Exploring the technology of Prof. Nigel Cheese: Quantum Battery

[Dielectric]

Guys I have read both and will reply later as the horror's of reality demand I go to the store, the dump, and repair the mail box that some drunken crackhead knocked over. Can't wait and so much more. I need to get some stuff ordered so that I can mess around with this battery thingy and also 3D Bear check your conversations. I have a question about the grounding on the battery that I couldn't see in the video.

Ah...so hard to go deal with reality right now...

This is Nigel's main project and focus as far as I know right now. Before getting connected with Nigel I actually connected with one of his PCAM engineers down in Australia named Michael Tuckwell, who has been SUPER nice (and smart) and helpful to me as I've got started with Nigel's research. He actually has some cool videos of a monopole magnet build that I'm still working on replicating at home myself.

I have no idea what a PCAM is but maybe if I read the material you gave me I will find out. I will say that Clif High's radical linguistics reports forecast a new epoch (*at least 10 to 15 years ago) in which these future forecasts had a section devoted to what Clif termed "SciFi World" and which includes, quote; "the new electrics." I am confident that is what we are monkeying with right now with this Quantum Battery and Nigel's other invention, this PCAM thingy.

Accretion Disks: Think Tesla's Turbine here, but in space and vacuuming up surrounding space, or so we are told they are vacuuming up surrounding space, and then converting that supposed vacuum into energy and matter. Now does that make any sense to you? Well let's just push or little tiny non-PHD un-certified brains onwards.

Accretion disks power galactic jets in much the same way a Tesla Turbine is said to work. A magnet is a very close approximation of a galactic jet. How close is what we are trying to determine precisely. I think they are basically identical.

A galactic jet is similar to a Ranque-Hilsch Counter Rotational Votex Tube. There are a number of variations on the Ranque-Hilsch tube but the ones that have cold air being ejected out one end and hot out the other are the ones which are most similar because Galactic Jets eject planetary scale crap out both ends. Only difference seems to be that one is self powered and lives in outer space and the other takes an air compressor and an electrical cord.

In a galactic jet the matter/energy (*Creation from the supposed vacuum of space right?) is ejected out either end in vast quantities, or on a planetary scale so to speak: Ken has a video where he briefly mentions the scale of this thing but it's very big. The source I cited is an excellent source on Astrophysics and highly recommended in this area.

Notice the connection here to superfluids continues to this day in research. So the accretion disks are said to be double layered and hidden, which is code for "invisible" in astrophysics and means, apparently, dielectric counterspatial medium.

In other words, these disks that a spinning are in counterspace and invisible and hidden but in the middle of no where in outer space, and then we suddenly have this thingy blowing crap out like no tomorrow and on a planetary scale but without any visible explanation how? Splain that one right? So this is why they are called, quote; "hidden accretion disks." I had to decipher this out on my own because we cannot have anything referencing some sort of counterspatial medium which isn't in the official narrative. So it's the ether and yes the ether is counterspatially located and thus invisible, but even so it envelopes all reality as space envelopes the atmosphere of our planet.

Quote from the Holographicblogspot.
" Superfluid earth labs have discovered everything real that a phony black hole is supposed to be doing: (1) Superfluids absorb, trap, capture, or slow light speed way down in what is called a "Bose Einstein Condensate" which is a misinterpretation term used exclusively in relativity for laboratory superfluids.(2) Superfluids form an insulating double layered "concealing accretion disk" where originate bipolar jets that carry electric currents and form Birkeland currents that shape the spinning galaxy. (3) Superfluid helium forms spiral arm Kapitza filaments where stars form inside. (4) Spinning superfluids carry the angular momentum in quantized vortices that carry electric currents that produce associated cosmic scale magnetic fields and vice versa. "

Kapitza Superfluid Jet Powered Spider Galaxy Cosmology Model

What would these accretion disk's look like then? * Notice that my esteemed source say's these disk are, quote; "hidden double layered accretion disks." So apparently astrophysicists have already theorized that something like the image below are what these things look like and that they are vacuuming up the surrounding space. Apparently space is dark and nobody can see these, but they can see everything else, they can see something is ejecting crap all over for no visible or rational reason.

I mentioned this now rare book by Harry Stein, and entitled; "Mind Machines You Can Build" Now if you print these vortices off, or you can simply draw something similar with clockwise and counter-clockwise rotations, or if you take two swastika's, with one left facing and the other right facing, and then have someone close their eyes and put those in their hands with their arms outstretched, and obviously both schematics facing up so as to maintain the opposed fields of rotation, then what you should get is that one hand will seem heavier than the other. Further, there is apparently evidence that some simple circuits do not even need to exist in a material form and or that parts can simply be drawn with an ink pen to connect one part to another to result in working device. If you hunt you can probably find this book in a PDF on the net.

Ok lots and lots and lots more but let me stop here for the time being or I'll be typing all night.

Forgot the most important part naturally...lol!~
These disks are where? They are in counterspace right? What are they then vacuuming up? Obviously counterspatial medium and it's this medium we have, ourselves, conjectured must be the basis of matter and that's what these so-called galactic jets are ejecting out both ends.

I'd love to say vomiting out both ends because understanding this, and in a public domain, well I imagine that might make some persons suffer the same physiological outcomes; after all we are talking here about boundless energy creation and with some degree of understanding how that takes place.

These things are creating matter but from where? Obviously from an invisible source; from counterspace itself.
Remember I said you had a unique ability to ask important and significant questions?

This thread has already helped me tie together lose ends and this one is probably the most significant of them all. Now we can get back to the meat of the matter and which is where Flexus asked; "What makes counterspace leave," and now that we know one way it does it we can think about how best to coax more out of it right?

 

[Dielectric]

What is Nigel's Quantum Battery: In the most basic form its two small thin magnets with zinc, damp/wet paper, and copper sandwiched in between, ideally with the paper soaked in a 5 - 10% magnesium solution. I found that adding in an actual thin piece of magnesium ribbon strip between the paper and zinc gave a significant boost in voltage. In further experimenting I've learned many factors play into the QB performance, hence it's a new technology in need of proper development. The materials chosen, their thickness & density, their polar and axial alignment, the water/solution soaking the paper/cellulose layer; all of these are factors I've seen the changes in first hand. I've even replaced the copper for cheap pyrolytic graphite and tried aluminum foil to replace the magnesium all to different effects. Currently the highest voltage I'm seeing is from this layer combo for a single cell: [magnet, pyrolytic graphite, wet/damp cardstock, magnesium, zinc, magnet] Simple stack on in the same order to increase voltage. [NOTE: I only got to ~1.8V on a cell after aligning the magnets and materials. hint, zinc should be 90 degree to graphite or copper layer]

What I find interesting here is the specific reference to putting the the zinc in at a 90 degree angle. Not quite sure what you mean by that but considering the following it is likely to be important.

So my idea of a time delay was indeed incorrect. I can tell you, if I hadn't seen this concept in a Vsauce video some years ago, I would not have understood this explanation without pictures. This makes so much more sense, although I still don't understand how one would take advantage of this like Ken says. I also don't understand why this torque happens in the first place.

Yes, it seems you are correct, but as far as we know this "time delay" is not to be misunderstood as monkeying with time itself, but rather explainable by resistance to change in angular rotation.

If a wheel, that is not spinning, is suspended from one end of its axle by a string and then is allowed to drop some distance it will oscillate side to side like a pendulum.

A spinning wheel will react differently. In this case the point where the string connects to the axle will form a pivot point and then the whole rest of the axle and spinning wheel will rotate around the pivot point describing a circle as it rotates, and the string from it's suspended is the center point of this circle about which the whole is now rotating. Precession is said to cause this action and I know everyone has seen this demonstrated with toy gyro's and a string, although truly understanding it an entirely other matter.

The Wozz: A Gyroscopic Spinning Top, Stays Spinning For Over 30 Minutes

Ok, that's that, but now the explanations begin, and of course bear in mind here the mantra that "math cannot lie." Well maybe the math cannot lie, but that doesn't mean the story described by the math isn't anything but fictional: Something every policeman and parent should know instinctively is the creativity of lying by children and criminals alike, yet somehow when it comes to what we think we know, and especially in education where they punish you with an F grade for not validating the ...cough...inventive explanations, because of these so called mathematical proofs there is absolute self inflicted blindness to the use of mathematics in story telling.

Gravity is ultimately said to be the reason that torque is produced in this example.

