"Tartaria" is a myth and didn't exist

Like the first time you searched for “Building 7” - searching for Tartaria can lead people down some wonderful research rabbit holes, and also traps.

The memeification of Tartaria into the beast it is today - one of hyper advanced tech and a completely peaceful society with no war - is a pipe dream at best and a psyop at worst.

Tartaria has some interesting research associated with it - namely their connection to native America and their past. Research suggests that their “invasion” of the west coast of America coincides with the disappearance of the mound builder culture. It is also possible that while the mainstream calls Tartaria a loosely associated region of tribal communities - that they did indeed have major cities, kings, and more permanent culture than suggested by Wikipedia.

Is there any research to point to their technological advancement? No more so than our intuition that the old world in general possessed technology unknown or being rediscovered today. But this is not a unique feature to Tartaria, it is part of a larger tapestry of lost or hidden history.

Many structures in Russia have indications that they were affected by the mud flood (speaking generally, as we don’t know what the “mudflood” truly is), but that doesn’t really have anything to do with Tartaria, per se.

AFAIK there were no worlds fairs in the regions formerly known as tartaria, so that’s out too.

One concept around Tartaria that hasn’t been discussed much since KorbenDallas’ original tartary thread is the theory that Napoleons march to Moscow is somehow connected to the dissolving of the tartarian empire. I think there may be some aspects of this worth looking into, as this also coincides with American conflicts pushing farther and farther west into what may have been Tartar territory (or at the very least, the descendants of tartary).

At this point I can say with some level of confidence that Tartaria as a meme has been pushed on alternative communities as a way to muddy the waters. These are classic disinfo tactics - raise a topic, provide interesting and verifiable information, then seed in disinfo in order to spin the wheels of potentially researchers.


That post was based off an excerpt from a series of articles I made a larger post on here

Dragons and Vampires in Scythia: Lessons from a Strange Book

Well posted and written. I agree. The problem we have with History in general is a lack of real evidence to cling to and work around. So much has been written by the Victors, the liars, the Jesuits that we have only like 20% of the jigsaw pieces and we are desperate to find at least another 50% so hence the stupid memes and vast oversimplification and some down right stupid views on social media.
 
I think that people should stop searching for „the most advanced, the best warriors”… living calmly without wars in peace with nature isn’t “primitive” or “cave man” thing. It’s probably the right way…
But with searching for the best you are just trying to say that Tatars don’t exist.
well they do. I am of Tatar descend but was rised in Poland so I don’t know anything about (and found all of it while searching for actual Tatars…). I just know that some of Tatars were writing and documenting their history. We had diary too, but my grandma gave it away. But maybe some families still have them.
while searching about name itself in different languages actually Tatar can be translated as “shaman”. If this is correct? Who knows, but can be a hint.
There are many Tatars all around the world (especially around the places where “Tartaria” was) and they are called differently depending on the place they live.
Tatars exist. But if they’re that big, awesome empire? That’s another question.
But again if you have erased history and erased culture there is a chance that it was erased and you can’t find anything or you can find what somebody want you to. What can make absolutely no sense or be falsified.
 
Well posted and written. I agree. The problem we have with History in general is a lack of real evidence to cling to and work around. So much has been written by the Victors, the liars, the Jesuits that we have only like 20% of the jigsaw pieces and we are desperate to find at least another 50% so hence the stupid memes and vast oversimplification and some down right stupid views on social media.


Yeah, our position is very challenging, we basically:


- have to undo the indoctrination that we've been subjected to for something like 2 decades at least

- get aware of our most fundamental (and often automatic) assumptions and their basis

- need to acknowledge that we simply don't know much at all and started from close to nothing

- have to sift through mountains of potential material

- have to work with small pieces of a puzzles that we'll likely never have many, let alone all pieces for

- have to still constantly question each of these pieces as many of them are altered (e.g. the vanilla skies - and someone has to first notice this pattern) or completely made up specifically to lead us astray

- And the findings are quite frankly utterly bizarre (worldwide mudflood?, buildings apparently build for giants?, scrap mining on a planeary scale?, wtf is all this!?)

- We also have to look for things that are not there (which is much more challenging than noticing patterns of things that are there), like the missing plumbing or the usually missing construction photographs that actually show a build process

- And we have to be very critical and skeptical of anything we see to notice subtle things that don't add up (like allegedly newly constructed buildings already looking weathered, etc.)

- Finally we have to combine all of this mess somehow to have an idea what actually happened in this world



But on the other hand, we have many great minds sharing their thoughts and ideas and working together to untie this giant knot. We don't know much but what we find tends to be pretty reliable, and through the process we get very accustomed to think far outside the box and have very healthy doses of skepticism.

So here we are :)
 
Returning to the subject, there is this very good article by a French recentist (Cartes tartares). I'm reporting here the translation with the Google translator:

Tartar Maps
Examination of a set of maps of the world and Tartary proposed by Silva Ivanova

Earliest dates and authors are most often assigned without evidence on the map. Some are possibly backdated or falsely attributed.

America

Jean Le Clerc's map of 1602 informs us that Nova Albion was founded in 1590 on the west coast.

Immagine 2022-07-05 231500.png
1602 Le Clerc, detail
One of the most debatable points of Fomenko's work is the idea that the conquest of the Americas from Europe took place two centuries later, the conquest of the 16th century being a conquest from Tartary. This requires that all of the cards that testify to this colonization – which he uses when it suits him – are false.

The names mentioned here on the west coast in 1602 are mostly Spanish - as on the east coast - but there is mention of Nova Albion, which the map says was established in 1590. This is as early or even older than the first English settlements on the coast east (Roanoke), which are not mentioned on this map.

Immagine 2022-07-05 231626.png
1608 Pet Kaerio, excerpt.
The insert at the bottom mentions native "Tartars". The presence of Tartars in the west will prevent colonization from the west. The Tartars even make them leave, since the north of the west coast is no longer mentioned on the maps from 1657, California being reduced to an island. The colonies reappeared under the same name in 1744, when the Russian Empire was formed in the east. The maps are correctly drawn from 1779.

Immagine 2022-07-05 231745.png
1657 Visscher, excerpt

The west coast is further detailed.

Immagine 2022-07-05 231954.png
1658, Visscher, excerpt
Nova Albion is still placed on the map with Port “Saint” Francis Drake, but it is confused with California, much further south, and now an island.

Immagine 2022-07-05 232113.png
1744 The Red, excerpt
The conquest of Siberia by the Russian Empire created “subjects of Russia” from the Arctic Circle. A joint trip by Tchirikow and De L'Isle allowed us to redo a better map of western North America.

Russia

Novogardia Russia (Hartman Schedel, 1493), Asian Sarmatia (Gregor Reisch, 1503), then Russia or Muscovy has been distinct from Tartary since 1500.

Persia is mentioned as such since 1493. In 1630 (Henry Hondio) it extends to Pakistan.

The Turks are the inhabitants of Parthia (Schedel, 1493), then Turkestan , which will later correspond to independent Tartary, to the republics of Central Asia. This nation includes Samarkand and Khwarezm (Samaria). This nation is different from modern Turkey, still called Natolia.

Modern Turkey is built on what we call “Ottoman Empire” but which is called “ Empire of the Turks ”, which more or less corresponds to the ancient Assyrians. It was only called the "Turkish Empire" when it entered Europe, which was only mentioned on maps in 1648 . This nation supplanted the Anatolian Greeks for about a century. A Little Tartary is mentioned north of the Black Sea that year.

