SH Archive The missing link to ancient power

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Jaska
Date: 2019-10-31 11:58:42
Reaction Score: 0

I know some but not all google mediaples run on a metal box about a metre or rwo in size that contains a water splitting tech that produces hydrogen and oxygen and they use the hydrogen to generate electricity.
Cannot remember the name of the company but is an American company and they make the etch in home sized units, or the did but the United States government banned the sale of them, if memory is serving.

Would that technique require that much water ?
If hydrogen burns & only leaves heat & water, wouldn't it be normal to reuse that water ?

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2019-10-31 12:13:27
Reaction Score: 2

Would that technique require that much water ?
If hydrogen burns & only leaves heat & water, wouldn't it be normal to reuse that water ?

Brain cell went 'ping' and duckduckgo and thregister found these chaps.
https://www.bloomenergy.com/
TheRegister article is from 2010 so I didn't realise how far back it was when I first heard of thee things.
I used to use a hydrogen torch r lead burning a long time ago. Never produced a lot of heat and no visible steam. Beyond that I have no anwer to your questions. Luxumburg is really small so how muh water could the people drink in a day or a year?

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Jaska
Date: 2019-10-31 12:33:07
Reaction Score: 2

Brain cell went 'ping' and duckduckgo and thregister found these chaps.
https://www.bloomenergy.com/
TheRegister article is from 2010 so I didn't realise how far back it was when I first heard of thee things.
I used to use a hydrogen torch r lead burning a long time ago. Never produced a lot of heat and no visible steam. Beyond that I have no anwer to your questions. Luxumburg is really small so how muh water could the people drink in a day or a year?

It was said, their need for water would be extremely high & would be 10% of the drinkingwater, if they had to rely on that, especially during summer months. They would normally take it from a nearby river, if there was enough water, but yet noone has permission to take out that much water from the rivers.

The final decision if they settle here is not yet taken, but they own yet land, size about 50 soccer fields.

Hard to find exact data about how much drinkwater used daily in Luxembourg, numbers I found vary slighty, but it could be 120 000 m3 daily.

Thanks for the links

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Tart Aryan
Date: 2019-10-31 12:37:16
Reaction Score: 6

Yea, I understand that, I can relate to it well. However, in my case, as is always the case when you're on the right path, information will gel and come together, which it has for us now with so-called antigravity. We definitely understand the principles of how it works and are now working on replicating and experimentation using what has been deciphered.

I don't think Ken is missing much, not in terms of the fundamental basic reality of how Universe works, for example: Mathematically the smallest pixialtion of matterm according to quantum physics is in the form of a Tetrahedron: It's not an accident that Star War used that shape to depict Star Destroyers. This shape is mathematically calculated to be the shape which forms the building blocks of our reality and hence it's relationship to gravity and the fabric of the Universe. There is nothing wrong with this formulation, except the description of this shape relationship to matter is itself wrong, because it's not matter which is described by this shape, rather it is energy itself.

So it seems there is something seriously wrong with the way knowledge is now being abused by so-called quantum physics. Quantum physics is a retelling of the Einsteinian concept of reality and it's wrong. Space is not a fabric and it cannot be bent, nor is space composed of particles just because there may be particles or bits of matter floating around in space. A magnetic field is not composed of particles.
Nor is space a divided up sub super microscopic place composed of a a crystalline lattice whose smallest dimensional shape is a tetrahedron, which is what quantum physics wants us all to believe, and that narrative is essentially a retelling of the Einsteinian model of spacetime, which does not exist. It's a corrupted teaching that warps the truth of how Universe works. Rather this shape of the Tetrahedron is infact a model of the shape of the ultimate reduction of energy and not matter.

See, in quantum physics we are all shadows, composed of quasi-crystalline patterns, and which are cast off by a higher dimension. That is a gross lie and a load of horse shit that's being packaged for the young by corrupt and evil people. They are selling a pipe dream which has been carefully crafted to lead to a nightmare world, and like the famous Pied Piper whom lead all the children off to never, never, land, this BS quantum world of shadows and quasi crystals is composed of stolen ideas. These ideas are corruptly repackaged and designed to lead these next generations off into another fantasy land research; just like Einstein did, and thereby keep us in chains for another 100 years or more.

I think what you're seeing as missing elements comes out of this pollution. Wheelers simplex dieletric theory is pure and easy to understand by comparison. You're not going to need a PHD in mathematics to understand Kens theory and that's problem one for the system. In other words, the criminally operated for profit educational organization cannot profit from this model of reality.

Again, another reason we have this confusion by intentional pollution is it is not in the interest of the military, Universities, Colleges, and most other formalized research groups to throw Einstein and Quantum Physics in the dumpster.

