The DeepMeditationTherapy Molecule (ProducedEndogenouslyRealityFrequencyEntheogenCommunicationTuner)

[Observer]

It's interesting and disappointing how folks can make a false assumption about the intentions and ideas of someone, and then from that point they can no longer see how close we are in our intentions and ideas. Meaning, imagine two people are saying 99% the same thing, but suddenly, one person chooses to see the other person as "wrong", and then from that point on can no longer neutrally correctly judge the overall theme which the person is conveying, since one keeps pointing out the 1% differences. The 1% differences in our ideas should be only 1% of our conversation. If we agree on 99% of our ideas (like media fakery, the unfairness of governments taxing us, the importance of 'every individual human can do whatever they want in life, as long as that action doesn't harm another individual human' - which is basically anarchy with that golden rule limit, and unfortunately anarchy has been painted with the wrongful black paint of wild chaos, so I don't want to use that word, but basically: reread the sentence 'every individual human can do whatever they want in life, as long as that action doesn't harm another individual human') then we should have conversations in which we focus on the 99% of things which we agree about. Why am I painted as the enemy, when I am actually a rare human trying to encourage my fellow humans to realize the same things which you are trying to encourage humans to realize. Shouldn't you be spending your time trying to correct the ideas of folks who don't realize media fakery, folks who don't realize the unfairness of having the fruits of your labor stolen by others, folks who don't realize that your movements and your actions should never be stopped as long as you are not harming another person, etc.

Recently Feralimal has been hypocritically implying that we are not enslaved and that there are no masters, which is strange since he himself strongly admitted back in the Rome Enclosure thread repeatedly that we are indeed all slaves with masters since we allow people to take "40%" of the fruit of our daily efforts (which is a very conservative estimate, I think he was only thinking there of the taxes the government masters force us to pay, while forgetting that even before that forced tribute there is the fact that presidents of companies force a 90% tribute, meaning: most workers only receive 10% of the fruit which they produce for their president masters, and only after that initial robbery comes the compounded other robberies: e.g. the tribute to the banking system since touching fiat money in the first place adds another layer of loss of fruit, then the tax robbery which yes adds up to the 40% which Feralimal pointed towards, then with the limited amount of purchasing power remaining after the robbery by your company master and the banking masters and the government masters, then comes the robbery by the land holding masters, and the fruit-tree holding masters, and the animal holding masters (for those who crazily eat flesh, as I don't) (but also for those of us who drink yogurt, as I do), and the electricity holding masters (who grab it from the air for free using the difference between the charge of water and the charge of high things like electric lines and skyscrapers), and all the other masters getting inbetween us and the free abundance which our Concave Earth womb bubble provides, so that in the end we are truly receiving far less than 1% of the fruits of our labor. Plus, going back to the first mistake, the working for a president mistake, none of us would allow a president to steal 90% or even any percent at all of the fruits of our labor if it weren't for the very first problem of us being born into a world where we don't own equal parcels of land or at the very least where we don't have the ability to roam freely and find the fruit trees we need to survive and thrive.

So, it sure is sad that Feralimal has repeatedly called me a tyrant trying to force the world into collectivism communism. Hey, Feralimal: stop that now please.

In 2015, I wrote the following, which basically says: if folks want to continue with capitalism that is fine, as long as we Reset the amount of starting-line capital everyone has.

Meaning: if we distribute everything fairly (as fairly as possible of course, it cannot be perfect, but regardless of the details one has to admit: stripping the land and money from the world's richest 100 and distributing it to each individual human as fairly as possible in as equal amounts as possible, so that from that moment there would be a rare same-starting-point situation, no matter how imperfect the distribution would be, no matter what problems occur when people start trying to sell their received land to go live elsewhere, no matter what, it still would be infinitely better than the current situation in which 99% of people are born into NOT owning any land and born into not owning any resources and born into not owning any purchasing power tokens at all.

Then, in my 2015 idea, after the Big Reset to a fairer-than-now startling-line, then we would see for the next 200 years who is fine with just eating the fruit from the land which they received or from the land which they bought from the millions they received, and who instead wants to waste their time amassing billions and trillions (but those folks would be decreased by the fact that it's hard to amass such amounts without the initial inequality which causes all the usury and working-for-others problems in the first place) (and if this revolutionary Reset of capital were to occur as I fantasize, then suddenly with everyone having land and millions each in purchasing power, the super selfish folks would be scared that it would be a waste of their time and energy to start ruthlessly amassing outlandishly inequal wealth again, since in 10 years or 50 years or 200 years or whatever, whoever the top 100 people are will always have their family's illgotten wealth stripped away and redistributed to all the individuals who comprise humanity again).

So, with this "whoever collects the most will have it taken away from them" style of capitalism, folks will start realizing one shouldn't bother trying to hold trillions of times more than the poorest. Perhaps holding 10 or 100 times more than others is truly the logical limit which folks will begin individually choosing to limit their own desires and reality to.

Anyway, here are the posts which I made in 2015, and please folks, can you try concentrating on assuming good faith and let's talk about the 99% which you agree on before you paint me as a tyrant about the 1% which we disagree about:


Written and published publicly by me, on February 26th, 2015, 1:53 am
View topic - THE "CHATBOX" • Cluesforum.info

Yeah - I guess somebody has to prove to humanity, with a video experience perhaps, that humanity currently does indeed have the mental disease of foolishly assuming the computer graphic animated forged images shown on television news channels are evidence of actual events.

To prove this fact one could create a computer graphic animation experience which actually fools the viewer for awhile, and then suddenly reveals the fact that the viewer was fooled, perhaps this experience will help prove to humanity the existence of this mental disease. "You were fooled by CGI just now, here is the evidence. And we all were fooled by CGI in 2001, here is the evidence. And we have discovered CGI forgeries televised by mainstream media many times from 2001 through 2015, here is the evidence."

I think what you two are wisely pointing at indirectly, is the fact that even AFTER that powerful video experience is created (which I hope you two unite with Simon to create over the next year), that even AFTER it has been proven to humanity that this mental disease exists (the mental disease of assuming that news channels don't televise computer graphic images) that even that itself might be a symptom of an even DEEPER mental disease.

Perhaps the deeper underlying mental disease is that humanity naively assumes that the world's richest 100 humans somehow LACK the inherent motive and ability to pay for trusted sources to vouch for forged images.

Perhaps the even deeper underlying mental disease is that humanity assumes that we should not DO SOMETHING about the fact that all 7 billion humans living on earth today could, all at the exact same time, enjoy a much better life (a quantifiable million times better life, do the calculation) if we were to reset the capitalism competition starting point, right here, right now: by suddenly justly dividing evenly into 7 billion parts ALL of the earth's resources fairly to each living human.

Songs need to be sung which describe the million-times-better-life that 6,999,999,900 humans can enjoy right now, immediately, as soon as we are ready to grab it, by simply redistributing the wealth currently unlawfully held by the world's richest 100 humans.

After The Big Reset (which is coming, it is just a matter of WHEN) then with each of the humans standing at the same fair starting point (meaning each human allocated randomly equal trade-able amounts of arable land and gold), then from that moment the competition will begin freshly.

It will be interesting for all of humanity to see, after The Big Reset, that the 100 humans who previously were unlawfully hoarding 99.99% of humanity's resources, will have a difficult time zooming past the rest of humanity in the subsequent Post-Reset capitalism competition.

Stripped of all the hoarded capital which they inherited from their ancestors who didn't earn it lawfully, no longer able to simply profit from inherited inequality, no longer able to lazily earn capital by merely having inherited more capital, these 100 will be forced by The Big Reset to rejoin humanity in an actual competition of the minds: in which humanity rewards those who actually produce the best contributions to the overall happiness of humanity.

Possible summary: Media-fakery is a symptom of some humans having the resources which give the ability to bribe/fool/create the various channels of trusted-sources, and that ability itself is a symptom the world's richest 100 humans owning 99.99% of the earth's resources.

Reducing the fakery-ability requires reducing the bribery-ability, which requires reducing the current-inequality-level. The current-inequality-level has reached an absolutely crazy proportion: 6,999,999,990 regular-humans owning a tiny fraction of the amount the 100 richest unlawfully-hoarding-humans currently control in early 2015.

The Big Reset is coming, it has been imagined, it is being shared, it will happen. Whether it happens quickly or slowly, or right away suddenly all at once, the speed of change is up to us, the regular majority, to take righteous lawful action.

To increase humanity's chances of survival and to increase individual happiness, we are immediately getting our minds clear of the old mistake/disease: the mental disease of believing the richest 100 humans' fakery-images which are broadcast worldwide by the "trusted sources".

Or maybe what is being pointed at by BrianV and HoiPolloi is that the disease goes even deeper, beyond all of the external problem of the forged images being televised, into the fact that we humans make the internal mistake of trusting any story-telling-sources in the first place.

Possible Solution: from now on, we should only trust what one can see in the 100 meter bubble around ones own self, because digital images can no longer be trusted.

Only what we see in our daily 100 meter bubble is proven. Every other story that comes in, about a supposed event reported to be occurring elsewhere OUTSIDE your 100 meter bubble of reality, is just that: a mere story which is possibly and probably fiction.

And, just to end on a positive note - even though we all have inherited just a tiny fraction of what is rightfully ours - I would like to report some good news (although, since digital-words are just as evidence-less as digital-images, make sure you don't believe these words, but instead go outside and check your own reality bubble for yourself to see if they ring true) that the small sample of humans that I physically interact with each day are on average quite nice, and are rarely hurting other humans, and are instead usually helping other humans, just like me, to have a pleasant experience, to have a good time, to have a nice day.

In the world of hollywood/media/internet stories, the majority of the stories claim that the majority of humans selfishly derive happiness from the sadness of others, but in the reality bubble I see everyday: the majority of humans altruistically gain happiness from seeing the happiness of others.






+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

[Jd755]

If we agree on 99% of our ideas

That is a belief which is impossible to quantify or establish as truth.
To believe any member here believes as you do on any topic is unreasonable and is not a prerequisite for a conversation.

Shouldn't you be spending your time trying to correct the ideas of folks.

If that is what one decides for themselves is the best use for them of their finite time.

 

[feralimal]

Recently Feralimal has been hypocritically implying that we are not enslaved and that there are no masters, which is strange since he himself strongly admitted back in the Rome Enclosure thread repeatedly that we are indeed all slaves with masters since we allow people to take "40%" of the fruit of our daily efforts (which is a very conservative estimate, I think he was only thinking there of the taxes the government masters force us to pay, while forgetting that even before that forced tribute there is the fact that presidents of companies force a 90% tribute, meaning: most workers only receive 10% of the fruit which they produce for their president masters, and only after that initial robbery comes the compounded other robberies: e.g. the tribute to the banking system since touching fiat money in the first place adds another layer of loss of fruit, then the tax robbery which yes adds up to the 40% which Feralimal pointed towards, then with the limited amount of purchasing power remaining after the robbery by your company master and the banking masters and the government masters, then comes the robbery by the land holding masters, and the fruit-tree holding masters, and the animal holding masters (for those who crazily eat flesh, as I don't) (but also for those of us who drink yogurt, as I do), and the electricity holding masters (who grab it from the air for free using the difference between the charge of water and the charge of high things like electric lines and skyscrapers), and all the other masters getting inbetween us and the free abundance which our Concave Earth womb bubble provides, so that in the end we are truly receiving far less than 1% of the fruits of our labor. Plus, going back to the first mistake, the working for a president mistake, none of us would allow a president to steal 90% or even any percent at all of the fruits of our labor if it weren't for the very first problem of us being born into a world where we don't own equal parcels of land or at the very least where we don't have the ability to roam freely and find the fruit trees we need to survive and thrive.

Hi

I was trying to get a slightly more nuanced position than what you express. I'm coming at it from the perspective of an individual. Also, my views about how the world work are in continuous flux - I'm happy to revisit or recomment on anything I have said in the past - I would hope that I would get the opportunity to do so. I'm taking it here anyway.

How a person assesses their world is open to many interpretations. There is the real world and there is the individual interpreting the world. Yes, there are real world pressures - people are forced to hand over income to the government, that they are strongly guided to think this or that by government education, etc. Yes, the government is managed by a political class, but I suspect that neither you nor I think that politicians are running things. We don't know who is running things. It seems perfectly possible that it is a hidden elite. It is also possible that there are people who simply offer options to the masses, and the masses choose what they want. In this latter case, its hard to say that someone is controlling everyone, when the masses do get a choice - ie "we" do it ourselves.

The follow on point is then what you identify as - are you the masses or are you an individual? You say "us" a lot - so it is my impression that you are thinking as part of a collective. I think this is a sort of projection - you are projecting your understanding onto the world and hoping to see it reflected. Why is it important that the masses/'the world'/society follows the rules you prefer? If you are an individual, shouldn't one focus on oneself, consciously uncouple from the system as much as possible, try to live one's own life as best one can, acting on what one knows? It seems to me that this perhaps unintuitive proposal is a real, permanent answer. There is no group psychosis/insanity in it - people can act according to a simple moral code (the golden rule) and everything else can follow, with no governance system/rule book. It is only when people are subject to the group insanity that you need law books, external governance, etc.

Take a look at this to see what I mean:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRhl_FDCsV8

However, if you want to play the game, yes, you will need to rouse a bigger collective than 'the elites' have (which I don't think you will), and you will then need to direct the collective your way (I don't think this is as simple as you think). While I'm sure you intend to be a better king than the current elites, anyone who is prepared to tell others what to do and think, infringing on their free will, cannot help but be a tyrant to an individual - sorry. For me, anarchy - not having rulers or being ruler of oneself - is merely the first step.

 

[Observer]

I'm going to paste below the private letter which I sent to Feralimal a month ago, in reply to his private letter to me in which he shared with me a recent summary of his current thinking about word usage, which I paraphrase his main point in his PDF as basically: "Individuals shouldn't use the word 'we', for example 'we went to the moon', since not only is that sentence wrong (since the Apollo videos were of course faked), but since it is also wrong to use the word 'we' even for things which other humans have actually done, since there is no such thing as 'we', there is no such thing as 'humanity', there are only separate individuals, separate individuals are never a group, and thinking of ourselves as one big family/species/group is committing the ultimate sin of collectivism which is the biggest killer of freedom."

This idea is not new to me, for example, I love the short story by Samuel Langhorne Clemens (Mark Twain), in which he says "Man is a Machine", and goes on to say that no man should feel proud of the accomplishments of others, since he can only be proud of what he has done, and even then, a man should not be even proud of his own accomplishments, since he simply inherited by chance a certain kind of body with certain abilities, so stop being proud of anything at all, and also by the way stop being proud of 'your' culture, which also you were simply born into, a bunch of ideas which came to your area by force, and over the generations the children of the physically raped and mentally raped victims start to be proud of their received genetics and ideas, even though it all was foreign and forced initially.

