Flat Earth

[luddite]

Thanks for the help. I have a basic understanding of how the globe and reality works, but I was trying to see if people can explain some basic beliefs they have about the moon.

Please explain

1. how a orbital body can be tidally locked when all other alleged planets rotate.
2. how someone in Brazil and Finland can both see the moon at the same time - directly above! 1 in daytime and 1 in nightime.
3. If your answer contains "curved light" due to gravity from something then please demonstrate this close to the earth with a lazer.

 

[sandokhan]

Double forces of attractive gravitation paradox:

https://stolenhistory.net/threads/flat-earth.3724/page-7#post-35779

 

[luddite]

moon is tidally locked by the Earth because Earth's gravity is stronger than the moon's and the fact that the moon is close to Earth compared to the rest of the solar system.

Gravity attracts. It never stops. If what you say is correct then the strength of earth's gravity would, over time and in concert with the moons strong gravity, collide them together.

self-illuminated why does it go through phases and sometimes go completely dark.

There is no use trying to understand that which is not controlled by us.

Liedar I find it foolish that someone trying to hide something would throw out a clue to the people its trying to hide it from

Foolish? The lie remains a truth for many. I would say it is wise not foolish.

 

[Jd755]

I have no idea why people who claim to understand the ball shape theory bother with any theory that counters their knowing. I have no idea what shape the earth has or if it has one or if it needs to have one.
There is a second elephant in the room in regards the globe theory and from a stolen history angle that doesn't require anyone to look at the ceiling in a vain effort to come to know what they are standing on.
Every built structure I have looked into is built to Euclidean geometry. Ignoring whoever is attributed by a manufactured historical record as the builder of these structures and the manufactured range of 'civilisations' and 'times' they get attributed to but instead doing something practical like visiting them, walking on them, in them, around them or if that is beyond people and sadly it seems google earth and google youtube are favoured by many as credible sources, then go to the holiday picture sites like tripadvisor and travel blogs. The latter sources are way more trustworthy than anything googles people control simply because people with cameras are doing the wandering.

Every structure is built to the level and the plumb. If you do not see how this singular demonstrable, checkable practical repeatable fact all by itself blows the illusion of ball theory out of your conscious attention then I don't know what will.
So there are two proofs of a level plane.
Contained water always presents a level surface.
All built structures of whatever historical age are built to Euclidean geometry which only works on the level plane.

These are not proofs in my opinion, they are proofs that anyone, literally anyone can check out for themselves by devising any experience and or experiments they care to dream up

 

[luddite]

It's easy to build on a flat surface of a curved object if the area being smoothed down to be level is very small compared to the size of the globe.

Here's one question I have for flat earthers.

In reality the Tropic of Capricorn's distance is 36,788 km (22,859 mi). On the flat Earth the distance is claimed to be greater. What is it's distance?

You just keep introducing new questions that highlight a basic understanding of a broken model. It gets refuted and you introduce another one. I think you are trolling.

The answer is infinite. A circle never ends.

 

[Jd755]

It's easy to build on a flat surface of a curved object if the area being smoothed down to be level is very small compared to the size of the globe.

A curved surface no matter how big is never level.
A curved surface of a ball is falling away in every single direction from your point of standing.
I get the impression you are not here to investigate anything or further your understanding of the ball earth theory.

 

[sandokhan]

gravity would pull them together

Are you saying that gravity is attractive?

By all means, explain the mechanism. Use general relativity, quantum field theory, whatever is necessary.

What is the attractive mechanism? How do two gravitons attract each other? How does lake Ontario (as an example) remain fixed on the outer surface of a sphere?

If you do not have a mechanism, you have nothing at all.

You have a graviton emitted by the water molecules of lake Ontario. You have a graviton released by the iron/nickel core of the Earth. How do they attract each other so as to constitute a gravitational pulling force?

 

[sandokhan]

but Einstein's explanation of matter pulling itself together through space/time is what causes it

No.

Einstein never explained how matter affects spacetime.

Dr. Erik Verlinde:

"General Relativity remains just a description of the force we call gravity. It leaves unanswered the key question of exactly how matter affects space and time."


Since general relativity is of no help, all physicists must come back to the gravitons (which, incidentally, have been discovered).

Here are the issues facing you.

Please explain how a graviton emitted by a single molecule of water is attracted by a single graviton released by the iron/nickel core.

Have you ever thought about the enormity of this problem?

You have two choices to start with: either gravitons are being emitted continuously by the core, or they were emitted only once as soon as the atoms of iron were created in the stars. If I were to press the matter further and have you explain the origin of the atoms of iron, you'd be left speechless, since you cannot explain the helium gap paradox.

The first option means that there is a continuous loss of mass, not only by the core itself, but by each and every object/body on the surface of the Earth. The second option means you have to explain the incredible stability of these gravitons: five billion years with no loss of energy whatsoever.

Then, you have to explain how those gravitons emitted by the core reach the surface.

It doesn't take long to infer that there must be two kinds of gravitons: an emitting graviton, and a absorbing graviton (one has a vortex which releases energy, the other one has a vortex which receives this energy).

That is, an object on the surface will have to emit gravitons as well as to absorb them: two kinds of particles, with emissive and receptive vortices.