Remember Tesla said Einstein was an idiot. We only know of Einstein because of the academic crowns that officialdoom bestowed upon him, and they did that because academia decided it would also join organized crime by tossing truth out the window in order to make money instead, and also they could excuse this treason on the pretext that it was necessary for national security to teach a corrupt and useless physics as the truth: There's a lot more money harvested out of the physics of fantasy than out of Ken Wheelers which can be learned by anyone, doesn't cost 100K, and doesn't take 4 to 6 years to learn either.

Electricity comes out of counterspace as a dielectric energy which is no polarized, all energy is composed of a hypervelocity dielectric inertial energy field that surrounds us at all times just as Tesla said it did; There is nothing else beyond that, there are no other dimensions of any kind, there is only our dimension and there is the background sea of energy which we and all the rest of the Universe reside in.

Inertial force is what energy itself is, and it is stored in a hyperspatial energy field which surrounds us at all times in every place. All energy is itself all from a single source. Energies moving at velocities billions of times our local light speed is where Universe stores energy and it's where Universe draws energy out of. This conterspatial energy field has been mathematically calculated and theorized so there is a formalized hypothesis about the relative velocity of hyperspace.

Remember this one? Remember that in the movie Star Wars they refer to hyperspace and not dimensions? This is an accurate depiction of our present technology, or at least someones technology, and I know this because I've seen this myself. I've seen a tetrahedron and I've seen it move at least as fast as the image depicted here when it first arrives. This is not moving in to another dimension. It's catching on to counterspace, like grabbing a hold of speeding train, that energy field is what drives these ships. Now there's a lot more to this but that's the basic idea.

Other dimensions are lies which are being cultivated to be used against the population later on: The purpose of which is to keep a corrupt physics intact so that the breakaway civilization can control this world with a criminally inspired plan to palce a corrupted physic in a position of rulership over what will be considered rational thought. In it's new position of absolute authority, the system will use hoax's against the population by telling then that "Aliens are launching Inter-dimensional attacks" against Earth.

That narrative, already visible by the way, will be the excuse used in the future as an explanation for assorted draconian control measures, but underneath these measures the main purpose will be to literally criminalize any resistance to the absolute authority of the educational systems peer reviewed elastical courts of physics, and any opposing ideas will be labeled heresy and a sign of mental illness. This is on the front door right now. Religion is dying and science is to be the new religion literally speaking, complete with what will be convert committee's of inquiry that will deem opposition as either insane or a terrorist. Thereby insuring that this new planned dark age will prevail over the forces of light.

Quantum physics is primarily aimed at maintaining the existing Einsteinian based science fiction narrative, and so the real science (which I strongly suspect is already driving hyperspatial ships across our own galaxy) can be kept secret and so that the people of Earth can be used as resources for an alternative civilization which already exists and is now engaged in the next phase of enslavement.

We can probably only defeat this by breaking their grip over absolute control over education and power. That's why what you're working on is critical and that's why I've scribbled all this down.

Wheeler said long before this linked patent I've included that there really is no such thing as super conduction. That is, super conductivity is only the unimpeded movement of counterspace. This was a little bamboozling for a while. Now recently there's been three patents that were released. This one is the most significant of the three.

This is the so called Room Temp Super Conducting Cable Patent. It is fairly well written which is an exception and doesn't resort to botched physics.
US20190058105A1 - Piezoelectricity-induced Room Temperature Superconductor - Google Patents

Now, in your work there are some keys to pay attention to. These include vibration or frequency, pulsed polarized electrical charge, and materials. What kind of materials depends on what you're trying to accomplish and so forth. Really one has to start with what a dielectric material I think. Teflon for example is a dielectric and it's also very slippery which when combined with a high frequency or vibration can also create a state where super conductivity occurs.

Quartz is a dielectric and it is also a transducer that converts the dielectric counterspatial energy in to electricity. Quartz fills with a dielectric energy through our surrounding dielectric energy field which we are constantly bathed in, and when stressed it will release this energy in a burst of polarized electrical energy. It isn't static electricity that fills a piezoelectric quartz lighters rock every second. It's counterspace's dielectric energy field which fill it the same way a magnet can take that same field and focus it to a point in the so-called blotch wall. That's where the electrical field comes out of but it is first a dielectric field which is an insulator, and it's an insulator because it's not organized, it's not coherent and polarized, but a material like quartz takes this dielectric background radiation and partitions it in to a dipole field so that once it's stressed it discharges are polarized on opposite sides of the crystal. It does this recharging immediately.

