I was working for CBS news as a video editor at the time these fires happened and there was no mention of any of this, except of course how bad the fires were. We only received official footage from Calfire in most areas. We didn't get any of the footage shown above. I was never given a single frame of good live footage from these fires and I kept complaining to the news director to no avail. We'd just get shots of tanker drops and crews setting burn lines and such. I kept having to run the same footage over and again. As an editor, it was horrible. Nothing worse than a lack of footage.
Our news crews were not allowed into any sensitive areas to gather footage. Occasionally we'd get something on facebook live, but only one anchor would even gather them. The reporters, photog and web page administrator didn't get us anything like what we see in the videos above. I offered to go gather footage, and they wouldn't let me near a camera, even though I have been a photographer my whole life. Bigger channels from LA and New York were given better footage than us. It was all controlled. It was akin to modern war coverage, where reporters are only allowed access to specific information authorized by the military, but in this case, Calfire. The same holds true in Oregon.
There was also a large fire near the Oregon border and many in Oregon as well. It took out the town of Hornbrook. Once I-5 opened I drove south through the fire and it looked like a war zone. Just like in the videos, crews were quickly replacing guard rails on I-5, some sections it blackened the cement. Some homes were completely burned while trees around them were still fine. Other areas were pure devastation, the trees looked like burnt toothpicks. Completely incinerated.
Some trees next to burned out houses were burnt from the ground up and the crowns were still green. I found it particularly odd that while the fires were still burning, the main activity was logging slightly charred, but very much alive trees. Logging activities all up and down the freeway. Massive logging. Several small fires re-erupted on my trip back to Oregon. I never saw anything like this in my life, and I'm almost 60. From what I've read, these fires happened from Southern California all the way into British Columbia.
I had to quit the news industry. The social programming and corporate BS was too mush to bear, and these fires took the spirit out of me. I was very suspicious of the causes and no one at the station would talk about anything other than lightning strikes or homeless people starting the fires. No one investigated anything. They just blabbered the corporate words that were expected of them. And now that I see what really happened in Paradise, I feel sick. It should have been reported. I wonder how many people died.
Here is another proof that magnetic induction heating is used(but may not be the only modality used). Magnetic induction heating only works on magnetizable ferrous metals(works much less well on Al and Cu) due to rapid magnetization and reversal of the poles thousands of times a second which builds up heat on the surface of the metal. Stainless steel is not magnetizable. In this video you see cars toasted and melted engine blocks but a stainless steel sink and cover are left in pristine condition. At 1:13 in the video on the lower left is an completely unburnt stainless steel sink and cover. Lasers, microwaves, etc would have burnt the stainless steel but because of the way magnetic induction heating works it is not affected whatsoever.
The Ranch Fire, the largest wildfire in California history in terms of acres burned, was caused by a spark or hot metal fragment that came from a hammer driving a metal stake into the ground, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
"After a meticulous and thorough investigation, CAL FIRE has determined that the Ranch Fire was caused by a spark or hot metal fragment landing in a receptive fuel bed," the news release said.
The Ranch Fire, the largest wildfire in California history in terms of acres burned, was caused by a spark or hot metal fragment that came from a hammer driving a metal stake into the ground, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
"After a meticulous and thorough investigation, CAL FIRE has determined that the Ranch Fire was caused by a spark or hot metal fragment landing in a receptive fuel bed," the news release said.
I'm calling bull shit. Who's hammer? What specifically was he striking and why? Was he a worker? A homeowner? Typical BS national news story. No facts, just propaganda to stir up fear.
The Ranch Fire, the largest wildfire in California history in terms of acres burned, was caused by a spark or hot metal fragment that came from a hammer driving a metal stake into the ground, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
"After a meticulous and thorough investigation, CAL FIRE has determined that the Ranch Fire was caused by a spark or hot metal fragment landing in a receptive fuel bed," the news release said.
Another thing that STILL isn’t brought up is the numbers killed/missing from this fire. Do a quick search and all you find are articles from November 2018 with all sorts of numbers. Think if this happened in your area and people/neighbors didn’t come back (if allowed to at all). Could you find out out if they moved away or were just gone? A few you could, but without good citizen bulletin boards (actual paper ones) it would remain unsolved and you assume they’re ‘somewhere’ with relatives or something.
This really proves we have this huge information/data system and internet but it’s totally controlled. We are compartmentalized.
