Continuing with no transition from the previous post...
If we assume (1) that the appearance of the Hunting Falcon/Ball Plasmoid was a regrettable but necessary consequence of creating temples to channel and “summon” the anomalous zone which fed the community both physically and metaphysically, and (2) that the Hunting Falcon would inevitably eat the livers of whomever it “saw”, wouldn’t it make sense to…chain someone to the central pillar to “distract” or “pacify” the Hunting Falcon when it rose from the Earth and stop it from wreaking indiscriminate havoc on the community? In other words, by picking a sacrificial victim, be it human or animal, was an even greater danger averted? (Wasn’t Prometheus chained to a rock where an eagle ate his liver every day?) And of course, wouldn’t it make sense, once the ball plasmoid phenomenon began to wane, for desperate people to increase the rhythm of sacrifice in an attempt to bring God back (not the plasmoid per se, but the zone of fertility itself), until the whole thing degenerated into a hideous bloody cargo cult? Isn’t this exactly what happened to the Mayas and the Aztecs? The Earth changed, the anomalous zones stopped appearing, fertility dropped, disease ravaged the community, crops failed, and morality degenerated. The rhythm of sacrifices increased, but it didn’t work, and the community ended up fleeing the formerly active anomalous zone and regressing to savagery in the jungle. The ball plasmoid, a consequence of the appearance of the anomalous zone, was mistakenly worshiped as its cause.
Mutatis mutandis, the sacrificial ritual, which also included dance, music, theater, etc., came to be seen as the cause that attracted the ball plasmoid that attracted the fertility, when the original reality was the exact contrary: the fertile anomalous zone generated the ball plasmoid which necessitated the sacrificial rituals…which is exactly what we observe in more recent cargo cults, a “magical” inversion of cause and effect.
Here we might also see the organic connection between the two faces of paganism, the “good” nature-honoring face and the “bad” sacrificial face. The two were organically linked and indivisible. To be sacrificed to the living God and thereby save the community was originally an honor reserved for royalty…perhaps the sacrificial victim somehow even merged with God…
This model solves another weird mystery: the origin of temple prostitution. It makes perfect sense for the Temple to be a site of sexual activity during the active Anomalous Zone periods (associated with certain seasonal celestial conjunctions), since it was at the center of the energetic phenomenon. I can imagine the scene: the shining, translucent, plasma Hunting Falcon is devouring an ecstatic sacrificial victim chained to the central stone phallus/pillar as congregants and hierophants, tripping balls on aetheric energy, seeing psychedelic visions of the timeless implicate order, swarm as close to the center as they can like insects to a flame to screw their brains out in a frenzy of raw life energy. I can imagine the victim choosing to die in order to merge with God, a great honor. I can imagine humans and animals copulating with each other, as well as animals with other animals, which will produce chimerical life forms nine months later. (These rituals would persist as Saturnalia and Bacchanalia, all the way up to today’s Carnival.)
In “Away in a Manger - Part Two”, Usselo shows a selection of bizarre stone “hogback tombs” from Britain decorated with scary carnivorous beasts like bears and reptiles, and then suggests that victims were chained there to be fed as sacrifices to really-existing carnivorous monsters.
Away In A Manger - Part Two | IHASFEMR
Hypothesis: after the disappearance of the anomalous zones and the plasmoid balls, the still-surviving giant chimerical monsters which had been born in the “old times” were seen as remnants/children of God and fed/worshiped in the same way that the plasmoid ball was once appeased, by chaining victims to a rock…
Doesn’t this explain all the weird Biblical injunctions against sodomy and bestiality, which at some point had degenerated into a sick cargo cult ritual? Doesn’t this explain why in pre-monotheistic religions chimeras were worshiped as the offspring of God? Doesn’t it explain why in India, the country whose religion today most resembles the ancient ball plasmoid religion, mutant humans and animals are worshiped as avatars to this day?
