The Daily Fake

Yes, how can one test the metric one is using... a trick at the heart of metrology. I seem to remember Rupert Sheldrake did a nice breakdown of the problems therein.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hO4p3xeTtUA
Talk about the speed of light starts at 10 mins

He mentions speed of light, and gravity - I also think the same problem occurs with the level of magnetism on the earth - this too is not constant.

Here's a link for those interested in another scientific view of the speed of light

The One-Way Speed of Light | Spaceaustralia.

Included is a nice eye-opening video. Are real scientists beginning to unravel the current cosmological bullshit?

Not watched the Sheldrake videos yet but will do when given an opportunity. I may have added something he's already pointed out.
 
This is not a fake:
https://archive.ph/ymimZ

this woman (Ayoung An) makes violins

An uses rocks or dry pasta “to scratch the instrument so it looks more antique,” she said.

Not an old violin, a young an.

An important moment is when luthiers place their label inside the instrument, called a “baptism.” To make her label, An stamps her ink signature onto a small piece of paper — a browned page from a secondhand book, giving the impression of age. Then, using a traditional homemade mixture of melted bovine skin and rabbit skin as a long-lasting adhesive, she glues the label inside one half of the instrument. She also burns her signature into the instrument with a tiny heated brand.

See how easy it is? People just doing their jobs. Who would know? Who ever knew?

Creating yesterday, today!
 
Last edited:
Is this fake? What bits are fake? The sugar, the wars?

https://www.science.org/content/art...d-went-did-grave-robbers-plunder-battlefields


In a new book, an international team of historians and archaeologists argues the bones were depleted by industrial-scale grave robbing. The introduction of phosphates for fertilizer and bone char as an ingredient in beet sugar processing at the beginning of the 19th century transformed bones into a hot commodity. Skyrocketing prices prompted raids on mass graves across Europe—and beyond.
Bernard Wilkin: There have been researchers excavating at Waterloo since 2012, and they have found just two bodies. But at least 10,000 men were killed there. That leaves 9998 still missing. That got us wondering—what if the fate of these men was different than we thought?
B.W.: Together with German historian Rob Schäfer, I started looking in the Belgian, German, and British archives. We found that in the 1830s, the Waterloo area became a sugar beet production hot spot. There were two sugar factories within a few kilometers of the battlefield. The filtration process required burned bone—lots of it. Historical evidence suggests it came from the battlefield itself.
B.W.: This goes way beyond battlefields. At some point a local official in Paris suggested the catacombs under the city be emptied and sent to sugar factories. We know there were medieval cemeteries in Scotland and England that were emptied out and sold; measures to ban the practice were proposed, debated—and defeated—in the British Parliament.
B.W.: There’s good evidence it was still happening after World War I, on parts of the former Western Front. There are multiple instances of French lawmakers passing local laws to protect battlefields in the 1920s.
B.W.: I wouldn’t say these were grave-robbing monsters. For the most part, they were poor farmers who seized an opportunity. In Belgium, there was maybe a sense at the time that these were foreign armies who came, destroyed everything, and left their dead. Locals didn’t have an emotional connection. They saw digging up bones as a pragmatic solution to their problems.

PS I think this is what they were doing:
Bone char - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
So, today marketing another anniversary of Brazil discovery, and among the usual religious people celebrating the Holy Cross land, i've read probably the craziest alt theory out there (yet)

There's a group of believers (catholic, for the most part) that are claiming the discovery was some 3 centuries prior by the templars who somehow had acess to vast amounts of knowledge left behind by the "phoenician navy", and called it a land of prophecy (????) and that Cabral (if he indeed existed) only solidified the prophecy.

This is one of the major problems with alt. history here, there will always be religion, prophecy, and different europeans as pioneers......... what a mess/joke
 
Latest (very) news from Apollo
So, today marketing another anniversary of Brazil discovery, and among the usual religious people celebrating the Holy Cross land, i've read probably the craziest alt theory out there (yet)

There's a group of believers (catholic, for the most part) that are claiming the discovery was some 3 centuries prior by the templars who somehow had acess to vast amounts of knowledge left behind by the "phoenician navy", and called it a land of prophecy (????) and that Cabral (if he indeed existed) only solidified the prophecy.

This is one of the major problems with alt. history here, there will always be religion, prophecy, and different europeans as pioneers......... what a mess/joke
Would you have any links . I'm a fan of crazy theories.

Unable to find any useful links to Cabral. A I at work in my local library I presume.
 



