Flat Earth

[Lightseeker]

Something weird about that. Almost like they are hiding something. Or just plain fakery going on.

It is for this reason that I find the speculation about the polar regions so fascinating. It is obvious to me that something is being hidden, but what?

The answer probably lies in what ancient cultures believed to be at the North Pole.

As for Antarctica, several people have claimed that there is land beyond it. And if that is the case, then it cannot just a frozen continent, but a limit of sorts.

I am 100% convinced that there is land beyond Antartica, but we'll never know for sure, because our controllers won't allow anyone to go there. That said, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the shape of this plain is more like the 'Disney Map' than a round 'pancake'.

View attachment 5365​

That said, it can't be proven either.
People have been quick to say that the U.N Flag is more like the plain we live on, but I don't even think that's true. It's just a urinated-on breadcrumb, IMHO.

I think I was about 6 years old when my Dad told me that we live on a spinning ball. I thought he was mad. However, like everyone else, we get indoctrinated into this system of nonsense. All NASA has to do is give us just ONE picture of the Earth from 'space', and we'd all go away.

It was actually the 'Mandela Effect' that 'woke me up' (quite profoundly in fact), and then it was the topic of 'flat-Earth'. I even helped a friend of mine (who had a flat-Earth YT channelat the time) do some laser experiments.
To this day I still can't beLIEve how many people still hold on to the official (fake) narrative.

What came out of the laser experiments?

We did the experiments across large bodies of water. It's 'flat', lol

I believe Earth to be flat, and that there is land beyond the antarctic wall.
It is very likely that once governments had the technology to see what is up and out there, they started to push the narrative the average person believes in. That said, knowing what the average person is like, it is likely that they wouldn't give a shit if the truth came out.
"Earth is flat? Lmao who cares. I'm watching Netflix, don't bother me."

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

 

[grav]

regarding the Arctic and Antarctic,
I used to collect videos and articles and images in a FE research thread on another forum. The thread was closed and the topic is heavily censored now.

Over the years, many of the videos have disappeared, as well as other information.
In particular, an old and very brief black-and-white video of a plane flying close to the North Pole, out of which a giant beam of energy was projecting.

Was that real or was it fake?
It may still be out there but I can't find it.
"Ancient" cultures often portrayed the earth, or our part of it, as a roundish realm with a central power source. Mt. Meru of Hindu and Buddhist cosmology, the Norse Yggdrasil tree, the Axis Mundi, and other views of a central pillar holding up the sky.

In the Electric Universe theory, we possibly see a saltwater battery with layers of materials that conduct energy which the dome receives, moves, acts as a computer circuit board.
Next, we may as well ask, who knows how this all works? Nasa?
Google Earth surely hides it. There used to be several videos exposing the glitches in their software.

As usual, the image I tried to embed is messed up.
I'll try to fix it. What a complicated process it is.

​

 

[Starman]

Something weird about that. Almost like they are hiding something. Or just plain fakery going on.

It is for this reason that I find the speculation about the polar regions so fascinating. It is obvious to me that something is being hidden, but what?

The answer probably lies in what ancient cultures believed to be at the North Pole.

As for Antarctica, several people have claimed that there is land beyond it. And if that is the case, then it cannot just a frozen continent, but a limit of sorts.

I am 100% convinced that there is land beyond Antartica, but we'll never know for sure, because our controllers won't allow anyone to go there. That said, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the shape of this plain is more like the 'Disney Map' than a round 'pancake'.

View attachment 5365​

That said, it can't be proven either.
People have been quick to say that the U.N Flag is more like the plain we live on, but I don't even think that's true. It's just a urinated-on breadcrumb, IMHO.

I think I was about 6 years old when my Dad told me that we live on a spinning ball. I thought he was mad. However, like everyone else, we get indoctrinated into this system of nonsense. All NASA has to do is give us just ONE picture of the Earth from 'space', and we'd all go away.

It was actually the 'Mandela Effect' that 'woke me up' (quite profoundly in fact), and then it was the topic of 'flat-Earth'. I even helped a friend of mine (who had a flat-Earth YT channelat the time) do some laser experiments.
To this day I still can't beLIEve how many people still hold on to the official (fake) narrative.

What came out of the laser experiments?

We did the experiments across large bodies of water. It's 'flat', lol

I believe Earth to be flat, and that there is land beyond the antarctic wall.
It is very likely that once governments had the technology to see what is up and out there, they started to push the narrative the average person believes in. That said, knowing what the average person is like, it is likely that they wouldn't give a shit if the truth came out.
"Earth is flat? Lmao who cares. I'm watching Netflix, don't bother me."

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

For all the countries of the world to agree that Antarctica is off limits, there must be more to the story than simply undiscovered land. Since when did empires agree to keep their hands off new territory?

No, there is something there that would open a big can of worms if it was accessed. The attempt to go there already happened with Germany and the U.S. during the WWII era, and everybody backed off and eventually a worldwide agreement was made to bury the whole issue.

My hunch is that 'we' found evidence of a previous civilization, call it Hyperborea or whatever, or else there was an active civilization discovered that told us to bugger off. A treaty was made to close off the place and all the nations of the world agreed, because they couldn't stomach letting their people know of an alternate story of earth history. It was better for our rulers to keep to the story of a humanity confined to a ball earth with all lands already known.

We have the same story with the moon. All nations have agreed to the same fake storyline of what it is, where it is, and how we've already visited it. I believe some kind of treaty exists in order for no nation to be able to claim exclusive ownership of it.

For all nations to agree to such fake news, this is evidence of a worldwide conspiracy to deceive. We think the main story is nations vs. nations seeking dominance, but what supersedes that is the collusion to keep the general populace from knowing the true state of the cosmos.

For me, this is probably the biggest realization, knowing that there is a false dynamic that exists in the rulership of this domain. Surely, nations war on each other, but there's also a tacit admission that the primary job in a luciferian world is to keep the plebes in disarray. You can't lord over your population if it discovers its true origins and purpose. You can't have emancipation if you want to continue to harvest the well being of humanity.

So, amazing as it seems, the elite of all nations agree to keep their populace in the dark above all else. This secret is sealed by humanity's inability to wake up to the deception. We self-correct ourselves at this point because we have been thoroughly indoctrinated and get a steady dose of daily propaganda.

