The Secret War Against Germania and its Historical Roots (part 5)

They don't lack discipline and image-management skills. And has been proven on this thread and elsewhere, they'll take down entire cities, divisions, and empires.

I often wonder if the real gold these people hold is not gold itself but the truth about what we're left with and how this thing began.
 
Germany is always touted as the "Evil Empire" but lets talk body counts: The British Empire enslaved and killed millions - (100 million starved in India by Winnie Churchill, China enslaved by The British - with opium wars, the number of white slaves killed to clear every single tree from the Atlantic Ocean - to the Ohio river - dwarfs the small number of African slaves brought to the new world)!

So it's not hard to see who "The Evil Empire" really is, Germany pales by comparison.
 
There is no doubt that continuous trauma has been perpetrated against all people everywhere. My mom was traumatized by the great depression, perpetrated against the American middle class and small farmers. See The Fruits Of Graft: Great Depressions Then And Now. My generation lived under constant threat of nuclear winter. Nowadays, these poor kids! Everyone is a disease carrier!

No doubt, the Germans and Chinese and Slavs and ordinary Jews and Vietnamese and... who have been bombed literally have been traumatized the most. Good grief. No wonder we have docile populations.
 
Last edited:
Germany is always touted as the "Evil Empire" but lets talk body counts: The British Empire enslaved and killed millions - (100 million starved in India by Winnie Churchill, China enslaved by The British - with opium wars, the number of white slaves killed to clear every single tree from the Atlantic Ocean - to the Ohio river - dwarfs the small number of African slaves brought to the new world)!

So it's not hard to see who "The Evil Empire" really is, Germany pales by comparison.

I guess you're referring to the Bengal famine, which was caused largely by local Indian land owners and rich stockpiling food. If you're going to say Britain is guilty of genocide because of famines then frankly it's Russia that is the biggest evil, yet I'm sure you worship Russia as most anti-British types do.

As for the slave trade, many European countries were involved in that and the biggest number of slaves in the Americas went to Brazil, yet again no one ever says anything about this. It's always Britain that is the dumpster for every malcontent. I would contest the title of this thread actually, if there's an agenda against anyone in this modern era it is against the native English people who are usually portrayed as absolute genocidal scum deserving of being wiped out.

All you ever hear about in regards to WW2 these days is how terrible the bombings of Dresden and Hamburg were, totally ignoring the firebombing and total destruction of places like Coventry and many parts of London. Yet the Germans are portrayed as the victims, no one gives a shit about the English.

I'm not particularly defending the British Empire, which I believe was essentially an elite proto-NWO construction, but I find it very irritating when people talk as if Britain and the English people are some sort of unique evil in the world.

Just look at how Britain, particularly ENGLAND, has been flooded with mass immigration since the end of WW2 and how boat loads of so called "migrants" are being sent across the Channel by France, escorting by the French navy right at the moment and this has been going on for months, all through the lock down. How can anyone say the English won the war, or are in control of anything when our nation and race is being wilfully destroyed like this?
 
Last edited:
I find it very irritating when people talk as if Britain and the English people are some sort of unique evil in the world.

As do I and it's happening a lot here in this forum lately to the point of getting personal. The English Revolution was one of the first and at that time 'Albion' was lost. The British people became cattle to be exploited and abused, cannon fodder, pawns in an evil game. Blaming us is the easy way out and shows a total lack of understanding.

Everything British comes from German, so British colonialism spread German DNA.

So, perhaps everything that's bad in the British comes from German then?

Surely by now, if we've learned nothing else from stolen history, it must be crystal clear that nationalism is a weapon of divide and rule. What's the point of using that same weapon against each other? There's a lot I'm ashamed of in the history of my country, but I'm not responsible for it. By the same token, I'm not in the least ashamed to be a true-born Englishman - that's who I am, not what I am.

The same psy-op technique has been used against the Spanish ever since Franco died and the socialists took control. Here it's called the 'Legenda Negra' - the Black Legend - whereby all Spaniards are supposed to feel ashamed and personally responsible for the conquest of The Americas, slavery, Franco's regime, etc., etc. It's relentless. Right now the inhabitants of the Canary Islands are literally taking to the streets in their thousands to remove the vast quantity of illegal Moroccan immigrants who have been shipped direct from prisons into 4 star hotels on the islands. This Moroccan invasion is an arrangement 'Perro' Sanchez has made with the President of Morocco and Sanchez has also ordered the local police to take no action even when sexual abuse, vicious attacks and vandalism occur. So, now the people are taking matters into their own hands.

