometern (etwa halb so groß wie das Saarland) war Teil des Brunt-Schelfeises, einem Gletscher in der Antarktis.
The size of an iceberg depends on where you live...
From Bedford Today: An iceberg which has been dubbed 'the size of Bedfordshire' has broken off from Antarctica, near to a British Antarctic Survey (BAS) station. The 1,270km2, 150 metre-thick chunk of frozen water separated from the Brunt Ice Shelf this morning.
Their fifteen seconds of fame didn't last long.
From The Metro: A huge iceberg nearly as large as Greater London has broken off the Antarctic ice shelf near a British research station.
From Paris Match: Un iceberg géant de la taille de Paris se détache de l'Antarctique
From rtlnieuws.nl: IJsberg ter grootte van provincie Utrecht breekt af van Antarctica
From rte.ie: Iceberg the size of Co Monaghan calves in Antarctica
From Bild.de: In der Antarktis ist ein riesiger Eisberg vom Schelfeis abgebrochen. Das teilte die Organisation British Antarctic Survey (BAS) am Freitag mit. Der Eisberg mit einer Fläche von 1270 Quadratkilometern (etwa halb so groß wie das Saarland) war Teil des Brunt-Schelfeises, einem Gletscher in der Antarktis.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2020
- Messages
- 132
- Reaction score
- 396
20 times the size of Manhattan over here in the states!!!
Iceberg More Than 20 Times the Size of Manhattan Breaks Off Antarctic Ice Shelf
Peter Hitchens, stridently and vocally against lockdowns and masks, has taken the vaccine (so he says). Unsurprisingly, the news hasn't been well received. Can you say controlled opposition? You can, but Hitchens insists on consistency through omission.
Sounds like Chancellor Rishi Sunak (who'd believe this was the UK?) is going to extend the furlough scheme till October, I wonder if this will eventually turn into UBI on condition of a "vaccination passport" after all the small businesses and the high street have been destroyed?
Last edited:
6079SmithW
Deleted
The United Kingdom Authority State Government whatever it is called relies on consent.
YOU have to put YOUR SELF on their hook. CON SENT.
Not a hard concept to get your head around and if you look at the words in the documents they put online in regards to COCO1984 it is easy to see.
They OFFER a test, they OFFER a vaccine just like they OFFER a schooling.
They ASK for your details.
But people don't pay this any attention. I didn't for decades just took it all for granted and went along with it without paying it any attention. Seems I was not alone. Its easy to fool most of the people all of the time as his thread is evidence of as indeed this site is evidence of.
Edit to correct a typo.
YOU have to put YOUR SELF on their hook. CON SENT.
Not a hard concept to get your head around and if you look at the words in the documents they put online in regards to COCO1984 it is easy to see.
They OFFER a test, they OFFER a vaccine just like they OFFER a schooling.
They ASK for your details.
But people don't pay this any attention. I didn't for decades just took it all for granted and went along with it without paying it any attention. Seems I was not alone. Its easy to fool most of the people all of the time as his thread is evidence of as indeed this site is evidence of.
Edit to correct a typo.
Last edited by a moderator:
They don't need to legally force compliance, enough organisations and individuals willingly go along with their agendas that it makes it almost impossible for anyone who tries to resist to live normally. It's like how it's not a legal requirement to have a bank account, yet in practice it would be impossible to live without one, especially so now many retailers are imposing "no cash" policies without even being legally obliged to.
I have no bank account and I'm still here. Got rid of it about nine or ten years ago.
Your ideas of what can be done are very limiting if you don't mind me saying.
Edit to add.
They cannot force. They never do they just make it appear to be the case by their use of words and wordsmiths. Take the electoral roll OFFER. The wordage there is clear that the only thing that generates a possible £1000 fine is filling in the form incorrectly. Not filling the form in, ignoring it, burning it composting it incurs no fine.
To go to a foreign land a vaccination may be a requirement of travel. You can con sent to be vaccinated to travel you cannot be forced. They will of course say you cannot go without a vaccination but that still leaves you in the position of having to con sent to being stabbed and gaining a piece of paper to 'prove' it. Naturally we invent all manner of reason why we 'have to consent' because its how we are trained to think.