Now, you must explain the nature of these streams/strings of gravitons.

Are these streams fixed or do they move along with the object on the surface of the Earth? Newton's law of gravitation says nothing about density: how would the iron/nickel core know how to release more gravitons if you are standing on top of a mountain, or if you climb on top of something else? You are walking on the surface, the strings of gravitons move along with you. Now, you climb on top of a tank. Due to the density of the materials used for the tank, not as many gravitons will reach you as before. How does the iron/nickel core know how to release more gravitons depending on your whereabouts? Therefore, the streams must be fixed. Then you have a huge problem. These gravitons must reach each and every cell of the body, the blood vessels, everything. Think about it. Since the streams of gravitons are fixed now, it means you will slide along the surface, and have your gravitons being removed from the previous position, while they have to attach themselves to the streams of gravitons to be found in your new position in space. You also have fixed streams of gravitons. How do these wonderful streams/strings of gravitons detach themselves and then assemble together as if nothing happened?

And these are just the start of your woes. Now you have to explain the actual quantum mechanism: what is the nature of the energy which propagates through these graviton vortices?

 

[luddite]

And these are just the start of your woes. Now you have to explain the actual quantum mechanism: what is the nature of the energy which propagates through these graviton vortices?

Stunning and clear! I learnt something there and thank you for that @sandokhan

 

[wise]

Nice to see that Sandokhan teached something. Because, learning something from Sandokhan is more and more harder than understanding the Aether.

Hello everybody. I need to read very things here first, before understanding whats going on here right now.

 

[Jd755]

I have a good basic understanding of the globe and reality,

Globe and reality, now.

My simple question still stands, how well do you understand the Flat Earth?

Please share your basic understanding of the globe and if it is relevant to this thread your reality.

the gravitons (which, incidentally, have been discovered).

When, where, how?
https://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/archive/archive_2012/today12-10-19_NutshellReadMore.html

 

[sandokhan]

Gravitons are a hypothesis

Not anymore.

Gravitons = preons = dextrorotatory subquarks

Antigravitons = laevorotatory subquarks = tachyons

‘Science’ magazine in February 1996 reported – American researchers have said, they found that collisions between quarks in a particle accelerator were unexpectedly violent. William Carithers, of Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, in Batavia, Illinois, told ‘Science’: “This is just the sort of effect you would see if quarks were not fundamental particles, but had some sort of internal structure.”

Chris Hill, theorist at Fermilab, indicated the view in “New Scientist” | 11 May 1996 | page 29 | “It would suggest that whatever lies inside the quarks is incredibly tightly bound, in a way that theory can’t yet accommodate.” On the 1st March 1997 – in an article in ‘New Scientist’ on page 14 – results from DESY, the German Electron Synchrotron pointed to the existence of what is described as a “leptoquark”. Robin Marshall of the University of Manchester, who was involved in the work, said “The leptoquark is a bizarre object that we don’t understand completely”. Researchers said this “could mean that quarks and leptons are not fundamental particles after all, but are made up of even smaller particles”.

https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.R2521


Has the substructure of quarks been found by the Collider Detector at Fermilab?

Keiichi Akama and Hidezumi Terazawa

Phys. Rev. D 55, R2521(R) – Published 1 March 1997



https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9608279.pdf


http://web.ihep.su/library/pubs/tconf99/ps/teraz.pdf


https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9608279.pdf

You have to explain the significant excess of jet transverse energies which indicate the quark substructure.



One of the authors (H.T.) also wishes to thank Professor Stanley J. Brodsky and all the other staff members, especially Professors James D. Bjorken and Michael Peskin, of Theoretical Physics Group at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University not only for their useful discussions on the substructure of quarks but also for their warm hospitalities extended to him during his visit in July, 1996 when this work was completed.

Imagine this: the best quantum physicists in the world, at Stanford and at Fermilab, already have a clear idea of the substructure of quarks.



The Nobel Prize in Physics 1998 (discovery of preons, fractional charges of electrons)



PREONS ARE SUBQUARKS!



https://books.google.ro/books?id=Q8...wQAQ#v=onepage&q=preons are subquarks&f=false


https://books.google.ro/books?id=Yf...kQAQ#v=onepage&q=preons are subquarks&f=false


https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/preons-and-subquarks.945976/


From 1979:



Subquark Model of Leptons and Quarks



https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/11/554/11554108.pdf


page 2: preons or subquarks



Splitting the electron, by B. Daviss, New Scientist, 31 January 1998, p. 36.



Fractionally charged quasiparticles signal their presence with noise, by G. P. Collins, Physics Today, November 1997, p. 17.



"In 1995, the fractional charge of Laughlin quasiparticles was measured directly in a quantum antidot electrometer at Stony Brook University, New York.



In 1997, two groups of physicists at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, and at the Commissariat à l’énergie atomique laboratory near Paris, detected such quasiparticles carrying an electric current, through measuring quantum shot noise."



J. Martin; S. Ilani; B. Verdene; J. Smet; V. Umansky; D. Mahalu; D. Schuh; G. Abstreiter; A. Yacoby (2004). “Localization of Fractionally Charged Quasi Particles”.



