Flat Earth

It's our fault we expect Flat Earthers to understand this.


You Flat Earthers still haven't realized that the Azimuthal Equidistant projection is a spherical Earth projection, because Flat Earthers don't want to accept the truth.

Can any Flat Earther show me how the shadow of Mount Rainier is formed in the Flat Earth model at sunset without denying Mount Rainier?

View attachment 22103
Oh, only now do I see what you mean! You mean the sun is not at the same height. That's not what flat earthers say. It is hard to get. But after 3 days i got it.
If the sun stayed at the same height, that mountain could never be lit from below.
 
proxy.gif
This is how science says we earthlings move through space
 
You forgot to add Polaris to the mix. It's really the icing on the cake.

Polaris, like all stars, should be a blur at best, considering the insanely outrageous speeds of Planet Earth.
o01-sk.gif

Astronomy Authority would have us believe we live on a carnival ride, the Tilt-a-Whirl.
Not only is that idea ludicrous on steroids, our carnival ride is mounted on a roller coaster, or a bullet train that rockets through a total vacuum at mind-numbing speeds.

rotation, 1000 mph
orbit, 66,600 mph
solar system, 5 million mph

And yet, to add insult to Injury, the North Star is always smack dab where it always has been, as well as all the constellations, century after century, despite the egregiously goofy trajectories that allegedly move stars billions and billions of miles each year.
🤪😜🤩
idiotic
asinine
dumber than a box of moon rocks
nuttier than a squirrel's supper.
ridonkeyluss

ok, I have run out of adjectives to describe the hornswoglle.
 
Last edited:
Oh, only now do I see what you mean! You mean the sun is not at the same height. That's not what flat earthers say. It is hard to get. But after 3 days i got it.
If the sun stayed at the same height, that mountain could never be lit from below.
Yes it could. Aren't the suns rays subject to atmospheric conditions? We have various optical effects caused by differing temperatures/densities in atmospheric layers

Optical Phenomena

Where is the suns position in that photo? Hard to make that out.
 
Here's a reply from Sandokhan to your comment (He's unable to reply to this thread due to being 'sandboxed' into his own private thread):

Sandokhan's Link and Post Collection

If you wish to reply to his comment, please do so in his thread.
Thanks.
I don’t wish to disobey administration's thread requirements.
In fact, I appreciate the decision that requires posters to stick to a topic's thesis.

But in this case, Sandokhan reminds us that we flatearthers have to deal with the "math" and "science" that the Control System uses as the alibi of their false model.

sandokhan said:
Both Kepler's first law and the fact that the geometrical shape of the movement of the solar system towards the star Vega must a be a helix, cannot be true at the same time.
We take different paths to arrive at the same destination.

The Atom theory is a miniaturized solar system.
In both models, a central object exerts a gravitational field around which other objects orbit in elliptical patterns.

The creators of both fictitious and unproven theories used, as FarewellAngelina has pointed out, another fiction, the c constant to represent the speed of light.

The whole tangled ball of lies can never be pulled straight as long as C is allowed to justify the false math. We also must recognize many other assumptions that are just like criminals who testify in favor of other criminals. In our case, the Atom, gravity, space-time, fictional constants, Vega.

All these hypothetical ideas were constructed to deny the luminiferous aether.
. . .

Speaking of luminous, we have full moons.
This was meant to be a new post.


H4Y7GD3ZEJEV5BU2RUHQJ74HUM.jpg

Can anyone explain this pic?

Where is the sun?

And how does the moon shine, from limb to limb to limb?
 
Last edited:
Here's a reply from Sandokhan to your comment (He's unable to reply to this thread due to being 'sandboxed' into his own private thread):

Sandokhan's Link and Post Collection

If you wish to reply to his comment, please do so in his thread.
I've read some of his 'work'. I really wish I could post in off-topic forums. *sigh* maybe someday if I'm on my best behavior I'll get to. I'm... not holding my breath, lol.
 
Yes it could. Aren't the suns rays subject to atmospheric conditions? We have various optical effects caused by differing temperatures/densities in atmospheric layers

Optical Phenomena

Where is the suns position in that photo? Hard to make that out.
You are right, FarewellAngelina.
Fata Morgana; "When the temperature inversion is not even, you may see a Fata Morgana. This could be caused by several layers of warm and cold air that cause a combination of superior and inferior mirages.".
The phenomenon of the mirage could thus explain some photos where objects below the horizon are nevertheless visible. (And the other way around.)
 
