Here's a reply from Sandokhan to your comment (He's unable to reply to this thread due to being 'sandboxed' into his own private thread):
Sandokhan's Link and Post Collection
If you wish to reply to his comment, please do so in his thread.
Thanks.
I don’t wish to disobey administration's thread requirements.
In fact, I appreciate the decision that requires posters to stick to a topic's thesis.
But in this case, Sandokhan reminds us that we flatearthers have to deal with the "math" and "science" that the Control System uses as the alibi of their false model.
sandokhan said:
Both Kepler's first law and the fact that the geometrical shape of the movement of the solar system towards the star Vega must a be a helix, cannot be true at the same time.
We take different paths to arrive at the same destination.
The Atom theory is a miniaturized solar system.
In both models, a central object exerts a gravitational field around which other objects orbit in elliptical patterns.
The creators of both fictitious and unproven theories used, as FarewellAngelina has pointed out, another fiction, the c constant to represent the speed of light.
The whole tangled ball of lies can never be pulled straight as long as C is allowed to justify the false math. We also must recognize many other assumptions that are just like criminals who testify in favor of other criminals. In our case, the Atom, gravity, space-time, fictional constants, Vega.
All these hypothetical ideas were constructed to deny the luminiferous aether.
. . .
Speaking of luminous, we have full moons.
This was meant to be a new post.
Can anyone explain this pic?
Where is the sun?
And how does the moon shine, from limb to limb to limb?