Yes, there are a lot of interesting ideas which I agree with so I'll post that here for you to realize your ideas are quite agreeable to me, Feralimal. And yes, I already agree with 100% with Feralimal's ideas about the absolute wrongness of governments throwing people into cages who have not harmed anyone, and using the treat of cages to force tribute payment, and governments themselves. I totally agree each individual has the inherent right to individual freedom to do anything, absolutely anything, as long as it does not directly harm another individual. (And that is an inherent right, not a privilege bestowed upon one by any other person or collection of persons.) I think all laws can be deleted with just one law left to be forever kept: Don't harm any other human. That's it. As long as you aren't hurting another human, you can do whatever you want.

So for you to think/say/imply that I'm trying to force anyone to do something is absurdly wrong. I'm only using words. I'm only sharing ideas. I'm trying to encourage other individuals, as many as possible, to realize that there are individuals who ARE harming each and every one of us, literally having stolen all of the abundant bounty of the Earth like the fruit trees and the land and everything else, and these ruling individuals are literally throwing individuals into cages with rapists and killers for merely not paying tribute to their mafia protection demands, using other paid accomplices to fool almost the other individuals into thinking 'this is all fair and without this government (protection racket) there would be bandits everywhere stealing your fruit and your loved ones' when in fact it is the governors and the wealthiest who sit above them who are the ruthless bandits who feel fine enslaving all the individuals for profit. Enslavers who then took some of their stolen loot and created a whole legitimate-seeming facade, with a bunch of paid writers to make our enslavement seem like something we want and something we benefit from, plus a bunch of paid mercenaries to kill and cage any individuals whom the enslavers deem to be decreasing their annual profiteering. I'm against the election of any leaders, since any leader who has the power to make any decision (such as what laws to enact, or what taxes to impose, or which wealthy company presidents get to siphon off that treasury booty due to bribes to the decision-making power-holding elected-leaders, etc.) is of course inherently corrupt and thus all representative 'democracies' are inherently flawed since they are not a true democracy when the power-holder can and does always go against the wishes of the individuals who allowed him to have that power in the first place. Pure democracy is better than that, meaning: pure democracy in which all individuals vote on ACTIONS, not leaders. For example, when individuals used the power of majority to successfully vote to stop putting cannabis-lovers into cages, since the act of imbibing cannabis does not harm anyone, and since it is crazy to force cannabis users to be placed into cages with rapists and killers who actually have harmed people. My father took three years off from his businessman life, and he personally collected 10,000 signatures for Jack Herer, with little 11-year-old me right there with him, to ReLegalize cannabis. And then he went further by expanding the ballot measure to say 'one can do whatever one wants in the privacy of one's home', meaning whatever drugs, whatever sex, whatever one wants to do should be legal, as long as it is consenting adult individuals. The Right to Privacy campaign. So on one hand, I saw it is much better to have such things be decided by direct democracy voting about ACTIONS by the individuals, to get the real desire of the majority, instead of the desire of the rulers through bribed politicians. This direct-voting-about-actions style of pure democracy (which supposedly the Greeks kind of had for awhile, according to the unprovable stories which we receive) is MUCH BETTER than electing leaders to enact laws, since: those few leaders can be easily bribed while it is much harder to bribe the majority of voters to enact laws against themselves. BUT, here's the big but which I guess you have been wanting me to elucidate, I also know that the majority can NOT be trusted completely, since they can be FOOLED into voting to enact laws against themselves, as we can plainly see when Rockefeller slapped on the word Marijuana instead of the original word Cannabis, and used paid-writers (Hearst Corporation) and bribed-legislators to together fool the majority of individuals (in America, and then everywhere else) into thinking that the use of this new "Mexican/Negro" "Marijuana" plant should be outlawed (and thus the general population was fooled, since they didn't realize at first that the plant the media and politicians were demonizing was the same old cannabis which every culture everywhere had loved since the beginning of history, haha, whenever that truly was) so the majority was fooled into thinking it made sense 'to protect both the users and society from this new demon drug' and the end result was that millions over the following decades were forced by guns into a cage with killers, all because the majority were fooled by Rockefeller's bribed accomplices, all to push out his biggest fuel+medicine+clothing rival. So yes, I don't want the majority to have the power to enact laws which place people who harm none to be caged as if they had harmed someone. For example, if tomorrow the majority (the collective, the humanity, the group which you are so scared of, a fear which makes you even want 'us' humans to stop using the word 'we') decides to make eating an orange, or any fruit containing vitamin C, a capital offense, then yes, that is the danger of the majority, the mob, who is easily fooled. But still, the main reason they are fooled is because of the inequality of the few being able to bribe 10% into helping them fool the 90% majority. So, again, to reduce this fear of the majority choosing a path which is bad for each individual, my proposed solution of cutting off the rulers' bribery ability would result in less cases of the majority being fooled. And you must admit, allowing the majority to vote directly about all laws and all actions is MUCH BETTER than allowing the proven-corrupt inherently-corrupt system of bribable-threatenable representative-leaders who of course will always do what the wealthiest rulers sitting above them want, and what the wealthiest rulers want is always to enslave the 99% of individuals even further and further. So, if given the choice between direct democracy with no leaders, or representative democracy with leaders, the LEADERLESS style is objectively better, since again: nobody should hold power over another. Which is why, in my mental utopia, my ideal: the only law would be the "Harm nobody" law. Meaning, even if we give all the individuals (8 billion or 8 million, whatever the actual number of humans living now might be) the ability to vote on things, they can't vote in any law which conflicts with that one-sentence sole law. Imagine that's the Constitution of the world without rulers: Harm nobody. Basically, what folks can vote on is what penalties to give those who have harmed another individual. Details like that. But again, why are we so worried about such details when first we need to acknowledge and fix the huge problem of 1% of the population owning 99% of the resources, which results in them being able to bribe 'experts' into fooling the majority into not realizing the extent of the slavery which we are born into. Look, as you'll see in my 2015 CluesForum posts which I'm about to share with the world below in this thread, I make it very clear that the ability to bribe comes from the inequality in birth-assets. If everyone is given equal assets, imagine 8 billion individuals on the same footing for just a moment, then at that very magical moment it is very hard (much harder than it is now) to bribe anyone. In our current enslaved situation, with 99% of individuals fighting each other to grab just the crumbs falling off the table of the world's wealthiest, it is of course very easy for the world's wealthiest to bribe mercenaries/judges/politicians/experts/announcers to go against innate human conscience by becoming accomplices to enslavement, for merely $600,000 or even $60,000 - but if tomorrow we were magically able to strip (as in Mr. Robot, the fantasy TV show idea) the world's wealthiest and distribute that money to every human in Earth, well, suddenly the desperation of the 99% is no longer there, suddenly everyone has the ability to have guaranteed food and shelter and travel and LIFE, and suddenly the previously wealthy rulers no longer have any bribery money to pay for guards. Plus, even if that "hacking the bank accounts of the wealthiest like in the Mr. Robot story" is impossible, there is the other way to scare off the guards, which is: imagine a majority of the population were to realize the extent of the slavery we all were born into, and thus the majority decides to Storm The Gates. The guards would drop their guns and join us, if the 'mob' were truly big enough. Which is why, yes, I am indeed trying to talk to humanity as a whole, or the 8 billion humans within Earth, however you want to label it, stop playing semantic word games. We need to show the rulers we no longer agree to this slavery caused by inequality and continued bribery caused by inequality. I'm not saying let's have everyone receive monthly payments forever regardless of their production to the community. I'm not even saying there needs to be any communities. I'm saying release the land so that we can eat first, we need to eat for a few decades without having our daily toil be taxed by land owners and company presidents and governors, and we need the ability to roam freely, and we need the ability to do whatever we want as long as we aren't harming anyone. Your fear of the mob then turning on the minority individuals and doing something bad to them is illogical. You yourself have said, Feralimal, you never have seen any bandits doing bad things to people (and even if you have, I would say that's because they were born into slavery like we were.) The bandits are the governors and the world's wealthiest who control them. So let's go right to the top. Imagine a superhero who kills killers. Well, wouldn't it be stupid for such a superhero to kill killers who only have killed a few folks, when there are killers who have killed millions of folks. OK, so stop worrying about the rights of millionaires or even billionaires to not-be-harmed, since they are not even the targets. Imagine a pyramid of birds shitting on each other. One at the top, shitting on 2. Those 2 shitting on 4. Those 4 shitting on 8. Leading all the way down to 8 billion birds at the bottom getting shit on. Look, I'm not saying to go after the layer just above us. I'm saying to go to the very top. The ACTUAL world's richest 100, whether they be aliens or humans or something in-between, who give the orders to the world's richest actors who appear in the Forbes list of "the world's richest 100". And then, work our way down from there, until nobody has more than 10 times the bribery money of the poorest. Ultimate Robin Hood, but now nevermind the sole Superhero/Hero idea, and simply have this done by 8 billion individuals, or at the very least, the majority of the 8 billion individuals. Look, are you saying there was never a time when we had the ability to freely roam and freely set up camp and freely eat food which the Earth freely produces daily? Or, are you saying there was such a time but we can never return to it due to the world's wealthiest having geometrically amassed 99% of the resources to pay for their minions? Don't you think there is a chance that (if you could wave a magic wand and wake up a majority of the individuals) we could use the power of numbers to overwhelm and retake what is rightfully ours, namely: the entire Earth and all of its abundant resources? Please stop with your "you are advocating fascism/communism, in which a huge government continues to enslave people even worse than capitalism, you want to be the leader, and a psychopathic tyrannical one at that" trip, or least stop laying that on me, since that's not what I'm advocating at all. I'm advocating total freedom, no governors, no rulers, no leaders, simply the idea of 8 billion (or however many there are) individual humans rebelling against the masters and saying with our actions, "No, we will no longer accept slavery from birth, we will no longer accept an unequal starting line, we will grab all the resources from the world's richest and distribute everything to every human equally, not just pretend to do so as the communists/socialist governments did, this is an actual equal distribution idea, not some 'state' holding everything, we're talking about actual instant equal distribution, with any bureaucrat types trying to pocket some of the distribution unfairly immediately caged for stealing from the rest of the 8 billion, and yes, after the fair equal distribution, we will still then compete in the normal business manner to see which individuals produce the best products/services/ideas which the other individuals will still daily 'vote' for with their purchasing/donation ability, but we will no longer agree to a competition in which the starting line involves being born into a world in which 100 folks own more than the 8 billion folks combined. We demand to be allowed to pull resources from any field in Earth, and we demand to not have anyone stealing the berries which we personally collect at the end of each day, and if anyone continues to keep physically preventing us from eating the fruit of the Earth wherever we like, then that individual is literally using violence or the threat of violence to enslave us, to make us their berry pickers while they simply sit and do nothing, and actually with modern technology we all can sit and do nothing with robots doing the berry picking for us, we simply need to grab the resources to create the robots, and thus, the main point is: we are no longer going to peacefully allow ourselves to be enslaved. Each one of us is a free individual. You can not stop any individual from doing what he or she wants, as long as it that action does not harm anyone else, and if anyone harms anyone else, then the victim or the victim's family or the victim's community can and will harm or at least imprison the perpetrator who initially harmed the victim. So instant justice is what will prevent almost all crime, in addition to the fact that 99% of the humans in Earth are not interested in harming innocent victims. 99% of humans in Earth only want to harm those who have actually harmed innocent victims. 99% of humans in Earth love Justice, just as I do. 99% of humans in Earth have NEVER harmed another human, even though we are desperately enslaved. Only 1% of humans have harmed other humans, and of that relatively tiny fraction, most of those killers/enslavers are the world's wealthiest. So again, the only ones who need to fear this revolution are the 1% who have enslaved humanity. As long as you are in the 99% poorest group, you're fine! Don't want to be targeted? Don't amass enough resources to be in the richest 1%."

I've written enough for now, I'll paste the "Man is a Machine" short story, and my letter to Feralimal about the use of the word 'we', and my revolutionary CluesForum 2015 posts, all within the next week or so. I need to go eat and sleep now.

 

[feralimal]

to fool almost the other individuals into thinking 'this is all fair and without this government protection racket there would be bandits everywhere stealing your fruit and your loved ones' when in fact it is the governors and the wealthiest who sit above them who are the ruthless bandits who feel fine enslaving all the individuals for profit

Nevertheless, these fooled individuals are not interested - they go along with what is being suggested/requested. That's their choice, right?

Here is a simple moral conundrum to illustrate the situation:

If Andrew makes the suggestion to Bert that all Bert's financial woes would be over if he killed Charlie, and then Bert does go ahead and kill Charlie - where does the moral culpability lie?

If you remain true to your argument above, you would presumably argue that actually it is Adam who is at fault, not Bert.

My analysis is however, is that Andrew is free to make and speak whatever observations he likes and that Bert bears the entire fault. Bert is free to decide and decides for himself.

You can make the conundrum more complex eg:

If Andrew tells a story about Charlie being the literal incarnation of Hitler, and that for the good of humanity Bert should kill Charlie, which Bert does - where does the moral culpability lie now?

For me, Bert is still culpable. It is he who chooses to believe and act on information that he does not know. Individuals are free to believe any old rubbish and act how they like - but but the person undertaking the actions is responsible. Accepting and acting on something you don't know for sure as if you did know is a choice.

If Andrew tells Bert a false story about Charlie being a wonderful man, and Bert then gives Charlie chocolates - who is the fool: Andrew or Bert?

Etc. I won't go on.

I contacted you privately as a document I had written had a reference to a Castaneda quote in it, a quote that you initially brought my attention to (and credited you in my mega-theories thread). In the document, I say how I had a sort of resolution to the Castaneda line: 'They gave us their mind!'. Its not really stolen history stuff, more personal analysis on the 'reality infrastructure'.

I will attach the document I sent you - if anyone can bear to read it, they can. I'm certainly interested to hear any critiques or thoughts on it - they can contact me privately via the email at the top of the document, or here, or whatever.

 

[Observer]

Once again, Feralimal, you are implying (as you have done many times now) that me as an individual saying to 8 billion individuals "Hey, there is an enslavement reality here, it sure would be nice if we could make it closer to fair" is somehow me not respecting choice or trying to force people to do something.

How am I not respecting the free will of 8 billion individuals by speaking or writing ideas? And how are my words forcing anyone to do anything? Where is the force? I'm not threatening anyone to take action, I'm not bribing anyone to take action. I'm basically saying, "Let's find the aliens still living in Earth who altered us and created this entire enslavement situation, and let's distribute to all the 8 billion individuals fairly for a fresh start with a fairly equal starting line!"

