The Battle of the Gods: Stolen History in Reports from inside the American Revolt

[AthroposRex]

She is certainly cardboard-- "an unspeakable automaton." @JWW427 Some people say she is a clone. My thought is that people on the whole, and all over the so-called advanced world, changed drastically around 2005 or so. They became, as I called them then, "phone people." I saw the change so clearly in my students. Now people like Psaki are in their 40s and in positions of power. I couldn't communicate with them when they were students. They were so obedient, self-absorbed, and detached from reality. They seemed like aliens then, and now they frankly frighten me as they seek to universalize their vacant normality.

Phone people. I like that.


I've been calling them "toasters".

Because a toaster generates heat through inefficiency. It's basically a bad robot.

 

[Jd755]

My thought is that people on the whole, and all over the so-called advanced world, changed drastically around 2005 or so. They became, as I called them then, "phone people." I saw the change so clearly in my students.

I suggest, nay tell people all the time to bin their phones and not a one has done so. From James T Kirk talking into fake communicators in the 1960's through to today 2021 where everyone, from as soon as they can walk , is on real communicators engaging with a fake world.
Now that is a reset if EVER there was one.

 

[SonofaBor]

Deplorable McAllister hits on "Hollywood Babylon" as portrayed in the 1916 film Intolerance. The film, she argues, puts in plain sight the reality of Hollywood-qua-Babylon. The only remaining piece of the set is an archway/portal. The portal stands centrally situated in Hollywood (near the Chinese theater at Hollywood and Highland shopping center and above a vast underground network). That the portal is now covered in black indicates to her that "Hollywood has fallen."

On another note, Noam Chomsky has publicly advocated that people who refuse the vaccine should be quarantined and left to their own devices (i.e., without food supplies). He is, thus, arguing for genocide, since 50% or so of Americans have refused. This moment has been called an Armageddon, for the veil covering truth is falling.

Chomsky was an important figure 35 years ago for me; he relayed the historical truth about U.S.-sponsored genocidal atrocities around the world. Learning about atrocities in Central America in the 1980s was particularly significant to me. His method was simple: he'd read the papers for official discourse and compare this with fact-- what any honest journalist should do. He became a champion of the anti-war left.

The knife of irony slices the veil. He is utterly contemptible, a quietly seductive, poisonous urchin of the establishment.

 

[David Glenney]

Wow, what a piece of feces. Gatekeeping and covering for 9/11 was bad enough. I think they overpaid for his soul.

 

[SonofaBor]

Yeah. I could add a list of crimes he has committed over the years. These three are pretty bad:

1. Never talking about Eisenhower's detainment and murder of German soldiers post-war.

2. His idiotic emphasis on language as being innate and not in any way determinative of thought and action (Thus, his dismissal of Foucault and the French post-structuralists, who were onto something).

3. His refusal-- so common amongst academics-- to ever discuss who might really be the powers that be.

Now he reveals himself to be a total hypocrite. It is disappointing for me, to be sure. But over the past two years I've had "friendship ending" conversations with a number of academics, who champion the cause of the underdog, so long as the underdog is cute and fuzzy (such as, Southeast Asians struggling for free speech and power under totalitarian rule). But middle America-- no matter they share the same predicament as the fuzzy people-- are all dismissed as dangerous fascists who must be contained and controlled. No doubt, this has been the attitude all along.

I can't find the words to adequately condemn these people.

 

[Collapseinrealtime]

To be honest, I was never much impressed by Chomsky. I tried to read "Hegemony or Survival" back in the early 2000's, but found that though a critically acclaimed linguist and activist, he was quite a terrible writer. He also failed to identify the real causes and people behind the problems he vaguely addressed, again in spite of this reputation as world renown linguist and social justice "warrior". He seems to have done far more damage in demonizing real activists, branding them as domestic terrorists, xenophobes, and supremacists, never calling out the Cabal and their hidden handed involvement. And what a downer in general he tends to be in interviews, never smiling, always blaming somebody for doing something terrible while never advocating for taking personal responsibility for one's own thoughts and actions.

It is actually refreshing to see him finally revealing his true colors for all to see, since it seems that prior to his latest toxic statements, he held such huge esteem and sway, in spite of his overall mediocre contributions. This now puts far greater pressure on other popular "heroes", since the Covid scam has really raised the bar. Perceived heroes like Trump and other populist leaning politicians realize they now have to be very careful as they navigate between keeping their financial backers happy (Pfizer, J&J, etc) while maintaining their voter base, a true tightrope balancing act, to say the least. The whole world is watching...

 

[SonofaBor]

R.I.P., Rob Skiba, May 26, 1969- October 13, 2021.

