The Secret War Against Germania and its Historical Roots (part 5)

[matematik]

Agreed, the lack of gendered nouns is a peculiarity I haven't been able to figure out. I mean, it's a dumb concept to start out with, but most - if not all - so-called Indo-European languages including Russian and presumably Slavic use it.

I think Persian and Armenian don't have gendered nouns either, but I don't think they ever had it from what I can gather. The only other IE language that has undergone similar changes to English is Afrikaans, although in that case the simplification has been even more extreme. Afrikaans is basically Dutch but without the gender system, irregular verbs, etc.

Clearly the purpose of Afrikaans was to make communication between the Dutch settlers and the native Khoi-San as easy as possible, so I suspect not using the gender system and regularising verbs was done deliberately to make the language as simple as possible, so essentially an artificial shift done to serve a specific purpose.

It seems logical to assume that English underwent similar changes for the same reason, but in the canonical history there is no obvious reason for such a dramatic shift from Old English to Middle English, I'm not aware that there was any big influx of foreigners that would have required an easing of communication during that period.

The history of English is certainly very strange though, because the history of linguistics in general shows that languages tend to be pretty resistant to change unless there is an urgent need to do so.

 

[Golden Stag]

I am mystified by the responses since I humbly posted the video link that argues that Adolf Hitler is a child of a Rothschild bastard. Did I hit a nerve?

Looking at how WW2 played out with 20/20 hindsight, we see that his actions played into the hands of TPTB by giving them someone they could dress up as a boogeyman, and dress him up, they did, with shrunken skulls, human soaps and lampshades. Whether he did it knowingly and willingly or in the role of a useful idiot is the real question. I think that a trap was set for him, and he stepped into it without realizing the scope of the enemy he was facing. His greatest mistakes IMO included:

• Allowing British troops to evacuate Dunkirk in 1940 was probably his first major blunder, still hoping for a peaceful resolution to end the war as evidenced by his numerous peace treaty proposals that were ignored. Destroying the evacuating army would have eliminated the western threat entirely, considering that the rest of the West folded like a white flag.
• Taking the fight to Russia. Sure, Russia would have attacked eventually, and maybe even soon, but giving them the home field advantage was folly.
• For all of Hitler's "anti-semitism", he sure had enough Jewish scientist around him who managed to steal the nuclear technology (betraying their host nations in the process) that was instrumental to the hopeless Manhattan project's completion. The fabled superior Jewish intellect is just that, a fable, no need to look further than that celebrity patent office clerk. There were plenty of other scientists working on the project, just look at all those German scientists the US acquired via Operation Paperclip, and I know of around a dozen Hungarian contributors who mysteriously suicided themselves after the secrets were leaked.
• While it didn't matter for Germany by this time since it was surrounded, but attempting to send their refined uranium to Japan via submarine(s) was also a mistake that the Japanese paid for very dearly.

In short, I think he underestimated his enemy's resolve, and how far they were willing to go to achieve their end. If he had a time machine and had a chance to see the fate of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he would have understood the nature of the enemy he was facing. These blunders could be considered some elaborate ruse to have Hitler set Germany and himself up as the fall guy, but I find the theory of him being a Zionist agent unlikely because:

• He was the only person in history to imprison a Rothschild, and forced quite a few of the clan to liquidate their assets, seizing whatever wasn't sold in time. He also publicly declared them as enemies of Germany.
• He reversed the cultural subversion of the Weimar Republic
• He brought national pride back to the hearts of his people, which is in stark contrast to the aspirations of international Jewry. It's funny how they don't want any internationalism in Israel, only for everyone else.
• The effectiveness of his "Labor Treasury Certificates" meant to replace debt-based fiat currency may be debated, but it's clear that he was no fan of usury, the bread and butter of the Tribe.
• He introduced the first animal cruelty laws in Europe, essentially outlawing Kosher slaughter

Now, I don't know about you, but I don't think this is a particularly good way of endearing yourself to your master. A quote below from the book "The House of Rothschild: Volume 2: The World's Banker: 1849-1999" elaborates a bit on the anti-Rothschild actions of the National Socialists.

“An altogether more ruthless coalition had come to power in Germany in 1933, dominated by the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Hostility to the Rothschilds’ had been a feature of Nazi propaganda from the movement’s infancy (see introduction to volume 1) despite the fact that the Frankfurt house had been wound up when Hitler was barely twelve years old. It was a hostility that soon translated into action.

At first the attacks were largely symbolic: in December 1933 the Frankfurt Rothschildallee was renamed Karolingerallee, while the Luisenplatz and Mathildenstrasse lost the plaques identifying them with members of the family. It was not until April 1938, with the “Ordinance on the Registration of Jewish Assets,” that Rothschild property came under direct attack. In the wake of the orchestrated anti-Semitic demonstrations of the following November (Reichskristallnacht), nearly all the myriad of charitable and educational foundations — of which there were around twenty — were dissolved, with the exception of the Carolinum Dental Clinic, which had become part of the Frankfurt University.

[...] The private property of the few family members still resident in Germany was expropriated by similar methods, though there was in fact relatively little of it left by 1938. Before the process of confiscation began, Max von-Goldscmidt-Rothschild’s son Albert, Rudolf and Erich sold the family houses at the Grüneburg and Königstein and opted to emigrate (Albert to Switzerland, where he committed suicide in 1941 when faced with the threat of expulsion).

[...] Although Louis had to hand over most of his Austrian assets to secure his own release, the family was able to insist that a price be paid for Witkowitz (albeit a discounted price)

[...] By 1939, of course, numerous members of the Rothschild family were themselves refugees. The German invasion of France in May 1940 increased their number substantially.

[...] Occupied France to confiscate “possessions of the Palais Rothschild,” including any which had been handed over to the French state. The following month, the Germans ordered that administrators be put in charge of the Jewish firms. The Luftwaffe and later a German general occupied the Rothschild house at 23 avenue de Marigny.

 

[SonofaBor]

He brought national pride back to the hearts of his people, which is in stark contrast to the aspirations of international Jewry. It's funny how they don't want any internationalism in Israel, only for everyone else.

Or he capitalized-- or simply played a part-- on a traumatized people and, as he said, "drove divisions into dust."

 

[Golden Stag]

He brought national pride back to the hearts of his people, which is in stark contrast to the aspirations of international Jewry. It's funny how they don't want any internationalism in Israel, only for everyone else.

Or he capitalized-- or simply played a part-- on a traumatized people and, as he said, "drove divisions into dust."

