Flat Earth

[Tetromino]

I started, actually I'm trying to observe stars, but having a clear sky in London is difficult.

I was never satisfied with the fact that I could never, ever see the so-called milky way in the sky. I've been in places that are away from lights and I still haven't seen anything but a great blackness with usual white dots that we call stars. Some people claim they have seen it with their own eyes but that you have to be somewhere stupidly remote. I can be in the middle of the countryside where there are zero lights and still not fucking see anything resembling the pictures we are shown.

Even I were to witness it one day, it could honestly be anything.

 

[grav]

Today, if you say the world isn't a ball spinning around several balls in all directions and at the same time traveling at I don't know how many km/h, the vast majority of people will automatically go against you, but are unable to explain why. I know: Mind control.

The sample from your long and thoughtful post is just what I intended to rant about this day after Thanksgiving.
Yes, I am still smarting from a day with good people who believe they live on a spinning ball where 3 Abrahamic religions fight for control of the globe.
Mind control, you say? My guess is that our Anunnaki rulers put a crimp in the human pineal gland, which cut off mankind's ability to think. That lack of discernment may very well lead to a Georgia Guidestones culling and reset. soon. ?

A second guess is that our projected reality is a digital game in which we aetheric beings blunder around like mice in a maze.
or a horse race. or an IQ test. or a gnostic myth where the Demiurge wreaks havoc on Mother Nature's pet humans.

The masters of our fake universe are, supposedly, in theory, required to let us see the truth. And some of us do. But most people see and still refuse to accept obvious facts. Cognitive dissonance is the usual diagnosis.
George Orwell spelled out the process in 1984. Big Brother mind controls from cradle to grave, through education and entertainment systems. It's the Star Trekization of human consciousness.

 

[Seiya]

I've read and re-read this page many times in a futile attempt to reconcile the flood of ideas that describe our universe.
The image above, for one, depicts the simulation projection which is really ? that which we call the aether.
which is basically electricity. in various forms of radiation. Matter is one of the forms, and humans are infrared beings inhabited by invisible beings. Religions call this entiy the soul, or spirit. In Plato's philosophy the Nous is the intellect, or the highest level of the Form. Which begs the question,,,,,,, where does intelligence come from? Creativity? Imagination? AI??
But I digress.

Matter is electricity? How? Give me an example of electricity being transformed into physical substance. Not the application of electricity to something that already exists.

I'm curious because if the definition of matter is: physical substance in general, as distinct from mind and spirit; (in physics) that which occupies space and possesses rest mass, especially as distinct from energy.

Or are you referring to the Alchemist perspective? But even so, it's not correct.

"humans are infrared beings inhabited by invisible beings. Religions call this entiy the soul, or spirit."

Maybe human is this thing "2 entity in 1 red body", I don't know, what I know. Human refers to the species, but we don't have a species because we are unique. Cats have a species.
What I know is: there are men and women, to refer the beingas a whole: "man" or "mankind."
Man is made of Soul, Spirit and Body, and this is the origin of The Trinity, has absolutely nothing to do with the criminal scheme called religion. even the term Trinity is corrupted, deception: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Soul, Spirit, and Body are not three entities, they are not entities at all. The 3 together make life, make you exist in the reality

The enemy manipulates us in various ways, and one of them is wanting us to draw conclusions by isolating things or actions. That's what science has been doing, at least for the last 225 years. This scenario of isolation doesn't exist in the real world. Everything connects and influences other things.
So intellect is not a separate thing, but rather a characteristic of ours. Intelligence, Creativity, Imagination are characteristics of ours, and at the individual level, each person has a degree of development of each characteristic. So is not come from anywhere, is already part of you, us.

The second Big Question this page provokes is the form of our universe. Inside a toroid where an accretion disk (or pancakrd disks) becomes the Infinite Plane. And here we go again. New vocabu.ary.

I don't believe that's what's being demonstrated or explained. It's meant to be viewed like an instruction manual.

