Archive
Old SH Archive
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2020
- Messages
- 17,737
- Reaction score
- 3,167
Were it just me passing an opinion or belief I held or worse quoting the mainstream ad nauseum, the reasns why the things went out of use would be of no relevance but it's the man himself Mr Hancock and people who actually rode in the machines whose words are on that graces guide page and again in your quoted page above, its contemporary with the time the machines were in use AS far as we can tell from our perspective.Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: jd755Date: 2019-10-08 07:59:34Reaction Score: 1
All steam powered machines, indeed any machine that is fueled and moves, is inherently limited in how far it can travel before the fuel runs out.
These steam carriages had to carry coke and water. The operation of the engine consumed both of these resources and produced clinker ash and steam as well as locomotion. Ergo there had to be fresh supplies within the travelling distance of the onboard supplies or else it simply stopped moving.
There had to be stops to clear the ash and clinker as the efficiency of the machine fell to the point it wouldn't reach its next supply point. This stuff had to be cleared out to get the efficiency back up. I know because I have lived with coal and wood fired heating and hot water all my life nd witnessed steam engines, traction engines, large and small having their fireboxes cleared of clinker and ash and heard the tales from my mother of her father who was a railway worker at the locomotive shed where the raile riding locomotives were essentially taken apart to have firebox, boiler, tubes cleaned and repaired rather frequently.
Never mind the breakdowns mentioned by the people on the Graces guide page due to mechanical failure or the issue of smoke and wind getting to the passengers.
This isn't mainstream narrative its as close as we can get to the reality relating to these machines from today. To me always to me.