The "American Revolution" and the Civil War were the same event

Do you think the Confederacy was actually a confederacy of planets, not just nations? That might be an interesting angle. Obviously when you look at medieval paintings of angels they have wings, which might be a symbol of space flight.

I think the way to go from here is finding which occult books were being written in the South right before the Civil War. There had to be an immediate reason that fighting broke out, and I doubt it was something as asinine as "state's rights" or slavery.

Speaking of slavery, why are all the slaves black? WHY DIDN'T THE SOUTH ENSLAVE NATIVE AMERICAN INDIANS INSTEAD OF ALLEGEDLY IMPORTING BLACKS FROM AFRICA? Something doesn't add up.

You have to remember that plantation owners have a lot of leisure time. Of course an idle southern gentleman is going to spend his weekends reading about magic and religion. I wouldn't be surprised if the Confederacy was basically Hogwarts. If you didn't need to work all day, why WOULDN'T you experiment with psychokinesis or telepathy or evocation rituals? If you have thousands of people with unlimited free time, eventually SOMEONE is going to discover something.
 
Last edited:
Solved the Native American-South connection
 

Attachments

  • 1675585905567526.png
    1675585905567526.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 428
  • 1653698429984.png
    1653698429984.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 329
  • 1655264360798.jpg
    1655264360798.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 339
Solved the Native American-South connection
I, along with others I've known, have a family history of "Native Americans" somewhere back in our bloodline. My story relates to a known and semi famous American ancestor who married a native.

Ever since the advent of cheap dna analysis such as 23 and me these stories have all been seemingly proven false My DNA returns a 0% chance of any native ancestry.

It was some years ago that I became disillusioned with the current accepted historical narrative and stumbled upon alternative theories. It was at this time that I chose to trust what my family and ancestors told me.

I have no doubt that I have native blood.

A few thoughts I've had about this:

-When they say "red man", could that not be describing the celtic/gaullic peoples generally? They have an uncanny ability to turn beet red when angered or from too much sun exposure. They also have a large number of red headed people.

-Of course there are the stories of Eric "the red" coming to America. The norse and celtic people are essentially one and the same.

- Why in the world would so many modern Americans claim decent from native Americans? I find it hard to believe that they would willingly claim this descent as this predates the modern social justice thing that gives points for being minority adjacent.
This would have been done in a time where being related to "savages" wouldn't be very good for social standing.

Anyway, great thread. Thanks for all the info.
 
Red bodypaint might be related to Adam from the Garden of Eden, since it means To Blush.

Strong's #119: 'adam (pronounced aw-dam')

to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:--be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

What I suspect happened is the druids escaped to America and taught the Indians about shape-shifting and astral projection in exchange for food and shelter. If I were a druid who lived in the forest, I obviously would get along with the Native Americans, who share a similar desire to be left alone.

Native American Indians could be Greek settlers from long ago who decided to stay in the New World and their skin turner red from sun exposure. If that were true and they had pre-flood historical records, then the Inquisition would certainly target them, and a contrived Civil War would be an excellent excuse.

All this druid stuff with trees, are trees themselves conscious? Can you communicate with them? Is that the secret? Some trees are very old. The Bible is made of paper and paper comes from trees. Could a tree that is 5000 years old be self-aware? How would you talk to it? Maybe meditating under it?
 
Last edited:
AKA the real American Revolution, as "The Civil War" to hide the fact that the Northern forces were in actuality the Redcoats. This would explain the extreme animus towards Confederate monuments: they would be clues to the fact America lost the Revolution.
I'm thinking it's a tad more complicated and obfuscated than that. While I do entertain the notion that the revolutionary and civil were perhaps one and the same war possibly French Indian and 1812 (which itself if full of all sort of abnormalities and surprise issues) and have for quite some time felt that the issue of the civil was native inhabitants blended come together inconfederation to fight the invader forces who had larger orders of repurposed unlocked antiquitech manufactured at landing sites...