Maybe, but seeing some footage of how the German people behaved around him, and listening to some interviews of how the Germans who were kids at the time remember the pre-war years seems to paint a different story. Now granted, having grown up in a socialist regime for a while, I remember celebrating the Great October Revolution with seemingly glee in elementary school, so one could argue that it was fear of the authority that kept people in line. Kind of like the Cancel Culture is doing today, but I don't believe this was the case in Germany. While the kids did not know any better at the time, a lot of the adults felt the weight of the oppression, which was not evident from the various German footage I've seen.

How do you suppose one drives divisions into the dust? I would assume by targeting and neutralizing the divisive agents/elements in society. My initial point remains, instead of the millennia long PTB tradition of divide and conquer, he did the exact opposite and united his people.

 

[freygeist]

How do you suppose one drives divisions into the dust? I would assume by targeting and neutralizing the divisive agents/elements in society. My initial point remains, instead of the millennia long PTB tradition of divide and conquer, he did the exact opposite and united his people.

I agree on that, i mean thats the whole reason he called it National Socialism. He wanted to bridge the gap between left and right. It was truly a "Querfront" movement. (I dont know how to translate that properly...)

 

[codis]

... so one could argue that it was fear of the authority that kept people in line. Kind of like the Cancel Culture is doing today, but I don't believe this was the case in Germany. While the kids did not know any better at the time, a lot of the adults felt the weight of the oppression, which was not evident from the various German footage I've seen.

Seems we are sharing some memories ...
Anyway, a remark to kids and cancel culture. I lately realized it existed in the Eastern Bloc in almost identical form as known today.
I remember having seen some fairytale movies at ages 5 ... 8, which suddenly disappeared from the screen. As I later realized, one of the actors (a quite famous one) went to the West. Actually he was expelled for protesting the silencing of another songwriter.
All other recorded public appearances of this man (Manfred Krug) disappeared simultaneously - as if he never existed.

 

[matematik]

Allowing British troops to evacuate Dunkirk in 1940 was probably his first major blunder, still hoping for a peaceful resolution to end the war as evidenced by his numerous peace treaty proposals that were ignored. Destroying the evacuating army would have eliminated the western threat entirely, considering that the rest of the West folded like a white flag.

Why are pro-Hitler types always vehemently anti-British but pro-Russian, considering it's Russia who crushed Germany most of all and most humiliatingly. You seem to relish the idea that British troops could have been massacred and crushed, but seem almost sad that Germany and Russia had a bloody war.

Russia today is by far the most jingoistic about its WW2 history, so it seems strange to me how pro-Hitler types idolise Russia.

 

[Collapseinrealtime]

I am mystified by the responses since I humbly posted the video link that argues that Adolf Hitler is a child of a Rothschild bastard. Did I hit a nerve?

Looking at how WW2 played out with 20/20 hindsight, we see that his actions played into the hands of TPTB by giving them someone they could dress up as a boogeyman, and dress him up, they did, with shrunken skulls, human soaps and lampshades. Whether he did it knowingly and willingly or in the role of a useful idiot is the real question. I think that a trap was set for him, and he stepped into it without realizing the scope of the enemy he was facing. His greatest mistakes IMO included:

• Allowing British troops to evacuate Dunkirk in 1940 was probably his first major blunder, still hoping for a peaceful resolution to end the war as evidenced by his numerous peace treaty proposals that were ignored. Destroying the evacuating army would have eliminated the western threat entirely, considering that the rest of the West folded like a white flag.
• Taking the fight to Russia. Sure, Russia would have attacked eventually, and maybe even soon, but giving them the home field advantage was folly.
• For all of Hitler's "anti-semitism", he sure had enough Jewish scientist around him who managed to steal the nuclear technology (betraying their host nations in the process) that was instrumental to the hopeless Manhattan project's completion. The fabled superior Jewish intellect is just that, a fable, no need to look further than that celebrity patent office clerk. There were plenty of other scientists working on the project, just look at all those German scientists the US acquired via Operation Paperclip, and I know of around a dozen Hungarian contributors who mysteriously suicided themselves after the secrets were leaked.
• While it didn't matter for Germany by this time since it was surrounded, but attempting to send their refined uranium to Japan via submarine(s) was also a mistake that the Japanese paid for very dearly.

In short, I think he underestimated his enemy's resolve, and how far they were willing to go to achieve their end. If he had a time machine and had a chance to see the fate of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he would have understood the nature of the enemy he was facing. These blunders could be considered some elaborate ruse to have Hitler set Germany and himself up as the fall guy, but I find the theory of him being a Zionist agent unlikely because:

• He was the only person in history to imprison a Rothschild, and forced quite a few of the clan to liquidate their assets, seizing whatever wasn't sold in time. He also publicly declared them as enemies of Germany.
• He reversed the cultural subversion of the Weimar Republic
• He brought national pride back to the hearts of his people, which is in stark contrast to the aspirations of international Jewry. It's funny how they don't want any internationalism in Israel, only for everyone else.
• The effectiveness of his "Labor Treasury Certificates" meant to replace debt-based fiat currency may be debated, but it's clear that he was no fan of usury, the bread and butter of the Tribe.
• He introduced the first animal cruelty laws in Europe, essentially outlawing Kosher slaughter

Now, I don't know about you, but I don't think this is a particularly good way of endearing yourself to your master. A quote below from the book "The House of Rothschild: Volume 2: The World's Banker: 1849-1999" elaborates a bit on the anti-Rothschild actions of the National Socialists.

“An altogether more ruthless coalition had come to power in Germany in 1933, dominated by the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Hostility to the Rothschilds’ had been a feature of Nazi propaganda from the movement’s infancy (see introduction to volume 1) despite the fact that the Frankfurt house had been wound up when Hitler was barely twelve years old. It was a hostility that soon translated into action.

At first the attacks were largely symbolic: in December 1933 the Frankfurt Rothschildallee was renamed Karolingerallee, while the Luisenplatz and Mathildenstrasse lost the plaques identifying them with members of the family. It was not until April 1938, with the “Ordinance on the Registration of Jewish Assets,” that Rothschild property came under direct attack. In the wake of the orchestrated anti-Semitic demonstrations of the following November (Reichskristallnacht), nearly all the myriad of charitable and educational foundations — of which there were around twenty — were dissolved, with the exception of the Carolinum Dental Clinic, which had become part of the Frankfurt University.

