Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Dielectric
Date: 2020-01-06 19:18:12
Reaction Score: 3
So, if I'm understanding correctly, what we call "electrons" are misinterpretations of a part of this larger geometric form. When talking about a building block of reality, does that correspond to a tangible size (like bigger than an "electron", is measurable) or is that a silly question because of the nature of an all-encompassing energy field? I might also be getting tripped up over a perceived permanence in calling something a "building block."
I appreciate your efforts in this thread, even if you personally critique them now. It's a very hard thing to wrap one's mind around, especially if one has existing "scientific knowledge"/bias.
..
Add this: Maybe I should not have said building blocks. They seem like they are the buliding blocks. I also didn't think that there was anything missing. I now think I was wrong about that too.
Remember, I'm a nobody, just another self appointed flat foot, and I write about this stuff because it makes me refine what I think I understand so the questions are not silly. I started from scratch and what I say are my conclusions. I've run a thread for three years on another site.
The site is supposedly changing servers right at the moment. Point is myself and a few others have been attempting to reverse engineer the basics of anti-gravity for a while and we have some conclusions about the way it works.
www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/20737-inquiry-alien-reproduction-vehicle-1.html
So to answer the question as best I can, and remember now, these are my understandings which might not be entirely accurate.
Quantum Theory supposedly says there are higher dimensions but that at the planck scale (the smallest of all possible forms) lies the tetrahedron. That this geometric shape is the crystalline shape which fills the universe.
Planck units - Wikipedia
So the mathematical reductionists vindicate the tetrahedron as the geometric shape of the crystal which theoretically fills the Universe. You need only call up illustrations of Nazi Virl Saucers to see that this was understood a long, long, time ago.
Below is a little toy I created to test the Vee Gate magnetic thrust theory. You have to hold this on good angle and it helps to tap the steel sheet, vibrations are very important, but at times this crazy little thing will seem to propel itself in spurts, and once it a while it will seem to jet right off the end. Anyways, this does show that the tetrahedron model is a magnetic thruster; it is a #3D V gate.
Electrons/Positrons: All I'm saying is that from what I know people like Philo Farnsworth thought they were something else. Rays I'm pretty sure, and if you look up radioactive materials you're going to see they talk about radioactive rays.
See the photo of "vortex anti-vortex of positron/electrons"
Looks like the Norway Spiral huh?
Source.
Restoring Society Along Mentally Healthier Lines!
I
At the risk of boring everyone to death. Here's a thumbnail sketch of the history behind all this. However...I think we have a ways to go in understanding the missing link to ancient power.
See, even before the First World War R&D lead to the development of helium isotopes (superfluids) and then to super magnets, or so called Bitter Solenoids, along with AM/FM Radio and it's effects on crystals, and thence to Microwaves for communication and out of which came radar.
These Virl Saucers had to be experimental test saucers because they were primitive attempts to manipulate the Aether, and these attempts were obviously designed with this idea in mind that tetrahedrons had something to do with the Aether and and therefore with gravity. The evidence shows that before WWII they had a very good idea about stuff which today they are marketing as Quantum Theory. Nearly 100 years or more later mind you. So, for example, if space was some kind of liquid crystal and it's shape was a tetrahedron, then spinning space (tetrahedrons) around a sphere (Earth) might create gravity. Evidently this concept arising out of ideas about there possibly being some kind of link between magnetism and gravity which supposedly later is called gravitomagnetic gravity. It also appears that either sound or sonic vibrations were utilized and which we know today would undoubtedly be very important if this were expected to work in saucers of this design: Slightly iffy ...but evidently they did work well enough to show the way.
These early saucers probably worked to some degree because there are accounts of them working as well as crashing during wartime. However, it seems that once there was some vindication of these ideas, then the next step, although based on the previous understanding, actually bore little resemblance to these early saucer designs. Making a connection between the two was not easy to deduce and took a while because there's such a break in design between the early saucers and those that subsequently followed.
I knew that Rutherford and kapitza had worked to develop isotopes of helium and that Kapitza had shown that the Aether was some unknown and nearly undetectable medium which behaved like a superfluid and hence the R&D to develop something which could be used as a research tool to figure out how to exploit whatever this Aether really was.