Now, the proof from mathematics, that gravitons/antigravitons (subquarks) must exist, using knot theory:



https://cds.cern.ch/record/223258/files/9202054.pdf


Gravitons and Loops



Abhay Ashtekar, Carlo Rovelli and Lee Smolin

The “reality conditions” are realized by an inner product that is chiral asymmetric, resulting in a chiral asymmetric ordering for the Hamiltonian, and, in an asymmetric description of the left and right handed gravitons.



The first step towards this goal is to recast the Fock description of graviton also in terms of closed loops.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1010.3552.pdf


Chiral vacuum fluctuations in quantum gravity

Is made up of the right handed positive frequency of the graviton and the left handed negative frequency of the anti-graviton.

https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/13/643/13643701.pdf


Subquarks-Possibly the Most Fundamental Form of Matter



A model of “subquark pregeometry” in which the graviton is also a composite of a subquark-antisubquark pair: Einstein’s gravity is a quantum effect of matter.



Everything is made of subquarks and every force is due to them.



https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article/64/4/1494/1924776


Magnetic Moments of Composite Leptons and Quarks in a Dynamical Subquark Model



J. Martin; S. Ilani; B. Verdene; J. Smet; V. Umansky; D. Mahalu; D. Schuh; G. Abstreiter; A. Yacoby (2004). “Localization of Fractionally Charged Quasi Particles”.



https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15310895/

An outstanding question pertaining to the microscopic properties of the fractional quantum Hall effect is understanding the nature of the particles that participate in the localization but that do not contribute to electronic transport. By using a scanning single electron transistor, we imaged the individual localized states in the fractional quantum Hall regime and determined the charge of the localizing particles. Highlighting the symmetry between filling factors 1/3 and 2/3, our measurements show that quasi-particles with fractional charge e* = e/3 localize in space to submicrometer dimensions, where e is the electron charge.

http://yacoby.physics.harvard.edu/P...Fractionally Charged Quasi Particles_2004.pdf

Our results constitute direct evidence that quasi-particles with charge e/3 localize at

1/3 and 2/3. Moreover, our results highlight the symmetry between filling factors 1/3 and 2/3, indicating directly that at 2/3 the quasiparticle charge is e/3.



One can clearly see that the step height in the fractional regime is only about 1/3

of the step height in the integer regime, confirming the localization of quasi-particles with e* e/3 for both 1/3 and 2/3.



“Quasiparticle, in physics, a disturbance, in a medium, that behaves as a particle and that may conveniently be regarded as one. ”

“This “electron with a different mass” is called an “electron quasiparticle”.”



It is much easier to access the preons in an electron, than it would be to try the same thing using quarks (protons).



I was able to retrieve the ORIGINAL PAPER PUBLISHED BY FERMILAB IN 1996!



https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ex/9601008.pdf


No single experimental source of systematic uncertainty can account for the high-ET excess.



The presence of quark substructure could appear as an enhancement of the cross section at high ET .

Above 200 GeV, the jet cross section is significantly higher than the NLO predictions. The data over the full ET range are very precise. They provide powerful constraints on QCD, and demand a reevaluation of theoretical predictions and uncertainties within and beyond the Standard Model.

https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2018/conf/fermilab-conf-18-587-cms.pdf


From Fermilab no less!



Tachyons as Dark Energy Quanta

An electrically-charged tachyon would emit Cherenkov radiation in a vacuum, lose energy and speed up. A tachyon with any value of Γ could be produced with negligible energy, eithersingly in multiparticle production or in pairs if needed to conserve momentum. Any tachyon with weak charge, with any coupling to the Z and/or W-bosons, would be pair-produced e.g. at LEP, spoiling its many precision tests of the Standard Model.

One of the greatest quantum physicists in the world, Dr. Robert Ehrlich, has published several papers on the discovery of tachyons.



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.00488.pdf


https://arxiv.org/pdf/1408.2804.pdf


https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.09897.pdf


Dr. Robert Ehrlich



Emeritus Physics professor at George Mason University



Ph.D. in physics from Columbia University in 1964 under then future Nobel Laureate Jack Steinberger



Contrary to the belief held by most physicists, a considerable amount of evidence has, in fact, been amassed prior to the KATRIN experiment that one of the neutrinos is a tachyon.



Dr. Robert Ehrlich, PhD Columbia University, worked on the Nobel prize winning experiment “two neutrino” experiment:



https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1988/illpres/hunt.html


KK particle is a tachyon.



https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0607246.pdf


https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1998/press-release/


13 October 1998



The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has awarded the 1998 Nobel Prize in Physics jointly to



Professor Robert B. Laughlin, Stanford University, California, USA,



Professor Horst L. Störmer, Columbia University, New York and Lucent Technologies’ Bell Labs, New Jersey, USA, and



Professor Daniel C. Tsui, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.



The three researchers are being awarded the Nobel Prize for discovering that electrons acting together in strong magnetic fields can form new types of “particles”, with charges that are fractions of electron charges.