You'd think some ruler of a nation, at some point in time, would call BS on the whole affair, but the plebes are too deep in delusion and that person would only be called crazy and lose their power base for speaking out. So the charade continues and gets played time and time again. I'm not buying it.

So, my dear SH friends - for those that have woken up to these deceptions I say hurray! CONgratulations that you have already figured out this piece of the puzzle.

I think the ball earth is just one more dissonant reality that leaves people purposely confused.

Add to that our most used map these days have completely removed the ice pack up top(middle) and thoroughly obscured the bottom(edge) and as we know Greenland is now whiteland!

View attachment 5361​

View attachment 5360​

This is with the gamma adjusted,

View attachment 5362​

Weird looking configuration of the pole as a 360 view. Tell me why the pole image is so funky, focused on an orientation that is supposedly the center point of the pole. We could take any point on earth and do the same, but we wouldn't create such a splayed out, artificial shape.

For some reason we are accustomed to regard a pole as some sort of super-rounded-off and distorted place. That's where the rounded shape of the planet is most pronounced in our minds. But it's not, it's the same as any other point on a ball earth.

I feels like it's just one more mind trick, distorting what the pole areas are really like, drawing you in to figure it out, but trapping you with the whole notion of a pole.

I accept there is a north pole or at least a magnetic center of a realm, but another pole doesn't exist. Clues are found in the various fuckery going on with the distorted pole business. Poles are an artificial construct and the weirdness going on with them are a sign they are messing with us.

As seen on the old maps, there once was a central land, call it Hyperborea, at what we now call a pole. It was the center of our realm. I think it was Atlantis. Where it is now, I have no idea. It's either under the water, under the ice or wiped away, or maybe it's hidden in plain site, but we can't go there or get pictures of it.

Thinking more cosmically, is it possible that with enough trickery and mind enslavement we can't find it or see it, but if enough focus is given someday, it will appear to us? It's got to be somewhere.

 

[Citezenship]

Something weird about that. Almost like they are hiding something. Or just plain fakery going on.

It is for this reason that I find the speculation about the polar regions so fascinating. It is obvious to me that something is being hidden, but what?

The answer probably lies in what ancient cultures believed to be at the North Pole.

As for Antarctica, several people have claimed that there is land beyond it. And if that is the case, then it cannot just a frozen continent, but a limit of sorts.

I am 100% convinced that there is land beyond Antartica, but we'll never know for sure, because our controllers won't allow anyone to go there. That said, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the shape of this plain is more like the 'Disney Map' than a round 'pancake'.

View attachment 5365​

That said, it can't be proven either.
People have been quick to say that the U.N Flag is more like the plain we live on, but I don't even think that's true. It's just a urinated-on breadcrumb, IMHO.

I think I was about 6 years old when my Dad told me that we live on a spinning ball. I thought he was mad. However, like everyone else, we get indoctrinated into this system of nonsense. All NASA has to do is give us just ONE picture of the Earth from 'space', and we'd all go away.

It was actually the 'Mandela Effect' that 'woke me up' (quite profoundly in fact), and then it was the topic of 'flat-Earth'. I even helped a friend of mine (who had a flat-Earth YT channelat the time) do some laser experiments.
To this day I still can't beLIEve how many people still hold on to the official (fake) narrative.

What came out of the laser experiments?

We did the experiments across large bodies of water. It's 'flat', lol

I believe Earth to be flat, and that there is land beyond the antarctic wall.
It is very likely that once governments had the technology to see what is up and out there, they started to push the narrative the average person believes in. That said, knowing what the average person is like, it is likely that they wouldn't give a shit if the truth came out.
"Earth is flat? Lmao who cares. I'm watching Netflix, don't bother me."

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

For all the countries of the world to agree that Antarctica is off limits, there must be more to the story than simply undiscovered land. Since when did empires agree to keep their hands off new territory?

No, there is something there that would open a big can of worms if it was accessed. The attempt to go there already happened with Germany and the U.S. during the WWII era, and everybody backed off and eventually a worldwide agreement was made to bury the whole issue.

My hunch is that 'we' found evidence of a previous civilization, call it Hyperborea or whatever, or else there was an active civilization discovered that told us to bugger off. A treaty was made to close off the place and all the nations of the world agreed, because they couldn't stomach letting their people know of an alternate story of earth history. It was better for our rulers to keep to the story of a humanity confined to a ball earth with all lands already known.

We have the same story with the moon. All nations have agreed to the same fake storyline of what it is, where it is, and how we've already visited it. I believe some kind of treaty exists in order for no nation to be able to claim exclusive ownership of it.

For all nations to agree to such fake news, this is evidence of a worldwide conspiracy to deceive. We think the main story is nations vs. nations seeking dominance, but what supersedes that is the collusion to keep the general populace from knowing the true state of the cosmos.

For me, this is probably the biggest realization, knowing that there is a false dynamic that exists in the rulership of this domain. Surely, nations war on each other, but there's also a tacit admission that the primary job in a luciferian world is to keep the plebes in disarray. You can't lord over your population if it discovers its true origins and purpose. You can't have emancipation if you want to continue to harvest the well being of humanity.

So, amazing as it seems, the elite of all nations agree to keep their populace in the dark above all else. This secret is sealed by humanity's inability to wake up to the deception. We self-correct ourselves at this point because we have been thoroughly indoctrinated and get a steady dose of daily propaganda.

You'd think some ruler of a nation, at some point in time, would call BS on the whole affair, but the plebes are too deep in delusion and that person would only be called crazy and lose their power base for speaking out. So the charade continues and gets played time and time again. I'm not buying it.

So, my dear SH friends - for those that have woken up to these deceptions I say hurray! CONgratulations that you have already figured out this piece of the puzzle.

I think the ball earth is just one more dissonant reality that leaves people purposely confused.

Add to that our most used map these days have completely removed the ice pack up top(middle) and thoroughly obscured the bottom(edge) and as we know Greenland is now whiteland!

View attachment 5361​

View attachment 5360​

This is with the gamma adjusted,

View attachment 5362​

Weird looking configuration of the pole as a 360 view. Tell me why the pole image is so funky, focused on an orientation that is supposedly the center point of the pole. We could take any point on earth and do the same, but we wouldn't create such a splayed out, artificial shape.

