Stolen History Part 2 - The Destruction of the Old World

[Deleted member 1432]

I am thinking about more subtle implications.

Like being argumentative in forums perhaps?

 

[dreamtime]

Like being argumentative in forums perhaps?

I'm a fan of Dr. Ray Peat and his work. Lita Lee is one of the practicioners who study him:

​

Colloidal silver​

​

Many people take colloidal silver, thinking it’s a safe antibiotic. It’s not. Here is what Dr. Ray Peat says about using colloidal silver as an antibiotic. Silver is just slightly less toxic than mercury. Silver would be about as toxic as the organic antibiotics in the short term, and maybe worse if used chronically. Topically, it's probably not as toxic as mercurochrome; permanganate and copper sulfate might be just a little safer. How does silver kill bacteria? It works pretty much by the same mechanism that makes mercury a powerful antiseptic. Heavy metals are relatively indiscriminate oxidants (potent oxidizing agents). All heavy metals - lead, silver, mercury, nickel, cadmium- are very toxic, potent enzyme poisons and go into the brain, causing diseases like Alzheimer's, ALS, MS, etc.​

​

Safe nutritional support when antibiotics are needed:​

​

1. Thera-zyme TRMA, high in protease, catalase and minerals. For fever, redness, swelling and pain. Indicated when you have an infection requiring an antibiotic. Also great for soft tissue trauma, whether accidental or surgical. A general pain relief formula.​

​

2. Citricidal tabs or liquid. An extract from grapefruit seeds/pulp (not the same as grapefruit). I use this in combination with the TRMA formula in people who need antibiotics.​

​

3. Coconut oil is nourishing for the thyroid gland, so it’s a natural and inexpensive way of supporting the immune system.​

To Your Health - January 2002

 

[Prolix]

I'm a fan of Dr. Ray Peat and his work. Lita Lee is one of the practicioners who study him:

​

Colloidal silver​

​

Many people take colloidal silver, thinking it’s a safe antibiotic. It’s not. Here is what Dr. Ray Peat says about using colloidal silver as an antibiotic. Silver is just slightly less toxic than mercury. Silver would be about as toxic as the organic antibiotics in the short term, and maybe worse if used chronically. Topically, it's probably not as toxic as mercurochrome; permanganate and copper sulfate might be just a little safer. How does silver kill bacteria? It works pretty much by the same mechanism that makes mercury a powerful antiseptic. Heavy metals are relatively indiscriminate oxidants (potent oxidizing agents). All heavy metals - lead, silver, mercury, nickel, cadmium- are very toxic, potent enzyme poisons and go into the brain, causing diseases like Alzheimer's, ALS, MS, etc.​

​

Safe nutritional support when antibiotics are needed:​

​

1. Thera-zyme TRMA, high in protease, catalase and minerals. For fever, redness, swelling and pain. Indicated when you have an infection requiring an antibiotic. Also great for soft tissue trauma, whether accidental or surgical. A general pain relief formula.​

​

2. Citricidal tabs or liquid. An extract from grapefruit seeds/pulp (not the same as grapefruit). I use this in combination with the TRMA formula in people who need antibiotics.​

​

3. Coconut oil is nourishing for the thyroid gland, so it’s a natural and inexpensive way of supporting the immune system.​

To Your Health - January 2002

Certainly, my concern with colloidal silver (which I do use) is that it's indiscriminate in its activity, killing bacteria good and bad, so my approach tends to be on a "when necessary" or precautionary basis, rather than taking daily maintenance doses (which I know some swear by).

 

[Deleted member 1432]

lead, silver, mercury, nickel, cadmium- are very toxic, potent enzyme poisons and go into the brain, causing diseases like Alzheimer's, ALS, MS, etc.

When you blamed Felix's "'personality patterns" on our mother's amalgams (just a couple of days after she died btw,) you were mistaken, as he uses CS as well and she didn't get any amalgams until after we were born. Therefore, your diagnosis should now be that we are both clearly suffering from personality patterns caused by 20 year's abuse of Colloidal Silver.

my approach tends to be on a "when necessary" or precautionary basis, rather than taking daily maintenance doses

Exactly As you would with any antibiotic.

 

[Morinehtar]

Thanks for the amazing documentary, I can't wait to watch the rest of the series.

I just wanted to add something regarding the Manaus city in Brazillian Amazonia. The fact that a city could be built there "in the middle of nothing" is easily explained by the fact that the river works as an amazing road.

Anyone in Brazil is well aware that land roads are secondary and real arteries that pump the Amazon heart are the Amazon River and its tributaries.

It is still interesting that such a city would be built there anyway, but I believe that the road explanation should be corrected in a later documentary edition because it might misleads the viewers into thinking that there was a practical physical obstacle in creating such a city, which is not true in anyway.

Thanks again and please keep with the good work! =)

 

[SknowMercy]

What is being waged in the world is a cultural war. Every initiative to oppose the oppression promoted by the powerful, the beneficiaries of those who destroyed the true story, must be applauded.
Written content is wonderful, but audiovisual content is the way people are really touched and inspired.

The video was wonderful.

What is being waged in the world is a cultural war. Every initiative to oppose the oppression promoted by the powerful, the beneficiaries of those who destroyed the true story, must be applauded.
Written content is wonderful, but audiovisual content is the way people are really touched and inspired.

The video was wonderful.

This is my first time posting, apologies for formatting errors.

Just wanted to chime in to say it takes all types, we all have preferences when it comes to learning and accumulating knowledge. For most people nowadays you are most assuredly correct in that audiovisual is the medium to reach them. There's still some of us that are more inclined to the written word though.

Belonging to the latter group, I GREATLY appreciate the transcript above. Thank you to everyone who dedicate their time, energy and knowledge making this excellent community possible. While I may not watch the videos, I will certainly share them with those I know who will.

 

[Gold]

I wouldn't be surprised if low dose colloidal silver and gold are actually beneficial without risk of side effects. I know the research behind colloidal silver and it definitely is a very strong, universal antibiotic that can save a lot of lifes and is less risky than commercial antibiotics, but I am still not certain that long-term use of colloidal silver is without risk. Silver is toxic to human cells, the question is what's the threshold. I think both colloidal silver and gold need to get more attention to research it properly.

In my own experience and that of the manufacturers in the community I'm a part of, people have used it for decades with virtually no negative side effects.
Shit, I even took a massive antibiotic dose once and it had virtually no noticeable damage. And at a few hundred miligrams you'd think you'd notice something. The bar to hurt yourself seems to be extremely high with colloidal silver. The guy who turned himself blue from drinking ionic silver, even, had to drink gallons over a long time for that to happen.
Research papers I was aware of on the effect of CG on IQ (before they were completely wiped from university archives) showed gold was very safe up until above 70 mg or so if I remember correctly, at high doses it started to cause seizures but at 15-30, nothing but benefit. Same testimony from the people making it, decades of use at the 15-30 mg range, no damage. Some people experienced feeling a bit under the weather at first, speculating it may be symptoms of mercury chelation.
In my experience it did nothing but good for me, improved memory and gave me extremely vivid, long long dreams.

Turning blue is pharma-propaganda. I am thinking about more subtle implications. Before the advent of synthetic antibiotics, people were using things like colloidal silver and Lugol's iodine, and I think we should go back to things like this and start from there, it's a good foundation.

I think reckless use of silver, mostly ionic but it can apply to colloidal as well, could harm the gut biome. But with CS, it seems to not matter more or less, with ionic, it's much riskier.