[...] The private property of the few family members still resident in Germany was expropriated by similar methods, though there was in fact relatively little of it left by 1938. Before the process of confiscation began, Max von-Goldscmidt-Rothschild’s son Albert, Rudolf and Erich sold the family houses at the Grüneburg and Königstein and opted to emigrate (Albert to Switzerland, where he committed suicide in 1941 when faced with the threat of expulsion).

[...] Although Louis had to hand over most of his Austrian assets to secure his own release, the family was able to insist that a price be paid for Witkowitz (albeit a discounted price)

[...] By 1939, of course, numerous members of the Rothschild family were themselves refugees. The German invasion of France in May 1940 increased their number substantially.

[...] Occupied France to confiscate “possessions of the Palais Rothschild,” including any which had been handed over to the French state. The following month, the Germans ordered that administrators be put in charge of the Jewish firms. The Luftwaffe and later a German general occupied the Rothschild house at 23 avenue de Marigny.

[/QUOTE
I don't think anyone can disagree with the idea that Hitler was not only a populist leader, but gave Germany a glimpse of what a golden age must be like. All one has to do is to remove the pressure of the parasite, and in a relatively short period of time, the host nation will begin to once again see the fruits of their labor. The question is not whether Hitler did amazing things to free the German people. It is whether Hitler's populism was genuine or was it for a greater purpose to later further enslave the Germans. Also, was it Hitler himself in control of German policy, or was that a fallacy as well? Did Hitler love the German people, or was he just having a laugh at them?

I also do not buy the Rothschild story that Hitler was a servant's bastard, since the so-called evidence is entirely circumstantial and could have been made up from whole cloth.

I'm currently researching the idea that Hitler was actually a Roosevelt (Kermit Roosevelt) and was groomed by his father, Teddy, to play the part of faux populist to become the ultimate Judas goat, leading the German people to their slaughter. He seems to have also played other prominent characters, such as Walt Disney, Father Coughlin, and even perhaps Walter Kronkite. This is a working theory based on Dallas Goldbug's work, which has many possibilities, but remains just a theory at this point. The more I look into this as a possibility, the more things seem to be lining up. Considering the amount of Jewish influence that took place behind the scenes of the Third Reich, I am convinced that Hitler was always a Rothschild stooge who contained special talents that allowed them to take the controlled-opposition ruse to a very next-level magickal kind of deception.

When you also consider how quickly the Allies were able to roll back all of Hitler's populist policies after the war, it just goes to show how thoroughly duped the German people and the whole peasant world for that matter were. We see many parallels with the current Biden administration rewriting the Constitution one executive order at a time.

The reason we collectively need to heal and wake up to all of the World War I & II propaganda and see it for what it really is, is because if we do not, the controllers will continue to employ these deceptive faux populist tactics in their modern playbook to fool us into greater levels of servitude. Notice how the controlled opposition always keeps everyone divided and disagreeing about what actually took place during and prior to WWII. You have your mainstream history that paints Hitler as the ultimate psychopathic monster with millions dead on his watch. And then you have the other side painting Hitler as the ultimate German populist hero, largely ignoring the very strong likelihood that he was controlled opposition. With these two raging arguments going back and forth, it frees up the controllers to continue with their intrigue, because no one has identified or acknowledged the giant white elephant in the room. As a sincere, community-loving people, we are far too trusting and naive, often allowing for the parasites to walk all over us. We need to get away from the idea that someone can save us from our demise and learn how to save ourselves.

Until we can overcome our collective fear of the unknown (death), we will be slaves to that fear, and therefore slaves to the controllers, who do everything in their power to keep us afraid.

Once the races can unite against the parasite race, we can all work together collectively to eradicate the disease of usury. As long as usury is the way we continue to do business, we will remain slaves.

 

[SonofaBor]

How do you suppose one drives divisions into the dust? I would assume by targeting and neutralizing the divisive agents/elements in society. My initial point remains, instead of the millennia long PTB tradition of divide and conquer, he did the exact opposite and united his people.

I might be in the minority here, but I think he was a false messiah.

 

[Golden Stag]

Allowing British troops to evacuate Dunkirk in 1940 was probably his first major blunder, still hoping for a peaceful resolution to end the war as evidenced by his numerous peace treaty proposals that were ignored. Destroying the evacuating army would have eliminated the western threat entirely, considering that the rest of the West folded like a white flag.

Why are pro-Hitler types always vehemently anti-British but pro-Russian, considering it's Russia who crushed Germany most of all and most humiliatingly. You seem to relish the idea that British troops could have been massacred and crushed, but seem almost sad that Germany and Russia had a bloody war.

Russia today is by far the most jingoistic about its WW2 history, so it seems strange to me how pro-Hitler types idolise Russia.

I'm not sure what I've said that points to me idolizing Russia. The Bolshevik regime was as brutal to its "own" people as it was to others. Russian intelligentsia who opposed their ideology found themselves in Gulags, never to return in a lot of cases, and dissenters from the Eastern Block outside Russia shared a similar fate. The Russian liberation of Hungary from the "evil forces" was much akin to how the Hapsburg liberated us from the Ottoman Empire. They forgot to leave. The 1956 revolution that started out as a peaceful protest by university students ended in a bloodbath with significant reprisal from the occupying force.

But even before the Bolshevik reign, I'm dubious about Russia's role in history, as it seems like they were directly serving the interests of PTB. What was Tsar Nicholas II's money doing in Rothschild banks? Why would the Tsar Nicholas I aid in restoring "law & order" in Hungary after the Hapsburg forces were defeated during the revolution of 1848-49? And there's the whole question about how Tartaria ended up as part of the Russian Empire, and whether or not Napoleon had any role to play in it.

So no, I don't idolize the Bolshevik regime and their "accomplishments", and I think they were probably the most callous of all participants in WW2. One of the main differences I see between British and the Russian is that the Russian folk were beaten into compliance, much like the rest of the Eastern Block. In England, however, outside of Oswald Mosley's party that was disbanded in 1940 with its leader imprisoned for a few years, I don't recall much anti-war sentiment among the population. There were no British gulags, and people lived relatively well and free. They just decided to accepted the convenient official narrative.

As for the massacring of British troops, I don't "relish" the idea, merely pointing out the strategic mistake with 20/20 hindsight. Hitler was not committed to the war against the West, whereas Britain and the rest of the allied forces clearly were. This is why I think Hitler was more of an idealist, who hoped to resolve the conflict stemming from WW1's concluding so-called peace treaties without continuously escalating the scale of the war.