For some reason we are accustomed to regard a pole as some sort of super-rounded-off and distorted place. That's where the rounded shape of the planet is most pronounced in our minds. But it's not, it's the same as any other point on a ball earth.

I feels like it's just one more mind trick, distorting what the pole areas are really like, drawing you in to figure it out, but trapping you with the whole notion of a pole.

I accept there is a north pole or at least a magnetic center of a realm, but another pole doesn't exist. Clues are found in the various fuckery going on with the distorted pole business. Poles are an artificial construct and the weirdness going on with them are a sign they are messing with us.

As seen on the old maps, there once was a central land, call it Hyperborea, at what we now call a pole. It was the center of our realm. I think it was Atlantis. Where it is now, I have no idea. It's either under the water, under the ice or wiped away, or maybe it's hidden in plain site, but we can't go there or get pictures of it.

Thinking more cosmically, is it possible that with enough trickery and mind enslavement we can't find it or see it, but if enough focus is given someday, it will appear to us? It's got to be somewhere.

Yes it's quite funny, i would imagine that there would in the southern hemisphere be a compass that points to the south pole because one that point to the north should be pointing down, or up depending on perspective.

I think there is a thing about needing a different compass in the south but it still point north,

https://www.spsnational.org/the-sps-observer/spring-summer/2016/compass-confusion-answers.

Couldn't agree more on the antarctic treaty, no way competing factions came together to stop exploration to stop exploitation or contamination, more like stop anyone seeing what is there or how long, big the wall is.

There was a Norwegian guy who tried but did not get very far!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jarle_Andhøy

 

[NigeWz]

Something weird about that. Almost like they are hiding something. Or just plain fakery going on.

It is for this reason that I find the speculation about the polar regions so fascinating. It is obvious to me that something is being hidden, but what?

The answer probably lies in what ancient cultures believed to be at the North Pole.

As for Antarctica, several people have claimed that there is land beyond it. And if that is the case, then it cannot just a frozen continent, but a limit of sorts.

I am 100% convinced that there is land beyond Antartica, but we'll never know for sure, because our controllers won't allow anyone to go there. That said, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the shape of this plain is more like the 'Disney Map' than a round 'pancake'.

View attachment 5365​

That said, it can't be proven either.
People have been quick to say that the U.N Flag is more like the plain we live on, but I don't even think that's true. It's just a urinated-on breadcrumb, IMHO.

I think I was about 6 years old when my Dad told me that we live on a spinning ball. I thought he was mad. However, like everyone else, we get indoctrinated into this system of nonsense. All NASA has to do is give us just ONE picture of the Earth from 'space', and we'd all go away.

It was actually the 'Mandela Effect' that 'woke me up' (quite profoundly in fact), and then it was the topic of 'flat-Earth'. I even helped a friend of mine (who had a flat-Earth YT channelat the time) do some laser experiments.
To this day I still can't beLIEve how many people still hold on to the official (fake) narrative.

What came out of the laser experiments?

We did the experiments across large bodies of water. It's 'flat', lol

I believe Earth to be flat, and that there is land beyond the antarctic wall.
It is very likely that once governments had the technology to see what is up and out there, they started to push the narrative the average person believes in. That said, knowing what the average person is like, it is likely that they wouldn't give a shit if the truth came out.
"Earth is flat? Lmao who cares. I'm watching Netflix, don't bother me."

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

No-one left anything on the Moon, because no-one ever went there.

Something weird about that. Almost like they are hiding something. Or just plain fakery going on.

It is for this reason that I find the speculation about the polar regions so fascinating. It is obvious to me that something is being hidden, but what?

The answer probably lies in what ancient cultures believed to be at the North Pole.

As for Antarctica, several people have claimed that there is land beyond it. And if that is the case, then it cannot just a frozen continent, but a limit of sorts.

I am 100% convinced that there is land beyond Antartica, but we'll never know for sure, because our controllers won't allow anyone to go there. That said, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the shape of this plain is more like the 'Disney Map' than a round 'pancake'.

View attachment 5365​

That said, it can't be proven either.
People have been quick to say that the U.N Flag is more like the plain we live on, but I don't even think that's true. It's just a urinated-on breadcrumb, IMHO.

I think I was about 6 years old when my Dad told me that we live on a spinning ball. I thought he was mad. However, like everyone else, we get indoctrinated into this system of nonsense. All NASA has to do is give us just ONE picture of the Earth from 'space', and we'd all go away.

It was actually the 'Mandela Effect' that 'woke me up' (quite profoundly in fact), and then it was the topic of 'flat-Earth'. I even helped a friend of mine (who had a flat-Earth YT channelat the time) do some laser experiments.
To this day I still can't beLIEve how many people still hold on to the official (fake) narrative.

What came out of the laser experiments?

We did the experiments across large bodies of water. It's 'flat', lol

I believe Earth to be flat, and that there is land beyond the antarctic wall.
It is very likely that once governments had the technology to see what is up and out there, they started to push the narrative the average person believes in. That said, knowing what the average person is like, it is likely that they wouldn't give a shit if the truth came out.
"Earth is flat? Lmao who cares. I'm watching Netflix, don't bother me."

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

For all the countries of the world to agree that Antarctica is off limits, there must be more to the story than simply undiscovered land. Since when did empires agree to keep their hands off new territory?

No, there is something there that would open a big can of worms if it was accessed. The attempt to go there already happened with Germany and the U.S. during the WWII era, and everybody backed off and eventually a worldwide agreement was made to bury the whole issue.

My hunch is that 'we' found evidence of a previous civilization, call it Hyperborea or whatever, or else there was an active civilization discovered that told us to bugger off. A treaty was made to close off the place and all the nations of the world agreed, because they couldn't stomach letting their people know of an alternate story of earth history. It was better for our rulers to keep to the story of a humanity confined to a ball earth with all lands already known.

We have the same story with the moon. All nations have agreed to the same fake storyline of what it is, where it is, and how we've already visited it. I believe some kind of treaty exists in order for no nation to be able to claim exclusive ownership of it.

For all nations to agree to such fake news, this is evidence of a worldwide conspiracy to deceive. We think the main story is nations vs. nations seeking dominance, but what supersedes that is the collusion to keep the general populace from knowing the true state of the cosmos.

