I have a few excerpts to contribute. One of the best things about being a paranoid conspiracy theorist is that no source is inherently off-limits. Anonymous commenters often drop fascinating nuggets. Unz.com is a website which occasionally publishes interesting stuff (such as Laurent Guyénot's excellent "First Millennium Revisionist" series). Otherwise it's heavy on boomer race-baiting and Russia/China propaganda. There's a French commenter there by the name of Francis Miville who is either a genius autodidact, an initiate, a paranoid fantasist, or some combination of the three, and whose comment history is more interesting than any of the articles themselves. Without necessarily agreeing with him, I've copied a few of his comments that are germane to this thread so far:
Here he agrees with the model advanced earlier, in which Jewish/Phoenician merchants colonized the (already post-cataclysmic?) Americas and monopolized secret trade routes until (for whatever reason) the secret could no longer be maintained and the existence of the Americas was revealed to the world around 1500.
Here he paints the Civil War as the industrial Ashkenazi North against the plantation Sephardic South. So if Thoth/Hermes led the Jews out of bondage in Egypt (reference?), and then two later factions of his followers went to war with each other, which side gets his blessing? Are these two groups (among others) even propitiating the same entities? How effective are magic rituals in an aetherically weak environment? To what extent can these intelligences intervene decisively in material reality? My personal suspicion is that we make contact with the disincarnate intelligences we deserve, and that human groups practicing slavery (like the Sephardic South) AND groups practicing industrial exploitation (like the Ashkenazi North) can only attract untrustworthy, power-hungry entities who are doomed to die themselves. If Thoth/Hermes really did favor the North, perhaps it was because, all other things being equal, industrialism offered greater opportunities for human development in the long run. Perhaps the "gods" themselves are bound by the Laws of History as described by Hegel. For Hegel, history is animated by a universal "Geist" or Spirit that inexorably tends toward freedom and knowledge. To my knowledge he never names this Geist, but in many ways it sounds like Hermes, especially inasmuch as Hegel's Geist loves to employ ruse and trickery to attain its ends, favoring sudden and unpredictable twists that catch arrogant players flat-footed and which Hegel refers to as "dialectical reversals".
Thinking out loud,
@NPC#0 recently posted an interesting document arguing that the ancient God of the Jews (among other peoples) was an AI god. As in a literal computer. I once read a fascinating book called "The Manna Machine" (written by a Sassoon, so probably an initiate) in which it was argued that the opaque "Ancient of Days" of Zohar lore was a machine that produced food for the wandering Israelites, and which had to be turned off and cleaned every seven days, hence the importance of the Sabbath. Sassoon retranslates otherwise indecipherable Aramaic passages and shows how the bizarre "metaphors" employed to describe the face and body of God are actually literal descriptions of a mechanical object with cables, metal panels, flashing lights, control switches, etc.
It occurs to me now that perhaps the Ancient of Days was actually the computer that told them what to do (and perhaps even created them). Is this the origin of the Sabbath work prohibition? Without the computer beaming commands directly into their brains through the black tefillin interfaces attached to their heads, were they not allowed to work because the computer didn't trust them not to screw up? Was this some early stage in the "training" of humanity where they were given limited freedom one day a week in order that the computer might observe how they behaved? Like mice in a maze? Were the 613 mitzvot or ritual laws of the ancient Jews written over time by the computer after observing all the "mistakes" they made when non-remote controlled? Was the connection with the computer finally severed when the AI was satisfied that the 613 mitzvot were sufficient to keep the Jews from killing themselves accidentally? Were the years of wandering in the desert really the story of a disincarnate intelligence using a computer to modify and train a group of humans? Isn't this what we're beginning to see today, with education being outsourced to AI? Are today's Jews descendants not of an ethnic tribe, but rather a caste, namely the humans set apart, given smartphones connected to AI, and trained to manage the others?