You yourself wrote these same words of basically "Hey, there is an enslavement reality here" in the Rome Enclosed thread and elsewhere, yet you simply lack the honesty/courage to go further into what each individual united together for a moment could possibly hope to achieve: "If 8 billion individuals are indeed enslaved, then theoretically in an ideal world a sufficient number of those 8 billion individual slaves should rebel by killing the ultimate enslavers and the ultimate killers (the hidden kings who all the world's governments pay tribute to and who actually choose when to have their underlings start wars for profit, the hidden kings who Usselo theorize altered our DNA and made us food before and 'merely' financial slaves now) or, if you think the world's wealthiest aliens are not guilty of enslavement to the degree of capital punishment, if you think the world's wealthiest have not started wars which caused the deaths of millions or even hundreds, then at least you should be advocating arresting convicting and imprisoning them, or if you think they are only guilty or inheriting ill-gotten gains from their ancestors who took all the land by force and/or by fraud by writing fake 'legal deed' histories giving their families 'property legality' then at least you should be advocating stealing back the world's wealth from them for immediate redistribution to the world's individuals (again, Mr. Robot style, where the money immediately is instantly taken back and in the same exact moment instantly distributed fairly to all the individuals for each to immediately use as they see fit, not to be held even for a moment by some communist collective new tyrannical government imposing its will as you keep implying that I want to create/rule, I could show you the sentences where you have made such implications, but already you know what you are thinking and what you have implied while still having the sneaky out of being able to back-pedal by claiming 'I didn't write exactly that per-se'), so on one hand you have outright admitted that there are literal physical robber bandits with guns forcing us to pay them tribute using the threat of throwing us into prison cages if you don't work extra hours every day to make these tribute payments (and you know very well those same cages contain proven killers, the actual 0.1% of the non-ruling humans who actually do kill other humans, so these cages are not safe at all, and lead to the wrongfully caged non-tribute payers having to choose between allowing themselves to be enslaved within the cages even further or defending themselves and suddenly having violence add years to their cage time) so again on one hand you admit that we are in fact born into enslavement (although it seems your only admittance of the enslavement is governments, which by default means you are for some reason refusing to admit the world's current owners who sit above governments inherited 99% of the world's owned land from their ancestors, or took it themselves if their lives are sufficiently long enough, either way, unlawfully gained capital/land/resources, and yet knowing all this you think the best thing to do is to try to imply that I'm psychopathic for saying the 99% of individuals born into such enslavement shouldn't allow this problem to be passed on our great-grandchildren. Seriously, we're talking about forced sterilization genocide being committed via threat of starvation and via fraud which fools the individuals into 'voluntarily' putting that noose around their own neck 'for the good of weak-bodied others' 'to protect' against 'viruses', this is an actual physical attack by whoever controls the low level fall-guy actors such as CFR Bilderberg WHO Fauci Gates etc, and yet it seems online they have their controlled-opposition fake-revolution writers implying and actually outright saying that it would be wrong for us to physically defend ourselves from the next round of forced/fraudulent chemical injection attempts coming soon, that all we should do is call them 'clowns' and 'laugh at them' and lament that 'there is nothing 8 billion can do to stop the richest 100' and even say as my supposedly-intelligent online 'friend' (who might be a bot, since he refuses to allow me to hear his voice and/or show his face via a video chat, who like other possible bots here only want to 'keep communication in writing' for some strange reason, and, I might add, whose writings are strangely contradicting themselves in an illogical chatGPT way, which I'll get into in a moment) saying on one hand it is immoral for me to try to rally 8 billion individuals into taking any actual concrete action beyond mere lamenting about taxes, he won't even advocate 'let's all stop paying voluntarily paying taxes at once, since the system can't arrest us all', he won't even admit the power of 8 billion individuals choosing to do the same thing at once, he says (and this is how this argument really started) that it is immoral for individuals to even unite for GOOD actions, because the mere cooperation/uniting of doing anything as a 'we' is simply 'us' installing a worse-than-now forcing of 'group will' upon other individuals (he can't even admit that there are some individuals, namely the world's owners/rulers/controllers/wealthiest who actually - through their own actions of hoarding limited resources and setting the 99% against each other to fight over less than 1% of the world's resources - have lost their right to be free from harm, since they have harmed and are continuing to harm the lives of 8 billion individuals.

On one hand he says they are robbing us and pricking us thus we have the harmful enslavement, but on the other hand he wants us to never use the power of numbers to stop it. As individuals, he knows there is absolutely zero chance of him as one lone individual being able to set himself free from the enslavement and the forced 'put this noose around your neck, or you don't get food to eat' suicidal chemical sterilization 'agreement' (again, with the threat of not eating being done via the unequal land/resource/capital hoarding which I keep talking about, and through the bribery ability of 'governmental and scientific experts and official polls' which then adds fraud to make a facade as if the people are actually agreeing to all this) and yet on the other hand he implies that 'even worse than this current situation continuing into population reduction and literal cage-pods from birth-to-death as batteries-matrix-style would be the ultimate worry of 8 billion individuals uniting to overthrow the current enslavement, because, well, if 8 billion individuals were to unite to overthrow the current rulers, that mob would harm some innocent rulers somewhere, prove to me that bad masters exist, or that even masters exist, and prove to me the world's rulers deserve to have their riches redistributed to the world, you can't prove anything, we know nothing, so all action-taking is immoral, and even if it were justified for these 8 billion individuals to take back the world by force, I'm sure that the mob would just immediately force an even worse regime upon themselves, so given the choice between a for-sure-continuance of current enslavement and forced chemical injections or the possible enslavement which a united or even semi-united 8 billion millionaires would install, I'm more worried about the possible enslavement more, and my WORRY about the possible enslavement which the mob would enact outweighs my cognition of the REALITY of our current enslavement. Stop using the word 'we', stop using the word 'us', all individuals must remain NOT united-via-the-power-of-numbers-against-the-power-of-capital-hoarders. A group of twigs banded together is so dangerous, I instead hope all individuals must forever remain solitary weak singular twigs who have no defense against the bigger-gun-holding twig-breakers."

That's the vibe I get from Feralimal's carefully couched words, as well as HoiPolloi, as well as other online personas (possibly bots, possible agents, or possibly simply folks whose "loyalty-loop" aversion to actually sufficiently strongly fighting our creators/programmers/rulers). Overly pacifist: limiting themselves and encouraging others to limit themselves to mere philosophical words forever, regardless of the fact their sisters and mothers are being raped, as well as their brothers and fathers, since every individual in Earth is from birth being forced to prostitute our bodies doing physical work for the benefit of the rulers, all due to being born into an absurdly unequal situation of 1% of the population owning 99% of the fruit trees.

It doesn't make sense to me, this refusal to advocate any action for a better world for our descendants. Maybe this is just the nihilistic vibe of a person who didn't procreate, who simply doesn't care about the future of his line, since he doesn't imagine his soul will come back and re-enter his line through future incarnations in his direct line of descendants. Maybe he simply thinks we die and that is all there is, and thus maybe it he thinks we should simply eat and sleep and lament through typing about the mistakes which the 8 billion individuals make. Maybe he has given up completely on even the fantasy of the 8 billion individuals, or at least a majority of them, or even a sufficiently large fraction of them, changing their currently-held opinions and choosing to start defending themselves and their inherent rights, as individuals. Yes, I know I'm laying a lot on this Feralimal character, who I'm treating as an avatar now for all online typists who type messages of "Take no action, do not unite, just stop feeling anything about your enslavement, you have some mental disease for even contemplating uniting to rebel", or like HoiPolloi who wrote "We can't really do anything and so it's probably not our human responsibility to actually do anything. Just keep spreading the word as you're doing and things will change themselves in time. At least, that's what I think. I personally advocate pacifism. Officially and also because peace is the way." and who, when I pressed him on how he thinks we should revolt, could only agree to say that basically "marches with individuals holding signs on paper" is the most individuals should ever do.

It seems to me this is a case of the internal-limiter "loyalty loop" which Usselo discovered / brought to our attention, which is the internal-limiter of rebellion against authority, which Frostychud reminds us Freud talked about as well by labeling this internal-limiter the "superego", and thus there are simply some people who are so limited by this built-in internal-limiter which prevents them from considering going against those above them in the power structure, the creators, the rulers, yet being somehow perfectly able to verbally punch down, to those "lazy welfare recipients / homeless vagabond / bread thieves", they just simply show enough courage to verbally punch UP towards the real top of the pyramid authorities, or even if they do have the courage to verbally punch up, they say that verbal stuff is what we should limit ourselves to doing, since such lamenting/complaining doesn't harm anyone. So, these folks who would kill a poor hungry person below them for trying to steal $100, find it inconceivable to even consider justice measures against the world's richest robbers. Even though they are are intelligent they keep coming into conversations and basically saying/implying "Don't kill the masters, even if I admit that we are indeed enslaved, killing the masters would be immoral. You have a mental disease for even thinking about rallying the individuals to kill the masters. Even taking back some wealth from the masters and distributing to all the individuals equally would be immoral, since how do you KNOW that wealth was gained immorally. You can't punish the world's richest children for the sins of their ancestors, can you? Perhaps the world's richest and their grandparents simply earned those quadrillions of times more than everyone else combined in a perfectly lawful manner without ever harming anyone and without ever committing fraud. So it's impossible to imagine redistributing that wealth, since that would simply be a group of immoral collectivists robbing the world's wealthiest without PROOF of the wealthiest having done anything wrong. And remember, I say we can't prove anything at all, really, so I'll never give my verbal approval to any action at all. I prefer to stay in the state of not knowing, since god forbid I would commit the sin of saying advocating for change. I would rather commit the sin of inaction, since at least that way my hands are clean, since I never advocated for myself or for others to take any action at all. It's a moral conundrum. Let's talk and type forever, but bottom line, let's not take action against the masters. As a matter fact, let's stop using the term 'let's' since there is no 'us'. Just enslaved individuals who should remain enslaved individuals. My 'what if the next regime is worse' fear outweighs the admitted 'this current regime is absurdly draconian' reality."

Look, just theoretically, I think there are existing somewhere actual rulers who sit above the low level actors playing the role of the world's richest, the folks whose names we know are paid fall-guys so that if real revolution were to actually occur, humanity would be killing/imprisoning/stealing from just some mere billionaires, leaving the real rulers (the trillionaires, the quadrillionaires, the folks who probably don't even need to touch money since they get slaves to work for a place to sleep and food, and even better, who probably simply have armies of robot slaves in their underground bases growing and feeding them grapes) and thus they escape justice by setting up these public "wealthiest" actors: that's the whole point of politicians and Arnault/Musk/Bezos/Ellison/Buffett/Gates types - to fool us into thinking they are the world's richest, when in fact the are mere low-level decoys. Anyway, the point is, do you really think these public names are actually the world's rulers? Very sneaky of the aliens, who thus use our human innate reluctance to kill other humans to thus prevent us from taking action, since "That's just some fellow human in a sweater who earned his money fairly by selling us things we chose to buy." See, the first problem is most humans feel bad for even contemplating stealing back our own money from the world's officially "richest", and the second problem is we don't have proof that there are different-gened extraterrestrials who are much richer and much more powerful controlling those patsies, and the third problem is we don't know where those controllers are living, and the fourth problem is we don't have the resources to physically find and break into the underground bases, we can't even go to the center of the south pole. I have been fantasizing for decades now about millions or billions of us coming together to Storm The Gates of the South Pole (whether that leads to a tunnel to the underground, as in the Concave Earth idea, or whether that leads to the pizza crust in the flat earth idea, which would mean leading to a possibly infinite amount of new-to-us LAND for us to explore either way. Infinite Flat Plane, with free land extending in all directions, or inifinite swiss cheese bubbles of land connected by underground tunnels as in the concave earth idea, no matter what, the only way to KNOW for sure what is at the South Pole is to GO to the South Pole and the only way to GO to the South Pole is to use the power of numbers to scare the mercenary guards of the South Pole into refusing their current paid-mission of using lethal force to prevent all individuals from going to the South Pole. And now, imagine that the South Pole is not the only tunnel. Imagine there are various tunnels in various places which the world's actual rulers have blocked off using their proxy governments and governmental mercenary armies. This is the kind of revolutionary Storm The Gates fantasy which I would like to see changed from the ideal to the real. But again, no solitary individual can successfully storm the gates, but if enough of us individuals were to band together as an 'us' with the common goal of freedom, there is a CHANCE, however so slight, that we could leave a better world for our children, and maybe even enjoy the better fruits and reduced toil in our own individual lifetime.)

Really, if you want to keep wasting my time and energy and impugning my character, you should say something logical like "Your fantasy is impossible" instead of your strange current "Your fantasy is immoral" vibe.

I hear you repeatedly saying "The slaves want this slavery, the turkeys are voting for Christmas. And thus any attempt to change the minds of the turkeys is akin to tyrannical force. Stop voicing your opinion that the turkeys should not allow themselves to be enslaved and their lives eaten by the owners. They no longer eat us anymore (although the rich do still take aborted babies, which people abort due to unequal distribution of resources, and thus the rich do indeed inject those aborted babies' stem cells into their rich bodies for longer lives and better health, and the rich do also pay living adults for their blood for transfusions, so the rich are in fact de-facto still eating other humans, just indirectly). Anyway, you shouldn't imagine killing them, and you shouldn't imagine stealing resources back from them so that people no longer feel the need to abort their babies. Stop telling the turkeys to defend their lives, and stop telling the turkeys to take back the world's resources! Just leave the current situation as it is. Let it be. Be peaceful and passive. Take no action. Individuals want this status quo. A revolutionary redistribution to all of resources would actually result in LESS fruit in the hands of the people. $30,000 median lives is all we can hope for. Plus, I've got a $60,000 salary, so I'm above the median, so I definitely don't want to accept a step down to $30,000 like you, you factory worker. I can't even hear your calculation of 8 billion individuals suddenly having $1,000,000 each. To me, all I can hear is 'revolution' which I have been trained to associate with 'communism' which I have been trained to associate with 'poor people ruled by rich oligarchs' and thus I cannot even imagine a Mr. Robot situation where the assets are instantly spread out equally to 8 billion individuals WITHOUT any government grabbing it."

