No one on here so far has mentioned Greg Hallett's "Hitler was a British Agent". Hallett is some kind of independent spy from New Zealand. The picture he paints of the world of espionage is interesting. I always imagined spies as being tightly controlled employees of intelligence agencies, but apparently this is too simplistic. Spies apparently also come in the "swashbuckling independent contractor" variety, playing all sides against each other and ultimately only working for themselves. Information is currency in this world and so spies have an interest in both acquiring as much intelligence as possible and disseminating as much counter-intelligence as possible. Information can both save your life and get you killed. The psychological profile of the spy as he presents it is an amoral, risk-taking, alcoholic adventurer who is in the game for the thrill of secret knowledge, easy money, violence, sex, and danger. His sources for the Hitler book are a network of other such professional spies who would get together to swap stories and piece together what really happened while also maybe trying to fool each other. So in other words, you can either believe it...or not. Most of what he says can be neither verified nor falsified. Of course, when you think about it, considering how much noise floods the signal already concerning World War Two, the true story, whatever it is, would probably have to take this form: a tall tale from a drunk rogue spy.
So, what does Hallett claim? First of all he claims that Hitler lived in Liverpool for something like six or eight months in (I believe) 1912 where he was "deconstructed" by the mind-eaters in British Intelligence, in other words, subjected to trauma-based mind control and brainwashing. His sister apparently mentions this in her autobiography. Hallett claims that Hitler's father was conceived in an occult ritual in which three separate masked Rothschilds raped his mother on some special Satanic date. From this moment on the British secret services kept tabs on the Hitler family in order to use them; apparently the Cabal has stables and stables of such illegitimate offspring that they use as high-level puppets in politics and entertainment. Hallett claims that Stalin was also a brainwashed and controlled Rothschild bastard.
Psychologically, Hallett's Hitler makes sense. There is a lot of evidence that he was financed and guided by London, but he always appeared too sincere in his performance to be a pure actor or puppet. I think he probably hypnotized himself into believing everything he said as he was saying it. Hallett says that his mind was completely shattered during his deconstruction, and from that moment on he was neither an "actor" nor a "sincere individual" but rather some kind of dissociated golem or zombi who was under the psychic control of his handlers, among them Dr. Morell, Bormann, and Hess, all with links to British (Rothschild) Intelligence. Part of his deconstruction included equipping him with extreme sado-masochistic sexual perversions that allowed him to be humiliated and remote-controlled. He was also zonked on dope 24/7 and poisoned by Dr. Morell to boot.
Hallett claims that British Intelligence double-crossed Hitler in early 1941 after originally promising him that the stage-managed war would last for only eighteen months (the "Phoney War" period), after which time Hitler would be in charge of a more powerful Germany, given half of Poland, etc. The purpose of this Phoney War was, among other things, to bring France under the control of London and neutralize their secret societies. Meanwhile in the UK, Churchill, himself both a Royal and a Rothschild bastard (yet another), was busy double-crossing the Royals, who, like Hitler, had been tricked into believing Germany would win the war and ally with Britain (hence all the Nazi sympathizers among the aristocracy in England). In other words, the Rothschilds were staging a coup against the monarchy, whom they had already sufficiently rotted out from the inside. In April, 1941, both Hitler and Stalin realized that they had been played by Churchill and were now in way over their heads. From this point on the war became more of a real war, with Britain, or rather Churchill, still manipulating both Stalin and the top Nazi command through a series of deconstructed and compromised double agents. At some point, all the top Nazis figured out that they were scripted to lose the war and began turning traitor to save their hides if they weren't agents already. Stalin comes across from Hallett's account as a less easily controllable individual while Churchill emerges as a kind of Satanic figure of absolute deception and destruction on behalf of the Rothschild empire. All three, Stalin, Churchill, and Hitler were used by the Cabal to destroy their own nations and their "own" people, with Churchill being, in his own way, just as much of a puppet as the other two.