Like Robert David Steele, he appears to have suffered asphyxiation while in the hospital.

A Christian scholar, he made a tremendous contribution to the study of Giants/Titans/Mythological Gods. He has also compelled countless evangelicals to read outside their 66 books to consider, for example, The Book of Enoch and other works, long suppressed for their vivid historical accounts of how things came to be.

He also has had a remarkable influence on the study of Stolen History.

Video: Archon Invasion: The Rise, Fall and Return of the Nephilim

Book: Archon Invasion, The Origin Of The Nephilim​

 

[SonofaBor]

In this interview, Juan O Savin talks about the following:

1. The fact that we've all been infected by the spike protein; but, technology is available to cure us.

2. The hidden history of power struggles in the U.S-- going back to Eisenhower, MacArthur, Truman, Kennedy and Nixon.

3. The reality of Tesla technology, and the importance but difficulties of its implementation.

4. The PTB pattern of destroying entire populations in order to set up new orders-- his specific example, China.

5. The necessity for people to refrain from chaotic open combat, i.e., civil war, which is being prompted.

Then, he gets sidetracked by anxious questions.

I continue to find him credible. I wish I could interview him.

 

[SonofaBor]

The Holographic Truth About 2021​

Jason Breshears says yes, but their targets remain too low to stop the automatic reset of May, 2040.

I recommend his historical studies and have elsewhere. @Safranek introduced him to SH, here.

In my humble opinion, his old-school erudition is not given the attention it deserves.

 

[Collapseinrealtime]

It would seem to me that the controllers behind this pysop have the ultimate goal of waking up the sheeple--on both sides of the political spectrum.

On the left, the psyop keeps pushing harder and harder for further restrictions, even on their base that have otherwise completely complied with all of the mandates. Rather than reward them for their compliance with more "freedoms and privileges", instead it's: Got your first jab? Good job, now get the second! Got the second shot? Good job, now get the booster! Got the booster too? Good job, now put your mask back on and make sure to social distance! How many more restrictions will they need to comply with before they finally recognize that they are under attack and then say "Enough!"?

On the right, we've got a ton of Q Anoners on Bitchute and other video platforms touting how great Trump's first term was and how great it will be once the election fraud is finally exposed, because then we will get to see what a real American President will do to "drain the swamp". They also frequently make unprovable claims that many of the "Dark Hat" deep state players are already beginning to rot in Guantanamo Bay, being replaced by clones, run by the "White Hats," who are intentionally making these characters look so ridiculous as they blatantly demonstrate a callous and smug attitude towards the populace at large, with the ultimate goal of waking up the people while running the agenda in fast forward to show what would have happened had the "White Hats" not stepped in.

Then we've got the more conservative branch of Trump supporters that are beginning to grow weary of defending Trump's reputation, yet still holding strong and waiting to see what Trump will do next while tuning into the War Room on Newsmax. Will he run again in 2024? How can he win if they don't fix the election system first to ensure fraudulent free contests?

But it seems that the controllers intend on taking it even further, exposing Trump as well for the fraud he really is. Never before have I seen such a desperate group of supporters try to defend their hero, who has not done anything even remotely heroic to deserve the admiration he gets from his base.

Since his base, both from the Q Anon collective and from his mainstream Fox News/Newsmax viewer support enclave fail to see through the age old left/right paradigm, instead blaming all of the corruption on the Democrats and RINOs (Republican in name only), it seems the controllers are cranking things up yet another notch by having Trump overtly getting behind Pfizer and friends, bringing this bad theater production to a grand climax. Think of the disappointment, frustration, and anger his supporters will begin to feel after all of this time of defending his every shady and nonsensical move, only for their hero to flip on them and rebuke them for not supporting HIS vaccine rollout, going so far as to state that it was because of HIS efforts that the vax program has been such a "success", making it a point to say to the booers that they are a very small faction and that tens of millions of people have had their lives saved as a result of taking the vaccine.

What is the ultimate strategy here? The only logical motive that ties this all together is that the puppet masters' ultimate goal is to wake up as many as possible, both on the left and right. Exposure of the left/right paradigm would allow them to harness the energy of both sides to support a third option that they already have lined up and ready to go. This will be in concert with a grand disclosure tsunami that seems to have already begun, and they will soon turn the spigot on full blast in the upcoming weeks and months. Stay tuned...


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XMQ8uEwQ77AT/


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ms2o8jtY16I4/

 

[SonofaBor]

We'll see. A lot of people everywhere have had enough. In some ways it doesn't matter. If we the people lose, it is game over.