And yet you know full well nobody wants to be enslaved, the 'turkeys' as you call the 8 billion enslaved humans, simply were born into this enslaved life, so they literally have no experience of the feeling of freedom to compare with the present enslavement. They 'agree' to this because they haven't yet imagined there is another way. The voting which you refer to is all rigged. It is the poorness of the 99% and the ability of the 1% to buy-off the 10% of accomplices/agents/guards (desperate people who will do anything for a salary) this bribery ability inherent in the unequal land/resource/money current situation which I keep mentioning) which fraudulently convinces the 'turkeys' in your analogy to currently be mainly non-cognizant of the unfairness of their situation (since neither the mainstream story-writers nor the alternative story-writers admit the extent of the birth-to-death slavery system existing now) and thus they are mainly too meek to even contemplate fighting the ultimate masters (since the masters have some paid guards with weapons and shields which the turkeys can't afford, again, due to the unequal access to resources from birth) and thus your claim that they are "voluntarily choosing all this" is refusing to admit they are not properly informed when signing those contracts, and they are not properly informed when signing the birth certificate contract placing their children into tribute slavery from the moment of birth, and they sign all these contracts both in written and verbal form under duress, so your "they are choosing this, end of conversation" cop-out is flawed. Nobody chooses to be born into a world where 99% of the parents are serfs without land, born into a situation where they must turn daily toil fruits of labor over to higher-up rulers or starve, and where the ability to roam freely (and eat wild fruit, and set up gardening camps to grow more fruit, wherever the current weather is to their liking, wherever and whenever they please) has been de-facto outlawed since it is all parceled and owned by private rich and governmental rich, with their Federal parks being a Federal crime to live on.

Anyway, I still am surprised by the strange behavior of this possible AI program whom I am sending ideas to and receiving words from. Here, I'll type more words directly to 'you', to show 'good faith', to 'give you the benefit of the doubt', to imagine there is some logical reason why you refuse to prove your realness through a live audio/video conversation, since it would be 'dangerous' for you to show your face or even allow me to hear your voice. It seems you are contradicting yourself in ways which don't make sense. For example, in the Rome Enclosure thread you made it clear you feel basically "All individuals are enslaved by masters since all individuals must pay tribute (taxes)", but then to me in the Usselo thread you wasted time and energy by trying to bring us back to square one by saying "Do bad masters exist? Do masters even exist?" just a few days ago. Are you just playing semantic argument games, or are you actually serious about the fact (which you have admitted) that we are born into slavery?

Perhaps you are merely on the level of "I don't want pay so much taxes to the government, I would like to pay less." ? Is that it? I mean, if that's the limit to your ability to realize and speak up about the current total enslavement of the entire world, well, congratulations on having made it to the "lower tax please" stage, you are slightly more cognizant than most people, but still your conclusion of "Anyone whose ideals go beyond tax reduction is too far out, and I'm going to spend time trying to get him to reign his ideas back down to the meritocracy of my own" seems illogically too meek to me.

And now, here in this thread, your "moral conundrum" analogy of just some dude convincing some other dude to kill some third dude doesn't seem analogous. It seems on one hand you have been trying to imply, "Your words are going to lead some fool to go kill some innocent dude!" Which brings us back to when you were saying, "Who is on your kill list?" And then you offered a strawman list of a bunch of lower level folks who are not the top of the pyramid. Your goal then was to paint me as someone whose words was going to wrongfully lead an individual to harm some innocent individual victim who has never harmed anyone. Why would you do that, knowing full well I keep saying the world's actual wealthiest owners. It seems you are implying the world's wealthiest owners have not harmed anyone, when you say "Do masters exist? And do you have proof that masters are bad?"

So there, you are contradicting yourself with your self-contradictory "All are enslaved" "Masters don't exist" stances. And while doing so, it seems to me you willfully are/were misconstruing my actual words about only targeting the top actual unknown masters of this dimension. Basically aliens, even though Usselo doesn't want to call them that. We are blend of them and whatever else was here before them. They are simply those with a higher percent of alien genes. They have near-immortality genes which they created for themselves, and they have super technology far beyond what they dribble out to us. And they literally are the masters of the masters of the masters. They are the ultimate top of this enslavement pyramid, and obviously I don't know how many kilometers underground their secret bases are. So this is all a theoretical "Find the aliens at the top of the world control pyramid and let's end this enslavement" fantasy. Meanwhile, as I'm righteously painting a dream for future generations to consider, some guy keeps walking in basically implying, "You are trying to force some individual to kill some innocent individual." And yet, even though you are making that totally wrong claim, for some reason, perhaps as a back-pedal, after painting me as some danger to individuals, you now seem to be implying that you think the word-speaker would NOT be responsible, only the guy who foolishly goes and kills someone is responsible. Which implication are you trying to make? You said in Usselo's thread it would be moral for an individual to kill a police officer committing the act of a suspicionless stop, but at the same time you imply it would be immoral for individuals to kill the world's wealthiest 100 enslaving the 8 billion. Which is it? You said it would simply be hard for an individual to get away from society's wrongful reaction to the individual's inherent right to use any means necessary to protect himself against the unlawful kidnapping by some guy in a special hat with a government issued gun paid for by gun-coerced tribute-taxes, yet moral. Yet you keep implying that doing the same thing to the world's wealthiest 100 would be immoral. And, nevermind the killing in self-defense of freedom idea, how about the lesser action of simply taking aback from the world's wealthiest Robin Hood style without killing anyone. Can you finally now admit the morality of that? Taking back of all the land, and it should only be done by the majority of the 8 billion individuals supposedly alive today. You said basically "If the majority of slaves agree to be farmed, then that's their choice." Well, in the same way, I reply "If the majority of slaves stop agreeing to be farmed, and use lethal force against the ultimate top farmers to save their own lives, then that's their choice too."

Summary: You keep talking about individual rights, and you even admitted you think an innocent person being wrongfully prevented from walking freely (wrongfully kidnapped and threatened with imprisonment for merely walking and for merely refusing to comply with unlawful demands, by a weapon-carrying special-hat-wearer-given-authority-by-the-group) is morally right to prevent himself from being wrongfully thrown into a cage by the weapon toting bandit. Well, what is an individual morally allowed to do, in your mind, to take back the wealth from the world's wealthiest 100 individuals to distribute equally to the world's poorest 8 million individuals? If the answer is, "That is morally fine", then next can you admit a solitary individual can not do that alone, and that 'we' need to cooperate and unite as a 'group' to even have the slightest chance of achieving this worthy goal? Or are you still going to keep implying that such equal redistribution of resources to all 8 billion individuals (say, $1,000,000 each and 10km each) would HARM the 8 billion individuals, comparatively more than the harm which they are suffering now from being born into a zero assets zero land enslavement forcing them to work for the benefit of landlords and company presidents?

What is your ideal world, in your "Don't unite for any common goal" individual utopia? What life do you want to create for yourself and for your descendants, and how do you think you as an individual can achieve that? How can you personally individually achieve freedom of free time when you are literally forced to work for some president to pay some landlord and to pay for required-for-survival daily fruit? Are you somehow a self-sufficient individual owning land with fruit trees? Or are you stuck in a company group like the rest of us slaving away in a group collective yet hypocritically saying you want to keep your individuality by not joining a group of revolutionary action-minded action-takers? Please, seriously, tell me how your inaction style is creating freedom for yourself? What ideas do you have that are better than those which I'm advocating? C'mon, don't be shy, don't hide your feelings like you're hiding your face and voice. Instead of sniping about how I am Wrong, please tell what are the Right actions to take in this life. Please, I beg you, share your philosophy and your daily way of earning fruit in a free way without being exploited.

 

[Observer]

OK, as promised, here, I'm pasting below the private letter which I sent to Feralimal a month ago, in reply to his private letter to me in which he shared with me a recent summary of his current thinking about word usage, which I paraphrase his main point in his PDF as basically: "Individuals shouldn't use the word 'we', for example 'we went to the moon', since not only is that sentence wrong (since the Apollo videos were of course faked), but since it is also wrong to use the word 'we' even for things which other humans have actually done, since there is no such thing as 'we', there is no such thing as 'humanity', there are only separate individuals, separate individuals are never a group, and thinking of ourselves as one big family/species/group is committing the ultimate sin of collectivism which is the biggest killer of freedom."

Hi Feralimal

Interesting thoughts which you wrote there. Basically, "It's crazy to use the term 'we'."

I have thought and am still thinking many conflicting things about what words we should use.

(And what thoughts we should think, and most importantly above all what actions we should do.)

I remember when I was writing some great (in my opinion) ideas about "How shall we should revolt?"

Meaning, what concrete actions shall we (the group of enslaved) do to revolt to gain freedom from the rulers.

You'll see I started thinking out loud about this subject, from "March 10th, 2015", within my best posts pasted below.

Somewhere (I can't seem to find it now) HoiPolloi illogically tried to paint my sentences as wrong for using the word 'we'.

Basically, "I don't trust you, you're not in my group, you're not my brother, you're a shill, so don't even try to use the word 'we'."

He shrouded it in the "there is no such thing as humanity" stance, but I think he was actually simply trying to imply the sentence above.

It was a surprise to me, because I felt (and still do) that we, the group of animals calling ourselves humans, SHOULD unite as one, "I & I" Bob Marley style. (Notice the Rastafari idea that there is no 'you', no 'other', no 'separation' between the life spark which exists in us all, there is only 'we', a family of brothers and sisters united as one, and yet the 'I & I' phrase still allows the paradoxically individualistic word 'I' to still be used.

I felt smacked down by Simon's buddy HoiPolloi (who I still wonder if he is a shill himself) and started second-guessing myself into thinking I needed to focus on using the word 'individual', as I did in my following posts.

But still, I felt, and still do feel, that we DO need to see ourselves as (albeit individual) one-goal-united cells OF ONE WHOLE BODY which is the one Human species group, doing what is in the best interests of the survival and thrival of the species as a whole. The left hand should not be fighting against the right hand. The cells in the body should not be fighting against each other.

Yes, individual freedom for each individual body/cell to do what you want is vitally important, and yet, while keeping that freedom, I still feel there are actual actions that are harmful to the group and actual actions that are beneficial to the group. Unfortunately, some corrupted cells (a very small percentage) have decided to do ultra-selfish actions to gain resources at the expense of the rest of the cells, and these 1% of the cells have now convinced 99% of the cells that this is normal, and now they have created such crazy ideas that if a cell like me tries to say to the rest of the group "let's remember we are supposed to do what is in the best interests of the body as a whole" even the best-performing cells shout back, "No, there is no whole, there is only individual cells, you are advocating fascism/communism/socialism/group-think/borg-mind/less-of-freedom, by even using the word we, and by even suggesting there are actions which 'we' should do!"

See, it's interesting that you used the (I still think very true) "they gave us their mind" idea at the end there, because actually I think one of the falsehoods contained in their mind which they gave to us through words was: the false idea of separation from each other, and from our environment itself, with the words 'you' and 'I' itself. That's what separates us unhappy 'human' animals from the rest of the content animals: this "I" (literally defined as separation from all the rest, suddenly it's your body separated from everything else, fighting against everyone else and everything else, no more sense of wholeness, and no more sense of cooperation.)

As Bob Marley sang, "They don't want to see us unite, all they want us to do is keep on fussing and fighting, they don't want to see us live together, all they want us to do is keep on killing one another."

"But wait a second, even your hero Bob Marley is using words such as 'they', aren't all such words continuing to propagate the false sense of separateness?"

Yes, it's such a deep question. What words should we use, when there are actually cells enslaving the rest of the cells. Cells which literally tell themselves and their children that they are different from the rest of the cells. Cells which say "We Levites are above human, the rest of the jews are simply human, and all non-jews are sub-human".

Right now, I still feel we (the relatively healthy less-corrupted cells) should unite to kill (!) the corrupted cells (cells which have amassed more than a billion times more resources than their fair share of the resources which should be available for all the cells in the body. So I guess I'm not really saying "Kill the Levites", since I happen to be one (supposedly), but rather I am saying "Kill the rich!"

"Kill the rich" sounds scary to people who think "Hey, some rich amassed their collection of billions fairly" and/or "Hey, I've got a million dollars, or at least a fantasy of amassing a million dollars, so I don't like this 'kill the rich' idea at all!"

And yes, by saying "kill the rich" I have fallen into the trap of allowing myself to be painted as a dangerous cell, a cell who is advocating violence between cells, and thus the ruling cells have convinced the majority of cells that a cell like me should be locked up in a cage (haha, coincidentally called a cell) for advocating the enslaved resource-deprived cells should unite to get rid of the corrupted few cells in our humanity body which are damaging the entire body with their hoarding of resources.

I guess I need to tone it down to more of a Robin Hood message like the hero of the Mr. Robot series, who merely (spoiler alert) wipes out debt records at the end of season one and then takes it to the next step at the end of season two by stealing from the rich and distributing it to everyone else.

Actually, if you search for the word "Reset" in my writings posted below, you'll see I was suggesting (in 2015) that we should have a "Big Reset" of redistributing resources fairly: my "Reset" idea was very positive (in my opinion) and so it's interesting yet sad for me to see that my idea was twisted by them.

Meaning, this is megalomaniac to say, but it's possible some rulers noticed my 2015 "Big Reset" idea publicly-posted at Clues Forum and decided to thus preemptively attack the dangerous-to-them idea of such an inequality-to-equality "Big Reset" by instead creating their "Great Reset" blackwash, where instead of the take-back-the-resources-from-the-richest reset I had advocated, which would result in all humans getting placed on an equal starting-line with a millionaire level of resources for each person, the richest instead proposed and are succeeding in installing their totally opposite "Great Reset" tactic in which all the slaves become even FURTHER absolutely deprived of resources.

But anyway, back to the less controversial subject of what words are correct to use. I have thought a lot about what words to use, for example in writing songs, and in daily life.

For example, instead of saying "Pass my pen" how about "Pass the pen." There is no need to say my pen, or my idea. There are simply pens, ideas, apples, which we all share freely without hoarding.

And perhaps there is no need for saying "I" or "you". Just as the "I & I" idea is pretty high, we can go even higher by dropping all of that altogether. Which means speaking in more general terms. Instead of "Be careful, I saw a tiger there" we could say "Be careful, a tiger is there."

But yes, already, this conflicts with the idea of "The rulers have been using this style of 'news-reporting' in which they take a lie, and state it as a fact, and don't attach to that claim an actual human who takes responsibility for their claim being true or not, and thus we should always have each claim linked to who is making the claim."

Actually, in addition to the "claims should always have the claim-maker's name attached" reason, maybe the "I saw a tiger" sentence is actually better than the "a tiger is over there" sentence for a second reason as well: past tense is better than present tense.

Yes, just as you Alex are thinking about "shall we stop using the word we", I have been thinking "shall we stop using present tense".

