Who stole our history?

[Jd755]

wisdom outlives the body; that ideas and memory endure where flesh fails.

So no different then to what Anatasia says in Vladimir Megre books. Not to mention what Krishnamurti, Nisargadatta Maharaj Alan Watts, Lao Tse,and doubtless other figures from the past said or wrote or have attributed to them say and the Akashic record is said to be store of such wisdom.

It would seem to me you are claiming these proofs are hidden in plain sight. If so one presumes that to 'those with eyes to see' these proofs are not hidden at all indeed they are actually in plain sight.

Where Odin hungers to learn and the Norns spin the threads of fate, Mimir simply is. He does not create wisdom, he remembers it. He is the well that contains all reflections, even the gods’.

So the severed head, that still speaks, (mind meld?) to Odin (and no bugger else it seems) is in truth the well?

I have an explanation of my own device for 369 that I have shared on here a few times and I will do it again as I feel its worth it at this juncture.

369 is not the way it shoud be written and here's why.
9 is all that is.
6 is the reflection of all that is.
All that is cannot see itself as in the same way the eye cannot see itself.
It can only see the reflection of itself and a drop of water relflects the entirety of itself.
Reflections cannot do anything. They are inert unmovng and thus all that is cannot experience itself through reflection.
But.
By splitting itself into two unequal parts 6 and 3 the 9 created life.
Life is able to experience, move, and crucially for the 9 it can discern the reflection for what it is a mirror to all that is.

If the 3 (us) join in with the 6 (reflection) together they become the 9 (all that is).
If the 3 (us) join in with the 9 (all that is ) it collapses into the 3 which is the only thing that moves that percieves and expeiences reflection. If this reality 9 (all that is) is anything it is motion.

So 369 is actually written 9 3 6.

 

[Jd755]

Can you suggest a website or articles for Externsteine as all I find are tourist information and travel info.

Still waiting.

 

[AntiSoof]

Still waiting.

Hermits, Holy Sepulchers, and the Limits of Wilderness at the Externsteine - Different Visions

 

[Jd755]

Hermits, Holy Sepulchers, and the Limits of Wilderness at the Externsteine - Different Visions

Thank you. But waiting for greatscots input.

 

[greatscot]

Thank you. But waiting for greatscots input.

The post I read was on GLP but I don't have link

 

[Jd755]

The post I read was on GLP but I don't have link

Glp?

 

[Breizh]

Glp?

That site isn't recommended. You could say that the 1% genuine information is diluted in the remaining misdirection. "Godlikeproductions". It's the opposite of SH.net in some ways.

 

[Jd755]

That site isn't recommended. You could say that the 1% genuine information is diluted in the remaining misdirection. "Godlikeproductions". It's the opposite of SH.net in some ways.

Isn't recommended?
By who?
I am quite capable of deciding for myself if what I get to read is useful to me or not no matter what site its on.

 

[Jd755]

Its moot anyway as godlikeproductions site controller has 'mass banned" the ip address so I cannot access it. Oh well such is life.
Off to read the ite antisoof kindly provided to see what the other half of greatscots suggestions is all about.

 

[Jd755]

Well with thanks to Antisoof for the article. Interesting read, inc the copiuos references, and clearly nobody knows much of anything about the site or anything found upon it. Once again dating of stone is impossble. Interpretations based on dating of stone abound throughout the article and references.
Cannot for the life of me see how it supports greatscots statement about artifacts being hidden nor the statement jesus the christian was a fake and jesus the pagan was the real deal.

 

[Ilmarinen]

I thought the question of who stole history might get some forum juices flowing.
To be more precise: who (or what) do you think is responsible for all of this confusion and deception we know as history?

As for myself, I'm one of those simulation types, so my beliefs are not what most people would find relatable. The best way I can describe who I think stole history is to reference the thread The last of the Mohicans by tech_dancer.

"Once upon a time a territory of modern Europe was invaded by an unknown army. This army was numerous and it came from the sea. They immediately started conquering all lands in the eastern direction. They used weapons and technology not available today*."

I think it was those guys.


Tell us who you think it was/is, thx!

Italians did. They wrote Scaligerian fake history and made up story Rome & Roman Empire of their own. Several other civilisations followed the suit and also made up their own version of history but Italians championed it.