A friend of William Cooper and Art Bell (who I still don't forgive for trashing "the Morgile" with the help of a creepy professor towards which Bell genuflected like a insecure freshman), Juan O Savin doesn't talk history as much as mythologies (e.g., Exodus and the story of the American Revolution), lately. Not that I don't like these mythologies. Only that people like us can see through them and want to see through them. One key element that I'm beginning to believe, based on Juan O Savin and Miles Mathis (on the Salem witch trials), is that the Puritans probably were pure-- insofar as they sought communal life and separation from the beast of the PTB. If all of us, no matter where we are, have something of the Puritan in us, then all of us have been subject to all kinds of torture, hi-jinks, and experimentation. We are the enemy, the freaks, the outcasts. Out here where I live nowadays, there are still "colonies" of Puritans. They are good agricultural business people, but they suffer lack of meaningful interactions with the rest of us. But I don't blame them. Our society is so sick and in danger that their trepidation and insularity may serve to preserve their lives after we are gone. Or maybe not. Even the Blackfeet got starved and surrounded and then preyed upon and re-educated. Now their governors issue covid mandates.

Well, we're all Blacks and Native Americans nowadays-- that is, enemies, freaks and outcasts. Maybe Trump is just the "Ghost Dance" of the so-called American people, as suggested-- more or less--above. Maybe this oppression stops. I see reasons for optimism still. Interestingly, in any case, pessimism seems useless.

Most people are neither purely pure nor completely corrupt. People play along to get along. Maybe this is a strength, maybe not. But there ain't much play left for a lot of people. Either they fight or they go down like slaves with Stockholm Syndrome.

 

[Collapseinrealtime]

I'm still seeing a bigger picture at play here. I had been wondering how Trump's character would ultimately play out in this really bad theater production. The Q Anon players seem to be more damage control than anything else, keeping alive the left/right paradigm while conceding to certain obvious truths within the "truther" movement that predated Q, yet still perpetuating many fictions long embraced by the mainstream narrative, particularly the one identifying JFK as some rogue player against the Cabal. They also never question whether or not his "assassination" was a real event, only going as far as pointing out a likely Israeli espionage connection.

The fact that Juan O Savin or Simon Parkes or Charlie Ward have never scored an interview with Trump is telling in itself. Just the event of Trump agreeing and participating in an interview with any of the Q Anon players would instantly bridge a serious gap between the Q Trump supporters and the mainstream Trump supporters that have never viewed a single Q Anon interview or post. Instead he's only granting interviews to smug schmucks like Bill Oreilly who has always only ever been a complete gatekeeper of the mainstream narrative. It seems that this is quite deliberate in order to perpetuate division between these two disparate groups that would have otherwise long ago come to some semblance of a united front. If such a united front were bridged, Trump would be forced to address the real perpetrators of 9/11, an audit of the Fed, and so many more conspiracies that are still carefully gate kept within the mainstream conservative media platforms that the Q Anoners are at least somewhat addressing. It would also put a serious death blow to the trigger response of "that's nothing more than a conspiracy theory" every time new light is shed on the shenanigans of the Cabal. It would also finally put an end to the left/right paradigm deception, forcing Trump to either side with the people for real or reveal his true colors as just another "company man".

What I find most interesting is that Trump is actually being quite deliberate in showing himself as a company man, at least to those supporting him that are also refusing the jab and suffering the consequences for it. The argument that I'm hearing from the Q Anoners is that Trump is deliberately doing this to wake up his base, which actually does carry some merit.

The controllers are obviously quite patient to let this play out for as long as necessary, allowing for as much tyranny as it takes to compel more and more awakening and then pushback, since the designated hero for truth is actually quite a terrible actor and pathological liar who has not done so much as lift a finger or in any way given a real voice to his otherwise cognitively dissonant but ever loyal supporters. The more bullish he becomes in pushing the vax while smugly insisting on taking the credit for its "success", the more likely a greater and greater chunk of his base will begin to sour and then dwindle, either becoming disheartened and indifferent or perhaps finally waking up and unplugging, which seems to be the ultimate goal of the controllers, who dictate Trump's every move. So I guess the pressure will begin to build on people like Juan O Savin to disavow Trump, otherwise his credibility will begin to be seriously scrutinized as well. His connections to Military Intelligence should already be enough to raise numerous red flags, especially if he chooses to keep supporting Trump as some clandestine populist parading around as the polar opposite of true populism. The fact that his staunchest supporters do not yet see this is just baffling!

 

[Safranek]

Even the Blackfeet got starved and surrounded and then preyed upon and re-educated. Now their governors issue covid mandates.