I think present tense is inherently illogical, and is misnamed as well. What is happening right now, for example "I am typing a letter to Alex" should be called present tense, because that is what is happening right now in the present. Instead, we call such sentences "Present Continuous / Present Progressive". What we label "Present Tense" is actually "Always Tense." For example, here is a sentence which is called Present Tense: "I write letters to Alex." Can you see the craziness of Present Tense yet? It implies this is something I always do. The reality is, we cannot and should not program ourselves into assuming that just because something happened in the past that it will happen again in the future. The reality is: I have written letters to Alex, I wrote letters to Alex. But I don't know if I will write letters to Alex again in the future.

"I saw a tiger there yesterday" is correct. But that does not guarantee "A tiger is there now" is true. When we make sentences (oops, when I make sentences) (oops, when I made sentences in the past, yes, that's better). When I made sentences in the past, usually my goal was to point out a fact which I noticed, for the benefit of the listener, since the listener could benefit from knowing that fact which I noticed, and because I hoped the listener would reward me with a fact which they noticed, and thus thanks to that fair exchange of facts, we both would have a higher chance of getting what we want, which is more safety from death or pain, more resources like food, more free time, less personal energy expenditure, etc. Oh no, I used the word we again. Oh no, I assumed and implied that we all want "more safety from death or pain, more resources like food, more free time, less personal energy expenditure", how silly of me.

The point I was trying to make was: telling people what we saw with our own eyes in the past tense is better (due to being closer to reality) than using "Present Tense / Always Tense". For example, instead of "A tiger lives there" I should say "I saw a tiger there yesterday. I also saw a tiger eat a human many years ago. Based on those 2 things I saw, I didn't go there for berries today."

Oh man, can you see how much of a waste of time this mental masturbation of writing is, Alex? I have so many more ideas about what we should say, which I simply would prefer speaking instead of writing.

Basically, we should be trying to use words to get people to do things. Call it manipulation, or call it simply being effective. The question is: what should we try to convince others to do? As long as we are trying to get humans to do something which is good for the benefit of all humans, we should do exactly that.

No, I don't agree with the idea that "doing what is best for all is in conflict with doing what is best for the individual." I think doing what is best for all humans is killing all tigers and all humans who are enslavers. The enslavers have convinced folks that equality doesn't work, but the reality is equality has never been tried. They have convinced us that we are all individuals who need to be competing instead of cooperating, and that anyone who says "Let's cooperate" is trying to be a communist fascist controller.

There is such a thing as we. We humans should be united against all animals who wish to eat us. I don't include non-humans in my definition of we. Tigers who eat animals are dangerous. I am an animal who does not eat animal. I, like a deer, am not dangerous to other animals, because I don't eat animals, I only eat plants. But if a tiger comes close to me or my children, I will and should kill the tiger dead.

Should I run away? Should I just take my children and try to find a little bubble of land where the tigers can't find us? Or should I and my deer family (all deer everywhere) kill all animal-eating-animals so that we plant-eating-animals can finally relax without fear of some blood-drinking parasites coming and trying to steal our lives.

Anyway, again, I keep getting side-tracked. Oops, I got side-tracked. I have been side-tracked many times in my life. That is no guarantee that I will continue to get side-tracked. Haha.

OK, there are various ideas which I have had about writing songs, or composing sentences for daily life. I am not following any of these rules yet. One idea is to stop saying 'I' or 'you', but to say 'we' instead. We all like eating, and sleeping, and having sex. To only talk about what we have in common, to unite us. Another idea is to not talk about possessions, so no more 'my', 'your', etc. (But of course I know they have blackwashed that no-possession share-all-resources-equally idea into the "You slaves will own nothing and will like it" plan.) Another idea is to stop using present tense, or even future tense. To only talk about what we have seen, and what we have done. But of course, the problem is these ideas conflict with each other, for example the "tell who saw what" idea conflicts with the "stop creating a false division between cells" idea.

Oh, and I should mention some things which I learned about English through learning Japanese. Japanese usually drops the subject. So Japanese doesn't say "I saw a tiger." Japanese just says "Tiger, saw." And Japanese doesn't have future tense. But only deep-level people know this: neither does English, actually. "I'm going to stay home tomorrow" is not actually Future tense, it's present-continuous/progressive being used to talk about a future plan. And even "I will stay home tomorrow" is just a shortened form of "I have the will/intention/intent/plan to stay home tomorrow". There actually is no future tense in English, just as there is no future tense in Japanese. And perhaps this makes sense, since nobody can say what "will" happen in the future. We can only talk about what we think will happen.

And back to attacking the use of present tense, all "I think" sentences are wrong, since we really are limiting ourselves with such sentences. "I'm currently thinking" is better, since it reminds us that with new information our ideas about patterns of life should and can change.

Oh, and there is the "let's stop using the word 'is'" idea, which some folks pushed in the past, I forgot the name of this language and don't feel like looking it up now, perhaps you know it, the idea that conflict is started by sentences such "A is X, B is Y" and thus we should say "A seems X to me, and B seems Y to me" but to me that is just a cop-out because it is simply replacing 'is' with 'seems to me', and thus one is still talking about the patterns one has found but one is simply saying "I could be wrong", "everything is (oops) subjective", "there are (oops) no absolute facts", and also the problem with that style of speaking is: it doesn't go far enough. If the people who push that way of speaking admit all forms of "be" (is/am/are/etc) should not be used, then why not admit all present-tense verbs should also not be used as well. If "John is enslaved by Ari" must be changed to "John seems enslaved by Ari" then why are we giving the verb "seems" a free pass, just because it meekly says "seems, seems to me, I'm not sure about the situation, I have no confidence in my pattern-finding ability, there are no facts in life, it's all just a bunch of opinions". If the proponents of that "don't use any form of 'be'" language were serious, they would go all the way and say "don't use any present tense verbs at all, since 'Ari enslaves John' itself states a pattern, and we can't state patterns, since patterns don't exist."

Argh, so many ideas, conflicting with each other. Yes, they (the alien spirits from outside this concave earth) gave us their corrupted mind, which became our mind, with all these words which inherently conflict. Before having children, I had this lovely idea of raising my children somewhere in a natural setting WITHOUT ANY WORDS AT ALL.

Yes, society would call that abuse of the worst kind, raising children without them ever hearing a single word. No outside contact with society, and no passing of words from me. I would simply say nothing, while giving them food and showing them through my actions how to plant/collect food.

Society would call that "preventing the children from receiving the essential communication tool of language" but I would call it "preventing the children from being infected with the mind virus of words which the alien spirits cursed us with long ago".

But, for better or for worse, I didn't inherit a million dollars, or even a hundred dollars, so I couldn't and didn't achieve my dream of living in a self-sufficient freeman-living-off-private-land-or-in-some-secluded-undiscovered-island with zero-contact-with-the-rest-of-humans paradise.

Anyway, today, I once again thought about the beginning of the first Redman album in which he began by prompting himself to imagine how would he create his first album, what would he say, how would he say it, what words would he speak: "Focus your mind, Focus your mind, Focus your mind."

(I'll paste my CluesForum posts below, so you can Ctrl+F search for the times when I wrote the word "reset".)

And again, this idea is not new to me, for example, I love the short story by Samuel Langhorne Clemens (Mark Twain), in which he says "Man is a Machine", and goes on to say that no man should feel proud of the accomplishments of others, since he can only be proud of what he has done, and even then, a man should not be even proud of his own accomplishments, since he simply inherited by chance a certain kind of body with certain abilities, so stop being proud of anything at all, and also by the way stop being proud of 'your' culture, which also you were simply born into, a bunch of ideas which came to your area by force, and over the generations the children of the physically raped and mentally raped victims start to be proud of their received genetics and ideas, even though it all was foreign and forced initially.

So, as promised, here, I'm pasting below that short story by Mark Twain:

What is Man? (Man is a Machine)

And yes, as promised, I will paste my revolutionary CluesForum 2015 posts, within the next few days.

 

[Starfire]

Hi. I really learned a lot from the first half of your post and it was quite easy to read. I pulled out my bible to check things you said (mine translated kanesh-bosm as fragrant cane) and thought about sacred smoke in the framework of religion. I'm trying to vape more than smoke to stay away from impurities, as you suggested. And I'm seriously considering DMT.

---------

When I was in my 20's in Seattle I was friends with a Rastafarian family. I stayed overnight sometimes because I usually couldn't drive too good after hanging out with them. Being the questioning person I am, I asked all about their religion and they obliged to tell me anything I wanted to know. One night I passed on the third or fourth giant spliff because I was plenty altered. I was told that "This is when you keep going, beyond the point you want to stop." So I kept smoking.

I ended up having a pretty intense experience. There was a being who visited me. I say being because I knew he wasn't human, but he looked just like a human in my minds eye. He was fair skinned, blondish and well proportioned, dressed in a woodland outfit like Elvin buckskin. He didn't say anything exceptional to me, just reassurance that there was more beyond our world. It freaked me out a little bit. I have never seen him again. I also have never been that altered again, so maybe that's why.

I forgot to ask back then, but I wonder if the beings my friends must have seen when they 'went beyond' were a black man or woman with long dreadlocks? I'm a fair skinned woman of Irish descent and I saw what I now recognize as a Tuatha De Danann. I think that the being would manifest as an image familiar to the person's cultural experience.

I realize now that I probably reached that same place that people do with DMT. I didn't see the black and white patterned beings because I took a different route to get there.

Speaking of which, I can't remember if you talked about the concept of 'The Nephilem Look Like Clowns' in the thread. This concept seems fanciful at first, but the ideas stack up in a big enough pile to be worth considering. Some of these ideas being:
• Modern day representations of clowns and harlequins don't really have a good explanation - specifically the white face, red hair, red mouth and nose, and the stripes and geometric patterns that make up their costumes
• Multiple indigenous cultures have ritual traditions that include costumes or body paint with the features I just mentioned above
• The beings that many people see when taking DMT have the features mentioned above, especially the lines and geometric patterns making up their faces and body, not just greasepaint and a costume like the clowns
• The harlequins and jesters were advisors to the kings whose court they were attached to, they may have been a cargo cult remnant of the shaman whose role it was to take the sacred plant/mushroom/elixer and converse with the stripey beings in the other dimension, or they may have been actively taking the sacred medicines and actively engaging the stripey beings, this frequent use of the sacred medicines could have the side effect of erratic behavior and could be why they were also the comedy relief for their king and court
• Per the Book of Enoch, the Nephilem were unable to leave our realms when they died because they were created against the laws of nature, and today people think the beings seen in the dimension accessed by DMT are these very same Nephilem (or Titans)
• When the Nephilem were alive they were probably cannibalistic giants with fair skin and red hair who were either very sloppy and careless eaters who had blood stains all around their mouth and nose or they had red beards and mustaches - like a tall Bozo the Clown

Here's a couple different series regarding this idea:


View: https://youtu.be/NYbJNdxyu5Y?si=foysiVsvniuaHw7R



View: https://youtu.be/xd8FjqszXqk?si=SPXrYHT1wX704e88


---------

There's one last thing I wanted to bring up.

I'm wondering why you went so far off track at post #20, and why you have continued? It's interesting reading, but has nothing to do with the subject of the thread. Please go back to DMT and cannabis related info and consider creating a different thread for everything after post #19. Not trying to offend. I really did enjoy and learn from the first half.

 

[Observer]

First: Thank you for visiting and sharing with me. Gratitude. 感謝。心より感謝申し上げます。

I'm very interested in hearing from you, a fellow red-haired angel avatar, this is a rare blessing.

Thanks to you, I learned for the first time about Tuatha Dé Danann. Our true family members. Nice!

I'll paste the nice summary I instantly found about them below, but now here I'll continue writing to you.

I'm going to take your good advice, of separating the Cannabis and DMT topic from all the other topics here.

Please give me some time to do that, and until then, please forgive the continued combining of the subjects.

I have come to the conclusion we Red-haired beings are the highest beings of Intelligence & Justice & Love
(each race has their own positive specializations, I'm simply sure we Red-haired beings excel in those areas).

That's what I'm sure of, by Knowing My Self. and My Self is respectfully pointing to Knowing Ones Higher Self.

The details, I'm not sure about: I think first we first arrived to Ireland (I don't know how, or from where: perhaps by using land/sea/air vehicles, or maybe just by walking, perhaps arriving from tunnels underwater or underground which connect our concave-bubble-cavity-world to other concave-bubble-cavity-worlds, perhaps we simply are spiritual vibrations which suddenly began physically manifesting as bodies, again I don't know the details) and then I think in Ireland our culture became known as Druid, and then from Ireland we spread our culture east, and then our culture eventually arrived to the fertile crescent, where it became corrupted when there, and that led to the corrupted Jewish culture, with even the word Jewish itself being a corrupted form of the word Druid. And then of course, after the Semites corrupted the original Druid culture of light into becoming the the Jewish culture of darkness, then the Phoenicians, then the final corruption was when the Khazarians converted to Judaism and as Ashkenazim took over the title of Jewish and subsequently corrupted things even further, and unfortunately now these corrupted usurpers non-benevolently control the resources of this world.

But back to Cannabis, you and I need to begin eating it, both to increase potency and to save money. I remember being fooled when I was younger into thinking eating was the wasteful way to take in Cannabis, that eating Cannabis required three times as much to get as high as smoking or vaporizing it, but it now turns out the opposite is true: eating it is seven times more powerful than smoking or vaporizing it. It seems the whole "Don't make brownies, that's not cost-effective, only smoke or vape it" claim which I received as a youth was simply to bring in 21-times more profit for the CIA selling it to us. And unfortunately, even to this day, I still continue the bad habit of smoking or vaping it. I really need to gain the courage to start cooking it and eating it from now on, so that I can see if this current admittance of "30 milligrams of cooked eaten Cannabis is as powerful as 2.1 grams of smoked or vaped Cannabis" is really true.

So, to get high, I want to start shifting from smoking to vaping to Eating. And then, if and when I one day have lots of legal Cannabis plants, then I'll gain the courage and the ability to start eating and drinking it Raw, as shown in the "The Power of Raw Cannabis" video, since that allows us to get the CBD healing without the THC highness. So, imagine drinking 10 or 20 grams daily of Raw Cannabis for the CBD health, homeostasis, and the confidence which CBD gives. There was a study in which people were shown scary images sober versus on THC versus on CBD. The result conclusion proven is CBD reduces fear and gives confidence. So, eating Cannabis Raw should be done every day for health and confidence, and then as an optional bonus, eating cooked Cannabis should be done whenever one wants to get high.

OK, I have a lot more to say about your experience, which right now I want to thank you for having shared. Thank you. Seriously. Thank you. Your experience gives me hope that our Immortal Angel Druid Ancestors are still here, in both Spiritual and Physical form, and that they are ready and eager to help us, as we are Family, and our goal is to Intelligently Lovingly create a Just environment to flourish and thrive.