Immagine 2022-07-05 232231.png
1562 Jenkinson
The map calls Samoyeds the inhabitants of northern Siberia. Tartars are still reported in southern Russia (Crimea, Astrakhan). The Tartaria associates the Horde Nagaia (main Horde) with the "Turkmen" and the country of Shamarghan.

Immagine 2022-07-05 232344.png
1562 Jenkinson, detail
“Samarkand, metropolis of all Tartary, is now in ruins. For Tamerlane has taken Bajazet the Emperor of the Turks prisoner. The inhabitants are Mohammedans."

Immagine 2022-07-05 232503.png
1572 Ortelius, excerpt
Central Asia is named Turkestan, associated with Corasssan. The capital is Samarkand. Tartary has among its towns Cambalich on the Ob. It still extends to the Volga. Cambalich is mentioned on maps as an important city or capital of Tartary between 1572 (Ortelius) and 1676 (Duval), but it is often not mentioned after 1657.

Tartary from the Nagaya Horde will now be separate from Turkestan.


Immagine 2022-07-05 232609.png
1587 Rumold Mercator
Russia has pushed Tartary beyond the Ob.

Immagine 2022-07-05 232712.png
1594 Plancio, excerpt
The extension of Russia is confirmed.

Hindustan designates around 1600 India with Indochina.

Immagine 2022-07-05 232813.png
1630 Henryk Hondius, excerpt
The Empire of the Turks extends in Egypt and on the Libyan coasts. Persia extends to the Indus. Indostan to the west or “Intra-Gangem India” is on the other side.

Immagine 2022-07-05 232908.png
1658 Visscher, excerpt
Mention is made of the Mogul on the Indus, between Persia and Indostan. Indostan is already named Mogul on the Jenkinson map of 1562, but the name had disappeared from maps. The Mughal Empire is said to have been founded by Tamerlane, but there is no mention of an Empire yet.

Immagine 2022-07-05 233006.png
1660 De Wit, excerpt
Russia extends to the Ob. Cumbalich and Caracorum are mentioned. Mogolestan is forgotten. Indostan is more or less limited to Indiam intragangem (between the Indus and the Ganges). The name does not include the peninsula where the regions Cambaia in the north and Narfinga in the south are named.

Immagine 2022-07-05 233117.png
1670 De Wit, excerpt
Indostan is separated from Persia by the Indus, and does not include the peninsula. Russia goes to the Ob.

Immagine 2022-07-05 233217.png
1676 Duval, excerpt
The empire of the Turks took over Europe east of the Adriatic. Muscovy retreats to the Volga. Cambalich is always mentioned with Caracoran. Hindustan is replaced by the Mogul Empire with Delhi and Agra as main cities. The Himalayas are called Caucasus.

Immagine 2022-07-05 233321.png
1680 Danckerts, excerpt
Mogul expanded north and south

Immagine 2022-07-05 233422.png
1684 Rossi, excerpt
Tibet is mentioned north of the state of Mogul.

Immagine 2022-07-05 233524.png
1690 Jaillot, excerpt
Muscovy goes to the Ob. Tibet is an integral part of Great Tartary and north of the Himalayas. On the map, the Himalayas is always the Caucasus.

The Mogul Empire crossed the Indus to the west and conquered part of Persia.

Immagine 2022-07-05 233623.png
1694 Jaillot extracted
The Himalayas are still called Caucasus. The map mentions Magias in Thibbet. The capital of Great Tartary appears to be Caracoram west of Altai.

Immagine 2022-07-05 233734.png
1696 Cassini, excerpt
Things change. Great Tartary now extends beyond the Volga and into Georgia. It was at this time that Peter I began the Russo-Ottoman war. In a recentist context, it is often said that the Russians usurped the legitimate Tartar power in Moscow, and that they put down at the time the “revolt” of Stepan Razin and the true believers from the Astrakhan region. Astrakhan will indeed be a Tartar military region thereafter. But we see that this attack is not the desperate rebellion of the last legitimate kings. It is an invasion of Russia by Great Tartary. The capital seems to have been transferred to Selinga on the Yenisei.

A recentist question is who were the Ottomans that Peter I was fighting. The Empire of the Turks is very in the south, it is necessary to pass by Georgia which the chart of Jaillot presents like independent. It's even harder now that Great Tartary has created a kingdom in Astrakhan.

Immagine 2022-07-05 233831.png
1700 Zurmer, excerpt
The Tartars took Tobolsk and Astrakhan. The Caucasus is placed in the right place. There is a "major Tibet" far to the north. Mugalia dates back far to the north. New cities appear like Cosaccorum in the Urals, or Urbs Mugalum (probably Selinga).

Immagine 2022-07-05 233928.png
1702 Godson, excerpt
The Kingdom of Astrakhan still exists, but Great Tartary is divided into three. “Mosovite” (sic) Tartary, independent Tartary which corresponds to ancient Turkestan, and Chinese Tartary, north of a border wall with China which corresponds to the Great Wall. The names of the cities change.

Immagine 2022-07-05 234023.png
1714 Iron, excerpt
De Fer's map of 1714 reconstructs Great Tartary, but it is imprecise.

Immagine 2022-07-05 234121.png
1720 Delisle, excerpt
The three Tartaries are again distinct. The capital of Muscovite Tartary appears to be Tobolsk. The name "Great Tartary" is now associated with independent Tartary.

Immagine 2022-07-05 234221.png
1744 Bowen, excerpt
Muscovite Tartary is now integrated into a "Russian Empire". There are only two Tartaries left, one from the west and one from the east.

Immagine 2022-07-05 234319.png
1748 Bellin, excerpt
A kingdom of Astrakhan is again reported south of the Volga. This is where Pugachev's revolt against Russia started.

Immagine 2022-07-05 234416.png
1755 Nolin, excerpt
The capitals of Independent Tartary and Chinese Tartary seem to be Bokara and Karakoto.

Immagine 2022-07-05 234508.png
1755 anonymous, excerpt
The name "Turkestan" is again used to designate independent Tartary. The words Turk and Tartar have become synonymous.

The status of Muscovite Tartary is fluctuating, so that maps from 1771 (often shown) mention Great Tartary again. But the Russians settled in Siberia as early as the 1740s. In 1775, due to the defeat of Pougachev, the north of Tartary seemed lost.


Immagine 2022-07-05 234604.png
1775 Letter, excerpt
The Tartars of the west are now divided between Uzbeks and Tartars Eiluts, in northern Tibet.

Immagine 2022-07-05 234654.png
1775 Lotter, excerpt
The Kingdom of Tibet has taken on a certain importance in northern India. He apparently annexed the Eilut Tartars.

Immagine 2022-07-05 234745.png
1786 Fadden, excerpt
South India is now called the Decan. Tibet is still distinct from China.


Immagine 2022-07-05 234841.png
1816 Darton, excerpt
The Eilut Tartars of independent Tartary are now attached to Chinese Tartary are the name of Mongolia.

Immagine 2022-07-05 234935.png
1824 Fadden, excerpt. Hindustan migrates south to the peninsula. The Deccan is not mentioned, so the name must refer to the whole of India.
Traditional China, to the southwest of present-day China (Shanghai) remains on the sidelines of most political recompositions.

A "Chinese empire" now includes Tibet, China, Chinese Tartary and Mongolia. In 1851, the original Chinese Tartary will be renamed Manchuria.

Western Tartary (Uzbeks, Kalmouks) becomes “Tataria” (future republics of Central Asia). Afghanistan becomes independent from Persia as the Kingdom of Cabul.

Immagine 2022-07-05 235038.png
1851 Tallis, excerpt
China, Tibet, Mongolia and Manchuria are the four quarters of the Chinese Empire.