Sadly, this further illustrates that their leaders are also owned. From the website you linked;

"Despite loosened COVID-19 restrictions by the state of Montana, the Blackfeet Nation is still exercising caution. Please see the Blackfeet COVID Phase Plan to learn more about the Tribe’s current response."

I see reasons for optimism still. Interestingly, in any case, pessimism seems useless.

True, but with optimism one should not stray from staying grounded in reality.

People play along to get along. Maybe this is a strength, maybe not.

Playing along with corruption is only a strength when its a part of a strategy to achieve a desired outcome of freedom. Without such a plan its a weakness.

If such a united front were bridged, Trump would be forced to address the real perpetrators of 9/11, an audit of the Fed, and so many more conspiracies that are still carefully gate kept within the mainstream conservative media platforms

It would also finally put an end to the left/right paradigm deception, forcing Trump to either side with the people for real or reveal his true colors as just another "company man".

since the designated hero for truth is actually quite a terrible actor and pathological liar who has not done so much as lift a finger or in any way given a real voice to his otherwise cognitively dissonant but ever loyal supporters.

the more likely a greater and greater chunk of his base will begin to sour and then dwindle, either becoming disheartened and indifferent or perhaps finally waking up and unplugging, which seems to be the ultimate goal of the controllers, who dictate Trump's every move.

In a nutshell.

For the followers, a Cinderella story gone wrong, for the PTB a staged necessary prelude to the desired civil war - American against American - where attention has been shifted elsewhere and their opposition is significantly weakened and reduced. They want to create as many factions based on race, religion and political beliefs as possible to minimize the chance of a Unified American Constitutional Republic minus the PTB of times past and present.

 

[SonofaBor]

The fact that Juan O Savin or Simon Parkes or Charlie Ward have never scored an interview with Trump

I don't think this is accurate. 107 meets regularly with Trump. Steele called him Trump's "personal emissary."

So I guess the pressure will begin to build on people like Juan O Savin to disavow Trump, otherwise his credibility will begin to be seriously scrutinized as well. His connections to Military Intelligence should already be enough to raise numerous red flags, especially if he chooses to keep supporting Trump as some clandestine populist parading around as the polar opposite of true populism. The fact that his staunchest supporters do not yet see this is just baffling!

Yeah, it is baffling. Nobody believes Trump really favors the jab. He affirmed and affirms everyone's free choice.

The only thing I see dimly is tied up with The Law of War, 11.3.

I think I mentioned it earlier in this thread. 107 talked about it again today. Certain sequences must play out, otherwise the occupation cannot be ended-- or so the argument goes. 107 also explains in this interview what Trump is doing regarding the jab.

Playing along with corruption is only a strength when its a part of a strategy to achieve a desired outcome of freedom. Without such a plan its a weakness.

Most are individually weak in the sense you describe. But as a herd? It seems on one side, the battle is to turn the herd against the Cabal; on the other, it is to systematically and progressively cull it. I've never understood herded people. I simply know they are imprisoned, usually by their choices.

Can the herded become free? My answer is yes; but, here you could reasonably assert that I'm not

staying grounded in reality.

 

[Deleted member 1432]

Personally, I have come to the conclusion that Trump's role in the entire affair has been to destroy hope - to leave people hopeless and therefore much easier to control and manipulate. He was the carrot to the donkey of the people (and not just Americans,) except he lead them straight over the edge of a precipice with no hope of climbing back up.

He played his part very well.

 

[Collapseinrealtime]

I don't think this is accurate. 107 meets regularly with Trump. Steele called him Trump's "personal emissary."

What I meant is regarding an interview or interviews to be conducted with Trump that would actually be aired for the public to view. If mainstream Trump supporters heard of an interview with Juan O Savin, for instance, they would look for it and watch it, suddenly being exposed to a whole other world of information. They would then likely look into JOS's other posts and be exposed to other information he has put out there, potentially changing their entire world view. So far as I know, no videos have been posted of 107's correspondence with Trump.

I agree with Safranek that by Trump not doing public interviews with Q Anoners, it serves to keep the two groups of his supporters divided and the information marginalized. It also keeps the supporters scratching their heads, wondering what to think about Trump's true motives and loyalties. This kind of uncertainty can't go on indefinitely, as his supporters, regardless of how cognitively dissonant they currently are, will inevitably grow weary of Trump's many inconsistencies, either falling away in hopelessness and despair or being activated in a whole new way and finally calling him out. This is the scenario I think they are intentionally bringing to a boil. The players of this theater seem to be acting out in such a way so as to polarize both the left and the right against the entire establishment, since neither side of the populace seem to be getting any closer to what they really want: the population of the left want things to "go back to normal", so they go along to get along, while the population of the right want the political left to be held accountable for their crimes against humanity, not yet realizing that both sides serve the same hidden masters.

