The Nature of the Beast (Part 6) The Holiness of Sin, Consent Extraction

I am finding it very disturbing that not a single response to this touched upon your points about recent technology (from wireless forward). I checked twice. It seems to prove your point so well that I am left continuing to believe (as I have for a year now) that it's possible that I am the only human left, hoping vainly that a few real people might interact here.

I have all kinds of things to share on this specific (techno-alchemy-6x3) aspect of your multi-part expo but the demons would just yawn. Let me know if I am mistaken.

In case any suspect a bluff: One specific for-instance is that microprocessing technology hit a brick wall quite a while ago and no one seemed to notice, or care. Really the basic design never changed at all and it's just ceramics in a fancy box, but there are some good laughs to be had learning how this has proceeded without drawing attention to itself. It is, after all, just a kingdom of clay and iron - both incredibly vulnerable in spite of the fanfare.

Thank for the epic post. Hopefully I'm wrong, I'd love to contribute.
I would love to hear what you have found out! Technology just confuses me but appreciate anything that gets the brain working and giving me some where else to go/look into please share ?

I have loved this post -and admit that I got a bit confused around some aspects but a great deal of it is new or more detail on areas I have studied before. I jump from one possibility to the next depending on how the information effects me, and if enough triggers that interest I look closer into it. That’s why I love this forum so much. When I ever get frustrated by the why, how or who I come here and find another topic that opens doors. This series of posts have opened several door and thank you for your time in formulating it for us!
 
I am finding it very disturbing that not a single response to this touched upon your points about recent technology (from wireless forward). I checked twice. It seems to prove your point so well that I am left continuing to believe (as I have for a year now) that it's possible that I am the only human left, hoping vainly that a few real people might interact here.

I have all kinds of things to share on this specific (techno-alchemy-6x3) aspect of your multi-part expo but the demons would just yawn. Let me know if I am mistaken.

In case any suspect a bluff: One specific for-instance is that microprocessing technology hit a brick wall quite a while ago and no one seemed to notice, or care. Really the basic design never changed at all and it's just ceramics in a fancy box, but there are some good laughs to be had learning how this has proceeded without drawing attention to itself. It is, after all, just a kingdom of clay and iron - both incredibly vulnerable in spite of the fanfare.

Thank for the epic post. Hopefully I'm wrong, I'd love to contribute.
https://stolenhistory.net/threads/moores-law-and-the-rise-of-quantum-computing.1682/
 
I am finding it very disturbing that not a single response to this touched upon your points about recent technology (from wireless forward). I checked twice. It seems to prove your point so well that I am left continuing to believe (as I have for a year now) that it's possible that I am the only human left, hoping vainly that a few real people might interact here.

I have all kinds of things to share on this specific (techno-alchemy-6x3) aspect of your multi-part expo but the demons would just yawn. Let me know if I am mistaken.

In case any suspect a bluff: One specific for-instance is that microprocessing technology hit a brick wall quite a while ago and no one seemed to notice, or care. Really the basic design never changed at all and it's just ceramics in a fancy box, but there are some good laughs to be had learning how this has proceeded without drawing attention to itself. It is, after all, just a kingdom of clay and iron - both incredibly vulnerable in spite of the fanfare.

Thank for the epic post. Hopefully I'm wrong, I'd love to contribute.
https://stolenhistory.net/threads/moores-law-and-the-rise-of-quantum-computing.1682/
Thank you Citezenship !
 
Hearing the silent echo I feared. Proceeding to smash my 8088 computer to dust and return to the joys and woes of real physical social life in the dirt. Hope to run into some of you out there. We are the ones with unmasked faces, and thankful smiles. Walk away while you still can.
 
This has to be one of the most amazing works I have read. The research is impeccable. I would like to thank to OP for his amazing work.
 
What is the nature of the beast that lies behind all of this suffering and was it always so?
...built into the system. That is Natural. Everything else stems from Religion, Belief, and the Control of Resources.
Hi,

What if we constantly create the reality we are thinking of?

As the conciousness evolved to man with desire to experience the "Dream", humans cultivated the Beast inside them with all the pro's and con's.
But all the beautiful experiences too.

The battle of our perceptions thus creating the reality is what makes all of it true. The art, love and maybe even the archons? Stolen history and the reality?
Ley lines and control mechanicms and so on was desired by some agenda. By evolution of reality we could call it.
It all twists togheter like rastas.

When we discovered the inner mechanism of energies and the fields, we opened a door to present day quantum ideas and workings.
And this is with everything. If we learn something, we open our perception to create more out of less. Dancing for example. Or engineering etc.
Like a baby learning to walk, during lifetime learns a lot, to end up lying in the grave. Haha

Greetings, and thank you for great post Onijubei.
 