This same scenario has been happening in the British Isles for decades, but by now the native British people are so divided, so conflicted regarding their culture and completely brainwashed there's no resistance. And that's was precisely the plan. It's hasn't just happened there either, but everywhere in varying degrees.

We all have to loose or give up our sense of who we are so we can be moulded into something else - cattle for exploitation. So sniping at someone or a group of someones for causing a trauma that happened 800 years ago really isn't helping at all.
 
So, perhaps everything that's bad in the British comes from German then?

Tolkien was very proud of the germanic heritage of Britain, and with germanic, this includes not only modern day Germany, but everything Nordic. At the same time, he despised Hitler and what the 20th Century made out of Germany. According to historians, the British came from Germanic tribes. So it's more precise to speak about Britain as having the same roots as Germany. The fact that the work of Tolkien manifested in Britan and not in Germany probably implies that the german nation was already too corrupted to allow such material to surface. The nordic spirit lives on in many countries, in Germany not so much.
 
According to historians, the British came from Germanic tribes. So it's more precise to speak about Britain as having the same roots as Germany.

This mainstream view is unsupported by DNA studies:

https://mathildasanthropologyblog.w...genetic-link-between-the-british-and-basques/https://owlcation.com/stem/Irish-Blood-Genetic-Identityhttps://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/05/science/05cnd-brits.html
Of course, its possible to find other studies with different agendas.
 
According to historians, the British came from Germanic tribes. So it's more precise to speak about Britain as having the same roots as Germany.

This mainstream view is unsupported by DNA studies:

https://mathildasanthropologyblog.w...genetic-link-between-the-british-and-basques/https://owlcation.com/stem/Irish-Blood-Genetic-Identityhttps://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/05/science/05cnd-brits.html
Of course, its possible to find other studies with different agendas.

What about the connection to the Anglo-Saxon tribes and the waves of refugees from Germany during for example the times of the Thirty-Years War?
 
What about the connection to the Anglo-Saxon tribes and the waves of refugees from Germany during for example the times of the Thirty-Years War?

Clearly if the DNA studies are correct, then the impact of the Angles and the Saxons on British DNA was insignificant. If they did actually ever go to the British Isles then they were the ruling class who didn’t mix with the native scum.

The massive influence of the House of Hanover/Saxe-Coberg-Gotha/Windsor is most definitely something for which we have Germany to thank. That began in 1741 with George I following The Glorious Revolution when England was lost forever to the Kabal who put William of Orange on the English throne. This is the same Kabal who had previously financed Cromwell in the English Revolution:

Source: “Pawns in the Game”, William Guy Carr:
“Manasseh Ben Israel, and other German and French moneylenders financed Cromwell.”

Regarding the Thirty Years War, this is the first time I have heard of “waves of refugees from Germany” settling in England. Perhaps you have some references? You yourself stated in part three of this series that:

The official picture of the Thirty Year's War stands on shaky legs, even mainstream research has now come to the point of questioning the old sources. There are no credible original sources on the subject:

The Thirty Years War is pure chaos in terms of being a historical event. It has all the ingredients of being a ‘Revolution’ of the same nature of the one that was taking place in England at around the same period. Now it carries the same smokescreen of religious division and conflict, territorial disputes, x millions of deaths, plague, famine, inhumanity, blah, blah, blah, just like as all the other hidden agendas throughout “history.”

It was neither inevitable, nor the result of irreconcilable religious antagonism. Rather, it stemmed from a coincidence of tension within the Empire with a political and dynastic crisis within the Habsburg monarchy that undermined confidence in the emperor's ability to resolve long-standing constitutional problems.” Source

No such thing as coincidence, it was an agenda being put into play by the Kabal who’s goal was control. England had it’s own special version of the agenda, which is why it was hardly involved in the Thirty Years War at all.

