Monk’s ‘Mound’ at Cahokia- is it really a buried Pyramid?

[Vulcan]

In looking up the “world’s largest pyramid”, I was surprised to see that the record-holder is not in Egypt, but rather in Mexico. It’s called Cholula, it’s near Mexico City. The reason it’s not so well-known is because it’s covered in dirt, grass and trees. They say it is several different pyramids built on top of each other like the one at Chichen Itza. (The Spanish were kind enough to build a fancy church directly on top of it.)

About 1800 miles north, we have Monk’s ‘Mound’, which miraculously avoided being torn down even as the country raced to bulldoze and flood over 90% of the ruins, mounds, and other important ancient sites in the United States during the 19th and early 20th centuries. It sure looks a lot like Cholula…

Doubly amazing for the survival of this supposed dirt mound is Cahokia’s prime location in the St Louis Metro area, next to the Mississippi. Why would a nation so intent on ignoring and destroying less impressive sites by the thousand decide to go ahead and preserve the largest one in a park complex?

Could the reason for its survival be that they couldn’t have easily torn it down, because it is not a huge pile of step pyramid-shaped dirt but in fact an actual step pyramid, just like the others in North America, only covered with a few feet of dirt like the one at Cholula, Mexico?

Can anyone think of any reasons why this theory wouldn’t be viable?

 

[TH Dialectic]

There is a huge mound near me that sticks out like a sore thumb called Freebrough Hill (around 400ft) lots of local folklore around King Arthur and Giants of the Moors. I personally think its a pyramid which has been planted over, no chance that it's natural.

TH

 

[studytruth2]

Cholula is one of the most interesting places to visit I have experienced. Energetically strong, the what might be called temple area as the back side is of remarkable stonework, and the inner tunnels are obviously not "dug out by archaeologists" as the claim made, but a part of the original construction. It was the first pyramid that I visited in my life, so there was lots I was not looking for that I would be to see it now...perhaps I should go back and give it another go over...

 

[ProfessorHotStuff]

Possible. You would suspect that in a floodplain as dangerous and constantly flooding as the confluence of the Missouri River and Mississippi River you'd want to build with something more substantial than dirt.

Though personally, I suspect the mounds may just be a safe place to retreat during flooding. Even in modern times the river delta gets wrecked by floods periodically, despite modern engineering to prevent it.

On another note: in the artist interpretations the grass of the mounds is always even and freshly mowed. Does anyone know how people cut grass back in the old days? Especially within the mainstream paradigm. How the hell do you cut even grass without metal? Southern Illinois is a humid sub-tropical climate designation, the grass there can go full wilderness over the course of a few weeks of rain and sun.

 

[TH Dialectic]

Possible. You would suspect that in a floodplain as dangerous and constantly flooding as the confluence of the Missouri River and Mississippi River you'd want to build with something more substantial than dirt.

Though personally, I suspect the mounds may just be a safe place to retreat during flooding. Even in modern times the river delta gets wrecked by floods periodically, despite modern engineering to prevent it.

On another note: in the artist interpretations the grass of the mounds is always even and freshly mowed. Does anyone know how people cut grass back in the old days? Especially within the mainstream paradigm. How the hell do you cut even grass without metal? Southern Illinois is a humid sub-tropical climate designation, the grass there can go full wilderness over the course of a few weeks of rain and sun.

Sheep are the best lawnmowers known to man!

 

[ProfessorHotStuff]

Sheep are the best lawnmowers known to man!

According to the mainstream, there were no domestic sheep in the Americas. Apparently American Indians didn't do any shepherding until the 1500s. Must have been a lot of tall grass before then.

 

[Otto_Didactic]

The mounds ain't real. The Smithsonian wasn't intentionally erasing a precolumbian culture, they were hiding direct evidence that there were no Indians here. The Earth was repopulated, not colonized. Meaning Chicago was already there, there was no Louis and Clark expedition, no Pilgrims...
This is the Big Mound outside of St Louis, except its not a mound, it at least two layers and probs 3. You can see a defining vein about halfway and color change. I chose this image bc it was first in my drive but its by no means the only.

Heres Cohokia in 1892, you can see theres no goats. Trees though.

Heres an Image of St Louis post civil War, its a mudflood city that was excavated. I believe the 'Indian' mounds are excavation substrate that is arranged in certain order to give the illusion of an extinct primative ppl, I mean there has to be something to support the bullshit we get like the first thanksgiving fable. No Pilgrims or Indians, turkeyday is a psychological warfare operation. bet me.

This is an 'Indian artifact'. Except its junk some rich brat made up in art school at Ohio State. You sigil interpreters will love it. The windmill swazzie in the center, the raccoon bc he is the masked bandit, the trickster. One-Eye symbolism coming from the twins. The Circle and Cross. The one leg lifted in the 'Capt Morgan' pose.

Heres another with the three arm spiral. The same piece is called the Dharmachakra in Buddhism. The same art fags write all 'ancient' culture scripts ad regurgitate the same imagery.