 

[dreamtime]

In my own experience and that of the manufacturers in the community I'm a part of, people have used it for decades with virtually no negative side effects.
Shit, I even took a massive antibiotic dose once and it had virtually no noticeable damage. And at a few hundred miligrams you'd think you'd notice something. The bar to hurt yourself seems to be extremely high with colloidal silver. The guy who turned himself blue from drinking ionic silver, even, had to drink gallons over a long time for that to happen.
Research papers I was aware of on the effect of CG on IQ (before they were completely wiped from university archives) showed gold was very safe up until above 70 mg or so if I remember correctly, at high doses it started to cause seizures but at 15-30, nothing but benefit. Same testimony from the people making it, decades of use at the 15-30 mg range, no damage. Some people experienced feeling a bit under the weather at first, speculating it may be symptoms of mercury chelation.
In my experience it did nothing but good for me, improved memory and gave me extremely vivid, long long dreams.

I think reckless use of silver, mostly ionic but it can apply to colloidal as well, could harm the gut biome. But with CS, it seems to not matter more or less, with ionic, it's much riskier.

Do you know "The Body Electric" by Robert O. Becker? He used colloidal silver to stimulate regeneration of body parts.

 

[Gold]

Do you know "The Body Electric" by Robert O. Becker? He used colloidal silver to stimulate regeneration of body parts.

I do not, tell me more. Actually I VAGUELY remember something about someone regenerating a fingertip.

 

[Taira Earth]

I'm using machine translation.

Stolen History Part 2 - 旧世界の破壊
Hi, everyone. I've ported the OP page to the Japanese version of SH.
I think it will be a great guide for seekers in Japan.

 

[asatiger1966]

Hello everyone - we are proud to present our first 'real' video documentary of our "Stolen History" series (part 1 was mostly an introduction).

Many thanks to @David Glenney and @Sovereine for narrating. This documentary has already been published in the german language a couple weeks ago, and now it's also available in english.

If you want to support our work on the documentary, you can do so on Patreon. We have a professional video producer who works on this next to his full-time job. Please subscribe to our new, separate, docu channel.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrc6-Zjarbw

Mirror on our main Youtube channel - Bitchute Mirror

View attachment 11418​

Here is the entire video transcript:​

The Destruction Of The Old World​

Collective Memory​

"And now the mythless man, eternally hungry, stands among all pasts, digging and burrowing for roots, be it that he had to dig for them even in the remotest antiquities. To what does the tremendous historical need of the unsatisfied modern culture, the gathering around of countless other cultures, the consuming desire for recognition, point, if not to the loss of the myth, to the loss of the mythical home, the mythical womb?"

"Without myth, however, every culture loses its healthy creative power..."

- Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy from the Spirit of Music
​

The most pressing problem of man today is the loss of meaning. Meaning is rooted in the past. When knowledge of the past fades, so does the meaning of life. Today's man does not know where he comes from, who he is, and where he is going. He has become a pawn in the hands of powers that can direct him at will. Uprooted from his past, there is no foundation. And without a foundation based on reality, there is no way to develop an objective understanding of the world. Only the way back to one's roots gives meaning back to life.

Epigenetics - the study of heritable changes in gene expression that are not directly encoded in our DNA - suggests that our life experiences (such as hardships, traumatic experiences, etc.) are passed on to subsequent generations. Mythological and religious traditions go even further and speak of a collective memory.

Already in the Vedas (the holy scriptures of Hinduism) a kind of universal memory is mentioned. The Sanskrit word "Akasha" stands for heaven, space or ether and, according to the Eastern wisdom tradition, refers to the most subtle of the five elements from which everything else was created. Thus, according to Indian mythology, all thoughts that have ever been thought and all deeds that have ever been performed are stored in this information field, which is also expressed in the legendary palm leaf libraries of India and Sri Lanka. The conception of a world memory also exists in the occidental culture. We can find similar references in the Bible, for example when the book of Isaiah speaks of a "memory book".

So we can assume that all experiences of our ancestors still exist - in an energy field invisible to us (until around 100 years ago the ether was still a standard concept in physics to explain the properties of invisible space), and even if today we are largely disconnected from our past, the experiences have not disappeared, but are only buried. Accordingly, it must be possible for us to reconnect with our past if we lift the veil and allow the memories to surface again. In order to access collective memories, a collective effort is required to a certain degree; an individual alone is not able to break through the amnesia.

There are images that are so strongly charged with meaning that people are inexplicably drawn to them - the world's religions draw to some extent on such images, albeit in extremely destructive ways. Myths and fairy tales also contain such images. The more a myth is charged with meaning, the more important was its role in our past. By the radiance of a myth we can already recognize its importance for mankind - if we allow it, let ourselves be touched by it. For example, the Flood has burned itself into our collective memory, but so have the stories of giants, dragons or malicious witches. The more we humans abandon these mythical images, the more we alienate ourselves from our own past and thus from our own being. This process of self-alienation began with the so-called Age of Enlightenment.

Immanuel Velikovsky writes:


In recent centuries, great efforts have been made to make us humans forget where we come from and who we are. The destruction of the old knowledge of physics and biology was particularly powerful in uprooting us. Einstein and Darwin represent the inversion of the old knowledge into a nihilistic worldview; with man as a meaningless, random something, adrift in an endless and cold universe. These anti-life models about reality were perfected only recently - in the 19th century - and could even fully prevail only in the 20th century - too great was the resistance even in academic circles of the early 20th century. The so-called Big Bang theory is a good example to understand how religious-esoteric concepts entered science. The Belgian Jesuit and priest Georges Lemaitre created the Big Bang theory - not on the basis of scientific facts, but on the basis of a religious conviction, a notion of a primordial or cosmic seed from which everything evolved. At that time, the Jesuits were given the task of embedding the myths of the origin of the world in a scientific-sounding framework. A few decades later, in 1951, the Pontifical Academy of Sciences accepted the Big Bang theory. This long wait for the Pope's acceptance was not due to opposition from the Church, but from the general public - after all, the Big Bang theory originated from the hands of the Vatican itself. Ironically, the irrational Big Bang theory is still part of our modern worldview, and still not a single proof has been presented.

The nihilistic and mechanistic world view, represented by Rosseau and other so-called masterminds of the "Enlightenment", could only flourish on the breeding ground of industrialization. After all, industrialization turned man into a mechanical being who was reduced to material aspects. Industrialization must be seen as a turning point, and as the most notable event that is still comprehensible and visible to us today, as a result of a reset in the 18th or early 19th century. This reset followed an event that also brought about the so-called mud flood - all over the world, the buildings of the old world were partially submerged in the earth, and the former first floors were thus usually converted into cellars. Little is known about the cause of the mud flood, possible is a world war we don't remember or an electromagnetic plasma event.

Velikovsky again on this:



According to biologist Rupert Sheldrake, collective memory is "inherent to nature" - living systems have a collective memory of all past experiences of the entire species, this memory exists in an invisible but real energy field.

Our collective memories are still there, but since the dawn of modernity they mainly break through in supposedly fictional stories, e.g. in Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings" universe. Tolkien wrote down his story, rooted in Germanic mythology, during the First World War - at exactly the time that can be recognized as the final destruction of the old, magical world. World War 1 marked the beginning of the civilizational descent into soulless modernity.

