SH Archive Mudflood: the Story of Two Tombs

[KD Archive]

This is one of those cases where the traditional history narrative makes no sense. We have two tombs to look at:

• 1. Tomb of the family of Statilius Taurus
  • Titus Statilius Taurus (I-IV): all 4 of them existed around 50 BC - 15 AD
  • Image source
• 2. Tomb of Cyrus the Great
  • Cyrus the Great: ruled 559–530 BC
  • Image source

​

KD: How would mainstream archaeologists explain why the above left ~2,000 y.o. tomb (1) was buried over its roof, but the above right ~2,600 y.o. one (2) did not accumulate any noticeable "cultural layer"?

• I think there is only one possible explanation, but I will leave it up to our forum members to voice their opinions.

Note: This OP was recovered from the Sh.org archive.

Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.

 

[Knowncitizen]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: knowncitizen
Date: 2019-12-02 15:34:12
Reaction Score: 0

They buried one on purpose! /s
This never made sense to me either.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: zxcv0
Date: 2019-12-03 01:45:40
Reaction Score: 0

Two options for mine:

1. It was at one point in time not buried.

2. It was erected for show; a fabrication on the level of dinosaur bones being unearthed and dug up.