"Tartaria" is a myth and didn't exist

The main instigator of the Tartaria theory seems to have been Fomenko as far as I can tell. I always got the sense there is a Russian nationalist undercurrent to it, and Fomenko continues to be employed as a professor by Moscow State University, so clearly the Russian establishment approve of his theories.

Personally I think the promotion of the Tartaria theory suits current Russian geopolitical agendas, such as their Eurasianist agenda. The idea of reviving the Soviet Union (which is basically the aim of Eurasianism) has a bad rep with many people for obvious reasons, so I would think it suits them to paint a narrative that Russia being united with the Central Asian states and having close relations with China, etc, has a much more ancient historical precedent.

That said, I wouldn't completely write off Tartaria as a theory, there's enough evidence that has been unearthed that there's clearly something to it, but I think the way it's frequently portrayed by Russian researchers as an ancient Russian/Slavic empire is baseless and is really taking it out of context to benefit modern nationalist and geopolitical agendas.

If Tartaria did exist, the most probable scenario seems to me that it was the Russian Slavs who destroyed it in their Eastward expansion/empire building. It's also interesting that the regions of modern day China with the highest levels of authoritarianism and controls, Tibet and Xinjiang, correspond to the regions that used to be part of Tartaria. This makes me more inclined to think what has happened to those regions is part of a cover up.
How in the world is there a Russian nationalist undercurrent to it when the Tartarians wouldn't even be Russian? You even stated at the end that the most probable scenario to you would be that it was destroyed by Russian Slavs during the Eastward expansion. If anything this would cause nationalism in the areas of what was Tartary (regardless of whether or not the people there can still be called Tartarians). I can see the Russian academic community keeping his employment when you consider that the Soviet Union made it a business of rewriting the history. I'm not sure how his continued employment counts as approval by the Russian establishment though.
 
Perhaps Tartary was the land of the Tatars and Gingis Kan? (In the west Tartar and Tatar are used interchangeably). This would make the most sense. Further, consider the fact that today’s history books don’t paint the right picture about Tatars, the Huns, Scythians, Parthians, the descendants of Sumerians. At one point these people shared the same belief system, language and alphabet. There’s not just a theory , but also evidence, that they were not primitive nomadic people. In fact they were very sophisticated, possessed advanced technologies , ran a fair and efficient social system and were written about by Alexander the Great , the Romans and others with high admiration. I would go down the Sumerian-Scythian -Hun rabbit hole to find answers to the “tartarian” question. Their story stretches the entire Asian continent. And much of Europe .
 
I remember posting about this once. The victorian buildings are nowhere to be found in the land where Tartary was supposed to be.
A uncanny theory would be that these buildings simply vanished, due to some tesla-like teleport technology, and were sent to the inner Earth. But it is just speculation and there is not a conclusive proof such thing could have happened.
There were also the pyramids indicated in a map, and buried star forts, but there are no excavations happening in those areas, so we can't know for sure what could have happened. We can only speculate, and here lies the problem, because the more you speculate, the more you run in circles. Today I think it would be better to pay attention to current events, because the amount of lies we are seeing now certainly happened before, not just the spanish flu, but events in the 19th century as well. Fact is, we will never know true history, because it was falsified several times.

Another argument is that judging by pictures we see, Tartarians lived in tents. Even in North America, there are reports of them having lived in tents.

So who the hell built all those huge structures?
 
How in the world is there a Russian nationalist undercurrent to it when the Tartarians wouldn't even be Russian? You even stated at the end that the most probable scenario to you would be that it was destroyed by Russian Slavs during the Eastward expansion. If anything this would cause nationalism in the areas of what was Tartary (regardless of whether or not the people there can still be called Tartarians). I can see the Russian academic community keeping his employment when you consider that the Soviet Union made it a business of rewriting the history. I'm not sure how his continued employment counts as approval by the Russian establishment though.
I like your thinking. One needs to understand that Russia always hated their neighbor, Scythia/Tartary. So, Fomenko isn't hurting Russia when he speaks of Tartary ... as long as he doesn't present what REALLY happened when Russia expanded toward the east. It just shows the power of Russia. I believe that other nations worked with Russia to finally eliminate Grand Tartary. And then they re-wrote history accordingly.
Another argument is that judging by pictures we see, Tartarians lived in tents. Even in North America, there are reports of them having lived in tents.

So who the hell built all those huge structures?
The Scythians/Israelites DID live in tents. They were nomadic. But as their nation grew, and they planted roots, their tents were left in history. The Israelites, who came from the seedline of Seth, were prophesied to be the tillers of the soil, or Farmers. They were to prosper as Farmers; and that takes planting yourself in one spot. Whereas Cain's offspring, The Cainites/Kenites/Edomites (ultimately Judeans/Jews) became the wandering peoples who became the Bankers of the earth.
 