Mutant goat is 'worshipped as an avatar of god' in India
Eugene McCarthy would say that this mutant goat is the result of intercourse between a man and a female goat. The anomalous zones may be dead, but there is still enough aether energy trickling into our domain for things like this to occasionally happen. Indeed, without aether energy, life would no longer exist at all.
Notice the mutant two-headed cow, which was probably born as the result of anomalous energy fields caused by the passage of a comet. It would appear that comets somehow affect the energy field in a catastrophic way, creating negative anomalous zones, causing plagues and hideous mutations. To change themes a little bit, I wonder if the Comet Nigra and Black Death of the 1340’s has some connection with the Avignon Papacy, which Jef Demolder, following Kammeier, claims launched Christianity as well as the retroactive falsification of all history before then. Nodding to the original theme of this thread, from which I have seriously deviated here, it would seem to me at this point that temples and churches went from being ball plasmoid generators to indoctrination centers, butcheries, and radio stations. Will Scarlet and Felix Noille see the 10th century collapse as the crucial catastrophe that separates real history from forged history. Jef Demolder situates this event around the time of the Black Plague. Others situate it even closer in time to us. When did the ball plasmoid disappear? Did it disappear in different places and at different times?
In the following post, Sekito summarizes an argument by MM Postnikov that Vesuvius was worshiped as a god in the ancient world:
MM Postnikov - Critical study of the chronology of the ancient world (English - machine translated)
Now, it has been more or less proven here that Pompeii was buried in 1631, not 79 AD. One of the weird things about Pompeii is how sex-oriented it was, with phallus images, orgy mosaics, and brothels everywhere. Well, if we consider that volcanoes are incredible places of power whose eruptions are caused by violent streams of energy shooting from below ground, it would make sense that the elite of the time would flock to the feet of Vesuvius to fornicate. Again, I have no idea if the “magic” was still working in 1631 AD. I guess by then it had just become a simple cargo-cult sex tourism destination for degenerate aristocrats. Sekito quotes Postnikov as suggesting that the area around Vesuvius, meaning Naples, was the original holy city, and that honor was only usurped by Rome later. Naples is historically the most populous city in Italy, which is itself kind of a mystery, and one can still today see how incredibly rich it once must have been.
In
Hitler was a British Agent, Greg Hallett reports that Hitler’s father was conceived in an Illuminati ritual that involved three separate masked Rothschilds terrorizing and then finally raping Hitler’s grandmother on a special occult date (so their sperm would combine, I suppose), with the goal of luring a demonic entity into her womb, one that later could be remote-controlled as a golem. It sounds far-fetched, but the theory is logically consistent with what we have seen here so far…
This makes me wonder again about morality and its connection with the ancient gods. There is this idea present in many ancient religions that God punishes the immoral and rewards the moral. This remains opaque to me. Is there truly a universal Moral Law, as Kant believed, one linked with the stars themselves? Kant's precursor Spinoza makes the connection clear. His
Ethics is explicitly geometrical, and indeed written in the style of a mathematical proof: there is a geometry of growth and joy, which he calls conatus. This geometry mediates between God and man. When the implicate order becomes explicate, are those who have strayed too far from the geometrical moral order somehow punished? At the same time this feels wrong. There are predators and parasites on Earth today because the Law of Entropy under which we currently suffer demands it. It seems unusual to blame remoras and tapeworms for embracing a strategy that is dictated by the energetic profile of their environment. And anyone who has a little experience in life has probably witnessed a few examples of bad leading to good and vice versa. I would even go as far as to argue that in a basically godless world, in which almost all forms of direct psychic communication and connection are disabled, we humans have a rare and valuable opportunity to experience solitude, to learn individual rather than group lessons, to collect knowledge of a different sort, to savor difference, lack, separation, and failure on our circuitous path back to primordial unity, and perhaps even to explore deception and parasitism in the process. (The elaboration of such an ethics was the project of the brilliant postwar philosopher Gilles Deleuze.) And don’t all communities that desperately attempt today to maintain the old traditions and fantasies of unity, in the absence of the original psychic/morphic field that once sustained them, have a whiff of fascism, by which I mean, a kitsch/ersatz version of community whose invisible organizing principle is no longer an aether-mediated solidarity, but rather repression, neurosis, sadomasochism, mutual surveillance, boredom, sterile routine, alcoholism, domestic misery, etc.? If what Yyprst is suggesting is true, the whole point of community back in the day was the cyclical opportunity to get high on the anomalous zone together...