Officially the action is described as follows:
From a mathematical point of view, this phenomena occurs because of the vector addition of the existing angular momentum of the spinning wheel and the angular momentum that is added due to the torque (due to gravity). Creation explanation> * because torque is caused by gravity.

Now the second part and without visuals this is impossible to understand and even then...

Go read through this because this illustration, not their's either but from some unknown text book, is worth the effort.
Spinning Bike Wheel Example, how is angular momentum conserved?

The torque on the wheel points in a direction perpendicular to the existing angular momentum of the spinning wheel (right-hand- rule). Hence it increases the angular momentum in a direction perpendicular to it. This changes the angular momentum and causes the wheel to rotate in the horizontal plane instead of falling and oscillating in the vertical plane.

Also it's not like I know how this works either. I think this is what Kozyrev torsional physics may explain. Don't let the title here mislead you. This is the first bit of information that I've come across that seems to condense the work of Kozyrev in torsional physics.

This is why I was pleased to find some information on Kozyrev's torsional physics. I have a direct link to Claude Swanson's Article on Kozyrev's Torsional Physics & entitled; "The Torsion Field And The Aura." Kozyrevs' torsion physics is sometimes cited by others, and whom also are clueless what it is about, and so I was and am a bit excited to get this information. This link should open directly to the PDF itself. So far it's been enlightening and probably does explain where this torsion comes from.
https://journals.sfu.ca/seemj/index.php/seemj/article/download/425/386


We know from Rawls and Davis that the magnetic field has some influence upon growth via this phase disparity between the poles, and which some have described as time altering. I'm not sure that is at all accurate. That it is changing and directly influencing living biology cannot be denied, but altering time is quite another matter and one to be wary of leaping on to.
Albert Roy DAVIS / Walter RAWLS Biomagnetism

So, it turns out that torque is explained as being the product of gravity. That's what I'm getting out of this.

 

[Fexus]

What I find interesting here is the specific reference to putting the the zinc in at a 90 degree angle. Not quite sure what you mean by that but considering the following it is likely to be important.

Yes, it seems you are correct, but as far as we know this "time delay" is not to be misunderstood as monkeying with time itself, but rather explainable by resistance to change in angular rotation.

If a wheel, that is not spinning, is suspended from one end of its axle by a string and then is allowed to drop some distance it will oscillate side to side like a pendulum.

A spinning wheel will react differently. In this case the point where the string connects to the axle will form a pivot point and then the whole rest of the axle and spinning wheel will rotate around the pivot point describing a circle as it rotates, and the string from it's suspended is the center point of this circle about which the whole is now rotating. Precession is said to cause this action and I know everyone has seen this demonstrated with toy gyro's and a string, although truly understanding it an entirely other matter.

View attachment 20944​

The Wozz: A Gyroscopic Spinning Top, Stays Spinning For Over 30 Minutes

Ok, that's that, but now the explanations begin, and of course bear in mind here the mantra that "math cannot lie." Well maybe the math cannot lie, but that doesn't mean the story described by the math isn't anything but fictional: Something every policeman and parent should know instinctively is the creativity of lying by children and criminals alike, yet somehow when it comes to what we think we know, and especially in education where they punish you with an F grade for not validating the ...cough...inventive explanations, because of these so called mathematical proofs there is absolute self inflicted blindness to the use of mathematics in story telling.

Gravity is ultimately said to be the reason that torque is produced in this example.

Officially the action is described as follows:
From a mathematical point of view, this phenomena occurs because of the vector addition of the existing angular momentum of the spinning wheel and the angular momentum that is added due to the torque (due to gravity). Creation explanation> * because torque is caused by gravity.

Now the second part and without visuals this is impossible to understand and even then...

View attachment 20945​

Go read through this because this illustration, not there's either but from some unknown text book, is worth the effort.
Spinning Bike Wheel Example, how is angular momentum conserved?

The torque on the wheel points in a direction perpendicular to the existing angular momentum of the spinning wheel (right-hand- rule). Hence it increases the angular momentum in a direction perpendicular to it. This changes the angular momentum and causes the wheel to rotate in the horizontal plane instead of falling and oscillating in the vertical plane.

Also it's not like I know how this works either. I think this is what Kozyrev torsional physics may explain. Don't let the title here mislead you. This is the first bit of information that I've come across that seems to condense the work of Kozyrev in torsional physics.

This is why I was pleased to find some information on Kozyrev's torsional physics. I have a direct link to Claude Swanson's Article on Kozyrev's Torsional Physics & entitled; "The Torsion Field And The Aura." Kozyrevs' torsion physics is sometimes cited by others, and whom also are clueless what it is about, and so I was and am a bit excited to get this information. This link should open directly to the PDF itself. So far it's been enlightening and probably does explain where this torsion comes from.
https://journals.sfu.ca/seemj/index.php/seemj/article/download/425/386


We know from Rawls and Davis that the magnetic field has some influence upon growth via this phase disparity between the poles, and which some have described as time altering. I'm not sure that is at all accurate. That it is changing and directly influencing living biology cannot be denied, but altering time is quite another matter and one to be wary of leaping on to.
Albert Roy DAVIS / Walter RAWLS Biomagnetism

So, it turns out that torque is explained as being the product of gravity. That's what I'm getting out of this.

I will be replying in full later. I just wanted to attach this awesome video that taught me this principle originally:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHGKIzCcVa0

 

[3D Printing Bear]

Quite honestly I have not even had time to think, we are moving so fast, let alone consider deeply what you've said in previous posts, though in all instances, or most, I have seen or brushed upon the material you have presented.

Fast indeed!! I could not be more impressed by the intellect and depth of knowledge dropped in responses on this thread so far. It's much more than I anticipated with this post but I'm totally thrilled.

I do not know enough to agree or disagree about transverse or so-called scalar waves. I think scalar is what Nikolai Kozyrev called torsional waves. I just began reading this a day or two before coming back to Stolen History and discovering this thread so I haven't finished reading the whole thing but here possibly might be an answer. Scalar has always been somewhat bamboozling a name to me personally so I was hoping to get a better grasp on this by reading this information below.

Pages 64 & 65. "The Torsion Field And The Aura"
THE TORSION FIELD AND THE AURA | Swanson | Subtle Energies & Energy Medicine Journal Archives
THE TORSION FIELD AND THE AURA | Semantic Scholar

This will be interested to read up on. I've always had a similar view of scalar waves and the terminology thereof. Torsion is concept I can wrap my brain around a little more easily so this sounds like a great addition to the discussion. I think I've got like 2 years worth of excellent reading material from a few days of responses from you fantastically smart folks!

My "present" understanding is that the dielectric field is around us at all times. That the dielectric is the counterspatial medium in which we exist and are created from. It is as though we were fish in the ocean and the Universe is our ocean, only it is an invisible sea we swim in and like fish we are unaware of what we exist in. Tesla talking about radiant energy being all around us comes to mind.

I like this description. =] It seems like there are many times the most accurate analogy to the "dielectric ether" is an ocean or fluid from which all thinks take shape and exist within. I'd never thought of it as counterspace before but I really appreciate that idea getting bought up because the more I think about it the more it makes sense. The 'Space Counterspace' book I look forward to reading.

Rocks and specifically quartz rocks, along with others, should slow down the dielectric. It is probably not surprising that this is the case since quartz acts like a prism, and if a prism is only truly manipulating the ether itself, and which becomes visible as light, then the geometry of crystalline structures can cause the light/ether to fracture into an array of colors, and we know that these colors have specific properties which include magnetic properties, and if this is the case then it is also the case that one could slow the process by refraction.
The Magnetic Personality of Violet
(*I tried very hard to make this as big a salad as possible)

If magnetism is the manifestation of a slowed inertial dielectric medium, then the crystalline geometry of molecules that form the structured crystals of matter are what is responsible for the creation of magnetic fields on planetary bodies. Not that this is the only means by which magnetic poles develop on planets but it should be a primary source for the production of magnetic poles to begin from.

Aww the beauty and constant presence of Geometry! You touched on something I think is very important to how dielectric flows and pressures are "manifested". So much seems to come down to the atomic and molecular structure of matter as to how it reacts to various energies and fields. Nigel mentioned this to me regarding the structure of the metals in the QB and how the magnetic field passes through them and different angles, hence my learning that the zinc should be 90 degrees off from the copper or pyroyltic graphite.

