SH Archive The Titanic was a Ritual Sacrifice

[KD Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-18 14:35:58
Reaction Score: 1

And what could be the purpose of faking the sinking of the Titanic?

 

[wizz33]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: wizz33
Date: 2018-07-18 18:58:44
Reaction Score: 1

Federal reserve

 

[KD Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-18 19:07:37
Reaction Score: 0

Federal reserve

Could you please elaborate a bit?

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: humanoidlord
Date: 2018-07-19 01:53:48
Reaction Score: 0

And what could be the purpose of faking the sinking of the Titanic?

muddling up your history

 

[Whitewave]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-07-19 05:47:27
Reaction Score: 1

Could you please elaborate a bit?

I believe what wizz33 is referring to is the deaths of most of those opposed to having a Federal Reserve. Most of the opposition was on the Titanic when it sank. Don't mean to speak for you wizz33 so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

 

[KD Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-19 08:00:32
Reaction Score: 1

It just appears there are much easier ways to silence people other than sinking a ship. Then again, may be getting them in the same place and handling everybody at the same time makes more sense Grim.

 

[wizz33]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: wizz33
Date: 2018-07-19 11:17:49
Reaction Score: 0

I believe what wizz33 is referring to is the deaths of most of those opposed to having a Federal Reserve. Most of the opposition was on the Titanic when it sank. Don't mean to speak for you wizz33 so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

it is good

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-07-19 11:53:23
Reaction Score: 2

it is good

Then they added insult to injury by putting andrew jackson on the 20.

 

[Whitewave]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-07-19 14:37:22
Reaction Score: 3

It just appears there are much easier ways to silence people other than sinking a ship. Then again, may be getting them in the same place and handling everybody at the same time makes more sense Grim.

Well, if you buy the theory that the Titanic was swapped out for the Olympic (evidence seems pretty convincing) then sinking the "Titanic" killed 2 birds with one stone, so to speak.

 

[KD Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-19 14:42:32
Reaction Score: 1

There was a pretty good article where small differences between the two kinda demonstrate that there was no swap. Looked pretty convincing. Then again, right?

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-07-19 15:27:34
Reaction Score: 1

There was a pretty good article where small differences between the two kinda demonstrate that there was no swap. Looked pretty convincing. Then again, right?

Not convinced by that. More convinced by the conflicting evidence. Such as travelers on board noticing a pronounced list to port (which the Olympic had due to its bent keel). Porthole counts have been used on both sides of the argument, and adverts and marketing used photos interchangeably (primarily only the one ship, which one is anyones guess), and just labeled as whichever ship they wanted to.

 

[KD Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-19 16:21:45
Reaction Score: 1

I believe either way is possible. I am far from being educated on the swap. If the sole purpose of it was the insurance fraud, it’s somewhat outside of my boundaries. The story is fascinating though.

Especially given the time frame of the events being pre 1920. I’m wondering if there is something of true essence hiding behind.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-07-19 17:35:17
Reaction Score: 2

I'm intrigued by the ritual sacrifice aspect, but would like more to go on than just the presence of Kali(fornia)
Thoroughly convinced of the insurance fraud aspect, I have debunked the debunking I could find. Lloyds Did pay out, it was not self insured.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Spykgb
Date: 2018-10-02 10:46:35
Reaction Score: 3

There is lots of Evidence in this clip that it was an Insurance scam but the passengers were not supposed to die

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-10-02 13:59:20
Reaction Score: 0

There is lots of Evidence in this clip that it was an Insurance scam but the passengers were not supposed to die

Without watching the clip, that was my thought as well. Passengers, except a select few, were not meant to die. Doesn't fit well with the sacrifice theory.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Ice Nine
Date: 2018-10-02 14:11:36
Reaction Score: 5

Looks like they enjoyed jumping the gun back then. Or may be not. There is a plausible explanation for everything out there.

View attachment 4648View attachment 4649View attachment 4650View attachment 4651

Hmmmm....this reminds me of when the BBC announced the "collapse" of WTC building 7, 20 minutes before it happened.

This leads me to the conclusion that the Titanic was not suppose to sink, but opps! something went terribly wrong with the plan.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: mythstifieD
Date: 2018-10-15 04:58:32
Reaction Score: 1

There is lots of Evidence in this clip that it was an Insurance scam but the passengers were not supposed to die

There is absolutely no way that the Olympic and Titanic got switched. Footage of the wreck clearly shows the upper deck matches the distinct look of the Titanic.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-10-15 09:42:13
Reaction Score: 3

There is absolutely no way that the Olympic and Titanic got switched. Footage of the wreck clearly shows the upper deck matches the distinct look of the Titanic.

How do you know which was which? They used the photos and names interchangeably.

 

[Whitewave]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-10-15 15:13:45
Reaction Score: 3

Funny how both ships are named after the original earth beings: Titans and Olympians. Not really pertaining to Titanic's sinking-just thought it was interesting.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Bear Claw
Date: 2019-01-05 21:12:34
Reaction Score: 9

Hi everyone, first post on this forum, so, I hope that you are all well, and had a great Christmas and New Year!

I didn't see it mentioned in the thread, although as you all seem pretty well read I guess it hasn't passed you all by. If its old hat, just treat this as an intro post!

Anyway about 14 years before the Titanic sank, a writer called Morgan Robertson published a book called Futility / the wreck of the Titan. It basically was a novella detailing an old school Ocean Liner of a similar ilk to Titanic (author was quite maritime savvy) called Titan, which hit an iceberg navigating the North Atlantic. There were a number of similarities to both Titan and Titanic, beyond the name. The boats were of similar size and tonnage, both were described as unsinkable, and both described as the largest boat, and the greatest achievement of men, neither had enough lifeboats, plus a number of other less significant correlations.

I am not sold on predictive programming, but also intrigued by the concept.

Would a blood sacrifice not require blood however? Drowning seems a relatively bloodless way to go... not trying to be a pedant...