The shape of a crystal and it's alignment with other crystals determines the outcome of the dielectric field, that is, whether it's a magnet, a rock with an incoherent but still measurable magnetic field, or an electrical discharge due to the dielectric field being stressed. Stressing means polarizing. It means creating a dipole field in matter which is polarized, and so long as it is in that state it acts as an insulator. When it's stressed by over charging or by other means such a pressure is when the dipole field discharges as a polarized electrical field.

In the RTSC Patent one of the enabling concepts is that a high frequency vibration is required ( it is the enabling tool) and which is provided by linear pulsed polarized charge sent down a coil which surrounds another coaxial type cable. See the illustration. The core is a dielectric material such as teflon which is then encased in an aluminum wrapping. This high frequency vibration is mimicking the background dielectric fields hypervelocity. The higher the frequency the greater the outcome.

In the base of most early UFO's are plates filled with crushed high Q quartz and backed on either side by plates. See the McCandlish Illustration. Do an image search because I'm not posting Marks drawings without his permission for anyone. It's all over the place and the plates on the bottom of the vehicle. Now these plates are operating very similar to the manner in which the RTSC Patent works. However, this quartz is in fact being stimulated to create a high frequency vibration and then a possible discharge which is reflected off an aluminum plate covering a sandwich of metal conductor plates which also act as pick-ups for this polarized piezoelectric discharge.

Aluminum becomes super conductive only in the presence of a moving magnetic field. Running a magnet across a sheet of aluminum normally causes the aluminum to become mildly magnetic, so called paramagnetic, and what's really going on here is that the aluminum creates a temporary alignment with the moving magnetic field so that it becomes an extension of the magnet passing over it and in the same polarity. This is however very weak until you add a vibration to this effect. When you add vibration the paramagnetism jumps to become super conductive. It's a huge change in what takes place due to this vibration and so why is that? It's because the vibration is re-creating a path for hyperspatial energy which is dielectric and the magnetic field organizes that instantly into a dipole field.

Just remember what I said about corrupt science and official academia. If it weren't for Tesla we would all be strangled by power cords and energy stations every few blocks thanks to the criminal Edison.

Anyways your thinking is well placed, their science isn't, that is, I think you have good reasoning ability if only you didn't have a pack of lying slackards trying to fill your head with crackpot BS like particles, black holes, and quantum underwear which is everywhere.

Cones are certainly interesting. Bee's and most all insects have an abundance of cones on their bodies. Look up Phillip Callahan.
Ok well I'm exhausted having scribble all this down. I won't be writing you any more books OK?

Instead I look forward to what you have to say and will endeavor to contain myself.

Don’t have a lot of time to respond to all of this this morning, but I wanted to address what I think Wheeler is missing. I think he’s absolutely right about dielectricity and Magnetism. What I think he’s missing is that dielectricity induces a different field. An electric field. You have a parallel opposite to magnetism. It behaves exactly the same only it exists in dielectric and diamagnetic objects. Leedskalnin mentioned this as magnetic current and was laughed at. Magnetic current induces an electric field. Electric current induces a magnetic field when applied to a conductor. Electric fields are made in an insulator. I have searched for this opposite unknown “force” for 15 years. Why I’m so positive that it exists is because recently there were major problems with electronics being made smaller and smaller and the classical electrodynamics wasn’t working in designs. The solution to these problems was quantum electrodynamics which I’m not too concerned with. But, then there is also one fundamental change that I said finally ok I am on the right path. They had to“invent” a “virtual” current called “magnetic current” that is an inverse to electricity and uses the same formulas. They need it for calculations in some interesting stuff, unfortunately they don’t acknowledge it’s real. From my understanding to create an elecret you would need “magnetic current.” Magnetic current in an insulator creates an electric field around the insulator. Electric current in a conductor creates an electric field.

I am positive there are two inverse forces like 2 snakes wrapping around a rod. Science is reluctantly moving to this truth to be able to progress.

Here is the reverse of static electricity in a conductor. Science tells us when you remove the electric current the magnetic field goes away... looks like they’re missing something. It’s also interesting that the only part of the wire touching the 2 pieces of metal was insulated too, no? I wonder how wheeler would explain this.

 

[madroona]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: madroona
Date: 2019-10-31 12:53:34
Reaction Score: 2

UTTERLY fascinating and opens so many doors to so many ideas.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Starmonkey
Date: 2019-10-31 14:08:20
Reaction Score: 2

Torsion? Concentric rings you could manually separate that set up an attractive field... Babbling.
The cones... Similar to power units in Philadelphia Experiment. Once they got it goin, they had a real hard time shutting it down.
I think that also reflects on what went down with the former electric grid. Feedback loop. IF there got to be too much particulate matter in the atmosphere from volcanoes, earthquakes, etc, it could have overloaded the system's ability to transfer.
Clean those poles!
Tesla used a lot of copper. What's conductive difference between elements used? Gold, silver, copper...