Preon-quarkel structure of the electrons:



http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=quarter-electrons-may-enable-quantum-computer

Every science student is taught that the indivisible unit of charge is that of the electron. But 2 years ago, scientists found that charge sometimes shatters into “quasi-particles” that have one-third the fundamental charge. And in this week’s issue of Nature, researchers announce they have spotted one-fifth-charge quasi-particles–a decisive finding suggesting that its time to change any physics textbooks still claiming that electron charge is indivisible.

https://web.archive.org/web/20130621182913/http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/1999/05/19-01.html


More references on preons/particles with fractional charges.



http://sites.science.oregonstate.edu/~ostroveo/COURSES/ph673/Notes/FractionalCharge.pdf


The fractional QHE describes the plateaus where 4is a fraction, the most prominent

occuring at v = 1/3

Tsui, Stormer and Gossard, 1982



Understanding the FQHE requires a radically-new theory. You end up with

fractionally-charged quasiparticles which have been observed!



Quasiparticles have charge v 1/3!!



The fractional charge of the quasiparticle has been checked directly by several clever

experiments.

Goldman and Su, 1995; Saminadayar et al, 1997; de Picciotto et al, 1997



https://phys.org/news/2014-12-electrons-evidence-exotic-behaviors.html


How electrons split: New evidence of exotic behaviors



https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3172


Our results establish the existence of fractional quasiparticles in the high-energy spectrum of a quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnet.



https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/electron-splits-into-quasiparticles/


In 1996, physicists split an electron into a holon and spinon. Now, van den Brink and his colleagues have broken an electron into an orbiton and a spinon, as reported in Nature today.



https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg15721195-400-splitting-the-electron/

But that pillar seems to be crumbling. Scientists have pushed open a window onto an unexpected world of quantum strangeness in which the electron’s “indivisible” unit of charge can be carved up to make particles carrying one-third or one-fifth of a unit, or even fractions far smaller.

Gertsenshtein-Zeldovich effect

The transformation of an electromagnetic wave into a gravitational wave when the electromagnetic wave propagates through a constant transverse magnetic field.



Inverse GZ effect: the birth of an electromagnetic field under the action of metric perturbation (equivalent of GW action) in the strong magnetic field.



The generated EM wave is a second-order effect (proportional to the square of the amplitude of the GW).





Wave resonance of light and gravitational waves



http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_014_01_0084.pdf




Electromagnetic and gravitational waves in a stationary magnetic field



http://jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_038_04_0652.pdf




Gravitational Hertz experiment with electromagnetic radiation in a strong magnetic field



https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1504/1504.06548.pdf




“Since it has definite energy, the gravitational wave is itself is the source of some additional gravitational field (static g-field). Like the energy producing it, this field is a second-order effect in the h(ik). But in the case of high-frequency gravitational waves the effect is significantly strengthened: the fact that the pseudotensor t^(ik) is quadratic in the derivatives of the hik introduces the large factor λ^(-2). In such a case we may say that the wave itself produces the background field (static g-field) on which it propagates. This [static g] field is conveniently treated by carrying out the averaging described above over regions of four-space with dimensions large compared to λ. Such an averaging smooths out the short-wave “ripple” and leaves the slowly varying background metric (static g-field).”



Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M. (1975), The Classical Theory of Fields





Field Equations in the Complex Quaternion Spaces



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.06182.pdf




Light passing through a strong magnetic field will produce a gravitational wave via wave resonance.

"EM photons having the same frequency and direction as the GWs and suitable phase matching as the GWs, interact directly with GWs in a magnetic field and produce “detection” EM photons that signal the presence of relic HFGWs (high frequency gravitational waves).



The number of EM photons is proportional to the amplitude of the relic HFGWs, A ≈ 10-30, not the square, so that it would be necessary to accumulate such EM photons for only about 1000 seconds in order to achieve relic HFGW detection.



It utilizes a synchro-resonance EM beam to create a very significant EM signal that propagates not in the direction of the synchro-resonance EM beam and the GW proportional to the amplitude of the GW squared, but perpendicular to both the magnetic field and the GW/EM beam directions.

It is a first-order perturbative photon flux (PPF), proportional to A, not A2."





Perturbative Photon Fluxes Generated by High-Frequency Gravitational Waves and Their Physical Effects



http://www.drrobertbaker.com/docs/Li-Baker 6-22-08.pdf (it includes the peer review data)





Signal Photon Flux and Background Noise in a Coupling Electromagnetic Detecting System for High Frequency Gravitational Waves



http://www.gravwave.com/docs/Li, et al. PRD 09-9-09 .pdf




A New Theoretical Technique for the Measurement of High-Frequency Relic Gravitational Waves



https://www.researchgate.net/public...t_of_High-Frequency_Relic_Gravitational_Waves


http://www.gravwave.com/docs/J. of Mod. Phys 2011.pdf




Searching for high-frequency gravitational waves by ground high field magnetic resonant sweepings



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.06251.pdf




Ultra-High-Intensity Lasers for Gravitational Wave Generation and Detection



http://www.drrobertbaker.com/docs/AIP; HFGW Laser Generator.pdf




Why LIGO can’t detect HFGWs



http://www.gravwave.com/docs/Why LIGO can't detect HFGWs.pdf




Tesla used gravitational waves (telluric waves) to send signals/information without any cables/wires ("true wireless").



