SH Archive Obelisks Plus: Cleopatra's Needle. Journey to London.

SH.org OP Username
KorbenDallas
SH.org OP Date
2019-11-29 01:31:30
SH.org Reaction Score
7
SH.org Reply Count
15

KD Archive

Not actually KorbenDallas
Active Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2020
Messages
4,691
Reaction score
1,500
NOTE: Even with the technology available in 2005, when Italy agreed to repatriate the Obelisk of Axum, it had to be cut into three pieces and flown in three trips to Ethiopia. The obelisk only weighed 160 tonnes.


In ancient Rome, the transportation of obelisks was not just a practical task. Rather, it was testament to Rome’s mastery over both the manmade and the natural, an accomplishment worthy of celebration. According to Pliny the Elder, obelisk ships were put on display and heralded as “more miraculous than anything else on the sea.”

KD: My original plan was to write a small something on the endeavors they had to undertake while transporting one of the Cleopatra's Needles to London. In the process, the OP acquired some additional info.

Cleopatra's Needle
Cleopatra's Needle is the popular name for each of three Ancient Egyptian obelisks re-erected in London, Paris, and New York City during the nineteenth century. The obelisks in London and New York are a pair; the one in Paris is also part of a pair originally from a different site in Luxor, where its twin remains.

needles.jpg
Although all three needles are genuine Ancient Egyptian obelisks, their shared nickname is a misnomer, as they have no connection with the Ptolemaic Queen Cleopatra VII of Egypt and were already over a thousand years old in her lifetime. An earlier reference states Queen Cleopatra brought the London obelisk from Heliopolis to Alexandria shortly before the time of Christ for the purpose of decorating a new temple but it was never erected and lay buried in sand on the shore until presented to the British nation in 1819.

The London Needle
The London needle is in the City of Westminster, on the Victoria Embankment near the Golden Jubilee Bridges. It was originally erected in the Egyptian city of Heliopolis on the orders of Thutmose III, around 1450 BC. In 1819, Muhammad Ali Pasha gave Britain the obelisk as a gift. However, Britain's prime minister at the time, Robert Jenkinson, hesitated on having it brought to the country due to shipping expenses. It remained in Alexandria until October 1877 when its transport to London was funded by William James Erasmus Wilson.
  • Gifted: 1819
  • Transported: 1877
  • Weight: 224 short tons (203,000 kg)
  • Height: 21 metres (69 ft) high
  • Material: red granite
london.jpg

The New York Needle
The New York City needle was erected in Central Park, just west of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, on 22 January 1881. It was secured in May 1877 by judge Elbert E. Farman, the then-United States Consul General at Cairo, as a gift from the Khedive, Muhammad Ali Pasha, for the United States remaining a friendly neutral as the European powers - France and Britain - maneuvered to secure political control of the Egyptian Government.
  • Secured: 1877
  • Erected: 1881
  • Weight: 200 tons
  • Height: 21 metres (69 ft)
  • Material: red granite
The formidable task of moving the obelisk from Alexandria to New York was given to Henry Honychurch Gorringe, a lieutenant commander on leave from the U.S. Navy. The 200-ton granite obelisk was first shifted from vertical to horizontal, nearly crashing to ground in the process. In August 1879 the movement process was suspended for two months because of local protests and legal challenges. Once those were resolved, the obelisk was transported seven miles to Alexandria and then put into the hold of the steamship SS Dessoug, which set sail 12 June 1880. The Dessoug was heavily modified with a large hole cut into the starboard side of its bow. The obelisk was loaded through the ship's hull by rolling it upon cannonballs.

