The Daily Fake
- Thread starter feralimal
- Start date
The Vulcan aka Peregrine 1 spacecraft, the first private attempt to land on the moon, took off on Monday and within hours ‘the propellant leaked’ and it’s not going to get there.
Peregrine 1 has ‘no chance’ of landing on moon due to fuel leak
Mysteriously it was going to land on February 23rd which is a 46 day trip to the moon. The Apollo 11 mission took 4 days and six hours. No one seems to have questioned why it was so slow given that it was a ‘very powerful rocket’. None of the story seemed to make ‘scientific’ sense unless of course they’re attempting to prove the existence of a firmament. Incidentally, another recent story suggested the reason that an asteroid will never destroy the earth is that there seems to be a protective barrier around the earth. Not so much Daily Fake …
Earth may have built-in defence system to protect planet from killer asteroids
Your earlier message regarding the Truman show might be closer to reality than ‘outer space’. Or we’re in a simulation. But I do think the simulation theory is a bit of a psy-op as in it’s a cop-out for the liars. I believe we’re real but the basic infrastructure of this earth is not at all what we’ve been told. A lifetime fake not just a daily one. Watch The Lost History of a Flat Earth by Ewaranon to have your mind blown. You don’t have to believe it but it makes you question so many things and that’s always a good thing (for us not them).
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
- Messages
- 515
- Reaction score
- 946
Yeah i think that the matrix concept is a psy op because every imbecile that calls himself a transhumanist one way or another believes in it. And thanks for the video tip, will look into it!
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,140
- Reaction score
- 2,176
I don't have any special information, but I would imagine they appall themselves with their own greed and immorality, get scared about receiving their just desserts, but want to hold on to their goodies (and lives) and start planning bolt holes. Even though you can't escape yourself.
I don't think there are any special events coming either, but again, if you have people acting in fear, they are easier to control and direct. So why not ramp up any narrative that increases fear?
Hopefully this thread decreases fear, by trying to peak behind the curtain, at the unimpressive, unlikely, occasionally humorous events that are conjured into consciousness. Real things do happen, but mostly there are no strong reasons to hold that what is being presented is being presented in good faith, a genuine attempt to present truth. There are always alternative explanations available, but as we are not aware of all the facts we cannot come to a satisfactory conclusion. We can never be aware of external facts in order to come to truth, but we can fall into the trap of believing we know and be misled. We can know lies.
Last edited:
Mmm - we can however be very aware of external lies, and the fact that we are being lied to inevitably leads to the question: Why are ‘they’ lying to us? Surely the truth would be much simpler. As Sir Walter Scott (allegedly) said: ‘Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.’ Disentangling the web will be difficult. It spells the end for the spell-casters but I’m looking forward to it. Bring it on!
And just to add a word about the ‘elites’ being appalled at their own immorality - really? Have you heard of dupers’ delight? The smug smirk, the obvious baiting of the common people, the massive hints being dropped that show the nonsense they’ve fooled us into believing for centuries. They despise us and want to rub our noses in our own stupidity. But, with any luck, they’re beginning to realise it’s time to lie low while (they hope) we will proceed to destroy each other at which point they’ll emerge (again) to claim everything.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,140
- Reaction score
- 2,176
All the best to you in your disentangling
As far as I am concerned, it's the only job worth doing.I agree - we can know lies. I rushed a reply and have since tidied it up to make this very point more clear.
"Why are ‘they’ lying to us?"
I think there is advantage to be had. If you believe a lie I create, you could end up putting some or all of your effort towards whatever cause I steer you towards. You could tithe 10% of your income for example, work for money that I myself can create at will, etc.
This requires the person being lied to to participate. What can the individual do, to make oneself more resilient? How to stop believing and acting upon lies?
This could be the case, for sure. But I don't know that. I don't know any of it, their reasoning, what they did, who they are even. Questions I struggle with, include: Can the child can be responsible for the parents actions? Is it my job to make earth heavenly? When do I take action against another - what evidence do I need?
My position is that I should act only according to what I know, and that's enough. I'm not worried about their souls, I can only concern myself with my own.
Last edited:
Watch on 1.5 speed as the delivery is very slow and the video is very long (but worth it!)
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
- Messages
- 515
- Reaction score
- 946
This should be an obvious option, but since the topic of ancient civiizations + aliens became popular, not a lot of people think about it. Also, i remember a video from one of the ancient aliens guy sayig that certain pyramids are "miilions of years old"......
