Let me get this straight. My goal is to hide understanding and truth? I am, therefore, in your opinion, a liar. Right ?
And I have not answered your specific questions -- about what?
Frankly, I find your posts to be rambling and pointless diatribes. Such as equating 'simulation projection' with 'space' -- which I assume you mean outer space as presented by Nasa and the Body Scientific.
Not sure what "same repetitive methods" refers to. My literary sourcee? If so, which sites and scholars should we accept?
As you know, this forum frowns on personal attacks, and I am surprised you made such a strong accusation of my motives.
I expect you to keep a more objective tone in future posts.
Sr. you made a post containing information and a statement in a forum, and I questioned you about the evidence supporting it. That's the function of a forum. You don’t have to answer anything.
If you disagree with something I had said, simply present evidence or facts. But there we go, playing the victim card.
There is no personal attack, as personal attack meaning
"An abusive remark about a person, without supporting evidence."
Because this is something that is always present in "Flat Earth," affecting the development of our understanding of our world, with distractions and conflicts I will point this out every time I identify it.
This is done by
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) It uses basic principles of communication techniques to bring change in thinking and behavior. I am writing about the
NLP in this thread to everyone who seeks to learn, seeks to the truth of our history. If we don't have an understanding about
NLP at least the basics, we will never even get close to the truth, and instead we will go from one rabbit hole to another.
The use of term
“Let me get this straight” is not used to confirm understanding of what was said, but rather to rewrite/ Reframing what was originally said/written while retaining key words but changing the meaning. When the meaning changes, responses and behaviors will also change.
Since technology no longer guarantees that people will believe the deception, the solution is to redirect those who are beginning to see the truth to another form of deception. Using something familiar and present in everyone's lives, but which the vast majority of people don't know how it works or only have minimal knowledge of.
Computer are the best way to go.
So now you leave
Infinite Space where your existence is irrelevant for
Simulation Projection which is also infinite and your existence is irrelevant with the additional psychological element
"you are a victim, because you are trapped in this "planet prison" or
Holographic world.
Now guess what's used in Neuro-linguistic programming modeling? Mathematics and holography. Which is nothing more than words, numbers, and illusions combined AKA
spell,
MAGIC but in this case
witchcraft
If you want to know more about Neuro-linguistic programming looking for Richard Bandler. Is Richard Bandler a "the chosen ones”? Yes or Yes. Of course he is. The first time Neuro-linguistic programming appeared of in Richard Bandler and John Grinder's book
The Structure of Magic I (1975).
I wrote this post not as a response or justification to
@grav , he continues to distort what I said, and will continue to do so. That's how it is. I wrote to share with everyone who is unaware of this important aspect that is being camouflaged, preventing those who seek to understand and learn about Flat Earth and the truth about our world from doing so. I'm not teaching, I'm sharing essential information that I learned thanks to someone who did the same. Only together do we learn and improve. And together doesn't mean the cartoonish idea of "loving everyone, everyone is my brother."
I found this the best explanation (as I’m not good in explain)
What logical fallacy is this kind of deflection? On the surface, it's not targeted at a person, so it's not really an ad hominem argument. It seems to target the person's argument itself, so it's not a strawman argument either. What it only does is to mischaracterize a valid criticism and deems its tone or framing "mean," "snide," "rude," "personal," or "disrespectful," therefore worthy of dismissal.