Flat Earth

It's a bit amusing they moved the Artemis II launch date to April 1st. You really can't make this shit up.

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5808291-nasa-artemis-moon-mission/
The launch is at 6.24am US time (66) on 1.4.2026 (adds up to 15=6) so 666. Artemis in mythology is the twin sister of Apollo. Apollo 11 was the first flight that landed on the moon. Artemis 11 (supposedly 2 but hey it’s all quite clearly comms) is its twin. If it appears to be going ahead look out for other similarities. But I fear for fatal fakery - fire on board as in the Challenger moon mission in which two women died. Artemis has a woman on board with the surname Koch (German for Cook). But as the whole thing is clearly a spoof, April 1st tomfoolery, it is possibly going to be a reveal that the first one never happened. Let’s hope this gigantic monstrosity doesn’t pierce the firmament or we could all have hell to pay!
 
The launch is at 6.24am US time (66) on 1.4.2026 (adds up to 15=6) so 666. Artemis in mythology is the twin sister of Apollo. Apollo 11 was the first flight that landed on the moon. Artemis 11 (supposedly 2 but hey it’s all quite clearly comms) is its twin. If it appears to be going ahead look out for other similarities. But I fear for fatal fakery - fire on board as in the Challenger moon mission in which two women died. Artemis has a woman on board with the surname Koch (German for Cook). But as the whole thing is clearly a spoof, April 1st tomfoolery, it is possibly going to be a reveal that the first one never happened. Let’s hope this gigantic monstrosity doesn’t pierce the firmament or we could all have hell to pay!
Sorry - should have said 6.24pm
 
The launch is at 6.24am US time (66) on 1.4.2026 (adds up to 15=6) so 666. Artemis in mythology is the twin sister of Apollo. Apollo 11 was the first flight that landed on the moon. Artemis 11 (supposedly 2 but hey it’s all quite clearly comms) is its twin. If it appears to be going ahead look out for other similarities. But I fear for fatal fakery - fire on board as in the Challenger moon mission in which two women died. Artemis has a woman on board with the surname Koch (German for Cook). But as the whole thing is clearly a spoof, April 1st tomfoolery, it is possibly going to be a reveal that the first one never happened. Let’s hope this gigantic monstrosity doesn’t pierce the firmament or we could all have hell to pay!
Thanks for the info Just. The way I see it there are only a few possibilities here:

1, like you said, it blows up. As far as piercing firmamets, that's the least of my worries.
2, it's a horrible pathetic CGI affair like the Chinese and indian missions.
3, it's real but once we get close reptiles in spaceships capture us.

My money is on number two. What a clown world this has become. I think there is some sort of good news somewhere on the horizon though. I really do. I have absolutely noticed some sort of exponential increase in things; time, events.

So I interpret that as an end point not too far away.

You know, that makes me think of some theories I've heard about some sort of rogue AI controlling all of the internet and that it branches out into the physical world, and can affect things there. Or that a rogue group controls an AI that does that. Who knows.
 
I'm really looking forward to seeing the CGI they have cooked up for this one. I mean, it can't possibly be worse than the Indian "footage".
Its on! Woohoo
Full moon
April fool's
33rd day Iran war
Trump speaks tonight
1775084041408.jpeg
 
Official NASA link to image from the mission. Notice the guy on the right is tilting his head "upwards".

The Artemis II crew inside Orion - NASA

View attachment 36206


If anyone thinks that guy isn't being suspended by a harness in front of a green screen...watch the video below. It's worth watching from the beginning but starts at a specific time to make the point about the image in this post.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5R5S_xMFrA&t=334s

Thanks Jeenam. Please use all of your available technical prowess to pinpoint the bullshit. I won't link to it cause y'all are lazy and need to do your own research, but I thought Miles Mathis piece on this was pretty good; the backgrounds of these fools is ridiculous.
 
Its beyond doubt that earth whatever it is, is not a spinning ball. Simply observing with ones own eyes is enough to prove it to oneself. No need to convince anyone else.
Also nobody knows how or when the ball earth idea left the mind of a human and was turned into the mental prison it is today. Why is unknown as well but at least we are in with a shout of getting a handle on potential 'whys' if we are interested enough to go digging.

What is the gain from the imposition of the ball earth lie?
Who gains today from it, outside of those working in the very considerable effort to keep it going?
Reason for answering the second question is it may shed some light onto what the gain was for the man who first implemented it.

Might just be an emperors new clothes kind of thing, for example.
 
Last edited:
Its beyond doubt that earth whatever it is, is not a spinning ball. Simply observing with ones own eyes is enough to prove it to oneself. No need to convince anyone else.
Also nobody knows how or when the ball earth idea left the mind of a human and was turned into the mental prison it is today. Why is unknown as well but at least we are in with a shout of getting a handle on potential 'whys' if we are interested enough to go digging.

What is the gained from the imposition of the ball earth lie?
Who gains today from it, outside of those working in the very considerable effort to keep it going?
Reason for answering the second question is it may shed some light onto what the gain was for the man who first implemented it.

Might just be an emperors new clothes kind of thing, for example.
And what do you all think of the ‘globe earth at night picture? They are very specific about where the edge of the window is which means they read the arguments of FE very closely. Also why no video footage to show it spinning- that would be impressive! 🤔
 
Official NASA link to image from the mission. Notice the guy on the right is tilting his head "upwards".

The Artemis II crew inside Orion - NASA

View attachment 36206


If anyone thinks that guy isn't being suspended by a harness in front of a green screen...watch the video below. It's worth watching from the beginning but starts at a specific time to make the point about the image in this post.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5R5S_xMFrA&t=334s

Do you mean the man on the left not the right?
 