nyc-obelisk.jpg
Source

On the right: Is this a photograph, or a drawing?
Cleopatra_needle_loading-1.jpg
Source +1

onboard.JPG
Source

Prior to being loaded onto ship "Dessoug"...
usa-obelisk.jpeg
Source

obelisk-in-alexandria-port-loc.jpg
Source

nyc-obelisk-1.jpg
nyc-obelisk-2.jpg
Source

nyc_obelisk.jpg
Source

The Paris/Luxor Needle
The Paris/Luxor needle is in the Place de la Concorde. The centre of the Place is occupied by the giant Egyptian obelisk decorated with hieroglyphs exalting the reign of the pharaoh Ramesses II. Along with its twin (still in situ), it once marked the entrance to the Luxor Temple. The ruler of Egypt and Sudan, Muhammad Ali, presented the New York needle to France in 1828, but it was exchanged in 1830 with the 3,300-year-old Luxor Obelisk. King Louis-Philippe had it placed in the centre of Place de la Concorde in 1833 near the spot where Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette had been guillotined in 1793. Given the technical limitations of the day, transporting it was difficult – on the pedestal are diagrams explaining the machinery used for its transportation. The red granite column rises 23 metres high, including the base, and weighs over 250 tonnes. Missing its original cap, believed stolen in the 6th century BC, in 1998 the government of France added a goldleafed pyramid cap to the top of the obelisk. The obelisk is flanked by two fountains constructed at the time of its erection on the Place.
  • Gifted: 1830
  • Transported: 1833
  • Erected: 1833/36
  • Weight: 250 metric tons (280 short tons)
  • Height: 23 metres (75.5 ft) high
  • Material: yellow granite
The Paris obelisk was sometimes mistakenly described as "l'Aiguille de Cléopâtre", but the London and New York obelisks pair was referred to as Cleopatra's Needles as early as 1821, suggesting the nickname came from the pair located in Alexandria. However, the Paris obelisk is more often referred to as "the Luxor Obelisk".

The Luxor Obelisk first arrived in Paris on 21 December 1833, having been shipped from Luxor via Alexandria and Cherbourg, and three years later, on 25 October 1836, was moved to the centre of Place de la Concorde by King Louis-Phillipe.
  • It was given to France in exchange for a French mechanical clock.
In August 1832, the French paddle ship Sphinx sailed to Alexandria to rendezvous there with the barge Louqsor, which was to load the Luxor Obelisk and bring it to Paris. Sphinx then towed Louqsor back to France. The ships departed on 1 April 1833 and reached Toulon on 10 May. The ships arrived at Cherbourg on 12 August 1833.

Sphinx_IMG_7024.jpg

After the Obelisk was taken, the mechanical clock provided in exchange was discovered to be faulty, having probably been damaged during transport. The worthless clock still exists to this day in a clocktower in Egypt, and is still not working.

Obelisks of Rome
Well, the transporting of the above three obelisks could be considered child games when compared to what, and when they moved to Rome. The stuff is really mind boggling, especially considering when it was accomplished. Anyways, there we go.

The Lateran Obelisk
Tallest obelisk in Rome, and the largest standing ancient Egyptian obelisk in the world, originally weighing around 455 tons. From the temple of Amun in Karnak, and brought to Alexandria with another obelisk by Constantius II, and brought on its own from there to Rome in 357 to decorate the spina of the Circus Maximus. Found in three pieces in 1587, restored approximately 4 m shorter by Pope Sixtus V, and erected near the Lateran Palace and basilica of San Giovanni in Laterano in 1588 in the place of the equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius, which was moved to the Capitoline Hill. Current version weighs around 330 tons.

The Vatican Obelisk
Originally raised in the Forum Iulium in Alexandria by the prefect Cornelius Gallus on Augustus' orders around 30–28 BC. No hieroglyphs. Brought to Rome by Caligula in 40 for the spina of the Vatican Circus. Relocated by Pope Sixtus V in 1586 using a method devised by Domenico Fontana; the first monumental obelisk raised in the modern period, it is the only obelisk in Rome that has not toppled since Roman times. During the Middle Ages, the gilt ball on top of the obelisk was believed to contain the ashes of Julius Caesar. Fontana later removed the ancient metal ball, now in a Rome museum, that stood atop the obelisk and found only dust.