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Tart Aryan
Date: 2019-10-31 14:32:16
Reaction Score: 1

UTTERLY fascinating and opens so many doors to so many ideas.

Another interesting thing about that is that people put leads on those pieces and when you separate them they release electricity. It’s like electrical locking instead of magnetic locking.

 

[madroona]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: madroona
Date: 2019-10-31 15:02:20
Reaction Score: 0

Another interesting thing about that is that people put leads on those pieces and when you separate them they release electricity. It’s like electrical locking instead of magnetic locking.

It would be most interesting to suspend one of the two blocks perpendicular to the downward force, and see how long the attractive force can hold on.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Tart Aryan
Date: 2019-10-31 16:11:18
Reaction Score: 1

It would be most interesting to suspend one of the two blocks perpendicular to the downward force, and see how long the attractive force can hold on.

People have made them and hung them up for 10 years and they still hold.

@Dielectric maybe you can see the funnels I was talking about better in this image. It's got it's issues but it illustrates the black hole white hole point. I think this setup is the same in smaller objects.

 

[Dielectric]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Dielectric
Date: 2019-10-31 16:17:01
Reaction Score: 2

Don’t have a lot of time to respond to all of this this morning, but I wanted to address what I think Wheeler is missing. I think he’s absolutely right about dielectricity and Magnetism. What I think he’s missing is that dielectricity induces a different field. An electric field. You have a parallel opposite to magnetism. It behaves exactly the same only it exists in dielectric and diamagnetic objects. Leedskalnin mentioned this as magnetic current and was laughed at. Magnetic current induces an electric field. Electric current induces a magnetic field when applied to a conductor. Electric fields are made in an insulator. I have searched for this opposite unknown “force” for 15 years. Why I’m so positive that it exists is because recently there were major problems with electronics being made smaller and smaller and the classical electrodynamics wasn’t working in designs. The solution to these problems was quantum electrodynamics which I’m not too concerned with. But, then there is also one fundamental change that I said finally ok I am on the right path. They had to“invent” a “virtual” current called “magnetic current” that is an inverse to electricity and uses the same formulas. They need it for calculations in some interesting stuff, unfortunately they don’t acknowledge it’s real. From my understanding to create an elecret you would need “magnetic current.” Magnetic current in an insulator creates an electric field around the insulator. Electric current in a conductor creates an electric field.

I am positive there are two inverse forces like 2 snakes wrapping around a rod. Science is reluctantly moving to this truth to be able to progress.

Post automatically merged: 10/31/19

Here is the reverse of static electricity in a conductor. Science tells us when you remove the electric current the magnetic field goes away... looks like they’re missing something. It’s also interesting that the only part of the wire touching the 2 pieces of metal was insulated too, no? I wonder how wheeler would explain this.

Sorry for that babbling I scribbled. There's a few errors which should be corrected but let's continue. It's not that you're wrong. I don't think you're wrong. I think maybe I was a little too tired when I scribbled the last.

Yea, great video and a new one to me. I'm familiar with and have read Ed's work. It's a twist on the PMH and a cool one too.

The insulation is doing what? Insulator is what a dielectric is by nature and so what's happening is that instead of creating electricity or magnetism, you've reversed the process and recombined the electrical polarized fields back into a mass which is now back to holding a dielectric field: An incoherent field, which now acts like a woven mat binding together the whole as one, so that energy is now interlaced between the blocks in an unpolarized field which is the dielectric field itself.

Despite what he says in the video that block is still going to have a magnetic field, just that it isn't going to have coherent magnetic field like a magnet.

Basically it's a demonstration of gravity by incoherent magnetism induced by an electromagnetic charge. BTW, a really great find and cool video.

You may have a another perspective which, whether right or wrong, could lead to other significant understandings, because we are on the edge with all this, and even if it is all a well traveled path known by the Military Industrial Complex, the understanding of how this all works is relatively new to ourselves and we are in a discovery phase.

I can understand what you're saying and why you're saying it; "I am positive there are two inverse forces like 2 snakes wrapping around a rod"

If the snakes each represent two ends of a dipole, (the polar opposites as it were), then the rod is the carrier around which both are wrapped. Is this what you're seeing?

 

[wizz33]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: wizz33
Date: 2019-10-31 16:59:08
Reaction Score: 3

some more things on magnetics

 

[Dielectric]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Dielectric
Date: 2019-10-31 17:09:33
Reaction Score: 1

People have made them and hung them up for 10 years and they still hold.