That bit about violet light making steel magnetic is crazy! I had no idea there was a "silent war" going on against voilet within the rainbow....

I think that it is reasonable to consider that the power of a magnet is defined by it's ability to slow the dielectric field. I mean that seems reasonable to me as a beginning, and to which I would add that I also think a function of the geometry of the crystals in the metals that comprise the make up of the magnet are critical, and that those must have an organized structure to get the greatest effect, and those factors along with the density of the crystals, or unit's per volume are what probably defines the strength of a conventional magnet.
I've gone off the rails huh? Wasn't what you were looking for and probably rightly so regarding the strength of a magnet/magnetic field.
I'm not saying you're wrong about this. I'm saying It isn't clear to me because of what I think I understand, however..

I think you're touching on all the aspects of the detailed atomic molecular properties of materials that give rise to the slowing of the dielectric field (i.e. magnetism) and don't think it's off the rails at all. Granted... finding/building to tools and equations to accurately measure and test it all is of course another story, but I do think you're hitting on all the right material properties to look at. =]

 

[Dielectric]

It is a good concise video and I do appreciate it. I think it clearly does a good job, but the video explains these actions as caused by gravity. It's gravity does this and gravity causes that.

So remembering that we are addressing this quantum battery and why it's doing what it is doing is our purpose, and so as to kind of keep us on track here, I think that the idea here is that gravity is responsible for a reactionary torque to a spinning object and having something to do with right angle turns.

The explanations given in the video are not wrong per say, but rather that these actions/re-actions hinge on gravity, and which is in no way addressed, but which is the key to comprehending the action & reactions, and also (interestingly) I don't think I've ever seen any video's by anyone which deals with the upwards propulsive properties as explained below taken from the link I cited and which are worth taking note of.

Reply by kuruman
Yes, sorry, I was a bit hasty with my explanation. The angular momentum vector that points up in the "final" picture is the vector sum of the spin of the person plus chair, the spin of the wheel and the orbital angular momentum of the spinning wheel. Stricly speaking, there should be three vectors drawn in the "final" picture, two of which are up and have a combined magnitude of twice the magnitude of the down vector.
Reference: Spinning Bike Wheel Example, how is angular momentum conserved?

Could the placement of Zinc at a 90 degree inclination maybe also play some role in the Quantum Battery reaction which is similar to the effect of gravity?

I'm guessing that the crystalline structure is the reason it's producing a change. There's a reason that 90 degrees offset produces an outcome substantially different than if it were not at a 90 degree angle. It could be as simple as knowing that Zinc is a diamagnetic. A diamagnetic is a a dielectric reflector, a mirror to magnetism, but is it going to reorient the magnetic by 90 degree's? That doesn't seem likely but it does seem likely that it would change the angle by diamagnetic reflection of the magnetic field.

Some home grown experiments might be in order to find that one out more.

In my mind this improvement produced by the orientation of the Zinc would seem to correlate with the discussion obliquely. What we are missing here is that we have magnets, super magnets right, and which are key to the Quantum Battery, but where is the reciprocal? Does a reciprocal to a neodymium magnet even exist?

See, I just bet you that there is a reciprocal, and I think that reciprocal is going to involve silver. Silver because it has a high melting point and is highly diamagnetic. Magnets have been around since forever and we think and talk about those all the time, but a reciprocal diamagnetic reflector that bends or reflects the magnetic? If that does exist it is hiding somewhere. Possibly in a MIC's vault (*military Industrial complex), or out in plain sight but totally un-noticed: Have to do some searching is the idea.

If there's been this focus on how to create really strong magnets then you can just about be positive the reverse is also true, and that the reason we have super magnets today has more to do with capitalizing on their development as a means to profit from their development, or recoup part of the expense of R& D in this field., but the object to their development is almost certain to be aimed at other ends.

To my mind this is the way the system works: Anything that's been developed for other purposes has made it's way to the market under what is essentially a covert means. Like looky here, this neat'0 super magnets we just invented, or here for 1952 is the all new Radar Range. So using that kind of distorted view it is logical to think that somewhere there already exists a super diamagnetic reflector, and such thing is just about one step from an gravity shield.

Gravity (in all instances) is defined as an acceleration, and in Wheelers' explanation, gravity is defined as an acceleration towards counterspace, and by an incoherent dielectric field, and which is what we might describe as a field of static dielectricity accelerating towards a coherent magnetic field, and that is because the coherent magnetic field has a counterspatial vortex at it's core.
(*I know you know this, I'm just stating it for others)

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Added this. Not too sure about adding this but I am sure it will be entertaining at the very least.

I like this description. =] It seems like there are many times the most accurate analogy to the "dielectric ether" is an ocean or fluid from which all thinks take shape and exist within. I'd never thought of it as counterspace before but I really appreciate that idea getting bought up because the more I think about it the more it makes sense. The 'Space Counterspace' book I look forward to reading.

Trust me, most of that book is beyond me. I'm no mathematician for sure. Geometry is spatial and more readily understood by myself. I only cited the book, and hunted it up to have on hand for others whom are adept with the mathematics, and to show that there are some very deep and serious texts which delve in to this topic. I just wanted to show that this is not some crackpot concept that's half baked which I think suggests that such an omission cannot be anything but intentional.

The way I understand counterspace is that it is everywhere, it's right there next to us right now, only it's another space counter to our own. Remember me talking about these invisible tubes that run out from our brains and through counterspace, and which then connect back to our brains forming halo's? What we are calling the ether/counterspace/hyperspace, these are what the Hindu's call the God Vishnu, and who is the source of all creation in that religion.

Vishnu is the All-Pervading One, derived from “vis’ in Sanskrit which means both ‘to spread’ and ‘to be present everywhere’.

A little hesitant about going here next but in for penny in for a pound right? This is way off from the topic and then again maybe not.
Near as I've been able to determine there are two aspects to this counter-spatial domain. One is physical and one is incorporeal and mental that involves consciousness.

Now to our brain washed western minds this place, this counterspace, it's got to be something like an energy field, or it's something like another dimension, which is the result of mathematical savants mental masturbations gone wild, and those sorts of understanding are likely where science fiction scribblers, and some theoretical ideas come from, especially those that have come from wacked out mathematical savants whom have mathematically proven that there are other alternative worlds, that for example if you could just jump one second back or ahead there would be the whole world but devoid of people: These are fantasies.

I am by no means an expert on counterspace, I am not even a novice, but it isn't what we Westerner's think it might be. Not from what I've been able to cobble together anyways. For starters counterspace is not a place matter exists in. It is incorporeal and the closest thing to describing what it is would probably be a dream; a dream of the Universe.

It is not a dream world however much it may seem to be one for these whom may make the travel and it isn't a hallucination induced by certain drugs that aid in getting access to it either. Nobody I've listened to who have gone there says anything that makes me conclude this is all just some wacky shared experience.

We have to recognize that there is strong evidence that you can go in to counterspace and that it is an incorporeal space where the intellect of the Universe is contained and which contains the consciousness of life throughout the universe; this has been known for a long time by some peoples. The knowledge is ancient to human beings. To do this requires almost all people to use natures help. After all, you're created from nature. Mostly the reason natures drugs are illegal is because in that place you can meet the consciousness of other beings and this is something the powers that be absolutely cannot have because it is a direct threat to their power for a host of reason.

This may all sound a little wacked out but it is described by some pretty serious people so it's not something an intelligent person can simply dismiss, and more importantly it's repeatable, which is the very foundation of the scientific process, so you can enter this space and stay there, and interact with other beings consciousness whom are there, and often times I'm told they are there for the express purpose hoping to make contact with human beings.

The only thing is you just cannot access it in a physical form, but mentally you can access it, and this is what has been reported by people I would take very seriously. Now the system has explained these experiences as drug induced hallucinations and muddied the waters by intentionally flooding world with artificially contrived dopes, and so for most people just seeing what a crackhead looks like is enough to convince them that all drugs are horrible, except those handed out by their doctor, those are of course completely safe right? So mostly the war on drugs had a specific intent to destroy and to discredit those whom have tried to bring this understanding out. Probably why the indigenous peoples had to be wiped out is that they all understood this.

Traveling via counterspace is what we would call teleportation. Anywhere you can think to go your mind can take you there instantaneously, it's just that you don't know that, but there are known examples of this taking place and which cannot be explained by any other means. Today we might call this quantum tunneling.