The Value Estimation of an HFGW Frequency Time Standard for Telecommunications Network Optimization



http://www.gravwave.com/docs/AIP; HFGW Telecommunications.pdf




The Utilization of High-Frequency Gravitational Waves for Global Communications



http://www.iiisci.org/Journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/HDM219WH.pdf




High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Induced Nuclear Fusion



http://www.gravwave.com/docs/AIP; HFGW Nuclear Fusion.pdf




http://www.gravwave.com/index_2.html


http://www.gravwave.com/chi_joint_project.htm




GASER: Gravitational-wave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation



https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0410/0410022.pdf




The Gertsenshtein-Zel'dovich effect can be used to create electron-positron pairs torsion fields (dextrorotatory subquarks-laevorotatory subquarks) out of the ether wave lattice. This torsion field will then act as a shield against the normal flow/propagation of ether waves (gravitational and electromagnetic), forming an invisible ball lightning sphere around the spacecraft.



https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en


Craft using an inertial mass reduction device



https://patents.google.com/patent/US20180229864A1/en


High Frequency Gravitational Wave Generator



Dr. Salvatore Cezar Pais

Naval Air War Center Aircraft Division



Both patents are very well written and documented (rivalising with the best patents published by N. Tesla or by T. Townsend Brown).



https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJSPACESE.2015.075910


https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2017-01-2040/




http://www.drrobertbaker.com/docs/Aerospace HFGW Applications.pdf


http://vixra.org/pdf/1311.0132v3.pdf (Gravitational Wave Generator via Tokamak Physics)



[PDF] Gravitational Wave (GW) Radiation Pattern at the Focus of a High-Frequency GW (HFGW) Generator and Aerospace Applications | Semantic Scholar (Gravitational Wave (GW) Radiation Pattern at the Focus of a High-Frequency GW (HFGW) Generator and Aerospace Applications)



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.02443.pdf (HFGW/laser plasma interaction)



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.6148.pdf (Electromagnetic and gravitational radiation from the coherent oscillation of electron-positron pairs and fields)



The nuclear fusion tokamak uses a similar design to create/produce electron-positron pairs from the ether wave structure which permeates all of space.





"The patent application for a “Plasma Compression Fusion Device” was just published on September 26 after being lodged on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy back on March 22, 2019. The inventor is Dr. Salvator Pais, who works at the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division and has previously lodged other patents on behalf of the Navy:"



(Craft using an inertial mass reduction device)

(High Frequency Gravitational Wave Generator)

At present there are few envisioned fusion reactors/devices that come in a small, compact package (ranging from 0.3 to 2 meters in diameter) and typically they use different versions of plasma magnetic confinement. Three such devices are the Lockheed Martin (LM) Skunk Works Compact Fusion Reactor (LM-CFR), the EMC2 Polywell fusion concept, and the Princeton Field-Reversed Configuration (PFRC) machine. These devices feature short plasma confinement times, possible plasma instabilities with the scaling of size, and it is questionable whether they have the ability of achieving the break-even fusion condition, let alone a self-sustained plasma burn leading to ignition.



The plasma compression fusion device utilizes controlled motion of electrically charged matter via accelerated vibration and/or accelerated spin subjected to smooth yet rapid acceleration-deceleration-acceleration transients, in order to generate extremely high energy/high intensity electromagnetic fields. These fields not only confine the plasma core but also greatly compress it (by inducing a high energy negative potential well) so as to produce a high power density plasma burn, leading to ignition."

Dr. Salvatore Cezar Pais

Naval Air War Center Aircraft Division



https://patents.google.com/patent/U...r=Salvatore+Pais&oq=inventor:(Salvatore+Pais)


"It is claimed in the patent application that this plasma compression fusion device is capable of producing power in the gigawatt (1 billion watts) to terawatt (1 trillion watts) range and above with input power only in the kilowatt (1,000 watts) to megawatt (1,000,000 watts) range."



In a significant breakthrough, Dr. Salvatore Pais' paper on double torsion technology applied to portable fusion devices has been published by a major and prestigious mainstream scientific journal.



https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8871349


The Plasma Compression Fusion Device—Enabling Nuclear Fusion Ignition

Publisher: IEEE



November 2019 (Vol 47, Issue 11), IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)

The plasma compression fusion device (PCFD) generates the energy gain by plasma compression-induced nuclear fusion. This concept has the capability of maximizing the product of plasma pressure and energy confinement time to maximize the energy gain, and thus give rise to fusion ignition conditions. The preferred embodiment of this original concept uses a hollow cross-duct configuration of circular cross section in which the concentrated magnetic energy flux from two pairs of opposing curved-headed counter-spinning conical structures (possibly made from an alloy of tungsten with high capacitance) whose outer surfaces are electrically charged compresses a gaseous mixture of fusion fuel into a plasma, heated to extreme temperatures and pressures.

The PCFD concept can produce power in the gigawatt to terawatt range (and higher) with input power in the kilowatt to megawatt range.



Dr. Pais' other major paper was also published in a mainstream scientific journal:



https://www.scribd.com/document/408469834/High-Frequency-Gravitational-Waves-Induced-Propulsion2017


https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/2017-01-2040

 

[grav]

1. Why would THEY lie to us?
Greed. Fear. And mind control. I don't know if there's a thread about MKULTRA and other CIA methods that turn people into mass murderers and other psychopaths. Call me crazy, but I do think that archons are real. The devil made me do it. Oh, yes. That's no excuse, of course, but we've seen many many examples of ordinary people who have done extraordinarily evil acts.