@Dielectric maybe you can see the funnels I was talking about better in this image. It's got it's issues but it illustrates the black hole white hole point. I think this setup is the same in smaller objects.

I see the attraction.

People have made them and hung them up for 10 years and they still hold.

@Dielectric maybe you can see the funnels I was talking about better in this image. It's got it's issues but it illustrates the black hole white hole point. I think this setup is the same in smaller objects.

• Link

Maybe this term of a dielectric is confusing because if you look up "dielectric" you get this explanation that it's an insulator and then it shows an image where there's two charges held apart by an insulating material: A dielectric material.

We are trained to think this insulator is just that and it's keeping energy apart or contained. We aren't trained in the reverse and that a dielectric is a conductor of dielectric energy which is both polarities mixed into one form. Thus the pole the twin interlaced snakes wrap themselves around is this dielectric conduit.

One could say that what you're really seeing with a dielectric insulator is a dielectric conductor. That is, this conductor is literally filling with energy from surrounding space; energy from the ether as it were. In the video the process is reversed and the blocks are bonded together by a dielectric energy field and that field is itself incoherent magnetism.

As you know Ed said there was no such thing as electrons, only tiny, tiny, magnets. That's how Ed envisioned the dielectric field and it's not necessarily incorrect but rather a simplified view.

Video One

It works because you are a dielectric; and that means you're the one which provides a conduit that the coherent magnetic dielectric field is attempting to incorporate.

When you become attached to the magnets it induces a stress on the magnetic field, which means you're now part of dielectric circuit, but one which is both incoherent and also outside of the otherwise coherent magnetic field.

The coherent magnetic field is made up from organized dielectric energy, not polarized but organized and focused, and now that you're introducing yourself into this matrix of organized coherent dielectric energy we call magnetism it produces a stress upon the magnetic field.

The consequence of this act is that the magnetic must now divert off in order to flow through and in to a large dielectric mass, which is you, and in order to do that it must polarize into coherent fields to complete a circuit through your body. This demonstrates what I mean by stressing the dielectric field BTW.

Therefore, at two points the magnets have polarized and the center is the bloch wall which is ground, because counterspace is ground and that's where the magnetic point source is located. Thus he can touch either pole and get nothing, but touch ground and instantly he has power.

This is a testable hypothesis I've whipped up to explain the behavior. Logic says that any suitable dielectric mass should also be able to replicate this instead of using your own body. Naturally a smaller and better dielectric should also be capable of replicating the same results.

"4 Magnetic Poles and White Light."
The second video is lost in misconceptions about the nature of light. We should post that to KD's thread on light.
Hubble Telescope and the Olbers' paradox: where is the space dust?
Olbers' paradox

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Tart Aryan
Date: 2019-10-31 20:45:46
Reaction Score: 5

Sorry for that babbling I scribbled. There's a few errors which should be corrected but let's continue. It's not that you're wrong. I don't think you're wrong. I think maybe I was a little too tired when I scribbled the last.

Yea, great video and a new one to me. I'm familiar with and have read Ed's work. It's a twist on the PMH and a cool one too.

The insulation is doing what? Insulator is what a dielectric is by nature and so what's happening is that instead of creating electricity or magnetism, you've reversed the process and recombined the electrical polarized fields back into a mass which is now back to holding a dielectric field: An incoherent field, which now acts like a woven mat binding together the whole as one, so that energy is now interlaced between the blocks in an unpolarized field which is the dielectric field itself.

Despite what he says in the video that block is still going to have a magnetic field, just that it isn't going to have coherent magnetic field like a magnet.

Basically it's a demonstration of gravity by incoherent magnetism induced by an electromagnetic charge. BTW, a really great find and cool video.

You may have a another perspective which, whether right or wrong, could lead to other significant understandings, because we are on the edge with all this, and even if it is all a well traveled path known by the Military Industrial Complex, the understanding of how this all works is relatively new to ourselves and we are in a discovery phase.

I can understand what you're saying and why you're saying it; "I am positive there are two inverse forces like 2 snakes wrapping around a rod"

If the snakes each represent two ends of a dipole, (the polar opposites as it were), then the rod is the carrier around which both are wrapped. Is this what you're seeing?

As for the snakes not two ends of a dipole more like two separate forces of energy each with + - end swirling in a helical spiral in opposition to each other.