We being on a physical plane understand counter space is the dielectric field. I used to think it was possible to travel across the Universe using this field with machines, specifically the tetrahedronal shaped ones, but today I'm not at all sure about that, nor am I sure that is the way to do it; to cross the galaxy.

From what I now think I understand, and which is largely based on the stories I've been told about interactions with the consciousness of other life that so called psychonauts have reported, it can be conjectured that any real alien UFO's we are witnessing may be created in-situ (*on-the-spot), and out of the ether itself. There is almost no other possible way that I can conceive which can explain some of the phenomena which has been captured on video, and when it comes to reports of physical encounters the variety and incomprehensible natue of the reported physical bodies of these range from the fantastical to the completely irrational. It is as if they came out of a crazy dream in many instances.

The thing about all this is that we ourselves, specifically Flexus, seems to have validated this idea that the reality is created from the immaterial and if that's the case then anything is possible.

 

[3D Printing Bear]

Guys I have read both and will reply later as the horror's of reality demand I go to the store, the dump, and repair the mail box that some drunken crackhead knocked over. Can't wait and so much more. I need to get some stuff ordered so that I can mess around with this battery thingy and also 3D Bear check your conversations. I have a question about the grounding on the battery that I couldn't see in the video.

Ah...so hard to go deal with reality right now...

Ahhh... the menial demands of life. =] All is well and there is of course no time limits, constraints, or expectations when it comes to this thread or the discussions therein, at least from me anyway. I did check my conversations though and didn't see a question about grounding though, perhaps it didn't send? Hit me up anytime regardless and I'll do my best to answer. Hopefully my next video will answer some questions for people.

I have no idea what a PCAM is but maybe if I read the material you gave me I will find out. I will say that Clif High's radical linguistics reports forecast a new epoch (*at least 10 to 15 years ago) in which these future forecasts had a section devoted to what Clif termed "SciFi World" and which includes, quote; "the new electrics." I am confident that is what we are monkeying with right now with this Quantum Battery and Nigel's other invention, this PCAM thingy.

Yet another interesting topic to go look up. And yes I think you're right. I haven't even mentioned the LED based computing concept Nigel has talked about, which would theoretically be in three dimensions and process at the speed of light. "Quantum Computing eat your heart out." You're touching onto one of the many reasons I'm so compelled to build, experiment, and prove out these devices and concepts. I'm hoping this summer to get a basic foundry/casting setup to turn 3D prints into metal/alloy forms to test with.

What would these accretion disk's look like then? * Notice that my esteemed source say's these disk are, quote; "hidden double layered accretion disks." So apparently astrophysicists have already theorized that something like the image below are what these things look like and that they are vacuuming up the surrounding space. Apparently space is dark and nobody can see these, but they can see everything else, they can see something is ejecting crap all over for no visible or rational reason.

I had never thought about the accretion disk concept to the magnetic/dielectric inertial plane until you first mentioned it. I frankly have not spent much time in the world of Astrophysics and galactic behavior. This notion of a 'hidden double layered accretion disk' makes sense in my mind then it comes to the dual-directional field inertia going on within a magnetic. From what Nigel and I believe Ken have discovered and mentioned is this positive and negative inertia in both directions, and the idea of that duplicating the accretion disk "layer" makes at least some sense to me. I'm hardly any form of expert though...

A spinning wheel will react differently. In this case the point where the string connects to the axle will form a pivot point and then the whole rest of the axle and spinning wheel will rotate around the pivot point describing a circle as it rotates, and the string from it's suspended is the center point of this circle about which the whole is now rotating. Precession is said to cause this action and I know everyone has seen this demonstrated with toy gyro's and a string, although truly understanding it an entirely other matter.

After reading and seeing this the statement/equation Nigel has made many times continues to make more sense: ∏>∞ (pi > infinity) which he does various proofs of that I've seen but not fully "walked through" myself. I need more time to study!

Also it's not like I know how this works either. I think this is what Kozyrev torsional physics may explain. Don't let the title here mislead you. This is the first bit of information that I've come across that seems to condense the work of Kozyrev in torsional physics.

This is why I was pleased to find some information on Kozyrev's torsional physics. I have a direct link to Claude Swanson's Article on Kozyrev's Torsional Physics & entitled; "The Torsion Field And The Aura." Kozyrevs' torsion physics is sometimes cited by others, and whom also are clueless what it is about, and so I was and am a bit excited to get this information. This link should open directly to the PDF itself. So far it's been enlightening and probably does explain where this torsion comes from.
https://journals.sfu.ca/seemj/index.php/seemj/article/download/425/386

Yet another interesting piece to the puzzle that will cool to check out. I'm hugely impressed how much you've looked into this wide and deep topic. I feel like I'm running out of useful input at this point with my sheer lack of knowledge, but I love the discussion and am learning a great deal as this thread develops.

YES! YES! YES! Ken said almost the exact same although I probably won't be able to find the video in which he did it anymore but I'm pretty sure I accurately remember his words: "light is nothing other than an incorporeal magnet".

I thought I remember Ken saying pretty much the same thing as well but have really only just randomly watched a bunch of his videos over the last several months. I was just happy to find two different smart people saying MANY of the same things about magnetism. =]

I saw those equations in his book though I haven't read enough to actually understand what is meant by magnetic energy. That point of infinity is likely his understanding of counterspace, which is infinite but also has no spatial locus and dimensions. I think Ken would agree with that (not to put any words in his mouth though).

I have spent a woefully small amount of time gathering together all of Nigel's equations to piece them all together in a useful order to myself. There are a few videos where he goes into the details of the magnetic mass as it get translated out to his ME/I = E equation but again, I need more time to look into it all. I've been having a difficult enough time just recording new QB videos lately....

Few people know that he was heavily involved in Tesla's AC generator which would have been mostly unusable if it hadn't been for Steinmetz. With his ability to predict the behaviour of machines using his established formulas (which he derived from previous works of Heaviside and Maxwell), he was an unstoppable force and I'm sure he would be celebrated as a hero much like Einstein today if it wouldn't be for the circumstances of this current world...

I did not actually know that about Steinmetz working with Tesla's AC generator. Talk about a brilliant group at that period in time. Makes one wonder how much they discovered vs. just re-discovered from much older knowledge, especially considering the main topics of this wonderful site!

The common analogy used for transverse vs scalar/longitudinal has to do with water. Have you ever tried to talk with a friend while underwater? The sound waves seems to be propagating very quickly but what about the waves on the surface of the water? Those classic waves we see all the time which expand in a circular manner and deminish over time and distance? Those are wayyyyy slower than the sound waves underwater. The difference is longitudinal waves vs transverse waves. Longitudinal waves are fast and transverse waves are slow. Transverse waves only occur at the border of a medium. This is super super important for later because this is one of the most revealing phenomena for when it comes to the properties of the ether. But as I said, transverse waves occur only at the border of a medium. If a body of water was infinitely large, there would be no transverse waves because you would never get to a surface. There would only be longitudinal waves. Only longitudinal waves eventually give rise to transverse waves. This is also important to note.

I like this analogy and have not heard of or read it before. It certainly sparks my desire to dive as far into wave/field theory and math as much as I can, as well as pick up useful books on the topic like some already recommended by yourself and dielectric. Either way this is the best mental picture I've come across of transverse and longitudinal waves.

What is your reason for assuming that a slowing down of the dielectric is what causes magnetism? Seems a little counter-intuitive to me. I thought a speeding up would be more plausible. If ether/counterspace/the dielectric field is synonymous with rest, then it shouldn't move at all, no? After all, since space does not exist in counterspace, there can't be any movement in it either. Only through a disturbance of the ether does it "speed up" and turn into a discharge into space. Ken does indeed say that magnetism creates mass and volume, but he also said that a black hole is a supermass where "dielectricity has overthrown magnetisms ability to keep the mass within the visible/spatial universe" which would imply that it is possible to bring masses into counterspace by means of amplified dielectricity.

I am pretty confident that I AM wrong about this by the way. There are still gaps in my logic which are indicators that some of my ideas are still incorrect.

I had a random thought on this all the sudden that might be TOTAL nonsense, but here it goes: What is the acceleration of the dielectric paired with the resulting inertial deceleration that gives rise to the dual-pole field flow we see in magnetism? I have NO concrete basis for this in terms of a theoretical model however, so please let me know if it makes little to no sense. =]

 

[Dielectric]

Ok, well I know that one sent you off in to ether, so to return to the topic of counterspace I found this video which gives some visual clues about it, which may help when you encounter it so that you recognize what you're dealing with, demonstrated here by using a Lakhovsky Mulitwave Oscillation Transformer. I believe this was constructed by Eric Dollard and Aaron Murakami. Aaron describes the machine in the first six minutes and then from about 6:30 you get a demonstration using different tubes filled with gases.