The Flaminio Obelisk
Originally from Heliopolis. Brought to Rome by Augustus in 10 BC with the Solare obelisk and erected on the spina of the Circus Maximus. Found with the Lateranense obelisk in 1587 in two pieces and erected by Pope Sixtus V in 1589. Sculptures with lion fountains were added to the base in 1818. Weighs around 235 tons.

The Obelisk of Montecitorio
The Obelisk of Montecitorio, also known as Solare, is an ancient Egyptian, red granite obelisk of Psammetichus II (595-589 BC) from Heliopolis. Brought to Rome with the Flaminio Obelisk in 10 BC by the Roman Emperor Augustus to be used as the gnomon of the Solarium Augusti, it is now in the Piazza Montecitorio. It is 21.79 metres (71 ft) high, and 33.97 metres (111 ft) including the base and the globe.

Note: There are a few additional smaller ones you can read about here.
kd_separator.jpg

To understand some of the shenanigans pertaining to these obelisks, you will have to read the linked wiki articles. They are short, but do provide enough interesting info.

Transport to London
I was not planning on putting all of the above together, so I will only present the obelisk which made its way to London in 1878. The London needle's journey is fairly well known and has plenty of pictures. Additionally, using somebody else's research is always easier.

In February 1878 ‘curious sightseers’ cheered from the bridges as they beheld the equally strange spectacle of a 92-feet long, cigar-shaped iron cylinder (dubbed Cleopatra), draped in bunting, bobbing up the river Thames towards the Adelphi Steps at Victoria Embankment. No ‘seeming mermaid’ steered this craft, however, but the hoary sea dog Captain Carter. It’s precious cargo? Cleopatra’s Needle, one of a pair of obelisks erected by Pharaoh Thutmose III in c.1500 BC at Helopolis in Egypt.

westminster_bridge.jpg

The question of transportation was a problem, it was too expensive to transfer by land and the British Government did not want to get involved in any way. The solution proposed by engineer John Dixon was to encase the obelisk in great iron cylinder, 92 feet (28 m) long and 16 feet (4.9 m) in diameter.

needle-ship-11.jpg
Eventually the obelisk was encased in the cylinder and attached to the steamship Olga for its journey to London, all went well until 14th October 1877, when a storm in the Bay of Biscay caused the cylinder to start rolling, The Olga sent out a rescue boat with six crew, but the boat capsized and all six crew were lost. Captain Carter and the five crew members aboard the Cleopatra were eventually rescued, but the cylinder was feared to have sunk. However these fears were unfounded and the cylinder was found and was taken to Ferrol in Spain. Unfortunately this was not the end of the problem because over £2,000 salvage had to be paid before the journey could be continued.

The money was eventually paid and the William Watkins owned paddle tug Anglia (which was also built at Thames Ironworks) departed Millwall to travel to Ferrol to tow the cylinder back to the Thames. Thankfully this journey was without incident and the tug and the cylinder arrived in the Thames estuary on 21 January 1878.