For example, they're not saying the washing machine flies, levitates, or is located in an empty space, or that it's transparent and those parts are blue.

I don't know, but shouldn't that be obvious?

AllTheScience

All The Science - Explore the Latest Research and Discoveries › what-is-a-superfluid.htm

What is a Superfluid? (with picture) - AllTheScience
May 21, 2024A superfluid is a phase of matter capable of flowing endlessly without energy loss. Th

Some other sites I looked at suggested helium as the main ingredient of the superfluid. not waters as in Bible and myths?
I earlier compared the mechanism as something like an orrery. or Antikythera device. Wheels within wheels. clock within a bigger clock? Vibes of Cosmos made a video (posted a few pages back, I think) that presents a magnetic "compass" that moves overhead, giving us a real precession of the equinoxes, and ice ages and warm centuries.

This All The Science have on the front page

Why even waste time.

 

[grav]

What are stars? Even flatearthers can't agree on what those shiny lights are.
mos def not "suns" like the big thing that is causing so much trouble lately with solar radiation and other mischiefs. :-[

My star guess has, for some time, been >> computer components.
It seems like you can't buy any electric device now without those tiny led lights that have no purpose. Even my Shark vac has one that blinks constantly.

As a big fan of Myth-as-History, I also reckon gnostic, Greek, Norse "gods" were either programmers or players in the Tron Matrix computer game.
Stars might be electeonic doohickeys which spy on us or somehow operate code commands. in the Big motherboard in the sky.
One wandering star (planet) is especially interesting. It has rings of ___? that look a lot like an antenna that communicates or even controls the whole push. And who runs that particular computer chip?

 

[grav]

Matter is electricity? How? Give me an example of electricity being transformed into physical substance. Not the application of electricity to something that already exists.

Since I first read your objection, I've been looking for a better defiition of the aether than my clumsy electric comparison.
I may as well ask Grok to tell us what reality is.

Walt Whitman wrote "I Sing the Body Electric" to celebrate the physical life and all that Transcendental jazz.
Plato's cave was a place where prisoners believed the shadows on the wall were physical objects.
I myself gave up a science career many moons ago when I took college chemistry, then floundered around in journalism and economics. Friends talked me out of taking astronomy. Thank goodness.
Only when I studied great writers under great instructors did I learn that I existed in a false reality.
I KNEW in elementary and high school that the Great Circle of Navigation was a lie, that the Atom theory was ridiculous, and that many of my teachers were clueless pretenders.

I had heard of the aether but never tried to connect the idea with conventional physics which separated matter from radiation.
Much later, when I ran across gnostic creation myths, I came to think of reality as an " emanation" from another dimeneion.
The hologram projection which was/-is transmitted through Mount Meru at the North Pole.

Pardon another stroll down a literary source, but I am reminded of a sci-fi novel, The Mote in God's Eye.
Because that's how I see reality. Like teeny motes of dust or whatever that sparkly stuff is we sometimes see dancing in light coming through a window
Maybe a better word is the "atom" but NOT that nucleus and electron shell structure I rejected decades ago.
Maybe "particle" can be taken to mean the smallest unit of the aether. Maybe that's the basis of David Wilcock's book, "Source Field Investigations."
Electricity is one manifestation of it. Radiation, matter, plasma, and intelligence are other forms by which the aether constructs our physical world.
This is not an original theory. But finding a source that expounds it clearly...... still looking.

 

[Breizh]

I had heard of the aether ...
Much later, ... I came to think of reality as an " emanation" from another dimeneion.
Electricity is one manifestation of it. Radiation, matter, plasma, and intelligence are other forms by which the aether constructs our physical world.

I always liked the description of matter being slowed down light. Plants turn sunlight into energy. Animals & humans eat plants. Some animals & humans eat animals (even plants: Venus flytrap). Some humans opt for a more "direct" approach from sunlight. Clearly there's more to sunlight than meets the eye.

This is not an original theory. But finding a source that expounds it clearly...... still looking.