Last edited:
What.png
???
 
How can Tartary be a myth if it was a country with its own flag, coat of arms and language?

It even had a capitol city. Sellingham.
 
How can Tartary be a myth if it was a country with its own flag, coat of arms and language?

Because the headline was a bit hyperbole, as explained in the post. The word "myth" is correct though, as the premise of my text relates to the idea people in the alternative history community have about Tartary, not Tartary itself.
 
We can also consider that these new, alternative stories are just as 'bad' for our mental health as the official narrative - that may be they too were placed there as 'Plan Bs'. We confer advantage to others when we believe rather than verify (or just hold as a hypothesis without committing).
Yes, verification is everything. Hopefully, we have a mature enough community here, that no realm of research or speculation is "dangerous," since it is an easy given that we do not have all the answers and are often reaching at best with what little actual facts we have at our disposal to work with. Anyone entering this research community for the first time can quickly conclude that this is a place to exchange ideas, theories, speculations, and hypothesis, where conclusions must be left to the individual, as this is an open source community, the very opposite of the traditional approach of academia, where hired court "historians" fabricate false history to fit in with larger nefarious corporate agendas and must be repeated at all costs, shutting down and censoring all efforts at open investigation.
 
I’d like to approach this topic by considering its historical precedents. It may well be a ‘meme’ in today’s jargon, but historically a meme is just a concept. ‘Hoover’ became the meme or name for the concept of the vacuum cleaner. In Spain, ‘Rimmel’ is the meme for the concept of mascara. Similarly ‘Tartaria’ has become the name for a concept concerning the existence of a previous worldwide civilisation. However, like all concepts, it has evolved and is now inextricably entwined with a worldwide cataclysmic ‘mudflood’ that caused its downfall; a Reset that replaced the civilisation’s social and administrative systems; the loss of a particular style of advanced architecture labelled ‘Tartarian’; the loss of ancient free-energy technology labelled ‘Antiquitech’ and finally ‘Orphan Trains’ that everyone who survived the cataclysm is descended from.

The main point of the OP seems to be an objection to the word ‘Tartaria’ as a name for the concept outlined above. However, the title of the OP, ‘“Tartaria” is a myth and didn’t exist’ is very misleading. After just five paragraphs this is refuted in the OP itself:

While Tartary itself was real, it was not what many people now think it was. I do think there once was a unified civilization, with a unified architecture. But "Tartary" is a wrong name for it.

It’s interesting that the word ‘Tartaria’ is now being replaced by ‘Tartary’, but they refer to the exact same thing.

Further confusion is apparent in the paragraph;

If anything, Tartary should be understood as a symbol for forgotten knowledge - that's why we have the Tartary Griffin in our logo.

This implies that the Tartary / Tartarian Griffin is a perfectly acceptable symbol to represent the concept of “forgotten knowledge” and yet the actual word ‘Tartaria’ is not acceptable for the concept of an ancient lost worldwide civilisation. This apparent contradiction combined with the statement that Tartary / Tartaria was real, makes for a quite confusing post which many may see (and in fact are seeing) as being merely an issue of semantics or even nitpicking. The underlying concept of ‘Tartaria’ and all of its attendant theories are not being challenged, which makes the OP title more than hyperbole and seems like a sensational gutter-press type of attention-grabbing headline that bears little or no relation to the content.

With regard to the historical precedents, the first of these is the Israelites meme or concept. The monumental crimes perpetrated by the early Christian scribes when they went to great lengths to make all the ancient oral traditions fit in with the biblical narrative, are the people we have to thank for the Israelites concept. This happened everywhere throughout what is now the Christian world, but one particular instance that has survived and is well documented occurred in Ireland.

The 12th century "Leabhar Gabhála" manuscript, known as the "The Book of the Taking of Ireland', was written in Irish Gaelic and claimed to give the early history of Ireland. It supposedly documents all of the successive invasions that took place until the arrival of the ‘sons of a thousand from the kingdom of Breogán’, also known as ‘The Sons of Mil’ or actually - the Spanish.

“The writers sought to create an epic written history comparable to that of the Israelites in the Old Testament of the Bible. This history was also intended to fit the Irish into Christian world-chronology and connect them to Adam. In doing so, it links them to events from the Old Testament and likens them to the Israelites. Ancestors of the Irish were described as enslaved in a foreign land, fleeing into exile, and wandering in the wilderness, or sighting the "Promised Land" from afar. The account also drew from the pagan myths of Gaelic Ireland but reinterpreted them in the light of Christian theology and historiography.” Source

The bit about sighting the Promised Land from afar was from the Spanish story, whereby some suitably biblical-like character claimed he could see Ireland all the way from La Coruña in Galicia.