The point of this demonstration has to do with recognizing when you're encountering counterspace, which may be important because this may happen while experimenting, and if so this video may help you recognize when you are seeing something which is counterspatially located. It will either be pitch black or shadow like.

This darkness is a distinctive property seen in many UFO's and as dark to pitch black voids, which look like portholes, or the entire base can be pitch black or there can be rings or black banding, and also counterspatial traveling UFO's have been recorded resemble a boiling pitch black cloud. There is one specifically that was taken by air and when stabilized the video clearly shows a pitch black boiling cloud traveling along smoothly and silently. Some of the propulsion systems which leave black telltale counterspatial rings hanging in the air which are often called mysterious smoke rings that appear out of no where. There's lots of those shown on social media and usually labeled as a mysterious smoke ring. Tesla had an experience with counterspace that was said have draped the trees and fences and which stuck around for several days. Can't find the source but I'm sure if it's true then it must be know to Tesla fans as this was reported in the local papers of the time.

​

 

[Dielectric]

The idea here with the demo of counter space is that to my mind it validates what Wheeler said about the magnetic fields black void as a voidance of the dielectric field. So if I can get someone to make one of these batteries and put the ground in that dark space we might be able to validate the idea that ground is counter, or that this dielectric void is counterspatial. So that was the idea behind the video; to think about how to make ground.

 

[Fexus]

Alright folks, sorry I didn't reply over the weekend. After replying to the latest comments, I will be going into the sources that have been posted here. Primarily Nigel's book (and comparing it to Ken's). So there will be some radio silence from my side for a couple days.

Before we move forward, I think we should make sure that we are on the same page on everything. My reply will be further below.
I think we should all state our opinions/knowledge on certain matters to ensure that none of our future discussions generate any noise.
The reason I'm proposing this is because I sometimes feel like we are talking about different things without realizing it.

I will post some statements/questions to which I would like you to give short answers:

1) Do you consider "(a)ether", "counterspace", "dielectric field", "point of infinity" and "dielectric counterspatial medium" to all be different words for the same thing?
2) What is the ether?
3) Strictly talking, do you consider the ether/the dielectric field to be a fluid?
4) What is force and what is inertia?
5) Is manifestation the result of (a) force?

My answers:
1) Yes.
2) "In the Universe, however, there are no signs of the degradation which is described in the Second Law [of Thermodynamics]. Stars die and are born again. The Universe sparkles with inexhaustible variety." (Kozyrev, 1958) This implies that energy is infinite and never lost. Nothing physical is infinite though, therefore I assume that energy is matephysical which means that the ether is energy.
3) No, I think the ether is just one thing. Not made up of multiple particles. Counterspatial disturbances are instantaneous because the ether is only one thing.
4) Inertia is rest. Since manifestation requires energy, an impotency of energy will result in a return to ether. I like to imagine the ether as a rubber band. When you stretch a part of it, you have to expend energy to keep it that way. Once no more energy is available to keep it stretched, it returns to its original state. Expenditure of energy is force, whereas a return to rest/energy is inertia.
5) Yes, I guess I already implied that above.

Ok, now my reply:

I have to admit, I still don't understand how gravity is not the cause for the torque. Of course, an isolated atom won't have any gravity to affect its torque so yes there MUST be something else to it. I hope I manage to wrap my head around that concept during the next few days. I found a part in Ken's book that might help, but I can't quite decipher it yet:

"The feature of a spinning gyroscope is that it appears to defy gravity and precess, whereas a non-spinning gyroscope falls down. The
cause of the precessional motion and the gyroscope’s stability toward falling is attributed to the external force of gravity, however this
is incorrect, it is due to centrifugally spinning mass moving against a centripetal field locus created at the center of the flywheel from
counter-natural movement, and this likewise is the counterspatial torque inherent to a physical gyroscope causing its precession, and
exerts a torque "sideways" on the angular momentum vector. This torque produces the non-intuitive result of precession. By analogy,
in the presence of an applied dielectric field, the coupling of the magnetic polarized reciprocation with the dielectric field produces a
torque that precesses the expanding Z-axis radial magnetic vectors and causes them to precess about the dielectric field movement."

So, I'm sorry I can't yet reply to your thorough posts about this, Dielectric. Give me some time :^)

Another thing I'm still not getting is the idea of the plane of inertia in general, honestly. I have no idea what its role is in the magnetic field and why there would be two of them.

Ok, well I know that one sent you off in to ether, so to return to the topic of counterspace I found this video which gives some visual clues about it, which may help when you encounter it so that you recognize what you're dealing with, demonstrated here by using a Lakhovsky Mulitwave Oscillation Transformer. I believe this was constructed by Eric Dollard and Aaron Murakami. Aaron describes the machine in the first six minutes and then from about 6:30 you get a demonstration using different tubes filled with gases.



The point of this demonstration has to do with recognizing when you're encountering counterspace, which may be important because this may happen while experimenting, and if so this video may help you recognize when you are seeing something which is counterspatially located. It will either be pitch black or shadow like.

This darkness is a distinctive property seen in many UFO's and as dark to pitch black voids, which look like portholes, or the entire base can be pitch black or there can be rings or black banding, and also counterspatial traveling UFO's have been recorded resemble a boiling pitch black cloud. There is one specifically that was taken by air and when stabilized the video clearly shows a pitch black boiling cloud traveling along smoothly and silently. Some of the propulsion systems which leave black telltale counterspatial rings hanging in the air which are often called mysterious smoke rings that appear out of no where. There's lots of those shown on social media and usually labeled as a mysterious smoke ring. Tesla had an experience with counterspace that was said have draped the trees and fences and which stuck around for several days. Can't find the source but I'm sure if it's true then it must be know to Tesla fans as this was reported in the local papers of the time.

Although not relevant to this thread, I'd like to quickly mention that Proferrsor Meyl from germany has used roughly the same coil setup to create scalar "waves" (not really waves because there is no frequency):


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tplRbd-fso


The experiment starts at around the 10 minute mark. His transmitter is located above such a coil I think, which is where counterspace or Nigel's point of infinity would be located. In this case, the electric and magnetic transverse waves are 90 degrees out of phase which I believe avoids the constant "collapsing" of the transverse EM, hence no frequency can be measured.

I did not actually know that about Steinmetz working with Tesla's AC generator. Talk about a brilliant group at that period in time. Makes one wonder how much they discovered vs. just re-discovered from much older knowledge, especially considering the main topics of this wonderful site!

Figuring out how mother nature works can surely be done in only one lifetime if corruption is crossed out of the equation of course. We all had minor setbacks because our childhoods had been wasted in school and we have not had the mental education that we would have needed in order to make intelligent decisions. We have to do that ourselves. School will never teach you what is not currently known. The only thing worth learning is mental techniques to more easily find the truth such as deduction and retroduction.

I will be closing my answer now due to time constraints but as a last question: Would you guys be interested in creating a group (chat) to collect general infos on the topic of ethereal mechanics? We can more easily answer each other's questions that way so that we can eventually paint one coherent picture much quicker. I'd like to eventually create one giant thread about that, so that we don't have to discuss these things on threads that are only vaguely related to this topic.

 

[QuakerTheOat]

...

I will be closing my answer now due to time constraints but as a last question: Would you guys be interested in creating a group (chat) to collect general infos on the topic of ethereal mechanics? We can more easily answer each other's questions that way so that we can eventually paint one coherent picture much quicker. I'd like to eventually create one giant thread about that, so that we don't have to discuss these things on threads that are only vaguely related to this topic.

I've subscribed to this thread due to extreme interest, and I'd like to see a group chat of some nature as well. It's imperative to have and to keep this information in more than one place because when topics like this get close to the target, entire websites have a tendency to get shoah'd. Just my .02

 

[3D Printing Bear]

Ok, well I know that one sent you off in to ether, so to return to the topic of counterspace I found this video which gives some visual clues about it, which may help when you encounter it so that you recognize what you're dealing with, demonstrated here by using a Lakhovsky Mulitwave Oscillation Transformer. I believe this was constructed by Eric Dollard and Aaron Murakami. Aaron describes the machine in the first six minutes and then from about 6:30 you get a demonstration using different tubes filled with gases.