I had always been surprised as a lad and concerned by how the confederate president and Lincoln looked very much identical if not clones or twinsies. Even back in the late 70s and 80s I found it difficult to actually get the full articles of confederation not altered or ommited in parts. In my elementary school private research at Stanford Green, SAL, Hoover and San Jose State I dug and dug to search for what was going on even taking it back on the clock a hundred years... thier were plenty of manuscripts and references to grand houses Roman buildings and other anachronisms that shouldn't be in the states a even with the I believe false story if architectural revisionist neoclassical explanations. There were references to the great farms of the originators of our constitution being a Indian confederation document and Bill of rights even the preamble...and that it was jealously taken the riches of these massive plantations by the incubant invader forces... not just the fish in planting deal, but whole, what we would think modern agrarian farms tech and sizing ...but with a different way to skin a cat so to speak...

Strengthened years later by a Caroline Casey episode describing the grand Estates and homes of the native of the southern states in Roman and Greek architecture BEFORE the (re)arrival of "Europeans". And thier theft and the actually residents and owners being enslaved to tend and keep operating on the land and eststes that was once thiers.. then reprogrammed to believe in a couple generations of illiteracy that they were from far a field across the oceans ...
 
I'm thinking it's a tad more complicated and obfuscated than that. While I do entertain the notion that the revolutionary and civil were perhaps one and the same war
Some other things of note are:
the bluemen of Carolinas.
The black skinned blue eyed people of W.Virginia.
The Prince Modoc maddog of Wales.
The moon eyed people.
The eerie canal state being dug out and repaired nit so much as built.
Some elements of the book of Mormon (masonic as a outward religion but still some truths there).
The shape or existence of ALL the great lakes on early maps with cities and settlements on both sides.
The Roman tin mines of that region.
Plenty of building and golf course and resovouir to cover what fmcoinded be explained bu false narrative arcitexts and "founded" dates.
The seven cities of Cibola around the great Salt lake.
The Nevada basin and the coast line to around four corners in parts
Temples of grand canyon.
The cities under glass and deserts in the western states.
Giants and Clark expedition marring Lincoln speech of giants I Belive in the Dakotas.
The various races and species we might describe the warring and various tribal remnants of the natives In today's racial terms.
Kenoick (sp?) Man And that other one covered up by us army core of engineers and tree planted
Ilse of California the 3 California's
Tartar nor cal to Alaska.
Chinese junk armada lost going to America. The Chinese junk wreck in the desert. The Buddhist temple found by the Spanish Conquistadors. To only have one monk left on thier return some 14 years later. And various other anacronist inconsistencies to prelude the concept that America were very much populated and by diverse what we would call in out frankfurt school concepts of race and religion foreign people since ancient ancient times and the BOIA and tribes and US government is hiding thst together a secret kept.

I'm pretty sure the Americas were Shielded by unnavigatable mud shoals and sink holes for a time and then when something happen to the modle of the realm by controlled flip a switch design or by a mechanical clock like gear matrix it was opened again the olde world (which was the actually the temp new) iniated knew of these cycles or timings or openings to the bifurcated segmented realm (still believe 2 quarter segment completely frozen) they came first with navigators to founded what was left or there and find some freemasonry for repurposement. Then waves of successively increasing numbers and then en masse...
 
Some other things of note are:
the bluemen of Carolinas.
The black skinned blue eyed people of W.Virginia.
The Prince Modoc maddog of Wales.
The moon eyed people.
:They" had idea of what was there and possibly who was there as in antiquity; the americas as I've seen stated in many older hundred or so or greater books and masonic type books or collections was known as Gypt and Israel Zion even eden (though I believe that last one to be either further west in the pacific under the waves or not of the this outter realm but either the ring one around it or some where in its nethers...) they were signaled and "dog whistled" time to go and expand and the various factions and order rose and woke to the quest.


The soildering and campaigns that followed after the freshening up softening up of the "enemy" civilizations and incumbents by various bioweapons programmes to decimate the population I believe down 80 even 90 percent of its holding patterns. like the theory of Pizarro pigs in parts of laflorida a issue that the Carolinas still have floating around in cloud formations and the waters of the sky to still sometimes rain down death sickness and destruction on even modern day floating and shifting andbmeandering as it might.

The colours and similarities of miltary uniforms across the realm also I Belive signals what factions and groups even over national borders was also at odds and why...the red the blue the lesse but still prevent verdant hunter green. Not to be whole con fused with the Nam era plain bdu.
 
...

