- Joined
- Aug 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,140
- Reaction score
- 2,171
Humans engineered? Unusual biology & cultural dissonance
- Thread starter solarbard
- Start date
ParanthropusSlam
Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 39
Why is that? I've eaten meat raw before and I know people who eat raw meat, both personally and on the internet. There are some people who only eat raw meat too. So why do we cook? Simply because we can. The other carnivores cannot create fire/ovens so they are forced to eat their meat raw (except when a forest fire occurs and then they are able to feast on the cooked remains). Cooking meat has a trade-off between the water-soluble nutrients lost to cooking and the denaturing of amino acids, in which the denaturing of amino acids makes it easier to absorb into our bloodstream; so it's the best idea to eat your nutrient-dense organs raw (so that you get all the micro-nutrients) and to cook the protein-dense muscle meat (so that you can absorb most of the protein). I do have to note that our stomach acid is able to denature amino acids, which is why lower carnivores such as felines and canines are able to absorb protein in the first place; but you get the most bang for your buck protein-wise if you cook it.
Huh. I did not know that.
R
Runa
Guest
Hair is a bodily excretion I do think diet and many other factors are involved. Maybe adding non indigenous goods in the trades of our recent history has played some role. It leads me to so many unseeming conclusions.
This is too funny folks...one of the most well known raw meat dishes is called Steak Tartar! Cut up raw meat with tons of garlic eaten raw by the Tartarian Hordes.
Safranek
Core Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
- Messages
- 477
- Reaction score
- 1,572
I can see how his hypothesis has merit given the very reasonable explanation based on valid evidence. However, he is excluding the possibility of a third (or maybe more) genetic donors. His proposition for a large brain and the bipedal ability is highly questionable.
Following his own hypothesis of hybridizing, the probability of additional specimens would explain those, but he would have to find them first. Here is where the uncomfortable issue arises regarding a potential planned hybridization as opposed to natural - the large brain it would require to have the knowledge to produce it.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
- Messages
- 2,005
- Reaction score
- 8,103
*Note: I merged this thread with a previous one by OP ("Strange Things About Humans Everybody Just Ignores"*
There's a strange discrepancy between our past, and our biological nature.
People clearly remember a "Golden Age" type of past. And even in the Renaissance paintings, this past was still alive in the form of an ideal to strive for.
The climate probably was extremely stable, nature was lush. Basically, there was no fight for survival at all. The bible also implies that even animals were friendly and not killing other animals or humans.
Technically, there are two options. Either humans were genetically changed by more advanced entities, or the Fall was due to a change in environment, and the changing nature of humans was due to an adaption to the environment.
The spiritual struggle, the foundation of our religions, seems to result from this discrepancy between our current biology, and our spiritual nature. There's a part in ourselves that wants to reach higher to god, and a part that wants to identify with the material animalistic world.
This duality could be explained either by genetic manipulation, or by a slow and subtle devolution within a world that requires aggression and survival tactics.
Over the course of 1,000 years, many things in the human organism can change in extreme ways, as the organism adapts to the environment, so a lot of the changes could be simply due to humans living in the context of fight for survival for hundreds of years.
The Hybrid hypothesis makes a lot of sense, and it's hard to argue against the logic. I wonder whether something else could account for the genetic similarity though.
Since religions speak of rulers with more advanced powers than normal humans, a genetic manipulation seems more likely than merely a slow change over time. The latter probably also happened, but wasn't as dramatic.
I was skimming through this "rebuttal" of the Hybrid Hypothesis by one of those Sceptics and it contains some valid criticism why a natural process doesn't make sense. (A pig mating with a chimpanzee, and then one of those takes care of the offspring, and later the offspring mates with each other and so forth).
An artificial process (the ancient gods changing our DNA) resolves the issues with the hypothesis, including brain size. If someone combined the original human DNA with pig DNA, in the context of advanced technological knowledge and abilities, they would have created hundreds of thousands of new humans at once and populate the earth in many different regions at once, to ensure survival.
There's a strange discrepancy between our past, and our biological nature.
People clearly remember a "Golden Age" type of past. And even in the Renaissance paintings, this past was still alive in the form of an ideal to strive for.
The climate probably was extremely stable, nature was lush. Basically, there was no fight for survival at all. The bible also implies that even animals were friendly and not killing other animals or humans.
Technically, there are two options. Either humans were genetically changed by more advanced entities, or the Fall was due to a change in environment, and the changing nature of humans was due to an adaption to the environment.