This foray into morality may seem like an unnecessary digression from the original topic of the thread, but I don’t think so. Temples and cathedrals are the most polysemic and complex artifacts that have come down to us from the old world. Morality clearly played a non-trivial role in whatever it was that these buildings “did”.
What makes this phenomenon pass on the characteristics of good tomatoes to bad tomatoes? As opposed to passing on the characteristics of bad tomatoes to good tomatoes?
Especially given that mould may appreciate a bad tomato more than a good tomato.
It seems to me there is another question of mechanism here as well as whose preference for the direction of 'goodness to badness' or 'badness to goodness' would take priority over the other.
Here, Usselo poses an important question: why would the scalar field “prefer” the tomato to the mold that would grow on it otherwise? This reminds me of a paradoxical Zen proverb which Suzuki comes back to again and again: the Zen practitioner loves weeds and flowers equally, but prefers flowers (I paraphrase). One of the more radical ideas Velikovsky advances in “Worlds in Collision” is that vermin such as locusts and fleas literally fell to the Earth from Venus after its close pass in the heavens. If I remember correctly, esoteric Judaism claims that animals only started “biting” each other after the Flood. I would like to offer another speculative hypothesis. What if the genetic “geometry” of parasites was instantly “downloaded” from the scalar field at the precise moment that the electromagnetic profile of Earth changed, perhaps due to a celestial upheaval? Perhaps this explains all the weird accounts out there of insects and frogs suddenly raining from the sky. Regarding the scalar field’s “preference” for tomatoes over mold, I have a possible explanation. Here it is worth giving a more precise definition of Spinoza’s conatus:
In the philosophy of Baruch Spinoza, conatus (/koʊˈneɪtəs/; wikt:conatus; Latin for "effort; endeavor; impulse, inclination, tendency; undertaking; striving") is an innate inclination of a thing to continue to exist and enhance itself. This "thing" may be mind, matter, or a combination of both, and is often associated with God's will in a pantheist view of nature. The conatus may refer to the instinctive "will to live" of living organisms or to various metaphysical theories of motion and inertia.
Conatus is intimately linked with a movement towards greater complexity. Take a library for example. There are two ways to extract energy from it. I can sit down, slowly read the books one by one, and apply the knowledge I find inside to the world around me to increase order. Or I can burn the books one by one to keep myself warm for a few nights. The first process is “conatic”, the second is entropic. This is what parasites do: they “burn libraries” by attacking and dismantling organisms more complex than themselves to extract simple heat. Hypothesis: as the aether strengthens and weakens, different genetic “blueprints”, each adapted to different ecosystems, and of which there must be an infinity, are downloaded from the morphic field into material reality. Sheldrake’s chreode theory offers an explanation on a nuts and bolts cybernetic level of how this might happen. When energy is added to the morphic/scalar field, as in Meyl’s experiments, perhaps the sudden excess is spontaneously channeled towards growth. Or to use an example from microeconomics, a person who makes a subsistence wage has no choice but to “burn” his monthly salary on food and rent, whereas a person who makes more than he spends can channel the surplus towards some “geometrical” enterprise that will in the long run function as a crystal resonator channeling money and energy upwards rather than downwards.
