The True History of the American Civil War (War of Rebellion)

[Magnetic]

The narrative provided by the "historians" of the American Civil War doesn't add up. Tens of thousands of soldiers engaged in massive battles with casualties we are told. A long war with many fronts yet there are no photographs of actual battles and instead have drawings not photographs of the action. We have photographs from the 1860's in America but they are not of the greatest war in history going on at the same time. A few staged photographs of dead Southern "soldiers" who are dressed in civilian clothes. The War did not take place as given and instead it was a genocide of the South by the banking elite of the North. Union soldiers moved in and killed hundreds of hundreds of thousands of Southerners. It was a genocide like all the genocides that came later except this one was hushed up by the victors. The South had little resources to stop the bankers/elite from the North from ripping the land from them and killing a half million or more Southern civilians. This is what happened. The land was stolen and resources plundered by the northern banking elite and their minions. Where did the orphans come from in the late 1860's and 1870's? They were children of the genocided South. As property of the victors they were displaced to the four corners of America to be used as indentured workers on farms and on manufacturing sites. Those who participated in the mass extermination of fellow Americans had demons lurking in their souls and some wanted to tell the truth about what happened, luckily there were "Insane Asylums" springing up everywhere in deserted places where these tortured souls could be isolated, locked away, and killed if need be, to keep the secret from reaching the masses. I had intimated before that giant battles did not occur and there was a takeover of the South and there may have been small skirmishes but nothing like the scale portrayed in the "History" books. Archaix recently noticed the same things that I did and he added the genocide explanation, the orphan trains and Insane Asylums explanations. He is speculating of course but it appears to fit the real discernable facts as we know them. These explanations are explosive to the foundation of traditional historical narratives and have profound implications for our relationship here in America to the banking elites who control the country. This is a work in progress and we do not have "perfect" information about what happened but the veil is being lifted. I would suggest watching his video based on an 1955 book on the Civil War and his speculations and implications of the lack of real evidence of the war.

 

[Nexus7]

Just shortly my opinion... this war looks like another managed war... WW2 was 100% "managed" or "staged" and Napoleonic and WW1 were also very probable managed too. At least partly... but WW2 certainly seemed to follow a script which includes ridiculous decissions by both Ger and Jpn.
Even if OT eg. I doubt this whole Yamamoto as IJN genius navy planner narrative, in fact most of his plans sucked. But these guys were not stupid so must have been on purpose (same with German "warplans"). But Yamamoto was in the US and the UK for longer time.... probably he learned there to make these "mistakes" But other officers of the Japanese (or Germans) were not much better...

I mean how stupid can professional soldiers / officers be? Look at the so called "mistakes" the losers of WW2 made....those were not real mistakes imho.

And the same is true here.. however my sympathy is ofc with the south. Sadly I guess they either were "in on it" (I mean their leaders!) or were undermined later by some serious (northern) agents posing as (southern) generals... I clearly remember the falls of the Missisippi forts in case of the ACW as such strange "mistakes". But the list of unbelievable WW2 "mistakes" is much longer ofc
Other examples but on the northern side: a) Gen Mc Clellan - has many more soldiers and artillery pieces then the south but does not attack b) Gen Meade - "won" battle of Gettyburgh but does not follow up and pursues the fleeing southerners. So these 2 officers alone delayed the northern win for perhaps 2 years (cause the script said so?)...could some of these big battles be staged ? Perhaps... yes there is a lack of footage of the carnage

 

[Magnetic]

Just shortly my opinion... this war looks like another managed war... WW2 was 100% "managed" or "staged" and Napoleonic and WW1 were also very probable managed too. At least partly... but WW2 certainly seemed to follow a script which includes ridiculous decissions by both Ger and Jpn.
Even if OT eg. I doubt this whole Yamamoto as IJN genius navy planner narrative, in fact most of his plans sucked. But these guys were not stupid so must have been on purpose (same with German "warplans"). But Yamamoto was in the US and the UK for longer time.... probably he learned there to make these "mistakes" But other officers of the Japanese (or Germans) were not much better...

I mean how stupid can professional soldiers / officers be? Look at the so called "mistakes" the losers of WW2 made....those were not real mistakes imho.

And the same is true here.. however my sympathy is ofc with the south. Sadly I guess they either were "in on it" (I mean their leaders!) or were undermined later by some serious (northern) agents posing as (southern) generals... I clearly remember the falls of the Missisippi forts in case of the ACW as such strange "mistakes". But the list of unbelievable WW2 "mistakes" is much longer ofc
Other examples but on the northern side: a) Gen Mc Clellan - has many more soldiers and artillery pieces then the south but does not attack b) Gen Meade - "won" battle of Gettyburgh but does not follow up and pursues the fleeing southerners. So these 2 officers alone delayed the northern win for perhaps 2 years (cause the script said so?)...could some of these big battles be staged ? Perhaps... yes there is a lack of footage of the carnage