Perhaps Tolkien had to write down his vision of Middle Earth because the human psyche cannot survive without a connection to reality. Even if this connection is maintained via supposedly fictional stories. It is interesting to note in this context, that fantasy stories are also an invention of the industrial age - it was only around 1850 that fictional novels became suitable for mass consumption. Could it be that people were not interested in immersing themselves in dissociative worlds at all as long as life itself was full of meaning and conveyed a higher purpose? The more hostile and cold our society becomes, the stronger becomes the urge to escape into imaginary worlds, and as these imaginary worlds are fed by our collective memories, it is this repressed energy which breathes life into them. With the destruction of religions by so-called science founded by secret societies, people were deprived of one of the last connections to the past. But the truth wants to come to light again and it will eventually resurface. Enormous efforts are being made to keep humanity asleep, because our potential and true power is almost limitless.

Industrialization​

During the course of industrialization during the 19th century, far-reaching social changes occurred in the Western world. The extent of these changes has not yet been adequately understood. Aspects such as rural flight, mass impoverishment, orphanages, lack of hygiene in the cities and related epidemics are known in historical research, but these are only the effects of the Industrial Revolution. A more elusive topic has been the question what caused the massive technological upheavals of the 19th century. So far, the two most important questions have not been answered sufficiently: Why did the Industrial Revolution begin in England, and why precisely around 1800?

If you break it down to its essence, the Industrial Revolution consisted of ground-breaking technological inventions that permanently changed social life, and enabled increasing automation of production. In particular, the development of the steam engine supposedly laid the foundation for the further development of electric and internal combustion engines, which form the foundation of today's society.

The Industrial Revolution presents us with a conundrum. In terms of the official narrative, humanity bumbled along at a low state of development for thousands of years, only to suddenly undergo a massive leap in development within a few decades without any apparent external cause. To make matters even more absurd, since the end of the industrial age, mankind has again found itself in a period of technological stagnation - the supposed inventive spirit of Central Europe and Germany in particular, which historians say made industrialization possible, seems to have vanished.

The role of the United Kingdom is central to understanding what was really behind the so-called Industrial Revolution.

In historical research, it is commonly believed that the Industrial Revolution began as early as the mid-18th century-around 1760. In fact, however, little evidence can be found to support this claim. According to various historians (Cameron, Adams, McCloskey), there is no evidence of industrialization in contemporary literature as late as 1830. We must assume that the ruling forces backdated the course of the Industrial Revolution in order to somewhat defuse its explosive character - in fact, the "new" technological knowledge was unleashed on humanity within a few decades by a small elite operating primarily from Rome (Vatican), Venice, London and Washington. The true Industrial Revolution comes closest to what is commonly referred to in research as the "Second Industrial Revolution" - the phase of rapid industrialization beginning in 1860.

What is being sold to us as inventions was, in all likelihood, a controlled release of technologies that were widely available and powered by free energy before the reset - free in the sense that everyone had direct access to the energy source.

Only this time, the difference was that the technology was tied to scarce and hard-to-get resources, allowing the ruling powers to gain a monopoly on the production of goods. Since the Industrial Revolution, the world-wide generation and production of wealth has been controlled by a small group. Along with the control of the fiat money system through central banks, the scarcity of energy has been the most important element in controlling the masses. This process is reflected, for example, in the conflict between Tesla and Edison, or Tesla and Einstein. Tesla defended the holistic model of the old world, thinking in terms of energy, frequencies and vibration, and did not want energy production to end up in the hands of a few. When the industrialists (first of all J.P. Morgan), who at that time were responsible for building the energy monopolies, realized that Tesla's work was not suitable for the oppression of humanity, he was marginalized into oblivion.

If in reality the Industrial Revolution did not take place until well after 1830, we are talking about a period of about 50 years - roughly 1850 to 1900 - during which the old knowledge was reintroduced in modified form. Not coincidentally, the first major World's Fair was held in London in 1851.

Imperialism​

Why did the Industrial Revolution begin in England? Historians are in the dark, but the single deciding factor that set the British Empire apart from all other countries at the time was colonialism and imperialism. The British Crown controlled a large part of the so-called "New World." And the Crown, of course, stole not only labor and goods - as historians likes to portray - but the remaining knowledge from before the reset as well. And knowledge includes technologies.

Officially, much of India's knowledge is said to have been wiped out by a genocide of Indian scholars and a series of invasions over the course of the last 1200 years, but evidence suggests that it was British colonialism that significantly mutilated India's culture. For example, one of the main activities of the "Asiatic Society of Bengal," officially founded in 1784 and under the patronage of Warren Hastings, was to systematically collect and preserve ancient manuscripts of India, as well as inscriptions in stone and metal, icons, or ancient coins. And Friedrich Max Müller, one of the founders of the Western academic field of Indian studies, was paid by the East India Trading Company to translate the Vedas, to distort them permanently and to create arbitrary dates.

Thus, on December 9, 1867, he wrote to his wife:



In a book titled "The Truth About Us: The Politics of Information and Society from Manu to Modi", Sanjoy Chakravorty shows that even the current understanding of the caste system was developed only during British colonial rule, at a time when the colonial powers' power over information was absolute.

Anthropologist Susan Bayly noted, that...



Even the pre-colonial written records in royal court documents and travelogues studied by professional historians and philologists such as Nicholas Dirks, G. S. Ghurye, Richard Eaton, David Shulman, and Cynthia Talbot make little or no mention of the caste system.

But back to the United Kingdom - for India has been called the "Jewel in the Crown" for good reason.

Michelle Gibson (insert URL: https://piercingtheveilofillusion.com/) writes:



We can imagine that before the reset, the European countries had embassies in India and there was a lively cultural exchange of values and goods, which collapsed only in the wake of the cataclysmic events. A new European elite took advantage of the power vacuum created by the collapse of the advanced civilizations and transformed the formerly existing trade structures into all-consuming power apparatuses.

This would also explain existing inconsistencies. For historical research has never been able to explain satisfactorily why the colonial powers only began to expand their rule over the colonies with brute force and blind missionary zeal a few hundred years after colonization. This so-called high imperialism began in 1850, with the suppression of the Indian rebellion of 1857 considered a key event. In 1885, the Congo Conference, held in Berlin at Bismarck's invitation, settled the effective division of Africa among the colonial powers. At the Congo Conference, the concept of state formation was applied to Africa and imposed on the continent, but thinking in terms of state boundaries and national identities was still fairly new in Europe as well. In 1884, the Washington Agreement enforced the worldwide time system according to "Greenwich Mean Time," which had been introduced in the British Empire in 1847. The role of the German Empire in relation to imperialism was primarily to denounce human rights violations, to establish legal foundations, and to keep in check the colonial superpowers that were committing inconceivable atrocities in the colonies. However, in the course of falsifying history after World War 2, German imperialism is nowadays usually portrayed in a negative light. Based on this lie, the German colonies were divided among the other colonial powers after WW1.

To outline the research of colonialism expert Bruce Gilley:



Most of the official history of colonialism between 1500 and 1800 is probably largely fabricated, which includes the notion that the Spanish were responsible for the impressive South American architecture, or that the British rebuilt India from the ground up. This is all a lie. Instead, sometime between 1700 and 1850, a worldwide cataclysm occurred by which the unified culture broke apart and most knowledge about free energy and high culture was lost. People were collectively thrown into a dark age in which they began to focus on survival and experienced a period of suffering and deprivation.

The now dominant power elite, upon coming to power, reintroduced some parts of the old knowledge to change society in a way that suited them; this time period is known to us as the Industrial Age.