I have to go be a slave at a food factory now, so I must stop typing now, but after work I'll comment more on the other things which you brought up in your lovely post above.

Again, I feel Gratitude for the blessing of you Blessing this thread with your Grace. Gratitude from my Heart to You.

Tuatha Dé Danann

Tuatha Dé Danann​

People of the goddess Danu” Tuatha Dé Danann” are supernatural Irish deities who dwell in the “otherworld” but frequently interact with humans.

According to legend – these gods landed on the Irish coastline surrounded by a cloud. Depending on which version you read, they either descended from the heavens in a dark could onto a mountain, or arrived by boat.

Those who claim the latter, allege the Tuatha Dé Danann burned their boats upon arrival. The smoke and ash thrown into the air created the cloud many claimed to see.

They originated from four cities north of Ireland–Falias, Finias, Gorias, and Murias. It was said this is where they attained their magical attributes.

Upon their arrival to Ireland, they engaged in the first battle of Mag Tuireadh defeating the firblog. (Greek descendants of Nemed who previous settled in Ireland.) A second battle of Mag Tuireadh was waged where the Tuatha Dé Danann conquered a race of giants known as the Fomorians. Rather than drive them out, the Tuatha Dé Danann gave the Fomorians Connacht – a providence in the west part of Ireland.

The third battle was fought against the Milesians, the last race to settle in Ireland and the current inhabitants. Three kings of the Tuatha Dé Danann asked for a truce for three days in which the Milesians would anchor a distance of nine waves off shore. The Milesian’s agreed and the Tuatha Dé Danann attempted to drive them away by creating a storm. A Milesian poet calmed the sea with his canto and the Milesian people came and defeated the Tuatha Dé Danann. The Tuatha Dé Danann themselves were later sent to the underworld in an agreement where the Milesians received the land above ground, and the Tuatha Dé Danann below. To this day the Tuatha Dé Danann live below ground in a world invisible to humans. They now go by the name Aes sidhe, and will fight beside mortals in battle armed with lances of blue flame and shields of pure white.

 

[Starfire]

I'm very interested in hearing from you, a fellow red-haired angel avatar, this is a rare blessing.

Thanks to you, I learned for the first time about Tuatha Dé Danann. Our true family members. Nice!

I'll paste the nice summary I instantly found about them below, but now here I'll continue writing to you.

I'm going to take your good advice, of separating the Cannabis and DMT topic from all the other topics here.

Please give me some time to do that, and until then, please forgive the continued combining of the subjects.

I have come to the conclusion we Red-haired beings are the highest beings of Intelligence & Justice & Love
(each race has their own positive specializations, I'm simply sure we Red-haired beings excel in those areas).

That's what I'm sure of, by Knowing My Self. and My Self is respectfully pointing to Knowing Ones Higher Self.

The details, I'm not sure about: I think first we first arrived to Ireland (I don't know how, or from where: perhaps by using land/sea/air vehicles, or maybe just by walking, perhaps arriving from tunnels underwater or underground which connect our concave-bubble-cavity-world to other concave-bubble-cavity-worlds, perhaps we simply are spiritual vibrations which suddenly began physically manifesting as bodies, again I don't know the details) and then I think in Ireland our culture became known as as Druid, and then from Ireland we spread our culture east, and then our culture eventually arrived to the fertile crescent, where it became corrupted when there, and that led to the corrupted Jewish culture, with even the word Jewish itself being a corrupted form of the word Druid. And then of course, after the Semites corrupted the original Druid culture of light into becoming the the Jewish culture of darkness, then the Phoenicians, then the final corruption was when the Khazarians converted to Judaism and as Ashkenazim took over the title of Jewish and subsequently corrupted things even further, and unfortunately now these corrupted usurpers non-benevolently control the resources of this world.

But back to Cannabis, you and I need to begin eating it, both to increase potency and to save money. I remember being fooled when I was younger into thinking eating was the wasteful way to take in Cannabis, that eating Cannabis required three times as much to get as high as smoking or vaporizing it, but it now turns out the opposite is true: eating it is seven times more powerful than smoking or vaporizing it. It seems the whole "Don't make brownies, that's not cost-effective, only smoke or vape it" claim which I received as a youth was simply to bring in 21-times more profit for the CIA selling it to us. And unfortunately, even to this day, I still continue the bad habit of smoking or vaping it. I really need to gain the courage to start cooking it and eating it from now on, so that I can see if this current admittance of "30 milligrams of cooked eaten Cannabis is as powerful as 2.1 grams of smoked or vaped Cannabis" is really true.

So, to get high, I want to start shifting from smoking to vaping to Eating. And then, if and when I one day have lots of legal Cannabis plants, then I'll gain the courage and the ability to start eating and drinking it Raw, as shown in the "The Power of Raw Cannabis" video, since that allows us to get the CBD healing without the THC highness. So, imagine drinking 10 or 20 grams daily of Raw Cannabis for the CBD health, homeostasis, and the confidence which CBD gives. There was a study in which people were shown scary images sober versus on THC versus on CBD. The result conclusion proven is CBD reduces fear and gives confidence. So, eating Cannabis Raw should be done every day for health and confidence, and then as an optional bonus, eating cooked Cannabis should be done whenever one wants to get high.

OK, I have a lot more to say about your experience, which right now I want to thank you for having shared. Thank you. Seriously. Thank you. Your experience gives me hope that our Immortal Angel Druid Ancestors are still here, in both Spiritual and Physical form, and that they are ready and eager to help us, as we are Family, and our goal is to Intelligently Lovingly create a Just environment to flourish and thrive.

I have to go be a slave at a food factory now, so I must stop typing now, but after work I'll comment more on the other things which you brought up in your lovely post above.

Again, I feel Gratitude for the blessing of you Blessing this thread with your Grace. Gratitude from my Heart to You.

Tuatha Dé Danann

What enthusiasm! I am glad to help spark that for you. However, sadly for you, I am Dark Irish and not Red Irish, so my brown hair only gets reddish when I spend a LOT of time in the sun, and my eyes are more hazel than green. My father always said it was because the Spanish Armada got driven ashore by the storms and the lusty Spanish sailors ended up with the pretty red haired lasses.

I think you would enjoy this channel, they speak a lot about early Celtic influence on the world:


View: https://youtu.be/wBxA9BJFlqk?si=dkPMxw2_ZjQ4JRnm


----------

The moderators can help you split the thread.

----------

I will look into eating for increased effectiveness. I have a health issue it helps me with.

 

[Observer]

Today I thought deeply about your request, and about how silly it was for me to have suddenly made a promise due to unconsciously trying-to-please-some-potential-future-wife, haha, a promise which I should not have made, since although these ideas in this thread might seem insufficiently related to most folks, all of these ideas are strongly related in my mind and heart, so I'm going to continue sharing all of these related-to-me ideas on one thread, my P.E.R.F.E.C.T. thread, my personal oasis where interested folks can come and relax and enjoy whenever they want, while uninterested folks can simply ignore this thread and not even bother opening it when a new post is added to this thread, where I am always simply giving a monologue speech about various aspects of reality which I have realized, which is why I placed this thread in the Off-Topic section in the first place, thus this thread has the advantage of allowing me to not feel inclined to go walking into other people's threads anymore since of course that would result in me posting ideas which go far beyond the limited tiny sliver of reality which they feel obliged to limit both themselves and others to, a limitation which I feel prevents us from making progress towards a more comprehensive realization of reality and thus the subsequent most important actions we should begin implementing to align our present and future reality with the grandest ideals of our Higher Self.

Here is why all of these ideas I'm sharing are related: Cannabis helps one see reality more clearly, more clearly than others not using Cannabis can, and more clearly than one personally can without Cannabis, Cannabis is the ultimate Performance Enhancing Drug, since it helps one eat more and nap more and have sex more, the three most important actions for health, and then as a bonus it helps one realize reality more. It's like BabaRamDass (whom I called while he was still here, and he suggested I go to an Ashram where I stayed for 8 months) said when the people passed Proposition 215, while holding up a bag of recently-legalized-Medical-Cannabis, "Meditation works, but this works quicker!" and like Bob Marley said, basically, "The Herb is like a fruit, it makes the mind clear, getting Irie is not escaping into fantasy, it's the opposite, it puts one in the state of Reality, and all those who are not staying high have fallen into the state of illusion. Excuse me while I light this spliff (spliff), oh Lord I've got to take a lift (lift), from Reality I just can't drift (drift), that's why I'm staying with this riff (riff), ooo yeah!" Using the tool of Cannabis literally everyday from age 15 to 30 (and then from age 30 to present unfortunately merely a week each month due to supporting my 4 angelic children) truly helped me realize what I have realized so far, namely, all of the things which I am sharing in this P.E.R.F.E.C.T. thread. Using the tool of Cannabis, the muses or angels or my Higher Self or whatever we want to call divine inspiration led me to realize very important-to-me things such as: the fact Levites, which I supposedly am, each used kilograms of Cannabis daily (yet then wrongly claimed they were the only ones allowed to do so), and that Jesus broke their businessman middleman rule by using Cannabis himself and applying it on others to miraculously heal them while also telling them to go direct to the source when praying by contacting the ultimate benevolent creator, to no longer be fooled by the parasitic middlemen Levites, all shown in the initial 19 posts in this thread, as you mentioned. Basically, Cannabis is the Tree of Life, the most important plant within Earth, and my will is to legally eat it daily Raw for CBD homeostasis health and confidence, and to legally eat it daily heated for the addition of THC highness too.

And, continuing about how all of these topics are related, the essential plant-tool-spirit Cannabis helped me realize the importance of DMT, which also is essential for health, since using DMT is rewarded immediately by one's own body producing the essential HumanGrowthHormone molecule (HGH) which is literally what we need to survive and thrive, the reward for entering the spiritual-hyperspace-dream world of upload-and-download, the reason why we sleep daily, and the reason why we should focus more on sleeping 2 or 3 or 4 times daily, since we get that boost of HGH based on the number of times one dreams each day, NOT based on merely sleeping 8 hours at once thus only dreaming once a day.

(Note: Cannabis led me to a genius who realized and tested exactly that, the reality of sleeping an hour (or less) 4 times daily giving much more health-energy-vitality than sleeping 8 hours once daily. He was able to realize that by doing I.T. work from home as president of his own one-man company, thus captain of his own ship, controller of his own destiny, no longer paying tribute to a company president, and thus he became free to choose his own schedule and thus he became able to test this "Live like a Lion" technique of many naps daily, and he honestly and freely shared that with the world, and Cannabis helped me see the reality of his findings and Cannabis helped me see the reason why 4 naps-a-day produces such amazing results: it's because each time one takes a nap one gets a dream chance, which means internally producing DMT, which means internally producing HGH, which means internally producing health-energy-vitality. Thus, 4 naps-a-day produces more DMT-HGH-Health than the current societal mistake of sleeping just once daily. The first 90% of sleeping time does NOT result in RapidEyeMovement (R.E.M.), it is only the final 10% in which we enter the REM dreamtime. By the way, speaking of Dreamtime, AlienSpaceDreamtime with Terence McKenna about DMT is the video which I watched many years before the Joe Rogan video about DMT which inspired me to study at the DMT-Nexus.me where I successfully learned how to isolate pure DMT from all the toxic non-DMT tannins.)

Then, the connection to post #20 is we can see into the mind of a modern day Ashkenazi Israeli, just like my unrepentant Mossad father was, who even when faced with the fact that his culture proudly proclaims "all non-Jews are sub-human animals lacking human rights which only Jews deserve", he simply (due to his cultural indoctrination, his genes, and his NOT using Cannabis sufficiently) tried to convince me basically "all cultures do that, it's natural, stop criticizing such actions of your Jewish team". This is the self-deluding and everyone-deluding and making-excuses-for-deluding "lie whenever it benefits oneself" thinking of a mind and heart which has NOT used the Cannabis mirror to self-reflect and introspectively delve into one's self nor the reality in which one lives. All of my ideas which I am sharing in this thread are connected by the fact that these are realizations which one comes to when using proper amounts of the essential plant Cannabis, and post #20 shows how low one can go into selfishness and unfairness and dishonesty by NOT being high. Cannabis leads one into realizing the highest ideals of Justice for all, and specifically the CBD within Cannabis gives one the courage to admit reality to oneself and to others, regardless of the "I might be punished by the rulers if what I say is criticizing them" loyalty-loop which folks who do NOT use Cannabis especially display. Post #20 is a little hard to decipher, since it is showing a letter in which the unrepentant Ashkenazi Israeli replies to my letter, so it's a little confusing, but if you concentrate while reading that post you should be able to see which sentences are written by me (the righteous "I can admit the wrong actions of our ancestors and our currently living parents and cousins" sentences) and which sentences are written by him (the selfish excuse-making "it's a dog-eat-dog world, we Jews have no choice but to enslave the world, because otherwise the world would enslave us" sentences). So, to me, that conversation is totally related to the Levite subject, which is totally related to the Cannabis subject, which is totally related to the Red-Hair subject, which is totally related to the "Culture spread from Ireland, eastward towards the fertile crescent" idea, which, yes, Minds Unveiled did a great job sharing with us in that video which you shared and in the following video as well:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC1_a6ifCPg&t=2383s
That video should be watched from 39:43 (which is why the link I made starts at 2383 seconds), and don't be discouraged by the fact the honorable Minds Unveiled duo are wasting time arguing with someone (who started the time-wasting by arguing with them). It sure is sad that mainstream character tried verbally attacking Mind Unveiled's grand realizations about the truth of the "High culture started in the West, in Ireland (actually probably even further West, in a now sunken land between America and Ireland) then from Ireland moved east, eventually coming to the fertile crescent, where it became corrupted" reality, which is the opposite of the mainstream claims. And it is even more ironically sad that the naively-mainstream-believing character (who wasted time trying to slander the Unveild Minds duo) himself happens to have red-hair genes. Perhaps that time-wasting character is a paid actor with dyed hair and beard, perhaps it is a CGI deep fake, or perhaps it simply a sad reminder of how if one does not strongly use one's WILL to override the programming of the rulers, the programming which the majority of humans today are strongly under the control of, and if one does not strongly use the Cannabis tool to allow the muses to help one realize reality, the result can be: tragically, even a person with red-haired genes can end up wasting time regurgitating the lies of the mainstream stories. Oh well, at least the positive we can say about that time-waster is: at least Mind Unveiled positively won by not being drawn down to the arguer's level, and Mind Unveiled created an even more-in-depth "High Culture began in Ireland, by Red-Haired beings, then spread from Ireland outward" idea-sharing video which thankfully successfully made the journey to my heart and mind.