Hi,

What if we constantly create the reality we are thinking of?

As the conciousness evolved to man with desire to experience the "Dream", humans cultivated the Beast inside them with all the pro's and con's.
But all the beautiful experiences too.

The battle of our perceptions thus creating the reality is what makes all of it true. The art, love and maybe even the archons? Stolen history and the reality?
Ley lines and control mechanicms and so on was desired by some agenda. By evolution of reality we could call it.
It all twists togheter like rastas.

When we discovered the inner mechanism of energies and the fields, we opened a door to present day quantum ideas and workings.
And this is with everything. If we learn something, we open our perception to create more out of less. Dancing for example. Or engineering etc.
Like a baby learning to walk, during lifetime learns a lot, to end up lying in the grave. Haha

Greetings, and thank you for great post Onijubei.
That is called magic.. Or the minds eye over the pyramid.. Manifestation of what we imagine or believe into physical existence...
 
And thus... There has always been suffering. It is built into the system. That is Natural. Everything else stems from Religion, Belief, and the Control of Resources. All the other so called apparitions, and denizens, and archons, .... just stuff people make up or hold onto as some sort of Reason for Suffering or reason for the way people act or perceive.

Personally, I don't understand how the system you refer to can be "Natural." It is absolutely unnatural imo. It's precisely the concept of suffering as something natural that "stems from Religion, Belief, and the Control of Resources" and are "just stuff people make up or hold onto as some sort of Reason for Suffering or reason for the way people act or perceive." As for "the other so called apparitions, and denizens, and archons" that's all covered in depth in the remaining 5 parts of this series, so dismissing it after part 1 is absolutely your prerogative, ,but others may have a different opinion if they make the effort to read the remaining 5 parts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the first jewish male genes know so far come together in the sopot or sopot/lengyel culture 5000bc [j2a, e1b].

this is an upside down image of the Kaaba.its to act as a guide to mankind to direct us to paradise. Damascus gate in Jerusalem is the same.

the point where the two lines cross is here

View attachment 10703
right in the middle of sopot territory.

what else is there? should be 4 great rivers coming together and one exiting east. should be a huge circular city with canals [kikkar of Jehovah or Zion], a rectangular garden enclosure and a great flood.

Zion info.

when the romans discovered these structures, they took mithra as their god as the Persian story fits best.

peace
Another way to look at the 4 rivers is symbolism for the 4 Cardinal points...
 
Another way to look at the 4 rivers is symbolism for the 4 Cardinal points...
or there could be 4 rivers and one exiting... nothing symbolic at all. simple direct... science likes it that way...

1014307_10151691383085406_15987224_n.jpg

there should be 4 columns that hold up the sky too. thanks for the memory jolt. on Trajans column you can see his discovery of them in their enclosures. you can also see him discovering mithras enclosure.

there were initially 3 cardinal points for the threefold division of the earth.
 
Personally, I don't understand how the system you refer to can be "Natural." It is absolutely unnatural imo. It's precisely the concept of suffering as something natural that "stems from Religion, Belief, and the Control of Resources" and are "just stuff people make up or hold onto as some sort of Reason for Suffering or reason for the way people act or perceive." As for "the other so called apparitions, and denizens, and archons" that's all covered in depth in the remaining 5 parts of this series, so dismissing it after part 1 is absolutely your prerogative, ,but others may have a different opinion if they make the effort to read the remaining 5 parts

.natural? Do we not drink the water the earth provides? Do we not eat the food the earth provides? Do we not use the herbs for remedies and the spices for dishes? Do we not breathe the air and use it for cellular respiration? The OP concluded man was the beast which was apart of my remark. Suffering is natural because we have different seasons when food doesn't grow.. When beasts are not plentiful or livestock hasn't grown to capacity. We suffer for lack of food or warmth. We have people we care about.. Die. We have injury and sickness. Suffering is apart of the system. It's built in. Outside of that, all other suffering appears from belief. I'm ugly or I'm fat or I don't make enough money or Jesus doesn't love me... The Spiritual denizens don't cause suffering unless your magic rituals are not done properly or you are taking too many mind altering drugs. It's very rare for the denizens to interact and cause suffering. I'm not saying it doesn't happen at all . But it doesn't happen for the vast majority of people. Hope that clarifies my earlier response.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the physical realm, their are physical limitations which imparts that "suffering" is implied within the system itself. Breaking a bone or losing a loved one will bring about suffering. All non natural suffering appears to only come from "belief" systems. And the majority of these "belief" systems are Religious.

Suffering is natural because we have different seasons when food doesn't grow.. When beasts are not plentiful or livestock hasn't grown to capacity. We suffer for lack of food or warmth. We have people we care about.. Die. We have injury and sickness. Suffering is apart of the system.