One of the themes of this thread has been "who really won the war". I would like to add a few observations here. I was shocked to learn that more historical architecture in Germany was destroyed AFTER the war in "urban renewal" projects than during the war. I was also shocked to discover that the Nazis intended to raze Berlin to the ground and replace it with a completely new city called "Germania". Indeed, work had already begun on Germania before the war started. This makes me think of the incredible campaigns of architectural destruction that occurred in the United States and to a lesser extent the UK in the 1950's, 60's, and 70's. This went hand in hand with the expansion of the Autobahn system, developed in Nazi Germany. But this didn't happen everywhere. Contrast this with Paris where, when developers tore down Les Halles and built the hideous Montparnasse Tower in the late 60's, the negative reaction was so strong that all further redevelopment plans were shelved, thank God. As anyone who has walked around a big German city or taken a train across Germany knows, it is a mostly charmless and depressing place, with the exception of the beautiful natural scenery and the occasional preserved old village or city square. Then again, when you stroll through Weimar or Heidelberg, you get a glimpse of how glorious Germany once must have been.
What is striking here is that what happened in Germany (and the US) after the war was in many ways exactly what the Nazis had hoped for: the complete reorganization of society in a way that benefited capital and industry first, a Gleichschaltung of industry and the state, a streamlining and "instrumentalization" of life in the service of capital, work, and a "quantifiable" vision of the public good, one that is measured strictly in terms of money and productivity. In this worldview, a grid city made of ahistorical glass cubes is far preferable to an old-world city with stone buildings, fountains, curved roads, etc. In other words, the way Mitte in Berlin looks today is basically congruent with what Speer intended, and if the Allies hadn't bombed Dresden, the Nazis would have maybe torn it down anyway after the war. THIS is what the Nazis stood for: not the German People, but the dream of a massified collective subjected entirely to the diktats of industry. And from this point of view it makes perfect sense that the postwar government of Germany was full of ex-Nazis who quietly continued the transformation of Germany into a tightly-controlled factory nation. Was anyone in Germany organically enthusiastic about the proposed razing of Berlin? Was anyone in the US enthusiastic about the destruction of the old cities and their replacement by hideous concrete wastelands? I doubt it.
Seen from this angle, Hallett's thesis makes sense. Like all traumatized people, the humiliated and exploited Germans of the Weimar period were ripe for losing themselves in a collective dissociative fantasy of triumph and grandeur, and the Cabal stage managers in London were happy to provide one, complete with actors, costumes and rituals, in order to lure the Germans into accepting a program that otherwise they would have rejected, namely a complete destruction and reorganization of their entire society. What better way to push through a program of forced "modernization" than by psychologically associating such a program of destruction with a delusional rebirth? Cults always promise rebirth and deliver death. The post-Covid "New Normal" is a case in point. The Nazis didn't love Germans as they were; they loved them only inasmuch as they consented to become New Germans. From the point of view of the Cabal, it doesn't matter what nation or what leader "wins". What matters is that the old world is destroyed and that life becomes more ugly and more profitable for them. Seen in this light, the Nazi period was the third (knockout) blow that had been set up by the first two (World War One and Weimar). Both the Nazis and the Jews won, in other words, but the Nazis aren't exactly Nazis and the Jews aren't exactly Jews, if that makes sense. Life in the West was both collectively "Nazified" (reduced to a streamlined existence in service of capital and conformity) AND "Judaized" (cut off from any organic traditions, emptied of any content).
It is interesting to compare the fates of Germany and France. Notice how no one here ever talks about France in the context of World War Two. I wonder what kind of secret diplomacy went on behind closed doors to keep France mostly unhurt in the general melee. I believe that France (or perhaps Italy) is the European country that suffered the least from the war in terms of damage to its soul. Britain, Russia, and Germany all ended up corrupted in different ways, but in France the old-world art of life persisted, at least for a while. De Gaulle is a much less sinister character than the wartime leaders of the three other nations in question. On the human level, in France people generally know how to find balance. They understand the importance of work without fetishizing it too much, they enjoy nice food without being gluttons, they have a healthy relationship with sex, they balance family life and individual freedom, they are not too interested in ideology, they are morally flexible without being outright sociopaths...I think that perhaps it is here that we catch a faint glimpse of what life might have been like across all of Europe at one point. Of course, the NWO is busy bludgeoning France into submission with the blunt weapon of mass immigration, but the memory of the Old World is still much, much stronger there than it is in Germany. Dreamtime, in your original post you mention how Michael Ende rediscovered something of the prewar Munich spirit in Italy, which would indeed suggest that today's Germans are something of an artificial construct and once resembled "real people" more.