Your ideas of what can be done are very limiting if you don't mind me saying.
Edit to add.
They cannot force. They never do they just make it appear to be the case by their use of words and wordsmiths. Take the electoral roll OFFER. The wordage there is clear that the only thing that generates a possible £1000 fine is filling in the form incorrectly. Not filling the form in, ignoring it, burning it composting it incurs no fine.
To go to a foreign land a vaccination may be a requirement of travel. You can con sent to be vaccinated to travel you cannot be forced. They will of course say you cannot go without a vaccination but that still leaves you in the position of having to con sent to being stabbed and gaining a piece of paper to 'prove' it. Naturally we invent all manner of reason why we 'have to consent' because its how we are trained to think.
Last edited by a moderator:
I have literally just phoned up the census hotline, after receiving a letter saying that 'it is required by law' to fill out the census, or you will receive a £1,000 fine.
I informed the (very pleasant and tolerant) lady that I don't have government so don't want to fill it in but don't want to be fined. She said, thanks, all we need is your post code and we won't issue a fine to you if you don't want us to.
Interesting, although I find it surprising you would be able to pay for your internet connection, utilities, etc, without a bank account and get paid by an employer. If you were totally off grid and self-sufficient I could understand it, but as you obviously have internet access I'm guessing that's not the case?
So they're issuing threats they can't legally enforce, or are they just waving the law if you ask nicely?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
- Messages
- 211
- Reaction score
- 643
I don't know how KD manages without a bank account, would be interested in hearing more (credit union?), but moving forward crypto will be an easy way to achieve this. You can get payment cards which can be used to purchase with crypto now, so technically crypto is now accepted everywhere you see the visa sign. The government won't know what you've got, especially if you convert to Monero, so you can act as your own bank. Of course, this would only be temporary, eventually they will find a way to control crypto, probably by resticting your access to the internet itself, but until then it should work well - just remember to convert to real world assetts before they take the interet away!
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2020
- Messages
- 109
- Reaction score
- 143
I got a call a couple days after the pandemic started by the Canadian statistics office saying I had been selected for a survey. Told him to f*** off and was politely informed I would be fined thousands of dollars for not partaking in a 6 month survey. Once a month I got a call and became a good citizen for a half an hour. Lol
Prepaid credit cards are an option.
Edit: yeah, the employer would have to pay cash and the cell phone companies do a credit check. Always lots of hurdles.
They are all cowards. Not one of them stood up for us =(
I guess so. Maybe both. I questioned them on what law it was, and they didn't know. They spoke to the manager that said it was the Census act of 1920.
I THINK actually they are quoting a legal framework as a law. And then waiving the legal framework when pointed out that this is unlawful and requires statutory consent of the individual.
Alternatively, I just spoke to a nice lady who pulled a few strings and realised that having this conversation with me would be more than £1000 worth of pain.
I THINK actually they are quoting a legal framework as a law. And then waiving the legal framework when pointed out that this is unlawful and requires statutory consent of the individual.
Alternatively, I just spoke to a nice lady who pulled a few strings and realised that having this conversation with me would be more than £1000 worth of pain.
In Bearclaws example.
I'll lay odds most people are blissfully unaware of the Universal Postal Union and its Rules. I was until 2015 or thereabouts. Anyway no postal service in existence that is Registered by the UPU delivers anything to a name. They all deliver to an address.
The contents of the envelope are NOT supposed to be visible from the outside so no openings or windows allowed. Royal Mail has the Universal Service Obligation in the jurisdiction of the UK but if they 'played' by the no window rule they would go out of business overnight.
The census letter will likely not have borne a name in the window. (They didn't in 2011.) It will have been householder or something very similar ergo it was sent and delivered to an address. Addresses cannot do anything. It was enough to persuade bearclaw to consent to be the householder and millions of others will be similarly persuaded by the power of the programming and the words used into consenting to be something they cannot be.
The "A response is required by Law" warning is more than enough to get the envelope opened.
Who or what is required by Law?
There is no name on the letter and the householder is but a word so who does that leave?
Answer is someone who consents to act as householder or feels that they must respond because the words demand it.