This makes me think of something else. Studies show that beautiful people, that is to say, people whose facial geometry is symmetrical and more closely approximates the Golden Ratio, are perceived as being more moral. Well, this makes sense. The fundamental principle of the universe is resonance. Structures resonate with geometrically similar structures. At the deepest level these structures are immaterial and located in the scalar/morphic field. If morality is also a property of this field, it would make sense that more geometrically perfect bodies and faces would function as better “conatus antennae”. There is one small problem, however. Look at Hollywood. Look at TikTok. Are beautiful people really more moral? I don’t think so. Once again, this contradiction vanishes if we postulate that the aetheric field that once allowed bodies to resonate with ideal forms no longer functions so well. Beautiful people would therefore be an empty artifact of a bygone Golden Era. One might even argue that since beautiful, symmetrical people are perceived as being more moral, they are precisely the people who today can most easily get away with parasitism and deceit. In other words, in an aetherically weak world in which symmetry no longer resonates with the Moral Morphic Field any more than asymmetry, beauty is the ideal camouflage for a predator. A classic example of the
coincidentia oppositorum of dialectical philosophy. And when the celestial wheel turns again, and energy levels rise, and the system begins to move away from entropy and towards waxing order, the parasitic forms will once again fade into the shadows, only to return when the wheel turns again. I suppose that this is the origin of the Kabbalistic/Masonic
Ordo ab Chao: the two eternal forces,
solve et coagula, that eternally succeed each other. Where the Masons and Kabbalists go wrong is in believing they can artificially control the process. (Or can they...?)
The history of classical music seems to confirm this. Let’s take five composers: Bach (1685-1750), Mozart (1756-1791), Beethoven (1770-1827), Wagner (1813-1883), and Schoenberg (1874-1951). With the exception of a six-year gap between Bach and Mozart, we have an unbroken chain. Hypothesis: these genius composers were all downloading forms and structures from the aether, and we can reconstruct the “shape” of the aetheric field over time by studying their music. (Perhaps we can even extend the analysis to philosophers with roughly the same timeline. Bach=Spinoza, Mozart=Kant, Beethoven=Hegel, Wagner=Nietzsche, Schoenberg=Heidegger.) In Bach’s music we have pure fractal geometry with very little individual subjectivity. When we listen to Bach we have the impression of leaving ego behind and experiencing the eternal structure of existence directly. With Mozart we lose some of the complexity of Bach, but we retain the “golden ratio” architecture. We also begin to see the stirrings of individual subjectivity, albeit somewhat politely. With Beethoven, the modern individual finally emerges in a recognizable form: we have rage, anxiety, joy, frustration, sadness, Eros. With Wagner we attain a peak of emotional lability. The classical principles of harmony and symmetry are pushed to their breaking point, and the form of subjectivity that emerges from his music is ecstatic, manic-depressive and nostalgic. It also offers us a glimpse of the disintegration to come. With Schoenberg, we find ourselves in a completely disorganized and deconstructed world, in which symmetry no longer functions, in which beauty and ugliness are morally equivalent. A lot of critics dismiss modern and “postmodern” music as hideous garbage, but I think they’re missing something. Yes, much of this music is ugly, but it reveals something deep and true about the nature of the world we live in today. We can’t go back to the old world, not until the aether allows it, in any case. Our bodies were conceived for a different world. This world is for rats and cockroaches.