A newspaper report from The Times tells the next part of the story.
  • The Cleopatra with the Alexandrian obelisk on board was safety moored on Monday afternoon in the East India Docks. Every preparation was made for her reception by Mr Aslett, superintendent of the East India Docks ; Sir William Baynes, chairman of the East and West India Dock Company; Captains Marrable and J. Hales Dutton, dock masters; and Colonel du Plat Tayior, secretary of the dock company. It was resolved to give her the ‘railway berth,’ the best in the whole dock, just opposite the superintendent’s office. There was a great crowd at Blackwall, and much enthusiasm was evinced- as the afternoon tide approached high-water point, the time for which, According to the notification at the dock gates, was 3-35. Captain Saxby had foretold that it was to have been a very high tide, but it was much checked by a south-westerly wind. It was said that the Anglia, with the Cleopatra in tow, had left Gravesend at half-past twelve, an announcement which timed out to have been a little premature, as the start thenue was not made until 1. However, not long after the Anglia, with the Needle-ship in her wake, was seen from the Blackwall Railway Pier steadily approaching. She is an iron steam tug of 140 horsepower, and has three funnels, painted black, with a red band in the middle, and hoists a red flag marked W, like all those of the fleet to which she belongs. The fleet numbers a score of these powerful iron vessels, which must not be confounded with ordinary river and coasting tugs, but often make ocean voyages, as far, for instance, as St. Helena. The form of the floating cylinder with parallel pinched ends need not be again described. She is painted buff down to her water-line, and red beneath, carrying two red flags, of which the upper one bears her name ‘Cleopatra,” the lower being a simple British merchant’s ensign. Owing to the number of vessels leaving the docks, it was close upon three before the Anglia and the Cleopatra approached the dock gates, and it was a quarter to 4 before the obelisk ship was within them. By this time the Anglia had resigned her charge to the care of the dock company’s tug Mosquito,which worked the Cleopatra safely and comfortably through the narrow entrance, and saw her to her berth, which, however, was not reached till nearly 5. Meanwhile the crowds continued to swell, and the excitement was very great. Order was admirably preserved, thanks to the arrangements of Captain Sheppey, the superintendent of the East and West India Dock Police.
So the Cleopatra’s Needle’s first home in London was East India Docks until the decision was made where to erect it, The Palace of Westminster, St James Park and the British Museum were some of the suggestions but eventually the Embankment was chosen and well over 100 years later is where it still remains.

Cleopatra’s Needle was secured to the Thames Embankment in September 1878
Encasing_Cleopatras_Needle_for_shipment_to_London.jpg
Source

KD: If the above photograph was taken in the United Kingdom, than what is that second obelisk in the picture? Do we have an additional Egyptian obelisk in the vicinity of the Thames river?

Cleopatra - Cylinder Ship
Designed by engineer John Dixon, the Cleopatra was essentially of an iron cylinder 92 feet (28 m) long and 16 feet (4.9 m) diameter containing the obelisk. It was supplemented by a bow and a vertical stern, rudder, two sidewalls, and a mast for sails to stabilise the vessel. A bridge was built to accommodate the crew.
  • Designed as a floating pontoon, and commanded by Captain Carter, it was to be towed to London by ship the Olga, commanded by Captain Booth.
  • The cylindrical shape was a clever choice in the context of a constrained budget (private funding by some patrons). Indeed, the cylinder, made of sheet metal riveted curves was literally built around the obelisk, with circular internal partitions used as cradles for the monolith.
  • Once completed , the ship looked like a primitive submarine, but its seagoing capabilities were more limited.
The Arrival of Cleopatra's Needle in the Cylinder Ship 'Cleopatra'
cleopatra-cylinder-ship.jpg

On 14 October 1877 the Cleopatra was in danger of sinking off France in the Bay of Biscay. The steam-ship towing her, the Olga, cut the towrope, and left the vessel adrift in the Bay. Five days later a ship spotted the ‘Cleopatra’ floating undamaged off the northern coast of Spain, and she was towed to the Ferrol, Galicia. There a steam-ship, the Anglia, arrived to tow her to London. They arrived at Gravesend on 21 January 1878. The Cleopatra was broken up immediately after the obelisk had been removed on 6 July 1878. The needle was positioned on the Thames Embankment, in September 1878 where it still stands.
KD: "The ship looked like a primitive submarine", and "broken up immediately" sounds rather suspicious.
  • What this steamship Olga, which existed in 1877? Sure it can't be this Olga here.
Additional "to London" Images
needle-ship-12.jpg
needle-ship2.jpg

London_obelisk_up-aired.jpg
Source

Full Progression
Above are random images of somewhat better visual quality. Below you can see the full official progression of encasing the London Cleopatra Needle. I'm not quite sure how they turned this thing into the end-result, but apparently they did.
cleo_1.jpg
cleo_2.jpgcleo_3.jpgcleo_4.jpgcleo_5.jpg
cleo_6.jpgcleo_7.jpgcleo_8.jpg
cleo_9.jpgcleo_10.jpg
cleo_11.jpg
A whaleback?

