SH Archive Nuclear Weapons: do they exist or not?

SH.org OP Username
KorbenDallas
SH.org OP Date
2018-11-26 00:41:42
SH.org Reaction Score
175
SH.org Reply Count
19
Nuclear bomb never looked real to me sense I was kid. Was fascinated read the 11 pages of comments and I’d like to say thank you to @Magnetic to share “China's First Nuclear Weapons Test”, somehow, I never come across this masterpiece, the horse with mask is hilarious.

vlcsnap-02724.jpg

666 everywhere to confirm the hoax made by the usual suspects.

vlcsnap-02715.jpg

Bozo pretends be Chinese. Probably he knew 10 Chinese words maximum but could speak perfect English with all his friends.


vlcsnap-02716.jpg
After sailor moon dancer its phallic time with dedicate soldiers give a hand on modern vibrator available all size.

vlcsnap-02719.jpg

Only 2 glasses available, the other guys will be fine.

vlcsnap-02727.jpg
vlcsnap-02730.jpg

666 we love 666
vlcsnap-02737.jpg

Filming the Sun and pretend is a explosion.

vlcsnap-02739.jpg

Quick cut to a regular TNT explosion
vlcsnap-02740.jpg

Diorama and the cables hanging the roof
vlcsnap-02662.jpg

green scream nonsense
vlcsnap-02674.jpg

Cowboy or Knight or both mixed, attacking the radiation

vlcsnap-02702.jpg
 
Oh yeah, it's well known among the right circles.

No, the planes (If they were there, which I doubt, but not important to the true story, only that people thought they were) did not contain any weapons, but many people were meant to think they did. There was one at the other site though, which although intentionally disabled, was meant to further convince that there were 2 additional devices lodged 1200 or so feet above our biggest city. I could even tell you what specific devices they were, and where they came from, but it's better for you to discover on your own. The devices that were called into service that day, have been there since the late 70s.

Look, I'm not gonna pull the pics and show it all, but all of the evidence is there. I've said more than I really want to already. There are certain words used in the news and in wiki that are signals to those in those circles, to know the type of device. There are extortion and power plays involved at the highest levels.

Just look at any location referred to as ground zero. Ground zero only had ONE definition prior to 2001. Where you find a ground zero, you find the location of a nuke blast.

Don't trust the dictionary either, they've been reprinted and swapped out, but if you have an old one, printed (as in YOU purchased it or had it in your possession, not just a copywriter date, almost all libraries have already been swapped) PRIOR to 2001, check the definition of ground zero. There is ONLY one definition, prior to 2001. Ground zero is one of those key words to signal those in the know.

Check the evidence, the burn patterns of victims, the burn patterns of the surroundings, the witness reports, the ongoing responder damage (victims fund anyone? Insane, rates of radiation caused cancers, orders of magnitude above the general population). Look at the decontamination procedures put into place on site, and the agencies responsible.

Look at what previous devices did to the same or similar structures, and calculate how much fertilizer it would have taken (even if purified, we are talking hundreds of tons to do the damage shown).

Once you understand the differences in the effects between conventional and otherwise, and look at the evidence carefully, you will see that there can be no other answer.

I'm sure you have some questions, that you believe would refute this hypothesis, and I likely will not answer them here, but suffice to say, they are answers, technical, specific answers, which answer those questions. Look into it with an open mind, and I am sure you will find the pieces fit together like a wall at machu pichu.

The NY one was different from the others for a variety of reasons, but once you start to see the signs, you can not look at these events and Not see it.
How about at least explaining why you won't be specific. This ' I've said too much already!' is actually ridiculous
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah, it's well known among the right circles.

No, the planes (If they were there, which I doubt, but not important to the true story, only that people thought they were) did not contain any weapons, but many people were meant to think they did. There was one at the other site though, which although intentionally disabled, was meant to further convince that there were 2 additional devices lodged 1200 or so feet above our biggest city. I could even tell you what specific devices they were, and where they came from, but it's better for you to discover on your own. The devices that were called into service that day, have been there since the late 70s.

Look, I'm not gonna pull the pics and show it all, but all of the evidence is there. I've said more than I really want to already. There are certain words used in the news and in wiki that are signals to those in those circles, to know the type of device. There are extortion and power plays involved at the highest levels.

Just look at any location referred to as ground zero. Ground zero only had ONE definition prior to 2001. Where you find a ground zero, you find the location of a nuke blast.

Don't trust the dictionary either, they've been reprinted and swapped out, but if you have an old one, printed (as in YOU purchased it or had it in your possession, not just a copywriter date, almost all libraries have already been swapped) PRIOR to 2001, check the definition of ground zero. There is ONLY one definition, prior to 2001. Ground zero is one of those key words to signal those in the know.

Check the evidence, the burn patterns of victims, the burn patterns of the surroundings, the witness reports, the ongoing responder damage (victims fund anyone? Insane, rates of radiation caused cancers, orders of magnitude above the general population). Look at the decontamination procedures put into place on site, and the agencies responsible.

Look at what previous devices did to the same or similar structures, and calculate how much fertilizer it would have taken (even if purified, we are talking hundreds of tons to do the damage shown).

