Demonic Possession - The Covid Endgame?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 1432
  • Start date
Interesting video produced by Bret Weinstein interviewing Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology.
Launched June 13, now with 16,700 comments and 1,244,500 views. Weinstein is about to get kicked off Youtube, just got his second strike.

Unfortunately the guy in the blue shirt doesn't know when to shutup, so can be aggravating to watch. Malone is in the white shirt and is softspoken, so not the best match.

Here is the money quote from the video:


"Spike protein is very dangerous, it's cytotoxic."



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY

"Ad hominem attack." LOL oh yes! I have experienced a HUGE number of those on this topic and a variety of others. But it IS true, those responses happen often. I have a theory as to why (regardless of topic). This pic may be uncalled for but I use it for comic value alone.

Kids 2.jpg
 
'Trans' dimensional realm.... that cannot be coincidence... That is what the woke are hoping our realm becomes...
So, if we are the true co-creators - and what we focus on is what we create - is that why kids need to be brainwashed now on the trans agenda, so that they really believe it, focus on it and the 'trans dimensional realm' enters our reality?
 
So, if we are the true co-creators - and what we focus on is what we create - is that why kids need to be brainwashed now on the trans agenda, so that they really believe it, focus on it and the 'trans dimensional realm' enters our reality?

In my understanding of it, the 'brainwashing' adds power to the 'trans' thought-form and creates passive or 'neutral' consent in the brainwashees. This thought-form develops into an 'entity' that can be controlled and can influence people's minds. Subsequently, the more people who join with it and give their active consent to it, the stronger it becomes - i.e. the more it becomes a part of our reality. If you wish to call that co-creation, then I suppose it is, but someone created the initial thought-form without any help or consent from the rest of us.

This principle works in the same way for both positive and negative causes and effects, again purely in my opinion, others may disagree... and no doubt will. 😀
 
In my understanding of it, the 'brainwashing' adds power to the 'trans' thought-form and creates passive or 'neutral' consent in the brainwashees. This thought-form develops into an 'entity' that can be controlled and can influence people's minds. Subsequently, the more people who join with it and give their active consent to it, the stronger it becomes - i.e. the more it becomes a part of our reality. If you wish to call that co-creation, then I suppose it is, but someone created the initial thought-form without any help or consent from the rest of us.

This principle works in the same way for both positive and negative causes and effects, again purely in my opinion, others may disagree... and no doubt will. 😀
I agree. I wanted to make a distinction between the 'awakened' - those of us who know we co-create reality, and the 'woke' - the brainwashed who are giving weight to someone else's desired reality.
 
I agree. I wanted to make a distinction between the 'awakened' - those of us who know we co-create reality, and the 'woke' - the brainwashed who are giving weight to someone else's desired reality.
THAT is an important distinction, between "awakened" and "woke." Many companies are starting to figure out that if they get woke, they go broke recently. I personally cannot stand the whole "woke" movement. Thus my reason for agreeing with your distinguishing between the two words.
 
I often wonder if claiming to be "awakened" or "awake" is an indication of being "woke"? The truly awakened wouldn't need to make any such claim would they? Grammatically they are the same anyway, except for the tense.
 
I often wonder if claiming to be "awakened" or "awake" is an indication of being "woke"? The truly awakened wouldn't need to make any such claim would they? Grammatically they are the same anyway, except for the tense.
Such claims tend to arise from the ego, thus the need to make the claim at all. Of course I am speaking of this from a spiritual POV, and in some cases a religious one (depending). It might in the psychological sense arise from a feeling of inadequacy or lack on the part of the claimant. In my opinion, it is far better to prove what might be a claim of this sort by actions rather than words, because they speak considerably louder overall.

Even in a non-spiritual/religious sense, if one takes the self importance out of the equation they're left with living that way in the daily world as being the best way to prove that they're even self aware at all, much less awakened or woke. It has to start somewhere, so one needs to complete the beginning stages of the thing before claiming anything. If they have not, then that might destroy the entire claim or notion by example. This is why I agree with your assertion/question. IMO they would NOT go around proclaiming their level of awareness as doing so would imply heavy limitations upon it, that being a level of hypocrisy. It makes little difference if one is speaking about some spiritual stature or just the most mundane, earthbound circumstance.