Take a look at this from the Hanseatic League thread:

Plissken:

I read this article last night on Warlord Bankers. It traces the criminal el-ite banksters and corporations from the earliest times to their modern central banks, which control the money for every country in the world except Iran, North Korea, and Cuba. From the article:

...when modern banking practices became wide-spread, the Italian Warlord Banking Families became prominent again, especially between 1527 and 1572 when Italy produced these banking family groups: the Grimaldi, Spinola, Pallavicino, Doria, Pinelli and Lomellini.

In Germany, we find many Italian banking families migrating to Hamburg and becoming the hidden money behind the Hanseatic League .. These early unions of rich bankers investing in trade became the basis for what would become corporations like the Dutch and British East India companies. In southern Germany, two great banking families emerged in the 15th Century, the Fuggers and the Welsers. They basically came to control much of the European economy and dominated international high finance in the 16th Century [FN: greedy fuggers.] The Fugger Bank lasted from 1486 to 1647.

Also important to the Northern German city states establishing powerful banks was the influence of Dutch bankers. Berenberg Bank is the oldest bank in Germany and the world’s second oldest bank, established in 1590 by Dutch brothers Hans and Paul Berenberg in Hamburg. The bank is still owned by the Berenberg Warlord Banking Family. Throughout the 17th Century, precious metals from the New World, Japan and other locales were being channeled into the Bank of Amsterdam. The Netherlands attracted coin and bullion to be deposited in their banks until they became a leading force of banking. The concepts of fractional-reserve banking and payment systems were developed and spread to England and elsewhere from Holland.

The dutch banks eventually set up the Dutch East and The Dutch West trading companies because of the success of the Hanseatic league. Later in the article, the writer makes this point:

The actual first Warlord Corporation would be the Dutch East India Company which became the largest slave-trader in the world and started countless conflicts and wars to feed their coffers. At its height, the “Company” was more powerful than the nation that created it and remained so for hundreds of years. It is still active today in many subtle, and sometimes invisible ways. Corporate imperialism, industrial espionage, and the machinations of the military industrial complex all find their roots in the Dutch East India Company that competed with and defeated the Hanseatic League of Northern Germany.

The Thirty Years War saw the end of the original Hanseatic League. For confirmation of this, see who was minting the coins during this period:

I'm gonna toss in these images, which I captured from Martin Liedtke.

These coins of Hamburg are most interesting and telling. The magnificence of the cities represented, wow-- hat-tip to @dreamtime-- though I still don't buy the German race-qua DNA distinct entity. But note, more importantly, the Hebrew lettering on them, the nautical imagery, and the obsession with Egypt.

Who were they really? Indeed.

Screen Shot 2020-12-02 at 12.44.32 AM.jpg

Screen Shot 2020-12-02 at 12.41.38 AM.jpg

Screen Shot 2020-12-02 at 12.40.20 AM.jpg

Screen Shot 2020-12-02 at 12.42.05 AM.jpg


These coins show the Kabal quite clearly presenting themselves as Jewish (although that’s misleading as they wear many hats.)

Although the majority of Germany suffered from famine and economic ruin, there were regions that came out of the war relatively unscathed. Some city states, including Leipzig, Hamburg and Danzig, actually profited from the war.” Source

You can clearly see ‘Hamburg’ on the coin in the first image above.

The fact that the House of Hanover/Saxe-Coberg-Gotha/Windsor are so tightly wrapped up in all of this is evident from the partnership between Queen Victoria and The East India Company (Rothschilds) and their combined empire building through slavery and extreme violence. Never mind all the TV series and the films, Victoria was a megalomaniac…

Victoria_and_Albert_Museum_courtyard_frieze_detail.jpg
The Courtyard Frieze in the Victoria and Albert Museum

The Kabal are not from one particular religion, nor from one particular race. These are purely costumes they wear to suit whatever role they are playing at the time.

The Thirty Years War was, in my opinion (and it is just an opinion,) the destruction and domination of what you call Germania by the Kabal.

It’s also just my opinion that there has been an attempt to convince the native British people that they are descended from Germans because of the undeniable fact that the House of Hanover is German and is still German whatever they choose to call themselves. This fact became so uncomfortable and inconvenient during the WWI agenda that they changed their name to Windsor.
 
hese coins show the Kabal quite clearly presenting themselves as Jewish (although that’s misleading as they wear many hats.)

