SH Archive Nuclear Weapons: do they exist or not?

[Magnetic]

Nuclear weapons as enumerated by the technocratic leadership class do not exist as physical weapons, but as psychological fear propaganda. The same could be said of the Covid scare as no virus from the sick has been isolated and presented as proof. One does not have to posit what is actually going on in the A blasts simulations to prove that A bombs do not exist, although there were videos of tests using dynamite in vast piles to "simulate" the Atomic bomb blast. Compartmentalization used in intelligence operations made sure that virtually no one who worked on these projects had the entire picture of the project. It was a very successful psyop and mind control narrative which enriched the deep state actors greatly. The careful dissection of the original A bomb project in America, the Soviet Union and the Red Chinese show that the fakery was not well done due to technical media problems especially in the communist countries. It has laughably bad movie making and visual effects. The two different types of bombs using vastly different technology presented by the Manhattan Project(Edward Bernays, Freud's cousin and the innovator of mass advertising and propaganda was based in Manhattan hence the name for the project) which myself an engineer would never be done in a new development of technology. One would settle on a single path that works before investing vast resources and time on multiple lines of research such as presented. The first bomb violated atomic radius force rules. It is much easier to disprove a thing in scientific methodology than to prove a thing. Personal stories told to others are not proofs of anything.

 

[asatiger1966]

This lines up good with my theory, that the nuclear weapons hoax was really just to demonize the basically free unlimited energy produced by nuclear power plants.

Radium, uranium, and other natural occurring substances are banned entirely in my opinion for oil and natural gas alternatives. You can search radium on this site and will find some good info about it's demonization early 20th century.

Its possible he was not lying to you, his specialty was power generation though. Surely he knew all the chemistry for the substances, mechanical engineering of the engine, the steam system involved, all the parts for that system to function etc; that doesn't mean he wasn't shown the same production video every other enlisted G.I. is shown, probably sat through several presentations/lectures, talked about the dangers. His specialty was not in the application of igniting a 10,000 lb bomb in such a manner to cause explosions = to 20,000 tons of TNT.

I appreciate you taking the time to respond. One question during your time serving any mining regions come to mind you know of?

Explain, what minerals are you interested about? Yes, I personally visited a few mining operations as an explosive expert, another name for a lucky person, Army and DuPont Schools.

 

[Justtheg]

Explain, what minerals are you interested about? Yes, I personally visited a few mining operations as an explosive expert, another name for a lucky person, Army and DuPont Schools.

Gneiss, skarn, alkaline syenite, mafic alkaline rocks, alkaline granite, cretaceous granitic pluton, marble, schist, calc-silicate metasediments, granite, uranium tails, sandstone.

 

[asatiger1966]

Gneiss, skarn, alkaline syenite, mafic alkaline rocks, alkaline granite, cretaceous granitic pluton, marble, schist, calc-silicate metasediments, granite, uranium tails, sandstone.

Any mining regions would be listed, we have a lot of open pit mining in America. The minerals you listed could make anything from a countertop to a Pyramid for power. What are you looking for?

 

[Justtheg]

Explain, what minerals are you interested about? Yes, I personally visited a few mining operations as an explosive expert, another name for a lucky person, Army and DuPont Schools.

Any mining regions would be listed, we have a lot of open pit mining in America. The minerals you listed could make anything from a countertop to a Pyramid for power. What are you looking for?

Radium

 

[asatiger1966]

Radium

I would think that finding uranium deposits one could refine it into radium

 

[Akanah]

I can only point out that nuclear clouds actually have great similarities with plasma discharges.
I even wonder if the petroglyphs on cave walls that the Thunderboltsproject has analyzed really tell of an unknown plasma event or of a man-made plasma disaster. The largest tree ever grown, named Yggdrassil, also fits this pattern.
The 9 worlds of the tree are the 9 diocotron radiation rings that such a plasma discharge can form.
Tolkien's Lord of the Rings with the 9 Ringwraiths is also a reference to this and Lord of the Rings is said to have been about World War 1.
There may not be any real nuclear weapons today, but there was once a plasma disaster that was man-made (perhaps by the Hindenburg disaster)... no atomic bomb but a zeppelin.
And I therefore believe that it was man-made, because I do not believe in a natural plasma ejecting sun in a biological universe.
It's time to investigate this further, but whenever I try to open a thread about WW1 and plasma catastrophe, it doesn't get published.
Does anyone have a big problem with this ?