For me, this is probably the biggest realization, knowing that there is a false dynamic that exists in the rulership of this domain. Surely, nations war on each other, but there's also a tacit admission that the primary job in a luciferian world is to keep the plebes in disarray. You can't lord over your population if it discovers its true origins and purpose. You can't have emancipation if you want to continue to harvest the well being of humanity.

So, amazing as it seems, the elite of all nations agree to keep their populace in the dark above all else. This secret is sealed by humanity's inability to wake up to the deception. We self-correct ourselves at this point because we have been thoroughly indoctrinated and get a steady dose of daily propaganda.

You'd think some ruler of a nation, at some point in time, would call BS on the whole affair, but the plebes are too deep in delusion and that person would only be called crazy and lose their power base for speaking out. So the charade continues and gets played time and time again. I'm not buying it.

So, my dear SH friends - for those that have woken up to these deceptions I say hurray! CONgratulations that you have already figured out this piece of the puzzle.

I think the ball earth is just one more dissonant reality that leaves people purposely confused.

Add to that our most used map these days have completely removed the ice pack up top(middle) and thoroughly obscured the bottom(edge) and as we know Greenland is now whiteland!

View attachment 5361​

View attachment 5360​

This is with the gamma adjusted,

View attachment 5362​

Weird looking configuration of the pole as a 360 view. Tell me why the pole image is so funky, focused on an orientation that is supposedly the center point of the pole. We could take any point on earth and do the same, but we wouldn't create such a splayed out, artificial shape.

For some reason we are accustomed to regard a pole as some sort of super-rounded-off and distorted place. That's where the rounded shape of the planet is most pronounced in our minds. But it's not, it's the same as any other point on a ball earth.

I feels like it's just one more mind trick, distorting what the pole areas are really like, drawing you in to figure it out, but trapping you with the whole notion of a pole.

I accept there is a north pole or at least a magnetic center of a realm, but another pole doesn't exist. Clues are found in the various fuckery going on with the distorted pole business. Poles are an artificial construct and the weirdness going on with them are a sign they are messing with us.

As seen on the old maps, there once was a central land, call it Hyperborea, at what we now call a pole. It was the center of our realm. I think it was Atlantis. Where it is now, I have no idea. It's either under the water, under the ice or wiped away, or maybe it's hidden in plain site, but we can't go there or get pictures of it.

Thinking more cosmically, is it possible that with enough trickery and mind enslavement we can't find it or see it, but if enough focus is given someday, it will appear to us? It's got to be somewhere.

As much as it pains me to say it, I don't think we'll ever really KNOW. The maps that go way back are mostly different and bear no resemblance to the Jesuit-created globe.
As far as the poles are concerned, I think there's a big 'truth-drop' there. If this flat plain is a huge battery, then it makes sense that there's a North and South 'pole'. Furthermore, take a look at the image here. It's called a 'Cathedral', right? Could that word come from perhaps 'Cathode-ral'? Were the gold-domed 'Mosques' the anodes?
Was the 'mud-flood' / melted buildings, etc., all caused by a giant shorting-out of the whole electrical grid? Quite possibly, IMHO.

 

[Lightseeker]

Something weird about that. Almost like they are hiding something. Or just plain fakery going on.

It is for this reason that I find the speculation about the polar regions so fascinating. It is obvious to me that something is being hidden, but what?

The answer probably lies in what ancient cultures believed to be at the North Pole.

As for Antarctica, several people have claimed that there is land beyond it. And if that is the case, then it cannot just a frozen continent, but a limit of sorts.

I am 100% convinced that there is land beyond Antartica, but we'll never know for sure, because our controllers won't allow anyone to go there. That said, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the shape of this plain is more like the 'Disney Map' than a round 'pancake'.

View attachment 5365​

That said, it can't be proven either.
People have been quick to say that the U.N Flag is more like the plain we live on, but I don't even think that's true. It's just a urinated-on breadcrumb, IMHO.

I think I was about 6 years old when my Dad told me that we live on a spinning ball. I thought he was mad. However, like everyone else, we get indoctrinated into this system of nonsense. All NASA has to do is give us just ONE picture of the Earth from 'space', and we'd all go away.

It was actually the 'Mandela Effect' that 'woke me up' (quite profoundly in fact), and then it was the topic of 'flat-Earth'. I even helped a friend of mine (who had a flat-Earth YT channelat the time) do some laser experiments.
To this day I still can't beLIEve how many people still hold on to the official (fake) narrative.

What came out of the laser experiments?

We did the experiments across large bodies of water. It's 'flat', lol

I believe Earth to be flat, and that there is land beyond the antarctic wall.
It is very likely that once governments had the technology to see what is up and out there, they started to push the narrative the average person believes in. That said, knowing what the average person is like, it is likely that they wouldn't give a shit if the truth came out.
"Earth is flat? Lmao who cares. I'm watching Netflix, don't bother me."

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

No-one left anything on the Moon, because no-one ever went there.

Something weird about that. Almost like they are hiding something. Or just plain fakery going on.

It is for this reason that I find the speculation about the polar regions so fascinating. It is obvious to me that something is being hidden, but what?

The answer probably lies in what ancient cultures believed to be at the North Pole.

As for Antarctica, several people have claimed that there is land beyond it. And if that is the case, then it cannot just a frozen continent, but a limit of sorts.

I am 100% convinced that there is land beyond Antartica, but we'll never know for sure, because our controllers won't allow anyone to go there. That said, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the shape of this plain is more like the 'Disney Map' than a round 'pancake'.

View attachment 5365​

That said, it can't be proven either.
People have been quick to say that the U.N Flag is more like the plain we live on, but I don't even think that's true. It's just a urinated-on breadcrumb, IMHO.

I think I was about 6 years old when my Dad told me that we live on a spinning ball. I thought he was mad. However, like everyone else, we get indoctrinated into this system of nonsense. All NASA has to do is give us just ONE picture of the Earth from 'space', and we'd all go away.

It was actually the 'Mandela Effect' that 'woke me up' (quite profoundly in fact), and then it was the topic of 'flat-Earth'. I even helped a friend of mine (who had a flat-Earth YT channelat the time) do some laser experiments.
To this day I still can't beLIEve how many people still hold on to the official (fake) narrative.

What came out of the laser experiments?