Get off the electoral roll and the Electoral Roll Officer will send a postcard to the address without any name or title written upon it with a similar warning that a response is required by law or under so and so Act, cannot remember. How does the address respond?
I don't know but guess you are all after being 'left alone' by the government but being enabled to carry on the way of living you do today well sorry chaps, not possible. You are looking at the symptoms not the cause, just as the NHS Blessed be its name 1.2-1.4 million workforce does. You do not need an outside guru to show you the way, you do not need outside authority to tell you what to do. It took me five or six years to accept that.Taken me far longer to accept that in this shitshow labelled civilised society it is literally pay up or die that is the offer the Authority cult makes. Were asteroids real I would be guiding the biggest bugger in to end the show never mind the poxy COCO1984 Asteroid Atlantis would be a spectacular 'last memory'.
You were not born with a bank account, in actual fact it isn't yours. All accounts belong to the account originator the bank. I know as one bank closed an account on me a couple of months after I asked about a mysterious deduction of £200 with a sort code of 000000 or 00-00-00. They didn't like me asking questions. I said the only thing that made sense was I had put £1200 on the giro slip but had only handed over£1000 in banknotes correction a cheque for £1000 which of course supports the idea that banks get paid twice through the bank giro system and they 'cash' the credit first not the notes so to make the books balance they had to correct their mistake. The balancing of books is literally everything in the banking world.
You do not gain a bank account at birth, no address either.
Just as you were not born wearing a mask or as the government wordsmiths put it "face covering" to guard against the big bad Spanish Flu or The Black Death or the contemporary COCO1984.
You are given a mask just after birth though you are blissfully unaware of it and it has to be forced on you over time by the schooling in language but it truly is the mask of the actor and is called Legal Name. Beyond the broad confines of this thread though. I've already pushed the boundaries on a few occasions but to bring it back into line a little bit.
When I went through schooling UK style I dutifully went through all the sugar lumping and stabbings to get most of the vaccines being pushed back then until at the age of fourteen or fifteen I said No to my parents and they withdrew their consent from the school. When my own son got to the 'vaccination stage' of his schooling we told the school No from the get go and that was that.
Consent can only be given voluntarily. What I didn't know then but do now is the vaccines are OFFERED. Consent has to be given and recorded in writing as being given. Acting doesn't cut it as evidence of consent despite all the word games they play "Can we have your details just for our records?" being a commonplace ploy stopped dead by the awesome word NO or just as effectively if he request is in writing by ignoring the letter or destroying it.
White knights do not exist you are all you need to work it out. Outside authority is a myth.
Edit to add in a missing 'need'. Edit two to correct a mistake.
I'll lay odds most people are blissfully unaware of the Universal Postal Union and its Rules. I was until 2015 or thereabouts. Anyway no postal service in existence that is Registered by the UPU delivers anything to a name. They all deliver to an address.
The contents of the envelope are NOT supposed to be visible from the outside so no openings or windows allowed. Royal Mail has the Universal Service Obligation in the jurisdiction of the UK but if they 'played' by the no window rule they would go out of business overnight.
The census letter will likely not have borne a name in the window. (They didn't in 2011.) It will have been householder or something very similar ergo it was sent and delivered to an address. Addresses cannot do anything. It was enough to persuade bearclaw to consent to be the householder and millions of others will be similarly persuaded by the power of the programming and the words used into consenting to be something they cannot be.
The "A response is required by Law" warning is more than enough to get the envelope opened.
Who or what is required by Law?
There is no name on the letter and the householder is but a word so who does that leave?
Answer is someone who consents to act as householder or feels that they must respond because the words demand it.
Get off the electoral roll and the Electoral Roll Officer will send a postcard to the address without any name or title written upon it with a similar warning that a response is required by law or under so and so Act, cannot remember. How does the address respond?