What about shills? Do they do their dirty deeds because, meh, the Control System cannot be defeated, so I may as well work for the winning team. Like this guy, who probably posts incognito on forums. I'm not saying he posts here. Or am I?

Mick West - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mick_West
Mick West is a British-American science writer, skeptical investigator, and retired video game programmer. He is the creator of the websites Contrail Science and Metabunk, and he investigates and debunks ... Skepticism career · Websites · Escaping the Rabbit Hole

2. the moon
Back in the 60s a scientist told a news reporter that there was NO DOUBT that the moon was a plasma phenomenon. I guess the sun is another form of it.
Where, how? Maybe ionized noble gases which are illuminated like string lights we see in Las Vegas signs and Christmas decorations.

There is NO way a physicist or astronomer can honestly think the moon is a rock that hovers above the spinning, vortexing globe. In their case, they lie because of the 4 p's: paycheck, pension, prestige, avoiding pushing up pansies.

 

[E.Bearclaw]

2. the moon
Back in the 60s a scientist told a news reporter that there was NO DOUBT that the moon was a plasma phenomenon. I guess the sun is another form of it.
Where, how? Maybe ionized noble gases which are illuminated like string lights we see in Las Vegas signs and Christmas decorations.

There is NO way a physicist or astronomer can honestly think the moon is a rock that hovers above the spinning, vortexing globe. In their case, they lie because of the 4 p's: paycheck, pension, prestige, avoiding pushing up pansies.

Whilst I would err towards the moon being a plasma phenomenon (based upon personal observations during personal experiments with expanded consciousness). I have searched for information on this particular scientist, and his theories, and cannot find it anywhere. His confidence is compelling. Are you aware of anything?

They do a bit of a deep dive into him here, although it yields nothing further. Either he never existed or his works have been completely redacted.

PLASMA MOON SCIENTIST 1965

I guess he could be covered up, and probably most likely as his narrative runs very counter to the moon is thing like NASA says narrative, and he does refer to experiments that prove this. Possibly they would be repeatable? However, without the evidence the video suffers from a lack of proof.

Does anyone have any ideas on how one could scientifically prove the moon to be plasma? If Robert Foster could, it should be possible right?

 

[sandokhan]

When, where, how?
Fermilab Today

Now, even more direct proofs for the existence of gravitons/antigravitons.

Gravitational fields consist of gravitons.

Proof comes from a mainstream paper:


High Frequency Gravitational Waves - Induced Propulsion2017 | Field (Physics) | Electromagnetic Radiation

SAE MOBILUS

"Electromagnetic (EM) radiation, caused by accelerating electrically charged objects, when passed through a static magnetic field (of constant magnetic flux density) gives rise to gravitational waves at the same frequency with the EM radiation. This phenomenon is known as the Gertsenshtein Effect.

Artificially generated, high energy, electromagnetic fields can interact strongly with the local Vacuum energy state, an aggregate/collective state comprised of the superposition of all fluctuations in the collective of quantum fields (including EM and gravitational fields, among others) permeating a given spacetime locality. According to quantum field theory, this strong interaction between the fields is based on the mechanism of transfer of vibrational energy between the fields, further inducing local fluctuations in adjacent quantum fields which permeate that spacetime locality (these fields may or may not be electromagnetic in nature).

Think of the local Vacuum energy state as the collective energy state(structure) comprised of the ground state of minimum energy (baseline fluctuations) that is the quantum vacuum, and the excited state of energy (induced fluctuations) generated by matter or any other source of energy in that spacetime locality. According to quantum field theory, matter, energy, spacetime are emergent constructs which arise out of a foundational structure, the fundamental framework which is the Vacuum energy state.

These extremely high graviton production rates further show that if multiple high power, high frequency gravitational waves were to be focused on a particular point in a spacetime locality, they can induce a spacetime curvature singularity, namely a “highly distorted and disrupted patch of spacetime fabric”."

Dr. Salvatore Pais
NAWCAD [Naval Air War Center Aircraft Division]




https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0009291.pdf

An Explanation on Negative Mass-Square of Neutrinos

The square of the neutrino mass is measured in tritium beta decay experiments by fitting the shape of the beta spectrum near endpoint. In many experiments, it has been found to be negative.

https://cds.cern.ch/record/466273/files/0009291.pdf

It has been known for many years that the measured mass-square of neutrino exhibits significantly negative value.

http://fizika.hfd.hr/fizika_b/bv02/b11p049.pdf

Interesting enough, the pion decay experiment also obtained a negative value for the muon neutrinos [5], m^2(νµ)=(−0.016 ± 0.023) MeV^2.

https://cds.cern.ch/record/294413/files/SCAN-9601133.pdf (pg 29)



The next equation, (36), is also negative; however, the authors have also refused to accept that the muon neutrino has negative/imaginary mass (a tachyon). Simply put, the scientists involved in the experiment refused to accept its outcome.