The point of this demonstration has to do with recognizing when you're encountering counterspace, which may be important because this may happen while experimenting, and if so this video may help you recognize when you are seeing something which is counterspatially located. It will either be pitch black or shadow like.

This darkness is a distinctive property seen in many UFO's and as dark to pitch black voids, which look like portholes, or the entire base can be pitch black or there can be rings or black banding, and also counterspatial traveling UFO's have been recorded resemble a boiling pitch black cloud. There is one specifically that was taken by air and when stabilized the video clearly shows a pitch black boiling cloud traveling along smoothly and silently. Some of the propulsion systems which leave black telltale counterspatial rings hanging in the air which are often called mysterious smoke rings that appear out of no where. There's lots of those shown on social media and usually labeled as a mysterious smoke ring. Tesla had an experience with counterspace that was said have draped the trees and fences and which stuck around for several days. Can't find the source but I'm sure if it's true then it must be know to Tesla fans as this was reported in the local papers of the time.

​

I actually now live a couple hours away from where the Energy Science Conference goes on each you in Idaho and sadly didn't have the time to go this last year. For a while I followed a lot of John Bedini's work, as well as Tom Bearden and a little bit of Eric Dollard. There's a documentary series that might still be only called 'Energy from the Vacuum' that some of those guys were in, although I have to admit I don't remember hearing or reading about the pitch black boiling cloud/smoke, although it reminds me VERY much of quite a number of demonic manifestations that I've read about in totally different research. I'm not even going to begin to speculate a relation at the moment though. =] I definitely want to look more into that phenomenon; the story of Tesla's experiments are intriguing enough.

When it comes to that "blackness" that shows up when magnetic fields affect light, Nigel has touched on the subject a few times using his visualization method, which is very similar to the Ferrocell that Ken uses but I believe with a few changes. Nigel calls his MHI (Magneto Holographic Imaging) and this is one example of him using it to examine two opposite magnet arrangements and what the fields do to the light. It creates a small black dot that he says is the acceleration to a PIN (point of infinite neutrality), and I wonder if this also relates to the counterspace idea:



BTW that YouTube channel has more of Nigel's videos in one place that any other location. He does have quite a few on LinkedIn as well that I'd like to upload somewhere else for easier access by other people.

The idea here with the demo of counter space is that to my mind it validates what Wheeler said about the magnetic fields black void as a voidance of the dielectric field. So if I can get someone to make one of these batteries and put the ground in that dark space we might be able to validate the idea that ground is counter, or that this dielectric void is counterspatial. So that was the idea behind the video; to think about how to make ground.

If I can get a better idea of what you mean by putting the ground (I assume the negative side) "in that dark space" then I would be MORE than happy to try it and film the process!

Before we move forward, I think we should make sure that we are on the same page on everything. My reply will be further below.
I think we should all state our opinions/knowledge on certain matters to ensure that none of our future discussions generate any noise.
The reason I'm proposing this is because I sometimes feel like we are talking about different things without realizing it.

I will post some statements/questions to which I would like you to give short answers:

Great idea Fexus, the "reply salad" this thread was turning into is not particularly helpful, and this sounds considerably more productive.

Here are my answers FWIW:

1) Do you consider "(a)ether", "counterspace", "dielectric field", "point of infinity" and "dielectric counterspatial medium" to all be different words for the same thing?
> I would say yes, but definitely not with certainty. I haven't researched as much as I'd like to all the various theories describing the nature of matter and our reality (waves/particles) so I feel a little un-learned to have a strong opinion here. I will say, the idea of the foundational substance from which all things derive being a tiny particle or string, makes little sense to me. Hence, some form of "primordial mist or fluid" from which all things are "resonated" into existence I can actually conceive of much easier.

2) What is the ether?
3) Strictly talking, do you consider the ether/the dielectric field to be a fluid?
> I'll attempt answering these together. First I'll re-iterate I need to research and experiment more so take this with a grain of salt: Ether seems to be the "unquantifiable fine superfluid mist" that permeates what we call 'the universe'. If Ken is correct in that essentially all things derive from dielectric inertia and pressure gradients acting against, each other and the surrounding ether, then it would theoretically have fluid-like properties. I don't know if my interpretation what Ken has said is accurate though, and I don't think is or behaves like an endless body of fluid. I do like your rubber band analogy.
Interestingly this sparks my memory of all the ancient creation stories though, which start with the "waters of creation" being beaten back or defeated (or separated in the Bible) before the earth is formed. That paired with NASA saying they supposedly found water in space, there are fluid analogies the do seem to apply to the description of the ether.

4) What is force and what is inertia?
> Torsional physics at the ethereal/dielectric/magnetic field level seems to be (IMO) the foundation for force and inertia. Where that all began is of course the debate of the ages, but it all got "spun up" initially somehow. While I don't believe either of the "Laws" of thermodynamics are in fact actual laws at this point, I do think we observe a "spin slowdown" which scientists have measured and quantified over the centuries, ascribed as the varying decays then defined as laws (understandably I suppose).

5) Is manifestation the result of (a) force?
> I would say so, but one could probably get deep into the full meaning of the word "force" at this level. I may need a better idea of what manifestation you're talking about particularly? I feel like this could get philosophical pretty quickly. =]

I will be closing my answer now due to time constraints but as a last question: Would you guys be interested in creating a group (chat) to collect general infos on the topic of ethereal mechanics? We can more easily answer each other's questions that way so that we can eventually paint one coherent picture much quicker. I'd like to eventually create one giant thread about that, so that we don't have to discuss these things on threads that are only vaguely related to this topic.

I'll try to reply back to the video you also posted, but I need to get back to projects of the day. I do like this idea, and for a platform Telegram would personally work the best if other also have it. I am not on most of the major social platforms like FB, Twitter, Instagram. Regardless of where it ends up it makes sense, as well as starting a new thread dedicated to ether mechanics and similar topics.

 

[Dielectric]

If I can get a better idea of what you mean by putting the ground (I assume the negative side) "in that dark space" then I would be MORE than happy to try it and film the process!

You said you were using your body as ground. Ground is in counterspace. The black void/hole seen using a ferrocell lens is dielectric voidance, is counterspatial, and so I was asking you earlier about this and how you were grounding because you said you were using your body as ground.

Why are you using your body for ground, because traditional ground won't work? That's what I understood. Right or no?
Yes, you are right about me suggesting that you put the ground wire between two magnetic field which are attempting to unite into one.
You wouldn't want the ground wire to be touching anything, but only to be in the middle between two magnets and having the whole as close together as possible without any of them touching each other.

That's only if you are right now being forced to make ground by using your body which I what I understood. This suggestion is a bit of a long shot, not because that space isn't ground, it is ground, but whether it is a good enough is the issue. If it isn't then I will have to think upon this for a while how to multiply the effect.

I am suggesting that as a possible way to find ground in a counterspatial point, what Nigel would have called the the point of infinate neutrality, and that is because I understood that you're having to use your own body as the ground

I've seen a similar video where a PHD in Electrical engineering couldn't figure out why he could not get leds to light up until he himself touched the bloch wall area. It might have been Nigel in the video showing his quantum battery but that was at least 2 years ago so I don't know where that video is located. However I gather this is what the problem is in keeping the Led's running without holding on to them.

When it comes to that "blackness" that shows up when magnetic fields affect light, Nigel has touched on the subject a few times using his visualization method, which is very similar to the Ferrocell that Ken uses but I believe with a few changes. Nigel calls his MHI (Magneto Holographic Imaging) and this is one example of him using it to examine two opposite magnet arrangements and what the fields do to the light. It creates a small black dot that he says is the acceleration to a PIN (point of infinite neutrality), and I wonder if this also relates to the counterspace idea:

Yes, sounds nearly identical, and as I said previously use what you're comfortable with. So if QT is your comfort zone use that but ,yes, gravity is defined in all instances as an acceleration and this is really what Nigel is talking about. Nigel is really talking about what causes gravity.

So to put a point on it, the dielectric accelerates towards a null point in space, which under the Wheeler description is an acceleration towards counter space. A null point, or infinity-neutrality, as Nigel would have it, can be created by using two magnets. Magnets do not attract, they accelerate towards this infinity neutral point, which is a null point that is forming between the two magnets as their fields seek to join together to form the incommensurability of the magnetic field. By incommensurable is to say the un-dividable, because we all know you cannot divide a magnet in to separate poles, and hence a magnetic field incommensurability.