Looking at the idiotic and useless fake formula E=mc2, which only exists to bludgeon the peasants into intellectual submission to Time's "Man of the Century" (=deceiver of the century), Albert Einstein, I now see simple numerology. Both E and M can stand in for 3's if rotated. C is also 3 (3rd letter of the alphabet). If we discard the equal sign as distraction, we get 333^2, which is 999999, which is 666666, or perhaps 333×2, which is 666.

The deception is that massive and that stupid.
And when you learn how to see, it is everywhere the spell. It is annoyed but at least you know quick that is a deception or worse and don't waste time.
 
Yesterday's news from the Boy Buggering Corporation.

What do we know about UK's largest Bronze Age find at Must Farm?

Ancient settlement supposedly destroyed by fire (maybe from Vesuvius?). Amazes me the amount of shit that survives destruction.

We have dinoshit , viking shit - on display at the Viking centre York , and now Bronze age shit.

Scientifically speaking the half life of a turd or coprolite must be many millions of years.

We should erect buildings out of this stuff.

What a pile?
 
Yesterday's news from the Boy Buggering Corporation.

What do we know about UK's largest Bronze Age find at Must Farm?

Ancient settlement supposedly destroyed by fire (maybe from Vesuvius?). Amazes me the amount of shit that survives destruction.

We have dinoshit , viking shit - on display at the Viking centre York , and now Bronze age shit.

Scientifically speaking the half life of a turd or coprolite must be many millions of years.

We should erect buildings out of this stuff.

What a pile?

The 3,000-year-old settlement at Must Farm quarry in Whittlesey, Cambridgeshire, burnt down less than a year after it was built, and a wealth of well-preserved artefacts were discovered.
3000 years old, burnt down less than a year after it was built..
Such detail... maybe it was a 3 year old settlement...? But they know it was less than a year.

The University of Cambridge's Dr Marissa Ledger said it also appeared they shared food with their dogs, because both were infected by similar parasitic worms from eating the raw fish, amphibians and molluscs.
Humans and dogs ate together, out of the same bowl maybes..
 
This article:
Plato’s final hours recounted in scroll found in Vesuvius ash

is a follow on to this earlier post:
The Daily Fake

There are several interesting titbits that come out in the article:
In a groundbreaking discovery, the ancient scroll was found to contain a previously unknown narrative detailing how the Greek philosopher spent his last evening, describing how he listened to music played on a flute by a Thracian slave girl.

Despite battling a fever and being on the brink of death, Plato – who was known as a disciple of Socrates and a mentor to Aristotle, and who died in Athens around 348BC – retained enough lucidity to critique the musician for her lack of rhythm, the account suggests.
Plato on his death bed critiques a Thracian slave girl's flute playing. Ok.

“Until now it was believed that Plato was sold into slavery in 387BC during his sojourn in Sicily at the court of Dionysius I of Syracuse,” Ranocchia said. For the first time, we have been able to read sequences of hidden letters from the papyri that were enfolded within multiple layers, stuck to each other over the centuries, through an unrolling process using a mechanical technique that disrupted whole fragments of text.

Ranocchia said the ability to identify these layers and virtually realign them to their original positions to restore textual continuity represented a significant advance in terms of gathering vast amounts of information.
I'm surprised to read that Ranocchia describes the reading as a "mechanical technique", when there is nothing mechanical about it. Mechanical conjures up the idea of some sort of physical recovery, but this historical research is based on MRI scans and software - there is no physical element to it, no means of physically verifying whatever is stated.

Frankly, the pyroclastic Herculaneum scrolls need a thread of their own. They are such a good example of unverifiable history creation. They are going be able to redirect our understanding of ancient history for years to come, a bit like the papyrus Oxyrhynchus:

Oxyrhynchus Papyri - Wikipedia

which provide retrospective support for historical sources, such as the Bible. I wrote about that here:

The Daily Fake
 
This article:
Plato’s final hours recounted in scroll found in Vesuvius ash

is a follow on to this earlier post:
The Daily Fake

There are several interesting titbits that come out in the article:

Plato on his death bed critiques a Thracian slave girl's flute playing. Ok.


I'm surprised to read that Ranocchia describes the reading as a "mechanical technique", when there is nothing mechanical about it. Mechanical conjures up the idea of some sort of physical recovery, but this historical research is based on MRI scans and software - there is no physical element to it, no means of physically verifying whatever is stated.

Frankly, the pyroclastic Herculaneum scrolls need a thread of their own. They are such a good example of unverifiable history creation. They are going be able to redirect our understanding of ancient history for years to come, a bit like the papyrus Oxyrhynchus:

Oxyrhynchus Papyri - Wikipedia

which provide retrospective support for historical sources, such as the Bible. I wrote about that here:

The Daily Fake
Sorry if it’s just me but doesn’t Plato’s critique of a slave girl’s flute technique sound like something altogether more lewd?
 