I believe that a German-Russian alliance at the start of WW1 had a chance to stand up against TPTB, and this is why the two powers had to be set against each other in the hopes of mutual destruction. By the time WW2 rolled around, there was no hope for such an alliance, as it was only the matter of time before Russia played their assigned role, and attacked Germany. Let me ask you this. How do you feel about the Anglo-Polish Agreement of 1939 in light of how history played out? Do you think Poland got its money's worth from this bargain? Do you think England had any plans to uphold their end of the deal, and not just use it as an excuse to enter the war they were so eager to fight?

 

[JWW427]

Stag
you know your WW2 history well.
I did a post somewhere on Rudolph Hess' flight to Scotland in 1941. It may shed some light on why Hitler and his lieutenants didn't want a war with fellow Aryans. There was much more to the occult in these matters than normal people think.
As I learn more and more about what really may have happened in the 20th century, the world wars become something quite different from what we are taught. The big banks and Black Nobility were behind much of it for profit.

As for Poland, she did get help from France and Britain in the west, but Gen. Geuderian's Blitzkrieg made short work of that front. (And the Ribbentrop Pact with Russia) Germany had fresh modern tactics combined with up to date weapons like the Stuka and the fast Panzer 2s. The Versailles Treaty forced them to toss away their old weapon designs (Almost all of them) and start anew. French and English generals were still fighting the last war, as it were. (French tanks had no radios and were unorganized).

Its amazing what the Germans achieved since horses still pulled many of their guns and supply wagons all throughout the war since they never, ever, ever had enough fuel. For Pete's sake they almost won the war twice even though their vehicles froze and their soldiers were wearing 19th century wool uniforms and coats and had mostly bolt action rifles. WTF? We must continually ask ourselves: How? Why?



There is some circumstantial evidence that the Rockefellers and other Illuminati types funded Lenin and the Bolshies before WW1 to counter the potential alliance with Germany. It does make geopolitical sense if its true. A commie totalitarian Russia would be the world's bogeyman, a large RED bear to be feared.
War is for its own sake, alliances shift with the sands, royal squabbles and petty conflicts were omnipresent to keep Europe slowly simmering with profit-making wars. Always follow the money, the confusing politics will follow in turn.



If you look into the story of Rasputin, one might come away with the sense that the Romanovs were still deeply into the old Russian ways and the occult. The Bolsheviks did away with all that jazz in a jiffy.
Old orders and monarchies were dying out due to natural selection and murderous schemes for power centralization throughout Europe, yet in secret they still ruled with an iron fist. I think the point of all that was window dressing for the masses, a sense of real change despite everything being status quo in secret. Things changed temporarily, but they always stayed the same in the long run. The masses have short memories.



Its a viable argument that Stalin was slightly worse than Hitler.
Both nations had gulags, but the Russians had no qualms killing many of their own troops. Stalin and the Allies wanted victory at any cost since he knew the Germans were way ahead technically, especially with thermobaric barrage rockets and nukes.
German physicists were quickly busying themselves with many WMD secret projects.



Humble, blue-collar Stalin's counter? Mass tank attacks, proper padded winter coats and fur hats that kept his troops warmer and less fatigued, "General Frost," super-muddy roads that defy imagination, tough Siberian troops on Skis, manpower in the millions, and better oil reserves. And don't forget the American-built Iranian railway that supplied Stalin from the south.
The Russian T-34 tanks were a masterpiece of high production numbers, simplicity, and sloping armor design.
"Quantity has a quality all of its own," said Uncle Joe.

 

[Golden Stag]

I don't think anyone can disagree with the idea that Hitler was not only a populist leader, but gave Germany a glimpse of what a golden age must be like. All one has to do is to remove the pressure of the parasite, and in a relatively short period of time, the host nation will begin to once again see the fruits of their labor. The question is not whether Hitler did amazing things to free the German people. It is whether Hitler's populism was genuine or was it for a greater purpose to later further enslave the Germans. Also, was it Hitler himself in control of German policy, or was that a fallacy as well? Did Hitler love the German people, or was he just having a laugh at them?

I also do not buy the Rothschild story that Hitler was a servant's bastard, since the so-called evidence is entirely circumstantial and could have been made up from whole cloth.

I'm currently researching the idea that Hitler was actually a Roosevelt (Kermit Roosevelt) and was groomed by his father, Teddy, to play the part of faux populist to become the ultimate Judas goat, leading the German people to their slaughter. He seems to have also played other prominent characters, such as Walt Disney, Father Coughlin, and even perhaps Walter Kronkite. This is a working theory based on Dallas Goldbug's work, which has many possibilities, but remains just a theory at this point. The more I look into this as a possibility, the more things seem to be lining up. Considering the amount of Jewish influence that took place behind the scenes of the Third Reich, I am convinced that Hitler was always a Rothschild stooge who contained special talents that allowed them to take the controlled-opposition ruse to a very next-level magickal kind of deception.

I've not heard of Dallas Goldbug, but I'll take a look at his work, I'm particularly curious to Hitler's motivations and what he hoped to gain according to this hypothesis. If Hitler cared nothing for his people and willingly lead them into the trap, we can safely say he was a psychopath, as this behavior would check off a number of attributes associated with the disorder. So, let's assume he was a psychopath, what was in it for him? What was prize for allowing him to be dressed as the boogeyman, and betraying his nation? Just for sh1tz & giggles, to help "the cause" or maybe a lifelong all-inclusive vacation on the shores of Argentina?

Approaching the theory from TPTB's angle, I think if the ultimate goal was the enslave German people, it could have been done much more efficiently. The nation was heading that way as is, there was no need for an elaborate rouse. Sow more division, amplify the cultural decay for a few more decades and the resulting apathy would have created a rootless nation. If the goal was for Germans to never fall for another nationalist movement for the fear of being labelled this and that, that was successfully achieved, but that is still well short of the assumed goal of enslaving a nation. They actually had to inject money into the German economy to lull its population into complacency, resulting in the high standard of living in West Germany throughout the 70s and 80s.

The saying about financing both sides of the war has been around for a while, so there's no reason why it couldn't be expanded to financing all 3 sides of the war, too. Russia was clearly a controlled opposition, who while fighting the same enemy as the rest of the alliance, were clearly not on the Allied Force's side, as subsequent history has shown. I'm willing to concede that Germany was controlled opposition, too, but at the very least, the back story of Hitler and the Harvard educated Teddy should line up a bit, and gaining some clarity of the motivating forces at work would also help.