THE ARK
Yyprst offers the following tantalizing speculation in one of his articles about the ball plasmoid:
It would appear that someone in Egypt figured out how to trap the plasmoid ball (and perhaps himself along with it) in a gold-covered box, keep it “alive” artificially by funneling atmospheric electrical energy as well as sacrificial bioenergy to it, and use it as a weapon and power source. Again I am speculating, but is it possible that Yahweh was the “last ball plasmoid standing”? In other posts I speculate that the Phoenicians conquered Egypt with usury and trade and ran it as a colony, illustrated by the Old Testament story of Joseph (the “first Epstein” according to Jim Duyer). The endpoint of the usury cycle is the moment when all hard assets are stripped from a conquered territory and expatriated. It happened recently in Greece when the country defaulted on its debts to the EU and had no choice but to allow foreign creditors to come in and take possession of all national infrastructure such as the energy grid, the ports, etc. Well, if we imagine that the Phoenicians ran the Egyptian economy into the ground in a similar way and then skedaddled with all the riches, wouldn’t it make sense that the single most precious asset to steal would be the highest fruit of Egyptian science, namely a god itself, trapped in a box? Once the Hebrews/Phoenicians had their stolen “God in a box”, they engaged in a ruthless campaign of eliminating all the surrounding altar “god generators”, large and small, that ensured the perennity and economic/spiritual viability of the many communities that had formed around naturally occurring anomalous zones over history. Once their god generators were lost, they became dependent on trade with the "first NWO" to survive. Energetically, centralization = parasitism, and the Beast System described in Revelation can be logically derived from close observation of the heavens. This would explain why sacrifice was only allowed at the Jerusalem Temple: Yahweh was physically located there and there alone, and he tolerated no other gods being fed. All this must have taken place before whatever celestial upheaval ended the Ball Plasmoid era. The Jersualem Temple has been described as a site of 24/7 industrial animal sacrifice. Yahweh must have been completely drunk on death energy, and very powerful. Did he become evil over time as his power grew? Did the Phoenicians, who embodied parasitism from the beginning, make him evil? Did different ball plasmoids have different personalities? Did they have any volition at all, or were their “personalities” always simple projections of the priest classes who had figured out, in Egypt, how to operate the tech? I imagine it like a bullfight. And maybe bullfighting even emerged as a re-enactment of the taming of the Hunting Falcon. Who knows what kind of destructive power the temple priests in Jerusalem wielded. Maybe they were able to conjure Death Star style energy discharges, using sacrificial bioenergy as a power source, that effectively were able to nuke rivals into oblivion over great distances. There are a lot of melted stone buildings out there…
When the electromagnetic profile of Earth changed, Yahweh stopped working along with all the other old gods, but the psychology and religion remained…if my hypothesis is correct, Yahweh was NOT the first god of the Phoenicians. They were always atheists, living outside of the anomalous zones, at war with the aether. If they “worshiped” anything, it was profit, commerce, and themselves. After all, wasn’t it their command of trade and usury that allowed them to steal and control the most powerful weapon on Earth, a god? Didn’t their mastery of money and the phonetic alphabet allow them to invade and subjugate Egypt, the most scientifically and technologically advanced nation in the world? What good was all that technology against usury and lies? They existed before Yahweh and they continued to exist after Yahweh. The priests controlled Yahweh from the beginning. Only the dumb, illiterate masses ever worshiped him…
By the way, if you want to make your own mini-plasmoid Yahweh in the microwave, and burn your house down as a bonus, check out the following videos:
View: https://youtu.be/CCkst55j9Go
View: https://youtu.be/lHLXVL8zpgM
The plasmoid ball, contained in glass, survives for as long as it is fed a constant stream of microwave energy. We are already halfway to an ark with these videos…
Usselo writes:
My understanding of the stationary patterns visible at 17s is that they are an optical illusion, an interference pattern caused by the flicker of my laptop's LCD display 'beating' with the rotational frequency of the yin-yan symbol at that moment.
Usselo once again points out something important here. The four-pillar swastika that emerges from the spinning yin-yang symbol is an optical illusion. However, if we are simply looking for an origin of the symbology, an optical illusion is enough. People represented what they saw. This would explain why the number of swirls or pillars is variable in the symbols. We have double swirl symbols (yin/yang), triple symbols (triskelion), quadruple symbols (swastika), going all the way up to twelve-spoke symbols like the Schwarze Sonne. You are also correct that the magnetic field producing the “four corners with central pillar” temple shape in the ferrofluid (sadly invisible in the video) appears to be a more stable phenomenon. Here I encounter the limits of my scientific knowledge and can only guess. My very basic understanding of magnetic fields is that they are spinning at very high speeds, and that if this speed is constant, it could theoretically form what look like stable pillars. In other words, the pillars are “sucked upwards” and maintained in place by an invisible aetheric vortex around them. I would be very curious to know if we could get three-point, etc. structures under different circumstances, or if the four-point mandala structure somehow reflects the shape the field “wants” to take.