 

[Jd755]

Italians did. They wrote Scaligerian fake history and made up story Rome & Roman Empire of their own. Several other civilisations followed the suit and also made up their own version of history but Italians championed it.

You do realise what Italy actually is and when and how it was created?
Unification into "Italy" took up thirtyish years of the nineteenth century.
Assuming Scaliger was a living being and not a character as imginary as "the Romans" he cannot have been Italian.
Wish Silveryou was still here. As a Lombard he knows more about such things than I.

 

[Ilmarinen]

You do realise what Italy actually is and when and how it was created?
Unification into "Italy" took up thirtyish years of the nineteenth century.
Assuming Scaliger was a living being and not a character as imginary as "the Romans" he cannot have been Italian.
Wish Silveryou was still here. As a Lombard he knows more about such things than I.

I only assume what is accepted as official history as one point of view, because it serves the reality we have to experience here, and that means it favours those who it favours. Winners write the history is a very real and true thing. Losers don't. Italians are the real winners here as they get all the might and glory of the past. They claim to be the wise geniuses of the past while everybody else was a barbarian. same thing is happening now when Africans claim to own all European past and inventions. Vatican also just happens to be located within Italy if I m not totally and completely mistaken? Vatican represents the largest and most powerful religious group within Europe. Italians also classified themselves from negroe to white with the help of US Suppreme court order was it 1907 ish? So yes, when you ask Que Bono? The very answer is that Italians do. Do the math.

 

[Jd755]

I only assume what is accepted as official history as one point of view, because it serves the reality we have to experience here, and that means it favours those who it favours. Winners write the history is a very real and true thing. Losers don't. Italians are the real winners here as they get all the might and glory of the past. They claim to be the wise geniuses of the past while everybody else was a barbarian. same thing is happening now when Africans claim to own all European past and inventions. Vatican also just happens to be located within Italy if I m not totally and completely mistaken? Vatican represents the largest and most powerful religious group within Europe. Italians also classified themselves from negroe to white with the help of US Suppreme court order was it 1907 ish? So yes, when you ask Que Bono? The very answer is that Italians do. Do the math.

All I can add is what silveryou, who is a Lombard living in Lombardy told me. Italy is a forced grouping of formerly separate kingdoms, principalities and city states.
The northern states are peopled by people very different to the people of the the southern states in regards they way they live. He made no mention of race as far as I recall.
He said there are few people in Italy even today who see themselves as Italian.

Thats the sum of it. He and I are no longer in contact otherwise I could have asked him for clarification.

 

[Histori_iz_a_Lai]

When I read the OP I couldn't take it seriously, hence my 'Mysterons' comment. By its nature, the question can only answered by opinions and theories, as we have seen. Some of those opinions and theories have suggested to me that we may be better able to address the question of who is stealing our history (present tense) rather than who stole it.

When someone claims that "Reading The Dark Earth Chronicles helped break the spell, blah, blah, blah," and then goes on to categorise it as a "Mudflood Theory," to me something is wrong somewhere. I recognise that as joint author I am more sensitive about the subject than others, but to me it's an insult. In effect it's a redefinition that brings with it all of the 'baggage' associated with the general mudflood ideology, which has nothing to do with The Dark Earth Chronicles.

It occurs to me that this is exactly what might happen when something is indexed or classified in a computer database. Let's say, for example, an Artificial Intelligence database. With this in mind I have reexamined the other opinions that have been put forward and some of them do have the stench of AI about them.

Artificial Intelligence is based upon information and it's classification, manipulation and comparison. It's not based upon knowledge and cannot employ wisdom. It can construct opinions based upon information, statistics and algorithms, but it has no concept of knowledge or wisdom.

The website I run brings its fair share of correspondence, for which we are very grateful. One contact in particular was highly excited by his discovery of a new AI 'app' that allowed him create videos from whatever text he would cut and paste into it. He sent some examples of videos he had created using text from articles on the website. The text was not reproduced in full, but analysed and a synopsis created which was then matched with what was considered to be an appropriate video clip.

and who kreated AI? didn't create itself? had to have been the same forces that run the banks, govts, media and all other bs?