When you also consider how quickly the Allies were able to roll back all of Hitler's populist policies after the war, it just goes to show how thoroughly duped the German people and the whole peasant world for that matter were. We see many parallels with the current Biden administration rewriting the Constitution one executive order at a time.

I don't think the Germans had much say regarding their policies post-WW2, allied puppets did what they were told to get Germany back under the thumbs of TPTB. The German spirit was broken once again, and remains so to this day, too timid to voice their displeasure. Their politicians are bought and paid for, and not only are they not serving the interests of their people, but they are the primary drivers of the globalist agenda attempting to destabilize the rest of Europe. Social cohesion is at an all time low, and I can't think of a quick fix for the situation the majority of Europe find themselves in today.

The reason we collectively need to heal and wake up to all of the World War I & II propaganda and see it for what it really is, is because if we do not, the controllers will continue to employ these deceptive faux populist tactics in their modern playbook to fool us into greater levels of servitude. Notice how the controlled opposition always keeps everyone divided and disagreeing about what actually took place during and prior to WWII. You have your mainstream history that paints Hitler as the ultimate psychopathic monster with millions dead on his watch. And then you have the other side painting Hitler as the ultimate German populist hero, largely ignoring the very strong likelihood that he was controlled opposition. With these two raging arguments going back and forth, it frees up the controllers to continue with their intrigue, because no one has identified or acknowledged the giant white elephant in the room. As a sincere, community-loving people, we are far too trusting and naive, often allowing for the parasites to walk all over us. We need to get away from the idea that someone can save us from our demise and learn how to save ourselves.

Until we can overcome our collective fear of the unknown (death), we will be slaves to that fear, and therefore slaves to the controllers, who do everything in their power to keep us afraid.

Once the races can unite against the parasite race, we can all work together collectively to eradicate the disease of usury. As long as usury is the way we continue to do business, we will remain slaves.

While I agree, this is easier said that done.

First we need to figure out what happened by find alternate sources of information, the majority of which were destroyed by allied forces. Then we need to discern the truth of said information, which is much akin to attempting to place a random piece of puzzle on the board, when a large percentage of the pieces are missing.

After collecting wagon loads of files from the losing side of both wars, the longstanding book-burning tradition was practiced to eliminate the most damaging evidence. While the previous link relates to the destruction of British colonial documents, the same fate befell on a lot of WWI / WWII documents. And it wasn't just the enemy records that were purged, there are no remaining records of British parliament transcripts from the time when Britain was debating on joining WWII, and when they officially entered. Some of the less incriminating documents may still exist tucked away in places like Hoover Institution of Stanford or the fortress of Hanslope Park in England, but it's unlikely they'll see the light of day without the help of some whistleblowers. Apologies for The Guardian link, but they seem to be the primary outlet who even care about this building.

There are still some documentation floating around from original sources that may shed some on what went on behind the scenes. "H. H. Asquith Letters to Venetia Stanley" supposedly has some information about the documents that were destroyed from the WW1 era. I couldn't find a readily accessible PDF version, and considering that this is a collection of letters between lovers, I'm not sure I want to order a physical copy. The "War Memoirs of David Lloyd George" is another lengthy series of books (2000+ pages), that is supposed to contain some detailed and seemingly honest recounting of events as seen from behind the scenes. Volume 1 and 2 can be found online. I included the links for the 2nd edition, since it only has two volumes instead of the 1st edition's six. I've only glanced at the volumes briefly, but even the table of contents looks interesting, so I'm putting it at the front of my "To Read" list.

Once we have a better idea of how history played out, and we can agree on the most likely string of events, we have to figure out a way to bridge the religion gap. Ideally, by altogether ditching the current set of fabricated religions aimed at divorcing humanity from nature, but if that doesn't seem feasible, then convincing Europe's invading force that we have awakened from our slumber, and we see our common enemy. If this does not happen, the pacifist version of the "Live and let live", "Treat others the way you want to be treated" reformed Christianity will get overwhelmed by the militant and supremacist (as the terms kafirs, infidels indicate) Islam. And no, Atheism will not save the day.

We have our work cut out for us.

 

[JWW427]

"Once we have a better idea of how history played out, and we can agree on the most likely string of events, we have to figure out a way to bridge the religion gap."


We do have an idea. A. pretty clear one.
Forget bridging any religious gaps, thats a fruitless endeavor.
If you read the many posts on SH you might get an idea of how a lot of events may have played out in favor of the Nazi Party and its escaped minions. WW2 just sort of ended. The Allies "sort of" won.
Russia lost 27 million people. (Some say 35). The Allies? One million if that.

• Germany was 100% rebuilt to stave off Russian incursion, but that wasn't the only reason. Just look at their car companies, military weapon sales, and banks today. In the 1950's and 60s, VW sales around the world were in the millions. (Porsche AG).
Was Italy or Japan rebuilt to this standard? No. Ask yourself why.

• The UK and America benefitted greatly from Project Paperclip technology and scientists.

• Swiss gold reserves under the OCTOGON Group benefitted Nazis in Argentina.

• The Cold War was mostly BS, but kept the world order circling around the USA/USSR conflict.

• Big banks made out like bandits. 1940-present.

• Corporations and military contractors made money in many countries, especially Germany, Russia, and America. 1945-present.

• A good case can be made for a "Fourth Reich" in America starting in 1952.

• The Space Race was all about Cold War politics and most likely UFO technology hidden behind public space programs.

On and on...


• As for the "H. H. Asquith Letters to Venetia Stanley"
Good luck finding bits of genuine truth in any books or archived letters. The PTB have carefully managed the truth of WW2. They have micromanaged every scrap of evidence. They have put out countless books whose authors are sadly misinformed by mainstream sources, or were on the Cabal payroll. Or they were blackmailed.
Anything close to the truth will only be found in alternative books and videos on the subject.

Who really won the war? I don't think anyone really did.

 

[irishbalt]

Great post, as usual! I slightly disagree, though, based solely on my opinion, when you refer to the forces commanding the nazis having worked only to create such chaos and then giving up to ensure their own loss. I am very hopeful that they were really trying their best for their people. Wouldn't it be so far fetched to believe that it was all a huge play?

This came up as criticism before. Maybe I should go deeper into that topic, as I have some hints showing that it was pre-planned.

After watching the American political process play out this year. Would it be so surprising if A.H. did "take a fall" like a boxer in the ring with his managers betting he would loose? Remember A.H. was against the monarch in Austria,similar to another group that had been taking down European Christian governments accross the Continent. Not that those governments did not need to be reformed, but that the reforms this group brought in were MUCH MUCH more destructive and long lasting.