Causality and Locality in Modern Physics

Dr. Erasmo Recami:

Classical tachyons and possible applications

Classical tachyons and possible applications : a review



The unification of electromagnetism and gravity was taken to an even higher level by Dr. M.E. Gertsenshtein and by Dr. Y.B. Zel'dovich:

Wave resonance of light and gravitational waves

http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_014_01_0084.pdf

Electromagnetic and gravitational waves in a stationary magnetic field

http://jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_038_04_0652.pdf

GERTSENSHTEIN-ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT: GRAVITON-PHOTON CONVERSION

This is pure ELECTROGRAVITY.

The transformation of an electromagnetic wave into a gravitational wave when the electromagnetic wave propagates through a constant transverse magnetic field.

Inverse GZ effect: the birth of an electromagnetic field under the action of metric perturbation (equivalent of GW action) in the strong magnetic field.

The Gertsenshtein-Zel'dovich effect can be used to create electron-positron pairs torsion fields (dextrorotatory subquarks-laevorotatory subquarks) out of the ether wave lattice.

It is a feature of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for generating an impenetrable defensive shield to Sea and Land as well as Space-based military and civilian assets, protecting these assets from such threats as Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles, Radar Evading Cruise Missiles, Top Attack for Main Battle Tanks (land and sea based systems), as well as counteracting the effects of solar-induced Coronal Mass Ejections or defending critical military satellites in an ASAT role (space based system).

US10135366B2 - Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field - Google Patents

The scientist behind the HEEMFG works at the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD) on advanced technology concepts. On two occasions, Dr. James Sheehy, the Chief Technology Officer of the Naval Aviation Enterprise, a US Navy affiliated organization, has intervened on behalf of Dr. Pais’ patent applications deeming them “operable” .

 

[FarewellAngelina]

I would like to point out that after Isaac Newton formulated his theory of gravity , which predicted that the earth must be an oblate sphere , The French Academy of Science tasked Giovanni Cassini with carrying out a scientific geometric survey of degrees of latitude along an arc of longitude across France in order to test this novel idea . Degrees of latitude are simple to measure using the star Polaris .

Newtons theory predicted that degrees of latitude would lengthen towards the pole since the light rays from that star come in parallel since the star is very ,very, very far away . If the earth was perfect sphere ( prevailing view at that time ) then each degree of latitude would be equidistant apart. Simple premise that uses no assumptions - other than the stars being very,very very far away- but will provide empirical evidence of the shape of earth.

The survey took several years and Cassinis' results brought the "age of reason" to a halt. He found that latitude actually shortened towards the pole . Over 8+ degrees across France that degrees of latitude shortened northward by a factor of about 1/800.

This meant that the earth was neither an oblate or perfect sphere . His results were checked as correct by other astronomers of the time. If the earth was flat and the pole star was not very,very, very, far away then that empirical evidence would fit that model although the theorists could not consider that possibility.

Huge controversy ensued , theorists on Newtons side and real practical scientists on the other . Of course the theorists , with all their power and control waited many years till after Cassini died and gradually managed to shove real science aside . It's all worth researching although getting harder to find info on t'web.

Sandokhan has pointed out already that Prof Maurice Allais and his empirical experiments did once again destroy the currently held gravitational view of the cosmos.

Any mention of gravity makes my eyes glaze over . Theoretical science based on globe theory can only ever be imaginary .

1. Why would THEY lie to us?
Greed. Fear. And mind control. I don't know if there's a thread about MKULTRA and other CIA methods that turn people into mass murderers and other psychopaths. Call me crazy, but I do think that archons are real. The devil made me do it. Oh, yes. That's no excuse, of course, but we've seen many many examples of ordinary people who have done extraordinarily evil acts.

What about shills? Do they do their dirty deeds because, meh, the Control System cannot be defeated, so I may as well work for the winning team. Like this guy, who probably posts incognito on forums. I'm not saying he posts here. Or am I?

Mick West - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mick_West
Mick West is a British-American science writer, skeptical investigator, and retired video game programmer. He is the creator of the websites Contrail Science and Metabunk, and he investigates and debunks ... Skepticism career · Websites · Escaping the Rabbit Hole

2. the moon
Back in the 60s a scientist told a news reporter that there was NO DOUBT that the moon was a plasma phenomenon. I guess the sun is another form of it.
Where, how? Maybe ionized noble gases which are illuminated like string lights we see in Las Vegas signs and Christmas decorations.

There is NO way a physicist or astronomer can honestly think the moon is a rock that hovers above the spinning, vortexing globe. In their case, they lie because of the 4 p's: paycheck, pension, prestige, avoiding pushing up pansies.

Sorry for being pedantic Grav but theres 6p's in that little sentence.

 

[Jd755]

Now, even more direct proofs for the existence of gravitons/antigravitons.

Gravitational fields consist of gravitons.