The narrative itself was staged. We know the Union had photographers because they photographed themselves for posterity. There are no photos of the battlefields after the battle with thousands of corpses, dead horses and burned houses. There are no photos of any battle at all. There are a few photos of General Lee but most show him post mortem with a iron stand behind him to hold his lifeless corpse up for the photo! Lincoln himself looks like Jefferson Davis! One character may be posing for both roles as in a play with different makeup, clothes and camera angles. His assassination is staged during a play! It's all stagecraft although more easily seen though because we are used to media deceptions here. Nature abhors a vacuum so the written narratives were given in great detail to fill it. Does this mean nothing happened? Of course not. It just means the narratives of a "Just War" from each side are concocted in whole to paint a noble enterprise instead of of a massacre of the Southern white population and a transference to the black folks who lived there which the bankers then had loans given to them that they forfeited on and then the bankers repossessed the land. White southern children were used to jack start the "Industrial Revolution" by being made to work in factories and as farm laborers as Orphan Train passengers. The Insane asylums located in isolated areas took care of the US Army soldiers forced to kill in the conquest that could not keep it together. If one wants to show a similar War then look at the Boer War the English fought against the Dutch farmers in South Africa. Early in the war the Boer farmers used terrain and stealth to defeat English military small formations but then the English put captured Boer women and children in camps where many perished and genocided the Boer until they surrendered. The American South was genocided from the very beginning of the conflict by the Northern banking elite to reduce their ability to resist to zero.

 

[polymath]

My father was named after his great grandfather who was an enlisted Confederate soldier. I take away five things from his experience:
1. Although his family owned a decent amount of land in Tennessee and farmed, they owned no slaves.
2. He was one of 4 brothers. One of whom wore the Union uniform and the other three wore the Confederate. The three were estranged afterward from him and their families never knew each other, nor their descendants.
EDIT: this is why I always had such a hard time with the "it was over slavery" reasoning. None of these four had skin in the slavery game. It seems more like the division within families over the D'emic. I wonder if it was that type of psychological warfare and its' aftermath. Why would brothers turn on each other to fight for/against a practice that wasn't even their own? I do know that the Union brother became a government man afterward and the others went back to their previous lives.
3. My 2x great grandfather had enlisted in 1862 and had his portrait made in his uniform in rural Tennessee. Which makes it seem very odd when there are no photos of other, more important people.
4. The Colonel that was in charge of his regiment was very, very young in my opinion. He was also an epileptic. His story is here: Colonel James Moses White
5. My 2x great grandfather decided to go home and quit the war according to formal records. He wasn't getting paid to battle (or LARP?) and decided to go back to his farm life.

 

[alltheleaves]

1928A.D. War Department issues Field Training Manual 2000-25 on Citizenship and how to return to a Republican form of Constitutional government from a Democracy. General Douglas MacArthurstudies under this manual.
1932A.D. Franklin Delano Roosevelt ordersthe Training Manual 2000-25 and all negative references to a Democracy destroyed with no explanation.

The manual...

1928A.D. War Department issues Field Training Manual 2000-25 on Citizenship.

 

[Otto_Didactic]

I have done extensive research on the Civil War and photographers Matthew Brady , T. O'Sullivan and A. Gardner, and Lincoln. America was already in ruins and the war was invented to dismiss the ghost cities and destruction. Lincoln was a fictional character. Here is the latest installment about Gettysburg battle and Lincolns address. I got more on the website about Richmond and Lincolns assassination and the fake public execution images. Lincoln and the Civil War are Media Creations. Out of Place Artifacts: Gettysburg Cemetery Arch

I have done extensive research on the Civil War and photographers Matthew Brady , T. O'Sullivan and A. Gardner, and Lincoln. America was already in ruins and the war was invented to dismiss the ghost cities and destruction. Lincoln was a fictional character. Here is the latest installment about Gettysburg battle and Lincolns address. I got more on the website about Richmond and Lincolns assassination and the fake public execution images. Lincoln and the Civil War are Media Creations. Out of Place Artifacts: Gettysburg Cemetery Arch

Here are the ancient ruins of Richmond The Civil War Cover Story for the Great Reset: Richmond Ruins and more about Lincoln Abe Lincoln and the Fake Founding Fathers
Heres another good one about the westward expansion, it was the same photographers named used that shot the hangings and much of the civil war, Sullivan, Gardner, Bell were the main photographers to do the survey expeditions, all funded by Lincoln, who never existed. its pretty good. Talks about the fake World Heritage sites of the pueblos and cliff dwellings. Westward Expansion and World Heritage Frauds, Chaco Canyon and Mesa Verde.

 

[Nexus7]

The narrative itself was staged. .....