This power elite has its roots in the Roman Empire. The countries of the Western Roman Empire gradually became huge economic and warlike nations: Italy, Venice, Portugal, Spain, France, Britain, the Netherlands. The first financial center was established in Venice (which was later moved to Switzerland). All those who did not want to submit to the Church were killed or fled towards "Germania". The approach of the church corresponds to the tactics of the Roman conquests. The church then divided the territory and set up its own administrators in these areas. The subsequent emergence of the high nobility, all of them loyal to the church, can be attributed to this. The Roman army was at one point dissolved and divided into knightly orders. Germany, as a stronghold of Protestantism, was able to resist these ecclesiastical forces a little longer, but was also taken over at some point, as was the Moscovite Tartary (the former empire of the Scythians), which was taken over by Russia. Since then, the European powers have all been controlled from behind the scenes by the cabal, and they managed to make it look like Britain, Germany, France, Portugal, Spain and Russia were competing with each other, but they were actually working together.

The Hohenzollern and Orange-Nassau noble families simultaneously controlled Britain, the Netherlands, the German Empire, as well as the Russian Tsarist Empire. The Habsburgs, funded by the Fuggers, controlled Central Europe, the Vatican and parts of Western Europe. So the Russian Tsarist Empire was already in the hands of the cabal, moving from Prussia to Russia, and Russian history was written in the 18th century by western European academics, who also occupied the most important positions in the newly founded Russian Academy of Sciences. The Russian Empire was then deployed to destroy the great Tartar Empire.

The heart of the darkness lay in Western Europe.

It was a race against time, for most of the world was just recovering from the reset, and all the Europeans had to do was get a few of their people on ships, get them quickly to the ruined kingdoms, kill or expel or manipulate the rulers, and proclaim a new political system.

The Japanese Seclusion Edict (reportedly from 1636) stated the following:



Thus began a social epoch in Japan known today as "Sakoku" - the voluntary isolation of Japan from all Western powers.

It was not until 1853 (two years after the first World's Fair in London) that the West actually succeeded in turning Japan away from its peaceful, self-sufficient life:



This was just a few years after the same forces had destroyed ancient China in what is now known as the Opium Wars.



The same old game over and over again.

It is important to realize that everyone in China and Japan hated Catholics because Catholicism was used as a weapon to weaken their countries culturally before the British also took over the political structures. Until the 1840s, China and Japan were defending themselves quite successfully. Even back then, Vatican-controlled Catholicism had nothing to do with genuine Christianity. Rather, the Vatican was used to infiltrate genuine Christianity.

Michelle Gibson:



The Emperor of the Roman Empire became the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church. The famous Papal Bull Unam Sanctam, supposedly dating back to the Middle Ages, was intended to cement the absolute rule of the Pope.

The last sentence of this bull reads:



Thus the Pope legitimized himself as the sole representative of God on earth. The so-called "heretical" Christian communities, such as the Albigensians and Cathars, condemned the papacy as the church of the Antichrist and considered themselves the successors of the true Christian heritage, which, however, was allowed to continue only in secret.

Papal Catholics were accused, among other things, of being responsible for the mysterious fires that destroyed entire cities: The monument in the City of London about the London fire of 1666 still read until 1830, "The most terrible destruction of this city; begun and carried on by the treachery and wickedness of the papal faction."

Western historians confused Jesuit Catholicism with Christianity and accused Japan and China of blindly hating all Christians, while omitting all facts proving the obvious interference of the Jesuits and the Catholic Church in foreign affairs.

Thus, regarding the reshaping of the Chinese chronology, we read the following from Uwe Topper in "The Great Forgery Event":



With this rewriting of the chronology, the Jesuits laid the groundwork for the British takeover of China in 1842. Not only Christianity, but also Islam and Judaism, were sooner or later used to control the masses.

Because of the nature of the rewrite, we do not even know if the general timeline of events prior to these wars in the name of imperialism is true. The timeline for many events around the world was artificially extended to give more credence to the idea of a centuries-long process of colonization and to distract from the fact that until the reset, there was a unified civilization of multiple, independent cultures that traded peacefully with each other.

The supposedly new technological knowledge was introduced worldwide in the course of the 19th century, first and foremost in Western Europe and the Americas. An important role in the reintroduction of the old technologies (in the new guise of energy scarcity) was played by the World's Fairs. From 1851 onwards, countless world exhibitions were held. Today this tradition still exists in the form of the Expos, but in principle they no longer play a role, since there have been no real technological breakthroughs since the 2 World Wars, with the exception of information technology, which is being deliberately developed to bring the dystopian vision of transhumanism to the world. It can be said that with World War 1, not only classical architecture but also innovation disappeared from the world.

Before industrialization, there was only one form of sophisticated architecture in the world. Known today as historicism, or revival architecture, because according to the official narrative, virtually all of these buildings were created only in the 19th century, supposedly as a recourse to ancient Greco-Roman architectural trends (neo-Gothic, neo-Renaissance, neo-baroque, etc.).

The basic principles of these buildings were always the same and their quality unrivaled. Is this uniform architecture an indication of a unified civilization that only recently broke up into individual kingdoms or nation-states?

Even in Japan there were these Greco-Roman classical buildings before 1900, although Japan was still completely isolated from the outside world until around 1850, and even after that, after the British had forcibly conquered Japan, it only slowly and hesitantly opened up to the West.

The German chronology critic Christoph Pfister writes in his book "The Matrix of Ancient History" about the chronological dating of European building culture:


In other words, the "colonization" of the world did not take place until 1700 at the earliest, but was backdated by the falsifiers of history on behalf of the imperial powers. Imperialism developed as a reaction to an event, possibly a war or a natural disaster, which wiped out the old (so-called ancient) world and left a (power) vacuum. Western Europe managed to emerge from this vacuum as a winner. Imperialism was a kind of worldwide raid by the Western European powers to grab the countries of the world that had been devastated by the catastrophe. The conflicts between the individual colonial powers (Spain, Portugal, England, Germany, etc.) that have been handed down historically are part of the game of hide-and-seek played by the European power elite organized in secret societies and shadow organizations, but these conflicts took place only on a superficial political level - because, as is the case today, public decision-makers were rarely privy to the real plans.

Let us now look at the story of two buildings:

New York Pennsylvania Station – Wikipedia

Penn Station in New York, built between 1904 and 1910. Demolished in 1963 - because the building was dirty and the maintenance costs could allegedly no longer be met.

Built in the Greco-Roman style.

Ada Louise Huxtable wrote in the New York Times in 1963:


Erie County Savings Building, built in 1893 in the Neo-Romanesque style.

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https://s3.amazonaws.com/bncore/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Chronicles-combo-pic.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

We read about the demolition of the Erie County Savings Bank Building in 1968 in the Buffalo Evening News:


Western New York Heritage Press

If we look at the bigger picture, the two world wars appear in a new light. The colonization of the world took place later than we are told - only in the 1700's. By the early 1900's most of the world was under the control of the Eropean Elite-controlled colonial powers - primarily England, France, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Portugal, Russia, Italy. These nations were all already infiltrated by secret societies. Then, with the two world wars, European culture itself was largely destroyed, and as a result, people were deprived of the ability to remember - the wars created a collective trauma that made it difficult to connect with the pre-war period.

If we look at the earliest photographs from the former colonies - particularly India - we see a world in ruins and people who are not suited to the structures in which they live. These photos resemble 18th- and 19th-century landscapes of Europe. If we ignore the official timeline for a moment, we can entertain the thought that our world was laid in ruins not too long ago, and that this event allowed parasitic forces to establish a New World Order. This New World Order is still in the making, and has as its goal the complete uprooting of man from his being and his history.