 

[busy.baci]

"The biggest and the most terrifying nuke explosions I've seen in my life were on TV."

(Busy Baçi)​

​

Hello folks. Many moons ago I was wondering about nuclear weapons and their power. How do they work? How did (they) made those? Who tested them? How powerful these bombs are? etc etc
While researching about these topics on internet I came across a book which completely dismantled the mystery of atomic bombs as a hoax. The book I've read is "Death Object-Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax" by Akio Nakatami.

Now, I'm not going to explain in detail the (why) nukes are fake or spoil the reasoning and logic behind this claim. You should read the book for yourself if you are interested in this topic. Suffice is to say that the official story of the atomic bomb's creation and practical use, has way too many fallacies and incongruencies that should not have been is such high number in the first place. The whole story of it is fishy and not credible with the facts provided by History itself.

If I was to make an atomic bomb and be the first one to have it, and also supposing that I have strong geo-political, ideological and economical adversaries. What would had restricted me from using such an awesome tactical weapon to my own advantage against my enemies multiple times? Again and again.
I'm not a rainbow pacifist by the way.

I guess nothing, not even morals or human rights would have stopped my from using it, if I had the luck to be the first one to have this power and weld it at my pleasure. That would have been a 1 in a million chance and a very unique one to have the luxury of not being used.
I would have turn the countries that are adversaries to mine into ash. They would have been regressed into the stone age and I with my armies would have taken the resources of their lands and export democracy or what ever they promote it to be.

There will be not enemies any more, bothering me with stupid negotiations or international dialog. There will be no need for UN or what ever other international organizations which would put restrictions on my Will to Power. I will be the king of planet Earth.

Unfortunately, these power grab world dominating fantasies that I described are not really mine. These are fantasies and ways of thinking of people who are in charge of Super Power nations. Nothing would refrain them from using Weapons of Mass Destruction if they had such terrifying capabilities.

If only they had the nukes....

Enjoy reading this book, it's a mind opening and an easy read.

 

[dreamtime]

Here's the book: https://fakeologist.com/wp-content/...the-Nuclear-Weapons-Hoax-by-Akio-Nakatani.pdf

 

[busy.baci]

book about nuke

Edit: Why the PDF book I attached to this comment doesn't show up if people here care so much about thread continuity????

 

[Francis_Sansom]

NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE A HOAX
by Omar Jordan

NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE A HOAX

 

[busy.baci]

Here's another

That's exactly the book that I was mentioning and attached to my comment. But it doesn't show up.

What is this site? Is it a pay-per-post kind of forum? Do I really have to buy my way in in order to post a helpful book? What are these "Trusted members"? Do they pay on Paypal to Stolen History to get that badge so they could be deemed "Trustworthy"? What about members who don't pay? Are they deemed untrustful???

I signed up on this forum just so I could read Corben Dallas's post, that's it. The rest of the threads are sub-par and redundant to him. Nothing new under the sun even here.

 

[Jd755]

That's exactly the book that I was mentioning and attached to my comment. But it doesn't show up.

What is this site? Is it a pay-per-post kind of forum? Do I really have to buy my way in in order to post a helpful book? What are these "Trusted members"? Do they pay on Paypal to Stolen History to get that badge so they could be deemed "Trustworthy"? What about members who don't pay? Are they deemed untrustful???

I signed up on this forum just so I could read Corben Dallas's post, that's it. The rest of the threads are sub-par and redundant to him. Nothing new under the sun even here.

Or you could just wait for the mod who closed your thread and with it went my post pointing out you should use the search function and it seems the pdf book you were keen to have on the site, to explain why things went the way they did.
As for your range of questions dear me.
I have never contributed a brass fasrthing to the chaps who run the site and frankly your pay for posting remarks are not in the least bit justified.
As for the labels it seems to work on the number of posts made I don't know for sure but that metric is the thing that triggers the label change.

If the rest of the threads were sub par in your estimation then perhaps you would be better downloading the archive then you could read korbens posts at your leisure without suffering. Or you could go to stolenhisdtory.org and enjoy korbens efforts completely free of the sub par content that you feel clouds this site.

 

[dreamtime]

Edit: Why the PDF book I attached to this comment doesn't show up if people here care so much about thread continuity????

You didn't include it likely, PDF uploads should work. You also deleted your own thread. I will move it here.

 

[busy.baci]

You didn't include it likely, PDF uploads should work. You also deleted your own thread. I will move it here.