If I wasn't a thousand years old I'd dig up this fantastic link to the evolution of critters like dino's and the expand'0 planet, and which has to do with the Earth being essentially hollow, and which then links to the Karl Schappeller device, which was a probable model of the planet that we know was real and worked, and so this becomes self validating because in the Schappeller device the machine uses 2 magnets to form two poles with a hollow void between them, thus opening the counter-spatial null point which is the PIN Point of Infinite Neutrality just as Nigel has said it is. I see no significant difference. The understandings of Wheeler and Nigel are in agreement.

Also worth noting here that the most secret part to the Karl Schappeller device was how it was grounded.

Alright folks, sorry I didn't reply over the weekend. After replying to the latest comments, I will be going into the sources that have been posted here. Primarily Nigel's book (and comparing it to Ken's). So there will be some radio silence from my side for a couple days.

I feel like a Galápagos tortoise I'm so slow moving, but I think though I have enough stuff now to make the battery, and so I'm sort of out of excuses for being behind, well truthfully I'm only behind if you're younger than 70 so maybe I'm ahead.

John Bedini's work, as well as Tom Bearden and a little bit of Eric Dollard.

The late John Bedini was a pioneer but now with Wheeler and Nigel I think much of the mystery is falling in to place. Bearden seems to be suspect in the eyes of people like Aaron Murakami, and I know Aaron has worked with Eric Dollard as can be seen in his videos. I think Dollard, Wheeler, and Nigel here are probably people whom are on the cutting edge.

 

[3D Printing Bear]

A random update with the results of my material processing for larger QBs. Nigel had me play around orientation of each layer, hence the markings on the pieces. With the right layers & orientation I can get 1.8V from a single cell, although the voltage per cell drops as you stack them up. I'm still learning what affects that and how to maintain a higher voltage.

 

[Dielectric]

What is your reason for assuming that a slowing down of the dielectric is what causes magnetism? Seems a little counter-intuitive to me. I thought a speeding up would be more plausible. If ether/counterspace/the dielectric field is synonymous with rest, then it shouldn't move at all, no? After all, since space does not exist in counterspace, there can't be any movement in it either. Only through a disturbance of the ether does it "speed up" and turn into a discharge into space. Ken does indeed say that magnetism creates mass and volume, but he also said that a black hole is a supermass where "dielectricity has overthrown magnetisms ability to keep the mass within the visible/spatial universe" which would imply that it is possible to bring masses into counterspace by means of amplified dielectricity.

* Note here; old boy shouldn't be typing as he is very tired and so this maybe incoherent and crazy as hell but seems perfectly logical at the moment.

Yes, well I can understand why you would think that, and you're not alone in thinking about it that way, but Wheeler is whom I am parroting here.

Ken is the one who say's that the slowing down of the dielectric plane creates magnetism. I believe Ken is saying this because if the field is slowed down it self assembles in to ropes or tunnels if you will, and thus forms the magnetic field we all know as magnetic lines of force. Otherwise it seems to be an in-coherent static dielectric field which is all around us at all times.

Space, hence distance, is a creation of magnetism because matter cannot exist as a coherent stable form without magnetism, and since we (*you actually) have defined an atom as a model of a magnetic torus field, and which is itself created from an apparently incorporeal material transmutating itself via a rotational vortex tunnel and in to matter as micro model of a magnet, your insight btw, which I'm about 99% sure is accurate, is that an atom is a model of a magnet and as that model then is supported by the solitron vortex connection it does seem to me to logical and likely to be correct. What these vortices are made from is what I'm asking myself; like are they dielectric vortices coming into our space as coherent threads of the otherwise counter-spatially located dielectric field?

Maybe we/I have this wrong but It would seem that is the case but in any event they aren't physical but rather incorporeal, which is a term I prefer over metaphysical which refers more to the manifestation of objects and intellect via an incorporeal materium.

Falaco Solitons
http://coll.pair.com/csdc/pdf/fal10305.pdf
http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/zeromean.pdf

Short hand translation: All this spinning, twisting and turning crap has got to slow ya down.

However, I know that's not what you meant, so is the dielectric counterspatial field moving? Not entirely clear as of yet, but consider that the dielectric is essentially incoherent magnetism which then makes everything else move by pressure mediation. Especially liquids.

See here now, the theoretically smallest particle (Planuck scale: The Planck length is the smallest distance/scale we can probe with accelerators) and the shape of this theoretical particle just happens to be a tetrahedron. Now look at Star War's and the Star Destroyer's specifically. Now look at some other images of supposedly alien UFO's that also just happen to be tetrahedronal, not triangular per say, which is related and workable, but sharply pointed and elongated tetrahedrons.

Why is this, and why triangles and tetrahedrons, and why is Water a dielectric receiver? Water works on what principle? Pressure mediation right? The ether is a pressure field. It's a dielectric pressure field. I invented a little tiny toy experiment to prove out this concept using magnetic pressure and tetrahedrons running on a paper guide tent and made from assorted materials to test cause and effect.
https://i.postimg.cc/pX8vFyN4/Graphite-Glider-A.jpg

Water forms a liquid crystal which is acted upon by this pressure field in the same manner. A tetrahedronal shaped vehicle entering the dielectric counter-spatial field would/could then be propelled by that field just as the experimental magnetic pressured propelled a toy tetrahedron. Though it certainly need not enter that field to be a hyper velocity silent vehicle that defies gravity.

In Video 1 of Wheelers' Uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism is the critical but little appreciated demonstration of the effects of accelerating a magnet to speed up the dielectric accretion disk of a magnet and thus increase it's effect upon surround space as the dielectric is take in to the magnetic.

This idea about energy being at it's lowest state in a super cooled condition is probably misses the point of being in a super cooled state, whereas in that condition energy can be condensed, which is another way of saying put compacted and under pressure. Now going back to the quote from the holographic blogspot, it states that by using super fluids researchers have replicated hidden accretion disk's.

I claimed that in galactic jets the accretion disks were operating in counterspace because they are invisible and yet here in this research they say that by using super-fluids, researchers were able to produce these same hidden accretion disks. Translate that backwards and you have them using super-fluids to access what apparently transfer power via the physical superfluid to our reality.

Inertia (under classical physics) would be defined as energy. Usually one might think of inertia as something moving. Now you know how an automatic transmission works is by flinging oil on to a turbine. Sort of a primitive form of inductive propulsion but done by fluid transfer. Actually such a concept seems totally insane and yet today there are almost no manual transmissions in cars. Today's incompetent car thieves can't even steal cars that have manual transmissions by enlarge; such has been the success of flinging hot oil on to a turbine.

Is that what is going on? Something similar? No, and that is because the particles that make up matter begin with the shape of a tetrahedron, which then forms a pyramid, which then forms, ect, ect, ect: The so called sacred geometry of crystalline patterns contained in platonic solids is a reflection of some ancient understanding of all this interaction with some kind of incorporeal pressure field that acts upon these shapes to the best advantage.


"1) Do you consider "(a)ether", "counterspace", "dielectric field", "point of infinity" and "dielectric counterspatial medium" to all be different words for the same thing?"
Yes~ One and the same thing.

 

[Fexus]

A random update with the results of my material processing for larger QBs. Nigel had me play around orientation of each layer, hence the markings on the pieces. With the right layers & orientation I can get 1.8V from a single cell, although the voltage per cell drops as you stack them up. I'm still learning what affects that and how to maintain a higher voltage.

View attachment 21010​

I finally got around to order your recommended materials except for the magnets because I have a lot of them already. I had built this battery before but it didn't work. I used zinc (not sure about any specifics), wet paper and just some euro cent coins which are like 89% copper (maybe that was the problem): Free Energy Devices - Patrick Kelly.
So here are some questions regarding the battery:

- Does the strength/size of the magnets matter?
- May I ask why you're using zinc strips? It probably has to do with the 90° you mentioned but have you found a difference in effect? Why not cut it out like the rest of the materials?
- Does the orientation of the poles matter?