The 19th century saw the conquest of the last part of the Tartar Empire by the Russian Empire. The "Independent" or "Free Tartary", as it was called on the old maps, was located until about 1870 directly east of the Caspian Sea, in the territory of today's Uzbekistan with cities like Samarkand and Bukhara. However, Tartary is not mentioned in the official history of Uzbekistan.

Anatoly Fomenko writes on the subject of Independent Tartary:


A few decades later, the Soviets, on behalf of the cabal, destroyed large parts of the Central Asian remnants of the old world in the name of communism.

The first Anglo-Afghan War, the settlement of New Zealand and Australia, and the gold rush in the American West also fall within this period.

Consequences of Industrialization​

In 1839, John D. Rockefeller Senior was born in the United States. He later founded the Standard Oil Company in 1870. The World's Fairs coincided with the power struggle for authority in physics and the monopolization of energy production, with the sinking of the Titanic and the founding of the Federal Reserve Bank. At that time, the cabal got rid of those industrialists who opposed the plan of establishing a New World Order. The three most prominent opponents of the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank - Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidor Strauss and John Jacob Astor - all died with the sinking of the Titanic. The Titanic belonged to J.P. Morgan, one of the string-pullers behind the creation of the FED, who "spontaneously" decided against being present at the maiden voyage. In 1910 the first plans for the foundation of the FED took place on Jekyll Island, in April 1912 the Titanic sank (in reality her sister ship, the Olympic, sank), and a year later in 1913 the FED was founded with the passing of the Federal Reserve Act, thus laying the foundation for the arbitrary control of the world economy by the secret elite, which had already infiltrated most nations at that time. Woodrow Wilson signed the act, allowing the FED to issue Federal Reserve Notes (U.S. dollars). A few months later, the First World War began the civilizational decline in Central Europe, nations were set against each other.

In 1866, Otto von Bismarck led Prussia into the German War of Brothers against Austria. After the end of this fratricidal war, he did not include Austria in the newly formed North German Confederation and annexed Alsace-Lorraine. He thus created, possibly without being aware of it, the structural conditions for the First and Second World Wars. However, the assassination attempt on Bismarck and his dismissal by Wilhelm II indicate that he was a thorn in the side of the secret societies; his anti-Catholic policy of the Kulturkampf may also have contributed to this.

The war against the Germans started with Rome's propaganda against the supposedely primitive "Germania", and continued with the Reformation wars. In the course of the 30-year's War, Germany's spiritual backbone was broken. As Heinrich Heine said, "Bondage is in the German himself, in his soul; worse than material slavery is spiritualized slavery. Germans must be liberated from within; nothing helps from without." Bismarck tried to reduce the influence of the Vatican and Secret Socities. The final nail in the coffin of Germany were the Two World Wars followed by controlled migration and population replacement.

Albert Einstein published his two theories of relativity in 1905 and 1916. With the general theory of relativity, the Aether was finally abolished in physics. General relativity was needed primarily to explain the properties of space without recourse to an objectively existing ether field. Even Einstein was so uncomfortable with this action in retrospect (presumably he realized at some point what his financiers had intended) that he later still tried to clarify that his theories would not work at all without the aether, but by then the damage was done and he had fulfilled his role of eliminating the old knowledge of the holistic physics of the aether from science.

Holistic scientists like Nikola Tesla had no place in the new world and were starved out, but only after their skills were used. The monopolization of production also included the demonization of hemp. Andrew Mellon, Randolph Hearst, and the Du Pont family were instrumental in pushing through the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, which raised taxes on hemp in the U.S. to bleed the hemp industry dry and support the oil industry. Banker Andrew Mellon appointed Harry Anslinger as chairman of the newly formed Federal Bureau of Narcotics. Basically, the goal was to create the conditions to make humanity dependent on the system in the long run, and to eradicate any possibility of self-determination and freedom. The 19th century was also the time of the establishment of mass indoctrination institutions, called schools, where state-imposed propaganda was taught to educate young people to become willing recipients of orders. The expansion of compulsory education and the Gleichschaltung of teachers then picked up speed again in the 20th century with the Rise of Fascism and Communism.

If the Vatican had not already achieved sufficient success through the consistent persecution of witches and the Inquisition, as well as the burning of books and the destruction of culture, then its mission was crowned with success with the widespread introduction of religious propaganda, which no child could escape. Thus Karlheinz Deschner wrote in his book "God and the Fascists: The Vatican Alliance with Mussolini, Franco, Hitler, and Pavelic" that under Mussolini the books of the Italian elementary schools consisted of one third of catechism pieces and prayers and two thirds of glorifications of fascism and war. The whole thing was crowned only by renewed bans on anti-clerical criticism and media coverage. Thus one of the basic principles of the old world - each community (family) lives autonomously and is responsible for its own children - was invalidated. The consequent tearing apart of these communities and the early centralized indoctrination were of central importance.

Then, with the Flexner Report of 1910, the robber barons Rockefeller and Carnegie destroyed holistic medicine in the U.S. and laid the groundwork for building the anti-life medical cartel under which we live today. Electrotherapy, phytotherapy, and osteopathy for example, were banned from the official canon, and the curriculum was standardized so that pharma-controlled conventional medicine could establish itself as the only recognized form of medicine. Most independent schools were forced to close as a result of the Flexner Report. The Flexner Report was inspired by the destruction of alternative healing methods in Germany, where the policies of the Flexner Report had already been implemented in 1880:


Every area of modern science is now dominated by an ideological doctrinaire establishment, in which positions are awarded to each other, and it is ensured that real insights are suppressed.

The British used opium to take over China. In Europe, the Dutch Cocaine Factory was responsible for anesthetizing the population, and during WW1 supplied all countries involved in the war with cocaine imported from Peru. It was through the Dutch Cocaine Factory, which was supported and protected by the government and had a virtual monopoly on cocaine, that World War 1 was made possible, because it was only through alienation and anesthesia that soldiers were able to endure the suffering during the war. The Netherlands emerged from WW1 as one of the richest countries in the world thanks to the sale of cocaine. Innumerable traumatized soldiers remained addicted to cocaine after the war and even raided pharmacies to obtain it.

Michelle Gibson assumes that all the railroad tracks were just dug up and that all the infrastructure (locomotives, cars, stations) was already in place as well. She speculates that it was an electrified rail system, and after the free worldwide energy grid was shut down, the free energy sources for mass transportation were replaced by oil and coal. The newly created dependence on fossil fuels was one of the foundations of the fabulous wealth of the industrialist robber-baron families.

About the tramway network in Manaus (Brazil), she writes:


The Incredible Similarity of Electric Tram Systems Worldwide

Isn't it a bit strange that directly after the sinking of the Titanic and the crash of the Hindenburg the way of transportation was standardized worldwide so that almost exclusively petroleum is used? And this has not changed in the last 100 years! Why was the public never shown a single photo showing the beginning of the Hindenburg's fire, although 22 professional photographers were present at the event? Why was the "static spark" theory chosen as the cause of the Hindenburg's sinking, even though there was no evidence to support this theory? Why did all nations stop building airships after the Hindenburg burned?

Between 1907 and 1909, 16 imposing American warships with other escort ships - the so-called Great White Fleet - circumnavigated the world and paid a visit to many countries, as the story goes. Officially, the purpose was to demonstrate America's power to the world and to promote cooperation. But perhaps it was simply an inspection of the newly staked possessions around the world and an inventory of which kingdoms had not yet surrendered to the new order.