To summarize, and in connection with the work of Fomenko

America


The presence of Westerners in America does not date from the 18th century. The conquest of the Americas dates back to the second half of the 16th century. Most names on both coasts in 1600 are Spanish. On the other hand, the Tartars were present when they arrived

Hidden fact: both coasts were colonized by Europeans around 1600, but the Tartars prevented conquest from the west. They will be defeated in the Indian Wars.

In 1744, the Russian Empire was formed in the east and crossed the Strait of Anian. The Russians of the western United States probably predate the conquest of the west as Fomenko supposes, but they are not Tartars.

Asia

Persia
has been mentioned as such since 1493. In 1630 it extended to the Indus, facing the Mogul Empire . From 1636 the maps distinguish Hyrcania and Alexandria as main cities. Belatedly Herat seems to have been called "Esterabad". His standard historically represents a lion.

The oldest maps of Ptolemy mention for Poland-Lithuania the name of European Sarmatia, and Muscovy is named Asian Sarmatia, before renaming the country Poland and Muscovy or Russia. The Turanians therefore ruled in Muscovy before 1500 as the Sarmatians . The manifest Turanian identity of Muscovites partially validates Fomenko's identification of Russians with Tartars. However, he thinks that the account of the end of the "Tartar yoke" by Ivan III in 1480 after the death of Mehmet II is a fable and that Russia remained a Tartar country.

Gold maps after 1500 show a Russia distinct from Tartary . Obviously Europeans have conquered Muscovy. Compared to Moscow, which would be the original Jerusalem, the history of the Hasmoneans shows that after the initial revolt of Judah Maccabee, the king who follows, Jonathan (Ivan?) is under Seleucid influence.

Fomenko also identifies the Turks and the Tartars, and sees in them generic terms not designating peoples. But Tartary and Turkestan are different countries from the 16th century.

The Empire of the Turks in the 16th century refers to Turkestan. In the 17th century it designates a country which includes Assyria, Natolia (modern Turkey) and part of Arabia. This nation supplanted the Greeks of Anatolia since about 1540. Around 1630 this empire extended to Egypt and the Libyan coasts, and Europe to the Adriatic from 1648 .

The wars against the empire of the southern Turks and against the Tartars are different. The “Turks” attacked Europe in 1648, the Tartars attacked Russia in 1694. Peter I did not face the southern “Turks” but the Tartars, the real “ Ottomans

The metropolis of Tartary is before 1550 Samarkand in Turkestan, whose inhabitants are said to be "Mahometans".

Tamerlan, Emperor of Tartary, from the Nagaya Horde, ravages Samarkand and takes the Emperor of the Turks Bajazet prisoner. The Nagayas become the dominant force. Their capital is at Cambalich (at least 1572-1676), and their territory extends to the Volga

Between 1585 and 1670, Russia pushed Tartary beyond the Ob on the maps. After Cambalich, the capital seems to have been Caracoram west of Altai and further from the front.

Around 1675, Tartary returned to the banks of the Volga, but was pushed back to the Ob again in 1690. The southern "empire of the Turks" attacked Europe

The attacks of the “Ottomans” against Russia seem to have been concomitant with the extension of the Mogul Empire to the north of India. Officially founded by Tamerlane, it may have been conquered in the wake of the capture of Turkestan. Although not part of Tartary, dynastic links may have been present. Called Hindustan, it again became the “Mogul Empire” from 1675. It then conquered the Indian peninsula and extended north of the Himalayas. In 1684, the northern Himalayas took the name of Tibet, whose kingdom was ruled by “Magias” (the “Caucasian Mages” were therefore the Himalayan lamas at the time). On the maps it is not integrated into the Mogul Empire but into Great Tartary. It crosses the Indus and takes Aghanistan from the Persian Empire.

The Russo-Ottoman War is directed not against the southern Turks, but Tartary. The Tartar attack in 1696 in the west takes Tobolsk and Astrakhan. It takes place at the same time that the name of Mugalia appears on the map in northern Tibet, with a new city named Urbs Mugalum, future Selinga , which will soon appear as the capital of Great Tartary. It therefore seems that the Mughal Empire was allied with the Tibetans, and with Great Tartary .

In 1702 military failure divided Tartary into three. Turkestan took the name "Independent Tartary" or from the west, again "Turkestan", even "Great Tartary" (1720 Delisle), with a capital at Bokara and perhaps a religious center again at Samarkand. The north invested by Russia takes the name of Muscovite Tartary, Russian Tartary, then Russian Empire (1744), with a capital in Tobolsk (which is therefore not the capital of Great Tartary as Fomenko says). Eastern Tartary is also called Chinese Tartary, whose capital would have been Karakoto.

From 1720, Tibet is reduced to a small country in the Himalayas. But a country called "Greater Tibet" is reported on some maps, and Moguls and later Eiluts on others east of Tartary, in what will later be Xinjiang rather than Mongolia, which is further north. in Chinese Tartary.

The western Tartars are divided between Uzbeks and Kalmouks in the west, and Eiluts or Mongols in Xinjiang. This explains why Great Vehicle Buddhism is shared in Mongolia and Tibet. The name Mogul appears to have been passed down from the Mogul Empire of Hindustan.

Between 1748 and 1775, the time of the famous “Pugachev revolt”, it seems according to certain maps that independent Tartary (Uzbeks and Eiluts) received the support of Tibet. The Tartars will take back the south (kingdom of Astrakhan) and the east of the Volga. The status of the north will fluctuate but it will remain generally held by Russia.

The defeat may have come from internal divisions. As early as 1760, Turkestan had two distinct regions, one for the “Uzbeks” and one for the Eilut Tartars. In 1816, the Eiluts were integrated into Chinese Tartary under the name of Mongolia and separated from "Great Tibet".

In 1824, the western area of Turkestan was renamed Tataria (future future republics of Central Asia). Mongolia, Chinese Tartary, Tibet and China proper form the four parts of the “Empire of China”. Chinese Tartary is then renamed Manchuria.

Thus it is indeed the Tartars who create an Empire of China (as Fomenko says), but the Chinese Tartars.
 
When looking at the youtube comment section it once was very common for people to express some variation of:

"Tartaria was once a dominant Empire and we have lost everything after evil took over."

I don't think there can be any doubt that we are enslaved by evil entities, however I'm not sure it's reasonable to assume that the old world was free of slavery or evil in general - just because they had advanced technology and capabilities at their hands.

If we assume that many of the statues are original old world, we can evidently see how they casually enslaved animals like horses (which needs a complete disrespect of the freedom of that conscious other being), and proudly made symbolic statues out of the scene, so it isn't much of a stretch to assume they did the same with other mammals, like humans. This might sound strange to some in a world like this where it is so normalized and common, but how can there be an actual civilized society that disrespects and rejects the freedom of sentient creatures that can't fight back?

So the assumption the world once was overall good and evil took over seems implausible to me.
An evil high-tech Uncivilization is even far far more dangerous, because of the multiple ways they can utterly enslave and harm you (do you remember these drawings of strange creatures with dog-, cat- or falcon-heads?), because they have all the capabilities that primitive have, and then many more that technology makes possible.
 
I don't think there can be any doubt that we are enslaved by evil entities, however I'm not sure it's reasonable to assume that the old world was free of slavery or evil in general - just because they had advanced technology and capabilities at their hands.
Well it's quite obvious to me that there was evil in the old world, otherwise we wouldn't be in our current total slavery. I see it as the good and evil paradox, just my speculation here but perhaps segments of the old world became greedy and power hungry.