This Germania thread is an EXCELLENT well researched and very important subject because the playbook DOES NOT CHANGE. It is likely the same playbook, generation to generation. Government after government.

"Once we have a better idea of how history played out, and we can agree on the most likely string of events, we have to figure out a way to bridge the religion gap."


We do have an idea. A. pretty clear one.
Forget bridging any religious gaps, thats a fruitless endeavor.
If you read the many posts on SH you might get an idea of how a lot of events may have played out in favor of the Nazi Party and its escaped minions. WW2 just sort of ended. The Allies "sort of" won.
Russia lost 27 million people. (Some say 35). The Allies? One million if that.

• Germany was 100% rebuilt to stave off Russian incursion, but that wasn't the only reason. Just look at their car companies, military weapon sales, and banks today. In the 1950's and 60s, VW sales around the world were in the millions. (Porsche AG).
Was Italy or Japan rebuilt to this standard? No. Ask yourself why.

• The UK and America benefitted greatly from Project Paperclip technology and scientists.

• Swiss gold reserves under the OCTOGON Group benefitted Nazis in Argentina.

• The Cold War was mostly BS, but kept the world order circling around the USA/USSR conflict.

• Big banks made out like bandits. 1940-present.

• Corporations and military contractors made money in many countries, especially Germany, Russia, and America. 1945-present.

• A good case can be made for a "Fourth Reich" in America starting in 1952.

• The Space Race was all about Cold War politics and most likely UFO technology hidden behind public space programs.

On and on...


• As for the "H. H. Asquith Letters to Venetia Stanley"
Good luck finding bits of genuine truth in any books or archived letters. The PTB have carefully managed the truth of WW2. They have micromanaged every scrap of evidence. They have put out countless books whose authors are sadly misinformed by mainstream sources, or were on the Cabal payroll. Or they were blackmailed.
Anything close to the truth will only be found in alternative books and videos on the subject.

Who really won the war? I don't think anyone really did.

Thank you, this is intelligent commentary.

 

[Golden Stag]

"Once we have a better idea of how history played out, and we can agree on the most likely string of events, we have to figure out a way to bridge the religion gap."

We do have an idea. A. pretty clear one.

You say this, but...

If you read the many posts on SH you might get an idea of how a lot of events may have played out in favor of the Nazi Party and its escaped minions. WW2 just sort of ended. The Allies "sort of" won.

WW2 didn't just sort of end, and the defenders in the last battles of the war, were they alive today, would likely be pretty insulted by such a nonchalant statement. This article on Siege of Budapest describes in painstaking detail how the last real battle of the war transpired, and its ramifications. I'd like to include few excerpts from the article, if I may:

For Adolf Hitler, Budapest was vital. It was the capital of Germany’s last remaining ally in Europe and the gateway to Vienna and southern Bavaria. In addition, the Axis’ only remaining crude oil plant was in southwest Hungary.
[...]
The German Ninth SS Mountain Corps, under the command of SS Obergruppenführer (Lt. Gen.) Karl von Pfeffer-Wildenbruch, a police general sent to Hungary in September 1944, was trapped in Budapest. The garrison consisted of roughly seventy thousand German and Hungarian soldiers. Troop quality ranged from excellent to substandard. Comprising the core of the garrison were several first-class German fighting units, including most of the Feldherrnhalle Panzergrenadier Division, the depleted Thirteenth Panzer Division, the Eighth SS Cavalry Division, and the recently formed Twenty-second SS Maria Theresa Cavalry Division.
[...]
On December 24, 1944, Hitler, over the heated objections of much of his staff, ordered SS Obergruppenführer (Lt. Gen.) Herbert Gille to immediately prepare his formidable Fourth SS Panzer Corps, then refitting in the Warsaw area, for deployment to Hungary to relieve the encircled German corps in Budapest. Thus began the disproportionate buildup of German panzer forces in Hungary during a period of extreme peril on both the Eastern and Western fronts. By March 1945 six elite Waffen SS panzer divisions and a quarter of all available Wehrmacht panzer divisions would be committed to Hungary, ostensibly to retain the Reich’s last remaining strategic oil reserves.
[...]
An eyewitness described the chaos:

"The bombing was constant. It was very dangerous to go outside. Many people died while running for water, or just going to the courtyard for a cigarette. We went down into the cellar on December 29 and until the fall of Buda on February 12, we lived a rat’s life."
[...]
Both sides recognized that the Battle of Budapest was developing into the bloodiest and most sustained siege since Stalingrad.
[...]
A brief orgy of horror and violence ensued in Buda after its capture. An estimated two thousand wounded were burned or suffocated to death in fires that broke out in the catacombs under the Royal Palace. Soviet soldiers plundered, looted, and raped the populace. Occupation troops rounded up all able-bodied Hungarian men and youth and sent them down to the Danube to build pontoon bridges across the river. For weeks afterward, especially after the spring thaw, bloated bodies piled up against these same pontoons and bridge pylons.
[...]
Budapest lay in ruins. Thousands of structures were destroyed or damaged. The distinctive Parliament building and Royal Palace were gutted, and all five of the city’s unique and graceful bridges lay broken in the Danube.
[...]
There is an epilogue to Budapest’s fall. Hitler committed significant reserves to Hungary, including the battered Sixth SS Panzer Army fresh from the Ardennes counteroffensive. Consisting of four of the most battle-hardened Waffen SS Panzer units, including the dreaded Leibstandarte and Das Reich divisions, this formidable force was squandered in early March during an ill-conceived panzer ‘death ride’ into waiting and well-prepared Soviet anti-tank defenses near Lake Balaton.

Handily defeated by the now highly proficient Soviets, this reverse of Hitler’s best divisions finally broke German resistance in Hungary. Within a month Vienna had fallen. The war in Europe ended three weeks later.

The last pocket of resistance held out bitterly to the very end, and well after their resources were depleted did the house of cards come toppling down.

Russia lost 27 million people. (Some say 35). The Allies? One million if that.

The Russian casualty numbers are no doubt greatly inflated. I wouldn't be surprised if that magical 6 million suffering in Eastern Europe, whom the MSM wrote about constantly since the early 1900s, were included in that number. The victims of Holodomor are probably in there, too.

The lack of Allied losses, however, should be an indication that war against the West was never an objective of the Reich. The same cannot be said in reverse.