The colours and similarities of miltary uniforms across the realm also I Belive signals what factions and groups even over national borders was also at odds and why...the red the blue the lesse but still prevent verdant hunter green. Not to be whole con fused with the Nam era plain bdu.
I closing I would say that revolutionary and civil war were deeply related . That the northerners were the invaders and the south a hodgepodge of various arrival native and some new comers banded together to defend thier country.

also like to add the PBS presentstion of Ken burns civil war. A master ( 33 ) piece no doubt, but of a "narrative" structuring awareness creator for thier story and to bring a false awareness with morsels of truth and the skill and reverence the people had but while directing the viewer to believe something great they might not otherwise of taken as truth if revewing the material with out direction even in the dumbest factions and layers of society... I remeber the KQED broadcasts. And by the fourth or perhaps 3rd time around showing years from it s first; there was this curly haired liberal glasses wack job who during a pledge break when in this tangential tirade (sorry if I have done that a bit above I am in a foreign lands for and extended time and lost a few of my communication skills and marbles to boot so to speak forgiveness and follow up queries are required) of the whole civil war so memorable for it not just impact but purpose of destabilizing slave trade and slavery freedom and equality for Americans. To which the president of the channel walked over and said wait what did you just say that is not impetus or even purpose of this civil war. Infact it had little to do with it even at the end. Not long after he was retired and that curly haired Bob Ross looking mofo was at it again with his close camera angle microphone in the call pledge room uninterrupted in his blatant misrepresentation of the war and it purpose for the Newspeak Narrative rising...it soon became a fixture and other were brought in for the pledge breaks to unabashedly state this new narrative as If it was FACT...
 
When they rewrote history, I think they might have been unable to hide fashion trends. Were civilians during the Civil War and the "American Revolution" dressed the same? That might be a clue the events were identical.

As for trees being conscious, there's definitely something to that. I suspect they are sophisticated enough to answer yes/no questions. Kabbalah means to receive and its symbol is a tree. It would be profoundly stupid not to attempt to communicate with them. Druid means tree knower, so what do trees know?

I thought some races were homunculi, but it's possible that melanin is the Mark of Cain and black people were originally white but got gene-edited. I still don't know why there aren't any Asian people in medieval artwork, but there are angels and demons.

Was the medieval period before the fall of man, when space brothers still walked the earth? Maybe what we think of as the medieval period was actually millions of years long when magic and demigods still existed, but then a powerful entity like the Vatican or British Crown or the Taliban wrote them out of history and started paying us in green toilet paper to work as slave labor
 

Attachments

  • th-97.jpeg
    th-97.jpeg
    68.8 KB · Views: 102
what we think of as the medieval period was actually millions of years long when magic and demigods still existed, but then a powerful entity like the Vatican or British Crown or the Taliban wrote them out of history and started paying us in green toilet paper to work as slave labor
Why would It be "millions of years long"? Can't see this being reasonable i'm afraid.
 
According to some the language of the 1783 revwar Paris treaty btwn Britain and the US and allies implies the brits still retained authority.

Treaty of Paris

The confederacy was supported by the british.

Plenty of pro brits in new York, regardless of battlefield results in whatever century.

The schmucks at the troll farms in langley and bangalore can barely keep a lid on their 19 lone gunmen fable, or conduct a worldwide plandemic with 20% resisting, but they can concoct 80 years of history and make it stick?
 
Last edited:
According to some the language of the 1783 revwar Paris treaty btwn Britain and the US and allies implies the brits still retained authority.

Treaty of Paris

The confederacy was supported by the british.

Plenty of pro brits in new York, regardless of battlefield results in whatever century.

The schmucks at the troll farms in langley and bangalore can barely keep a lid on their 19 lone gunmen fable, or conduct a worldwide plandemic with 20% resisting, but they can concoct 80 years of history and make it stick?
What did the "rebel" motif in the South refer to if not rebelling against the British? It's clearly referring to the rebellion of the Jews against the Pharaoh, which is the same thing. The idea of states' rights is the polar opposite of an unelected monarchy. All the artwork of George Washington erecting a pyramid is referring to him being a British/pharaonic agent.

I have been thinking more about the whole homunculus thing and it's possible black people are working for the gnostic archons: the Saudis. Many black people are Muslims, so it would make sense for them to destroy pagan art, history, and statues, which could be construed as idolatry. That would explain why there are gaps in the historical record. I cannot find an example of magic and black people coexisting. They may be like janitors or jailers keeping a lid on the supernatural to prevent Allah from being overthrown. The Civil War/American Revolution seems to have been a physical rebellion against Allah, whoever or whatever that is.