We did the experiments across large bodies of water. It's 'flat', lol

I believe Earth to be flat, and that there is land beyond the antarctic wall.
It is very likely that once governments had the technology to see what is up and out there, they started to push the narrative the average person believes in. That said, knowing what the average person is like, it is likely that they wouldn't give a shit if the truth came out.
"Earth is flat? Lmao who cares. I'm watching Netflix, don't bother me."

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

For all the countries of the world to agree that Antarctica is off limits, there must be more to the story than simply undiscovered land. Since when did empires agree to keep their hands off new territory?

No, there is something there that would open a big can of worms if it was accessed. The attempt to go there already happened with Germany and the U.S. during the WWII era, and everybody backed off and eventually a worldwide agreement was made to bury the whole issue.

My hunch is that 'we' found evidence of a previous civilization, call it Hyperborea or whatever, or else there was an active civilization discovered that told us to bugger off. A treaty was made to close off the place and all the nations of the world agreed, because they couldn't stomach letting their people know of an alternate story of earth history. It was better for our rulers to keep to the story of a humanity confined to a ball earth with all lands already known.

We have the same story with the moon. All nations have agreed to the same fake storyline of what it is, where it is, and how we've already visited it. I believe some kind of treaty exists in order for no nation to be able to claim exclusive ownership of it.

For all nations to agree to such fake news, this is evidence of a worldwide conspiracy to deceive. We think the main story is nations vs. nations seeking dominance, but what supersedes that is the collusion to keep the general populace from knowing the true state of the cosmos.

For me, this is probably the biggest realization, knowing that there is a false dynamic that exists in the rulership of this domain. Surely, nations war on each other, but there's also a tacit admission that the primary job in a luciferian world is to keep the plebes in disarray. You can't lord over your population if it discovers its true origins and purpose. You can't have emancipation if you want to continue to harvest the well being of humanity.

So, amazing as it seems, the elite of all nations agree to keep their populace in the dark above all else. This secret is sealed by humanity's inability to wake up to the deception. We self-correct ourselves at this point because we have been thoroughly indoctrinated and get a steady dose of daily propaganda.

You'd think some ruler of a nation, at some point in time, would call BS on the whole affair, but the plebes are too deep in delusion and that person would only be called crazy and lose their power base for speaking out. So the charade continues and gets played time and time again. I'm not buying it.

So, my dear SH friends - for those that have woken up to these deceptions I say hurray! CONgratulations that you have already figured out this piece of the puzzle.

I think the ball earth is just one more dissonant reality that leaves people purposely confused.

Add to that our most used map these days have completely removed the ice pack up top(middle) and thoroughly obscured the bottom(edge) and as we know Greenland is now whiteland!

View attachment 5361​

View attachment 5360​

This is with the gamma adjusted,

View attachment 5362​

Weird looking configuration of the pole as a 360 view. Tell me why the pole image is so funky, focused on an orientation that is supposedly the center point of the pole. We could take any point on earth and do the same, but we wouldn't create such a splayed out, artificial shape.

For some reason we are accustomed to regard a pole as some sort of super-rounded-off and distorted place. That's where the rounded shape of the planet is most pronounced in our minds. But it's not, it's the same as any other point on a ball earth.

I feels like it's just one more mind trick, distorting what the pole areas are really like, drawing you in to figure it out, but trapping you with the whole notion of a pole.

I accept there is a north pole or at least a magnetic center of a realm, but another pole doesn't exist. Clues are found in the various fuckery going on with the distorted pole business. Poles are an artificial construct and the weirdness going on with them are a sign they are messing with us.

As seen on the old maps, there once was a central land, call it Hyperborea, at what we now call a pole. It was the center of our realm. I think it was Atlantis. Where it is now, I have no idea. It's either under the water, under the ice or wiped away, or maybe it's hidden in plain site, but we can't go there or get pictures of it.

Thinking more cosmically, is it possible that with enough trickery and mind enslavement we can't find it or see it, but if enough focus is given someday, it will appear to us? It's got to be somewhere.

As much as it pains me to say it, I don't think we'll ever really KNOW. The maps that go way back are mostly different and bear no resemblance to the Jesuit-created globe.
As far as the poles are concerned, I think there's a big 'truth-drop' there. If this flat plain is a huge battery, then it makes sense that there's a North and South 'pole'. Furthermore, take a look at the image here. It's called a 'Cathedral', right? Could that word come from perhaps 'Cathode-ral'? Were the gold-domed 'Mosques' the anodes?
Was the 'mud-flood' / melted buildings, etc., all caused by a giant shorting-out of the whole electrical grid? Quite possibly, IMHO.

View attachment 5401​

I wonder if Fulcanelli's book "the mistery of the cathedrals" could shed some light on this.

 

[NigeWz]

Something weird about that. Almost like they are hiding something. Or just plain fakery going on.

It is for this reason that I find the speculation about the polar regions so fascinating. It is obvious to me that something is being hidden, but what?

The answer probably lies in what ancient cultures believed to be at the North Pole.

As for Antarctica, several people have claimed that there is land beyond it. And if that is the case, then it cannot just a frozen continent, but a limit of sorts.

I am 100% convinced that there is land beyond Antartica, but we'll never know for sure, because our controllers won't allow anyone to go there. That said, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the shape of this plain is more like the 'Disney Map' than a round 'pancake'.

View attachment 5365​

That said, it can't be proven either.
People have been quick to say that the U.N Flag is more like the plain we live on, but I don't even think that's true. It's just a urinated-on breadcrumb, IMHO.

I think I was about 6 years old when my Dad told me that we live on a spinning ball. I thought he was mad. However, like everyone else, we get indoctrinated into this system of nonsense. All NASA has to do is give us just ONE picture of the Earth from 'space', and we'd all go away.

It was actually the 'Mandela Effect' that 'woke me up' (quite profoundly in fact), and then it was the topic of 'flat-Earth'. I even helped a friend of mine (who had a flat-Earth YT channelat the time) do some laser experiments.
To this day I still can't beLIEve how many people still hold on to the official (fake) narrative.

What came out of the laser experiments?

We did the experiments across large bodies of water. It's 'flat', lol

I believe Earth to be flat, and that there is land beyond the antarctic wall.
It is very likely that once governments had the technology to see what is up and out there, they started to push the narrative the average person believes in. That said, knowing what the average person is like, it is likely that they wouldn't give a shit if the truth came out.
"Earth is flat? Lmao who cares. I'm watching Netflix, don't bother me."