Yes, I basically agree with your overview post.I guess most can agree that the "Northern industrialists and bankers, masons, jesuits" were the agressors. But this lack of photos is really strange. But what is more disturbing (even if OT a bit) is almost the same lack of film and photos (from which some seem staged) for bigger WW2 battles. There should be dozens of films showing eg. how the Allies mowed down the Japanese "Banzai" charges... as well a hundred vids/films from the eastern front when Germans mowed down the Russians...(and later the other way around) but alone the MG42 is such a killermachine ( I shot the MG3 in the Bundeswehr in the 90ties) that there must have been basically heaps of bloody and dismembered corpses. Ok, this is NOT "appetizing" - one can argue so it was not filmed to spare the population of the horrors of war.... but for sure it was filmed severall times. It might not have been released to the public tho.... I remember when YT was not censored totally "back in the days" there were videos showing eg. the ardennes offensive pointing out no footage of real battles/carnage... and some of the dead looked also fake in pics...oh well...

Ah this one channel who says he is in the tradition of Dave J. is still active... he said he wanted to end his channel... but he made lots of new stuff I noticed. However here are 3 of his vids relating to this thread. But take this as entertainment...I am not sure if he is right ofc.

The hidden civil war hand:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqUukCSVvNI

Vid abt "simmilar actors" (note this might be fantasy do not flame me for it )

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4KHnL1WBgM

Abt Gen Custer and Little Big Horn Battle (fake?? this also said M. Mathis iirc)

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U305tmDEZlQ

 

[Magnetic]

I have done extensive research on the Civil War and photographers Matthew Brady , T. O'Sullivan and A. Gardner, and Lincoln. America was already in ruins and the war was invented to dismiss the ghost cities and destruction. Lincoln was a fictional character. Here is the latest installment about Gettysburg battle and Lincolns address. I got more on the website about Richmond and Lincolns assassination and the fake public execution images. Lincoln and the Civil War are Media Creations. Out of Place Artifacts: Gettysburg Cemetery Arch

Here are the ancient ruins of Richmond The Civil War Cover Story for the Great Reset: Richmond Ruins and more about Lincoln Abe Lincoln and the Fake Founding Fathers
Heres another good one about the westward expansion, it was the same photographers named used that shot the hangings and much of the civil war, Sullivan, Gardner, Bell were the main photographers to do the survey expeditions, all funded by Lincoln, who never existed. its pretty good. Talks about the fake World Heritage sites of the pueblos and cliff dwellings. Westward Expansion and World Heritage Frauds, Chaco Canyon and Mesa Verde.

I highly recommend your website and I do agree that the many cities of the south were decimated long before the "Civil War" broke out. I am leaning toward your theses that all of the characters in the play were fake but I think the Union did take over the South. I am leaning toward an attack by Northern Industrialists/bankers overwhelming the agrarian south. Since they had little industrial strength(destroyed cities, ports, factories, etc), they were easily subjugated by Union armies of thugs and usurpers over time. I think it was a guerilla resistance by the South and a scorched earth/genicidal approach was used by the Union. It was a land grab, and a power grab. It was not a war per se but a mob takeover against a weak opponent whose last resort was to hide and strike against a vastly superior army. I may be wrong.
Archaix mentioned that 500,000 people disappeared in the census at the end of the Civil War.

 

[Nexus7]

Folks check this guy John Brown, some say he is the same actor as Abe Lincoln.. but he might just have not existed at all...here a pic search:

john brown - Szukaj w Google

And here alledgly a "pic" made at the Harpers Ferry event, I guess I do not need to point out the strangeness (OR??):

John Brown bei Harpers Ferry, 16. Oktober 1859 Stockfotografie - Alamy

 

[Nexus7]

Mh. It just dawned on my that the ACW was simmilar to the Austrian-Prussian war...Prussia was probably the country with more industry and banking. Perhaps they also were in the process of founding a central bank - and Austria was more rural and some say "backwards"....Prussia won just like the North won and with them winning also banksters, statists (eg. school system, social system ... whiih are all sold as good, but most would know the drawbacks?) and industrialists. Also the Hohenzollern rulers / royality won over Habsburg. Prob the Hohenzollern were mroe in line with the NWO/zionists/jesuits....
Which their coat of arms might reveal btw. - just like the USflag and symbols (mostly roman and egyptian).

Ofc this war was also a brother war, as both being "Germanic" nations

Also not so much in terms of realL pictures of this war and the battles, but more drawings, just click:
preußisch österreichischer krieg - Szukaj w Google

Mh I looked up a lot of pics of the Hohenzollern kings... but found not much suspicious stuff. UNTIL... this one: This is WilhemII
Wilhelm II. (Deutsches Reich) – Wikipedia

 

[greatscot]

I think I understand why the Civil War photos were faked. I was just reading about how the 13 colonies were actually penal colonies owned by the British and the "Americans" were slaves working off their debts. Then I remembered the 13 stars of the Confederate flag (13 penal colonies) and now I think the Civil War/"American Revolution" was a slave rebellion of white and Native American slaves against their British owners. Note that the textbooks say the REBELS were the slavers. The official narrative is a "negation of the negation," a writing trope that completely reverses the situation (like a democratically elected leader becoming a tyrannical dictator or a soldier abandoning his post to join the natives with whom he is supposed to be at war). Whenever you see a negation of a negation, that is a dead giveaway the story is fake and made up by a screenwriter.

Why weren't the Southerners allowed to secede? Because THEY were the slaves