This theme is explored by the popular Dj Alan Walker, many of his videoclips are about the destruction of the old world by their evil counterparts and persecution of the survivors, who were trying to explore and rebuilt their society. It's worth a look
 
Well it's quite obvious to me that there was evil in the old world, otherwise we wouldn't be in our current total slavery. I see it as the good and evil paradox, just my speculation here but perhaps segments of the old world became greedy and power hungry.

This theme is explored by the popular Dj Alan Walker, many of his videoclips are about the destruction of the old world by their evil counterparts and persecution of the survivors, who were trying to explore and rebuilt their society. It's worth a look

If everything is vibration then would there not be a positive and a negative? You can not have good without bad. They balance out.
 
So we're still in agreement that there was an old world with cool atmospheric energy, the gorgeous buildings that we all know about spread over more or less the entire known world and there probably was a significant civilization called, or otherwise known to us now as Tartar-something, yeah?
Because it doesn't really matter to most people what you call things, I think, just that there WAS an old world and many civilizations that harnessed advanced, seemingly "clean/green" technology (including and not limited to geopolymer) that has been erased from our collective memory to enable us to be shackled into an evil Brutalist loosh farm of a reality.

And that's what drew me to this place and the Old World anyways. The beauty, the achievements, the videogame like splendor and fantastical way of how we once were and what we were able to achieve as "humans".

I think people just call the entire old world "Tartaria" because it's how the universal style of architecture was introduced to them. A style that hinted a large, if not world spanning civilization, definitely a common THEME the civilizations and confederations of the past shared: technology, beauty, and splendor. Similar enough that we can clearly see with our own eyes they share enough things in common for us to make the deductions we have.

And I can see how that can distract from the goal of finding out true history. But the title of this thread itself is kind of misleading, in that "gotcha/clickbait/what I mean isn't actually what the title may instinctively convey at first" kinda way. Maybe worth renaming it so it doesn't evoke the same type of feel that the people who say "nooo, this place was just an unknown territory and you guys are nuts, there wasn't an old world that wasn't primitive garbage, Google says it was!"


Anyways, where are now as far as the consensus on the actual chronology that we've discovered so far? I haven't had time to really go through everything lately ever since the documentaries were put out. Gotta give them a peek.
When looking at the youtube comment section it once was very common for people to express some variation of:

"Tartaria was once a dominant Empire and we have lost everything after evil took over."

I don't think there can be any doubt that we are enslaved by evil entities, however I'm not sure it's reasonable to assume that the old world was free of slavery or evil in general - just because they had advanced technology and capabilities at their hands.

If we assume that many of the statues are original old world, we can evidently see how they casually enslaved animals like horses (which needs a complete disrespect of the freedom of that conscious other being), and proudly made symbolic statues out of the scene, so it isn't much of a stretch to assume they did the same with other mammals, like humans. This might sound strange to some in a world like this where it is so normalized and common, but how can there be an actual civilized society that disrespects and rejects the freedom of sentient creatures that can't fight back?

So the assumption the world once was overall good and evil took over seems implausible to me.
An evil high-tech Uncivilization is even far far more dangerous, because of the multiple ways they can utterly enslave and harm you (do you remember these drawings of strange creatures with dog-, cat- or falcon-heads?), because they have all the capabilities that primitive have, and then many more that technology makes possible.
You know I think about those weird creatures a lot and wonder is rather than genetic splicing or weird technology those were just things that somehow existed, because of the state of the biosphere at the time. And now they mostly don't because of the state it's in now (which seems to be at a low point in supporting life compared to the past).

It also seems like, if that was technologically induced, despite attempts to hide it we probably would have seen overspill of it by now in the form of way more of these kinds of cryptids being spotted or escaping from labs, but it seems to me the controllers are, if anything, trying to recreate things from the past in a different, probably more monopolized and more easily controlled way. We are not too technologically downgraded from the past in terms of capability, as much as that the technology we have now is just seemingly WAY more destructive and cancerous to life in general. There was probably a reason old buildings were more or less faraday cages or had properties similar to them.

But yeah, to my point of view it seems like the nature of the previous world was more "magical" than strictly technological, and there was probably always a coexistence and interdependence of both, and these days the controllers are trying to play catch-up to not just the technology of the past but the way things probably just were. I'm not convinced so far that the weird creatures in old art were churned out in weird genetic splicing factories like some have proposed but were probably a more direct manifestation of the dreamlike properties of the dream we're all seemingly trapped in right now. Because I don't really believe in physical reality.

This place is just a shitty astral realm with heavy restrictions. And it seems they've gotten heavier over time.

Perhaps this is why they introduced "digital technology" - to compensate for the lack of "magic" in the world now that may explain the lack of the fantastical creatures and so on that were seemingly normal a few hundred years ago. And when you look into the nature of digital technology, the ties to Goetia and so on.... it doesn't seem so far fetched that there's a lot of compensation going on, to aide those in power in enslaving us "more efficiently". The lack of magic these days, I'm sure, heavily restricts them too, which is probably why digital technology came to be. And probably even to an extent, the old "cleaner" technology of the past was compensating for the lack of astral/magical power we have to cope with now, but we can all see that this current vein of technology benefits one side much more heavily than the other.
It's nonetheless very telling to me that the old world seemed to know of and perceive EMF as a threat since they incorporation protection from it into their structures (from what I understand, anyways) and said technology can't even exist without causing death, cancer, and deterioration to all life it interacts with, period.
My gut tells me it's a choice that was made to monopolize power to compensate for a lack of power that all of us as humans now have to cope with, including them.

picsrel

(It's not lost on me how the "grids without people" found all over Earth resemble circuit boards either..................... Maybe even that technology was just another vein of this weird sigil magic we seem to use and take for granted now. I don't know. Suppose that completely depends on if they are in fact trapped, and evil! Who knows anymore? I've seen it proposed that demons are somehow not actually bad because of the roots of the word daemon. Everything is garbled and inverted, the generative principle of this realm seems to be paradox. Nothing can exist without containing everything in itself and its own opposite. The more I have looked into technology the more I've become convinced it's all bad.)

Oh, and yeah, I'm sure slavery existed even back then. I hate the fact that we can't even exist without eating living things in some form or another, you make a good point with the treatment of horses. I hate this place.
 

Attachments

  • 1651030321528.jpg
    1651030321528.jpg
    303.1 KB · Views: 226
  • 1651030068554.jpg
    1651030068554.jpg
    79.8 KB · Views: 242
  • damons.JPG
    damons.JPG
    60.9 KB · Views: 224
Last edited:
View attachment 18703
Tartary, a vast country in the northern parts of Asia... This is called Great Tarary (1771, Encyclopedia Britannica)

As we got many new users during the last months, some from Youtube, I think it's time to start a thread on this topic.

Many people in the alternative history community believe there was a unified civilization until recently, and that it was called "Tartaria". The idea of calling this civilization "Tartaria" is mostly being spread on Reddit and Youtube, and is being promoted by Youtubers who earn money with creating an almost religious following.

Read this to get an overview of previous research on Tartaria: SH Archive - Tartary - an Empire hidden in history. It was bigger than Russia once...

I think everyone who uses the term Tartaria to describe the Old World continues to cement a misleading view of alternative history.

While Tartary itself was real, it was not what many people now think it was. I do think there once was a unified civilization, with a unified architecture. But "Tartary" is a wrong name for it.

The myth came about when Russians started to realize that before their country was called Russia, it was named "Tartaria" on old maps. And it didn't only span Russia, but most of Asia.