As for your explaination to explain away the Leedskalnin it follows one path I don’t. It explains something with words rather than actions. If you truly understood what was happening here, you’d be making so many new discoveries you wouldn’t know where to start. I have read Wheelers book and watched almost all of his videos. If he has the understanding he thinks he does he’d be reinventing everything. He’d be showing us new things we’d Never seen before similar to that leedskalnin effect in scope. What he does instead is takes already well known and beaten to death science experiments and puts his twist on them with words not actions. Someone truly making breakthroughs would be able to show drastic new things that could not be ignored. I haven’t seen that from him. He is 100% on the right track though in his Dielectric thinking. I 100% agree with him like I said he’s just missing the other side of it which keeps him from truly putting it all together and changing everything. In my search I have found 11 things through my own experimentation that aren’t explainable by science. I work with engineers and am currently in school at night for engineering. I show some of the things to engineers and professors and they have no idea. Some of them get the truth search bug just from seeing it. Only one of these though is something I’ve yet to stumble onto someone else's discovery of them. What I cannot do is profess to know how it all works because I found something unexplainable. Just learning several small things has given me the ability to do other things not seen or understood. Imagine what I could do given true fundamental and complete understanding. I wouldn’t know where to start.

Please don’t interpret any of this as anything other than we are brainstorming, collaborating, and testing and probing each others thinking. I love that and truly appreciate everything you’ve added and others no matter how small or big the contribution. I can easily operate in my life with the complete understand I know nothing. I have no problem with any speculation or any thought no matter how absurd it seems. Throw it all my way. Perhaps I’ve overlooked something, maybe that one little thing pushes me further. Nothing is off the table until everything can be explained and demonstrating and new advances made. So please don’t stop posting your thoughts and don’t be afraid to push mine. 2 things you posted really helped me. We’ll never find the truth unless we push each other and teach other.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Jaska
Date: 2019-10-31 21:02:40
Reaction Score: 1

People have made them and hung them up for 10 years and they still hold.

So that process has made the atoms bond together, in a way up & downward forces cannot break, but sidewards forces can.

Could this have to do with the thin layer of air that is still inbetween before that electromagnetic process ?
Dry air is dielectric, although it contains always bit of watervapor.

...
I work with engineers and am currently in school at night for engineering. I show some of the things to engineers and professors and they have no idea. Some of them get the truth search bug just from seeing it. Only one of these though is something I’ve yet to stumble onto someone else's discovery of them. What I cannot do is profess to know how it all works because I found something unexplainable. Just learning several small things has given me the ability to do other things not seen or understood. Imagine what I could do given true fundamental and complete understanding. I wouldn’t know where to start.

Professors & other researchers r not allowed to think outside the official box ! Most just want to keep their job, some aren't able due to indoctrination. There is so much suppressed knowledge, twisted truth or relative bullshit & absolute nonsense !

We know next to nothing about WATER. It's special, very special, doesn't follow the laws of physics.
It's a solvent, cleaner, transporter & transmitter of energy. It has memory, it takes on all of the frequency patterns of stuff it comes in touch with. It's everywhere, even in the air we breathe.

The crystalline structure of water (tetrahedron) can be destroyed, like when water is flowing through straight pipes. It can be restructured through swirling, vortexes or minerals like rose quartz, amethyst, rock crystal, ... . It is the geometric pattern, crystalline structure that contains the energy, information, not the matter itself.

 

[madroona]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: madroona
Date: 2019-11-01 00:15:39
Reaction Score: 0

Layers of Mica on them would tell me they were trying to hold a charge in. Layers of Mica in them could just be rock formation or another question.

Thin consistent and engineered layers, with naturally-occurring mica deposits not in the regions involved. I wish I could remember more!

 

[pushamaku]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: pushamaku
Date: 2019-11-01 03:39:35
Reaction Score: 0

I show some of the things to engineers and professors and they have no idea. Some of them get the truth search bug just from seeing it.

What are these things you are showing them?

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: 19m46437h3R
Date: 2019-11-01 04:32:43
Reaction Score: 1

I see the attraction.

Maybe this term of a dielectric is confusing because if you look up "dielectric" you get this explanation that it's an insulator and then it shows an image where there's two charges held apart by an insulating material: A dielectric material.

What is this Dielectric actually? Is it insulator as Science told? Or it refers to something else?

 

[Dielectric]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Dielectric
Date: 2019-11-01 08:43:33
Reaction Score: 5

As for the snakes not two ends of a dipole more like two separate forces of energy each with + - end swirling in a helical spiral in opposition to each other.

That is correct, you are correct; however I think it's possible that it's really one force moving two directions. The best illustration I have for this is a counter flow. See the gif in the link. The file is too large to save for viewing here.