Add to that the previously discussed cognitive dissonance, various forms of mind control including being taught not to take antidotal evidence into account. There are many who don’t think there is any capability, much less naivety of belief any psychopaths would actually do this. In California no less. I really don’t understand the general populations’ ignoring of the reality of the weapons capabilities there are now, and the ramifications (they are silent and almost invisible). I stated before even the prepper forums totally ignore this and they love to talk guns.
No wonder some farmer in Arkansas believed the San Francisco fire story, etc. back then ( including how many actually died). However I know many of those old Arkies didn’t believe in the moon landing, or evolution...
Edited to remind myself not to put blame on us normals/victims. Calling each other sheeple serves them well. 3 years ago I was blissfully (almost) unaware, too.
I don’t see why not. It’s not like we understand the technology available to the pyramid builders, or polygonal masonry masters of the Ancient World. If it’s reasonable for some that they used copper chisels, it’s ok with me.
Tesla was talking about his Death Ray in the 1930s. Jericho’s walls collapsed from some unknown weapon God knows when.
I see distinctive resemblance between those 19th century urban fires, and 2017 California ones.
Will scientists have some rogue “fire storm” theory? Of course they will. It clearly works. This theory worked in the 19th century, and it still works in the 21st.
Their scientific voodoo magic even knows how to tie full size trees in a knot and twist-turn rip them apart. Microburst they say. Sure, why not.
It is quite likely tesla's death ray is the fascia.
This is an artists rendering of it. While it looks just like a Tesla coil, it may be just the artists misunderstanding.
Here's some articles. Bonus points for hindenburg.
It's possible that the energy is invisible, radio, or xray.
"At the time of those tests I succeeded in producing the most powerful X-rays ever seen. I could stand at a distance of 100 feet from the X-ray apparatus and see the bones of the hand clearly with the aid of a fluoroscope screen; and I could have easily seen them at a distance several times this by utilizing suitable power. In fact, I could not then procure X-ray generators to handle even a small fraction of the power I had available. But I now have apparatus designed whereby this tremendous energy of hundreds of kilowatts can be successfully transformed into X-rays."
Also from the article,
At the age of 81, at a luncheon in his honor, concerning the Death Ray, Tesla stated:
“But it is not an experiment…. I have built, demonstrated and used it. Only a little time will pass before I can give it to the world.”
Not that I trust nasa or anything. But I've always had the feeling that all Hubble shots are pictures through the scope of a working Tesla "peace ray".
Notice it's breaking now, and soon to be relegated to "history" and forgotten.
The people behind Agenda 21 did modify certain issues, but they are far from implementing Agenda 21. They then called it 2020, 2030 and 2050. If Agenda 21 was implemented you and I would be deceased. Hope you do not live in a red zone. The scary part to me is the whole Agenda 21,20,30,50 could be a diversion. Yes they are implanting it in local communities but it will take a major cataclysmic to make it happen. Remember they do not care about your life. The other map is supposely where we are supposed to live all 340,000,000 of us. Everything is tied together but how. Korben's need to know curiosity is unique and broad. He has put together a site where we can exchange knowledge and learn from each other. No one person has the answer or even knows the right question.
This map is interesting. It looks like they are attempting to recreate the locations of the old world cities and distribution. Guess the old world had it right to begin with.
I was really hoping for better than that. Yes, colliders are huge electromagnets. HUGE as in MILES big. And they consume an inordinate amount of power. And generate an incredible amounts of heat.
I'm not saying wiki has it all figured out, but the very nature of magnetism and electricity, in my experience, (I have worked, and done some experiments with such) does not allow what you are describing.
Sure MI has improved. But it, so far, hasn't completely upended what is understood about electricity and magnetism. No one has thrown out the inverse square law to my knowledge, which is one of your main hurdles.
No one has yet refuted amperes law either. Which says your gonna need tons of power to do anything remotely like what you describe. Even if the target is inside the coil (as is done industrially).
Fast switching of that kind of power will burn up the most robust of switches.
If we are just using magnetic induction as a place holder for some as yet undetermined woo effect, well that's fine, but unless these laws have been upended, it's a misnomer at the very best. I'm open to other understanding, (if I find time, id test it too, I have one other magnetic experiment in my list) All my electromagnets may just have been of the law abiding type.
These are not the only problems, but I'll not be suckered into relearning very complicated maths by bringing Maxwell's equations into it. View attachment 11007
Happened to notice a very old electromagnet I made to test something or other. I don't remember what the hell i was testing. I remember I started with a magnetic door lock, but just ended up building this rig instead.