In London
cleo_12.jpg

Sources & Links:
kd_separator.jpg
KD: Today, when technology is more on par with handling 250 ton weights, we do not appear to care much for moving obelisks. At the same time, when we do move one, we choose to cut it into three pieces.

And I have nothing but questions. All of those could be answered separately, with plausible answers, but what do we really gain from such answers?
  • What's up with the obelisk infatuation exhibited by the ancient Romans and 19th century "move that obelisk" promoters?
  • Obelisks are allegedly nothing but pieces of reshaped stone. Wouldn't it be easier/cheaper to produce them locally?
  • If it was that troublesome to move obelisks from Egypt to wherever in the 19th century, how did they move them in 10 BC and early AD? Were they that bored?
    • And once again, ancient Romans are known for building some monumental stuff. Well, at least the narrative tells us that they are. Did hey really have nothing better to do other than transporting 300 ton obelisks from Egypt to Rome?
Essentially, what are we not seeing behind these ridiculous intercontinental rock transfers?
  • Did they really move those, or just presented that they did?
  • Some of the images look like ultra cheep movie sets. Well, at least to me they do.
  • What if obelisks were already at their final destination?
What do obelisks really do? As in, what tech, if any, could be hidden within? Just thinking... if they absolutely had to have these specific ones, and chose not to make similar looking ones...
Note: This OP was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: studytruth
Date: 2019-11-29 07:34:37
Reaction Score: 3
This is how I have come to understand obelisks. The key was that they need to be in pairs, one alone does not have the "tuning fork" power of the two together. I can not think of one place in Egypt were any pair remains.
Here is what I wrote in Power of Then,
"Current pylons are usually missing some of their key features. One is flags, but the long vertical slits that held the giant masts remain. The flag is the representation of God/Neter. It is symbolized as the wind, unseen in the physical, yet seen in the movement of the objects (flag) in creation. In front of Luxor, and in fact most temples, were two giant stone obelisks, raised and placed on a bottom platform with the help of a turning groove. Today usually only one remains at any temple (such as at Luxor), with freemasons having taken one half of the pair to Europe or America. In fact no surviving Egyptian temple has both obelisks in place. Obelisks can be seen as lighting rods to bring down the energy of the heavens and pull up the energy of the earth. They represent the primal I, the original observer, God. An obelisk will vibrate at great speed, though you may not realize it. Obelisks were set in pairs to act like a tuning fork- allowing anyone who passed between them to be tuned to a particular frequency."

I should add, the vibrational component of them can still be seen with the obelisk that is laying on its side at Karnak...if you strike the lower part of it- even just with your hand as a slap, it starts to make a sound...you have to smack it a few times to get it going a bit to really hear it.
Hence you the two going, then walking between them will harmonize you with the vibration of the obelisks. That is why they are in front of temple doorways...to harmonize one's energy with them before entering.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Plissken
Date: 2019-11-29 08:39:37
Reaction Score: 5
Of course I had to look at the orb. Pretty sure we all know what was originally in the ball. It is gilt or bronze according to sources.

gilt orb.jpg

Here is a sketch of the obelisk with the orb in it's original spot.

1st location of obelisk with bronze orb.jpg

???

And whatever this sketch is represents. Nice Fasces!

Ummmmmm.png

???

This is a lot of people giving it the literal heave ho. They must have been masters of timing. 1...2...3... Heave. 1...2...3...Ho!

Vatican .jpg

Book about the second move in Rome=source of the two sketches above.

? ? ? ?