Tartaria was split into different parts - Russian (Muscovite) Tartary, Chinese Tartary, etc.

Later some people found evidence that there were remains of Tartaria in America, mostly Western America, too. So the idea spread that Tartaria was literally everywhere.

And this is where things started to move into the wrong direction. In reality, Tartaria was simply a geographic area in Asia, with some of those Tartarians also influencing the American culture.

There is nothing more to it. It was part of the "Old World", but it wasn't exclusively the Old World.

So using the term Tartaria everytime one speaks about this old world cements a misleading view of a Slavic-centric world, where for some reason Russian culture dominated everything else.

To this date, not a single proof has been presented why this geographically limited region in Asia called "Tartary" was worldwide.

It is now simply a meme, and in my view it is a dangerous meme, because it limits our possibilities of what the Old World really was.

View attachment 18704
Country Flag of Tartary, independent of China, indeed suggesting a political structure. Another map here.​

Yes, Tartary was somehow forgotten after the communist revolution. Yes, Tartary was probably not a geographical area but a kingdom of sorts, with a flag and political unity. Yes, it was probably powerful at one point. Yes, Tartarian influence extended probably to America. No, it was not a worldwide advanced civilization that somehow dominated all of the other kingdoms we see on old maps.

A quick glance on the oldest maps of Tartary show that not the entire world was Tartary, surprinsigly.

South of Tartary you see Arabia, Persia, India, China and Japan. To the West is Europe.

If anything, Tartary should be understood as a symbol for forgotten knowledge - that's why we have the Tartary Griffin in our logo.

I will use this thread to collect more information on this, with the goal to publish an extensive article on this topic, wich can be provided as a reference whenever the topic of Tartary comes up.

Many scientists from Western Europe considered the Great Tartary a huge empire stretching from the Urals to the Pacific Ocean. For example, the Italian diplomat and Jesuit Giovanni Botero in his work “Universal Relation” (Relationi universali), dated 1595, wrote that this country used to be called Scythia. And it occupies half of Asia, in the west bordering on the Volga region, and in the south – with China and India. At the same time, the lands of a huge empire on one side are washed by the waters of the Caspian Sea, and on the other by the Bering Sea.​
Another representative of the Jesuit order – the French Orientalist Jean-Baptiste Duhalde – in 1735 published a scientific work entitled “Geographical, historical, chronological, political and physical description of the Chinese Empire and Chinese Tartary.” In his opinion, in the west this huge country borders with Muscovy, in the south – with Mongolia and China, from the north this state is washed by the Arctic Sea, and the East Sea separates Tartarius from Japan.​

Where was the Great Tartary? | Earth Chronicles News


The pseudohistorical conspiracy theory about Great Tartaria first appeared in Russia, popularized by Nikolai Levashov, and in Anatoly Fomenko’s New chronology. In Russian pseudoscience, known for its nationalism, Tartaria is presented as the "real" name for Russia, which was maliciously "ignored" in the West (for example, the 2011 film "Great Tartary - Empire of the Rus", posted on YouTube). Since about 2016, conspiracy theories about the supposed lost empire of "Tartaria" have gained some steam on the English-speaking part of the Internet.​
The conspiracy is based mostly on a misunderstanding of architectural history. Adherents suppose that demolished buildings such as the Singer Building, or the temporary grounds of the 1915's World's Fair were actually the buildings of a vast empire based in Tartary that has been suppressed from history. Sumptuously styled Gilded Age buildings are often held out as really having been built by the supposed Tartaria. The conspiracy is very light on details, and only vaguely describes how such a supposedly advanced civilization which had reputedly achieved world peace could have fallen and been hidden. The idea that a "mud flood" wiped out much of the world and thus old buildings is common, supported only by the fact that some buildings have basements which had windows. World War I & II are cited as a way in which Tartaria was destroyed and hidden, reflecting the reality that the extensive bombing campaigns of World War II did destroy many historic buildings. The general evidence for the theory is that there are similar styles of building around the world, such as capital buildings with domes, or star forts. However, such designs exist globally due to colonialism by empires such as Britain, Spain, and Portugal, not some lost empire such as Tartaria. The theory reflects a cultural discontent with modernism, and a supposition that traditional styles are inherently good and modern styles are bad.​

Tartary - Wikipedia
All the research I have looked into heavily leans towards the "Tartars" being the the united people's of the previously conquered lands of the Khan's. After ruling so much territory for so long it's stands to reason they would of incrementally been attacked and worn down from all sides over the years. It doesn't only serve the ideals of our western dictators to write them out of history but also empowers the controllers of the near and middle east to elevate their civilizations and historical claims. It also seems there has been a concerted effort by some to mix the Khan's empire with the mudflood and old world architecture especially with US and Australia. The moorish architecture all over America in particular is never accounted for and largely ignored by the community, of which I think offers more clues and opportunities for tangible research. I thank you all for your input and contributions into these subjects, your combined thoughts and conclusions are very much appreciated.
 
Like the first time you searched for “Building 7” - searching for Tartaria can lead people down some wonderful research rabbit holes, and also traps.

The memeification of Tartaria into the beast it is today - one of hyper advanced tech and a completely peaceful society with no war - is a pipe dream at best and a psyop at worst.

Tartaria has some interesting research associated with it - namely their connection to native America and their past. Research suggests that their “invasion” of the west coast of America coincides with the disappearance of the mound builder culture. It is also possible that while the mainstream calls Tartaria a loosely associated region of tribal communities - that they did indeed have major cities, kings, and more permanent culture than suggested by Wikipedia.

Is there any research to point to their technological advancement? No more so than our intuition that the old world in general possessed technology unknown or being rediscovered today. But this is not a unique feature to Tartaria, it is part of a larger tapestry of lost or hidden history.

Many structures in Russia have indications that they were affected by the mud flood (speaking generally, as we don’t know what the “mudflood” truly is), but that doesn’t really have anything to do with Tartaria, per se.

AFAIK there were no worlds fairs in the regions formerly known as tartaria, so that’s out too.

One concept around Tartaria that hasn’t been discussed much since KorbenDallas’ original tartary thread is the theory that Napoleons march to Moscow is somehow connected to the dissolving of the tartarian empire. I think there may be some aspects of this worth looking into, as this also coincides with American conflicts pushing farther and farther west into what may have been Tartar territory (or at the very least, the descendants of tartary).

At this point I can say with some level of confidence that Tartaria as a meme has been pushed on alternative communities as a way to muddy the waters. These are classic disinfo tactics - raise a topic, provide interesting and verifiable information, then seed in disinfo in order to spin the wheels of potentially researchers.


That post was based off an excerpt from a series of articles I made a larger post on here

Dragons and Vampires in Scythia: Lessons from a Strange Book
As for Russian war with Napoleon in 1812, there are enticing evidences that Alexander and Napoleon were on one side. But, as we know the war in Russia is treated as the patriotic war against invasion of France at present, with war heroes (Kutuzov, Bagration, Davudov snd many others). With epic battle of Borodino. My point is. I can understand the reasons why Russia rewrote history on its side. I wonder why French did the same and took Russia’s side . It was not that long ago afterall. Why it was beneficial for France to rewrite the history on theirs side and assume the invador”s role that lost at the end of the day according to official history? So everyone was covering up for Tartaria’s involvement in the conflict? Why everyone? Why China does the same? Could it be because the huge slavic dominance across the world in the past makes current countries (Russia, China, Europe) look insignificant and retarded? Well, in simplistic view, yes. Russian (based in Saint-Petersburg) czars were all blood-related to european monarchs up till Bolshevik revolution. So the whole European elite was united pretty much and shared same values, languages and ways of thinking. This is evolutioned in todays world, as we know it.
But somehow I feel that everything was more complex with Tartaria. It does seem like it came from completely different previous world. The better, or worse. The world that was destroyed completely by smth or smbd. As you probably know there are NO trees in Siberia older than 200 years. There are numerous ideal round-shape lakes and holes across the region. There is still radiation in some of it. That explains why there are no antique type buildings in Siberia. Almost all population was wiped out during 19th century when Russia became to re-“discover” new lands to the East of Siberia with completely new towns built at that time.
Too many things happened in the 2nd half of 17th century and then again smth happened in the 1st half of the19th.
 