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

No-one left anything on the Moon, because no-one ever went there.

Something weird about that. Almost like they are hiding something. Or just plain fakery going on.

It is for this reason that I find the speculation about the polar regions so fascinating. It is obvious to me that something is being hidden, but what?

The answer probably lies in what ancient cultures believed to be at the North Pole.

As for Antarctica, several people have claimed that there is land beyond it. And if that is the case, then it cannot just a frozen continent, but a limit of sorts.

I am 100% convinced that there is land beyond Antartica, but we'll never know for sure, because our controllers won't allow anyone to go there. That said, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the shape of this plain is more like the 'Disney Map' than a round 'pancake'.

View attachment 5365​

That said, it can't be proven either.
People have been quick to say that the U.N Flag is more like the plain we live on, but I don't even think that's true. It's just a urinated-on breadcrumb, IMHO.

I think I was about 6 years old when my Dad told me that we live on a spinning ball. I thought he was mad. However, like everyone else, we get indoctrinated into this system of nonsense. All NASA has to do is give us just ONE picture of the Earth from 'space', and we'd all go away.

It was actually the 'Mandela Effect' that 'woke me up' (quite profoundly in fact), and then it was the topic of 'flat-Earth'. I even helped a friend of mine (who had a flat-Earth YT channelat the time) do some laser experiments.
To this day I still can't beLIEve how many people still hold on to the official (fake) narrative.

What came out of the laser experiments?

We did the experiments across large bodies of water. It's 'flat', lol

I believe Earth to be flat, and that there is land beyond the antarctic wall.
It is very likely that once governments had the technology to see what is up and out there, they started to push the narrative the average person believes in. That said, knowing what the average person is like, it is likely that they wouldn't give a shit if the truth came out.
"Earth is flat? Lmao who cares. I'm watching Netflix, don't bother me."

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

For all the countries of the world to agree that Antarctica is off limits, there must be more to the story than simply undiscovered land. Since when did empires agree to keep their hands off new territory?

No, there is something there that would open a big can of worms if it was accessed. The attempt to go there already happened with Germany and the U.S. during the WWII era, and everybody backed off and eventually a worldwide agreement was made to bury the whole issue.

My hunch is that 'we' found evidence of a previous civilization, call it Hyperborea or whatever, or else there was an active civilization discovered that told us to bugger off. A treaty was made to close off the place and all the nations of the world agreed, because they couldn't stomach letting their people know of an alternate story of earth history. It was better for our rulers to keep to the story of a humanity confined to a ball earth with all lands already known.

We have the same story with the moon. All nations have agreed to the same fake storyline of what it is, where it is, and how we've already visited it. I believe some kind of treaty exists in order for no nation to be able to claim exclusive ownership of it.

For all nations to agree to such fake news, this is evidence of a worldwide conspiracy to deceive. We think the main story is nations vs. nations seeking dominance, but what supersedes that is the collusion to keep the general populace from knowing the true state of the cosmos.

For me, this is probably the biggest realization, knowing that there is a false dynamic that exists in the rulership of this domain. Surely, nations war on each other, but there's also a tacit admission that the primary job in a luciferian world is to keep the plebes in disarray. You can't lord over your population if it discovers its true origins and purpose. You can't have emancipation if you want to continue to harvest the well being of humanity.

So, amazing as it seems, the elite of all nations agree to keep their populace in the dark above all else. This secret is sealed by humanity's inability to wake up to the deception. We self-correct ourselves at this point because we have been thoroughly indoctrinated and get a steady dose of daily propaganda.

You'd think some ruler of a nation, at some point in time, would call BS on the whole affair, but the plebes are too deep in delusion and that person would only be called crazy and lose their power base for speaking out. So the charade continues and gets played time and time again. I'm not buying it.

So, my dear SH friends - for those that have woken up to these deceptions I say hurray! CONgratulations that you have already figured out this piece of the puzzle.

I think the ball earth is just one more dissonant reality that leaves people purposely confused.

Add to that our most used map these days have completely removed the ice pack up top(middle) and thoroughly obscured the bottom(edge) and as we know Greenland is now whiteland!

View attachment 5361​

View attachment 5360​

This is with the gamma adjusted,

View attachment 5362​

Weird looking configuration of the pole as a 360 view. Tell me why the pole image is so funky, focused on an orientation that is supposedly the center point of the pole. We could take any point on earth and do the same, but we wouldn't create such a splayed out, artificial shape.

For some reason we are accustomed to regard a pole as some sort of super-rounded-off and distorted place. That's where the rounded shape of the planet is most pronounced in our minds. But it's not, it's the same as any other point on a ball earth.

I feels like it's just one more mind trick, distorting what the pole areas are really like, drawing you in to figure it out, but trapping you with the whole notion of a pole.

I accept there is a north pole or at least a magnetic center of a realm, but another pole doesn't exist. Clues are found in the various fuckery going on with the distorted pole business. Poles are an artificial construct and the weirdness going on with them are a sign they are messing with us.

As seen on the old maps, there once was a central land, call it Hyperborea, at what we now call a pole. It was the center of our realm. I think it was Atlantis. Where it is now, I have no idea. It's either under the water, under the ice or wiped away, or maybe it's hidden in plain site, but we can't go there or get pictures of it.

Thinking more cosmically, is it possible that with enough trickery and mind enslavement we can't find it or see it, but if enough focus is given someday, it will appear to us? It's got to be somewhere.

As much as it pains me to say it, I don't think we'll ever really KNOW. The maps that go way back are mostly different and bear no resemblance to the Jesuit-created globe.
As far as the poles are concerned, I think there's a big 'truth-drop' there. If this flat plain is a huge battery, then it makes sense that there's a North and South 'pole'. Furthermore, take a look at the image here. It's called a 'Cathedral', right? Could that word come from perhaps 'Cathode-ral'? Were the gold-domed 'Mosques' the anodes?
Was the 'mud-flood' / melted buildings, etc., all caused by a giant shorting-out of the whole electrical grid? Quite possibly, IMHO.

View attachment 5401​

I wonder if Fulcanelli's book "the mistery of the cathedrals" could shed some light on this.