 

[SonofaBor]

the left want things to "go back to normal", so they go along to get along, while the population of the right want the political left to be held accountable for their crimes against humanity,

What is most interesting to me is that for the first time in my life I see ordinary people on the right facing up to their own crimes-- their so-called patriotic and certainly idiotic-- foreign wars. The only people on the right who I don't see fess up to these crimes are the aging political agitators who work at, for example, Fox News. People like Hannity and O'Reily (I know this arcane for any non-U.S. reader). These morons were cheerleading for war; nowadays, they are interviewing Trump. Trump was the only President in my life who avoided that trap, so far as possible. Like Trump and his jab comments, this is confusing.

Nonetheless, I never thought this admission would happen. But here I am in a deep red state, and people know they were hoodwinked and f'd up. Can we see the same change on the so-called left? Will they ever realize that the state/corporation is a false god that has left them poorer, stupider and sicker than they were created to be? In other words, will they embrace the criticism always leveled against them by the right? I don't know.

If they do, wow, things could really change. If Trump really took the jab, maybe he is, as @Mabzynn once hinted, a divine intervention-- planning, as it were, to suffer for our sins. Weird, I know. Sacrilegious, perhaps. True? How should I know?

The weird only gets weirder.

their leaders are also owned

Probably by the U.N. and the clean corporate gangsters who run gambling and entertainment. They also serve as, perhaps unwitting, protectors of the national collateral, called Wilderness areas.

 

[Collapseinrealtime]

Like Trump and his jab comments, this is confusing.

It only seems confusing to one that does not make the connection that this is a game designed to trigger reactions from particular demographics.

Since my post here yesterday, I'm already seeing numerous media reactions to Trump's interview all over the place, including from Biden and Fauci praising his support of the vax, while others are defending Trump, saying that if he didn't initiate Operation: Warp Speed, then millions of Americans would have perished from their "original" plan of locking down the country for 3-5 years before the actual vaccine rollout.

The equal and opposite reaction of his interview is clearly stirring the pot and raising the heat. The mainstream "conservative" media could have easily ignored the aspect of Trump getting booed by his supporters, but instead, O'Reilly doubled down. In another interview, O'Reilly reported that Trump later complained to him that he was bummed out for getting booed.

We are seeing a staged pandemonium playing out before our awakened eyes.

By the end of this particularly strange news "cycle", millions of viewers who have tuned into this planned psyop will have been shifted into a new level of awareness, as the mainstream reportage will hemorrhage into the alternative media reportage, from Newsmax to Fox to CNN to Alex Jones to Mel K to Gene Decode and so on, exposing mainstream audiences to the alternative media's coverage perhaps for the very first time, since the conservative and liberal normies will be hunting for all possible coverage, while those awakened and in the process of awakening will be trying to wrap their heads around whose side Trump is really on. This will inevitably lead to some kind of follow up interview with Trump where he will be cornered into clarifying his overall stance on the issue, and O'Reilly would be the perfect interviewer to do just that, gathering potentially the largest possible audience from both sides of the political spectrum.

If what I'm thinking is correct and on the track, we're about to see a stark shift in the narrative that will drastically expose the fraud of particularly the mainstream media, raising a new level of awareness in the general populace such as we have perhaps never before witnessed. Trump's handlers have carefully crafted this fiasco for just that reason.

 

[SonofaBor]

That is certainly an optimistic assessment. To be honest, I don't follow the mainstream media much. It does need to fall. Internal contradictions that lead to implosion is the best scenario. There are many of us waiting with knowledge and answers should that occur.

 

[Collapseinrealtime]

That is certainly an optimistic assessment. To be honest, I don't follow the mainstream media much. It does need to fall. Internal contradictions that lead to implosion is the best scenario.

I'm not particularly optimistic, one way or the other. I'm just calling out an Op when I see one. As I suspected would begin to happen, the alternative media, beginning with Chicken Little himself, Alex Jones, has launched his take on Trump's O'Reilly interview, interviewing a "former Trump supporter", and note her name...wait for it...Alison Steinberg, whose video has apparently gone viral of her calling out Trump for supporting and taking credit for the vax rollout.


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/tlDbCLBkGcxJ/


Which isn't to say that I'm not generally optimistic that the old world order is indeed falling to pieces. I'm just pointing out that it is another 9/11 event, that is, a controlled demolition by the Cabal themselves who are now using their alternative media operatives to push this demolition agenda further along.