Superfluid helium counterflow animation shows a friction free zero viscosity superflow in the opposite direction of normal gaseous dusty matter.
Kapitza Superfluid Jet Powered Spider Galaxy Cosmology Model

As per Wheeler, there really is neither a positive nor a negative, only one energy appearing to flow two directions.

Now as far as I know we really don't know what this energy is composed of. The historical research I've done shows that around the turn of the last century it was recognized that the ether was composed of something which behaved like a liquid, but obviously was not a liquid, and the closest thing we had to such a substance was liquid helium. From there the work advanced to create a means for producing liquid helium in large amounts, and afterwards to develop isotopes of helium such as III & IV. (*Rutherford and Kipitza).

I think in retrospect we can see this was the beginning of a pathway taken which lead to so-called UFO's and the result of this creation was, in fact, the destruction of academia as a real tool of science, and instead it became a tool for repression of enlightenment under the banner of national security.

So all we really know is that a substance, one which is mimicking a sort of super-ubber-ubber-superfluid, and one which is moving at a very high velocity, many billions of times the speed of light (speed of light is dependent on a rate of induction) is what creates gravity and all other energy.

What I've concluded is that what we think we know is that this energy behaves like a superfluid, and that the inertial kinetic energy carried by this substance, whatever it really may be, is what results in the production of energies. Thus, what seems to be taking place (energy wise) is that matter, in all its' various forms, and being in the way of this moving energy does perturb it in certain ways, such that for example, although it normally passing through matter unimpeded, it still reacts with it in certain fashion, and in most matter this energy we call the ether takes a curved path towards the center of mass before exiting and continuing on.

As for your explaination to explain away the Leedskalnin it follows one path I don’t. It explains something with words rather than actions. If you truly understood what was happening here, you’d be making so many new discoveries you wouldn’t know where to start. I have read Wheelers book and watched almost all of his videos. If he has the understanding he thinks he does he’d be reinventing everything. He’d be showing us new things we’d Never seen before similar to that leedskalnin effect in scope. What he does instead is takes already well known and beaten to death science experiments and puts his twist on them with words not actions. Someone truly making breakthroughs would be able to show drastic new things that could not be ignored. I haven’t seen that from him. He is 100% on the right track though in his Dielectric thinking. I 100% agree with him like I said he’s just missing the other side of it which keeps him from truly putting it all together and changing everything. In my search I have found 11 things through my own experimentation that aren’t explainable by science. I work with engineers and am currently in school at night for engineering. I show some of the things to engineers and professors and they have no idea. Some of them get the truth search bug just from seeing it. Only one of these though is something I’ve yet to stumble onto someone else's discovery of them. What I cannot do is profess to know how it all works because I found something unexplainable. Just learning several small things has given me the ability to do other things not seen or understood. Imagine what I could do given true fundamental and complete understanding. I wouldn’t know where to start.

Thanks, this actually helps me to understand where you're coming from. Now I'm in my 60's which isn't that old, but still If I figure correctly I've used five of my possible nine lives, so probably not too many more foolish things I should try.

We all think we can do a lot at your age but shit happens, then before you know what hit you the next thing you know your little world is blown apart by some disaster, one day you wake up and suddenly ten years or more have swept by and you still haven't done jack. Lo;~

Do what you can, where you can, with the best intentions. That's all you can do and then hope that what you've done matters. Remember only 2% do anything, so if you've done something you're already in an elite group. * Lol

I do what I am trained to do academically and by natural talent, such as it is, but all I can really do is research and connect dots and then to try to paint a picture of what I think it says, and after that I can only hope people read what I write and improve upon it. Don't think you will be any different or that whatever you produce will be treated any differently.

Now with Wheeler just recognize he has done a great thing, whatever the faults may be, his book is undoubtedly the most important book ever written on magnetism, and because of that it is likely history will record it as an important text of the last century, possibly the most important scientific text, though I don't expect that to happen until the rich man's cabal is overthrown. Certainly Ken's thinking is bound to have errors, but it's a new path, and from what I've discovered it is on the correct path. It gives us new thinking and the material to understand the path that lead to gravitational control and then to hyperspatial vechicles. It may be flawed and it may need refining but that's what you're for, it's why Universe created you and why you're critical, and that's because Universe knows best and knows this is necessary. Universe wants humans to succeed but we have to overcome the challenges it allows, because unless we can do this we cannot succeed out in the Universe itself. Call it an extinction intelligence test.

What is this Dielectric actually? Is it insulator as Science told? Or it refers to something else?

To answer you directly;
Tart Aryan and I have been wrestling over issues related to this question. My short answer is: We don't know what it is, we only know that it is all around us, and that it can be made into either a magnet or electricity.