Fascinating. I take it (being slow but following along at home) that Kabal (cabal) = Kabalist = Sabbatean = Archons ?
 
Last edited:
Fascinating. I take it (being slow but following along at home) that Kabal (cabal) = Kabalist = Sabbatean = Archons ?

There's nothing slow about you my friend. I like the way your mind works (y)

I have a post brewing regarding the Kabbalah/Kabal, maybe the Nature of the Beast Part 7... ?
 
All you ever hear about in regards to WW2 these days is how terrible the bombings of Dresden and Hamburg were, totally ignoring the firebombing and total destruction of places like Coventry and many parts of London. Yet the Germans are portrayed as the victims, no one gives a shit about the English.


I certainly do not not give "a shit about the English." Right now, I'm hopeful they can pull off the Brexit and stand up to the Kabal. As I implied, the victims of the terror can be found nearly everywhere. What makes Germany so interesting is that it has been targeted as the "greatest evil"-- of course, nonsensical-- but more importantly very telling in terms of how the Kabal maneuvers ordinary people into impossible, neutralizing, and ultimately neurotic conditions.

My maternal side is Norwegian. Once upon a time, they were the terrors of Europe. Wouldn't know it if you knew my cousins. Crafty, yes. But violent marauders, no. Evidence suggests they were under the control of the Kabal way back when. How about Norway nowadays?
 
Last edited:
The English and the British are not the same thing. British predates the name English or so it seems to me. The kabal as Felix calls it, buried British under a flood of English. Now the establishment, a front term for the Kabal if ever there was one is labelled the British establishment in yet another layer of obfuscation. Certainly books from the 1600's through the 1700's and into the early 1800's from anywhere but the British Isles talk of 'the English and England not of the British and Britain.

Voting will never derail the kabals activities for the simple reason its governments organises, runs, controls the voting system. Brexit may reveal a discord within the Kabal but it is worth noting that the Kabal has to create and control both 'sides' in everything it does. It is and has been its modus operandi since its creation.
England is the only country within the Union of The United Kingdom that has no Parliamentary mechanism. There is no such thing as a British Parliament either and all Acts that come out of the Parliament of the United Kingdom have to gain Royal Assent from whatever Monarch we are told is ruling the United Kingdom for them to be enacted into United Kingdom Law.
 
Well, let's see what happens here in the States. People are shedding their pessimism or learned cynicism. You might be right, of course, but people are fighting for their votes, knowing they equal their lives. Miles W. Mathis holds the same position as @kd-755-- claiming that Trump is a false choice, the support of which only leads everyone into the holding tank of the Right Wing. Dismal.

I also bet that everyone has some history of unknowns under their current national appellations. When, for example, did "the Germans" or "Die Deutschen" become that name, that people? Heck, even that DNA? National revolutions are always imaginary. But they do throw a brick into the machinations of the Kabal-- at the very least-- when they become real in the consciousness of people. A good bombing, of course, can knock that idea out of their skulls, and push them straight into, for example, the EU. Trump and his people are working to reignite an imagined identity around the ideal of the Constitution, which Kabalist Obama called a simple piece of parchment.

What can the British rally around? The very idea of pre-English Britain or pre-English Wales? I suspect so. (Explaining, of course, why local languages are suppressed via compulsory schooling.) I'm all for it. I remain suspicious of claims to national identity based on DNA-- mostly due to scientific reasons. The simplest: Where does German DNA begin and/or end on a map? It seems to me this kind of consciousness has been used by the Kabal, in the case of Germany, to run it straight into the ground. After all, wasn't it the rallying cry of the Nazis to rescue Germans from this place (say, Poland) and that place (say, Bohemia) that got the whole country to buy into their own destruction?
 