Thomas F. O'Rahilly, a noted Irish scholar, claimed that the purpose of The Book of the Taking of Ireland was:

“firstly to unite the population by obliterating the memory of previous and different ethnic groups, secondly to weaken the influence of pre-Christian pagan religions by converting their gods into mere mortals, and thirdly to manufacture pedigrees into which the various dynastic groups could conveniently be fitted.”​

So you could say that this Israelite concept or meme, was designed to obliterate and reset a previous civilisation and replace it with a new one… where have I heard that before?

This process happened all over Europe, Great Britain, Ireland and Scandinavia (even in America much more recently with the Mormon Church) and in my opinion, explains the total bloody mess we have now, with everyone claiming that the Holy Land is in their own back yard.

Another concept is the Lost Tribes of Israel meme, which has already appeared in this thread. Belief in the Lost Tribes of Israel concept is a matter of blind faith, because there is actually no evidence to support it. Rather than spending a lot of time presenting the research behind this I offer these links to satisfy the doubtful, of whom I’m sure there will be plenty:

Due to the effects of the previous Israelites meme, people were only too keen to be members of one of the ‘Lost Tribes’ so that they too could be one of God’s chosen people, guaranteed of 5 star accommodation in heaven. In much the same way, people today are very keen to be ‘Tartarians’ or decendants of the ‘Orphan Trains’…

The theory reflects a cultural discontent with modernism, and a supposition that traditional styles are inherently good and modern styles are bad.

The conversion of all ancient oral tradition into Christain chronology when combined with the Lost Tribes of Israel meme subsequently spawned many theories regarding the origin of different races, peoples and nations. These theories took the Israelites and Lost Tribes memes as ‘gospel’ – literally – and used it as the basis for their new histories. This has resulted in total historical chaos and the virtual obliteration of all pre-Christian civilisations which have been replaced by theories claiming that most of the known world is populated by people from the Lost Tribes of Israel.

The difference is they didn’t get there in Orphan Trains.

These previous two ancient memes were specifically designed to conceal “forgotten knowledge.” Maybe the latest ones are no different?

It isn’t possible to separate the Tartaria concept from the Mudflood / Reset / Antiquitecture / Star Forts / Orphan Trains etc. because they are all parts of the same concept, in my opinion. With the worldwide Mudflood cataclysm and Reset being brought ever nearer to our own era, it is burying what its proponents claim to be the evil and wicked ‘mainstream history’. All historical events and characters from before the mudflood / reset are considered fictional. So, rather than researching such information as is available and analysing it in the awareness that it is concealing the truth, now anyone can become fully qualified in alternative history simply by watching a few Youtube videos. Anyone can join a forum and either echo the opinions of some Youtube Guru or debunk theories by those who might have been researching for years by simply parroting the Youtube mantras and claiming ‘it’s all fiction’. This situation is now evident in stolenhistory.net.

This is a mirror of the Scamdemic event, or the COVID-19 meme if you prefer. On the one hand there are people who are content and even happy to go along with the media misinformation and lies and echo all of the opinions about vaccine deniers, 'negationistas', etc., whilst others do their own research, think for themselves and draw their own conclusions.

The second and third editions of the presumably official forum videos have been aimed precisely at a specific ‘Tartarian’ concept audience and they are directly responsible for why...

we got many new users during the last months, some from Youtube

It’s a shame that these new members will never realise that they are being played like puppets dancing to the master’s tune. The Tartaria meme will and is already concealing as much, if not more, history than the ancient memes above ever did. What will it be replaced with - a medical tyranny maybe or Tartarus - literally hell on earth?

It’s my opinion that these memes create fanatics who are blind to reason and have no interest in evidence or discussion, only preaching. This is why I will not be contributing to this thread again, so you can all have a field-day content in the knowledge that I won’t be refuting your counterclaims.

Adios.
 
This implies that the Tartary / Tartarian Griffin is a perfectly acceptable symbol to represent the concept of “forgotten knowledge” and yet the actual word ‘Tartaria’ is not acceptable for the concept of an ancient lost worldwide civilisation.

No it doesnt, in my view. People often do not use Tartary as a symbol, but literally as a unified world civilization. Some may mean it symbolically, but then the question is, why the name at all, since there is no connection between Tartary and the proposed world-spanning civilization. Contrary, the fact that the country Tartary got erased from history somewhat is true, thus using it's flag as a symbol for erased history is fitting. The fascination for Tartary originally came from the fact that no one remembered it, and yet there it is on old maps from as young as 250 years. Then the concept broadened to imply a unified world civilization, for which there are no indications in history at all.
 
I apologize if I might upset some Judeo (Jewish)-Christians, because they love the Edomites of Judea (called Israel since 1948). But they are not Israel. They are a highly miscegenated people with the blood of Cain and Esau in their bodies. They are Satan's supplanters of the name Israel. They have the bulk of Christianity fooled into thinking they are Israel, so that they can do anything they want ... with the blessings of Christianity. It has been this way since the end of WW2.