This was in today’s news. Can anyone explain it to me? The only thing it makes me think is that someone wants incontrovertible proof that the earth is flat.
Architects designed this skyscraper attached to an asteroid to get around building restrictions
Because they went underground last time and survived the flood. Poor dummies don't realize this time He is burning the whole earth...burning all the GMO foods, hybridized humans, chemicals and drugs, melting down all of the infrastructure, metals, etc. All records will be destroyed entirely this time, nothing will survive. My only hope/wish is that those of that endured til the end will remember what it was like before and be able to teach the next civilizations what NOT to do.
Yes, I referenced the Bible. I suggest reading Revelation as more of a technical manual of sorts rather than a mythological account. Things are not always what they seem.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
- Messages
- 75
- Reaction score
- 146
The protocols of the learned elders of zion is the instruction manual. The bible is the playbook.
Both were inspired, created and written by *man* - nothing more.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 1,934
Detail in medieval painting reveals prehistoric artefact - Medievalists.net
A quick hit today.
Researchers believe that an object in a 15th-century painting is actually a handaxe that could be as much as 500,000 years old.
Half a million years ago, our human ancestors began to use large, stone tools known as “Acheulean handaxes,” to cut meat and wood, and dig for tubers. Often made from flint, these prehistoric oval and pear-shaped tools are flaked on both sides and have a pointed end.
Handaxes have long been a source of fascination in our social and cultural history. Prior to the Enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries, people thought that they were of natural origin and referred to them as “thunderstones shot from the clouds,” according to texts, with the earliest records dating back to the mid-1500s.
But researchers from Dartmouth College and the University of Cambridge have identified that “The Melun Diptych” (circa 1452), painted by Jean Fouquet, depicts what is likely the earliest artistic representation of an Acheulean handaxe, demonstrating that these objects had an even earlier place in the modern world. The findings are published in the Cambridge Archaeological Journal.
The researchers found that an Acheulean handaxe appears to have been represented in the left panel. In the painting, Chevalier is depicted wearing a crimson robe with his hands folded together as if he were praying while Saint Stephen, his patron saint, is standing next to him holding the New Testament as a stone object resembling a handaxe rests on top of the book. The stone object symbolizes the death by stoning of Saint Stephen, the first Christian martyr.
The team conducted three analyses. They investigated the overall teardrop shape of the stone object in the painting using an approach called Elliptical Fourier Analysis, which quantifies the shape of an object. They found that its shape was similar (within 95%) to other Acheulean handaxes from the region where the paintings were made.
"Procrustes-transformed": that reads like mockery and revelation of the method to me. The Bed of Procrustes is a metaphor for chopping a phenomenon up until it's the right size to fit into a preordained theory.
Not one but two big historical deceptions are being hammered in with this article...two birds killed with one stone, as it were. The first big lie is of course the fake caveman/500,000 year timeline. The second purpose of the article is erasing the history of thunderstones, which were probably real, by covering it up with this "handaxe" nonsense. A bonus third lie being hammered in is that these garbage statistical analyses constitute "science".
I was already planning on posting this before I read the following paragraph, which caused me great delight:
The researchers counted the flake scars on the surface of the painted stone object. On average, they found 33 flakes on the surface, which was consistent with the average identified on 30 handaxes that were randomly selected from their French handaxe assemblages.
There's your smoking gun: a gratuitous 33 to confirm that the people producing this trash are not innocent dupes but on the contrary know exactly what they're doing.
A quick hit today.
Researchers believe that an object in a 15th-century painting is actually a handaxe that could be as much as 500,000 years old.
Half a million years ago, our human ancestors began to use large, stone tools known as “Acheulean handaxes,” to cut meat and wood, and dig for tubers. Often made from flint, these prehistoric oval and pear-shaped tools are flaked on both sides and have a pointed end.
Handaxes have long been a source of fascination in our social and cultural history. Prior to the Enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries, people thought that they were of natural origin and referred to them as “thunderstones shot from the clouds,” according to texts, with the earliest records dating back to the mid-1500s.
But researchers from Dartmouth College and the University of Cambridge have identified that “The Melun Diptych” (circa 1452), painted by Jean Fouquet, depicts what is likely the earliest artistic representation of an Acheulean handaxe, demonstrating that these objects had an even earlier place in the modern world. The findings are published in the Cambridge Archaeological Journal.