It might be worthwhile taking one of the original psychedelics and seeing it for yourself. This would be the most sensible & straightforward approach.

 

[grav]

It might be worthwhile taking one of the original psychedelics and seeing it for yourself. This would be the most sensible & straightforward approach.

psycho- delics? me? not. But if I got knocked out cold as a wedge -- like a blow to the head -- hmm, maybe I could see the light.
Not a joke. If I could find my copy of David Wilcock's book, I'd quote from one passage which described a similar thing. A woman had suffered a serious brain injury and when she came to, she said that she was not quite unconscious all that time. She saw the world around her as an ocean of sorts, where everything was connected in her vision. In other words, she saw the aether.
A translucent "solid" mass of atoms/particles/units of what Wilcock called the source field.
Again, if the hologram projection emanates a "light" - or radiation - or energy - or other term ---- then we might begin to understand how our matrix really works. and its scientific nomenclature. The name's the thing. A rose is a rose is a rose.
or is it ?
Years ago, one of my students told me how she got her name, Shenita. When she was born, people kept asking her mother what she was going to call her daughter. "She need a name." And that went on her birth certificate. I have a tendency to say that a lot when I can't think of a word to define a thing, or a Form, I say Aha! She need a name. aka Sheneeda, the basic smallest piece of the Aether. or maybe SFU (Source Field Unit) ?

sobrief.com
SoBrief: 26,000+ Free Book Summaries | Audio, PDF & EPUB › books › the-source-field-investigations

The Source Field Investigations | Summary, Quotes, Audio
Mar 13, 2025This "Source Field," as Wilcock terms it, is the foundation of all space, time, matter, energy, biology, and consciousness. This perspective aligns with ancient spiritual teachings that emphasize the interconnectedness of all

 

[Just]

psycho- delics? me? not. But if I got knocked out cold as a wedge -- like a blow to the head -- hmm, maybe I could see the light.
Not a joke. If I could find my copy of David Wilcock's book, I'd quote from one passage which described a similar thing. A woman had suffered a serious brain injury and when she came to, she said that she was not quite unconscious all that time. She saw the world around her as an ocean of sorts, where everything was connected in her vision. In other words, she saw the aether.
A translucent "solid" mass of atoms/particles/units of what Wilcock called the source field.
Again, if the hologram projection emanates a "light" - or radiation - or energy - or other term ---- then we might begin to understand how our matrix really works. and its scientific nomenclature. The name's the thing. A rose is a rose is a rose.
or is it ?
Years ago, one of my students told me how she got her name, Shenita. When she was born, people kept asking her mother what she was going to call her daughter. "She need a name." And that went on her birth certificate. I have a tendency to say that a lot when I can't think of a word to define a thing, or a Form, I say Aha! She need a name. aka Sheneeda, the basic smallest piece of the Aether. or maybe SFU (Source Field Unit) ?

sobrief.com
SoBrief: 26,000+ Free Book Summaries | Audio, PDF & EPUB › books › the-source-field-investigations

The Source Field Investigations | Summary, Quotes, Audio
Mar 13, 2025This "Source Field," as Wilcock terms it, is the foundation of all space, time, matter, energy, biology, and consciousness. This perspective aligns with ancient spiritual teachings that emphasize the interconnectedness of all

About the woman knocked unconscious and seeing the aether, as a type 1 insulin-dependent diabetic I once got so close to passing out with very low blood sugar - at a level that I couldn’t function at and close to slipping into unconsciousness- and it affected my vision so that everything was distorted. Roads became rivers and everything seemed to be moving like a current and not static as if everything I saw revealed its energy field. I don’t know how else to explain it but it’s still a very vivid memory even after 30 years!

 

[Conciousness_Arise]

I was never satisfied with the fact that I could never, ever see the so-called milky way in the sky. I've been in places that are away from lights and I still haven't seen anything but a great blackness with usual white dots that we call stars. Some people claim they have seen it with their own eyes but that you have to be somewhere stupidly remote. I can be in the middle of the countryside where there are zero lights and still not fucking see anything resembling the pictures we are shown.
View attachment 35457

Even I were to witness it one day, it could honestly be anything.