Medieval art has dragons and fireballs and sorcery but no blacks. Ancient Greece had demigods and shape-shifting and immortals but no blacks. There is something we don't know about black people that perhaps the Confederacy did. If angels are all white, that heavily implies some things about black people that go without saying.
 

Attachments

  • images.jpeg
    images.jpeg
    10.5 KB · Views: 162
  • flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.u1.jpg
    flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.u1.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 167
Last edited:
Here's some information about the native tribes of the area that becomes known as the American South and later the Confederacy during the War of Northern Agression/Civil War.

The sources for this post for times prior to 1800 are found on apalacheresearch.com. The Creek author is very meticulous about using original source writings and maps.

Speaking of slavery, why are all the slaves black? WHY DIDN'T THE SOUTH ENSLAVE NATIVE AMERICAN INDIANS INSTEAD OF ALLEGEDLY IMPORTING BLACKS FROM AFRICA? Something doesn't add up.

ALL South American and Caribbean native tribes were enslaved by the Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, French, British, and local slave-trading native tribes starting in 1492 and ending in the early 1800's. The natives that didn't die from overwork ended up dying of disease. A few were lucky enough to run away into the jungle, the mountains, north along the coast, or by boat to the Florida panhandle. The Africans were only brought over en masse when the natives were all already enslaved, dead or gone, to be the labor to work on plantations, etc.

However, things with slavery went differently in what is now known as Northern Georgia. Back then it was known as the Kingdom of Apalache, and the tribes in the surrounding areas were members of the Apalache Conferderacy. The entire area is still referred to as Appalachia today, and the mountains are called the Appalachians.

This kingdom was run by an elite tribe of natives known as Paracusa who had migrated from Peru around 200 BC. They had their homes and temples in the mountains and allowed other tribes to live in the lowlands and valleys of Apalache. They were very tall, with long skulls that were imitated by lesser tribes by flattenning their children's heads. They had mica encrusted temples that probably started the rumors about cities of gold. There was NO slavery allowed in the Kingdom of Apalache or in any surrounding tribes that wanted to be part of the Apalache Confederacy.

During the 1500's the Apalache Confederacy welcomed the persecuted Spanish-speaking Sephardic Jews that had been forced out of Spain by the Spanish Inquisition. The Jews were allowed to live in the Kingdom and mine for gems and precious metals, if they followed the laws. There was no slavery and single men had to marry native wives.

The Spanish themselves tried to set up a few forts, trading posts and churches along the coast, but they were chased out by the Apalache, French and Spanish Jews. The Apalache Confederacy hated the Spanish, since they killed and enslaved native peoples. Many of the tribes had fled Central and South America previously to escape the Spanish.The Confederacy refused to trade with the Spanish and would kill any Spaniard who entered the Kingdom without permission. The Spanish stayed south in Florida, where they continued slavery.

Apalache also welcomed the French Protestant Hugenots who had fled persecution by the Catholics in France, and were not slave owners. The Paracusa/High King converted to Protestant Christianity in the 1570's. They even had an international trade treaty with the King of France.

Outside of the Kingdom of Apalache there was major slave-trading going on all over the South. Many smaller tribes fled west across the mountains to escape slavery. African slaves were imported starting in the mid 1600's, once natives were harder to find.

In the 1600's the British were coming into power and looking for slave labour. Starting in 1610 they hired the Rickohocken tribe to procure slaves for them. The Rickohocken wiped out other tribes in Virginia and Carolina. They would kill whoever wouldn't make a good slave, and then burn the village to the ground. Eventually they were massacred themselves...

There was a major smallpox epidemic in Southeastern North America in 1696. It wiped out approximately 90% of the native population. The Kingdom of Apalache disintegrated, and the Apalache Confederacy reformed into the Creek Confederacy in 1717. It was never the same, of course. The high temples gleaming like gold with mica encrusted walls fell into disuse. The agricultural terraces on the mountainsides became overgrown rocky walls. The various tribal villages in the river valleys lost their individual identities as the scattered remnants of the tribes banded together. Mound villages fell into disrepair and skills were lost. This societal devastation allowed the colonists to make inroads into the native lands with bad treaties, illegal real estate deals and war.