This is all presuming a lack of room temperature super conductivity, right?
Are we supposed to believe that it doesn't exist when tptb are using electro gravitic stuff in plain sight while denying it exists?
I've done some pH studies into the properties of platinum group elements in acids and there is definitely something weird going on with element properties.
I'm starting to think that everything has three or more states that are aligned with frequency harmonics.
Ice, water, steam
Fire, electricity, ether
Who knows what properties everything else exhibits. Platinum group elements have at least two electron states. Regular and high spin. Some of these weapons may be using exotic methods.
Yes magnetic induction heating of ferrous metals would leave garbage cans and trees alone with no damage. Humans would suffer no damage but if you were trapped in a car where with the ferrous metals radiating 3000 degrees Fahrenheit, it would kill you quickly.
One thing that is not classical MIH is the pulverizing of the concrete and ceramic bathroom sinks, toilets, and bathtubs in the California areas affected by the "forest fires". Since I think that magnetism is the key to understanding these technologies, I will speculate that a different frequency or configuration of a magnetic field dissociates or transmutes molecules in the brick, mortar, and stones so they have much less strength or no strength at all, causing structures to fail. Re-bar in structures will heat up and expand and will spall out (fracture and push out pieces of concrete surrounding the re-bar) the concrete since concrete is brittle and has little tensile strength but a toilet has no re-bar. So there must be an additional force to cause these destruction's.
As far as other forces involved I have seen the videos with "lasers" and such and it makes sense they would cover their tracks with some real forest fires as a camouflage cover for what they are doing.
It could be that the areas were treated with something before hand. Sprayed by aerosol with some metal that is particulate sized. It might affect concrete then.
It is quite likely tesla's death ray is the fascia.
This is an artists rendering of it. While it looks just like a Tesla coil, it may be just the artists misunderstanding. View attachment 24564
Here's some articles. Bonus points for hindenburg. View attachment 24565View attachment 24566
It's possible that the energy is invisible, radio, or xray.
"At the time of those tests I succeeded in producing the most powerful X-rays ever seen. I could stand at a distance of 100 feet from the X-ray apparatus and see the bones of the hand clearly with the aid of a fluoroscope screen; and I could have easily seen them at a distance several times this by utilizing suitable power. In fact, I could not then procure X-ray generators to handle even a small fraction of the power I had available. But I now have apparatus designed whereby this tremendous energy of hundreds of kilowatts can be successfully transformed into X-rays."
Also from the article,
At the age of 81, at a luncheon in his honor, concerning the Death Ray, Tesla stated:
“But it is not an experiment…. I have built, demonstrated and used it. Only a little time will pass before I can give it to the world.”
Not that I trust nasa or anything. But I've always had the feeling that all Hubble shots are pictures through the scope of a working Tesla "peace ray".
Notice it's breaking now, and soon to be relegated to "history" and forgotten.
Post automatically merged:
This map is interesting. It looks like they are attempting to recreate the locations of the old world cities and distribution. Guess the old world had it right to begin with.
Post automatically merged:
This is all presuming a lack of room temperature super conductivity, right?
Are we supposed to believe that it doesn't exist when tptb are using electro gravitic stuff in plain sight while denying it exists?
I've done some pH studies into the properties of platinum group elements in acids and there is definitely something weird going on with element properties.
I'm starting to think that everything has three or more states that are aligned with frequency harmonics.
Ice, water, steam
Fire, electricity, ether
Who knows what properties everything else exhibits. Platinum group elements have at least two electron states. Regular and high spin. Some of these weapons may be using exotic methods.
Post automatically merged:
It could be that the areas were treated with something before hand. Sprayed by aerosol with some metal that is particulate sized. It might affect concrete then.
Yeah RTSC has not been developed to my knowledge. If you have other info, I'd love to see it.
It has also made sense to me for some time that the most likely way to create a "antigravity" device is to produce counter rotating magnetic fields in a superconductor. There is an experiment i would like to try towards this end, but that is another discussion.
Either way, MI as the cause for this, is laughable. Some stainless is magnetic and some is not, it depends on the lattice structure of the alloy. Also, at a given temperature, for an alloy, known as the curie point, any metal loses all its magnetism. This is typically well below the melting point. The amount of power required for each degree of heating would be exponential, and likely have a limit approaching infinity.
So RTSC or not, any which way you look at it, magnetic induction would be a very poor choice to achieve these effects. In fact, i would say it is impossible.