Not heard of it, but I will certainly check it out. Thanks.

 

[Lightseeker]

I remember having seen the Flammarion engraving as a teenager and being fascinated by the idea that a man reaches an outer border of the Earth and sees stuff we have never been neither taught or told about. Many years later as an adult man the image makes sense. Anyone else can relate?

 

[NigeWz]

View attachment 5403​

I remember having seen the Flammarion engraving as a teenager and being fascinated by the idea that a man reaches an outer border of the Earth and sees stuff we have never been neither taught or told about. Many years later as an adult man the image makes sense. Anyone else can relate?

Yes. This has a very deep and esoteric meaning that can't be explained in just a few sentences. If you read my post 'Deception Goes Back Further Than You Think' then it may answer a few of your questions. I am preparing for Part 2 of that thread, and will be posting it in a few days.

 

[grav]

under 3 minutes


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DTPD9jfkf0I

 

[Starman]

under 3 minutes


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DTPD9jfkf0I

Thanks for the video and the great music.

Stars supposedly give off their own light, so that is how we can see them. Planets are lit by the sun and hence we see these rocky bodies because of reflected light.

Does it make sense that a rocky planetary body millions and millions away would reflect enough light back to us so that we could see it? Those surfaces must be so shiny as to be like a mirror! Same goes for the moon.

 

[NigeWz]

under 3 minutes


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DTPD9jfkf0I

Thanks for the video and the great music.

Stars supposedly give off their own light, so that is how we can see them. Planets are lit by the sun and hence we see these rocky bodies because of reflected light.

Does it make sense that a rocky planetary body millions and millions away would reflect enough light back to us so that we could see it? Those surfaces must be so shiny as to be like a mirror! Same goes for the moon.

There's plenty of evidence on YT to show that planets are also either some kind of plasma, or energy shimmering in (what looks like) water).
There's zero REALevidence to show that there's anything 'rocky' up there.
A couple of years ago I was watching a Lunar eclipse from my friend's balcony in Australia.
Prior to the eclipse starting, the Moon was full, not too big, and quite dim. I stood and watched the Moon get covered, and slowly uncovered. Once the un-covering was complete, the Moon kind-of flickered (you know, like a fluorescent light strip flickers when you turn it on), then, it was full, much bigger, and really bright. Definitely source of its own light, IMHO.

 

[E.Bearclaw]

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

This is an easily proven bit of misinformation. If you read the link below, the laser moon experiment has been achieved since 1962. The first trip to the moon (manned) was 1969. Unmanned was 1966. Ergo if the Laser experiment can be done before we put a reflector on the moon, something else must be causing it.

Lunar Laser Ranging experiment - Wikipedia.

Furthermore, if you think about the speed the earth is rotating (1000mph at the equator), plus the speed everything is moving in space (earth & moon), it defies logic how one could hit the reflector and pick up its reflection also.

FWIW the results appear consistent with a possible reflection from a dome / firmament.

 

[Lightseeker]

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

This is an easily proven bit of misinformation. If you read the link below, the laser moon experiment has been achieved since 1962. The first trip to the moon (manned) was 1969. Unmanned was 1966. Ergo if the Laser experiment can be done before we put a reflector on the moon, something else must be causing it.

Lunar Laser Ranging experiment - Wikipedia.

Furthermore, if you think about the speed the earth is rotating (1000mph at the equator), plus the speed everything is moving in space (earth & moon), it defies logic how one could hit the reflector and pick up its reflection also.

FWIW the results appear consistent with a possible reflection from a dome / firmament.

My question had a bit of a provocative tone in it. As in, "yes, you did laser experiments, but what about those reflectors the detractors of the flat Earth theory put forward every time as a counter-argument?".

It is obvious that the moon isn't what we make it out to be. The very fact that a ball cannot reflect light in that way says a lot. Or the fact that the light of the moon doesn't have the same properties sunlight does.

 

[E.Bearclaw]

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

This is an easily proven bit of misinformation. If you read the link below, the laser moon experiment has been achieved since 1962. The first trip to the moon (manned) was 1969. Unmanned was 1966. Ergo if the Laser experiment can be done before we put a reflector on the moon, something else must be causing it.

Lunar Laser Ranging experiment - Wikipedia.

Furthermore, if you think about the speed the earth is rotating (1000mph at the equator), plus the speed everything is moving in space (earth & moon), it defies logic how one could hit the reflector and pick up its reflection also.

FWIW the results appear consistent with a possible reflection from a dome / firmament.

My question had a bit of a provocative tone in it. As in, "yes, you did laser experiments, but what about those reflectors the detractors of the flat Earth theory put forward every time as a counter-argument?".

It is obvious that the moon isn't what we make it out to be. The very fact that a ball cannot reflect light in that way says a lot. Or the fact that the light of the moon doesn't have the same properties sunlight does.

Yes, I did get that. I was just adding a bit of background information over the Laser / refraction test, for the purposes of collation in the thread, as that is one that can be easily disproved. Apologies if it read that I thought you were an advocate of the laser experiment.

For what it is worth - I think that disproving the laser / refraction experiment only PROVES that the idea we left such devices on the moon, and therefore must have been to the moon as incorrect. For me it would also IMPLY there is the possibility of a dome / firmament with refractive capabilities.

 

[Lightseeker]

For what it is worth - I think that disproving the laser / refraction experiment only PROVES that the idea we left such devices on the moon, and therefore must have been to the moon as incorrect. For me it would also IMPLY there is the possibility of a dome / firmament with refractive capabilities.

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

This is an easily proven bit of misinformation. If you read the link below, the laser moon experiment has been achieved since 1962. The first trip to the moon (manned) was 1969. Unmanned was 1966. Ergo if the Laser experiment can be done before we put a reflector on the moon, something else must be causing it.

Lunar Laser Ranging experiment - Wikipedia.

Furthermore, if you think about the speed the earth is rotating (1000mph at the equator), plus the speed everything is moving in space (earth & moon), it defies logic how one could hit the reflector and pick up its reflection also.

FWIW the results appear consistent with a possible reflection from a dome / firmament.

My question had a bit of a provocative tone in it. As in, "yes, you did laser experiments, but what about those reflectors the detractors of the flat Earth theory put forward every time as a counter-argument?".