Breaking physical limitations within the physical environment simply implies that the environment has limitations and therefore what you are attempting is unnatural, not that you are within the environment to suffer.

Expecting to grow food in an area which has seasons when this is not possible means that you are not living in harmony with the environment, but rather attempting to impose your will upon it. This is an unnatural situation and does not signify that you are here to suffer. Animals, flora and fauna, live in harmony with the environment, they don’t try to impose their will upon it, they either adapt or move on.

If your “beasts” and livestock don’t flourish to your satisfaction then your exploitation of these animals again amounts to the unsuccessful imposition of your will upon nature. As far as any ‘system’ rules are concerned you are behaving unnaturally and any suffering you experience is equal to that which you have caused to your “beasts”. Of course humans are not crops to be harvested or livestock to be exploited, although I’m sure we are all familiar with the ‘goyim’ moniker. In the instance of human exploitation or harvesting, consent has to be obtained from the sufferers, this bypasses the ‘system rules’ and suffering becomes a matter of personal choice or rather free-will.

There are many societies who do not view death as a cause for suffering, loss and misery. To do so is a product of conditioning and fear of the unknown, which is a control mechanism devised by humans, not a part of the ‘system’.

The majority of “unnatural suffering” is caused by humans deliberately inflicting it upon other humans. ‘Religions’ and beliefs are an incitement for this behaviour, most having been founded upon non-physical, unnatural intervention into the physical realm.

The OP concluded man was the beast which was apart of my remark.

This conclusion is not made in the OP of the thread in which you are posting. It is made at the end of the 6th and final part of this series, which is a totally different thread and you have presented it entirely out of context. Whether deliberately or otherwise, your comments, (or rather Spoilers,) are acting like those of a Gatekeeper attempting to dissuade readers from continuing with the remaining five parts of the series.

The Spiritual denizens don't cause suffering unless your magic rituals are not done properly or you are taking too many mind altering drugs. It's very rare for the denizens to interact and cause suffering.

How curious. That’s exactly the opposite conclusion from the evidence presented in the remaining five parts of this series - the other five parts that you have preempted with your pronouncements in part one.

You seem to be very keen to let everyone know that you are an expert on ritual magic. Would that be based upon the Kabbalah (or however you choose to spell it) by any chance? Coincidentally, or not, the Kabbalah is discussed in the same part 6 of this series where it is shown to have spawned the Sabbatean-Frankist movement, which is still causing suffering on a grand scale today.

Of course, if you have made a genuine mistake and posted these comments of yours in the wrong thread, then that’s easily rectified.
 
I allways tell people that our Ego program is the cause and therefore effect (loop) of our suffering (or blossoming) and the way of life and understanding.

Ego equals defense/offense mechanism where the Beast attaches itself in countless ways and hides behind it.
As it is, this could be the injected part of personality.

Funny thing is it makes life so much easier as it makes it harder (to "see") cos it's (ego mechanismh) in every aspect of life journey and takes some will not to fall into the same track by temptations.
The Beast knows most humanity better than most of them are capable to understand.

Throught observing the world I have come to the same conclusions, most important point being we call it (the Beast) upon ourselves by not understanding how it works (temptation, trickery etc). Or we can avoid it as some of us can "see" the mechanism and how it stems from our animal instincts, wishes and dreams to thrive.

Supreme work by Felix.
 
Selective Mudfloods?

We will probably never know the extent to which the Archons cooperated with their human conspirators to produce physical manifestations such as the 1909 invasion of Britain by phantom German airships and the fairly recent promotion of the alien agenda. Also, if you’re into that kind of thing, could it be that they made possible selective mudfloods and other anomalous catastrophic events of the past?

This ^ is how I perceive our current reality. No, the reality of all human experience.

Please pardon the following over-simplification of the Sophia-Demiurge dichotomy, which places organic life as the original design of the world. Like Pandora and Eve, Sophia wanted to see what else could "be" -- and opened up a can of worms and whoop-ass. The result was a "dead" -- aka inorganic -- form which we call digital or numerical, as opposed to the analog. Which means what? variable, random, unable to be quantified. Obviously, I don't know.

I will now further disrupt the flow of thought by dragging in the Anunnaki, who presumably invented Homo ignoranus as a slave species. Before their dna manipulation, humans were ........dumb animals? mmm, I don't think so. Who knows? Perhaps a true human be-ing who lived in harmony with Sophia/Gaia. Female shamans supposedly communed with the Earth Mother in this golden age. And then the Demiurge found favorable candidates in the Anunnaki and their slaves -- Abraham, Mohammed, the creepy dudes Felix talks about on this page.

This is when Yahweh (an Anunnaki or Archon) handed down male kingship and wars and all the trappings of civilization.