The researchers found that an Acheulean handaxe appears to have been represented in the left panel. In the painting, Chevalier is depicted wearing a crimson robe with his hands folded together as if he were praying while Saint Stephen, his patron saint, is standing next to him holding the New Testament as a stone object resembling a handaxe rests on top of the book. The stone object symbolizes the death by stoning of Saint Stephen, the first Christian martyr.
The team conducted three analyses. They investigated the overall teardrop shape of the stone object in the painting using an approach called Elliptical Fourier Analysis, which quantifies the shape of an object. They found that its shape was similar (within 95%) to other Acheulean handaxes from the region where the paintings were made.
"Procrustes-transformed": that reads like mockery and revelation of the method to me. The Bed of Procrustes is a metaphor for chopping a phenomenon up until it's the right size to fit into a preordained theory.
Not one but two big historical deceptions are being hammered in with this article...two birds killed with one stone, as it were. The first big lie is of course the fake caveman/500,000 year timeline. The second purpose of the article is erasing the history of thunderstones, which were probably real, by covering it up with this "handaxe" nonsense. A bonus third lie being hammered in is that these garbage statistical analyses constitute "science".
I was already planning on posting this before I read the following paragraph, which caused me great delight:
The researchers counted the flake scars on the surface of the painted stone object. On average, they found 33 flakes on the surface, which was consistent with the average identified on 30 handaxes that were randomly selected from their French handaxe assemblages.
There's your smoking gun: a gratuitous 33 to confirm that the people producing this trash are not innocent dupes but on the contrary know exactly what they're doing.
Last edited:
Maybe I should clarify. I've been studying the Torah (Gen, Exo, Lev, Num, Deut) and recently finished writing Joshua (its how I memorize). I so far think the Gospels are fine, BUT I have serious issues with any book that Paul wrote in the NT. Recently I watched a fairly good video talking about how the Catholic church and the Jesuits (basically the military arm of the Vatican) have been rewriting and corrupting scriptures since 560 BC. I've also done a bit of study on the Sumerians and their belief systems and found some parallels. So I am agreeing with you in part.
Which is why it is important that we seek the Source Himself.
D
Deleted member 1432
Guest
I see this thread has deteriorated into the usual 'Play it again Sam' off-topic drivel.
Shame.
Shame.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
- Messages
- 75
- Reaction score
- 146
I love it! And we can refer to those that believe this nonsense as having cranial rectitus!
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 1,934
Today's article is perhaps not a "fake" in itself, but it retroactively qualifies a lot of prior work as fake.
Scientists have apparently just discovered a new form of magnetism:
Altermagnetism: A new type of magnetism, with broad implications for technology and research
Altermagnets have a special combination of the arrangement of spins and crystal symmetries. The spins alternate, as in antiferromagnets, resulting in no net magnetization. Yet, rather than simply canceling out, the symmetries give an electronic band structure with strong spin polarization that flips in direction as you pass through the material's energy bands—hence the name altermagnets. This results in highly useful properties more resemblant to ferromagnets, as well as some completely new properties.
My understanding of the difference between Maxwell's equations, as written in their original quaternion notation, and Heaviside's "translation" of them into conventional notation, is that the Heaviside equations treat opposite vectors as canceled-out zeroes and discard them, whereas the original equations somehow kept this polarity. Here we see something similar, if I'm not mistaken: the opposing vectors cancel out upon first inspection, but on another level, unseen until now, their polarity also generates a subtle surplus phenomenon. Einstein did NOT know Maxwell's original equations, only Heaviside's reduced versions, and apparently this is common.
"That's the magic about altermagnets," says Tomáš Jungwirth from the Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, principal investigator of the study. "Something that people believed was impossible until recent theoretical predictions [showed it] is in fact possible."
Here we encounter once again the weird epistemological blind spot at the heart of institutional science. Scientists seem incapable of stopping themselves from decreeing things "impossible" in advance because the mathemagic told them so. What arrogance. And then one day, oops...uh actually there's another form of magnetism we never saw because the equations told us it was impossible, please forget we ever said that. But this time we really know what's impossible, trust us! They're no better than the economists with their worthless Nobel Prizes. I call it the neurotic fantasy of epistemological closure, and scientists, who ought to be the last people to fall for it, seem, thanks some uncanny constitutional short-circuit between their professed ideals and their obsessional personality types/emotional needs, inevitably to begin to believe that even if they don't know everything, at least they know more or less where the line between possible and impossible lies. Pure hubris!