I don't know but guess you are all after being 'left alone' by the government but being enabled to carry on the way of living you do today well sorry chaps, not possible. You are looking at the symptoms not the cause, just as the NHS Blessed be its name 1.2-1.4 million workforce does. You do not need an outside guru to show you the way, you do not need outside authority to tell you what to do. It took me five or six years to accept that.Taken me far longer to accept that in this shitshow labelled civilised society it is literally pay up or die that is the offer the Authority cult makes. Were asteroids real I would be guiding the biggest bugger in to end the show never mind the poxy COCO1984 Asteroid Atlantis would be a spectacular 'last memory'.
You were not born with a bank account, in actual fact it isn't yours. All accounts belong to the account originator the bank. I know as one bank closed an account on me a couple of months after I asked about a mysterious deduction of £200 with a sort code of 000000 or 00-00-00. They didn't like me asking questions. I said the only thing that made sense was I had put £1200 on the giro slip but had only handed over
You do not gain a bank account at birth, no address either.
Just as you were not born wearing a mask or as the government wordsmiths put it "face covering" to guard against the big bad Spanish Flu or The Black Death or the contemporary COCO1984.
You are given a mask just after birth though you are blissfully unaware of it and it has to be forced on you over time by the schooling in language but it truly is the mask of the actor and is called Legal Name. Beyond the broad confines of this thread though. I've already pushed the boundaries on a few occasions but to bring it back into line a little bit.
When I went through schooling UK style I dutifully went through all the sugar lumping and stabbings to get most of the vaccines being pushed back then until at the age of fourteen or fifteen I said No to my parents and they withdrew their consent from the school. When my own son got to the 'vaccination stage' of his schooling we told the school No from the get go and that was that.
Consent can only be given voluntarily. What I didn't know then but do now is the vaccines are OFFERED. Consent has to be given and recorded in writing as being given. Acting doesn't cut it as evidence of consent despite all the word games they play "Can we have your details just for our records?" being a commonplace ploy stopped dead by the awesome word NO or just as effectively if he request is in writing by ignoring the letter or destroying it.
White knights do not exist you are all you need to work it out. Outside authority is a myth.
Edit to add in a missing 'need'. Edit two to correct a mistake.
Last edited by a moderator:
I find it irritating how many people who think themselves clued up believe the pandemic is real because Russia is on board and producing vaccines, therefore it must be real because Russia is the "good guy" run by "strong man" Putin who fights the Illuminati while riding bare-chested on a horse, and kicked the Rothschilds-owned Central Bank out of Russia, despite the fact that never actually happened.
Most people can't seem to fathom the idea that both Russia/China and the West are controlled by the same NWO globalists and animosity between the two blocs is a Hegelian dialectic and theatre.
Most people can't seem to fathom the idea that both Russia/China and the West are controlled by the same NWO globalists and animosity between the two blocs is a Hegelian dialectic and theatre.
I notice there's been a lot of articles in the British media about "revellers" attacking police at illegal parties and escaping, and the police generally being out of their depth and unable to stop block parties, house parties, etc and just get attacked and injured.
The agenda here seems twofold, they are trying to associate opposition to the lockdown with violence and criminality, which makes normies angry and inclined to side with the police/the state. Also, they are trying to portray the police as weak and unable to control things, which makes me wonder if the public is being psychologically prepared to accepted if not welcome martial law as the solution.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...vellers-fleeing-drug-fuelled-house-party.html
The agenda here seems twofold, they are trying to associate opposition to the lockdown with violence and criminality, which makes normies angry and inclined to side with the police/the state. Also, they are trying to portray the police as weak and unable to control things, which makes me wonder if the public is being psychologically prepared to accepted if not welcome martial law as the solution.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...vellers-fleeing-drug-fuelled-house-party.html
As far as I'm aware most utilities companies in the UK levy a surcharge to pay in cash, and reserve their best deals for fixed term direct debit customers, so I guess your outgoings must be more than most people because of this? I've noticed that broadband prices, for example, are often double the price if not more for a 1 month no contract price than for a fixed term direct debit price.
If you can spare the extra cash and feel your decision to do this is making a difference then more power to you I guess, but I would say most people would not be in a financial position to put their principles first like that.
I'm also surprised that you have an employer understanding enough to pay your salary or pension in cash as I don't think most would.
I find it surprising that my questions have received such a negative response, it seems like asking questions about the practicality of lofty ideals is frowned upon or something.