Kapitza Superfluid Jet Powered Spider Galaxy Cosmology Model
Neither I nor anyone else I know of had any inkling that there were theoretical mathematical calculations which hypothesized that the smallest size particle, or whatever, would be in the shape of Tetrahedron. After I discovered that It began to fall together so that I could then see the physical connections between first generation saucers and those that followed which were quite different. The relationship is not obvious at first.
It all came down to realizing that the Aether was a dielectric medium which means it will react to magnetism, and so it was evidently conjectured by some means, probably involving some less well known aspects of magnetic flux as a dielectric medium, that if you then have some other substance, and which were also capable of being controlled magnetically, and which could be accelerated to very high speeds, then you could use that to induct the Aether. This is what seems to have the logic behind the second generation saucers. Well microwaves were such a material, so now if you're following all this, what we have are microwaves spinning inside of hat boxes, later spheres, and what spins these microwaves is a rotating magnetic field.
Now it is unclear what the results of doing all this actually are but we have to realize that the people working on this were arms and legs intelligent, and unlike myself these people must have theorized that by making the spin of microwaves controllable then the microwaves moment of force could be manipulated. This is a little like pulling yourself up by the proverbial bootstraps: That is if this is the way this works.
Logic showed that if this material called the Aether passed through matter (because something obviously was) then it must be that matter was causing it take an inwards trajectory, because how else can you explain gravity, and that when it exited that exit was random to every piece of matter. So if this were some kind of superfluid liquid crystal and it was doing this then it was also colliding with all other forms of Aether and causing an incoherent static energy like field, and since this was some kind of crystalline matrix then it was vibrating.
So now this next image is supposedly one of these second generation saucers. Now notice there is a tripod arrangement of hat boxes and a large circular wheel on the bottom of the saucer. These hat boxes contain microwaves. The circle is a large ring which houses a solenoid like electromagnet which fires off in stages going around the ring. It would have been made out of some iron transformer material and surrounded in stages by coils, so as to create a rotating magnetic field when each coil is energized, and this then is what causes the microwaves to circulate. At least this is what I think right now and I'm fairly certain it's close to how it worked. This would be a very early 2nd gen saucer but is consistent with other photo's of Nazi Saucers and the use of a hat box like container.
This image is undoubtedly of a mock up probably held up on a stick or string for photographs. Probably not very large but we cannot be sure. At least I cannot be sure. Might be an actual saucer.
Don't really want these posts merging. It makes for a long running speech.
My contention is that the missing link to ancient power comes down a corrupted physics. You can't make a UFO work using Einstein. You can make a UFO work using Wheeler. That's the bottom line. It's taken me about 12 to 15 years to sort through all this so it wasn't something I just latched on to. I never heard of Ken Wheeler until about a year and a half ago.
Like anyone I started with conventional knowledge, and I tried every avenue I could think of, however improbable, and using every conventional means known which might explain how a UFO might works. The only explanations which do exist using conventional notions are essentially founded on Einstein's ideas and simply don't work. I'm a pretty creative person but even I couldn't find a way to invent how a UFO might work using our present ideas about the way Universe works.
The only possible conclusion any rational person can reach is that Einstein's physics are flawed and corrupted. The obvious answer why had to be a result of political policy, aka national security. So I concluded that Einstein had to be wrong and it was that simple.
About the time I reached that conclusion I was introduced to the work of Ken Wheeler. What I do know is that by using Kens' ideas and knowledge I managed to produce, not theorize, but make a simple toy which demonstrated some basic principles. From that I was able to see the logic in the illustrations of the Virl Saucer designs.
The legends were true, it wasn't fantasy, the Nazi's really had created an antigravity drive. Moreover they had created a free energy device in the form of the Karl Schappeller device.
Besides which we have proofs in the form of photographs that UFO's exist and that it is certain they are not alien machines.
The Rex Heflin photos for example were processed in 2000 and shown to be positively 100% real. This an much more proves these are machines made by human beings.
The physics of Einstein had to be smoke screen. It is and what a smoke screen it's been. Almost a century later we are finally getting a glimpse of what the world should have had.
yes, to explain "relative ballshit & absolute nonsense" in a complicated way, so people wouldn't question. F.ex . The Lorentz transformation is a multiplication with 1, they absolutely needed c, the speed of light to be constant. Sagnac prooved Einstein wrong in 1912. Sagnacs calculations r used today in GPS calculations. ... but this is off topic
, ... indeed we r being mocked with "TRANSGENDER-electrons" ! To CONfuse & hide how it rEAlly works !
).