I guess that Tartaria is only a name for “stolen history”? Something as a sign that there is something that was lost, so there can be more to our story?
I don’t really think that Tatars (or Tartars) were Slavic or anything. Looking at people bones and probably brain structure there can be more significant differences than “race” ones. Maybe someone developed “races” as we know them now. That’s not that hard to do and don’t take long.
Questioning is good, but when you question something, you need to question every single piece of information. if you believe in some because they just make sense to you, you can miss a lot.
russian or whatever, countries come and go, they change locations, they divide, disappear and appear. There were many countries made after 1st world word and now many people are “patriots” to these countries but….. what the hell were this people before? Why are we divided so much?
btw it’s interesting that Tartaria thing become such a big thing now after Russia took many things from Crimea (which was land of Tatars and you can find all maps calling that lands Tartaria too.) What is interesting lately it is known that Tatars were native population to Crimea which I don’t remember when I was searching about Crimean Tatars before.
I really believe that searching for something which was erased intentionally is kind of difficult and misleading because erased mean erased. Gone. Hidden. Not available.
We can share what we found but arguing that one is wrong because it doesn’t fit your (personal) narrative is kind of stupid.
I think that we all want to know truth, but searching for that can mean that what you thought of “good guys” were “bad guys”.
There is also no white and black in the world. There is no “perfect”.
I just wanted to share what if there were more than 1 times when history were erased? What if that all changed more than one time and it all became as a languages in babel all messed up? How can we know that 1500s data are ok, but then something happend in 1800 and only then is wrong?
 
Guys, read the Travela of Marco Polo. Tartary is just what they used to call the Mongolian Empire before the modern day times. Marco Polo named "Chinggis Khan" as the head of the Tartarian Empire in the book. Also in Russia, they call Tartary "the Golden Horde" and say Chinggis Khan was its leader.
 
View attachment 18703
Tartary, a vast country in the northern parts of Asia... This is called Great Tarary (1771, Encyclopedia Britannica)

As we got many new users during the last months, some from Youtube, I think it's time to start a thread on this topic.

Many people in the alternative history community believe there was a unified civilization until recently, and that it was called "Tartaria". The idea of calling this civilization "Tartaria" is mostly being spread on Reddit and Youtube, and is being promoted by Youtubers who earn money with creating an almost religious following.

Read this to get an overview of previous research on Tartaria: SH Archive - Tartary - an Empire hidden in history. It was bigger than Russia once...

I think everyone who uses the term Tartaria to describe the Old World continues to cement a misleading view of alternative history.

While Tartary itself was real, it was not what many people now think it was. I do think there once was a unified civilization, with a unified architecture. But "Tartary" is a wrong name for it.

The myth came about when Russians started to realize that before their country was called Russia, it was named "Tartaria" on old maps. And it didn't only span Russia, but most of Asia.

Tartaria was split into different parts - Russian (Muscovite) Tartary, Chinese Tartary, etc.

Later some people found evidence that there were remains of Tartaria in America, mostly Western America, too. So the idea spread that Tartaria was literally everywhere.

And this is where things started to move into the wrong direction. In reality, Tartaria was simply a geographic area in Asia, with some of those Tartarians also influencing the American culture.

There is nothing more to it. It was part of the "Old World", but it wasn't exclusively the Old World.

So using the term Tartaria everytime one speaks about this old world cements a misleading view of a Slavic-centric world, where for some reason Russian culture dominated everything else.

To this date, not a single proof has been presented why this geographically limited region in Asia called "Tartary" was worldwide.

It is now simply a meme, and in my view it is a dangerous meme, because it limits our possibilities of what the Old World really was.

View attachment 18704
Country Flag of Tartary, independent of China, indeed suggesting a political structure. Another map here.​

Yes, Tartary was somehow forgotten after the communist revolution. Yes, Tartary was probably not a geographical area but a kingdom of sorts, with a flag and political unity. Yes, it was probably powerful at one point. Yes, Tartarian influence extended probably to America. No, it was not a worldwide advanced civilization that somehow dominated all of the other kingdoms we see on old maps.

A quick glance on the oldest maps of Tartary show that not the entire world was Tartary, surprinsigly.

South of Tartary you see Arabia, Persia, India, China and Japan. To the West is Europe.

If anything, Tartary should be understood as a symbol for forgotten knowledge - that's why we have the Tartary Griffin in our logo.

I will use this thread to collect more information on this, with the goal to publish an extensive article on this topic, wich can be provided as a reference whenever the topic of Tartary comes up.

Many scientists from Western Europe considered the Great Tartary a huge empire stretching from the Urals to the Pacific Ocean. For example, the Italian diplomat and Jesuit Giovanni Botero in his work “Universal Relation” (Relationi universali), dated 1595, wrote that this country used to be called Scythia. And it occupies half of Asia, in the west bordering on the Volga region, and in the south – with China and India. At the same time, the lands of a huge empire on one side are washed by the waters of the Caspian Sea, and on the other by the Bering Sea.​
Another representative of the Jesuit order – the French Orientalist Jean-Baptiste Duhalde – in 1735 published a scientific work entitled “Geographical, historical, chronological, political and physical description of the Chinese Empire and Chinese Tartary.” In his opinion, in the west this huge country borders with Muscovy, in the south – with Mongolia and China, from the north this state is washed by the Arctic Sea, and the East Sea separates Tartarius from Japan.​

Where was the Great Tartary? | Earth Chronicles News


The pseudohistorical conspiracy theory about Great Tartaria first appeared in Russia, popularized by Nikolai Levashov, and in Anatoly Fomenko’s New chronology. In Russian pseudoscience, known for its nationalism, Tartaria is presented as the "real" name for Russia, which was maliciously "ignored" in the West (for example, the 2011 film "Great Tartary - Empire of the Rus", posted on YouTube). Since about 2016, conspiracy theories about the supposed lost empire of "Tartaria" have gained some steam on the English-speaking part of the Internet.​
The conspiracy is based mostly on a misunderstanding of architectural history. Adherents suppose that demolished buildings such as the Singer Building, or the temporary grounds of the 1915's World's Fair were actually the buildings of a vast empire based in Tartary that has been suppressed from history. Sumptuously styled Gilded Age buildings are often held out as really having been built by the supposed Tartaria. The conspiracy is very light on details, and only vaguely describes how such a supposedly advanced civilization which had reputedly achieved world peace could have fallen and been hidden. The idea that a "mud flood" wiped out much of the world and thus old buildings is common, supported only by the fact that some buildings have basements which had windows. World War I & II are cited as a way in which Tartaria was destroyed and hidden, reflecting the reality that the extensive bombing campaigns of World War II did destroy many historic buildings. The general evidence for the theory is that there are similar styles of building around the world, such as capital buildings with domes, or star forts. However, such designs exist globally due to colonialism by empires such as Britain, Spain, and Portugal, not some lost empire such as Tartaria. The theory reflects a cultural discontent with modernism, and a supposition that traditional styles are inherently good and modern styles are bad.​

Tartary - Wikipedia
This is fascinating, and I love well-intentioned skeptical takes on this stuff. IMO there is a lot of bull-crap out there, posted in the name of Tartary. That said, I literally have a historical map of it on my wall; it did exist as a recognized political entity in the past. Second of all, be aware that this general awakening that you're tapping into here is not specific thing, tied to a specific theory or two. It's the hypothesis that history is not what we have been taught that it is. With humans in charge, this hypothesis is always going to be true to some extent; it's just the degree and the details that are up for debate! Cheers!
 