It is obvious that the moon isn't what we make it out to be. The very fact that a ball cannot reflect light in that way says a lot. Or the fact that the light of the moon doesn't have the same properties sunlight does.

Yes, I did get that. I was just adding a bit of background information over the Laser / refraction test, for the purposes of collation in the thread, as that is one that can be easily disproved. Apologies if it read that I thought you were an advocate of the laser experiment.

For what it is worth - I think that disproving the laser / refraction experiment only PROVES that the idea we left such devices on the moon, and therefore must have been to the moon as incorrect. For me it would also IMPLY there is the possibility of a dome / firmament with refractive capabilities.

I don't remember know which ancient culture claims the dome to be made of molten glass.

It would explain why the milky way looks like a fissure on a glassy surface. As if something broke up there.

 

[E.Bearclaw]

For what it is worth - I think that disproving the laser / refraction experiment only PROVES that the idea we left such devices on the moon, and therefore must have been to the moon as incorrect. For me it would also IMPLY there is the possibility of a dome / firmament with refractive capabilities.

I thought you had done that other laser experiment wherein you point lasers at the reflectors the astronauts supposedly left on the moon.

This is an easily proven bit of misinformation. If you read the link below, the laser moon experiment has been achieved since 1962. The first trip to the moon (manned) was 1969. Unmanned was 1966. Ergo if the Laser experiment can be done before we put a reflector on the moon, something else must be causing it.

Lunar Laser Ranging experiment - Wikipedia.

Furthermore, if you think about the speed the earth is rotating (1000mph at the equator), plus the speed everything is moving in space (earth & moon), it defies logic how one could hit the reflector and pick up its reflection also.

FWIW the results appear consistent with a possible reflection from a dome / firmament.

My question had a bit of a provocative tone in it. As in, "yes, you did laser experiments, but what about those reflectors the detractors of the flat Earth theory put forward every time as a counter-argument?".

It is obvious that the moon isn't what we make it out to be. The very fact that a ball cannot reflect light in that way says a lot. Or the fact that the light of the moon doesn't have the same properties sunlight does.

Yes, I did get that. I was just adding a bit of background information over the Laser / refraction test, for the purposes of collation in the thread, as that is one that can be easily disproved. Apologies if it read that I thought you were an advocate of the laser experiment.

For what it is worth - I think that disproving the laser / refraction experiment only PROVES that the idea we left such devices on the moon, and therefore must have been to the moon as incorrect. For me it would also IMPLY there is the possibility of a dome / firmament with refractive capabilities.

I don't remember know which ancient culture claims the dome to be made of molten glass.

It would explain why the milky way looks like a fissure on a glassy surface. As if something broke up there.

Hmm. I wonder if that also explains where all the sand under the sea and on the deserts comes from. I would assume that if you can make glass from sand, then the reverse process is possible, even if beyond us at the minute.

 

[grav]

Was the 'mud-flood' / melted buildings, etc., all caused by a giant shorting-out of the whole electrical grid? Quite possibly, IMHO.

Trying to fit togrther puzzle pieces above, we have

shorting-out the whole electric grid,
plasma lights in the dome,
sand under ocean waters,
the Dark Rift of the Milky Way........

These points remind many of us of a closed system/terrarium/battery.

They are also copasetic with the resets throughout our stolen history.
Way before I heard about FE, I read Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision.
The remarkable book asserted that Venus sprang full-grown as a comet from the head of her father, Jupiter. She regularly plagued the earth with rains of fire and brimstone. Eventually Comet Venus settled down into a Fibonacci style orbit.

The time frame from creation to 2021 is much shorter than the insane millennia as claimed by the Status Quo. Multiple resets have altered earth's shape, construction, and life forms.

What initiates these macro alterations? Plasma events? Inevitable breakdowns of electrical systems? How do new world constructions come into being?
My best guess would be a computer program with scheduled reboots.

View: https://youtu.be/lZlSimsiPUA


I think it's fake, but who knows?

 

[Collapseinrealtime]

When MIchael Tellinger made a statement regarding his view on the side of FE, he had to come back with a video stating that its no use taking that position of something along those lines.

That's very interesting, considering that he basically describes a geocentric universe that is essentially a disc inside of a torus field. How much more off the fence can one get than that!

I have seen this kind of cowardly sidestepping with other "truthers", particularly Crrow777, describing the earth existing as a stationary plane, yet refusing to give any endorsement to the idea of a flat earth, as if in doing so he would suddenly either lose all credibility or be instantly lumped in with the mark sargent brand of disinfo agents that make "flat earthers" seem absolutely off their rockers. I think it may have to do with the fact that they make their living on the gift economy and on those that subscribe monthly to their paid content. By taking any radical stance they may risk losing some of their paying subscribers. I can't help but to conclude that they are part of a controlled opposition operation, even though the majority of their research tends to be of high quality.

 

[NigeWz]

Was the 'mud-flood' / melted buildings, etc., all caused by a giant shorting-out of the whole electrical grid? Quite possibly, IMHO.

Trying to fit togrther puzzle pieces above, we have

shorting-out the whole electric grid,
plasma lights in the dome,
sand under ocean waters,
the Dark Rift of the Milky Way........

These points remind many of us of a closed system/terrarium/battery.

They are also copasetic with the resets throughout our stolen history.
Way before I heard about FE, I read Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision.
The remarkable book asserted that Venus sprang full-grown as a comet from the head of her father, Jupiter. She regularly plagued the earth with rains of fire and brimstone. Eventually Comet Venus settled down into a Fibonacci style orbit.

The time frame from creation to 2021 is much shorter than the insane millennia as claimed by the Status Quo. Multiple resets have altered earth's shape, construction, and life forms.

What initiates these macro alterations? Plasma events? Inevitable breakdowns of electrical systems? How do new world constructions come into being?
My best guess would be a computer program with scheduled reboots.

View: https://youtu.be/lZlSimsiPUA


I think it's fake, but who knows?

There's more to the 'simulation / hologram' theory that most of us realise. While on the face of it it sounds silly, my long-asked question is this;
Why are kangaroos only found in Australia? Why are Pandas only found in China? ......the list goes on...... There's a small island off the coast of Western Australia called 'Rottnest'. Here, you'll find an animal called a 'quokka'. Apparently, they are not to be found anywhere else - not even on the Australian mainland.