Stories of old, that have become mythos, say it was a rift in the firmament that opened up during a cataclysmic event. The same story, told around the world. Personally, I find more truth in "mythos", than I do with the lazy explanations espoused by the current narrative purveyors.

 

[Conciousness_Arise]

psycho- delics? me? not. But if I got knocked out cold as a wedge -- like a blow to the head -- hmm, maybe I could see the light.
Not a joke. If I could find my copy of David Wilcock's book, I'd quote from one passage which described a similar thing. A woman had suffered a serious brain injury and when she came to, she said that she was not quite unconscious all that time. She saw the world around her as an ocean of sorts, where everything was connected in her vision. In other words, she saw the aether.
A translucent "solid" mass of atoms/particles/units of what Wilcock called the source field.
Again, if the hologram projection emanates a "light" - or radiation - or energy - or other term ---- then we might begin to understand how our matrix really works. and its scientific nomenclature. The name's the thing. A rose is a rose is a rose.
or is it ?
Years ago, one of my students told me how she got her name, Shenita. When she was born, people kept asking her mother what she was going to call her daughter. "She need a name." And that went on her birth certificate. I have a tendency to say that a lot when I can't think of a word to define a thing, or a Form, I say Aha! She need a name. aka Sheneeda, the basic smallest piece of the Aether. or maybe SFU (Source Field Unit) ?

sobrief.com
SoBrief: 26,000+ Free Book Summaries | Audio, PDF & EPUB › books › the-source-field-investigations

The Source Field Investigations | Summary, Quotes, Audio
Mar 13, 2025This "Source Field," as Wilcock terms it, is the foundation of all space, time, matter, energy, biology, and consciousness. This perspective aligns with ancient spiritual teachings that emphasize the interconnectedness of all

When I meditate, and hit the Theta Wave, I can see the Aether. When the wind blows, I can see the air currents, ebbing, flowing and swirling around everything, and the outer glow around objects. Its really quite beautiful!

 

[grav]

Stories of old, that have become mythos, say it was a rift in the firmament that opened up during a cataclysmic event. The same story, told around the world. Personally, I find more truth in "mythos", than I do with the lazy explanations espoused by the current narrative purveyors.

I couldn't agree more. Myths are laughed at but they at least hint at or symbolize real past events.
oops. There I go again, using that word. " real"
In my world view, Advanced Beings created our matrix hologram. Their computer program may have been the time when they themselves emanated as the Titans, an exciting period portrayed by Greek, Norse, other myth-makers.
That may also have been when humans appeared, as Hesiod wrote about in his 5 ages of man. Golden, Silver, Bronze, Heroic, Iron. If these were actual distinct periods (or games), then we are in the Iron Age. And when did it begin ? Several alt history thinkers propose 1800 as the beginning of this reset.

The "current narrative purveyors" as you call them have, for some reason, given us a doozy of a timeline -- the Big Bang theory, evolution, fossil fuels, climate change, and many other " real" fairy tales.

 

[Seiya]

Since I first read your objection, I've been looking for a better defiition of the aether than my clumsy electric comparison.
I may as well ask Grok to tell us what reality is.

Walt Whitman wrote "I Sing the Body Electric" to celebrate the physical life and all that Transcendental jazz.
Plato's cave was a place where prisoners believed the shadows on the wall were physical objects.
I myself gave up a science career many moons ago when I took college chemistry, then floundered around in journalism and economics. Friends talked me out of taking astronomy. Thank goodness.
Only when I studied great writers under great instructors did I learn that I existed in a false reality.
I KNEW in elementary and high school that the Great Circle of Navigation was a lie, that the Atom theory was ridiculous, and that many of my teachers were clueless pretenders.

I had heard of the aether but never tried to connect the idea with conventional physics which separated matter from radiation.
Much later, when I ran across gnostic creation myths, I came to think of reality as an " emanation" from another dimeneion.
The hologram projection which was/-is transmitted through Mount Meru at the North Pole.