Tart+Arya = Sum+Arya = Arya (Ancient Persia) = Iran

Simply put I am an alleged member of this ridiculous conspiracy. Or at least maybe my ancestors were. Right, that's what this mythos is insinuating right? Well, I am a Professional Building Inspector, and Licensed Building Energy Consultant in California. My family history, and family tree is riddled with Conquerors, Chateaus, Assassins, knights, and Chevaliers. To be super specific there are a bout a dozen castles ion France named after my family, many of which still operate as Hotels, Vineyards, Food Factories, Casinos, Ruins, or even Government Buildings throughout France, Belgium, Switzerland, Luxemborg Netherlands and yes Menton but not Monaco.

So my point here is that my family did in fact build many of these building, and then actually came around later and modified them. My father was a realtor, his father was an Architect. My personal experience with construction, renovation, restoration and other building techniques and technologies is unquestionable.

There are some truths that underlie this scheme to a degree. The Irish and Scottish do claim to be Scythians. Tartaria did seem to be known as Scythia at some previous point.

Scythia = Saccari = Issacar = Issac Tribe
Denmark = Danemaerken = Danes = Dan Tribe
Danube River, Dniepro River, Don River

We Swedes know damn well that we are all Judeo-Scythians in Sweden: Swede = Suvi = Saka = Saccari

So there are way to many buildings that fit this mud flood archetype to be taken seriously. If you want to earn my approval in this quest for validation we have to start with the known knowns, and the known unknowns. We accept fairly openly that all modern societies simply stumbled into these ancient cities. Lately there are many being located underwater. These sites will not be publicised due to the extensive defacing other sites have experienced. In about 30-50 years we may have more information available to the general public. At this time however I can say with relative certainty that there was never any such thing as a genuine Tartarian Empire. These maps makers were mostly fraudsters, much like todays NFT peddlers. Some of the information is somewhat reliable, but much is also very shady at best.

So the heraldry of Tartaria is another issue. ancient Heralders would have had a plethora of princes and princesses pouring out of Tartaria with documentation and Pedigrees if they were in fact some sort of imperial power. Ancient Egypt and Feudal China both had Imperial standards and Family Crests, so this is nothing new to Europe or Eurasia. Now the Chinese do seem to document much surround the Cherchin, or Jaijin Invaders of the Taklaman and Gobi. These Indo-European Language nomads from Bactria spread monastic Buddhism to China. So we do know that the Chinese called the Early proto Mongolian people as Tartars. In fact the Great Wall of China was known internally as the Great Tartar Wall. SO there definitely were Tartars, and they even seem to be different from the "Indo-Aryans" (Iran) aka Proto-Indo-Europeans who "invaded" India around 2500 BC. The Secret History of the Mongols was written sometime around 1200 BC, and documents their conversions. The ethnic name of Tartar was supplanted by the dynastic tribal name of the Mongols. So the Tartars converted themselves into Mongols slowly over time.

So with all that said there is more to the story. Several Mud Flood Survivor candidates are named after my family. Fer real I myself cannot verify the construction of these building in the way I can verify others. The advent of red brick does have a known origin point, at least according to known sources. However I have found evidence That suggests a potentially earlier date? We know stone is very hard to date, but bricks have to fired. This leaves a distinct isotope signature in the brick which can be easily and accurately dated. So with that said we know the Romans loved red brick as well as concrete. We have evidence all over of Romans using (non) standard sized ancient bricks, and some (modern) standard sized bricks. Ancient China invented red bricks around 4400BC. So there is some credence to the idea that some sort of China base culture swept over the world for a very short period, rapidly constructing civic building and gymnasiums, apartments and Palacial office suites. Just look at how fast China moves today, building and then rapidly destroying entire massive cities.

People find brick foundation work all the time and just write it off as some old farmers cellar. However these uneducated farm dwellers seem not to understand that these bricks were never brought to this location in recorded history. So in this way much of the undocumented history has been accidentally or non deliberately erased by blundering peasants. I have found numerous brick columns, and strange constructs in the deep desert of Southern California. We have inexplicable mineshafts in certain copper rich areas which were never drilled. They look to be hand chiseled. Much of the official narrative is obviously wrong, simply because we have not yet filled in all the blanks, with Scientific Discoveries yet. Archaeology is a field which is beset on all sides by the dragons of plunder and wholesale destruction. War and economic changes have in fact thoroughly erased much of the cultural legacy of the past. However the past was shit, everyone was slaves to some piss-head, get over it. We live today on the shoulders of our ancestors. Maybe there is no way to prove or disprove any of it and that is the most intriguing aspect to it all.
 
Guys, read the Travela of Marco Polo. Tartary is just what they used to call the Mongolian Empire before the modern day times. Marco Polo named "Chinggis Khan" as the head of the Tartarian Empire in the book. Also in Russia, they call Tartary "the Golden Horde" and say Chinggis Khan was its leader.
True. Except for one thing. Chinggis Khan’s face does not have ANY asian trates according to some pictures and sculptures left - european face. Also greatest majority of Russian native slavic population has no trates of mongol gemones in the DNA…after 200 hundred years of Mongol-Tatar ruling according to official history.
 
"There is no more sovereign eloquence than the truth in indignation. It is more difficult for a people to keep than to gain their freedom. The Protests of Truth are always needed. Continually, the right must protest against the fact. There is, in fact, Eternity in the Right. The Mason should be the Priest and Soldier of that Right. If his country should be robbed of her liberties, he should still not despair. The protest of the Right against the Fact persists forever. The robbery of a people never becomes prescriptive. Reclamation of its rights is barred by no length of time. Warsaw can no more be Tartar than Venice can be Teutonic. A people may endure military usurpation, and subjugated States kneel to States and wear the yoke, while under the stress of necessity; but when the necessity disappears, if the people is fit to be free, the submerged country will float to the surface and reappear, and Tyranny be adjudged by History to have murdered its victims."

I noticed that Albert Pike made reference to Tartary, in "Morals and Dogma" pg. 15. New user, forgive me if this is not the place to share this. : >
 
True. Except for one thing. Chinggis Khan’s face does not have ANY asian trates according to some pictures and sculptures left - european face. Also greatest majority of Russian native slavic population has no trates of mongol gemones in the DNA…after 200 hundred years of Mongol-Tatar ruling according to official history.
1663929066164.png
1663929102370.png

1663929364151.png
mongolia-genghis-khan-with-his-wife-borte-ujin-dividing-his-empire-between-his-four-sons-mugha...jpg

1663929597451.png


I would like to see an older image of him as non-Asian... but I couldn't find any earlier than 20th century!
 
New info on Tartaria PUTIN declassified the TARTARIA archives. The official history is FALSE

PUTIN declassified the TARTARIA archives. The official history is FALSE

Geography, Hidden History, Lemuria (Mu)


PUTIN declassified the TARTARIA archives. The official history is FALSE
“At school we are taught that before the advent of Christianity we were all almost wild people. However, many facts contradict these fictions. For example, in the Encyclopedia Britannica of 1771, the land of our ancestors is described as the largest and most developed state called the Great Tartarus. There are many documents and maps that support this. Some of them are in the Russian Geographical Society. These and other artifacts, such as the Chandar plate, testify to us that the level of development of the civilization of our ancestors was incomparably higher than what we learn, as official history tries to convince us. This level is even higher than the current level of development of our civilization.”