The spiritual struggle, the foundation of our religions, seems to result from this discrepancy between our current biology, and our spiritual nature. There's a part in ourselves that wants to reach higher to god, and a part that wants to identify with the material animalistic world.
This duality could be explained either by genetic manipulation, or by a slow and subtle devolution within a world that requires aggression and survival tactics.
Over the course of 1,000 years, many things in the human organism can change in extreme ways, as the organism adapts to the environment, so a lot of the changes could be simply due to humans living in the context of fight for survival for hundreds of years.
The Hybrid hypothesis makes a lot of sense, and it's hard to argue against the logic. I wonder whether something else could account for the genetic similarity though.
Since religions speak of rulers with more advanced powers than normal humans, a genetic manipulation seems more likely than merely a slow change over time. The latter probably also happened, but wasn't as dramatic.
I was skimming through this "rebuttal" of the Hybrid Hypothesis by one of those Sceptics and it contains some valid criticism why a natural process doesn't make sense. (A pig mating with a chimpanzee, and then one of those takes care of the offspring, and later the offspring mates with each other and so forth).
An artificial process (the ancient gods changing our DNA) resolves the issues with the hypothesis, including brain size. If someone combined the original human DNA with pig DNA, in the context of advanced technological knowledge and abilities, they would have created hundreds of thousands of new humans at once and populate the earth in many different regions at once, to ensure survival.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,140
- Reaction score
- 2,171
Fwiw, I absolutely think there is a third party involved that undertook the engineering, and at least one other species involved in the mix. The site and the evidence it presents is useful as a baseline or platform for further speculation.
Eugene M. McCarthy's hybridization theory includes a crucial step called backcrossing.
The initial mating happens between two species (usually by rape) and a viable hybrid is occasionally born. This hybrid would then breed exclusively with the species raising it, never crossbreeding again.
The example we are talking about with humans is pig and chimpanzee or bonobo. The female chimpanzee got raped by a male pig/boar when she was in estrus/heat and he chanced upon her in the forest. McCarthy says it's common behavior for female chimpanzees to present their behinds sexually as a fear response. Then she had a hybrid child, most likely with the body more piglike and head more chimplike (the heads tend to take after the mother and bodies take after the father with any mammalian hybrid). This child might have been raised with the mother's group or kicked out to fend for itself.
- If the hybrid was female, then a male chimpanzee mating with it would give it the primate body instead of 4 legs and hoofs. The head would take after the mother with a mixture of chimp and pig. This "backcrossed" second generation would have no problem mating with more chimpanzees regardless of whether they were male or female, and might also breed with their own siblings that looked like themselves. They would continue to backcross like this until they became a separate enough group to be their own species. THEN they got uplifted and messed with genetically and became the humans we are today.
- If the hybrid was male he would mate with a female chimpanzee (or maybe a pig). This offspring would have a chimp face with a body a mixture of pig and chimp. I really don't think this version would be viable. I'm imagining some pretty strange combinations.
McCarthy also talks about gorillas being a hybrid of giant forest pig and chimpanzees or bonobos. It's pretty convincing. And gorillas are a whole species of their own. Humans could have easily developed in a similar manner (before genetic manipulation). There's even a known African hybrid of gorillas and chimpanzees called Koolokambas. Yet another distinct hybrid species with its own range.
The Hybrid Hypothesis: The Gorilla and the Koolokamba
As far as humans being different races and colors, McCarthy has examples of different breeds of chimps and bonobos from around the world that match the colors of the humans in those parts of the world. Later, each uplifted group would be suited to their local environment.
The initial mating happens between two species (usually by rape) and a viable hybrid is occasionally born. This hybrid would then breed exclusively with the species raising it, never crossbreeding again.
The example we are talking about with humans is pig and chimpanzee or bonobo. The female chimpanzee got raped by a male pig/boar when she was in estrus/heat and he chanced upon her in the forest. McCarthy says it's common behavior for female chimpanzees to present their behinds sexually as a fear response. Then she had a hybrid child, most likely with the body more piglike and head more chimplike (the heads tend to take after the mother and bodies take after the father with any mammalian hybrid). This child might have been raised with the mother's group or kicked out to fend for itself.
- If the hybrid was female, then a male chimpanzee mating with it would give it the primate body instead of 4 legs and hoofs. The head would take after the mother with a mixture of chimp and pig. This "backcrossed" second generation would have no problem mating with more chimpanzees regardless of whether they were male or female, and might also breed with their own siblings that looked like themselves. They would continue to backcross like this until they became a separate enough group to be their own species. THEN they got uplifted and messed with genetically and became the humans we are today.