The British still needed someone to procure native slaves for them. The Cherokee took over the nasty business in the 1700's. The Cherokees had worked their way south towards Washington DC from the Great Lakes area they started in. In Georgia and the Carolinas, the Cherokee were repeatedly gifted the lands of the Creek and other tribes through some shady treaties. This understandably caused hard feelings and the Cherokee fought a lot. The Creek Confederacy was at war with the Cherokee at least 40 years, with the British giving weapons to the Cherokee. They finally signed a peace treaty just before the breakout of the French and Indian War.


French and Indian War 1754-1763 -

A conflict between British and French for North America. It was mostly fought around the Great Lakes area. Multiple native tribes backed each side. During the conflict the British moved the French settlers out of Acadia/Newfoundland, many went to Louisiana and became the Cajuns.

The British won the Mid and Southern Atlantic coast, and got Florida from the Spanish in exchange for Cuba. France had to give up land west of the Mississippi River to the British and give up Louisiana and New Orleans to the Spanish. The Spanish left Florida and went to Cuba. There was a related European conflict at the same time called the Seven Years War, and this was part of an overarching peace treaty.


Revolutionary War - 1765-1783

During the Revolutionary War the Patriots paid the Creek Confederacy to fight with them and the British paid the Cherokee to fight with them. The French joined in with the Patriots to protect their own colonists north towards Canada and in Louisiana. (And because they hate the British.)

The Patriots won and founded the 13 colonies under the Articles of Confederation. Later on, in 1789, the Constitution would be adopted to centralize the government.


Louisiana Purchase - 1803

France sold the United States the land west of the Mississippi River, in order to pay for the Napoleonic Wars. The area stretched to Spanish Territory at the Rocky Mountains to the west and Texas to the south, and north to British territory in Canada.

United States settlers wanted to spread north and west into the Great Lakes area. There was friction along the borders. Of course, each side had different native tribes backing them and were being paid to create unrest with the other side.


War of 1812 - 1812-1815

Things came to a head between the British and the United States while the Napoleonic Wars were going on in Europe. The British had been blocking North American ports, searching ships and impressing / kidnapping Americans to work on British ships, all to fight the French. This really pissed off the Americans, so they declared war. But it was really about getting the British out of the part of North America that is now the United States. The United States won, forced the Brits north to Canada. Relationships with native tribes were realigned and (of course) more native land was lost to settlers moving west.


Trail of Tears - 1831-1838

The Georgia Gold Rush started in 1928. This would be the final nail in the coffin for the native tribes of the South. Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830 and the forced removals to Indian Territory began.
Forced removals included:
•Choctaw, crappy treaty terms
•Seminole, after losing Seminole Wars
•Creek, after losing Creek War and shady treaty situation
•Chicasaw, got paid off
•Cherokee, after shady treaty situation

There were (and still are) pockets of each of these tribes left behind, some by treaty and some by hiding. Other individuals had earned citizenship through fighting in one of the numerous wars. But the natives were essentially beaten and gone. The South belonged to the settlers now. They finished moving onto the rest of the native lands. They dug up burial mounds and made collections of Indian artifacts to place in their parlors.

It would be about 20 years later the War of Northern Agression/Civil War was said to begin.


Possible Global Reset - 1840-1848

The information on another thread on the forum (I think by dreamtime) indicates that this time-frame was when the most recent global cataclysm took place. This primarily affected the northern hemisphere. There were floods, mudslides, famine, darkness, pestilence, etc. No history was recorded for eight years.

If this did indeed happen, it could have been a factor in the next conflict. The industrial North would have been hit harder, and been more aggressive.


The War of Northern Aggression / Civil War - 1861-1865

Said to be about slavery, but more about economics. The North was industrial with a higher population, and thought everyone should live the same dirty, frantic lives they did. The South was more agricultural with spread out people, living a more seasonal life.

I personally believe that there were beautiful partially-buried Old World and Moorish buildings all over the South and mid-Atlantic. The kind with tall ceilngs and giant-sized doorways to match the size of the skeletons dug out of burial mounds all over America. I think this war was especially destructive to get rid of these buildings. The war also provided a cover story for the rapid expansion of the railroads westward as the rails were dug out of the dirt by slaves.
 
Continued from my earlier post...

So were the Revolutionary War and the Civil War the same?

The French and Indian War slid right into the Revolutionary War. So pretty much constant fighting between various colonists and natives the whole time of 1754-1783. The American troops were already trained and the British were weakened. Good choice on the Patriots part to push on with the Revolutionary War.