And what do you all think of the ‘globe earth at night picture? They are very specific about where the edge of the window is which means they read the arguments of FE very closely. Also why no video footage to show it spinning- that would be impressive! 🤔
Its fake. Everything we are told about "space" is fake.
Why is the question.
 
Its fake. Everything we are told about "space" is fake.
Why is the question.
What I’d like to know from any tech-savvy people is can this be shown to be AI? Previous pictures seemed to be composite pictures with bits of the plane pasted together to make a globe. But when I look back at all the previous pics and this new one they all look entirely fake to me.
 
What I’d like to know from any tech-savvy people is can this be shown to be AI? Previous pictures seemed to be composite pictures with bits of the plane pasted together to make a globe. But when I look back at all the previous pics and this new one they all look entirely fake to me.
On the question of why they’re hiding this now, I’d guess you have your own thoughts. Mine are: 1) a flat, domed earth can’t be randomly from some big bang nonsense which means the creationists have to be right 2) Related to the first point, believing in a god means acceptance of our significance in this world - we aren’t less than nothing which is what they want us to think 3) All of science would become questionable 4) The fear and the horror people would experience would tip us off the scale to mass psychosis.
On the question of why they ever lied about this, I’d say 1) They are the antithesis of god’s creatures so everything gets inverted. 2) The ignorance of our origins makes us easier to control. 3) We are part of an experiment which requires us to be unaware of our environment. 4) We are the slaves of the powers that have assumed control of this world so we must never be allowed to understand we have the power to rebel against them. 5) Finally, if the plane we are on is in a constant state of partial habitability with three quarters of it under ice as some (including me) believe, the horror of discovering that no lands ‘belong’ to any one group of people and we are all the descendants of immigrants and survivors from mega catastrophes (not hard to believe).
Any other thoughts?
 
On the question of why they’re hiding this now, I’d guess you have your own thoughts. Mine are: 1) a flat, domed earth can’t be randomly from some big bang nonsense which means the creationists have to be right 2) Related to the first point, believing in a god means acceptance of our significance in this world - we aren’t less than nothing which is what they want us to think 3) All of science would become questionable 4) The fear and the horror people would experience would tip us off the scale to mass psychosis.
On the question of why they ever lied about this, I’d say 1) They are the antithesis of god’s creatures so everything gets inverted. 2) The ignorance of our origins makes us easier to control. 3) We are part of an experiment which requires us to be unaware of our environment. 4) We are the slaves of the powers that have assumed control of this world so we must never be allowed to understand we have the power to rebel against them. 5) Finally, if the plane we are on is in a constant state of partial habitability with three quarters of it under ice as some (including me) believe, the horror of discovering that no lands ‘belong’ to any one group of people and we are all the descendants of immigrants and survivors from mega catastrophes (not hard to believe).
Any other thoughts?
Excellent points. Good to see someone else posting their thoughts on the subject rather than dropping other peoples videos and imagery.
My thoughts laid out in this fashion for clarity.

Mine are:
1) a flat, domed earth can’t be randomly from some big bang nonsense which means the creationists have to be right


Some words missing there. As you mention 'the dome' could you expand on why you believe there is a dome?

2) Related to the first point, believing in a god means acceptance of our significance in this world - we aren’t less than nothing which is what they want us to think


3) All of science would become questionable .
4) The fear and the horror people would experience would tip us off the scale to mass psychosis.


The lies would be writ large for all to see and the consequences are unpredictable that much is clear. Fear of death is indeed a reason for lies. Not convinced of the mass psychosis to be honest.


On the question of why they ever lied about this, I’d say

1) They are the antithesis of god’s creatures so everything gets inverted.


Honestly I am not on board with the duality of god vs devil/satan/antichrist/ etc. Neither am on board with idea of god as an omnipotent creator.
The inversion however am totally onboard with that as without it duality doesn't have the illusion of existence. Its a mask over reality.

2) The ignorance of our origins makes us easier to control.

Good point. Control of the many by the few does seem to be case. However given that inversion is being used it could be that its the many are controlling the few but don't realise.
Our origins are beyond all human knowing best I can tell

3) We are part of an experiment which requires us to be unaware of our environment.

We are like as not completely aware of our environment but seem gullible in that we choose to readily believe in lies instead of trusting ourselves.

4) We are the slaves of the powers that have assumed control of this world so we must never be allowed to understand we have the power to rebel against them.

Can you expand on what "the powers" are?

5) Finally, if the plane we are on is in a constant state of partial habitability with three quarters of it under ice as some (including me) believe, the horror of discovering that no lands ‘belong’ to any one group of people and we are all the descendants of immigrants and survivors from mega catastrophes (not hard to believe).

Basically then you are on the same page as Will Scarlett more or less. He believes in a 10th Century catastrophe which was an explosion so vast it destroyed the lands around what we today are told is the North Pole (EDIT aplogies to Will. He believes the dark came down from the sky or another dimension) and this event wiped out an awful lot of the 'civilisation' of the day and otherwise affected the lives of many distant peoples.
Cannot remember if he believes in the ice wall or not but you can find out here. The Dark Earth Chronicles Series

Fwiw I do not believe in the ice wall idea nor the 10th century catastrophe nor for that matter any of the other catastrophes put forward over the years and the subsequent "survivor" theory.
I doubt Antarctica and the Arctic are what we are told they are and the maps of "the world" are not accurate representations of the reality we experience.
 
Last edited:
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top