- If the hybrid was male he would mate with a female chimpanzee (or maybe a pig). This offspring would have a chimp face with a body a mixture of pig and chimp. I really don't think this version would be viable. I'm imagining some pretty strange combinations.
McCarthy also talks about gorillas being a hybrid of giant forest pig and chimpanzees or bonobos. It's pretty convincing. And gorillas are a whole species of their own. Humans could have easily developed in a similar manner (before genetic manipulation). There's even a known African hybrid of gorillas and chimpanzees called Koolokambas. Yet another distinct hybrid species with its own range.
The Hybrid Hypothesis: The Gorilla and the Koolokamba
As far as humans being different races and colors, McCarthy has examples of different breeds of chimps and bonobos from around the world that match the colors of the humans in those parts of the world. Later, each uplifted group would be suited to their local environment.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2020
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 1,150
Dreamtime said:
This experience of life is characteristic of farmed stock.
Thus seeding the story of 'Manna from Heaven'.
The conceptual trap humans can escape - though it takes time and effort - is to appreciate that 'human history' may have been cobbled together from the physical remains and documents of some other beneficiary's past. Gross reworking of evidence, plus the creation of a great deal of new evidence and explanatory 'history' is very findable. The signposts are mudflood, the Deluge, ruins that are physically inconsistent with narrative and 'science', etc, etc.
It's very possible the whole human environment was created in one go a few hundred years during the resetting of a previous system. Perhaps after the flushing and restocking of a food and labour production machine. Convincing humans of this would be like trying to convince yeast that their world is a vat in a brewery that is merely part of a supplier's logistical chain that is merely part of a much larger... endeavour.
Anyway...
If I recall correctly, McCarthy also points out that human-animal hybrids often have jutting chins.
From his MacroEvolution website, 2. The Other Parent, the next three images should be animated gifs. If not animating, click on the 'source' link to see the chins properly:
This tendency for hybrids to have jutting chins is intriguing because many 'caricatures' of 'human' executioners, butchers and elite of the past also depict a jutting chin.
From Medieval Wall Painting in the English Parish Church: Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire:
We see it in caricatures of 'Dr Syntax', who I suspect is based on the John Byng of The Torrington Diaries:
And:
Three Edinburgh Bucks. Source: A series of original portraits and caricature etchings
Skulls of American Adena giant elite. Source: probably The Adena People, Snow and Webb via Giants and Ancient North American Warfare
Quoting Don Dragoo from Giants and Ancient North American Warfare:
Given the oddness around what is easily available from Webb and Snow's The Adena People and what is not (see below), I presume we're being guided to associate these chins with a warder/guard/stock-manager class. Perhaps they were cowboys in more than just the orthodox sense.
Anyway, jutting chins show up in more fanciful imagery - and then again - perhaps not so fanciful:
Loki. Source
Old Edinburgh Guard. Source: Reminiscences of Old Edinburgh, Vol II
Devil playing cards per post 118032
In general, these jutting chinned images show up in a martial context; imagery that, from a human point of view, involves killing or 'bad stuff'.
I'm not saying there is a proven connection. We should also note that the Adena and Dragoo material cited here is archived as borrow-only, despite being old, and that The Torrington Diaries were published in approx 1934 and again in 1958. Which makes them suspect as sources. We should suspect all digital content too.
However, there seems to be a possible correlation and it may be worth flagging here if you see more examples of it.
Similarly, there seems to be a long nose connection with these entities and with imagery of blemiya overseeing humans as the humans do farm labour work. That's what the Edinburgh Old Guard image may be showing.
This experience of life is characteristic of farmed stock.
Thus seeding the story of 'Manna from Heaven'.
The conceptual trap humans can escape - though it takes time and effort - is to appreciate that 'human history' may have been cobbled together from the physical remains and documents of some other beneficiary's past. Gross reworking of evidence, plus the creation of a great deal of new evidence and explanatory 'history' is very findable. The signposts are mudflood, the Deluge, ruins that are physically inconsistent with narrative and 'science', etc, etc.
It's very possible the whole human environment was created in one go a few hundred years during the resetting of a previous system. Perhaps after the flushing and restocking of a food and labour production machine. Convincing humans of this would be like trying to convince yeast that their world is a vat in a brewery that is merely part of a supplier's logistical chain that is merely part of a much larger... endeavour.