The next reported war in the narrative is the War of 1812. This is a pretty big gap for the premise of the OP. Ongoing fighting against the leftover remnants of the natives and then their forced removal was next.

And that gets us up to the possible global cataclysm. There could be constant war during the resulting famine. OR, is this the reset that creates the Revolutionary War out of word-of-mouth tales, then destroys the leftovers in a single (but extended) conflict called the Civil War?

Also, there are several Confederations mentioned in my tale. The Appalache Confederacy died off, the remnants become the Creek Confederacy. Then the Articles of Confederation for the colonies (which included areas of the old Iriquois Confederation in the north). Then the whole south gets called the Confederacy during the Civil War.

----------

Here's some of your quotes from earlier posts, greatscot, and my thoughts about them:

"Wasn't America allegedly founded by Jews, like Christopher Columbus after the Jewish expulsion in 1492? The leading Confederates were Jews, like Judah P. Benjamin."

There were settlements of Jewish silver, gold and gem miners in the Georgia mountains. These were Sephardic Jews who had fled Spain in 1492 from the Spanish Inquisition. Most went first to North Africa, then South America or the Caribbean. These mining Georgia Jews were likely a large group that fled Cartagena, Columbia, in 1610, fleeing a shipload of Inquisition enforcers coming in from Havana.

[That 1610 date appeared earlier in my post, as the date the Rickohocken tribe started enslaving and selling natives to colonists. There may be a connection to the influx of Jews to the Atlantic coast and the colonial towns. But the Jewish miners in particular were within the confines of the Kingdom of Apalache and could not own slaves. In addition, single men were required to take Native wives.]

---------

"rebel Confederacy flew a Scottish banner with a Christian cross"

"What if southern plantation owners were the mythical druids"

A few tribes in the area were descendants of Scots/Irish/Gaels. Some of the early watercolors by the French show native clothing very remiscent of tartan, kilts and tam-o-shams.

From A History of Georgia: From Its First Discovery . . . [1847] by William Bacon Stevens: around 1160-1180 AD, the Scandinavian and Gaelic Christians in Ireland and Scotland were forced to choose conversion to Roman Catholicism, death

or fleeing. Of the ones that fled, the Gaels settled near the mouth of the Savannah River in modern day Georgia, while the Scandinavians settled farther north, in North Carolina and Virginia.

Five hundred years later, when the first colonists arrived on the coast of southern South Carolina and Georgia, they encountered tribes of light skinned natives who spoke a Gaelic language and lived a native lifestyle. One of these tribes, the Duhare, used deer as a herd animal for milk, cheese and meat. Back in Ireland, the Red Deer had been used for all dairy products before the British introduced the dairy cow.

------‐---

... "slavery" was none other than alchemists creating magical servitors to do household labor... homunculi ingredients [were] usually dirt or charred flesh or manure..."

You mention witchcraft. It's of interest that the Cherokee had a sorcery based religion. The Cherokee started around the Great Lakes area and worked their way south working for the British as slave procurers. They ended up being gifted much of the lands that had once belonged to other tribes. Could this sorcery based, occult religion have come about from their close interactions with the Elite of Europe?

This belief in sorcery was in contrast to most of the tribal beliefs in the Southeastern area. They had pretty much all migrated from Mexico, Central America and South America. Many had monotheistic systems that were easily converted to Christianity by later missionaries. Some tribes were descendants of Christians already, like the Duhare with the dairy deer, but no longer following set doctrine.

---------

@OfTheBrave mentions a 23andMe test with 0% "Native American" blood. What kind did show up? If you family was from the Southeastern states you could have any of these markers:

Peruvian
Mexican
Central American
Yucatan Peninsula
Portuguese
Spanish
Sephardic Jew
Norwegian
Swedish
Finnish
Sami (indigenous people of northern Scandinavia and Lapland)
Kirilian (Finland into Russia)
Irish
Scottish
Gallic/French
Basque
Turkish (freed Anatolian slaves, became Melungion tribe)

---------

The Lost Tribe Highway mentioned in the post was known to natives as the Great White Way. It was the highway of the East coast, running all the way down into Mexico.