Just my opinions of course!
 
I often wonder if claiming to be "awakened" or "awake" is an indication of being "woke"? The truly awakened wouldn't need to make any such claim would they? Grammatically they are the same anyway, except for the tense.
Have I touched a nerve?
I used to hate talk of being 'awakened' (and the notion of ascended masters and such-like). Yes, just as virtue-signalling and special as 'woke'. I could have said 'aware' and 'unaware' or 'clued up' and 'clueless' to make my point that not everyone is unknowingly contributing to collective thought-forms. But then no word-play!
 
Have I touched a nerve?
I used to hate talk of being 'awakened' (and the notion of ascended masters and such-like). Yes, just as virtue-signalling and special as 'woke'. I could have said 'aware' and 'unaware' or 'clued up' and 'clueless' to make my point that not everyone is unknowingly contributing to collective thought-forms. But then no word-play!
Word play ought not be passed up!
 
Have I touched a nerve?

Eh? Please explain.



With regard to the 'trans agenda', I came across something curious whilst reading ‘Folk-lore & Folk Stories of Wales,’ by Marie Trevelyan. It was written in 1909 as a collection of 'eye-witness' accounts gathered from the previous 100 years:

"In some places there was an old story that if you passed under the rainbow, or it fell between you and other people, your sex would be changed."


skynews-rainbow-trail-coronavirus_4953090.jpg


Recently there were children all over the world placing rainbows in windows, i.e. between themselves and other people. The transgendered children had their own version in pink and blue - not a rainbow - they didn't need one as their sex had already been changed.

Is this just a coincidence?
 
Eh? Please explain.



With regard to the 'trans agenda', I came across something curious whilst reading ‘Folk-lore & Folk Stories of Wales,’ by Marie Trevelyan. It was written in 1909 as a collection of 'eye-witness' accounts gathered from the previous 100 years:

"In some places there was an old story that if you passed under the rainbow, or it fell between you and other people, your sex would be changed."



Recently there were children all over the world placing rainbows in windows, i.e. between themselves and other people. The transgendered children had their own version in pink and blue - not a rainbow - they didn't need one as their sex had already been changed.

Is this just a coincidence?
Interesting timing with today's news: FIFA backs UEFA as Germany blocked from lighting stadium in rainbow colours vs Hungary
FIFA back UEFA as Germany blocked from lighting up stadium in rainbow colours

I wonder if there's some significance in the science of rainbow, as well as the symbolism. Has the colour spectrum been shut down or some such?

Will Scarlet: Re: 'awakened' - you seemed to disparage the term. I can guess why, but aren't forum members waiting for people to 'wake up'? (Rhetorical question, no need to respond!)
 
THAT is an important distinction, between "awakened" and "woke." Many companies are starting to figure out that if they get woke, they go broke recently. I personally cannot stand the whole "woke" movement. Thus my reason for agreeing with your distinguishing between the two words.
On the topic of being woke, you cannot ignore the humorous irony of those in power: The Woke versus MyPillow
 
On the topic of being woke, you cannot ignore the humorous irony of those in power: The Woke versus MyPillow
The Woke are trying to break My Pillow, but it doesn't seem to be working out so well. People keep buying them anyhow. That if anything only reinforces the point you've made. I feel like I'm watching a comedy on tv. Too funny/ridiculous to be true, and yet all of it is. I'll withhold a joke about how great of a night's sleep they'd be getting if they bought one of those pillows, since no one is paying me for any ad work, but it's still quite hilarious.

*edited for spelling
 
Last edited:
Will Scarlet: Re: 'awakened' - you seemed to disparage the term.

Actually no, just people's need to use it as a personal characteristic or label. Imo, this forum is trying to make people aware of certain things that have been hidden from them, but will that 'awaken' anyone in the consciousness-changing, ego-busting sense? (That's a rhetorical answer. :) )

Perhaps it's a generational thing whereby the term "awakened" has changed its meaning over the years.
 
Actually no, just people's need to use it as a personal characteristic or label. Imo, this forum is trying to make people aware of certain things that have been hidden from them, but will that 'awaken' anyone in the consciousness-changing, ego-busting sense? (That's a rhetorical answer. :) )

Perhaps it's a generational thing whereby the term "awakened" has changed its meaning over the years.
The meanings and interpretations of words and their definitions certainly DOES change over time, and it CAN be generational, although I'd not say that it is necessarily always the case. A basic look at an etymology dictionary proves this true no matter which word one looks at. My overly verbose way of saying that I agree.
 