Yeah RTSC has not been developed to my knowledge. If you have other info, I'd love to see it.
It has also made sense to me for some time that the most likely way to create a "antigravity" device is to produce counter rotating magnetic fields in a superconductor. There is an experiment i would like to try towards this end, but that another discussion.
I'd love to hear if you get results from your experiment. I gotta dig thru my stuff and see if I can find my references to this, but I had some diagrams that mentioned mercury being used in the center, as well as some kind of gas for the looking glass device. I wanna say xenon, but I don't think that's it. Some metal. Anyway, yeah it's like two counter rotating discs with electricity injected between the plates like a compressor or something.
So for those fires, what do you think could melt the blocks but not a flag on a flagpole?
Possibly it's some particle acceleration or resonant device tuned to the frequency of metal or occupying a bandwidth that overlaps metal and concrete?
Could it be the water content of trees that saved them?
That flag keeps bugging me. Just sitting there with the house wrecked.
Yeah RTSC has not been developed to my knowledge. If you have other info, I'd love to see it.
It has also made sense to me for some time that the most likely way to create a "antigravity" device is to produce counter rotating magnetic fields in a superconductor. There is an experiment i would like to try towards this end, but that is another discussion.
Either way, MI as the cause for this, is laughable. Some stainless is magnetic and some is not, it depends on the lattice structure of the alloy. Also, at a given temperature, for an alloy, known as the curie point, any metal loses all its magnetism. This is typically well below the melting point. The amount of power required for each degree of heating would be exponential, and likely have a limit approaching infinity.
So RTSC or not, any which way you look at it, magnetic induction would be a very poor choice to achieve these effects. In fact, i would say it is impossible.
You ignore evidence of magnetic induction because you can't puzzle it out using what you have been indoctrinated to believe is possible, however, stainless steel left in pristine condition while regular steel in structures and cars show this type of heating. Explain why stainless a steel sink would not be affected? You can't.
You ignore evidence of magnetic induction because you can't puzzle it out using what you have been indoctrinated to believe is possible, however, stainless steel left in pristine condition while regular steel in structures and cars show this type of heating. Explain why stainless a steel sink would not be affected? You can't.
You are projecting, and I don't care for it. I don't ignore evidence, nor do I rearrange it to fit a pre conceived conclusion. You also underestimate my abilities, and refuse to learn anything about the mechanism you claim is causing this phenomenon. You are coming very close to ad hominem fallacy here, and attacking me, because you don't like my evidence. You are better than that. (I am an optimist)
You conveniently leave out the melted aluminum alloy rims (non magnetic), as they do not fit your preconceived notions and latch on to this SS sink.
Magnetic Induction fails for this for many many reasons. Have you ever seen a blacksmith using a magnet to determine whether a hot piece of steel has achieved a temperature appropriate for quenching? Have you any idea of the difference between ferritic, martensitic and austenitic steel? Do you know what a curie point is? Do you know what a face centered metallic crystalline structure is vs a body centered crystalline structure and how this affects the properties of the metal? Do you have the faintest clue how much energy magnetic induction would require to achieve the results you are ascribing to it? Have you even looked at the inverse square law or the Lorentz equations? Do you know what a halbach array is? I'll thank you to educate yourself before attempting to denigrate me.
Some of these things may well not be fully understood, but these materials, methods, and equations are in use every single day, and they work in consistent, verifiable, and repeatable ways. I'll not throw out all that I've learned through research and practical application, just to make you feel better about your shoe-horned theory. I gave you an out. If you are calling some as of yet undiscovered mechanism or process, some form of woo, "magnetic induction", then fine, but it isn't, and cannot be the same mechanism, called magnetic induction, that is used every day all over the world, and behaves in consistent, verifiable, and repeatable ways.
Here is a VERY simple explanation for your stainless steel sink, that I'm sure you wont accept, because it doesn't fit your baseless conclusions. 304 stainless (the most common for sinks, because of its various properties, had you even done this modicum of research?) has a higher melting point than many other steels. If that is not good enough, you can combine the fact that it has higher thermal conductivity than many other steels as well, therefore having a greater ability to dissipate heat energy.
You are projecting, and I don't care for it. I don't ignore evidence, nor do I rearrange it to fit a pre conceived conclusion. You also underestimate my abilities, and refuse to learn anything about the mechanism you claim is causing this phenomenon. You are coming very close to ad hominem fallacy here, and attacking me, because you don't like my evidence. You are better than that. (I am an optimist)
You conveniently leave out the melted aluminum alloy rims (non magnetic), as they do not fit your preconceived notions and latch on to this SS sink.