Murmurings that a new type of magnetism was lurking began not long ago: In 2019, Jungwirth together with theoretical colleagues at the Czech Academy of Sciences and University of Mainz identified a class of magnetic materials with a spin structure that did not fit within the classic descriptions of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism.
"Altermagnetism is actually not something hugely complicated. It is something entirely fundamental that was in front of our eyes for decades without noticing it," says Jungwirth. "And it is not something that exists only in a few obscure materials. It exists in many crystals that people simply had in their drawers.
Not "decades"...forever.
So how many other mysterious properties do those household crystals possess? How many other "fundamental" forces and processes that were "right in front of our eyes" are today dismissed as impossible on prima facie grounds by the same arrogant science scum who claimed they knew everything there was to know about magnetism?
Scientists have apparently just discovered a new form of magnetism:
Altermagnetism: A new type of magnetism, with broad implications for technology and research
Altermagnets have a special combination of the arrangement of spins and crystal symmetries. The spins alternate, as in antiferromagnets, resulting in no net magnetization. Yet, rather than simply canceling out, the symmetries give an electronic band structure with strong spin polarization that flips in direction as you pass through the material's energy bands—hence the name altermagnets. This results in highly useful properties more resemblant to ferromagnets, as well as some completely new properties.
My understanding of the difference between Maxwell's equations, as written in their original quaternion notation, and Heaviside's "translation" of them into conventional notation, is that the Heaviside equations treat opposite vectors as canceled-out zeroes and discard them, whereas the original equations somehow kept this polarity. Here we see something similar, if I'm not mistaken: the opposing vectors cancel out upon first inspection, but on another level, unseen until now, their polarity also generates a subtle surplus phenomenon. Einstein did NOT know Maxwell's original equations, only Heaviside's reduced versions, and apparently this is common.
"That's the magic about altermagnets," says Tomáš Jungwirth from the Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, principal investigator of the study. "Something that people believed was impossible until recent theoretical predictions [showed it] is in fact possible."
Here we encounter once again the weird epistemological blind spot at the heart of institutional science. Scientists seem incapable of stopping themselves from decreeing things "impossible" in advance because the mathemagic told them so. What arrogance. And then one day, oops...uh actually there's another form of magnetism we never saw because the equations told us it was impossible, please forget we ever said that. But this time we really know what's impossible, trust us! They're no better than the economists with their worthless Nobel Prizes. I call it the neurotic fantasy of epistemological closure, and scientists, who ought to be the last people to fall for it, seem, thanks some uncanny constitutional short-circuit between their professed ideals and their obsessional personality types/emotional needs, inevitably to begin to believe that even if they don't know everything, at least they know more or less where the line between possible and impossible lies. Pure hubris!
Murmurings that a new type of magnetism was lurking began not long ago: In 2019, Jungwirth together with theoretical colleagues at the Czech Academy of Sciences and University of Mainz identified a class of magnetic materials with a spin structure that did not fit within the classic descriptions of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism.
"Altermagnetism is actually not something hugely complicated. It is something entirely fundamental that was in front of our eyes for decades without noticing it," says Jungwirth. "And it is not something that exists only in a few obscure materials. It exists in many crystals that people simply had in their drawers.
Not "decades"...forever.
So how many other mysterious properties do those household crystals possess? How many other "fundamental" forces and processes that were "right in front of our eyes" are today dismissed as impossible on prima facie grounds by the same arrogant science scum who claimed they knew everything there was to know about magnetism?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,140
- Reaction score
- 2,176
Yes, it's funny. I call this 'explanatory science/maths' or 'parallel construction'.
From Parallel construction - Wikipedia
You can use maths or science to explain whatever idea you like, if you try hard enough...
Everything is fake and gay 
But let's do it
I just open Google Chrome search the work "Archaeologists" and select the first of the list. What can I say? They never disappoint me
Archaeologists stunned by truth behind 280-million-year-old fossil
Analysis has revealed that the animal’s dark body outline – initially thought to be soft tissues – is just paint
A 280-million-year-old reptile fossil that puzzled researchers for decades is a fake, archaeologists have said.
Analysis of the creature, dubbed Tridentinosaurus antiquus, has revealed the material that was thought to be well-preserved, ancient soft tissue is, in fact, just black paint.
The lizard-like animal, about 20cm (8in) long, was discovered in the Italian Alps in 1931 and was believed to be an important finding that could help shed light on how reptiles evolved.