Pardon another stroll down a literary source, but I am reminded of a sci-fi novel, The Mote in God's Eye.
Because that's how I see reality. Like teeny motes of dust or whatever that sparkly stuff is we sometimes see dancing in light coming through a window
Maybe a better word is the "atom" but NOT that nucleus and electron shell structure I rejected decades ago.
Maybe "particle" can be taken to mean the smallest unit of the aether. Maybe that's the basis of David Wilcock's book, "Source Field Investigations."
Electricity is one manifestation of it. Radiation, matter, plasma, and intelligence are other forms by which the aether constructs our physical world.
This is not an original theory. But finding a source that expounds it clearly...... still looking.

But I didn't question the definition of aether or the definition of anything.

I questioned your statements. Why don't you answer instead of writing these things? And what's worse, it's not even funny.

You can't. That's not your goal here. Your goal is to distance people from acquiring understanding and truth. Using the same repetitive methods.

That's what's real and that's reality.

It doesn't matter how many names you cite who wrote or said about anything. As if what "Walt Whitman wrote" or "the basis of David Wilcock's book" or "AllTheScience suggested" or "Plato's philosophy" or "George Orwell spelled out" (only on this page) is evidence or fact of anything.

"Simulation projection" is the new "Space", the same deception. But of course it's the same, it comes from the same source.

 

[grav]

You can't. That's not your goal here. Your goal is to distance people from acquiring understanding and truth. Using the same repetitive methods.

Let me get this straight. My goal is to hide understanding and truth? I am, therefore, in your opinion, a liar. Right ?
And I have not answered your specific questions -- about what?
Frankly, I find your posts to be rambling and pointless diatribes. Such as equating 'simulation projection' with 'space' -- which I assume you mean outer space as presented by Nasa and the Body Scientific.
Not sure what "same repetitive methods" refers to. My literary sourcee? If so, which sites and scholars should we accept?

As you know, this forum frowns on personal attacks, and I am surprised you made such a strong accusation of my motives.
I expect you to keep a more objective tone in future posts.

 

[grav]

oh, the irony.
Mr. Astronomy himself waxes poetic about our place in the Cosmos, where gravity forces planets to vortex around the sun.
His analogy might be right on, except for that mote of dust dealio.
It's suspended in a sunbeam. It floats. Sometimes it dances prettily with other motes when golden sunlight shines through your window.
Let's add another anti-gravity phenom to our list. Clouds. Smoke. Helium balloons, lighter-than-air gases. Dust motes.

 

[grav]

I have said before that earth itself is a torus. I will try to avoid making that mistake again.
The universe (not earth) has been called the Cosmic Egg, Yggdrasil tree, and other symbolic representations of the toroidal shape of the hologram projection. I realize that some people will never accept that Matrix movie concept. To me, it's the only way to make sense of existence, the aether, and what mainstream science calls the space-time continuum.
Likewise, the Big Bang theory which postulates the Nothing which exploded and created stars and planets and consciousness.
"They" do tell us the truth, but in such distorted theories and fake facts that we must unravel to discover the truth.

Now, back to earth's true size........ I will try to find images to illustrate the scope of the torus universe and its central accretion disk, which is the Infinite Plane. To call it a torus is probably inaccurate, since it's not exactly electric. It's the Aether.

Most FE researchers agree that the earth sits in the Infinite Plane like a crater (Vibes of Cosmos explores this idea).
The diameter of our world is about 12,000 miles, while the globe model is 8,000 miles in width.
Halve that number to get the radius, 6,000 miles.
That distance would therefore be the top of the dome/firmament. This is probably where the stars are "fixed" in that outermost layer of the so-called 7 heavens.

Flat earth is not a sphere. But if we look at the dome, we do see a hemisphere.
Once again, science blurs vocabulary in order to mystify the truth.

 

[AntiSoof]

The following is a thought exercise, and therefore not something I've fully considered.