About the transportation, I don't believe for a second that the round bracing they used would hold the obelisk in place without severe damage -- even on calm seas it would get worked. Then they run into a storm bad enough that they have to have the vessel salvaged and still no damage? There is not enough bubble wrap in the world to keep that package safe. I am voting for the found in place or nearby and re-erected and/or repaired. Of course TPTB, make up these ridiculous stories so we don't wonder why there are similar Egyptian style obelisks in locations all over the world. The fact that some of these were moved more than once after they left Egypt doesn't seem likely either. This is not the sofa we are talking about moving if we don't like the current spot it is in.

Plissken ?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2019-11-29 17:43:21
Reaction Score: 1
Pith hats and tropical whites suggest Egypt.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2019-11-30 07:42:25
Reaction Score: 0
Would be nice to find an untouched one of those.
That's what I thought. It has to be in Egypt.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Jim Duyer
Date: 2019-11-30 18:06:29
Reaction Score: 1
I've written most of a book about this subject, and I will be publishing it with my next one, in the coming few months. What I can relate as interesting, is when you see how many of the Masonic brotherhood were involved in these moves, both to London and to New York. Financing, engineering, smoothing the way with permits, etc., all courtesy of the group that most reveres things Egyptian.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2019-12-01 16:40:00
Reaction Score: 1
Wondering what magic Constantius II, used in the 4th century AD to load, transport and offload a 455 ton obelisk from Egypt to Rome.
 
Your opinion only and off topic comment.
I just realized this but obelisks cast a black shadow. They are literally symbols of a negro phallus. Our rulers are clinically insane porn addicts and the west is an Islamic sex cult. The communist fist is very specifically a black power fist. Our entire planet is run by Africa.

This is all about relanguaging the human race. No white people means no English or Greek which means no history. Just look at how the media demonize Plato. He was enlightened, and they'll never forgive him for sharing math and philosophy with the commoners.
 
Last edited:
I just realized this but obelisks cast a black shadow. They are literally symbols of a negro phallus. Our rulers are clinically insane porn addicts and the west is an Islamic sex cult. The communist fist is very specifically a black power fist. Our entire planet is run by Africa.

This is all about relanguaging the human race. No white people means no English or Greek which means no history. Just look at how the media demonize Plato. He was enlightened, and they'll never forgive him for sharing math and philosophy with the commoners.
Everything casts a black shadow, that's how shadows are. Your comment is your opinion only and totally off topic to the thread which is about the transportation of the obelisks.

You have received a warning but I am not deleting your comment as there has been too much of this kind of commenting lately and it's timely people be reminded that this kind of low effort contribution will not be tolerated on this history research site.
 
Last edited:
There are at least a dozen other obelisks in England, that are around the same size, if not bigger, than the one in London known as Cleopatra’s Needle. None of the others claim to have been moved, but to have been erected at the behest of some member of the landed gentry, or as memorial. I favour the idea that they once had an energy-storage and -usage function.
 
There are at least a dozen other obelisks in England, that are around the same size, if not bigger, than the one in London known as Cleopatra’s Needle. None of the others claim to have been moved, but to have been erected at the behest of some member of the landed gentry, or as memorial. I favour the idea that they once had an energy-storage and -usage function.
Are any of the others single blocks of stone?
 
Correction: another one “shipped from Egypt” with taxes written in hieroglyphs and Greek in Kingston Lacy, Dorset. Also made from a single block of granite. Generally though, no, they look mostly to be made of several or many blocks.
 
Aah. Reason I asked was because all the ones in the searches were made of blocks. You have inadvertently added another interesting angle to the transportation queries that are in the op.
Enter the "great balzoni" who is said to have removed and transported the pair of obelisks from Egypt to Kingston Lacy. Yes they were a pair with the broken one also being put on display at Kingston Lacy but as of the time of writing it seems to have disappeared.
Anyway I will continue attempting to find out how Balzoni managed to shift the obelisk to the port of London intact along with its broken twin but in the meantime here is an article on tbe bloke and his endeavours.
The Great Belzoni
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top