Interesting video produced by Bret Weinstein interviewing Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology.
Launched June 13, now with 16,700 comments and 1,244,500 views. Weinstein is about to get kicked off Youtube, just got his second strike.

Unfortunately the guy in the blue shirt doesn't know when to shutup, so can be aggravating to watch. Malone is in the white shirt and is softspoken, so not the best match.

Here is the money quote from the video:


"Spike protein is very dangerous, it's cytotoxic."



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY


The vaccines do not contain any biological components, no Spike protein, no chimpanzee adenovirus, or anything. Vials have been analyzed, 95% graphene oxide. Spike has been a diversionary maneuver. The goal of the plandemic was to inject people with graphene and distract with tales of viromancy.

IMG-20210626-131418-825.jpg

Esta noche a las 22:30 veremos lo que llevan las "vacunas* en directo LA QUINTA COLUMNA
 
Last edited:
The vaccines do not contain any biological components, no Spike protein, no chimpanzee adenovirus, or anything. Vials have been analyzed, 95% graphene oxide. Spike has been a diversionary maneuver. The goal of the plandemic was to inject people with graphene and distract with tales of viromancy.

IMG-20210626-131418-825.jpg

Esta noche a las 22:30 veremos lo que llevan las "vacunas* en directo LA QUINTA COLUMNA
Thank you for this information.
Here is a website about graphene

As always, could be a nice thing, but I'm afraid it is being used for not so nice purposes as well:

"The most advanced and promising areas in the biomedical field are currently those where graphene is used in a device configuration. For example, in Point-of-Care or In Vitro diagnostics, graphene can be used as a sensor and be duly functionalized to tune its sensing capabilities. Graphene-based neural interfaces have also demonstrated the possibility to not only detect wavelengths in the brain that cannot be detected with current metal-based technologies, but also to stimulate the tissue, opening up possibilities for new therapies."

Cinzia Spinato, Business Developer for biomedical applications for the Graphene Flagship
 
Regarding Vaccines and Aluminum Etc.

Whether or not there are any biological agents in the vaccine or not rather depends on whom you ask. The spike protein is actually found on the virus itself, regardless of being included in the vaccine or not. That much is fact. Some are saying that the spike proteins in question are man made, which would exempt them from the category of being biological, or at least %100 natural in the biological sense, BUT, the idea is that the mRNA contains instructions to cause the body that has been vaccinated to create the spike proteins in question, so it wasn't necessarily said that they were in the protein, at least not by everyone. As for the graphene and the things it can or potentially could do, that would fall in line with what is believed to be the aim of the outbreak in the first place, making humans controllable with outside stimulus, radio waves being only one that I've read about.

Of course that is not necessarily agreed upon by everyone and is a conspiracy theory currently, and is by some included with the threat that 5G poses due to the many types of waves that can be carried upon 5G. I honestly have no idea how much is a certainty (regarding weaponized 5G or not) but something certainly seems to be going on. I saw a video last night that posed a new theory, one I hadn't thought of before but that seems rather obvious, that being that China is preparing to invade the US and that the COVID-19 was just the first step, along with the filling of American organizations and governmental institutions with CCP agents. The only thing I know for certain is that my body already has a vaccine, it is called my immune system, and I'll take my chances with it and won't ever take another vaccine willingly.

Supposedly Russia has joined forces with China so as to do the same, that being the goal of the Communist countries for quite some time. The Russian fleet that was recent;y within 35 miles of Hawaii is one of the things that points to the prospect that such an idea may be more than fantasy. Of course, I can't say one thing or the other for certain, but if that were to happen, it wouldn't be good for anyone in the entire world, not that we are THAT important, but rather because we have always considered liberty to be the most important thing for all peoples of the world, not just the US. BTW, I am NOT an expert on any of these topics, I just read various things like everyone else does.

JR Nyquist Latest Details On China's Plan To Attack the United States

Artificial Spike Proteins and the End Of Human Health
 
Last edited:
Back
Top