I spent a few years in Germany and it's a pretty sad place these days. Whatever they once might have been, they aren't anymore. There is something weirdly autistic and robotic about the German character today and I do not know if this is some Kantian heritage or rather a postwar development. You can sometimes still catch a glimpse of the original healthy collective impulse, but it seems to have become twisted and Stasified. The controllers have figured Germans out and know how to manipulate them. Every nation has its own control system tailored to the vices and weaknesses of the people. Germans are obsessed with morality and also with being right. They get high on it. They take pleasure in shaming and dominating others in the guise of educating them. This trait appears to me to be a now-perverted remnant of a time when citizens spontaneously took responsibility for maintaining order in the absence of central control. Today this old habit is a perfect psychic thumbscrew for our masters. By controlling the definition of Good and Bad through media propaganda, our masters can hack directly into the German mind and turn their targets into remote-controlled slaves who will then attack whomever they are directed to in the full belief that (1) they are working directly for the Moral Good itself and (2) they have discerned this Moral Good using independent Reason. There was no need for cops to enforce mask rules in Germany; the masochists were happy to voluntarily submit and the sadists were thrilled to have the opportunity to shame, lecture, and threaten others. Germans are Believers. It never seems to occur to them that their masters are evil and could lie to them, since unlike Latin Europeans, they themselves have a hard time lying...which is another piece of evidence that things were possibly once much more idyllic in Germany.
The world "Germany" itself is related to the word brotherhood ("hermano" in Spanish) and the political history of Germany was always marked more by brotherhood and confederacy than by top-down authoritarianism, associated with Rome. In all fairness, one also regularly encounters Germans who seem to yearn for freedom. I don't wish to insult anyone, especially the OP, but I would be lying if I said I found German culture today to be to my taste. My question is the following. Assuming there was once a more idyllic political system in Germany, is there any way for such a hypothetical decentralized social/political system to work psychologically without everyone having to become a part-time cop/snitch/priest/moralizer/blind rule-follower/Besserwisser/Rechtshaber/teacher/closet sexual fetishist, which is what many Germans are today? In the Latin world, this function is delegated to the police, whom most people hate, but whose existence at least allows private citizens NOT to have to police each other. And German cops are indeed less hardcore than Italian or French cops. It is easy for us to fantasize about an old unified world in which people were free from the tyranny of centralized state power, but psychologically is it feasible? Was there no need for control mechanisms, or were these control mechanisms simply internalized, rendered invisible, and celebrated in private as BDSM rituals?
I will end with the following quotation from Garibaldi from 1865, in a letter to a German friend:
The progress of humanity seems to have come to a halt, and you with your superior intelligence will know why. The reason is that the world lacks a nation which possesses true leadership. Such leadership, of course, is required not to dominate other peoples, but to lead them along the path of duty, to lead them toward the brotherhood of nations where all the barriers erected by egoism will be destroyed. We need the kind of leadership which, in the true tradition of medieval chivalry, would devote itself to redressing wrongs, supporting the weak, sacrificing momentary gains and material advantage for the much finer and more satisfying achievement of relieving the suffering of our fellow men. We need a nation courageous enough to give us a lead in this direction. It would rally to its cause all those who are suffering wrong or who aspire to a better life, and all those who are now enduring foreign oppression. This role of world leadership, left vacant as things are today, might well be occupied by the German nation. You Germans, with your grave and philosophic character, might well be the ones who could win the confidence of others and guarantee the future stability of the international community. Let us hope, then, that you can use your energy to overcome your moth-eaten thirty tyrants of the various German states. Let us hope that in the centre of Europe you can then make a unified nation out of your fifty million. All the rest of us would eagerly and joyfully follow you.
At first this looks sweet and cuddly. But if you step to the side a little and see in Garibaldi an early agent of the centralized, Masonic New World Order (he was Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy...if he was even real, his biography is unbelievable) things look very different. I see a deceiver employing flattery and blandishment. De-spun, what he is saying here is more like: you idiot Germans with your arrogance, your autistic rule-following and your unconscious moral sadism are perfect dupes to advance our Masonic one-world agenda. We will use your naive belief in ideals to dominate the world, then sacrifice you to our one-eyed God after we've squeezed you dry...
