Hello! Sorry for the long post, but I wanted to do the questions justice.
Background on me:
- I think I had learned in public school that history is written by the victors.
- Since c. 2007-2008, I have had an active interest in utilizing technology to help improve decision through offloading, scaffolding, alternative consideration, and belief update monitoring.
- Around 2012, inspiration arrived to do a first deepish dive into alternative theory review, consuming swaths of the the Biblioteca Playedes.
- Then, online communication afforded near real time observation of discrepancies between officially and independently reported analyses of so-called history in the making.
- Also, Khalezov and Fomenko were interesting to read and read about, respectively.
- I believe that many of the most pressing issues facing humanity may be addressable through peaceable actions leading to increased awareness, but I acknowledge that this may be naive.
- I am open to reframing my perspectives, but moreover want to learn more about the nature of things as they can be observed, in order to be better positioned to contribute to the universe in accordance with the gifts bestowed upon me.
how you discovered the forum
Not exactly sure how I discovered SH, but I think it was either:
- a link from a comment on a Youtube page related to health or (non-mainstream) virology discussion, or more likely
- a highly ranked Google search result for some topic I had come across and was curious about more perspectives on, such as Tartaria, mud flood, dinosaurs, even possibly FE, etc.
I will update this post if I find out, but I think the origination point is lost.
whether you were a member on the old forum
I was not a member on the old forum, but I read it (with great fascination) for a couple of months prior to its defunction. I had attempted to join, but it appeared that signup was closed. I believe a post by KD stated that moderating influxes of new members had become limiting. Super grateful to have been able to join the SH community in its reincarnation.
what interests you the most about stolen history
Most interesting about SH is that there's a great intersection of important topics--power, society, technology, religion--in such a way that each topic can be found increasingly in more beautiful alignment with itself and the others:
- The nature of the flow of information can be extraordinarily interesting.
- The act of consideration of information can interesting.
- The content of the information itself can be interesting.
- The potential for utility of information is interesting.
More specifically, many topics have been fascinating, including architecture, possible city resets, technology of the times as evidenced by photographs or text, chronology (including 1000 years of phantom time), the histories of nations (especially America), and apparent biblical concordances with recently unearthed (to me) alternative perspectives.