I have come to the conclusion we Red-haired beings are the highest beings of Intelligence & Justice & Love
(each race has their own positive specializations, I'm simply sure we Red-haired beings excel in those areas).

That's what I'm sure of, by Knowing My Self. and My Self is respectfully pointing to Knowing Ones Higher Self.

The details, I'm not sure about: I think first we first arrived to Ireland (I don't know how, or from where: perhaps by using land/sea/air vehicles, or maybe just by walking, perhaps arriving from tunnels underwater or underground which connect our concave-bubble-cavity-world to other concave-bubble-cavity-worlds, perhaps we simply are spiritual vibrations which suddenly began physically manifesting as bodies, again I don't know the details) and then I think in Ireland our culture became known as Druid, and then from Ireland we spread our culture east, and then our culture eventually arrived to the fertile crescent, where it became corrupted when there, and that led to the corrupted Jewish culture, with even the word Jewish itself being a corrupted form of the word Druid. And then of course, after the Semites corrupted the original Druid culture of light into becoming the the Jewish culture of darkness, then the Phoenicians, then the final corruption was when the Khazarians converted to Judaism and as Ashkenazim took over the title of Jewish and subsequently corrupted things even further, and unfortunately now these corrupted usurpers non-benevolently control the resources of this world.

Then, on page 2, the connection of Post #21 is this: Heavy Usage of Cannabis, which leverages even further the inherent Intelligent Love of Reality and Justice, which is the strong point of whatever Spirit lives within a Red-Heaired being like MySelf, leads one to the correct conclusion that: #1 we are enslaved, and #2 we must become free. The typist "online friend" who refused to have a Zoom chat or even a hidden-number phone call showed what a lack of Cannabis does to even supposedly intelligent people: the lack of the daily Cannabis essential causes a lack of the ability to break free from the loyalty loop programming which is both culturally and genetically imposed on most people to such a high degree that they flip between admitting we are enslaved to denying we are enslaved and bottom-line these people who haven't taken in sufficient amounts of Cannabis, thus people who haven't taken in sufficient amounts of CBD, thus people who haven't taken in sufficient amounts of Confidence Building Molecules, are afraid to consider taking action to free us from the enslavement, and are even afraid to even plant the seed of revolutionary "Let's get free, by distributing the Earth's resources to all for a fresh-start equal-starting-line, by any means necessary" idea which is required to change the current status quo of 99% of humans being born without their fair share of starting resources such as land and capital. Such non-Cannabis-activated people are unconsciously stuck in a loyalty loop, which they rationalize consciously by pointing to "past such attempts at Revolution, such as the Communist Revolution" which was in fact a fake controlled-opposition non-revolution non-equality psy-op with the Ashkenazi actor Karl Marx simply black-washing the whole idea of the majority taking back their integral and essential rights to equal access to the 40 billion free fruit trees the Earth continually provides. Thus the Ashkenazi sure have won, when this supposedly open-minded supposedly intelligent "thinker" sends me a manifesto that basically said, "speakers should not use the word 'we' or 'us' or 'humanity' or 'human team' or 'together' or 'Let's' or 'cooperate'', etc." In my opinion, that person, so proud of being an individual, and so vehemently against the idea of the poorest 99% uniting to take back what has been stolen and what is being unfairly hoarded by the richest 1%, has unfortunately been fooled by the Karl Marx Communism psy-op, which pre-emptively black washed the idea of any revolution wishing to create fairness, since due to that communism Psy-op, people now think my "Let's redistribute the 40 billion fruit trees fairly to all" idea as being somehow doomed to leading to starvation levels of poverty and death and fascism and tyranical control and rich oligarchs enslaving the 99% even more than the rich capitalists do. So, as a Cannabis-activated Revolutionary I felt and feel obliged to share my past and present Revolutionary ideas, again, strongly inspired by the spirit of Cannabis, which I think basically allows one to contact one's Ancestors-Muses-Angels-Higher-Self to a higher degree than if one were in the unnatural state of lowness and non-homeostasis which is caused by lacking the essential daily homeostasis-maintaining vitamin Cannabis. So that's what is happening on page 2 of this thread, from post #21 through post #32, as I'm sharing the ideas which heavy Cannabis usage allows one to collect-create-share-manifest.

Now, I still don't have the time or energy to properly touch on all the ideas which you raised in post #33, honorable Starfire, and even when I get some time on my next day off, I choose to continue posting my 2015 revolutionary ideas, so actually in my mind and heart even though you are being positive I should actually not allow myself to be distracted by your requests to change my goal. Currently, my thinking is basically: if we aren't working towards Robin Hood style taking from the richest 1% and giving to the poorest 99%, then we are falling into the trap of being distracted from the most important action we need to do. Basically, if we aren't physically killing all modern-day Kings, or at the very least talking rhetorically about how to do so, or at the very least talking about how to redistribute everything they have fairly to all (even including them, meaning, we can fairly leave the quadrillionaire with 1 million dollars and 1 square kilometer of arable land, as long as all 8 billion humans also are receiving 1million dollars and 1 square kilometer of land, see, when I say everyone deserves to be starting from the same exact starting line, to begin a true meritocracy race from that fair starting point of equal assets, I truly mean it, the problem is I can foresee such ultra selfish quadrillionaires not being willing to agree to us leaving them with "only" that, thus they will try to kill us Robin Hood style redistributors in which case if they try to kill us we will have to kill them in an actual self-defense manner, and thus, after doing the math, it's quite likely that even though we simply want to have everyone given 1 million dollars and 1 square kilometer of arable land, the net result is that if the quadrillionaires can not accept that literally fair deal, if they try killing more people to try to keep their quadrillions or their trillions or their billions, due to their not being satisfied with being left with just the same amount of assets as everyone else, well, then their attempts at murdering us will result in is killing them in self defense) then as long as we aren't talking and planning and implementing this fair redistribution to all humans living within Earth, then they are winning and we are losing. So, I'll simply say this about your post: I think all images and stories of Red-Haired beings looking evil and doing bad things are all psy-ops by non-red-haired rulers who are afraid of red-haired beings since red-haired beings have the least loyalty-loop programming and red-haired beings are the most courageous relative to all other humans and red-haired beings can leverage this inherent courage even further through our natural love of staying properly Cannabis-ized. Red-haired beings are scary to the rulers, which is why the rulers have released all these lies to the masses, which the masses simply regurgitate without thinking, about Red-haired beings being what people should be scared of. The reality is: what you should be scared of is your grandchildren being born into the same enslavement situation in which you are presently living: a situation where 99% make excuses for the entire Earth being ruled by 1%. So, to all those who think this is a situation that we should just "Let it be, Let it be" then the rulers' "Don't fix this injustice" cultural programming is working on you, and thus the status quo of you picking the fruit and them stealing the fruit from you every day will continue. Just as Usselo's thread is not interesting to people who refuse to admit we were until very recently being eaten by bad guys, so too, my thread is not interesting to people who refuse to admit we are still enslaved today, the richest are still eating babies but now legally in the form of stem cells, and as a Cannabis-activated Reality-Realizing Red-Haired being, I owe it to my ancestors watching me now to do my best to inspire us to unite to redistribute equally for our grandchildren, for our children, and for ourselves.

As Bob Marley said, when finally admitting to his friend Peter Tosh that Peter had been right from the start, when Peter had strongly stated "I don't want Peace, without Equal Rights and Justice", Bob finally admitted:

"Brother, you're right, you're right,
You're right, you're right, you're so right!
We gon' fight (we gon' fight), we'll have to fight (we gon' fight),
We gonna fight (we gon' fight), fight for our rights!

So arm in arms, with arms, we'll fight this little struggle,
'Cause that's the only way we can overcome our little trouble.

Soon we'll find out who is the real revolutionary...
So soon we'll find out who is the real revolutionaries...

And, brother, you're right, you're right,
You're right, you're right, you're so right!
We'll 'ave to fight (we gon' fight), we gonna fight (we gon' fight)
We'll 'ave to fight (we gon' fight), fighting for our rights!"

PS - To tie everything back to Cannabis again, here I am at age 11, helping my father help Jack Herer to Relegalize it:

Yes, my eye color became darkened from green to hazel due to my father having black hair and dark brown eyes.

And yet, if you look closely, and depending on seasonal or dietary or spiritual factors which I still haven't figured out the details of, sometimes my eyes become greener, as you can see for example in this photo:

Anyway, genes plus culture plus WILL. Remember that: even without 100% purity of genes or culture, we can still use our WILL to realize higher ideals and then take action to make it real. I'm planting seeds in hearts and minds, and someday soon let's all plant Cannabis seeds and Mimosa Tenuiflora seeds as well, since to start a revolution first one must emancipate oneself from mental slavery. Then, after that, one can begin to realize we can and should and will emancipate ourselves from physical slavery as well. And back to the starting point: Organic Cannabis and Pure DMT start the process of Reality Realization then Reality Creation.

Finally, folks, please simply ignore this thread if not interested, and simply read this thread if interested. If you feel compelled to fight, don't waste our time fighting. Figure out who really needs the most fixing. I'll give you a hint: it's not anyone in the poorest 99% group. It's those in the richest 1% whom you should be targeting, not me. Replies aren't really needed most of the time. If you feel truly compelled to add some positive contributions, you may, but again: I'm simply riffing here, getting lifted with spliffs, because from reality I will not drift. Basically, I'm showing what a Red-Haired Cannabis Lover thinks about, so please simply enjoy the vibe.

 

[Starfire]

Thank you for helping me understand the continuity of your thread. I support your Revolutionary spirit. I was out of line to suggest a change. Take your time with your thoughts about my vision.

 

[Observer]

Dear Honorable Starfire: you definitely were not out of line, your logical wondering/request was definitely fine, and you are definitely welcome anytime.

I spent over two hours writing my thoughts about your experience, all unfortunately deleted by either chance or jerks at Langley.

Anyway, to summarize it all concisely (which is not my usual style) I just want to say thank you for helping me realize there are actual physical beings living outside of this concave bubble who contact us using the spiritual frequency which we can access through heroic Cannabis and DMT trips.

 

[Observer]

In the first post of this thread, I gave an introduction of the DMT molecule - which your body produces nightly.
Since all information should be shared with all, today I'm going to share all I know, as if today were my last day.
Meaning, it'd be sad if the following "info-entertainment" summary were to be lost forever, so: let's keep it alive.

I don't advocate doing anything illegal, just as the "Ocean's 11" writer doesn't advocate robbing any Casino mogul.
Just as planting a Cannabis seed in Japan is illegal, yet collecting seeds is legal, the same is true of ideas: all legal.
Now, currently, in many places it's illegal to alter your way of thinking with molecules, or to even INTEND to do so.
So, before intending to exogenously supplement your endogenous DMT levels, check the laws in your country, OK?

So, if the act or intention of taking a plant and isolating one particular molecule in that plant is illegal in your area,
then definitely don't irrational choose to break any irrational law. (No, instead: rationally choose to break it, haha.)
But seriously, the following ideas are provided as entertainment, we do NOT want anyone to break any drug laws.
Like a 1920s "Warning: Alcohol is illegal, so be sure to NOT place this grape juice with sugar in a dark place" label.

Just like my idea of us voting in a law to give the poorest 99% the legal right to take back Earth from the richest 1%.
The act of Revolution to overthrow the top 1% of Earth's ruling oligarchs may be illegal, and maybe even the intention.
Fortunately, it's still legal to DREAM about Revolution: just as I can dream about bank robbery, without actual "intent".

By clicking the Spoiler Alert button, you agree to NOT use this info to break any laws: merely collect info as a collector.
By reading the following, you agree to NEVER attempt (or even intend to attempt) the isolation or imbibing of DMT.

Spoiler: Spoiler Alert and Legally-Binding Agreement: By clicking this button, you agree to NOT use this info illegally.

Someone Who Isn't Me had a dream, and in this fantasy dream, an angel passed humans the following story in written form:

Although you didn't request this, and although you probably will never use this, I'd simply like to pass this recipe to you, so that someday if you ever decide to try this lovely DeepMeditationTherapy molecule, you can. Intelligent goodhearted folks helped me learn how to isolate it 12 years ago.

Here's a trip report which I had belatedly pasted onto WildHeretic's site 7 years ago:
tinyURL.com/DeepMeditationTherapy

I had shared it 5 years before that, at this site where I had done my initial research:
Welcome to the DMT-Nexus

So, as you can see from my (thankfully archived) post at WildHeretic's site, I realized 12 years ago that this "spirit molecule" allows one to tune in to another frequency, which is why when I saw FrostyChud's "frequency tuning" post I felt compelled to share.

Alright, here are some links from the only site I respect when it comes to DMT:
wiki.DMT-Nexus.me/FAQ
wiki.DMT-Nexus.me/DMT-Nexus_Wiki:Health_and_Safety
wiki.DMT-Nexus.me/Mimosa_hostilis
wiki.DMT-Nexus.me/Q21Q21's_Vinegar/Lime_A/B_Extraction_Tek
tinyURL.com/DeepMeditationTherapySafety

Alright, here is my American "Shaman" who helped me learn deeply about it:
tinyURL.com/Antrocles-1
tinyURL.com/Antrocles-2
tinyURL.com/Antrocles-3
tinyURL.com/Antrocles-4

But remember, the rulers don't want us to do it (yet they do it themselves, for example: the huge pineal gland sculpture in front of the Vatican), so, I think they decided "No choice, some of our slaves will wake up to the fact this amazing pineal gland (seat-of-the-soul) juice, which is vital for dreaming, and thus vital for HGH reward, and thus vital for health, and vital for downloading info from the universe, probably vital for us uploading nightly to the universe all the info we personally have collected, so all we the rulers can do to prevent the slaves from benefiting from this molecule is #1 we'll reduce the slaves' ability to produce sufficient amounts endogenously by pushing wheat (and later fluoride) so that most slaves' pineal glands get calcified, and for those few slaves who realize there is a way to externally supplement themselves with this molecule consciously via plants, let's have actors give people the wrong impression that seeing demons is a normal part of a DMT trip."

And so, I say all that to say this: when reading trip reports, even at that site which I respect, the fact remains that the negative ones might be written by paid liars. That way, half of the readers will be scared away from ever trying it, and then half of the folks brave enough to try it will have their trips influenced by the demon stories which the liars seeded, and thus one gets an extra influx of honest reporters saying they too saw bad spirits.

But let's be totally honest here: it's also possible that folks with bad hearts (or should I say, "Hearts which currently need more self-cleaning and improvement") simply will see bad spirits since those bad spirits are drawn to (and probably occasionally or usually) control the bad-hearted folks. In which case: the DMT molecule is simply showing the person reality. Don't like the fact you've got demons hanging out near you? Clean your heart more! And thank goodness this reality-showing molecule showed you the fact you need to improve yourself. Have gratitude, clean your heart, then come again and see better spirits.