Last edited:
Greetings, I’ve thoroughly enjoyed this series!
I take it ... that Kabal (cabal) = Kabalist = Sabbatean = Archons ?
Think this does a good job splitting hairs (I apologize for using this source again, but it’s pertinent); for what it’s worth:
The word “cabal” means “a conspiracy or private intrigue.” It entered English in the early 1600s, from the French cabale, itself derived from the late-medieval Latin cabala, meaning a secret tradition, usually specif- ically referring to the Jewish mystical tradition normally transliterated kabbalah. Additional translations include qabala, kaballah, qabbalah, kabala, cabbala, gabbala, etc.) This word simply means “tradition” in Talmudic Hebrew, and originally referred to all of the Torah except the Pentateuch. It stems from the root qbl, “to receive,” since the Torah was received from God. However, beginning in the early 13th century A.D., the mystical Jewish schools of the Languedoc and northern Spain used “kabbalah” to mean a specific system of thought devoted to determining the underlying, hidden form and workings of the divine creation. It is this meaning that entered Latin, then French, and then English, with its overtones of secret knowledge (and with
Christian anti-Semitic paranoia) informing the sense of the word.
Through its Hermetic scholarship, the Cabal has adopted many kabbalistic terms and profited from many kabbalistic discoveries and theories. The kabbalists and their later intellectual heirs were and are not necessarily members of the Cabal, but the Cabal has profited from the confusion and often used Jewish mystics as scape- goats for its own unsavory doings. The Cabal, of course, claims that the Hebrew word kabbalah itself derives from the Cabal, the true “receivers” of the “tradition” of ancient wisdom. They take their name from the ancient Egyptian word khab meaning “to bow before” – the Cabal was the original group of those who bowed before Khaibitu-na-Khonsu. Be that as it may, the Cabal has gone under many names since the beginning.
In GURPS Cabal, the term “Cabalist” refers to members or doctrines of the Cabal; “kabbalist” refers to practitioners of Jewish mysticism. The default assump- tion in Cabal is that successful, magically capable, kab- balists (like any other successful magic-users) are actually using Hermetic magic with variant terminology and abstruse justifications to paper over the divergences between “orthodox” kabbalah and Hermetic truth. (For fitting kabbalistic magic per se into a Cabal campaign alongside Hermetic magic, see p. 77.)
From GURPS CABAL, by Kenneth Hite
 
Great post, as usual! I slightly disagree, though, based solely on my opinion, when you refer to the forces commanding the nazis having worked only to create such chaos and then giving up to ensure their own loss. I am very hopeful that they were really trying their best for their people. Wouldn't it be so far fetched to believe that it was all a huge play?

This came up as criticism before. Maybe I should go deeper into that topic, as I have some hints showing that it was pre-planned.
Yes, agreed! Judge a tree by the fruit it bears. With Hitler, the German people came to enjoy great prosperity, followed by suffering great misery in the post war. There are many examples of Hitler's genius strategy suddenly absent in very pivotal moments that then tended to create havoc for Germany. As a direct result, Germany became ripe for the slaughter, and yet she hangs on still.

Understanding the true behind the scenes of the rise and fall of the Third Reich will do much positive work to heal us as a people, not just in Germany, but around the world, where everyone feels the tension building. We struggle to free ourselves of the tentacles that this artificial control system of debt slavery has entangled us in.

This series brings new light and focus to the situation.

The scamdemic gives us a unique opportunity to unite with the understanding that we have been massively deceived and marginalized, just as the Germans were scammed into a collective guilt consciousness based on war lies and toxic post-war reeducation propaganda. The parallels are so completely similar, yet we have the distinct advantage of now knowing their playbook, blow by blow, which is refreshingly game changing.
 
@Collapseinrealtime your username hits my peripherals like an anagram for COINTELPRO ? (sorry, I couldn’t resist), but your point is well taken. The real grand master doesn’t flub their gambit at ‘pivotal moments,’ as you say. Controlled opposition on the other hand does, well, exactly that.
Judge a tree by the fruit it bears.
Indeed!
 
Excerpt from the book "The Myth of German Villainy":

So I have taken it upon myself to read this book. I have never been so compelled to keep reading a book that has actually made me nauseous as this book does when I read through Chapter 5 on the Red Terror. The acts of rage-induced horrific depravity by the (((bolsheviks))) towards ethnic Russians and other eastern Europeans makes anything I have ever read or seen about depictions of the holocaust seem like a comical circus act in comparison. This is the first time I've had to actually stop reading any book for a time to regain my sanity.
Have you ever get read eaters of children by Johnny Cirruci? It might be your second
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top