Seems to me that the main sources of "ancient" history have been switched from the monasteries , globe earth attributed to ancient Greece etc thus old religions no longer required . Enter the new religion of science . The high priests Archaeology are producing a new bible . It's quite amusing really.

The dumbing down of society continues , not a nice phrase really .Would be more correct to say the dumbing down of our self proclaimed intelligentsia since most of society don't give a fuck about such things.

BBC new series about new excavations at Pompeii might be worth a watch. I like a good comedy.
 
MIT Uncovers Photomolecular Effect: Light Can Vaporize Water Without Heat

MIT researchers have uncovered that light can induce evaporation, not just heat, demonstrating this across various natural and synthetic water surfaces. This discovery could impact climate modeling and lead to innovations in solar energy and water purification technologies.

It’s the most fundamental of processes — the evaporation of water from the surfaces of oceans and lakes, the burning off of fog in the morning sun, and the drying of briny ponds that leaves solid salt behind. Evaporation is all around us, and humans have been observing it and making use of it for as long as we have existed.


And yet, it turns out, we’ve been missing a major part of the picture all along.

I linked to an article some time back announcing that scientists had recently discovered a new form of magnetism, "altermagnetism", that completely redefined the laws of magnetism and which had also been "right under our noses all along". I pointed out that logically, this implied that all calculations, etc. up to then were at best incomplete and at worst, wrong. Another logical implication is that there are almost certainly other as-yet undiscovered phenomena and that we ought to proceed with extreme caution and humility in the face of the unkown ways of God.

Now the same autustic science scum at spook central MIT are telling us that oops, actually light can evaporate water, not just heat. Of course they immediately connect it with "climate change" and the "greenhouse effect", which by the way has only ever been "proven" by using the example of Venus (that's Lucifer), a tiny speck of light in the sky whose temperature and chemical composition we are assured has been determined with absolute precision by looking at it from millions of miles away. For all I know Venus is about thirty miles up.

They crow about how this is going to revolutionize climate change modeling. But isn't the proper logical conclusion rather that every climate change model up to now must be thrown straight in the garbage, considering that none of them took into account this fundamental variable?

Imagine being so autistic and arrogant as to believe that you are able to isolate and model every single variable that goes into something as complex as the Earth's climate.

These science nerds don't scare anyone because they generally present themselves as meek, non-threatening, even cuddly, like the "Big Bang Theory" dorks. But what I see here is extreme, overweening, blinding pride, traditionally considered the gravest of the seven sins. I guess that it is this concealed pride that makes these geeks so easily manipulable by the occultists who use them to run interference. Physics today is surrounded by an impenetrable wall of mathemagic gibberish thanks to these people.

Lacan saw through the façade. He called them "overgrown children playing dress-up in white lab coats". Notice the complete absence of shame as well. There are no possible circumstances in which a scientist might ever feel compelled to apologize for unintentionally deceiving everyone. It is a field from which the concept of personal responsibility has been evacuated. All errors are innocent by definition, no matter how catastrophic the consequences of them turn out to be.

They probably don't even need to be MK-ULTRA'd first.
 
Last edited:
They crow about how this is going to revolutionize climate change modeling. But isn't the proper logical conclusion rather that every climate change model up to now must be thrown straight in the garbage, considering that none of them took into account this fundamental variable?
The de facto standard for the past 30 years is to hammer under the climate change umbrella as many fields of study as possible because it's, imo, the main pillar for societal control (some countries have a carbon tax in place ffs)
Physics today is surrounded by an impenetrable wall of mathemagic gibberish thanks to these people.
That article about a new type of magnetism can alter the foundations of physics, and it could offer possible new ways to understand regions with magnetic anomalies, and as a much needed bonus turn physics into real science again! Thanks for sharing that one
They probably don't even need to be MK-ULTRA'd first.
It feels like mk ultra has, more or less, been applied sucessfully in every facet of our reality. Or i'm being a total downer latelly for thinking this way
 
Lost Mantegna rediscovered in storage, restored – The History Blog

1715543221384.png
Before restoration

1715543239462.png
After restoration

The small work, part of the original collection amassed by Teodoro Correr, was rediscovered last December by the museum’s curator who recognized the exceptional pictorial and compositional quality of the underlying work despite its dire condition. It had been neglected in storage for years. The colors were severely faded, there was paint loss on one hand and bad overpainting on the other. The painting needed extensive restoration before it could even be accurately evaluated, never mind attributed.

Quite a lot of restoration went on here if you look.. eg a totally different background! but this is fine. It's now a restored and attributed piece from the Renaissance master Andrea Mantegna!
 