I did attache my PDF twice. First in my thread and again in my above post. It didn't show up, I'm not lying. If uploading ISBN PDF books in this site is a violation of copyright ownership, that's another thing.

If the rest of the threads were sub par in your estimation then perhaps you would be better downloading the archive then you could read korbens posts at your leisure without suffering. Or you could go to stolenhisdtory.org and enjoy korbens efforts completely free of the sub par content that you feel clouds this site.

I'm going to do exactly that. Thank you for the advice.

 

[dreamtime]

It didn't show up, I'm not lying.

Okay. If that's the case, then it's probably a technical error. Or some permission limit, but I am not aware of permissions related to attachment uploads.

 

[iseidon]

Recently, the Unofficial History channel posted a video (article in Russian on tart-aria) which argues that the combined forces of Africa and Australia (which have nothing to do with the current states in those territories) launched nuclear strikes against Northern Eurasia and North America. And then they were hit back.

UPD. It was (according to the author) 180 years ago (±20 years).

The author justifies his opinion by the fact that each uranium deposit on Earth has its own characteristic features (like a person's fingerprints). Based on the data from this map, he suggests that uranium from Namibia, Congo and Australia could get to the territory of Northern Eurasia and North America only by nuclear attack.

Maybe someone will find this map (in pdf format) interesting. I found it curious that there are deposits near Dalmatovo (rus), Russia and Kirovograd (rus), Ukraine. Perhaps someone will see more connections to the star forts, monasteries and other potential targets

World Distribution of Uranium Deposits | IAEA

 

[busy.baci]

Recently, the Unofficial History channel posted a video (article in Russian on tart-aria) which argues that the combined forces of Africa and Australia (which have nothing to do with the current states in those territories) launched nuclear strikes against Northern Eurasia and North America. And then they were hit back.

The author justifies his opinion by the fact that each uranium deposit on Earth has its own characteristic features (like a person's fingerprints). Based on the data from this map, he suggests that uranium from Namibia, Congo and Australia could get to the territory of Northern Eurasia and North America only by nuclear attack.

Maybe someone will find this map (in pdf format) interesting. I found it curious that there are deposits near Dalmatovo (rus), Russia and Kirovograd (rus), Ukraine. Perhaps someone will see more connections to the star forts and monasteries.

World Distribution of Uranium Deposits | IAEA

The article you mentioned implies that nuclear exploding devices do exist and the lovely chain reaction that Fermi and company promoted as the mother of all bombs is true. I did learn about Uranium (U235) enrichment into Plutonium (U239) since when I was 16 years old and the whole process on how the chain reaction takes place.
You can only imagine my disappointment when I learned in 2016 that the whole thing is a hoax. They just can't make the critical mass of Plutonium to start the nuclear fire and to maintain it long enough in the milliseconds time window range for the Neutron shower cascade to take place and sustain the chain reaction. Because the heat generated initially splits the critical mass and creates enormous exploding pressure which makes the plutonium mass to gets scattered and the reactions ends there.

The scars on the terrain shown in the photos might be caused by some other type of weaponry, the earth looks like it was carped bombed and it looks like it was attacked from above, with a directional angle to it.
I don't know, but some other kind of weaponry might have been used and It's not kinetic because there is no dirt displacement, it's just craters. It looks like the earth which was hit did evaporate, leading me to think about Direct Energy Weapons.

 

[iseidon]

I think it doesn't matter what kind of weapons are used (nuclear or non-nuclear). The devastation from such (in terms of power) explosions would be enormous.

Is it possible to believe that any celestial body was so lucky (in terms of hit accuracy) to fall on Chelyabinsk? It was so fortunate that the largest impact (the First Lake) fell on the area near where the tank (tractor) plant is located.

Now (in current historical times), Chelyabinsk is one of the largest metallurgical centers in Russia (most likely it was before).

Apparently, the blow was struck from the west, which fits into the version that Pugachev's uprising was a war of Russia against a notional Tartaria.

 

[Akanah]

Such water-filled "bomb craters" could also come from natural methane gas explosions. Near the earth's surface there is methane which reacts explosively with oxygen when escaping. Since methane is unstable in air, it reacts quickly with oxygen to form CO2 and water. The freshly formed water then fills the crater.
I had once the assumption that the so-called volcano-mare in the Eifel of Germany could have originated in such a way. It is also not untypical that there are many such craters in Russia, because there is a lot of trapped methane.