IDOLS AND BLOOD
I promised we would come back to DNA and witchcraft. First I want to talk about blood. Usselo, in IHASFEMR you link to the Livejournal blog of someone named Selenadia
selenadia who suggests that ancient people used stone urns and sarcophagi to “brew” frothy (ionized) blood which was then consumed during religious rituals, leading to genetic “ghoulization” of the blood-drinkers. It is a very creepy theory and the blog is full of images of hollow statues and sarcophagi with drill holes that are still stained with whatever nasty biofluid leaked out. I remember reading this blog and being intrigued, but not completely convinced. I am starting to think there is more here than I originally suspected. It would seem like blood demonstrates all kinds of “magic” properties when it interacts with the (scalar?) energies of the anomalous zones. We are all familiar with the fairy-tale image of witches sitting around a cauldron in which the body parts of different animals as well as sperm, menstrual blood, etc. are mixed. Well, today if you do that, you just get a disgusting, stinking biosludge with no magical properties. But what happens if you do it in the anomalous zone? Remember, these magic spells only work during certain celestial alignments, which points us in that direction. Was this how genetic engineering was done in the ball plasmoid era? Was it that simple? I have a friend who recently hurt her eye. At the hospital they stuck a pig embryo, or something like that, on the injury. They literally just stuffed it under her eyelid and told her not to touch it for a week. All it took for the magic pig stem cells to interact with her own eye cells and heal her wound was being placed against the lesion. Did the scalar field somehow potentiate all of these ingredients and lead to the actual gestation of monstrous entities in these stone urns and sarcophagi? Basically artificial eggs? Is there a connection with all the stone baptistries that were built at one point, as Usselo points out somewhere? Selenadia shows that most of these ancient stone idols were hollow and probably filled with something. Is this how idols functioned? Were idols made of clay mixed with the charged/brewed/ionized/scalarized/whatever “frothy blood” of ancestors, kings, pharaohs? Were stone idols filled with this blood? Did these idols “come to life” when the anomalous zone was activated, allowing people to communicate with their dead ancestors and hear the voices of kings? This would give us a clue as to why the Hebrews were so hell-bent on destroying all idols in addition to all altars: they were still, at that point, inhabited with the “souls” of dead kings and ancestors, perhaps even gods. I can imagine the statues “waking up” in the presence of the recurring scalar field the way fluorescent bulbs light up when passed close to a wireless power source. Maybe this is also why the ancient Hebrews were prohibited from consuming blood: because they risked being possessed or genetically modified if they did so. That is why we have Halal and kosher butcheries: so the priest can make sure the blood is all drained out and the meat can be consumed with no danger of ghoulization or influence from a rival god. Maybe this is also where the prohibition on masturbation and the banishment of menstruating women to a quarantine tent comes from: to prevent witchcraft.
Praveen Mohan has a couple of astounding videos that argue convincingly that genetic engineering was practiced in Indian temples. The detail that really blew me away was the ancient practice of filling a sealed vial with blood squeezed out of the umbilical cord of the mother when a baby was born. The blood was mixed with some kind of “special powder” (...whose formula has been lost, at least to regular people) and the vial was sealed and tied around the baby’s waist with a cord, where he would leave it for the rest of his life, never taking it off under any circumstances. Later in life, when the person got hurt or sick, the vial was opened and the contents, now dry, were ingested. Some Hindus still do this, but I suspect nothing happens these days. As it turns out, umbilical blood is full of stem cells specific to the individual, and it would appear that the ancient Indians somehow knew this, and knew how to preserve the healing power of stem cells for future use.
View: https://youtu.be/thGz-4ve3eA
View: https://youtu.be/cH7C37W22V0
More to come.