Proof comes from a mainstream paper:


High Frequency Gravitational Waves - Induced Propulsion2017 | Field (Physics) | Electromagnetic Radiation

SAE MOBILUS

Abstract

It may be possible to generate high power / high frequency gravitational waves (HFGWs) by high frequency accelerated axial rotation (spin) and/or accelerated high frequency vibration of an electrically charged, possibly asymmetric structure, within the context of non-equilibrium thermodynamics, namely far-from-equilibrium physics, highly non-linear in nature.
The structure which is the HFGW generator (HFGWG), has the ability to control the accelerated modes of vibration and spin of its electrically charged surfaces, in particular the rapid rates of change of accelerated-decelerated-accelerated vibration and/or accelerated-decelerated-accelerated gyration (axial spin) of these electrified surfaces, in this manner delaying the onset of relaxation to thermodynamic equilibrium, thus generating a physical mechanism which may induce anomalous effects. Under certain conditions, involving rapid acceleration transients, it is observed that there will be exponential growth in electromagnetic energy flux with accelerating vibration. In the present paper, high power HFGWs are generated by enabling the Gertsenshtein effect, that is gravitational wave production by propagating electromagnetic radiation through strong magnetic fields.
Controlled motion of charged matter under rapid acceleration transients may enable macroscopic quantum coherence, namely possible quantum mechanical behavior of macroscopic objects. Moreover, the accelerated vibration and/or spin of charged matter may generate high power / high frequency gravitational waves which can be used in a variety of applications, such as advanced field propulsion, namely the design of a workable space drive.
Therefore, it may be feasible to propel a hybrid craft equipped with an HFGWG, by producing high frequency gravitational waves which in turn generate their own gravitational fields upon which the craft would propagate in a ‘wave-surfing’ fashion.

It is a theoretical paper.based on more theoretical paper.

 

[sandokhan]

It is a theoretical paper.based on more theoretical paper.

So, why aren't gravitational waves (and therefore gravitons) being detected all over the place, in many labs around the world?

Because physicists are using the wrong formula.

It is one of the most interesting and least known facets of modern physics. It had everything to do with the reason why A. Gullstrand did not award Einstein the Nobel prize for general relativity.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2194405#msg2194405

In Newtonian gravity, the two-body problem has a well-defined compact analytic solution. However, in general relativity, the problem is recognized that it cannot be solved analytically. However, many believed that the two-body problem could be solved in the perturbation approach. Their confidence is based on that the linearized Einstein equation has a bounded dynamic solution.

For the dynamic case when gravitational waves are involved, it has been proven in 1995 that the Einstein equation does not have any bounded dynamic solution. This has far reaching consequences.

Thus, Einstein is wrong in claiming his calculation of the perihelion of Mercury is valid, but Gullstrand, Chairman (1922-1929) of the Nobel Prize Committee for Physics is right who suspected that Einstein‘s calculation is invalid because it cannot be derived from the approach of a solution for many-body problems.

Advanced Flat Earth Theory (superb analysis)

Advanced Flat Earth Theory (excellent analysis, including field equations)


Binary Pulsar Gravitational Waves

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2229278#msg2229278

The Einstein equation cannot have a bounded dynamic solution for a two-body problem or gravitational wave solutions; and the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsars experiments actually support the modified Einstein equation.

Einstein claimed in his 1923 Nobel lecture that his considerations led to the theory of gravity, which yields the Newtonian theory as a first approximation, as well as yielding the motion of the perihelion of Mercury, the deflection of light by the sun.

In so doing, he did not respond to those questions raised by Gullstrand on the perihelion of Mercury. In particular, he failed to show the existence of a bounded dynamic solution, whose existence is crucial for the perturbation approach to calculate the perihelion of Mercury. However, The Nobel Prize Committee, well known for its cautious attitude, would not have changed its opinion based on Einstein’s statements alone; Gullstrand would have to have been proven wrong mathematically.

A paper by T. Levi-Civita in 1917, one of the inventors of Tensor Calculus, showing that Einstein's pseudo-tensor is nonsense because it leads to the requirement for a first-order, intrinsic, differential invariant, which, as is well known to the pure mathematicians, does not exist:

Wayback Machine

 

[Skydog]

I started watching Ewaranon’s most recent LHFE video again this morning (for 3rd time) on YT and noticed commercials were added in for the first time.

Ewaranon has said that he would never monetize his channel. So YT clearly must have added them in without his consent to piss off his viewers. And the commercials were about the secret to picking up women of all things. Probably selected to distract what YT perceives to be his target audience.

I just tried to pull up the episode again now to finish watching it and low and behold - YT wiped his account clean of all his videos.

Thank god for bitchute and odysee (for now)

FUYT

 

[dreamtime]

I started watching Ewaranon’s most recent LHFE video again this morning (for 3rd time) on YT and noticed commercials were added in for the first time.

Ewaranon has said that he would never monetize his channel. So YT clearly must have added them in without his consent to piss off his viewers. And the commercials were about the secret to picking up women of all things. Probably selected to distract what YT perceives to be his target audience.

I just tried to pull up the episode again now to finish watching it and low and behold - YT wiped his account clean of all his videos.

Thank god for bitchute and odysee (for now)

FUYT

Youtube has announced a couple months ago they will add ads to small channels.

The Google-owned video-sharing platform is giving itself some additional space to profit from the content it hosts. Once the updated rules come into force in June, YouTube will start putting ads on channels that have too few subscribers and views to qualify for its Partner Program, a mechanism that allows owners of bigger channels to monetize popularity by splitting ad revenue with the platform.

https://www.rt.com/news/524549-youtube-monetization-rules-creators/
But indeed his channel videos are gone: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy6EQBAe0M7lsrFjGPbKQhg/videos

Probably deleted by the owner, though.