Also, it's possible that even goodhearted folks see demons around them. In which case, this still is a reality we want to know for ourselves. I personally want to know all of reality, the good and the bad, I don't want to hide anything from myself. So, if my heart needs cleaning I want to know it, and if even with a good heart bad spirits exist around us, I want to know that too. I'm not scared of reality. I don't want to live in a "happy" illusion. Just as I learned through Usselo there are indeed negative aspects of the past (and present) which, although I don't don't like such facts, I still like knowing more and more, since again, I want to know as much as possible about reality.

Alright, I've been typing too much, I'll simply share the recipe now and let you go. Again, I do NOT expect a reply. Please just passively file away this info somewhere safe and hidden, even in a hole under a tree or something, so that in the future, if you decide you want this info then, you'll have it.

There are many recipes, but I chose this one since it's the most simple, it doesn't require lye, and it doesn't require buying special gear.
wiki.DMT-Nexus.me/Q21Q21's_Vinegar/Lime_A/B_Extraction_Tek

So, first you need some mimosa hostilis. Hopefully your country hasn't outlawed that plant. See, in many countries, it's the "thought crime" of wanting to take this one particular molecule out of the plant which is illegal, not the plant itself. The rulers have trouble making the plant itself illegal since DMT is contained in over 10,000 plants, and all humans. So, they usually just say "The molecule in isolated form: is illegal" or "Purchasing the plant with the intention of isolating the molecule: is illegal."

So, your intention is definitely NOT to do any isolating. Your intention is simply to dye some of your white T-shirts pink, using this purple powder which the person/company sending it to you should label as "Natural Pink T-Shirt Dye" instead of loudly proclaiming mimosa hostilis, see? It's perfectly legal for you to want to buy this purple root bark, in original form or in powdered form, to mix with hot water to dye some white T-shirts pink.

OK, then, once you have legally obtained your T-shirt dye, the next steps are as mentioned: mixing one cup each of hot water, vinegar, the powder, and calcium hydroxide: in a glass bowl, with a glass spoon (because plastic is a no-no, as is any cheap metal, due to the final step involving Ligroin, which is a slightly more expensive yet slightly more pure form of Naphtha) (the spoon could be wooden, I used a wooden spoon, but I simply am recommending a glass spoon to avoid the chance of the wooden spoon having some unwanted chemical in it).

You also need some Ligroin for the final step. An official use for Ligroin is: you have some expensive clothing item, like a kimono or something, which got a little penmark on it, and you want to take the penmark off without harming the color of the fabric, and that's why you bought Ligroin.

OK, and remember this: Ligroin (and its cheaper cousin Naphtha) is extremely flammable. So, do not allow this bottle of Ligroin to ever be in the same room as a fire. If you open a Ligroin bottle anywhere near an open flame, or even a spark, a fire could and would probably start. So, when we're heating the chocolate shake, as you'll read below, do NOT have the bottle of Ligroin in the same room. Store the bottle of Ligroin tightly closed, far far away, in a room without any flames, without any sparks, without any heaters, OK?

If one opens a bottle of Ligroin (or Naphtha), this dangerous liquid emits a flammable gas which surprisingly goes down, this gas is heavier than air, so imagine this awful scenario: imagine you open the bottle in a "perfectly fine room, since there is no flame/spark/heater in this room" but then the gas goes down to the floor below you, where someone DOES have a flame/spark/heater, that could result in BOOM a fire. So, simply never open the bottle inside, OK? Only open it outside, and only in an outside area WITHOUT any flame/spark/heater nearby.

So, back to the first steps. The hot water and vinegar and powder are mixed together first, with the result being a watery red liquid. Then the calcium hydroxide (also known as pickling-lime) is added, which changes the watery red liquid to a thick brown chocolate shake. You want the consistency to really be like a chocolate shake.

The "1 cup each" ratio mentioned above usually produces the perfect chocolate shake consistency, but if needed, you can easily make adjustments now: if the chocolate shake seems too watery, just a little more pickling lime, or conversely if your chocolate shake seems too dry/thick, add just a little more water.

So, now your chocolate shake should really be the consistency of a chocolate shake. Next, if you want to make sure you grab as much as possible of the DeepMeditationTherapy molecule, you can now take your chocolate shake and heat it a little. One way to do this is to have your original glass bowl be a pyrex-glass cooking pot. Another way, if you don't have a pyrex-glass cooking pot is to temporarily pour the chocolate into some cooking pot, heat it up, and then pour it back into your glass bowl. A third way is to simply boil some hot water in a "whatever material cooking pot", and then place your "glass bowl filled with chocolate shake" to be floating on that hot water. The main point is, no matter which way you choose, at this stage you want your chocolate shake to be hot, and sitting in a glass bowl. I remember at first I didn't buy a pyrex-glass cooking pot, I simply used a glass bowl, but the boiling water I floated the glass bowl in was so hot it cracked the glass bowl, I sure was surprised to learn glass can be so weak it breaks just from floating on top of boiling water, so either buy a pyrex-glass cooking pot, or, simply don't get your glass bowl TOO hot. This "I gotta' make the chocolate shake really hot" feeling came from the recipe which I was following, but the author was probably simply overly-concerned about grabbing as much of this special molecule as possible. It's probably not so important for the chocolate shake to be hot. Probably warm is fine. Remember: each gram of mimosa hostilis contains 2% of the molecule one seeks. And merely 50mg of that molecule vaporized does the job amply (imagine a third of the size of one grain of rice, that's all you need). So, if you start out with 2.5 grams of mimosa hostilis, that's enough to end up with 50mg of the final pure molecule. So, as you can see, that "one cup of mimosa hostilis" is more than 2.5 grams, so that one cup is going to contain much more than you need of the final molecule, so what I'm saying is: don't worry too much about the "the shake needs to be hot" fear, since worrying too much about making it hot: caused me to lose a nice glass bowl, haha. Anyway, so you've got at least a warm chocolate shake sitting in a glass bowl or a pyrex glass bowl?

Great, now here comes the dangerous part. First, get out of the kitchen. Take your glass bowl with the hot/warm chocolate shake and go outside to your backyard. Now, are you absolutely sure there are ZERO flames/sparks/heaters around you? Good, now the next thing I must tell you is we want to pour a cup of this Ligroin into your chocolate shake, but we DON'T want a drop of this Ligroin to splash up into an eye, and let's remember: even a tiny drop of liquid, when poured into another liquid, can bounce up surprisingly high, so be very careful to pour the Ligroin into the hot/warm chocolate shake WITHOUT any Ligroin touching your eyes, your face, your body, your hands. DO NOT LET LIGROIN TOUCH YOUR SKIN.

Laboratory Gloves and Googles and Mask are recommended, but I simply took the cheap route of not buying any of that and simply being very very very careful. Feel free to buy those 3 safety items if you choose to.

So, being very very very careful, one gently pours a cup of Ligroin into the chocolate shake. Now, close the bottle of Ligroin tightly. OK, place the bottle a few meters from you, you don't need it anymore. Now gently stir the chocolate shake. Your goal is for the Ligroin to be slightly warmed by the hot/warm chocolate shake, and for your Ligroin to be carefully mixed in the hot/warm chocolate WITHOUT splashing it on yourself. And really one should be wearing a painter's mask at least, to reduce the amount of gas/fumes from this liquid entering your lungs. In my case, I simply was careful: I opened the bottle carefully, then did the pour carefully, then closed the bottle carefully, then stirred carefully, and all 4 of these steps were finished in about one minute, so that's not much time of gas/fume inhalation. So, that's why I feel I didn't need a mask. But again, safer is better, so please be safer than me, brother.

The Ligroin somehow magically grabs only the DeepMeditationTherapy molecule. So, now we want to transfer only the now-magic Ligroin into a flat-bottom glass bowl. We want this now-magic Ligroin liquid to be transferred to the flat-bottom glass bowl WITHOUT allowing any of the brown chocolate shake to be transferred. That's why we made it the thick consistency of a chocolate shake: so the liquid Ligroin can be poured (because it moves relatively quickly) into the flat bowl, while the chocolate shake (because it moves relatively slowly) stays in the original bowl.

While pouring the now-magic Ligroin from the original glass bowl to the flat-bottom glass-bowl, you'll probably notice the now-magic Ligroin will probably hug the bottom of the original glass bowl during the pour. Which means a little waste. So, before you begin this whole project, I suggest practicing a little in advance: simply take some water and practice pouring just water from your glass bowl to your flat-bottom bowl a few times, so you can understand the surprising path the liquid will take (the hugging the bottom and dripping from the bottom), so you won't be surprised when you do it with Ligroin.

So, now, after you have successfully poured the now-magic Ligroin from the chocolate shake bowl into the flat-bottom bowl: you have a flat-bottom glass-bowl with the now-magic Ligroin (I call it "now-magic Ligroin" since now this Ligroin contains the magic DeepTherapyMolecule), and your original bowl with the chocolate shake (which now doesn't contain the magic DeepTherapyMolecule). You can throw the chocolate shake away now, since all of the goodies have been taken out. Some people try to make sure all the goodies have been taken out, by repeating the process, but that seems dangerous to me. For just a few milligrams of additional goodness, I'm not going to reheat this chocolate shake, since it now contains a little leftover Ligroin. So in my opinion, it's best to simply throw away the chocolate shake now (by dumping it in your toilet and flushing it down into the sewer, but again, be careful about splashing, since you don't want any of this chocolate-shake-with-a-little-leftover-ligroin-mixed-in to splash up onto you.)

So, now you have this flat-bottom glass-bowl with a clear liquid inside ("now-magic Ligroin"). You want this clear liquid to evaporate. That might take a few days. You want this evaporation to happen outside, since we don't want the gas/fumes to start a fire or even be inhaled by us. So, to avoid junk in the air or leaves or bugs entering this clear liquid, you can place some pantyhose on top, since pantyhose allows the air to move in and out for evaporation, while preventing anything else from entering.

So, a few days later, that flat-bottom glass bowl should have ZERO liquid left, and the only thing remaining should be tiny white crystals/powder at the bottom, which one can scrape into a tiny pile using a razor.

That's the pure DeepMeditationTherapy molecule.

Now, here's a little remix: if you don't want to bother with this dangerous, toxic, flammable, bad vibe Ligroin: you can use "D-Limonene" instead. D-Limonene can also be called Limonene, but it is NOT the same as "Lemonene or Limonin." D-Limonene is much safer than Ligroin, since D-Limonene is basically concentrated citrus peels used for cleaning. But still, even though D-Limonene is much safer than Ligroin, D-Limonene is still slightly flammable and slightly toxic, so again, be careful. The minus of D-Limonene is your final result will not be white pure DMT, it will be pinkish due to also picking up a tiny percent (less than 5%) of extra molecules (non-toxic molecules, namely: "NMT and 2-methy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-beta-carboline") together with the DMT. So, whether you use Ligroin for pure white powder or D-Limonene for semi-pure "full spectrum" pink powder, the the result is the same: the DMT molecule will tune you into a frequency of experience more satisfying than all these words from the past which we read and regurgitate.

And remember: if going the vaporization route, really go the vaporization route. Meaning, inhaling cannabis has the option of either being vaporized or burnt with a flame, but DMT should never be burnt with a flame. It would be destroyed, and would smell bad too. So, keep the flame far enough away so the molecule isn't burnt.

And remember, you only want to vaporize a tiny amount: 50mg (which equals 0.05g, of course) (about the size of a third of one grain of rice). or, even better: start with 10mg as a micro-dose, see how you like it, then slowly increase.

Actually, this is an important point: 12 years ago when I tried this, I thought the important thing was having a "breakthrough" trip, just like many of us were convinced by McKenna we needed to take a "heroic dose" of 5 grams of mushrooms. But now, I realize that makes it seem like such a big "all or nothing" scary adventure that in the end... I haven't tuned in for 12 years. I'm now thinking this: for DMT and mushrooms, daily micro-dosing is the best way. Just a tiny amount, so that one can still function as normal yet have just a little slight tuning-in. Like that 2011 movie Limitless, but in real life.

And here's another reason why I want to start micro-dosing DMT: after each trip, even the micro-dose trips, the mere fact we supplemented a little DMT means our body then creates a little extra HGH, which I feel is essential for health. So yeah, that's my recommendation. From my mouth to my ears, as the saying goes. Meaning, I'm going to take my own advice, and enter the DMT frequency again, but this time I'm going to take tiny micro-doses instead of a heroic dose. Because my "all-or-nothing, 100% or 0%" philosophy has resulted in me choosing 0% DMT for the past 12 years. And the same applies to everything: a little of something good is better than none at all. So, I'm going to have my body reward myself with a little healthy HGH, by having just a tiny little healthy DMT.

Alright, again, for legal reasons, please don't reply with a thank you, please don't reply at all, brother. I'm just a crazy person sending you some rambling about some molecule, you did not ask for this info, you probably don't want this info. So, this is just a one-way letter, no reply needed. Have a nice day!

Official Legal Disclaimer: everything I post publicly at this site, and everything I write privately at this site, is all just fantasy role-play, I have absolutely no intention to isolate or imbibe any illegal molecules, nor any intention to inspire any such intent, nor any intention to inspire any intention of a worldwide Revolution of the poorest 99% (us) taking back the Earth from the richest 1% (them). And I'm sure the same thing is true for my fellow fantasy role-players here. Nobody intends to do any of these actions in real life. This is all simple legal fantasy role-play. Thank you for understanding.

Official Legal Disclaimer: everything I post publicly at this site, and everything I write privately at this site, is all just fantasy role-play, I have absolutely no intention to isolate or imbibe any illegal molecules, nor any intention to inspire any such intent, nor any intention to inspire any intention of a worldwide Revolution of the poorest 99% (us) taking back the Earth from the richest 1% (them). And I'm sure the same thing is true for my fellow fantasy role-players here. Nobody intends to do any of these actions in real life. This is all simple legal fantasy role-play. Thank you for understanding.

PS - For those interested in the 5 Revolutionary Posts (wisely deleted by Mod since too off-topic & too lengthy), go here:
tinyURL.com/AllFiveArchivedForPosterity

 

[alltheleaves]

Summing up responses to a few ideas...

Were humans created/bred to be slaves? Nothing is stopping anyone from working for themselves and sidestepping a majority of the energy extraction dilemma.



As for legalizing it. Legal eyes it. Asking the ×state× for per mission....

Official status of marijuana never made a difference in my choices but freer availability has probably gotten some of the more timid, cowardly and el-awe abiding glued to the couch and the Tube.