Consciousness could perhaps be considered something material. In the sense that we consider everything in our universe as something material. It could be the result of observing, recording, recalling, and interpreting previous events.

For example: A microbe like a fungus or a bacterium, viewed in this light, also has consciousness because it chooses what tastes best; one thing is tasty, and the other isn't. So it's either yes (tasty) or no (not tasty).

Consciousness then seems to be the result of yes/no choices.The fact that our brain builds a whole story around it may be because we use words that we connect to images, smell, hearing, and so on.

When we see something, no one sees within us; there is no seer, no self; the seeing is done by the body. The brain projects the image and makes the choice, for example, good (yes) or bad (no).

Suppose someone likes chocolate. When he sees licorice (and it doesn't like it), the brain says no, but when it sees chocolate, the brain says yes. Seeing, smelling, or thinking about that chocolate automatically makes the mouth water, the body starts to feel good, and it wants to eat it.

Because we maybe don't understand this process, we give it mystical or spiritual terms.

Viewed this experimental way, we can see our taste, along with our sight, smell, and so on, as yes/no decisions. And viewed this way, a lot of nature must have such 'consciousness,' because consciousness, in this sense, stems from memory. Somewhere, something must be fixed that is yes and what is no. And that is in memory.

A plant, for example, also has memory in this sense because it behaves that way. For example, when it gets colder, it goes into hibernation. Is that consciousness? I think so.

Viewed this way, many more should have consciousness, I think, because many things have memory. Plants, animals, microbes, but perhaps also stars, the earth, the moon, and so on, could have memory.

Anything that possesses memory and uses that memory to anticipate something has something we might call consciousness.

Things that are very old and have frequently renewed themselves (death and birth), in this light, seem to me to possess something akin to consciousness. So things that die and are reborn ("again," as in the case of a being, bacterium, human, animal, and so on) can develop consciousness sooner than "dead" things that don't renew themselves and are therefore not "alive," such as stones.

So the sea would or could have consciousness, the universe, and so on. As long as it dies, dead in the sense that it no longer exists, yet returns with properties of a previous existence.

Because the definition I'm using now is a memory that has learned to choose and to anticipate it later. Memory can consist of cells or water or whatever, as long as it persists and as long as it has learned to choose like a computer does; 0 or 1, no or yes.

This is a mental exercise I sometimes engage in, but it's difficult. It seems about right to me.So, in fact, there's nothing but illusion that we sometimes worry about. And especially the rich and the scoundrels who call the shots seems rather trapped in that material illusion. But yes, seen this way, it's nature, something we also are, and nature is. Can you jump high or low, see the earth as round or flat, it makes no difference.

 

[Tomkat]

View attachment 35489

oh, the irony.
Mr. Astronomy himself waxes poetic about our place in the Cosmos, where gravity forces planets to vortex around the sun.
His analogy might be right on, except for that mote of dust dealio.
It's suspended in a sunbeam. It floats. Sometimes it dances prettily with other motes when golden sunlight shines through your window.
Let's add another anti-gravity phenom to our list. Clouds. Smoke. Helium balloons, lighter-than-air gases. Dust motes.

Also Grav, just to add, this Carl Sagan stuff is like all the other space stuff whereby they want us to feel insignificant and tiny in the middle of vast nowhere....f you Carl, maybe I remember other worlds and other lives smarty pants....Neil dumbass Tyson same mo....

 

[Breizh]

This seems appropriate here...

In this article we will delve back into our discussion of Aether science, focusing on the toroidal flow process of Aether units...

Thus according to quantum field theory, even the vacuum has a vastly complex structure and all calculations of quantum field theory must be made in relation to this model of the vacuum.”¹

Note that the vacuum energy exists at every point in space. What is this vacuum energy but a space medium! What is a space medium but the Aether!

Remember, it is admitted by mainstream science that the “fluctuating zero-point fields lead to a kind of reintroduction of an aether in physics, since some systems can detect the existence of this energy”.² Yet the properties of this ‘aether’ is highly debated.