View attachment 22466

Can anyone explain this pic?
Yes. It's 'shopped. Download the pic, and zoom in - you'll find a lot of what appear to be edits and corrections around the moon. These edits and corrections could also be 'attributed' to atmospheric conditions - except that there are many that occur at right angles, and those can't really be attributed to anything except an edit.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.jpg
    Capture.jpg
    3.8 KB · Views: 106
Yes. It's 'shopped. Download the pic, and zoom in - you'll find a lot of what appear to be edits and corrections around the moon. These edits and corrections could also be 'attributed' to atmospheric conditions - except that there are many that occur at right angles, and those can't really be attributed to anything except an edit.

Well, yes, maybe, but not what I was pointing out, haphazardly.
I picked a pretty pic of a full moon, hoping someone would point out that full moons are impossible 100% of the time.

Because the sun has gone down.
That is, the sky is dark because the globe has come between the sun and the moon, blocking the light and preventing the alleged reflection effect.
The only way the entire moon ball could be illuminated is when it sits exactly opposite the sun. Which is, obviously, where the fat globe is situated.

If some sunlight were shining from the sun onto one side (limb) of the moon, we could see a crescent portion lit up, or more. But not the entire surface.
 
Last edited:
I have seen this version of the impossible sight few hours after sunset at winter in the nordic.

H4Y7GD3ZEJEV5BU2RUHQJ74HUM.jpg

 
I also had seen this type of moon once after sunset. What amazed me its gigantic size which after few hours became normal. The distance of moon from earth does not change of any significance in few hours.
 

Attachments

  • 20354-5b44c0f230a889601f5ec45d714fa605.jpg
    20354-5b44c0f230a889601f5ec45d714fa605.jpg
    7.4 KB · Views: 95
Gandalf is enjoying this thread tremendously. Good on him.
I wish I could say that the moon rock amuses me, but...
that would be a lie.
Really? a 2000-mile-wide rock floats over our heads at night, and sometimes in broad daylight.
But it does not crash into earth because the sun exerts gravity that keeps it locked in a Goldilocks zone, at juuuuust the right spot in perpetual orbit.

It is, obviously, a self-illuminating light effect, similar to the sun. In a structure we call the dome. Other light effects in the dome are called stars and planets.

Besides faking space travel, NASA routinely concocts fanciful photos of these celestial sights, including Mars.

Lately, an image from Nasa has popped up on discussion boards. This particular humdinger "accidentally" shows a mysterious door in a Martian hill.
To which I replied on one forum:
............

EyD0--BXAAIWHyt.png

Nasa budget, $24 billion
Aid to Ukraine, $53 billion
Bridge repair on my road, $zilch

edit: here is a better resolution of the image.

EyD0--BXAAIWHyt.png
 
I have seen this version of the impossible sight few hours after sunset at winter in the nordic.

View attachment 22511

Please say what latitude?

I have observed this kind of behaviour for many years, I even invested in camera gear to try and document it.

It often seems to me that the angle of the light/dark axis line across the Moon's face is not at the correct orientation compared to where the Sun is. In the case of this photo, the Sun has just set to the right, so you would expect that light/dark line to be tilting slightly right. Instead, it's tilting about five degrees left. (I'm not sure if the given photo is exactly what was seen, or just a representation).

I was observing the Sun and Moon a few days ago when there was a waxing half Moon and both of them were a similar height in the sky, maybe 30 degrees elevation. So the Sun was directly over to the right from the Moon. Approximately 90 degrees of azimuth between them. I would expect the Moon's bright/dark line to be more or less vertical under those conditions, but it was tilted to the left by 45 degrees.
 





Robert Sungenis, a Geocentrist, but strong anti-Flat Earther, invites you to his September Colorado conference!
God Created a
Geocentric World
in Six Literal Days
World.jpg


2nd Annual Catholic Conference
With guest speakers:

Robert Sungenis,
PhD Theology

Sungenis_Photo.png

Robert Bennet,
PhD Physics

Bennett_Photo.png

Fri & Sat September 23 - 24, 2022
Holiday Inn Express & Suites
610 Genoa Way, Castle Rock, CO 80109
Details attached

Sponsored by:
Queen of the Apostles Mission Association
PO Box 1676
Castle Rock, CO 80104
720-23-7223
Sign up at www.qama.org
 

Attachments

  • 1652444385493.png
    1652444385493.png
    23.9 KB · Views: 109
Last edited:
Sponsored by:
Queen of the Apostles Mission Association


This tells me everything I need to know. :LOL:
 
This mind-bending video by GlobeBusters shows you several geographical features that drive the truth home. I have cued it so you can see the next six minutes full of various shots and images.

It works.. just click on the link that begins with View , not the image

Please please.. please watch this video. You will see anti-gravity experiments, a guy blowing out candles just by pointing at them without touching them and various applications of the real physics that we are not taught in school.



View: https://youtu.be/gLSCYEuzQYQ?list=TLPQMTEwNTIwMjJrjP8kpJSdOg&t=190
 
Last edited:
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top