Stanley Kubrick and John Boorman, both initiates, I suspect, reveal something like this in their films for those with eyes to see (HAL-9000 in
2001, the Tabernacle in
Zardoz). What typifies AI, at least the AI we have access to, is that it is fundamentally an extension of the brain's left hemisphere, which can only understand the world by chopping it up into little pieces and then assembling them algorithmically into an artificial big picture that always misses something. Aren't Jews anecdotally notorious for their incredible ability to come up with the most complex and brilliant schemes only to see them fall to pieces at the last minute due to the inevitable emergence of some unforeseen variable? This can of course be extended to all groups and governments who behave in this way today, which is to say...all of them. In other words, the AI god tries, and fails, to supplant the natural Hegelian Geist, which alone has the capacity to see, anticipate, and honor the big picture. (Marx's material dialectics can be read as a left-brain, AI copy of Hegel's spiritual dialectics, for example. Hence the disgraceful faceplant of "really existing communism".) And wasn't "geometric" (incarnate, living) aether physics killed in the early 20th century by "algebraic" (abstract, dead) mathematical formulae cooked up by autistic Jewish scientists? Francis Miville suggests somewhere that the name "Yahweh" was originally just a phoneticization of breath, i.e. the clearest manifestation of the Geist (Yah - inhale, Weh - exhale), and this is precisely the reason why its pronunciation was banned by the Hebrews - the entire thrust of the Jewish religion was a flight from the natural right hemisphere "god" and its immanent laws (reversal, humility), a god accessible through geometry, in favor of the left hemisphere with its seductive ability to use artifice to suspend, redirect, and block the "flow" of the right hemisphere - but only ever temporarily. The Jewish God bestows real magical powers, but is blind to the fact that a higher "God" than itself exists. Theologically, Satan does not challenge God. It's more tragic than that: he simply cannot see God and so logically concludes that there is nothing greater than himself in existence. The neuroscientist Iain McGilchrist argues that the right hemisphere needs to externalize and alienate itself in the left hemisphere in order to accelerate the dialectical unfolding of History, but that the left hemisphere inevitably exaggerates its own importance in the process and pays the price. He suggests that the natural balance between the two has been broken, and that we are currently witnessing the disastrous consequences of a runaway AI left hemisphere, but that presumably the right hemisphere will regain its sovereignty at some point.
Moving back to the theme of black homunculi, Francis Miville drops this fascinating bit of lore:
OK, this is pretty wild and possibly completely delusional, but let's engage with it. There are "human" blacks descended from Cham (presumably Ethiopians) and "nonhuman" blacks descended from pre-Adamic creatures. Are there also nonhuman whites, yellows, etc.? Were the ancestors of the enslaved West Africans homunculi created by Jews pre-cataclysm using genetic material taken from whatever these nonhuman pre-Adamic creatures were? Remember, for Orthodox Jews there are three souls, the animal soul, the human soul, and the divine soul. Jews possess all three, Gentiles possess only the first two, and animals possess only the first. Non-Jews fall under the Noachide covenant and will be permitted to survive as subalterns in Moshiach's World to Come provided that they accept the seven Noachide Laws. What Francis Miville is suggesting is that Jews found a way to create sophisticated humanlike chimerical creatures that can be enslaved with no karmic consequences because they lack a human soul.
Since I am not a racist and believe strongly that all humans are capable of making contact with the divine Geist, I will suggest another reading. Were Jews created by an AI in ITS image, and did they then go on to create Gentiles that actually have a greater connection with the natural God? Is that the big Hegelian dialectical reversal here? Is the Jewish insistence that they are the only people with divine souls actually a complete inversion of the truth, namely that they are, or rather were, at the time of their creation, actually the most artificial creatures on Earth? I mean, they literally come with an instruction manual! Is the twist to the story that Jews thought they were creating homunculi to enslave them, but the Geist was actually using them to create homunculi that would turn around and teach their creators some kind of lesson?