Once you understand the differences in the effects between conventional and otherwise, and look at the evidence carefully, you will see that there can be no other answer.

I'm sure you have some questions, that you believe would refute this hypothesis, and I likely will not answer them here, but suffice to say, they are answers, technical, specific answers, which answer those questions. Look into it with an open mind, and I am sure you will find the pieces fit together like a wall at machu pichu.

The NY one was different from the others for a variety of reasons, but once you start to see the signs, you can not look at these events and Not see it.
Also, I'm not saying you're not correct, or that you don't have info the rest of us don't, but can you explain why all three bldgs appeared to fall exactly like a controlled demolition?
 
Also, I'm not saying you're not correct, or that you don't have info the rest of us don't, but can you explain why all three bldgs appeared to fall exactly like a controlled demolition?
I made it halfway through this thread, which is great btw, and realized how utterly irrelevant it is whether nukes are real or not.....

God what a relief.....

We could discuss this forever, and it wouldn't get us any closer to the truths that matter, like who the f*ck is running the show. There aren't any nations or groups in conflict or fighting for supremacy.....there is only one group using nations and peoples as pawns to achieve whatever goal they have for this 'planet'.....presumably it's simply total control or plain old fashion evil ie pain suffering loosh yada yada yada....

Wake up sheeple!.....kidding, I don't even care anymore
 
No Russia not directly involved, but another country is, that you wouldn't expect. Their are VERY good reasons why Russia will keep the secret though, they are in tough spot on that one.

The treaties allow for civil devices of up to a certain yield, without international notification, iirc.

It actually could be a very intersting case study for our changing history studies. Dictionaries were changed as a direct result of 911. Even more interesting is that older dictionaries were reprinted and back dated and swapped out of libraries etc. Furthermore, there is absolute proof that this is the case. I believe there is a book forthcoming, just about the dictionary aspect.


No Russia not directly involved, but another country is, that you wouldn't expect. Their are VERY good reasons why Russia will keep the secret though, they are in tough spot on that one.

The treaties allow for civil devices of up to a certain yield, without international notification, iirc.

It actually could be a very intersting case study for our changing history studies. Dictionaries were changed as a direct result of 911. Even more interesting is that older dictionaries were reprinted and back dated and swapped out of libraries etc. Furthermore, there is absolute proof that this is the case. I believe there is a book forthcoming, just about the dictionary aspect.

What other country? Also, any crumbs of proof ie the dictionary swapout? (I realize this is archived and don't expect a response) And as always while I agree this is a juicy subject, the devil is in the details.....it's the big picture that matters. SH is great, but it's so easy to get lost in the reverie of imagining what true history is....why does this topic matter?
 
Oh yeah, it's well known among the right circles.

No, the planes (If they were there, which I doubt, but not important to the true story, only that people thought they were) did not contain any weapons, but many people were meant to think they did. There was one at the other site though, which although intentionally disabled, was meant to further convince that there were 2 additional devices lodged 1200 or so feet above our biggest city. I could even tell you what specific devices they were, and where they came from, but it's better for you to discover on your own. The devices that were called into service that day, have been there since the late 70s.

Look, I'm not gonna pull the pics and show it all, but all of the evidence is there. I've said more than I really want to already. There are certain words used in the news and in wiki that are signals to those in those circles, to know the type of device. There are extortion and power plays involved at the highest levels.

Just look at any location referred to as ground zero. Ground zero only had ONE definition prior to 2001. Where you find a ground zero, you find the location of a nuke blast.

Don't trust the dictionary either, they've been reprinted and swapped out, but if you have an old one, printed (as in YOU purchased it or had it in your possession, not just a copywriter date, almost all libraries have already been swapped) PRIOR to 2001, check the definition of ground zero. There is ONLY one definition, prior to 2001. Ground zero is one of those key words to signal those in the know.

Check the evidence, the burn patterns of victims, the burn patterns of the surroundings, the witness reports, the ongoing responder damage (victims fund anyone? Insane, rates of radiation caused cancers, orders of magnitude above the general population). Look at the decontamination procedures put into place on site, and the agencies responsible.

Look at what previous devices did to the same or similar structures, and calculate how much fertilizer it would have taken (even if purified, we are talking hundreds of tons to do the damage shown).

Once you understand the differences in the effects between conventional and otherwise, and look at the evidence carefully, you will see that there can be no other answer.

I'm sure you have some questions, that you believe would refute this hypothesis, and I likely will not answer them here, but suffice to say, they are answers, technical, specific answers, which answer those questions. Look into it with an open mind, and I am sure you will find the pieces fit together like a wall at machu pichu.

The NY one was different from the others for a variety of reasons, but once you start to see the signs, you can not look at these events and Not see it.
Honestly, this is AI right? I feel like I can see it so much better now than when I first read this post. If not it's nice to meet you Mr Bond. Martini?
Ps Grav, this the thread I was talking about...
 
Last edited:
1290 Papal Bull “Unam Sanctam”

“Every human creature is subject to the Roman Pontiff.”

anywhere the pope does not control is smeared as an exclusion zone
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top