It is a bamboozling bit of electrical terminology. Believe me it is a question I've asked myself over and over, and it's not just me either, over on this other forum, a place where electronics engineers, hobbyists, and problem makers complain, they too have this same problem.

Before anything understand this; like all our messed up science and physics it begins with a corruption of truth. The reason you need to know that is so that you don't just swallow down the idea that electron theory is some proven concept. It works well up to a certain point but was never approved by Tesla, Farnsworth, and even J.J. Thompson himself didn't go along with it until he sold out for fame and fortune.

Now that you know that you can proceed with trying to figure out what a dielectric actually is.

The official definition is it's a material that acts like an insulator, and it is, it has to be an insulator or else we would all be fried if the ether which surrounds all of us is really made of energy that wasn't also insulated from itself. Probably where the idea for the big bang came from, stupid as it is in the first place, but just saying.

The air for example is an insulator. Yet it's filled with counterspace. Counterspace is Nick Cooks Zero Point Energy Field, Tesla's Radiant Energy, and it's real and correct name came from Steinmetz who called it Counterspace, but these are all the same energy, only with different names, but that field of energy is what fills the Universe and it is a dielectric energy field.

How do we know this? Because a magnet proves it, that is, a magnet can exist anywhere, in any place, at any time, and because we can now even see the magnetic field in it's holographic form with a ferrocell lens, we can also be relatively sure of how it works and what's creating it, and this is why Ken Wheelers book and theory of a simplex dielectric Universe is significant.

To me a dielectric is a conductor of dielectric energy (counterspace). In some instances some dielectrics can accumulate energy from the either. Quartz does this. Man made substances can now recreate the piezoelectric effect.

So that process has made the atoms bond together, in a way up & downward forces cannot break, but sidewards forces can.

Could this have to do with the thin layer of air that is still inbetween before that electromagnetic process ?
Dry air is dielectric, although it contains always bit of watervapor.

Professors & other researchers r not allowed to think outside the official box ! Most just want to keep their job, some aren't able due to indoctrination. There is so much suppressed knowledge, twisted truth or relative bullshit & absolute nonsense !

We know next to nothing about WATER. It's special, very special, doesn't follow the laws of physics.
It's a solvent, cleaner, transporter & transmitter of energy. It has memory, it takes on all of the frequency patterns of stuff it comes in touch with. It's everywhere, even in the air we breathe.

The crystalline structure of water (tetrahedron) can be destroyed, like when water is flowing through straight pipes. It can be restructured through swirling, vortexes or minerals like rose quartz, amethyst, rock crystal, ... . It is the geometric pattern, crystalline structure that contains the energy, information, not the matter itself.

Thanks, So the crystalline shape of water is a tetrahedron, I can't recall reading that but it seems familiar, however it clearly says something and thanks for posting that.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Jaska
Date: 2019-11-01 11:33:44
Reaction Score: 5

Water is a liquid crystal. It's literally everywhere, either solid, liquid or as vapor.
It reacts to words & emotions. Look for Masaru Emoto.

As far as I can grasp it is electromagnetism, one does not exist without the other. If there is a magnetic field, there is electricity ( flow of electrons or holes) & if there is electricity, there is a magnetic field.
There is no gravity, it is magnetism.

Atoms can be paramagnetic (attracted) or diamagnetic (repelled). Oyxgen being paramagnetic is slighty attracted to magnets, I recall reading about experiments with magnets placed next to fuel to increase the burning of the flames.

What about liquid air ? It's up there where the temperatures are very low, think it's around minus 194° C when air turns into a blue pale MOBILE liquid. And not that far up there, very close. Forget the HELIOcentric impossi.BAAL. we live inside an electromagnetic realm, we r in an air pocket in a water world, literally. The sun is a projection of light in a layer of liquid air. The stars r the electromagnetic frequency fence that separates the water above (liquid air or heavy saltwater) & the air.

 

[madroona]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: madroona
Date: 2019-11-01 12:27:55
Reaction Score: 3

Perhaps oblique to the conversion, but since the thread wanders, I thought to ask something I have pondered a long time on: why waves? Why do we accept the idea of waves without question? To accept a wave requires some object or action the repeatedly recaptures or retains an escaping something. We have all seen a sine wave metaphor on an oscilloscope and automatically visualize the wave passing through the space around us. We all discuss light "waves" or particles if you will, as just how it is, but .. why? What central force maintains the tangent of the path of the wave?

I try to keep my thoughts in this arena at "street level" to try an keep it manageable, but it may not be possible. I have a growing theory on light that destroys the myth (in my opinion) as to how vision works, but will keep it to myself for the time being as I work it out.

PS: is there a TOTY Award? {Thread of the Year}