Mainstream science (through Wikipedia in this case) is basically coming right out and telling us that quantum mechanics demands an aether must exist, but it cannot contradict Einstein’s theory of general relativity (GR).

As we saw in the past several articles there are so many flaws with Einstein’s theory of general relativity that GR needs to be reevaluated and adjusted to new advancements in Aether science, not the other way around!

In Aether science, instead of simple harmonic oscillators at each point, we have Aether “units” at each point.

These oscillators, or Aether units, are wave patterns in a field of probabilities, not particle points. They result from Aether flow. The intersecting and interfering waves from the inflow of Aether and the outflow of Aether create the toroidal vortex structure that is represented by the ‘harmonic oscillators’. These oscillators are spinning/rotating and oscillating spheres.

This movement creates the torus shape. The torus is composed of Aether just a whirlpool going down a drain is composed of water, or how a tornado is composed of varying pressures of air. The torus is inseparable from the Aether just as water is inseparable from the wave. Structure and function are inextricably connected.

Embedded within every spinning torus are all the Platonic solid geometries that act as the energetic framework upon which matter is built.

They key to understand the next ten articles is that the Aether has a geometric shape, or as Buckminster Fuller puts it, Space has shape!

This is admitted in mainstream science: “Even the vacuum has a vastly complex structure.”³

The ‘vacuum’ in mainstream science refers to “empty space” or space-time.

This structure or geometry results from spinning/rotating spheres. Rotating spheres equals toroids. Around the spheres geometry forms. This geometry is Platonic solid geometry, Archimedean solid geometry and their associated duals, stellations, compounds and combinations.

Article 101A: Physics - Aether Units - Part 4 - The Torus & Dan Winter - Cosmic Core

 

[AntiSoof]

This seems appropriate here...











Article 101A: Physics - Aether Units - Part 4 - The Torus & Dan Winter - Cosmic Core

"These waves formed by consciousness – whether Cosmic consciousness or individual consciousness – fall far outside the known electromagnetic spectrum and are beyond our current capacity of detection and measurement.

We have no current way (that we know of) to measure the ‘energy’ type or content of consciousness, but this ‘Source energy’ is what is fluctuating the Aether. Consciousness puts the Aether in motion on subquantum scales. This motion creates the toroidal flow process we refer to as the fundamental fluctuators.


These fluctuators represent processes, not things, and are essence-units (Aether units) of unimaginable minuteness and serve as the precursors of all matter and life.


In fact, this fluctuating toroidal flow process produces photons that then form subatomic particles that coalesce into atoms, molecules and matter. We will discuss this process in detail throughout these articles.".

What does that mean? That all IS consciousness?

(Is it a coincidence that I was talking about that above?)

 

[grav]

Way too much philosophy and quantum physics to absorb in one page! But even when I was a little kid I thought that everything had a consciousness. a leaf, a paper straw, a rock. Gnostics might say it's all the One, or Pleroma ? which is composed of fractals.
Cosmic consciousness, for one, rang a bell.
It reminded me of the Akasha, which some people say is the outer limit of our realm.
I first heard about it years ago when someone said that when we die, our spirits go up to the Akasha where they report on their experiences or are judged -- after which their memories are erased and they fall back into the womb to reincarnate.

I've also seen it compared to the computer motherboard, or some other computer component. That physicality does not compute if we think of reality as a simulation.


Wikipedia

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia › wiki › Akasha

Akasha - Wikipedia
Akasha means aether or space in Sanskrit and is one of the five elements in Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism. It also has a role in Western occultism and spiritualism as the first principle of the cosmos.



Eastern Spirituality

Eastern Spirituality › glossary › spirituality-terms › a-definitions › akasha

Akasha - Definitions of Buddhist & Vedic/Hindu terms Hinduism Buddhism
Akasha is the Sanskrit word for the first element in creation, which has the quality of sound. It is also the name of the first arūpa jhāna in Buddhism, meaning infinite space.