With its body outline appearing dark on the surrounding rock, the reptile’s remarkable preservation was previously attributed to a fossilisation process known as carbonisation, which is relatively common among plant specimens but rare among animals.
This led the Tridentinosaurus to be classified as a member of the reptile group known as Protorosauria and its purported fossilised skin, although never studied in detail, gained prominence in news articles and books. However, the strange features of the fossil left many palaeontologists wondering where the reptile belonged and how did it come to be so well-preserved.
A team of researchers in Ireland and Italy analysed the fossil using UV photography, which revealed a coating material on the specimen.
The researchers said that coating fossils with varnishes or lacquers was quite common in the past as a way to preserve the specimen.
So the team was hoping that beneath the coating layer, original soft tissues would be present and would be in good condition.
However, a microscopic analysis then revealed the texture and composition of the material did not match that of genuine soft tissue fossils. The researchers said their findings revealed the body outline of the Tridentinosaurus was artificially created with black paint, coated on the carved lizard-shaped rock surface.
Based on their findings, published in the journal Palaeontology, the researchers are urging caution about the fossil and how it is used in future research.
Professor Evelyn Kustatscher, a palaeobotanist at the Natural Science Museum of South Tyrol in Italy, said: “The peculiar preservation of Tridentinosaurus had puzzled experts for decades.
“Now, it all makes sense.
“What was described as carbonised skin is just paint.”
Dr Valentina Rossi, of University College Cork’s School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences in Ireland, added: “Fossil soft tissues are rare, but when found in a fossil they can reveal important biological information, for instance, the external colouration, internal anatomy and physiology.
“The answer to all our questions was right in front of us, we had to study this fossil specimen in detail to reveal its secrets – even those that perhaps we did not want to know.”
However, the researchers said that despite the setback, the fossil is not a complete forgery.
The bones of the hindlimbs and the femurs appear to be genuine but poorly preserved, they said.
But let's do itI just open Google Chrome search the work "Archaeologists" and select the first of the list. What can I say? They never disappoint me
Archaeologists stunned by truth behind 280-million-year-old fossil
Analysis has revealed that the animal’s dark body outline – initially thought to be soft tissues – is just paint
A 280-million-year-old reptile fossil that puzzled researchers for decades is a fake, archaeologists have said.
Analysis of the creature, dubbed Tridentinosaurus antiquus, has revealed the material that was thought to be well-preserved, ancient soft tissue is, in fact, just black paint.
The lizard-like animal, about 20cm (8in) long, was discovered in the Italian Alps in 1931 and was believed to be an important finding that could help shed light on how reptiles evolved.
With its body outline appearing dark on the surrounding rock, the reptile’s remarkable preservation was previously attributed to a fossilisation process known as carbonisation, which is relatively common among plant specimens but rare among animals.
This led the Tridentinosaurus to be classified as a member of the reptile group known as Protorosauria and its purported fossilised skin, although never studied in detail, gained prominence in news articles and books. However, the strange features of the fossil left many palaeontologists wondering where the reptile belonged and how did it come to be so well-preserved.
A team of researchers in Ireland and Italy analysed the fossil using UV photography, which revealed a coating material on the specimen.
The researchers said that coating fossils with varnishes or lacquers was quite common in the past as a way to preserve the specimen.
So the team was hoping that beneath the coating layer, original soft tissues would be present and would be in good condition.
However, a microscopic analysis then revealed the texture and composition of the material did not match that of genuine soft tissue fossils. The researchers said their findings revealed the body outline of the Tridentinosaurus was artificially created with black paint, coated on the carved lizard-shaped rock surface.
Based on their findings, published in the journal Palaeontology, the researchers are urging caution about the fossil and how it is used in future research.
Professor Evelyn Kustatscher, a palaeobotanist at the Natural Science Museum of South Tyrol in Italy, said: “The peculiar preservation of Tridentinosaurus had puzzled experts for decades.
“Now, it all makes sense.
“What was described as carbonised skin is just paint.”
Dr Valentina Rossi, of University College Cork’s School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences in Ireland, added: “Fossil soft tissues are rare, but when found in a fossil they can reveal important biological information, for instance, the external colouration, internal anatomy and physiology.
“The answer to all our questions was right in front of us, we had to study this fossil specimen in detail to reveal its secrets – even those that perhaps we did not want to know.”
However, the researchers said that despite the setback, the fossil is not a complete forgery.
The bones of the hindlimbs and the femurs appear to be genuine but poorly preserved, they said.
Similar threads