The double headed eagle, popular in Russia and Free masonry

If you ever look at the original excavation photos will see how bogus they are. Most sites were dug by the Conservation Civilian Corp, the Works Progress Association bitch slave labor pool from the New Deal, they traveled around America razing olde artifacts like starforts and canals and ascribing fake history to others. Look at this one, its a couple rocks but written up as some bs narrative but they think nobody will ever look which is true, I have to reach out to State and University archives for access

The gatekeepers are stuck in a position where they constantly have to one-up themselves so before long we get the 8 ft red haired giants with horns. its funny once you get past the lifetime of conditioning.

The first page of the first scientific paper says it was sponsored by the War Dept, just like all the first Indian portraits were painted by the War Dept of 'visiting tribal dignitaries' lol, sure. They were all done by the War Dept bc it is psychological war on the Orphan Class. There were no indians and sure as heck no 8 ft horned Gingers.

Take the link here, it connects to more mound builders and other fake ancient sites. We didn't even get to talk about the institutes and characters that did the digging.
Most collections were made by the same entities that were involved with the modern hoax unesco sites like Chaco Canyon and Mesa Verde Cliff Dwellers and were put on display at the World Fairs. The W.F.'s are where the scripted history vultures, im mean cultures, are inserted into the narrative as authentic history

 

[freemaster]

View attachment 30691​

The mounds ain't real. The Smithsonian wasn't intentionally erasing a precolumbian culture, they were hiding direct evidence that there were no Indians here. The Earth was repopulated, not colonized. Meaning Chicago was already there, there was no Louis and Clark expedition, no Pilgrims...
This is the Big Mound outside of St Louis, except its not a mound, it at least two layers and probs 3. You can see a defining vein about halfway and color change. I chose this image bc it was first in my drive but its by no means the only.

View attachment 30692​

Heres Cohokia in 1892, you can see theres no goats. Trees though.

View attachment 30693​

Heres an Image of St Louis post civil War, its a mudflood city that was excavated. I believe the 'Indian' mounds are excavation substrate that is arranged in certain order to give the illusion of an extinct primative ppl, I mean there has to be something to support the bullshit we get like the first thanksgiving fable. No Pilgrims or Indians, turkeyday is a psychological warfare operation. bet me.

View attachment 30694​

This is an 'Indian artifact'. Except its junk some rich brat made up in art school at Ohio State. You sigil interpreters will love it. The windmill swazzie in the center, the raccoon bc he is the masked bandit, the trickster. One-Eye symbolism coming from the twins. The Circle and Cross. The one leg lifted in the 'Capt Morgan' pose.

View attachment 30695​

Heres another with the three arm spiral. The same piece is called the Dharmachakra in Buddhism. The same art fags write all 'ancient' culture scripts ad regurgitate the same imagery.

View attachment 30696​

The double headed eagle, popular in Russia and Free masonry

If you ever look at the original excavation photos will see how bogus they are. Most sites were dug by the Conservation Civilian Corp, the Works Progress Association bitch slave labor pool from the New Deal, they traveled around America razing olde artifacts like starforts and canals and ascribing fake history to others. Look at this one, its a couple rocks but written up as some bs narrative but they think nobody will ever look which is true, I have to reach out to State and University archives for access

View attachment 30697​

View attachment 30699​

The gatekeepers are stuck in a position where they constantly have to one-up themselves so before long we get the 8 ft red haired giants with horns. its funny once you get past the lifetime of conditioning.

View attachment 30700​

The first page of the first scientific paper says it was sponsored by the War Dept, just like all the first Indian portraits were painted by the War Dept of 'visiting tribal dignitaries' lol, sure. They were all done by the War Dept bc it is psychological war on the Orphan Class. There were no indians and sure as heck no 8 ft horned Gingers.

Take the link here, it connects to more mound builders and other fake ancient sites. We didn't even get to talk about the institutes and characters that did the digging.
Most collections were made by the same entities that were involved with the modern hoax unesco sites like Chaco Canyon and Mesa Verde Cliff Dwellers and were put on display at the World Fairs. The W.F.'s are where the scripted history vultures, im mean cultures, are inserted into the narrative as authentic history

View attachment 30701​

I am intrigued by the theory that there were no Indians and that it is a cover up for the reset and what not. . . Buttt... I do a lot of boots on the ground and artifact hunting. I am outside most of the time and have always been like that. I have pulled arrowheads and flint tools exquisitely made from 5 different regions in North America. My direct experience tells me there were indeed masters who hunted with stone tools for a long time. It doesn't seem plausible at all that stone artifacts have been planted and layered throughout all the dirt across the continent.

Nonetheless, I am baffled and do not have a working theory for how Native cultures were involved with the ancient infrastructure that has been reclaimed the past 100/200 years. I don't buy the Rockefeller History Book timeline, but I also believe there were tribal peoples living as hunter gatherers. I am open to ideas from anyone who also puzzles over this.. Thanks!