The foundation of the world we live in today was laid at that time during the World's Exhibitions. The technological knowledge of the old world was selected: One part of the knowledge was kept secret, the other part was presented to the public. One of the most important criteria in this decision-making process may have been whether a technology could be controlled by a central authority. Any form of free, no-cost energy, for example, was very dangerous to the forces that controlled the robber barons of the Industrial Age secretly from the shadows. It is important to understand that these industrialists had not earned their wealth themselves - they were born into elite families and chosen to play a role. These families and structures still exist today - be it Elon Musk, Bill Gates or Steve Jobs - none of them rose to power and money through their own efforts.

But, to end with Tolkien, nothing is lost. In our world - Middle Earth - the descent into darkness dominated by evil is part of the process of humanity's evolution:

The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.
From the ashes a fire shall be woken,
A light from the shadows shall spring;
Renewed shall be blade that was broken,
The crownless again shall be king.”​

Outro​

I came into this world in the rough and ready year of 1923. It was a barbarous time. It was a bleak time. And it was an uncivilized time.

My memories stretch back almost a hundred years. And if I close my eyes, I can smell the poverty that oozes from the dusky tenement streets of my boyhood.

I can taste on my lips the bread and drippings, that I was served for my tea. I can remember extreme hunger, and my parent’s undying love for me. In my heart, I can still feel my mum and dad’s desperation as they tried to keep our family safe and healthy in the slum we called home.

Poor mum and dad. No matter how hard they tried to protect me and my sisters, the cards were stacked against them.

No one in our community was safe from poor health, sickness and disease. In our home, TB came for my eldest sister, Marion.

She wasted away before our eyes until my mother could no longer handle her care, and she was dispatched to our workhouse infirmary where she died at the age of 10, 87 years ago.

My family’s story isn’t unique. Sadly, rampant poverty and no health care were the norm for the Britain of my youth. That injustice galvanized my generation to become the tide that raised all boats.

I am not a politician, a member of the elite or a financial guru. But my life is your history, and we should keep it that way.

Sources​

Forgot them. If you want to volunteer collecting sources from the above transcript, please contact me.

Images​

View attachment 11413View attachment 11414View attachment 11415View attachment 11416View attachment 11417View attachment 11325View attachment 11326View attachment 11327View attachment 11328View attachment 11329View attachment 11330View attachment 11331View attachment 11332View attachment 11333View attachment 11334View attachment 11335View attachment 11336View attachment 11337View attachment 11338View attachment 11339View attachment 11340View attachment 11341View attachment 11342View attachment 11343View attachment 11344View attachment 11345View attachment 11346View attachment 11347View attachment 11348View attachment 11349View attachment 11350View attachment 11351View attachment 11352View attachment 11353View attachment 11354View attachment 11355View attachment 11356View attachment 11357View attachment 11358View attachment 11359View attachment 11360View attachment 11361View attachment 11362View attachment 11363View attachment 11364View attachment 11365View attachment 11366View attachment 11367View attachment 11368View attachment 11369View attachment 11370View attachment 11371​

Thank you for your time.

 

[mindcaster]

I apologize in advance for being such a smartass. However this topic *is* important even though it might seem like nitpicking at first because it points at the deep misunderstanding of life that pervades our culture.
Fact: DNA encodes proteins. More than 90 percent of hour proteins are not encoded in DNA.

It is very convenient for marketing that we believe in DNA containing our genetics while it only can encode information or energy to synthesize proteins.
Epigenetics: Observation that the secret behind inheritance and tissue exists, but is not understood at all in mainstream science. It's just mental gymnastics to avoid admitting complete ignorance.

This should be obvious for anyone familiar with basic theory of algorithms and/or information after some deep thinking.

It might even be blatantly obvious for anyone not conditioned to our belief in magical science.

Now what does this really mean scientifically? It means that the information has to be stored elsewhere. There is really not many places where one can store this huge amount of information if at all.

Possible solutions:
Water has some property to store insane amounts of information.
Some field of life retains the information (aka Ether, Chi, Life force, God, Soul)

Best of luck researching this.

Light (not a particle, not a wave) can store information (look up the patents from recent years). All cultures and religions stem from worship of the sun. I think it's safe to lock the Aether into this notion.

 

[Silencedogood]

This fascinates me. I have always questioned history and the logic of warfare in particular. I think we can all agree that lining up to faceoff in warfare with guns, disregarding cover and personal safety in favor of 'tradition' is absolutely ridiculous. On the other hand, if this narrative is true, then the officers ordering soldiers to line up and stand tall in the face of oncoming bullets it makes sense. If wars were all an organized farce between conspirators then it was simply a convenient time to kill off your subjects...

 

[Fawkes]

Hello, this day marks exactly one month since I came to this site. and I was wondering if I am understanding things correctly. Some of you appear to believe Fomenko, about recorded history going back only to about 1000 AD, while others, on this particular thread, think that recorded history began after a massive cataclysm or war sometime between between 1700-1850? It seems that someone keeps pushing "real" history more forward in time. So are you next (or have you already) going to propose that real recorded history did not begin until about the year 2000 (say, after 9/11)? If so, I guess this would mean that myself, and almost everyone else on this site, are some kind of clone/android/worker slave, and don't even realize it!

Please don't get me wrong, I enjoy this site very much, but I was just wondering how much further on in time you intend to go on with this. That being said, I do believe what you are saying about the rise of the "Robber Barons" during the Industrial Revolution, and that they are part of an Elite cabal, that most definitely run the lives of the other 99+% of the population today. Also, generally speaking, I agree with most of the following:

"This power elite has its roots in the Roman Empire. The countries of the Western Roman Empire gradually became huge economic and warlike nations: Italy, Venice, Portugal, Spain, France, Britain, the Netherlands. The first financial center was established in Venice (which was later moved to Switzerland). All those who did not want to submit to the Church were killed or fled towards "Germania". The approach of the church corresponds to the tactics of the Roman conquests. The church then divided the territory and set up its own administrators in these areas. The subsequent emergence of the high nobility, all of them loyal to the church, can be attributed to this. The Roman army was at one point dissolved and divided into knightly orders. Germany, as a stronghold of Protestantism, was able to resist these ecclesiastical forces a little longer, but was also taken over at some point, as was the Moscovite Tartary (the former empire of the Scythians), which was taken over by Russia. Since then, the European powers have all been controlled from behind the scenes by the cabal, and they managed to make it look like Britain, Germany, France, Portugal, Spain and Russia were competing with each other, but they were actually working together.​

​

The Hohenzollern and Orange-Nassau noble families simultaneously controlled Britain, the Netherlands, the German Empire, as well as the Russian Tsarist Empire. The Habsburgs, funded by the Fuggers, controlled Central Europe, the Vatican and parts of Western Europe."​

However, when do you date this original Western Roman Empire, which "historically" fell in 476 AD? Everything that followed took many centuries to accomplish, if one believes traditional chronology, but it looks like you believe Rome "fell" after 1700? Of course the Holy Roman Empire of the Habsburgs was dissolved in 1806, which leaves only 24 years until you say the Industrial Revolution really began, in 1830. However, if you count Queen Marie Antoinette of France as a Habsburg, possibly this "decline and fall of the Roman Empire" began about 15 years earlier, during the French Revolution.

Perhaps this was the massive war or cataclysm that preceded the "fall of Rome", or, even going back half a century more, to 1740, when the Habsburg male line officially became extinct, and Maria Theresa ascended the Habsburg Holy Roman Empire throne, which immediately led to the loss of Silesia. ???