Anyway...
If I recall correctly, McCarthy also points out that human-animal hybrids often have jutting chins.
From his MacroEvolution website, 2. The Other Parent, the next three images should be animated gifs. If not animating, click on the 'source' link to see the chins properly:
This tendency for hybrids to have jutting chins is intriguing because many 'caricatures' of 'human' executioners, butchers and elite of the past also depict a jutting chin.
From Medieval Wall Painting in the English Parish Church: Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire:
Detail from the above, also with tungsten hue removed:
And:
Three Edinburgh Bucks. Source: A series of original portraits and caricature etchings
Skulls of American Adena giant elite. Source: probably The Adena People, Snow and Webb via Giants and Ancient North American Warfare
Quoting Don Dragoo from Giants and Ancient North American Warfare:
Given the oddness around what is easily available from Webb and Snow's The Adena People and what is not (see below), I presume we're being guided to associate these chins with a warder/guard/stock-manager class. Perhaps they were cowboys in more than just the orthodox sense.
Anyway, jutting chins show up in more fanciful imagery - and then again - perhaps not so fanciful:
Loki. Source
Old Edinburgh Guard. Source: Reminiscences of Old Edinburgh, Vol II
Devil playing cards per post 118032
I'm not saying there is a proven connection. We should also note that the Adena and Dragoo material cited here is archived as borrow-only, despite being old, and that The Torrington Diaries were published in approx 1934 and again in 1958. Which makes them suspect as sources. We should suspect all digital content too.
However, there seems to be a possible correlation and it may be worth flagging here if you see more examples of it.
Similarly, there seems to be a long nose connection with these entities and with imagery of blemiya overseeing humans as the humans do farm labour work. That's what the Edinburgh Old Guard image may be showing.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
- Messages
- 2,005
- Reaction score
- 8,103
Wouldn't this need to happen multiple times (succesfully) to make a difference? Like 1000 or 10,000 times. I guess we would still see this happening all the time in areas where apes and pigs live, but I haven't heard of such reports.
I spent a lot of time reading McCarthy's hypothesis and website. He has stories, drawings and photos of any type of combination of animal with humans and with each other that you can imagine. Crosses of different types of animals with humans are documented more frequently than you would think. And how many more aren't documented?
He points out that hybrid species such as gorillas, humans, mules, jennies, ligars, etc. all have a really low fertility rate compared to natural species. This means that the natural species would have a much higher possibility of fertility in cross species breeding - the FIRST generation. So if the female chimps are really as submissive to sex as he says and the regular sized forest pigs are really that horny...then it could be a successful cross fairly frequently to produce a first generation chimp/pig hybrid (not yet humanoid). It really would only take a few of these successful hybrids to be fertile and carry on the important pig traits that distinguish a human from a chimp. Backcrossing means they only mate with chimps after the first time, or maybe with hybrid relatives with the same traits. The funny looking monkeys would be kicked out to live on their own, interbreed a bit in addition to backcrossing, and the desirable traits would get passed on. Eventually we get the 'hairless monkeys' we've always been called...
Then the genetic manipulation took place.
Also, this would have been long before floods and cataclysms and the Ether would have still been intact and lent life force to the union of creatures.
Every living thing was more fertile then. Trees were bigger, creatures were bigger.I like your thinking with the jutting chin. It does appear a lot in that first generation of hybrids. I think that the chin rounded off as the backcrossing developed humanoids.
But then if a group of humans later inbred, this recessive trait of a sharp chin could get re-accentuated. Like in the people you showed. Or the famous Hapsburg chin from that inbred family.
Last edited:
One thing I'd like to add is that a lot of people seem unable to comprehend the idea that penetrative, vaginal sexual intercourse creates babies. 48 percent of pregnancies globally are unplanned. How? How is it so difficult to grasp the concept of not having unprotected vaginal intercourse? The abortion issue could be solved by people simply refraining from that one particular act, but they do not. (This goes for men AND women, barring rape.) Was this lack of knowledge programmed into us to create a large population?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2020
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 1,150
Thanks for that extra evidence.
Can you cite the sources for the images? I want to check identities, time and location for the portrayed and identities of the painters. I want to see if in time and place, they were considered to be inhabitants of the the Holy Roman Empire. Also, what details, if any, are available of the circumstances of the sittings.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,140
- Reaction score
- 2,171
Seeing this list, of medieval animals
Medieval Bestiary : Beasts
made me think of this thread. Its interesting to me to hear these odd descriptions of animals: eg the ant-lion!