From Encyclopedia Britannica, first edition, Volume 3, Edinburgh, 1771, p. 887:
“Tartaria, a huge country in the northern part of Asia, bordering Siberia in the north and west, called the Great Tartary. Tartars living south of Muscovy and Siberia are called Astrakhan, Cherkasy and Dagestan, living in the north-west of the Caspian Sea, called Kalmyk Tartar and which occupy the territory between Siberia and the Caspian Sea; Uzbek Tartar and Mongols, who live north of Persia and India, and finally Tibetan, living to the north-west from China. “


How did the Great Tartarus disappear from geographical maps in the 18th century? And why has the total falsification of world history become possible?
The Moscow Kremlin website reports in 2017:
Vladimir Putin met with the former President of Tatarstan, now the State Councilor of the Republic of Tatarstan, Mintimer Shaimiev, to present him with a gift – the map of Tartarus, made by the seventeenth-century Dutch cartographer Willem Blau. VIDEO
WHAT IS TARTAR?
What is the significance of Putin’s gift, observers wonder. The Dutch cartographer Willem Janszon Blau, whose work Putin presented as a gift to Shaimiev, was the greatest specialist in Tartarus.
On the gold-framed map presented to Shaimiev, the territory of northeastern Eurasia from the Volga and the Caspian Sea from the west to the eastern ocean belongs to Tartarus. At the same time, the countries of Siberia, Central Asia and the Far East are shown to be under the control of the great inn. This, in particular, is reported by the TASS agency. The map also shows the borders of Tartarus, the genealogy of the great Han temples of Chingiz, as well as Little Tartary (Crimea), Great or Asian Tartarus, Tartaria, Desert Tartarus, Chagataisky ulus, Turkestan, the Kingdom of China and Old Tartarus.
According to the Encyclopedia Britannica of 1771, Tartaria was a huge country. The encyclopedia offers the following definition of this gigantic state, plunged into the darkness of centuries: “Tartaria, a huge country in northern Asia, bordering Siberia in the north and west, called the Great Tartarus. The Tartars who live south of Moscow and Siberia are called Astrakhan, Cherkask and Dagestan, those who live in the northwestern Caspian Sea are called Kalmyk Tatars and occupy the territory between Siberia and the Caspian Sea; Uzbek Tatars and Mongols, who live north of Persia and India, and finally Tibetans, who live in northwest China. ”
Business Online asked its experts what such an unusual gift presented to Shaimiev could mean and what it means.
Damir Iskhakov – Chief Researcher of the Ethnological Monitoring Center of the Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan: There are many such maps showing Tartarus – Little Tartarus and the Great Tartarus. Until the eighteenth century, European cartographers used this term.
At school we are taught that before the advent of Christianity we were all almost wild people. However, many facts contradict these fictions. For example, in the Encyclopedia Britannica of 1771, the land of our ancestors is described as the largest and most developed state called the Great Tartarus. There are many documents and maps that support this. Some of them are in the Russian Geographical Society. These and other artifacts, such as the Chandar plate, testify to us that the level of development of the civilization of our ancestors was incomparably higher than what we learn, as official history tries to convince us. This level is even higher than the current level of development of our civilization.
Why did they hide the plates from Tărtăria?
Our past – the Great Tartarus
The past of the Aryan Slavs is the past of our earthly civilization. There is already a lot of truthful information! You just have to look for them and popularize them as much as possible among all the peoples who want to know the truth…
The movie “Great Tartary – Empire of the Russian” tells the true story.
The Great Tartarus was and remains the greatest power in the world, which the world’s elites are trying to break into small pieces – specific principalities that would be easier to conquer to destroy the population…
Putin declassified the Tartar archives
Original by: Posted by u/One-Ad6450


Notes on the Language of Tartaria:
Yes, and no.
To peel back this onion you need to “un-babble” the church’s counterintelligence and other assorted misdirection.
The tablets are not in Hungarian per-se, they’re in the language modern Hungarian is based on which is now being called “magyar”.
The name itself is somewhat tongue-in-cheek. This is not it’s real name, the name used by the people actually speaking the language, it’s the label that is used to obfuscate what it really is and to hide it in plain sight. But, we will use the term for now since it’s easy to Google.
The language base called Magyar is the linguistic origin of Sumerian, Etruscan, Dacian “first civilization” peoples as well as many others. Sounds ridiculous given the timeline we are all indoctrinated with, but it’s true:
LÁSZLÓ BOTOS
Magyar-Etruscan affiliations
“The presence of the Magyar language at such an extensive geographic spread going into ancient times is the proof of a once unified world-language of which the longest surviving remnant is the Magyar. “
Also, please don’t get hung up on the modern idea of Hungary, Romania, Poland, Ukraine, etc. – these are all blinds to hide the common ancestry of these peoples and languages, what we would modernly call the Sauromatian peoples of Scythia. These people have been mentioned before on the forums and are a key to understanding the war that’s been waging between the old and new factions. That’s a whole ‘nother can of worms.
Hungarian prehistory – Wikipedia
“Most extant chronicles show that the earliest works contained no information on the history of the Hungarians before their conversion to Christianity in the 11th century.[35] The only exception is the Gesta Hungarorum, which is the earliest extant Hungarian chronicle, whose principal subject is the Magyars’ pagan past.[37]”
The Gesta is one of the few surviving original texts of these peoples. Or at least that’s still accessible. Its a link back to the truth before the propaganda war began.
In any case, the Tartaria tablets actually mention and show the “Sumerian” god Enki (Aquarius), that’s what the little guy with the fish tail is standing next to the goat (Capricorn). Also note the little sprig of wheat between the two, which is the same as shown in the “Sumerian” seal on the right. Same language. Different parts of the world. Different artistic flare.
17022-f6f52a19ac9f648c9c6d5f6f42566770.jpg 17023-d984c7ed03d3937f12171c420d38e564.jpg 17024-ffef21638b2041a11e1ba256cc959954.jpg
There were several types of alphabet used on this base language depending on the part of the world you were in and the time period. Coelbren was one of the earliest and was used for trade throughout the British isles, Mediterranean, Turkey, and North America all the way through China. There was also more than one form of coelbren, one of which we now call ogham. These are not “Celtic”, there was no such thing as Celtic. Total myth created in the 1800s to fill a hole caused by hiding the other groups. A modern term and idea and part of the great misdirection.
In the above Alan Wilson link he mentions the “Cimmerians” using coelbren. Cimmerians are the same word as Sumerians. Pretty obvious if you just say them out loud.
All forms of Coelbren can be read omnidirectionally as can it’s cousin Cuneiform. They can both be translated with the same base language. Its useful as a trade language as everyone sitting around the table can read the same document at the same time without the need to pass the paper around or flip it.
Now, is this the later Tartarian language referenced earlier? Yes, kinda. Magyar is the base of that language, but they were using a different common alphabet later in the empire. Coelbren had long been replaced with the advent of printing. What you’re seeing is an evolution in a single language, not necessarily different languages.
Also, just a fun aside. The pretty “nordic pagan” tattoo symbols so in vogue these days are a multidirectional sigiled form of the coelbren/ogham on the right (book of Ballymote). Right in front of everyone’s faces, yet no one is literate enough to read them.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top