Magnetic Induction fails for this for many many reasons. Have you ever seen a blacksmith using a magnet to determine whether a hot piece of steel has achieved a temperature appropriate for quenching? Have you any idea of the difference between ferritic, martensitic and austenitic steel? Do you know what a curie point is? Do you know what a face centered metallic crystalline structure is vs a body centered crystalline structure and how this affects the properties of the metal? Do you have the faintest clue how much energy magnetic induction would require to achieve the results you are ascribing to it? Have you even looked at the inverse square law or the Lorentz equations? Do you know what a halbach array is? I'll thank you to educate yourself before attempting to denigrate me.
Some of these things may well not be fully understood, but these materials, methods, and equations are in use every single day, and they work in consistent, verifiable, and repeatable ways. I'll not throw out all that I've learned through research and practical application, just to make you feel better about your shoe-horned theory. I gave you an out. If you are calling some as of yet undiscovered mechanism or process, some form of woo, "magnetic induction", then fine, but it isn't, and cannot be the same mechanism, called magnetic induction, that is used every day all over the world, and behaves in consistent, verifiable, and repeatable ways.
Here is a VERY simple explanation for your stainless steel sink, that I'm sure you wont accept, because it doesn't fit your baseless conclusions. 304 stainless (the most common for sinks, because of its various properties, had you even done this modicum of research?) has a higher melting point than many other steels. If that is not good enough, you can combine the fact that it has higher thermal conductivity than many other steels as well, therefore having a greater ability to dissipate heat energy.
Melted aluminum rims can be melted by magnetic induction heating and so can copper. The heat is not confined to the surface of the metal but is distributed throughout the metal so it is not as effective in melting these metals and that is why in home cooking, magnetic induction stovetops copper pans can be used to more evenly distribute the heat to the food. Regular Steel when subjected to MIH only affects the surface and does not easily distribute the heat to the interior of the steel. 304 stainless steel is NOT MAGNETIC so it would not be affected by magnetic induction heating as shown in the video. Your skills are weaker than you realize. As the imaginary detective Sherlock Holmes said, ""How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth? Yes I have looked at the inverse square law or the Lorentz equations and traditional magnetic induction heating technology could not accomplish the destruction, however, we are talking about classified military technology where the MIH field can be projected to battlefield locations. All of the evidence points to MIH and because there is not a device that you know about does not negate the plethora of evidence on the ground. There's 30,000 particle colliders in the world today and this technology is key to understanding the phenomenon.
Haha. Ya know. I was gonna (try) to explain some of this to you. Almost every statement you made is wrong to one degree or another. It would be easier to list the correct statements. Aluminum and copper CAN be melted with magnetic induction. True. 304 stainless is not [ferro]- magnetic. True (but had to fix it a bit)
Can a magnetic field be directed over a long distance without significant losses? Yep. Best going method I've heard of is using a ferromagnetic core, surrounded by a superconductor. A magnetic hose. Was there one in the pics I missed? Probably not, since even the highest temperature superconductors still require temps well below zero to function.
I just let you show me a copper pot working on an induction cooktop. You can't, because they don't work. It does have to do with the skin effect. Could they be made to work? Yes. Do they? No. Are some of them Partially copper? Probably, because of its high thermal conductivity. Induction cooktops are made to work with ferro-magnetic materials. Copper is a poor material for this function for a few reasons.
Woosah. Gooosfraba.
I guess the MIC built the pyramids too. The only evidence we need is that there is no evidence.
ETA, the skin effect has little to do with whether the conductor in question is magnetic or not. ALL conductive materials experience the skin effect. It is a function of alternating current.
I'm not trying to pour gasoline on a fire here. I do believe in civil discourse. I thought to give my two cents regarding the two quotes above.
Beins I am a well rounded metal fabricator and welder, custom, industrial, etc, for several decades, I would have to disagree with both of you that 304 SS isn't magnetic.
304 has it's place and purpose, and it has slight magnetic properties. In layman's terms, I would refer to 304 as an impure SS alloy in the big picture of SS, 316/316L being far superior regarding purity.
A lot of industrial fabrication shops work with a lot of 316, and 304, and most all have an area that keep usable scrap from the plate shear, plasma table, etc. How did I used to tell which was 304, and which was 316 if it had no visible markings... A magnet.
I just tested my kitchen sink, and it's slightly magnetic as well
