How Fake Is Roman Antiquity? (Part 1/3, Unz review)

Oh i see! So there's coins that match and others that are totally off?? Got it, sorry for being kinda slow thinking :p
My suggestion is to use the search function to find pertinent info within the site before you start your research outside of the site, to save yourself a bit of time and avoid redundancy within the site.

You'll come to find threads like this one:

The Church Inquisition did not persecute people, but counterfeit coins

The Church Inquisition did not persecute people, but counterfeit coins
 
My suggestion is to use the search function to find pertinent info within the site before you start your research outside of the site, to save yourself a bit of time and avoid redundancy within the site.

You'll come to find threads like this one:

The Church Inquisition did not persecute people, but counterfeit coins

The Church Inquisition did not persecute people, but counterfeit coins
That's a good thread, read it twice so far. I'm wondering if some of the older coins, let's say circa 1500s-1600s, could have been made later to fit within a given narrative. If the answer is yes, how to prove it?? To me the more expensive the coin, is the bigger reason to be skeptical, some of the allegedly first brazilian Gold coins made by the dutch west indies goes for the price of a vrand new sports car
 
Imo, they never even try to understand anything - they just tell it the way they want it.

Let's face it, if they were critical thinkers they wouldn't be leftists. 😄
Spot on !! Goes back to individual and then collective temperament. Critical thinking = courage, brave individual. Group think, herd default = fear, compliance, manipulated. The elite behind the PTB then have the weakness identified.
 
Not sure if it's still relevant to the topic but look at this, an "anglo saxon" coin was "found" by a metal detector guy and it will be sold by £10,000 at an auction.....
The best part, dated between 650-670AD
How tf can Gold be dated???

Screenshot_20220227-000909_Facebook.jpg
 
Very simple. They look at the 'style' of the coin, the so-called 'Saxon' runic writing and symbols used, look up the same in their accepted historical narrative and ascribe the date. Easily accepted by all mainstream 'historians' and coin collectors.
Omg, no wonder it's 99% impossible to talk to coin collectors about our hidden past. Even if something screams bullshit they won't see it
Check this out, not suspicious at all right?

FB_IMG_1645957072463.jpg
 
Can all this chronological speculation on Rome be reconciled with the Jewish traditions about Rome, its Edomitic origins, the many references to Rome and its personalities in the Talmud and Midrash, Josephus, the destruction of the 2nd Temple by the Romans (70CE?), the war of Betar, and the exiling of the Jews?
 
It might be a bit off topic but in 2019 a group of archaeologists were called to the zoo at Rio de Janeiro because artifacts from the brazilian empire were found, along with remains of buildings and structures that were used by workers, military personel, free slaves and more! The narrative is that after the republican coup, said buildings were demolished.
Here is a photo of one of the group cleaning a piece of what it used to be floor, i noticed the obvious "roman" style immediately 82031282_ancelmo_gois_-.jpg
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top