 

[dreamtime]

However, when do you date this original Western Roman Empire, which "historically" fell in 476 AD?

Roughly 1000 years later:

If our Middle Ages have been artificially stretched by seven or more centuries, does that mean that most of it is pure fiction? Not necessarily. Gunnar Heinsohn, using comparative archeology and stratigraphy (explore his articles or watch his video conference), argues that events spread throughout Antiquity, Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages were in fact contemporary. In other words, the Western Roman Empire, the Eastern (Byzantine) Roman Empire, and the Germanic Roman Empire must be resynchronized and seen as parts of the same civilization which collapsed a little more than ten centuries ago, after a global cataclysmic event that caused a commotion of memory and a taste for apocalyptic salvation cults.​

How Fake Is Church History? (Part 2/3, Unz review)

But in contrast to Heinsohn, I don't think it happened 1000 years ago, but 500 years ago - exactly at the time where historians put the fall of Byzantine Rome.

Also look into this thread: How Long Was the First Millennium? (Part 3/3, Unz review)

The cataclysm is encrypted in the story of the Witch Hunts, the Thirty-Years War, the Reformation, and the church schisms happening everywhere in the world.

After the fall of "Rome", people tried to reconnect to this past with the "Holy Roman Empire", which was also called the "Old Empire".

According to official history, the Old Empire formed shortly after the cataclysm proposed by me (based on Heinsohn's concept of the three synchronized Roman Empires) that ended the Roman Empire in Europe:

If we try to categorize what had formed around 1500 and will remain in its basic features until 1806 according to common types of states, the Old Empire possessed a mixed constitution: It had monarchical features (monarchy = one-man rule - the head of the empire! ), certainly "emperor and empire" formed also and above all an aristocratic association of persons (aristocracy = rule of the best, according to pre-modern view thus of the high nobility - the Reichstag as plenary assembly of the imperial estates!), furthermore the constitution of the empire had fluctuating, but at times very pronounced oligarchic contents (oligarchy = rule of few - the prominent role of the seven to nine electors!).​

Wie funktionierte das Alte Reich? | bpb

I suggest there were two distinct events - one big cataclysm between 1300 and 1600, followed by a post-cataclysm war period, culminating in the recent reset some call the mudflood (which was most likely some kind of fallout from a world war around 200 years ago), followed by the industrial revolution.

Look into Christoph Pfister, who further elaborates on the research of Fomenko, Kammeier and others: The Matrix of Ancient History

He places the beginning of modern history into the time around 1800 - before this all the dates are not factual, but mythological and symbological.

 

[Fawkes]

But in contrast to Heinsohn, I don't think it happened 1000 years ago, but 500 years ago - exactly at the time where historians put the fall of Byzantine Rome.

After the fall of "Rome", people tried to reconnect to this past with the "Holy Roman Empire", which was also called the "Old Empire".

From a strictly historical viewpoint, yes, Byzantine Rome fell on May 29, 1453, and Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Frederick III had been crowned in Rome by Pope Nicholas V the year before, on March 19, 1452, but I don't recall the Habsburg Roman Empire being called the "Old Empire".

"In late spring of 1452 Byzantine Emperor Constantine XI wrote to Pope Nicholas for help against the impending siege by Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II. Nicholas issued the bull Dum Diversas (18 June 1452) authorizing King Alfonso V of Portugal (the brother-in-law of Emperor Frederick III) to "attack, conquer, and subjugate Saracens, pagans and other enemies of Christ wherever they may be found". Issued less than a year before the fall of Constantinople, the bull may have been intended to begin another crusade against the Ottoman Empire.]" Pope Nicholas V​

​

"It was not until Alfonso V of Portugal responded to a Papal call for aid against the Turks that Pope Nicholas V agreed to support the Portuguese claims regarding territory in Africa. Although some troops arrived from the mercantile city-states in the north of Italy, Pope Nicholas did not have the influence the Byzantines thought that he had over the Western kings and princes. France and England were both weakened by the Hundred Years' War, and Spain was still engaged in conflict with Islamic strongholds in Iberia. Any western contribution was not adequate to counterbalance Ottoman strength." Dum Diversas​

So Byzantine Rome fell and the Habsburgs took over with the "Old" Holy Roman Empire. Something looks funny here to me. Were Pope Nicholas V and King Alfonso V "allowing" Byzantine Rome to "fall", so that their candidate and relative in the West, the Habsburg Roman Emperor Frederick III, could take over with a new/"Old" Roman Empire?

 

[dreamtime]

but I don't recall the Habsburg Roman Empire being called the "Old Empire".

After the unification of Germany as a nation state in 1871, the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation was also known as the Old Empire (First Reich) while the new empire was known as the New Empire, second Empire, or Second Reich. ​

Holy Roman Empire - New World Encyclopedia

Were Pope Nicholas V and King Alfonso V "allowing" Byzantine Rome to "fall", so that their candidate and relative in the West, the Habsburg Roman Emperor Frederick III, could take over with a new/"Old" Roman Empire?

Have you read the 3-part series I linked to?

 

[Safranek]

So Byzantine Rome fell and the Habsburgs took over with the "Old" Holy Roman Empire. Something looks funny here to me. Were Pope Nicholas V and King Alfonso V "allowing" Byzantine Rome to "fall", so that their candidate and relative in the West, the Habsburg Roman Emperor Frederick III, could take over with a new/"Old" Roman Empire?

Does this tactic not accurately reflect the sequence of events of how the Soviet Empire was allowed to fall and be further privatized and controlled more covertly?

Controllers know that as people grow wise to the damage done by them and would start to consider to act upon it, a 'convincing' new paradigm has to be created to distract the populace into thinking that changes for the better have been made. Of course, as we can see through history, this is only temporary and must be renewed continously.

 

[Fawkes]

Have you read the 3-part series I linked to?

Did you not post "And when, after 1453, the last bearers of Constantinople’s high culture fled Ottoman rule, many came to contribute to the blooming of the Italian Renaissance. ... practically all the archives of the imperial and patriarchal chanceries of Byzantium perished either in 1204, when the city was sacked by the Crusaders, or in 1453, when it fell under the Turks.[40] Byzantium was killed twice: after sacking it in 1204, the Latin West strove to erase it from its collective memory." I thought that we might be in agreement about what historically happened on the surface in 1452/1453, and was trying to build a hypothetical bridge from what I already knew historically, to your theory, as this is all completely new to me. This is why I am "cherry picking" from your exhaustive work, for now, by focusing on what is immediately familiar to me, as it is a lot to take in and digest on a first reading, which is actually a compliment to the depth of your research, whether I eventually agree with all of it or not.

Controllers know that as people grow wise to the damage done by them and would start to consider to act upon it, a 'convincing' new paradigm has to be created to distract the populace into thinking that changes for the better have been made. Of course, as we can see through history, this is only temporary and must be renewed continously.

Thank You, this just about explains what I was theorizing about what might have happened "historically" in 1452/1453, but you expressed it much more clearly than I, the "new kid on the block"!

 

[asatiger1966]

Hello, this day marks exactly one month since I came to this site. and I was wondering if I am understanding things correctly. Some of you appear to believe Fomenko, about recorded history going back only to about 1000 AD, while others, on this particular thread, think that recorded history began after a massive cataclysm or war sometime between between 1700-1850? It seems that someone keeps pushing "real" history more forward in time. So are you next (or have you already) going to propose that real recorded history did not begin until about the year 2000 (say, after 9/11)? If so, I guess this would mean that myself, and almost everyone else on this site, are some kind of clone/android/worker slave, and don't even realize it!