• Germany was 100% rebuilt to stave off Russian incursion, but that wasn't the only reason. Just look at their car companies, military weapon sales, and banks today. In the 1950's and 60s, VW sales around the world were in the millions. (Porsche AG).
Was Italy or Japan rebuilt to this standard? No. Ask yourself why.

Japan was most definitely rebuilt, and like Germany ended up as a pinnacle of high-tech in the far east. Where do you think brands like: Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Suzuki, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Mazda, Lexus, Infinity, Acura, Yamaha, Kawasaki, Bridgestone, Yokohama, Sony, Panasonic, Canon, Toshiba, Nikon, Fujitsu, Hitachi, Sharp, Seiko, Citizen, Epson, JVC, Maxell, Pioneer, Casio, Kenwood, TDK and Sanyo came from? There are more brands I did not care to include listed here. A lot of these brands were known world-wide by the 80s. This was similar to the South Korean money injection, though much smaller in scale, that resulted in sub-standard brands like Samsung, LG, Daewoo, Kia, Hyundai and the like.

As for Italy, that's a different matter. I would lump Italy with the rest of the Mediterranean nations who are circling around bankruptcy to this day. Some economists colloquially refer to this collection of nations as the PIGS countries (for Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain), and I believe the aim of destabilizing these nations is so the nice coastal lands could be purchased by the elite for pennies on the dollar. Tuscany comes to mind right off the bat, but I'm sure locals can provide more examples of seaside mansions, very obviously not owned by locals, littering their landscape.

• The UK and America benefitted greatly from Project Paperclip technology and scientists.
• Big banks made out like bandits. 1940-present.
• Corporations and military contractors made money in many countries, especially Germany, Russia, and America. 1945-present.

100% agree with the above, my only comment relating to Operation Paperclip is that those scientists most likely didn't have much of a choice in moving overseas, so the assumption of them going willingly to join their "masters" may be folly. What do you think would have happened to them if they said they were not going to the US, and instead were going to help rebuild their nation?

• Swiss gold reserves under the OCTOGON Group benefitted Nazis in Argentina.
• A good case can be made for a "Fourth Reich" in America starting in 1952.

This is where the slippery slope really starts. I've only heard of the Argentinian Nazis in passing from a cousin a few years ago, who saw some show about it on The Discovery Channel, and dismissed it as just an oddity at the time. I've not heard of this Octagon Group or Switzerland until now, but having spent a few of hours last night to look into it just made my head spin. This South African doctorate of history, when he wasn't assembling various shapes out of triangles to prove how various historical symbols were related, kept going on about Swiss Roman Nazi Pharoahic Templar Freemasons of the Octagon, who were also somehow related to the Whores of Babylon.

You know what I didn't hear him utter a single word about? You guessed it, the Talmudic Babylonian Bankers, the Federal Reserve, and the like. Not a single word. The only time Jews came up was when he explained how they weren't responsible for 9/11, because apparently they're too blabby and can't keep a secret. On my initial search for the "Octagon Group" this Benjamin dude kept popping up in the search results related to it, so I had to amend my search term with "-Benjamin" to explicitly exclude those results. When I searched for Switzerland financing Hitler, guess whose articles popped up? The ADL and Fox News, among others. IMO, if we're looking for alternate sources for possible theories, anything that The Discovery Channel, Fox News or the ADL propagates does not quality.

I could list a dozen contradictions from that guy's presentation, but this is neither the time nor the place for it. I'll see if I can find less of a shill as a source to continue the research and post my thoughts on a related thread, but currently this very much smells like a psyop to me. Regardless, before we try to figure out the next steps, we should figure out who this invisible enemy is. Is it the Pharoahic Nazis or the Talmudic bankers, or are they one and the same? Ugh, that just made my head spin again.

• The Cold War was mostly BS, but kept the world order circling around the USA/USSR conflict.
• The Space Race was all about Cold War politics and most likely UFO technology hidden behind public space programs.

On and on...

No comment on these, merely that the Cold War definitely looked different from the other side of the Wall / Iron Curtain, and even when these nations regained their so-called freedom, they still remain 2nd class citizen, at best, of the European Union. There's a cynical saying in Hungarian for the "liberation" of the East that goes something like this: "Out go the tanks, in come the banks". From one trap, right into another. Then again, isn't this the same Standard Operating Procedure for basically every Western intervention of the last century? If we want to talk about something that "just sorta happened", the way the Wall and the Iron Curtain dropped from one day to the next would be an excellent topic for another thread.

• As for the "H. H. Asquith Letters to Venetia Stanley"
Good luck finding bits of genuine truth in any books or archived letters. The PTB have carefully managed the truth of WW2. They have micromanaged every scrap of evidence. They have put out countless books whose authors are sadly misinformed by mainstream sources, or were on the Cabal payroll. Or they were blackmailed.
Anything close to the truth will only be found in alternative books and videos on the subject.

Who really won the war? I don't think anyone really did.

I'll definitely start expanding my reading material on the forums, but the reason I brought up those 2 titles is because they were cited by a researcher during one of his lectures as presenting a different angle of WWI. This guy has spent decades of his life researching the World Wars, and given that these sources were both British Prime Ministers whom the MSM has tried to discredit of late, makes them even more intriguing. Unlike stories airing on Discovery Channel, the collection of letters in particular remained in private hands until years after Asquith's death (1928), and I assume until after her death, too (1948). To me, this qualifies as an alternate source that may have avoided the purge, and that it specifically talks about contents of some documents that were destroyed during/after WW1 is just cherry on the cake.

Forget bridging any religious gaps, thats a fruitless endeavor.

I don't think you can "fight a war" while your backyard is on fire. Metaphorically speaking, of course.

 

[JWW427]

Stag

You are correct on the Japanese build-up by the US, but Germany was still the #1 priority due to the Iron Curtain issue and the many Nazis in power in the US in corporate and banking positions. See any Japanese names at NASA, USA military contractor corporations, banks, or on any corporate boards after the war? Nope. But there were many German ones. So it could be said that the Nazis "sort of won" too.
By 1946, the word was out to hire ex-Nazis to counter the Soviets, not hunt them down.

I most certainly do NOT get my information from the Discovery Channel. All media is controlled by the PTB.
I read books and calculate dots to the best of my ability. Info versus disinformation. Fabrications versus our perceived reality.
If you don't like my theories and postulations argue with the authors. Argue with the lectures. Argue with retired military personnel of high rank. I never say I know anything 100%. Not ever.
Do you?