I can't get into it here, because it isn't the place for it. So, please look at my research. The answers are there. When you go to my MeWe group; "The Adam and The Israelites," you can start with "Who Are The Jews."

This is a very deep rabbit hole. And it takes time to grasp the facts that exist, both in secular history and Scriptural history. Judeo-Christians have lived a life of indoctrination, which tell them that The Rabbis are good. They aren't.

You don't need to come back later and tell me what you think about my studies. I just hope that you will take the time to thoroughly read the material that I have carefully written. Of course, if you are not a White European, you will automatically reject my information. But even if you disagree with my theology, you might at least grasp the fact that The Edomite Judeans/Jews ARE NOT Israel. They are behind The New World Order. And it isn't just The Judeans/Jews who are of the Edomite seedline. The Edomites are in the top levels of many organizations, and churches, including The Jesuits and Freemasonry.


I suggest you start a thread. Excuse me if you already have.
 
So the tartar strait, tartar wall of Peking, todays ta'tar people etc. was just a joke or something? There are cities all over the maps. And different peoples. Novosibirsk means New siberia. Someone clearly lived there since there are mirror storus of siberia/tartary as to them of northern americas. They also had big cities.

Just to have the name tartar strait is not that convincing.
Regarding the Tartar wall of Peking; do we have any original old text talking about this as built by superior tartars? Perhaps it was built by chinese to stop the nomad tartar people to come in? hence the name tartar wall. I am not saying it was, just need some old sources talking about it, not just the word on some postcards etc.

The tartar people of today is no joke. But we can argue to have "saharian people" as well at a vast land of africa. It doesnt mean Sahara was an empire.

EDIT:
Sahara/Sahari/Sahrawi = Arabic for desert, wasteland with sand..
Tartari.... wasteland with some trees? :)
 
Last edited:
Just to have the name tartar strait is not that convincing.
Regarding the Tartar wall of Peking; do we have any original old text talking about this as built by superior tartars? Perhaps it was built by chinese to stop the nomad tartar people to come in? hence the name tartar wall. I am not saying it was, just need some old sources talking about it, not just the word on some postcards etc.

The tartar people of today is no joke. But we can argue to have "saharian people" as well at a vast land of africa. It doesnt mean Sahara was an empire.

EDIT:
Sahara/Sahari/Sahrawi = Arabic for desert, wasteland with sand..
Tartari.... wasteland with some trees? :)

There are old maps that show tartaria as anything but a wasteland. Quite the contrary, it shows Tartaria as a populated area.
 
There are old maps that show tartaria as anything but a wasteland. Quite the contrary, it shows Tartaria as a populated area.
Yes, there were people there. But it was a wasteland.. as in no cities or roads(?).
If it was an empire with large organized administration, it would easily reach the coastlines to build harbours. Instead the most organized properties if any seems to be very old attempts of plundering chinese cities. Then disappeared and left some spots with people still called tartars.
 
Yes, there were people there. But it was a wasteland.. as in no cities.
If it was an empire with large organized administration, it would easily reach the coastlines to build harbours. Instead the most organized properties if any seems to be very old attempts of plundering chinese cities. Then disappeared and left some spots with people still called tartars.

So how do they explain the presence of Tartarian tribes on North American soil?
 
Yes, there were people there. But it was a wasteland.. as in no cities or roads(?).
If it was an empire with large organized administration, it would easily reach the coastlines to build harbours. Instead the most organized properties if any seems to be very old attempts of plundering chinese cities. Then disappeared and left some spots with people still called tartars.

Now you sound like dustin in his latest "debunk" where he states "we may never know the truth of tartaria" and right after he puts his hands in a pyramid shape and praise "the most high". No other critisism than that, he and nickels have made some interesting videos earlier. But saying things like that they roamed the dessert and sacked fortified chinese cities is strange. Especially when you consider that they had harbour cities. Possibly on three coastlines. They fought europe masonic elites and china wasnt the "unified" nation it is today.
I may be wrong though. What do you think of the grids in sibir area? And why is every Czarist era ornament in russia southern / roman?
Screenshot_20220121_192124.jpg
mason riding egyptian style.
 
Last edited:
Just to have the name tartar strait is not that convincing.
Regarding the Tartar wall of Peking; do we have any original old text talking about this as built by superior tartars? Perhaps it was built by chinese to stop the nomad tartar people to come in? hence the name tartar wall. I am not saying it was, just need some old sources talking about it, not just the word on some postcards etc.

The tartar people of today is no joke. But we can argue to have "saharian people" as well at a vast land of africa. It doesnt mean Sahara was an empire.

EDIT:
Sahara/Sahari/Sahrawi = Arabic for desert, wasteland with sand..
Tartari.... wasteland with some trees? :)
Speaking of The Sahara, old maps show that it was very lush.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top