Medieval Bestiary : Beasts : Ant-lion
Medieval Bestiary : Beasts
made me think of this thread. Its interesting to me to hear these odd descriptions of animals: eg the ant-lion!
Medieval Bestiary : Beasts : Ant-lion
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2020
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 1,150
Maybe one of HG Wells' other 'fictional' characters - Dr Moreau (who I understand lived in Cheltenham) - was creating strange brews with stem cells in Roman baths.
From The local historian's table book, of remarkable occurrences, connected with the counties of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Northumberland, and Durham. Historical division, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, November or December 7, 1733:
You'd think he'd mention the balloon that must have been attached to the ass. Unless ass used to be the name for a load-carrying dirigible. Or unless there simply wasn't a balloon and the ass had wings.
You'd also think the spectators would have the sense to stand well clear of what must have looked like an accident in the making. Unless the spectators - as early-stage engineered intelligences - lacked our powers of foresight.
Other editions of The Local Historian's Table Book contain reports of dragon-like creatures that I haven't yet had time to collate.
Page 382 of The local historian's table book, of remarkable occurrences, connected with the counties of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Northumberland, and Durham. Historical division has a couple of interesting reports:
What would four men in a pub want with a child?
And we have this:
She may have meant the bottle. But a little birdie tells me she mistook her inner voice for the voice of Julian Jaynes:
The hosts' malfunctions were colourful. Source: Westworld S01 Ep04
Last edited:
They were not only residents of the Holy Roman Empire, they were the Emperors!
"The throne of the Holy Roman Empire was continuously occupied by the Habsburgs from 1440 until their extinction in the male line in 1740 and, after the death of Francis I, from 1765 until its dissolution in 1806." Wiki
There are multiple portraits since they were rulers. Do an image search for Hapsburg Jaw. There are several examples since it was a big family of cousins. Gotta keep the money in the family...
I don't know the name of the top pictured Hapsburg.
The lower one is Charles II of Spain, he was so inbred he could hardly eat and couldn't have children. His death caused the War for Spanish Sucession.
I ran across something else today that relates to chins. The Adena tribe found in Ohio were said to be very tall and have distinctly bifurcated chins. So a really deep cleft chin and flaring jaws. Kind of like Charles II's chin.
Don Dragoo, in discussing these "honored dead" and referring to this taller Adena stature, says in his Mounds For the Dead:
Here's the source, navigation tabs are at very bottom of each page.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.lege.net/gigantes/NAmWar3.html
Last edited:
Memphis
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2022
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 8
Well, I will try to answer briefly what I know.
1. These current bodies are an experiment of a group of extraterestrials. The DNA pecentage is not only from primates, but also from those entities. Also, their experiment included DNA from a demon from anti-universe. I bet other animal organs will fit this body.
2. Women don't find men attractive because of that demon DNA from anti-universe. Each time she had to be close with a male demon she ate his head after that by killing him. Also, women have more reptilians DNA (Adam and Eve apple), remember that. It wasn't an apple. Reptilians added more of their DNA, to the woman body, without the other extraterestrials to know (I mean those that took part in this project). Therefore women have more knowledge than men, the way of thinking is different. This is why women have to be kept 'under' man's control, they are more powerful than men. Also, women have to be kept 'under' men power because a women is powerful by herself, the universe is a 'she'. Male is a deformation of a female body. I am explaining here briefly, but of course there is more to say.
3. The current body is an eperiment. It was done intentionally to be weaker, and to live shorter. DNA was manipulated.
We can drink fresh water, I did it my whole life, we have a well for that, also live close to the capital and the water is tasty. Since I moved from there I drink bottled. Also, my family grew natural foods. We can eat that too. The problem is in the system not that we cannot eat or drink what you mention here.
4. Here I want to undertand too, who created this system? I don't know them. But previously planet was a warm place with no winter. A war happened and changed everything. Also, have no clue who is controlling the world now!!! Living in these places is more a need of survival, we have no where to go. We live where we are paid and where life is comfortable for surviving.
5. Here is about the humans mind. We think we are superior. We love animals because they are really cute.
Humans are violent toward their offsprings because they themselves have problems. Souls are different, some come here from higher realms, other from lower realms. So, in a family could come different souls. Someone is a narcissist, someone is a killer, souls have past. They are not blank souls. Also, society has influence, family history (how parents behaved toward them). This question actually has no clear answer, but more a mix of different circumstances.