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on many points, but thats the idea of this forum. Intellectual debate.
If you cant see the connections between Switzerland and Nazi treasure via OCTOGON (Not Oct-a-gon), I don't know what to say. That information is obscure and highly suppressed. A lot of it is NOT on the internet. However, why did Germany never occupy Switzerland in any war? Even going back to the Franco-Prussian War? Its a bank for many Euro powers, a private one that goes back to the Templars founding that nation in 1241. A big threat to the Vatican Bank.
Under Mount Cervin via a hotel, you can actually see piles of gold in a tunnel, if you know the right people. There are thousands of those tunnels apparently.

If you connect a Templar cross with lines you get a proper octagon. The secret group spelled the name with an "O." Ben Fulford is a good source on this, but he spelled it wrong. He's also an admitted Asian secret society member, so be cautious, but my military and intel contacts here in DC say he's legit on most things.

As for liberal MP HH Asquith, a drunk and womanizer bar none, I suspect his passionate letters to Venetia may contain general gripes pertaining to the Conservatives, Lords, and the military commanders who were bent on warmongering (Gallipoli and such). I salute his liberal policies, but as a middle class politician he would be controlled by the monarchy and secret societies just like today, even if he was unaware of it. If there were some hot alternative tidbits on the war, radical ones, they were most likely scissored out many decades ago since I believe most publishers are corrupt. Venetia was a member of the British Aristicracy, therefore she may have been a spy for them. I doubt old Asquith had anything pithy to say on the Thule or Vril Societies, the role of the occult, or the deeper machinations of powerful men and banks behind the First World War.
Why are ALL of her reply letters to him missing? I find that very suspicious. Still, the book might be interesting reading if a bit one sided.

If you want a heated ego-filled debate on WW2 please PM me, but kindly read all my posts before doing so. The folks on this forum have great things to say when they respond to anyone's threads. I have learned MUCH from them. My ideas mean nothing without their input.


Who won WW2? The banks and the escaped Nazis in my opinion. Everyone. No one.
The war was too big and convoluted for a simple answer, much of it is still highly classified, but the topic continues to shed light by the day via certain fringe authors and historians whom I respect. Mainstream accounts should all be questioned with a very discerning eye. It took me 35 years to get any idea of the whys, hows, and the many agendas laid bare for those like us here on SH who have the eyes to really see.
I'll stick to my guns. The Allies "sort of" won. Its not a nonchalant answer, its an honest one.

Peter Levenda is conservative, and is not a conspiracy theorist but a journalist. For further reading I suggest:

View: https://www.amazon.com/Unholy-Alliance-History-Involvement-Expanded/dp/0892541903/ref=sr_1_3?dchild=1&keywords=Peter+levenda&qid=1612302246&sr=8-3

 

[matematik]

I was reading Scottish historian L.A. Waddell recently, and he basically argues that Britain, including both the English and Celts, was founded by King Brutus who was a Phoenician, and that all the ancient stone inscriptions around Britain can be translated using Phoenician. His view seems to be that both English and the Celtic languages derive from the same Phoenician origin and arrived in Britain at the same time.

He also makes the interesting argument that it was not the "Germanics" who brought the Germanic/English language to Britain from the Continent, but rather the ancient British (Phoenicians) who colonised Germany from Britain and imposed their language on the people who would later be known as Germanics/Germans. He claims that ancient chronicles state that King Ebraucus lead an invasion of Germany from Britain in about 970 BC. What are peoples' thoughts on that?

 

[Ludendorff]

National Socialism was supposed to destroy Germany from within from the very beginning.

great thread. gave me a lot to think about.
I recommend reading General Erich Ludendorffs books on the topic especially "Destruction of Freemasonry through Revelation of the Secrets". He was a high ranking German nationalist and general who identified Judaism as the main enemy of not just the Germans but also all other "pagan nations" aka goyim. He saw the only solution for the German people to accept their Germanic heritage and reject the christian doctrine both catholic and protestant (which are an extension off judaism) as well as freemasonry which is also based on the old testament seeking to rebuild salomons temple.
Hitler saw the same problem and Ludendorff helped him come to power. After Hitler was in power all lodges and synagogue were closed.
Point being: The German elite most likely had the right intentions and knew the enemy very well - nowadays they work for zion obviously.
The national socialists also promoted the ancient Germanic culture (swastika, runes, etc.) to counter judeo-christian culture and were very interested in the Aryan history and the occult (Thule society, Himalayan expedition, Antarctica etc.). Unfortunately their supposed English and American Aryan brothers backstabbed them as they had been usurped much earlier before.
The winners write history.

 

[Goddo.F]

In the beginning of the 20th Century, the last monarchies got dismantled within Europe. being replaced by concept of modern politics and democracy. This created the counter-movement of traditionalism, which the Vatican used to impose Fascism.

... it only seems this way, the dismantling i mean ... until you uncover the members of unelected powerful institutions like the EU Parliament, Governors of Reserve Bank, Chairmen of global corporations etc. The old royal families are right there ... hidden in plain sight. See the following as examples :
Henri, Grand Duke of Luxembourg - Wikipedia
Karl von Habsburg - Wikipedia
Hans Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza - Wikipedia (notice the name JOHN KERRY in the intro !!!!)
Louis Alphonse de Bourbon - Wikipedia (notice connection to Gen Franco and BNP Paribas)
also have a look at how Andorra is set-up ... co-ruled by the Vatican and 'princes of state'

surely we must be super critical when asked to believe that, after thousands of years of rule and power, these monarchies were peacefully dismantled and the monarchs simply melted into the general population to quietly live out their lives in opulence, remembering the 'good old days' !

I might be in the minority here, but I think he was a false messiah.

Ah ... yes, don't ALL politicians eventually reveal their feet of clay ?? Trump ? yes even Mandela !!! Biden ? ... shame he struggles with his socks let alone the feet of clay. Putin too. They over-rate themselves (cf Trudeau-x), play games at our expense. All their statues eventually are toppled !

 

[Frits]

The goal was to create a guilt complex in the German population so that Germany would never again be able to connect with its history of old. Violent re-education has created a kind of psychological barrier in the Germans that suppresses any genuine historical awareness of the time before the 20th century. Due to the collective traumatization in the 1st and especially the 2nd World War, the Germans are almost completely cut off from their cultural past.

There is a Book "Report Of Committee Alleged German Outrages" which is full of lies to demonize the Germans during WWI.
But it Is interesting to read, because the tactics described are copied over and over again.