Interesting for sure. I don't think it is conclusive of anything. I could easily believe M curie was a complete fabrication. I don't think that invalidates nuclear physics. I'm pretty sure radium exists, I have tested for it many times (indirectly, with a gross alpha test). We have a lot of uranium in our soil, albeit in very low concentrations, so many homes have radon issues.
Nuke power is very efficient, which is why I suspect the constant railing against it. It can also be incredibly safe and have minimal to no waste in a properly designed reactor. I'm partial to LFTR as it makes use of existing waste streams for rare earths and has several fail-safes by nature of it's function.
Nuclear power is not that efficient-it is basically a steam engine that drives a turbine. It can theoretically be 47% but in reality is closer to 35%. Any engine that operates higher than 300 degrees celsius will be more efficient than nuclear. Carnot’s Perfect Heat Engine: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Restated | Physics
You still get almost 300% lifetime efficiency with conventional nuclear power and that's without something like a LFTR that utilizes existing waste streams. The generation itself isn't terribly efficient, but as a system it's hard to beat. Wind, hydro, and geothermal outrank it. Lifetime on solar is below nuclear as well. Nuclear plants have some other perks like consistent output, placement flexibility, and footprint. I don't think they're ideal, but they're an important stepping stone.
Its funny... that we all know that we've been lied to yet nuclear power is a given that its true (as above). The test to determine whether one has radon in your property ( i live in Cornwall, England, and its a given I'm breathing it in everyday) is with a detector that has mercury as the reactor in it, hmmm. So we all grew up with fear mongering propagana of nuclear annihilation, (duck and cover, under a wooden table) 50,000 year half life of an isotope yet the cities in Japan that were supposedly nuked are thriving. No mention of the lingering, invisible terror of radiation. Lets move forward to Chernobyl, a place of lush vegetation interspersed with decaying buildings that if one wants to can take a sightseeing trip of... hmmm. Alittle nearer our present time and Fukishima. No news is good news. Tepco must have it sorted. Man and woman back on the land, fishing ago-go.... hmmm
Lets nail down the processes which you wish to compare. Then let's nail down the methodology.
Never heard of a mercury test. They use various configurations of charcoal for passive tests, or a film that gets scratched by alpha particles. The active monitors use some sort of film that, upon being struck by an alpha particle, it alters the voltage read through the film. I've used mostly the active ones. They actually have a light on them that flashes every time an alpha particle hits the sensor. They have to be calibrated by the laboratory at least once per year.
Efficiency is a scientific term that means the amount of energy from an engine that can be turned into work, a usable amount of power. It is a steam engine. It has a certain maximum efficiency based on the temperature differential of the environment and the operating temperature of the engine. If you want to talk about something else fine but the efficiency of the nuclear steam engine is 47% theoretically and practically is about 35%. Two-thirds of the energy is wasted and that is why they have to have rivers, lakes or cooling ponds or seas to get rid of this waste heat. I have certain reservations about what is actually going on in a "nuclear power plant" and tend to think it's not what we are told like every thing else.
Thermonuclear weapons are one of the deep state's favorite weapons. Indeed, they were the primary demolition devices used to destroy WTC 1, 2, and 7 on 9/11. I feel like this "nukes don't exist" meme is an effort to conceal this fact.
In a Nuke plant it is two loops. It is the temperature differential between them, not ambient, although that is really nit picky.
Yep, totally accurate, as far as I'm concerned, and it's clear as day once you know what to look for. They get used much more often than we know.
So where was the flash of the nuke going off? Where was the mighty winds that would have propelled the debris away from the site instead of falling down on its foot print? What happened there defies all of their own "nuclear" bomb propaganda.
It would take a few hundred pages to explain all of this to you in detail. In short, the devices were about 50 meters below the bedrock. Where they have been (more or less, again, severely truncated explanation) since 1977/8.
They were subterranean detonation, not atmospheric. Here's what that looks like:
No Russia not directly involved, but another country is, that you wouldn't expect. Their are VERY good reasons why Russia will keep the secret though, they are in tough spot on that one.
I did see a few years back that Jared Leto has purchased one of these nuclear testing propaganda sites.
That's because there was virtually no radioactive contamination there.
The defenders of the nuclear bomb hoaxes just don't get it. Here is another video exposing the first nuclear bomb hoax "Trinity"(don't you love it when the parasites profane Christianity with their names).
Remember nuclear bombs ARE REAL! Here is a test of the first nuclear bomb by the Chinese communists. Remember this is real and not just acting and film trickery. It's entertaining though, go to the middle of the video to see the test and what they do. It's hilarious.
I'll believe it when I see it... LOL!
as far as I can tell, the trinity concept predates christianity. Isis, Horis, and Set are one example. Ive also heard mention that me, myself and I are not one single/same life but parts of the trinity of One mind. (the christ consciousness?)
Not sure about the weapons, but radiation exists, though it is mostly harmless, even beneficial in lower doses.
Would you share some of your opinions? i find this interesting.