Last edited:
Lost Mantegna rediscovered in storage, restored – The History Blog

Before restoration

After restoration



Quite a lot of restoration went on here if you look.. eg a totally different background! but this is fine. It's now a restored and attributed piece from the Renaissance master Andrea Mantegna!
To call this joke a restoration is an insult to anyone with more than 2 brain cells! The background tree became a mountain, amd wth is this overpaint excuse?? The source for the overpaint is trust me bro
 
Lost Mantegna rediscovered in storage, restored – The History Blog

Before restoration

After restoration



Quite a lot of restoration went on here if you look.. eg a totally different background! but this is fine. It's now a restored and attributed piece from the Renaissance master Andrea Mantegna!
If you read the whole linked article it explains the process used far more. These restorers are usually highly skilled, meticulous in their methodology & conscientious in my experience.
I say, no fake here.
 
If you read the whole linked article it explains the process used far more. These restorers are usually highly skilled, meticulous in their methodology & conscientious in my experience.
I say, no fake here.
This is a question of opinion, of course, but there is lots to make one doubt the authenticity.

Firstly, I say, restorers can be highly skilled, meticulous, conscientious, etc... like historians... and yet they can still act in a way that results in fakery being treated/presented as real.

Then there is the issue of providence of the artwork. Apparently it was painted in 1490-1495, then mentioned in a will in 1830, then found last year. It was absent a lot. I'd personally like to see the will it was mentioned in, cos without that there's no reason to think there is any historicity to the painting at all.

It is also plain from the imagery that this 'restoration' was effectively like creating a new painting. Of which there is a twin somewhere else. As can be seen, it's really nothing like the original image. But it is now attributed to a renaissance master.

Additionally, there is something of a marketing campaign for this new attraction, as can be seen from the associated links.

In my view, it seems far more likely that Correr museum and its curators, found an opportunity to create a story around something, in a way that is harmful to no one, but beneficial to the museum, the restorers, etc. It's an interesting story to get the crowds in. What's the harm in it?
 
Last edited:
This is a question of opinion, of course, but there is lots to make one doubt the authenticity.

Firstly, I say, restorers can be highly skilled, meticulous, conscientious, etc... like historians... and yet they can still act in a way that results in fakery being treated/presented as real.

Then there is the issue of providence of the artwork. Apparently it was painted in 1490-1495, then mentioned in a will in 1830, then found last year. It was absent a lot. I'd personally like to see the will it was mentioned in, cos without that there's no reason to think there is any historicity to the painting at all.

It is also plain from the imagery that this 'restoration' was effectively like creating a new painting. Of which there is a twin somewhere else. As can be seen, it's really nothing like the original image. But it is now attributed to a renaissance master.

Additionally, there is something of a marketing campaign for this new attraction, as can be seen from the associated links.

In my view, it seems far more likely that Correr museum and its curators, found an opportunity to create a story around something, in a way that is harmful to no one, but beneficial to the museum, the restorers, etc. It's an interesting story to get the crowds in. What's the harm in it?
This forum is invariably heartless and antagonistic. You had to mockingly use the phrase 'I say' .
The restoration is the same as the twin.The painting found had been overpainted so any restoration to the original would look like the twin, which it does.
I was foolish to try to re-engage with this soulless platform.
 
This forum is invariably heartless and antagonistic. You had to mockingly use the phrase 'I say' .
The restoration is the same as the twin.The painting found had been overpainted so any restoration to the original would look like the twin, which it does.
I was foolish to try to re-engage with this soulless platform.
I'm sorry you thought I was mocking you - I was not. I really do say that people can think that they are doing 'honest work', and yet operate within a provided framework that does NOT result in getting closer to truth and does harm others.

I also have no objection to you stating your opinion - I "thumbs up'd" your post as I like alternative points of view.

I thought I was fair in explaining why I thought what I did, I took a bit of time to lay my position out, I made some points. I don't think it was soulless. However if that sort of mild, reasonable pushback is too much, I have to wonder what sort of response would have been acceptable!
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry you thought I was mocking you - I was not. I really do say that people can think that they are doing 'honest work', and yet be operating within a provided framework that does NOT result in getting closer to truth and does harm others.

I also have no objection to you stating your opinion - I "thumbs up'd" your post as I like alternative points of view.

I thought I was fair in explaining why I thought what I did, I took a bit of time to lay my position out, I made some points. I don't think it was soulless. However if that sort of mild, reasonable pushback is too much, I have to wonder what sort of response would have been acceptable!
I'm glad to hear you did not intend to mock, thanks.
Our exchange aside, I absolutely do think the forum is essentially heartless, occasionally toxic & poorly moderated & will be deleting my account.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top