I've subscribed to this thread due to extreme interest, and I'd like to see a group chat of some nature as well. It's imperative to have and to keep this information in more than one place because when topics like this get close to the target, entire websites have a tendency to get shoah'd. Just my .02

You're more than welcome to join the discussion as well if you have anything to add or feel like we are spouting nonsense. I think Dielectric and I kinda "hijacked" this thread... ^^

I'll try to reply back to the video you also posted, but I need to get back to projects of the day. I do like this idea, and for a platform Telegram would personally work the best if other also have it. I am not on most of the major social platforms like FB, Twitter, Instagram. Regardless of where it ends up it makes sense, as well as starting a new thread dedicated to ether mechanics and similar topics.

As for the group chat, I would like to take advantage of the tools that the good admins of sh have offered us (nothing against a telegram group as well though. I have it too). Those tools would be CryptPad and Element. Element will be used for the discussion group chat and CryptPad for storing information in a coherent manner. They can be accessed via "chat.unmute.tv" (Element) and "pad.stolenhistory.net" (CryptPad). Element has a mobile app version as well which is pretty convenient. Just message me on Element when you have set it up and I will invite you to the group, since public rooms don't seem to be allowed on the sh server. Please don't be afraid to join in even if it's just for lurking! We will discuss the cryptpad stuff when everyone is ready.

 

[3D Printing Bear]

I finally got around to order your recommended materials except for the magnets because I have a lot of them already. I had built this battery before but it didn't work. I used zinc (not sure about any specifics), wet paper and just some euro cent coins which are like 89% copper (maybe that was the problem): Free Energy Devices - Patrick Kelly.

Awesome! I imagine having actual copper foil will make the difference when you try it this time. My guess is the euro coins were possibly too thick and alloyed with another metal that "deadened" the effect.

So here are some questions regarding the battery:

- Does the strength/size of the magnets matter?
> From what I understand the higher the N-rating the stronger the effect and the greater amount of voltage. I try to go with N52s but have gotten it to work with N45s. In terms of size, it does not seem to matter, although the thinner the magnets the more you can physically stack up in a given space, giving you more energy per cubic mm/inch. I've built batteries with 3/8" (~10mm) and 3/16" (~5mm) diameter by 1/32" (0.75mm) thick disc magnets and the voltage was not a great deal less using the 3/16" size, although very difficult to work with. Lately I've built them using square 1/4" x 1/4" x 1/32" (6 x 6 x 0.75mm) magnets for easy of cutting and orienting materials. I also don't know of any tiny square batteries in order to avoid claims I'm "cheating" somehow.

- May I ask why you're using zinc strips? It probably has to do with the 90° you mentioned but have you found a difference in effect? Why not cut it out like the rest of the materials?
> Actually the zinc is still a disc, the magnesium is a strip/ribbon piece, and that is for no other reason than 1/8" wide ribbon being the most readily available and cheapest form of magnesium. I'm using it because in the original QB build video description I read that water with 5 -10% magnesium in it. I had no magnesium to dissolve in water but I did have the ribbon and just decided to try it. I'm still impressed by how much it boosts the voltage, easily ~30 - 60% increase that I've seen. Aluminum is the next most reactive material and does seem to work as a magnesium replacement but I need to test it more, but worth a try if you have no magnesium.

- Does the orientation of the poles matter?
> Yes indeed, I found facing the north pole to the copper (or pyrolytic graphite) layer was optimal, meaning the zinc would face the south pole. Now which way each metal is flipped will also make a difference so I would test that. Also my best results were when the zinc is 90 degrees to the copper.


I just got new metal foils in the mail yesterday to also test with: titanium, brass, and iron. Nickle is shipped and arriving soon. =]

As for the group chat, I would like to take advantage of the tools that the good admins of sh have offered us (nothing against a telegram group as well though. I have it too). Those tools would be CryptPad and Element. Element will be used for the discussion group chat and CryptPad for storing information in a coherent manner. They can be accessed via "chat.unmute.tv" (Element) and "pad.stolenhistory.net" (CryptPad). Element has a mobile app version as well which is pretty convenient. Just message me on Element when you have set it up and I will invite you to the group, since public rooms don't seem to be allowed on the sh server. Please don't be afraid to join in even if it's just for lurking! We will discuss the cryptpad stuff when everyone is ready.

This sounds good to me! I'll go check them out today or tomorrow and get joined in, thanks. =]

 

[Dielectric]

May I ask why you're using zinc strips? It probably has to do with the 90° you mentioned but have you found a difference in effect? Why not cut it out like the rest of the materials?
> Actually the zinc is still a disc, the magnesium is a strip/ribbon piece, and that is for no other reason than 1/8" wide ribbon being the most readily available and cheapest form of magnesium. I'm using it because in the original QB build video description I read that water with 5 -10% magnesium in it. I had no magnesium to dissolve in water but I did have the ribbon and just decided to try it. I'm still impressed by how much it boosts the voltage, easily ~30 - 60% increase that I've seen. Aluminum is the next most reactive material and does seem to work as a magnesium replacement but I need to test it more, but worth a try if you have no magnesium.

I think we could start with considering that the resultant electric production is produced through a magnetic pressure field and which is applied by the magnets. I think that the pressure field is created by a null point opening a vortex hole to a counter spatial dielectric field. Think of a hole in a hose spewing fluid out.

So if we begin with understanding that electricity is the magnetic under stress, either compression or elastic, then it should be the geometry of crystalline structure which determines the resultant effects. In this case it would make sense that the orientation of the materials atomic crystalline makeup is critical to the subsequent result, and because it is in some way interacting with the pressure field to re-orient it; such as to induce either compression or elastisity (stretching) of the magnetic field. So I think we can figure that the outcome of Nigel's battery is the product of magnetic pressure producing gradients because the materials being employed are interacting with the magnetic pressure such as to manipulate it in to the aforementioned stetching and compression, and we know that magnetic pressure is at the core of the production of electricity because electricity is magnetism under stress; either compression or elastic stretching.

That's one line of thinking but here's another, and being males we are prone to singular vision, so as to not become tunnel vision locked what I think is that we could recall Wheeler's mantra that everything is all one thing, just as water, ice, and steam are all one thing.

Now this is very interesting and it's brief so take a minute to read it over: It reminds me of spintronics and has some really interesting things to say in two paragraphs, which is the whole article.
It is called; "Seismic Wave Propagation Using Micropolar Theory."
micropolarmedia
Additional gobbilty goop; https://www.brown.edu/Conference/ses2013/Program/Abstracts/paper221.htm

The study and classification of crystals wasn't undertaken until the 1960's. This is not an ancient field of inquiry but it has since taken on an apparent importance. 1 SOLIDS can be divided into two catagories.  Crystalline  Amorphous Crystalline has long range order Amorphous materials have short range order Effect - [PPT Powerpoint]
Zinc, Wurtzite, & Perovskite
Figure 2.6: Different crystal structures of QDs. (Left) zinc blende...

 

[Fexus]

I've seen a similar video where a PHD in Electrical engineering couldn't figure out why he could not get leds to light up until he himself touched the bloch wall area. It might have been Nigel in the video showing his quantum battery but that was at least 2 years ago so I don't know where that video is located. However I gather this is what the problem is in keeping the Led's running without holding on to them.

I think I found the video you mean:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu7JjnvW66o


and here is an older post of yours where you talked about it already (sorry for the stalking):
SH Archive - The missing link to ancient power

 

[Dielectric]

Yes, and thank you for locating that, and amazingly it is Nigel Cheese.
So that's where the damn thing was located. You know how many times I've tried to find that video.
Someone posted that video of Nigel's in a thread on the McCandlish ARV in an UFO forum. That's where I first saw it.
I'm almost scared to look to see what I said back them. I certainly didn't understand what I do now but I took a quick
scan, it's all I dared to do, and fortunately it's not too far out of line with where I am now.
Wow.. thanks so much for locating that.
That's a great video as well.

 

[3D Printing Bear]

Yes, and thank you for locating that, and amazingly it is Nigel Cheese.
So that's where the damn thing was located. You know how many times I've tried to find that video.
Someone posted that video of Nigel's in a thread on the McCandlish ARV in an UFO forum. That's where I first saw it.
I'm almost scared to look to see what I said back them. I certainly didn't understand what I do now but I took a quick
scan, it's all I dared to do, and fortunately it's not too far out of line with where I am now.
Wow.. thanks so much for locating that.
That's a great video as well.

I'm just catching up on the thread in the middle of the night here, but if you, Fexus, or anyone else are looking for a particular video of Nigel's I probably have it downloaded or know where it is on YT. The channel Fexus linked to has by far the most.

Did mention I probably have some legit OCD...? =]