Please don't get me wrong, I enjoy this site very much, but I was just wondering how much further on in time you intend to go on with this. That being said, I do believe what you are saying about the rise of the "Robber Barons" during the Industrial Revolution, and that they are part of an Elite cabal, that most definitely run the lives of the other 99+% of the population today. Also, generally speaking, I agree with most of the following:

"This power elite has its roots in the Roman Empire. The countries of the Western Roman Empire gradually became huge economic and warlike nations: Italy, Venice, Portugal, Spain, France, Britain, the Netherlands. The first financial center was established in Venice (which was later moved to Switzerland). All those who did not want to submit to the Church were killed or fled towards "Germania". The approach of the church corresponds to the tactics of the Roman conquests. The church then divided the territory and set up its own administrators in these areas. The subsequent emergence of the high nobility, all of them loyal to the church, can be attributed to this. The Roman army was at one point dissolved and divided into knightly orders. Germany, as a stronghold of Protestantism, was able to resist these ecclesiastical forces a little longer, but was also taken over at some point, as was the Moscovite Tartary (the former empire of the Scythians), which was taken over by Russia. Since then, the European powers have all been controlled from behind the scenes by the cabal, and they managed to make it look like Britain, Germany, France, Portugal, Spain and Russia were competing with each other, but they were actually working together.​

​

The Hohenzollern and Orange-Nassau noble families simultaneously controlled Britain, the Netherlands, the German Empire, as well as the Russian Tsarist Empire. The Habsburgs, funded by the Fuggers, controlled Central Europe, the Vatican and parts of Western Europe."​

However, when do you date this original Western Roman Empire, which "historically" fell in 476 AD? Everything that followed took many centuries to accomplish, if one believes traditional chronology, but it looks like you believe Rome "fell" after 1700? Of course the Holy Roman Empire of the Habsburgs was dissolved in 1806, which leaves only 24 years until you say the Industrial Revolution really began, in 1830. However, if you count Queen Marie Antoinette of France as a Habsburg, possibly this "decline and fall of the Roman Empire" began about 15 years earlier, during the French Revolution.

Perhaps this was the massive war or cataclysm that preceded the "fall of Rome", or, even going back half a century more, to 1740, when the Habsburg male line officially became extinct, and Maria Theresa ascended the Habsburg Holy Roman Empire throne, which immediately led to the loss of Silesia. ???

The attached article is more about slavery but helps explain the roman Empire and when and if they fell apart.

Get Your Visigoth On Posted: 05 Dec 2021 02:23 PM PST By Anna Von Reitz I love Clif High, and treasure every video he does, not only for the mind-freeing wealth of information and insight he provides, but because he fills in more of the Dirty Missing Pieces of our common history, and sheds light on the European History that supports everything that I have been talking about for decades in America. Slavery is not an American Problem. Slavery was brought to our shores by European interests. Slavery in this country began not with black slaves from Africa, but with Irish slaves, who were not treated as well as the African slaves. The Irish were simply worked to death and piled up like cordwood and built into the causeways of New York. Food was considered a luxury. Housing was non-existent. In the winter, they froze, and in the spring, a new crop of Irish slaves was imported. The Southern Plantation owners were enlightened and humane by comparison to the Dutch and British merchants. We know this, we take it for granted, that slavery was part of the early history of this country and it is also taken for granted that slavery was the cause of The American Civil War --- which is only partially true, but certainly the nobler part of the provocation. What Clif High brings to the table is a broader view of the history of slavery covering the Byzantine Empire which together with Rome comprised the slavery-loving Holy Roman Empire and the anti-slavery forces of the Saxons, Friesians, Angles, and other Celtic-Germanic people. The Saxons and their Allied Peoples hated slavery and the way it degraded Mankind and they would not suffer its presence, so they warred against it then and they continue to war against it now, while the progeny of the Holy Roman Empire who make their money from slavery and the sin of name-stealing, continue to promote these evils in our midst. Long, long before the Roman Catholic sponsored Municipal Government of the United States cast its lot with The Confederate States of America, both Rome and its Eastern Cousin, Byzantium, were leading proponents of slavery and made the bulk of their money from slavery and accrued the larger part of their coercive political power from slavery. As Public Awareness and Public Opinion against slavery grew, the perpetrators were obliged to adopt ever-more deceitful means to accomplish their ends, and both the Roman Church and their cohorts in Constantinople backpedaled trying to redefine their ardent support of slavery in terms of being "slaves of Christ" ---- but a simple glance at history proves otherwise. There is and there was nothing at all "Christian" about their practice of slavery, a fact that led to the Holy Roman Empire officially biting the dust on the 6th of August 1806 ---- officially. Unofficially, the Holy Roman Empire carried on with hardly a ripple in its internecine activities, just as the Office of the Roman Pontiff and Romanus Pontifex Trusts purportedly dissolved in 2011 have continued unabated despite all the handwashing and asset shuffling. And behind the scenes the Pope's Men and the Eastern Orthodox Minions have been instrumental in institutionalizing slavery throughout the world and in undermining the League of Nations (which outlawed slavery worldwide in 1926) and replacing it with the slavery-compliant United Nations Organization. Was it the discovery of this Dirty Secret that led to the murder of United Nations Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold? Like JFK, he should have just made the speech and told us instead of talking about making the speech. Take a good look at the so-called (unauthorized) Fourteenth Amendment to The Constitution of the United States of America, which immediately follows their Thirteenth Amendment ----which appears to unilaterally abolish slavery. With one breath they "abolish slavery" and with the next, they permanently institutionalize it. Slavery is abolished....except in the public sector.... and oh, yes, criminals are slaves, and we get to define what constitutes crime.... What shameful, despicable double-speak. Generations of honest Americans have looked at these Amendments and been unable to read them because of the complexity and deceitfulness of the verbiage. They've also been deceived into thinking that these Amendments were approved and ratified by their States of the Union --they never were -- and many Americans still assume that The Constitution of the United States of America applies to them, instead of applying to our erstwhile British Territorial Employees. Throughout the history of the Western World for the past 3,000 years, Rome and all its various acolytes, subsidiaries, outposts, and bureaucracies, has been the Source of Slavery and the primary force perpetuating it. If we did nothing but expose the rot at the heart of the Roman Catholic Church, the Roman Municipal Government, and the United Nations, we would accomplish much for the good of humanity, but it isn't enough to expose the bad. We must also appreciate what is good, and support it. The Anglo-Saxon resistance to slavery and enslavement has stood for two thousand years and every time the Romans and Byzantines think they have it all wrapped up the way they like it, we blow them to Hell again. If your family roots stem from Northern Europe, and even if they don't, please take time to learn about the long and bitter fight against slavery that has been at the root of so much suffering and strife, the same fight that is at the root of the current miasma, and the same fight against this evil that they are now attempting to enforce as "medicine" and "science". The entire remaining Roman Empire--- "Holy" or not --- is motivated by nothing more than lust, self-interest, and greed, and it is held together by nothing more than snake-oil and statutory laws that don't apply to living beings, plus deluded men running around in black robes still collecting taxes for a non-existent Caesar. It's time to eviscerate the Roman Empire---and the slavery it promotes--- in any form, once and for all. Get your Visigoth on. Please listen carefully to this timely video by Clif High for a Yule Time insight into the holidays and the history that most Americans don't know and which we desperately need to know: View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/AS0Fd5oNTXYS/