6. This quesion is difficult to answer too. I personally cannot find my place. I know that I am not from this planet. I remember my planet and my people. This place is a puzzle for me. I don't understand why I am here and want to evade faster. So, many feel the same, these places are weird for them.
Monogamous and polygamous is even more complex. We reincarnate all the time. This is a natural process in universe because we want to experience something new all the time. We get bored wery fast. One life you can be a male, other a female, another something else. Some like to be a male so profound that they cannot let that go, also happens with women. I know, I was a male and female and bird...and many more. Sometimes this problems manifest because people can die suddenly and they haven't completed their previous reincarnation and has mixed feelings. Also can be because of traumas a person experienced. Example war: a sudden out of body and end of life, the person saw many things and killed and that fragmentated his/her soul. Fragmentation is actually the worst that can happen. The soul breaks in pieces, but still preserves itself. The soul reincarnates back to earth and it has different memories. So, imagine a cup that was broken but you fix it. You see the fissures, is like you can drink from that cup but still is consisting of many parts that are separate. So the person comes back into this life broken. Therefore attraction to females, males..... you name it.
I tried to answer you briefly. But of course there is a more in depth analysis.
luckyducky007
Contributor
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2021
- Messages
- 36
- Reaction score
- 36
I wouldn't say i have any answers to all of this however i would like to add my opinion to these questions.
1. I have never believed we are descended from apes. The whole evolution theory has always seemed very flawed too many gaps in explaining where man came from. Ill point out with new technology we have added to the line of previous evolutions and realized we are hybrids of the 2 or 3 groups, but still no explanation as to where homo-Sapien came from. We just were there alongside Denisovan and neanderthal. So, someone messing with our DNA to create us seems plausible.
2. I find it hard to believe females don't find males attractive, i feel this is based more from the modern perspective rather than anything historical. if this were the case we wouldn't have survived as a species. As for control of females, may stem from the bible, likely the eve story. Or even that of being more emotional and irrational. However, my view has always been that men and woman have worked together the majority of the time rather than one exerting control over the other, as both require each other to achieve a balance.
3. Solar radiation is an interesting one, we live on a planet that offers protection from the 1 Uv light that can actually help us and allows the 2 that will kill us through. If UVC is helpful, why would we want to heal the ozone if that is what is stopping it, and if it's to protect from UVa and UVb when only 7% of all solar radiation is UV it seems odd. In the 90's there was a big push to make sure the ozone healed which is odd since skin cancer has only increased not lessened as we have reversed ozone damage. We can drink fresh water and eat natural. Just fresh water can contain organisms that will make us ill, same with anything out of the dirt. which is why we clean it, and boil water.
4. This is an interesting question, I believe the earth was warmer in the past or at least the climate may have been less turbulent, when the change happened is difficult to know, could have been the first ice age.
5. Cause kitten and puppies are cute, cuter than our own offspring would be entirely subjective. And i wouldn't think that humans are unusually violent towards our offspring either, certainly can be noted in other cultures a lot more than others but have you seen how animals are to their young? I would say they are worse.
6. We do have natural habitat. Those that grew up in deserts can adapt to live in colder areas but feel at home in the hotter climate and vice versa. Monogamy and polygamy are an interesting one, while i believe we are promiscuous in youth more so, we do yearn for monogamy as we get older, we realize unconsciously we are part of a whole, just as in conception we are but 2 halves that become one, in life we require the same to continue that natural function.
Thats just my view and i suppose questions as well. I believe we were engineered and placed here alongside the natural species whether we're a mutation of an existing species i don't know. But the continual lack of a proper link or genetic ancestor only points more and more to interference.
This definitely points to an artificial creation than natural sex between two dissimilar species. I don't believe in naturalism at all, except in fine tuning to an environment over a long enough time period. The species remains the same though.
For example, a crab that enters and lives and breeds in a deep cave will have no more eyes and it becomes white coloured. It may heighten other senses to the extreme that seem "supernatural". The crab does not turn into an eyeless horse.
However, we are talking about another long gone world - the medieval period. I am willing to entertain an "energetic theory" that the energies of that period allowed for an ant to mate with a lion.
Even then, it does seem like an absolutely gigantic stretch, even if the two species were of a similar size.Maybe "reproduction" wasn't just sexual though. Could the energies be that fluid that transformations occurred more like in spirit? Who knows?
Similar threads