If anyone reads this analysis, please don't assume that I will defend this position tomorrow. I used to think wrong stuff and am always ready to stand corrected.
Not long ago, I "believed" that suffering was our destiny and karma was our goal.
Even though that stupid mind control militated against my natural analog instincts.
By the way, I have heard voices before. Yes, Exorcist stuff. My husband told me he had also heard a disembodied voice. I made it stop and leave my family alone. Free will. I will guess that everyone has had such an experience and may not remember it.
 
Like Pandora and Eve, Sophia wanted to see what else could "be" -- and opened up a can of worms and whoop-ass. The result was a "dead" -- aka inorganic -- form which we call digital or numerical, as opposed to the analog.

This is duality. The nature of the reality that Sophia dreamed into existence or however you wish to envision it, is precisely that. To know the "analogue" you have also to know the "digital", to know the Earth is flat you also have to know it's not a globe ...or vice versa depending on your point of view. The Archons are the counterpoint to Sophia, the Sophia principle is not immune from duality.
 
This is duality. The nature of the reality that Sophia dreamed into existence or however you wish to envision it, is precisely that. To know the "analogue" you have also to know the "digital", to know the Earth is flat you also have to know it's not a globe ...or vice versa depending on your point of view. The Archons are the counterpoint to Sophia, the Sophia principle is not immune from duality.
yes, well, this-that, yin-yang.
Up to a point.
In the real world, however, we often run into complex randomness beyond simplistic opposites.

Suffering and consent, for example.
What did Sophia have in mind for us inhabitants of Gaia? An easy life, food at one's fingertips, no laundry to do, not a care in the world? No physical pain?

Consent is even trickier.
Example: child abuse. There are many forms of it, ranging from benign neglect to the horrors that have recently come to light.
If a guileless kid is coached by the media and evil people into becoming a bad person, was there one particular moment when an Archon said, "Aha! I will take that decision as your relinquishing your free will to my authority"?

The die is cast. A deal with the devil is a legal imperative.
Unless the demon is cast out and redemption is gained. Free will returns.
From good to bad to good again. Saint to sinner to ...... what?

Duality, it seems to me, is a broad brush stroke in which many single paint stripes blur into a superficial oneness. A oneness with two sides.
My zodiac sign, Pisces, is a pair of fish that swim left-right at the same time. I get that, but sometimes I swim up, down, sideways. Or else I just sit in one spot, confused. Like now.
 
Too bad the thread has dwindled down.
I was listening to RichieFrom Boston yesterday. He is up-to-date on all the hoaxes our Control System foists on us. But then he always babbles about his faith in Yehushuah or whatever is the new name for the God/Jesus of the Bible. He's probably Roman Catholic. I don't get it. One of the biggest psyops of all time and he still falls for it.

The Aether II video, which may have been embedded on another thread in this series, corroborates the OP's contention that the Archons parasitize humanity.
The essayist, Marcia Ramalho, further declares that the parasites brought about world wars, floods, earrhquakes, DEW comets, and other cataclysms such as the destruction of Atlantis.

Even if she is wrong about their primary role as agents of resets, we are still stuck in the grip of the Archons. As for consent or ignorance making us victims deserving of suffering - - - - tell that to children who are abused and killed by evil forces. The Covid plandemic -- is that a slow motion depopulation agenda that anyone deserves?

Suffering, then, is another bs groupthink instituted by religion. And some philosophies. Karma? Krapma.
And when will the Devas step in, like the mother goddess Ewya in the Avatar movie?
Good angels seem to let the bad angels torture the hell out of humans. And the physical world. How do gnostics explain this? Gaia (Ewya) created the earth and then let her vicious brat corrupt it?
to test our mettle?
I can see adults being judged for that "enlightenment" goal.
But children? getting injected with nanoparticles and graphene?
Partial birth abortions? Sex trafficking?

no no no. I never took to religion, even in my Little Ladies Sunday School classes. I am more inclined to lean gnostic, and to a simulated reality.
And devas. I think they exist. But dayum, when are they going to join forces and pick up the slack?

As long as "woke" truthers like RichieFromBoston and Christian Karens let themselves (and us) be jacked around by the Archons, we will always be up Shitt Creek without a paddle ;(
_ end rant _
 
Congratulations on getting to the end. It's a shame you missed some of the points though.
 
Congratulations on getting to the end. It's a shame you missed some of the points though.
Dependable you. When you have no constructive criticism to improve someone's weaknesses, you always manage to thrust a snarky stab.

I re-read some of OP's main points several times. Esoterica is not easy for me to follow, even if I accept the writer's premise. Actually, I was comparing the gnostic overview with a second writer, the essayist of Aerher II.

I would ask you to clarify my shameful errors, but why invite more suffering on my part?
I'm sure that, in your eyes, I also use that word incorrectly.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top