---------

In regards to a comment about Rebel Yells...the Creek battle cry was very well known from the Creek Rangers/Georgia Mounted Rifles mounted militia that patrolled the Creek Confederacy and kept the peace. They were also decisive in beating the coalition of the British and Cherokee in the Revolutionary War. When the Creeks were relocated to Indian Territory, the Creek Mounted Rifles company was the police force of the West.
 
ALL South American and Caribbean native tribes were enslaved by the Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, French, British, and local slave-trading native tribes starting in 1492 and ending in the early 1800's. The natives that didn't die from overwork ended up dying of disease. A few were lucky enough to run away into the jungle, the mountains, north along the coast, or by boat to the Florida panhandle. The Africans were only brought over en masse when the natives were all already enslaved, dead or gone, to be the labor to work on plantations, etc.
Well, there is one major problem with the initial premise for the whole indian/Black slave trade, it's too convenient to explain all 3 American continents, and yet a problem remains.

If we go with the mainstream numbers for Native populations, huuuuge burials should be expected right, following the development of major settlements/cities, but where are they???

The natives outnumbered the european settlers by a large majority, so unless some kind of mind manipulation technology is being supressed, How tf the natives got so brainwashed into infighting in order not to see who the real/true enemy was.....

I could go on but you get the idea
 
There are several ways to explain no mass burials:
• It takes respect for other humans to bury a body, so did any get buried?
• Slaves were taken on the road with the Spanish to clear the way, they would have been discarded as they fell
• Perhaps bodies were burned if the person died of disease
• The people who were worked to death on platations would have different death dates from each other
• Several tribes were known to consume human flesh in certain situations, not sure what they did with the bones
• Amazonian dark earth / terra preta is a type of biochar, meaning organic materials are ignited then buried for fertility, this could have included bodies

As for WHY the natives would be so gullible? The narrative is that their arrival matched prophecies about the return of the Feathered Serpent. The real stories involve kidnapping, extortion, murder and genocide.

-------

I wasn't trying to derail the thread. Just trying to give a different perspective of what was going on in the South.
 
How does this all relate to Orthodox Jews and leprechauns being the same thing? What exactly happened between the Middle Ages and now that convinced everyone magic wasn't real? Did the Inquisition kill EVERYONE, not just heretics, and rewrite history from scratch?

What if the Inquisition made up the American Revolution narrative while rewriting history? For all we know, the 1776 version of America is fictional and George Washington is a cartoon character. But what REALLY happened in that timeframe that they had to cover up?

Someone said the answer is found in Dragon Legacy by Nicholas De Vere
 
Last edited:
The Africans were only brought over en masse when the natives were all already enslaved, dead or gone, to be the labor to work on plantations, etc.

Colored people didn't come from Africa. They were the "native" Americans. The whole narrative that they imported dark skinned people from Africa is baloney. They exported people from their native lands in the Americas and displaced them to different places in the Americas so they would have no knowledge of where they came from.


View: https://youtu.be/0wY-ilVeTjw
 
Out of Africa is a deliberate lie, but Egypt was largely Irish and Greek. Were the pharaohs British but the enslaved Jews Greek/Irish? Maybe the real migration was enslaved Egyptian-Greek Jews fleeing to the USA to found it based upon the Articles of Confederation and the Trans-Atlantic slave trade is atrocity propaganda by the British East India Company written after King George reconquered the nation and invented George Washington
 
Last edited:
Colored people didn't come from Africa. They were the "native" Americans. The whole narrative that they imported dark skinned people from Africa is baloney. They exported people from their native lands in the Americas and displaced them to different places in the Americas so they would have no knowledge of where they came from.


View: https://youtu.be/0wY-ilVeTjw


Yes. I agree with what you say for a large number of enslaved people. The native residents of the Americas were many colors and originated in many lands.

I also feel pretty sure from my readings that there were people brought over from the African continent that were enslaved. The DNA findings that have been coming out support the idea of Black Hebrews. They are descendants of slaves who had been African Jews. The Lost Tribes went to central and west Africa, as it was lush and green, not the Sahara Desert yet. These Hebrews founded great tribes in Africa. In some places Hebrew-type rites and circumcision are still practiced, and oral histories speak of their ancestors coming from the Middle East. The slavers may have specifically requested captives from these tribes of Jewish descent in order to enslave Jews.

Or this could be fake news and I'm wrong. It's so hard to know anything is truth anymore.

Several years ago I dug into DNA pretty deep. Now my sources are missing or infected with cyber viruses. I will try to find clean links.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top